Watch That Sweep has now rebranded as 12&60! We'll be bringing you new videos on all your favourite watches. You can also head over to the website www.12and60.com for new articles and reviews. We hope you enjoy! 😁
It sure as heck is. Going from my Sub to this felt small at first and then when I got used to it - it just dissapears on wrist and is so light and comfortable. I have a large collection and I wear the Explorer 1 about 95% of the time it just works from the field to the office and everywhere in between. No date dial is utter perfection without the cyclops screwing it all up. The bracelet is utter perfection too.
I second that. The cyclops on pretty much any other RLX is just a nuclear design bomb. I do not like the date on a watch, as to me... I dont need it and I hate to set the date and the time, once I change between my watches (and most of them sure do have the date). I fully agree with this review, the only thing I would miss is a proper Micro-Adjustment. But maybe you dont want the utter perfection in one watch as one may have more than only one watch (the perfect one).
@@MybeautifulandamazingPrincess ……Personally this new Explorer wears slightly small, I own and wear the 39mm that was discontinued and might be the perfect Explorer for anyone with a 7” wrist or larger. As much as the smaller version is a return to it roots the main difference is only the power reserve over the larger version. When I wear a watch, I never take it off anyway unless I’m doing something that would damage the watch! The use of a date and cyclops on this simplistic time piece could easily be added as an alternative version. Personally I like the option, as I enjoy the other Rolex’s like GMT Master 2 sport watch that has these features.
@@greatchalla3799 I think 38mm would have been a better size, rather than 39mm. I agree 36mm is too small but the horrid cyclops would've spoiled it totally.
@@martinstephenson4311 ….Until you’re vision is deteriorating no need for cyclops, I have a Sea Dweller 16600 ….. perfect size and for my 7.5” wrist and no cyclops, regarding the 39 mm Explorer wears larger. So if it was 38mm it might be a sweet spot. This is hypothetical it’s not going to matter as I’m not interested in exchanging what I already own.
Thanks for the great review. I have worn my Explorer exclusively for 17 years now. I dive with it, sail with it, and it has accompanied me all over the world, from as far south as Antartica to Fairbanks in the north. Looks very nice on the wrist at any formal event. An interesting note, perhaps, Ian Fleming wore an Explorer when typing the James Bond Novels. A number of 007 aficionados feel that the Explorer is the true watch of Bond and Flemings daughter has confirmed this. .
This is the best shot video I’ve seen on a watch CZcams channel in ages! Great compositions, propping, and lighting. Just the right blend of studio and documentary techniques. I’d go so far as to call it Cinematography, which is what I do for a living. I know how much time it takes to produce a video like this, so I wanted to say thanks and let you know your work is appreciated.
Watch people are so weird. "My favorite aspect is watching the gorgeous spectrum of effervescent beauty radiating off the oystersteel allow phatcock metal surface, it simply makes me rock hard".
Wears so well and the sizing does take some time to get used to but it is a perfect watch in every way. It's comfort is unparalleled. The movement is fantastic. More accurate than my g shock over a month!
Yep, but they also had Rolex too. For the sake of getting quickly into the review I didn't want to give the full history of the Explorer and the Everest expedition.
The 124270 is 99% perfect, just need to add the glide lock and maybe large hand set? But they might throw off the proportions. 36mm is the perfect size for the real “explorer”: key word is comfort. Funny to see so many people walking around with their oversized divers though never stepping into the water. My favorite daily for life.
0:39 Rolex already sponsored British Himalayan expedition since 1933 and the name " Explorer " was patented on January 26, 1953, 4 months before the ninth British expedition conquered Mt Everest Chomolungma on May 29, 1953. Moreover SMITHS was the 2nd sponsor with the pre-production A409 wrist watch.
Agree. Have a lot of experience with this model and continue to be very impressed. Accuracy is not even something I think about anymore, it’s so spot on.
Nobody is using time in terms of seconds. You do not sit there going to somebody how many seconds is on your watch or the bus is 10 seconds early or late. I have even seen peoples smart phones being off in time by several seconds to even a minute.
I am torn between this and the previous version. Given the subtle difference between the two, the ealier version at a much lower price point is really attracting me.
what are the games you need to play with an AD to get a new Rolex?? I have the 114270 that I bought in 2008... I love it for the reasons you stated in the vid.....good job!
@MusicMediaOutlets thats good for you. But if you watched the whole video, you should have heard the the guy refer to the games you have to play with and AD to get a watch. Thats what I was referring to
No need to play games. Last year in April I called the AD if they had a steel Datejust with fluted bezel in stock. They had. I could pick it up. 2 months later I email them for the Explorer. They called me back the same day that I could pick it up. Before the Datejust I had no history. Its depending on luck and the cooperation of the AD.
And if you don’t like the Eurostile numerals, you can get the OP which is £1000 less for the same specs. Yes the Explorer is special, but I would have wanted something more to differentiate it from the OP.
I tried it on at an AD and I was disappointed, too small and felt cheap, it looked like a ladies watch on my 6.5" wrist, it's the only Rolex I wanted but not anymore.
@@coffeeboyclips1973 nope, can't agree, I have a little smaller wrists and I love smaller watches, just like they used to make them decades ago, it's the right fit for me, also because it's not as flashy as other Rolex models, a small explorer is understated and I love that about the 124270
I tried this on at my AD. 36mm on my 19CM wrist was pretty small, but very comfy. I have a medium Cartier Santos which is also quite small, but that one on leather is made to be small, and expected. This Rolex Explorer is more difficult to pull off but not impossible. Sort of wish I grabbed a 39mm when I had the chance.
Real men in the past would have worn more discrete smaller watches that were good for telling time. Larger watches are great for scuba and other activities were visibility can become an issue.
i really want to like this watch and i think it is a nice watch but.....i feel like im pushed into liking it, there's something that's telling me not to buy it,yes its a rolex, yes its the quintessential watch, but i don't like the amount of writing on the dial and i don't like the polished bezel ring, maybe i will keep looking for the ultimate one watch if it exists?
@@southaussiemotorsport7962 36mm will be to small for my wrist, the 40mm mark 18 wears a bit big but it looks amazing, you should try one on if you get the chance.
36mm seems a little small... ..i believe this watch is actually less than 36mm when measured... and 40 or 41mm can be a little large for some... why dont they make 38mm .. i dont think rolex has any 38mm. i think thats the sweet spot of most
I haven't worn a 36mm watch in decades! Once I purchased my first G Shock...I refuse to wear anything smaller than a 45 mm watch. But...I am not an average sized male...at 6'6" or 1.98 meters tall with a 23 cm wrist...9"! I mainly wear larger watches, which I know smaller wristed guys can't wear comfortably. I just say, wear what you like and can afford.
Even at your size you could wear a more discrete smaller watch. The only reason why a person would wear a larger watch is for things like diving where visibility can be an issue. Nothing wrong with the watch you have.
I think the 19mm lug width also makes it wear small, it's closer to 35mm than 36mm, the proportions on the older 36mm models are better. I've got a small wrist and when I tried it on it was tiny, almost like a ladies watch.
No, it isn't, we just continue to circulate this particular myth because a lot of people lack the capacity to form their own opinions. And also because it's cool to do so, I guess.
We must remember that a good many of us people find 36mm simply too small. And while I see nothing wrong with this model, the 39mm Explorer was a blessing for those of us with larger wrists.
I can think of several model lines that are exclusively for large wrists, but it never seems to go in the other direction. Something with an exclusive complication sub-36mm
I think only insecure men whine about “lady size” watches. People have different preferences. There’s no right or wrong. But confident men would never put it down as “it’s the size for my girlfriend/wife,” or “it’s a lady size.”
dont let the obesity rate fool you. There is a reason men wore smaller watches in a time long ago. People love mentioning the bigger watch trend, but fail to realize it is largely due to the worlds obesity rate climbing. I'm a damn healthy 125lb 5'8 man and my wrists barely break 6 inch. 40mm look a bit ridiculous on my wrists.
Watches at the end of the day are a matter of taste. Wear what you love in good health and let others wear their watches in their taste. Room for all of us in this hobby. I love my 214270 in 40mm because it celebrates my son’s birth, but my 36mm date justs get the most wrist time. Just picked up a 16013 Birth Year date just this week to pass to my son with the 214270.
I’m always puzzled when one equates watch case diameter with gender. What exactly is the case diameter cutoff between a man’s vs woman’s watch? I would like to know so I don’t accidentally purchase the wrong size.
Well, I don’t think the 124270 would look proportional on a wrist size greater than 6-61/2 inches. Most men have at least a 6 1/2 inch wrist. That’s why I’m saying that the new Explorer is better suited for a woman’s wrist. That being said, I’m sure there is a small percentage of men who have a wrist that is smaller than 6 1/2 inches. In these cases, the watch would look fine. Finally, anyone commenting on this watch needs to have seen it in person before developing an opinion. It is very small and dainty.. noticeably smaller than a 36mm Datejust.
@@whereRbearsTeeth i've got tiny ass wrists. i wear "womens" watches all the time. i also am not a fan of chunkier watches to begin with. I fkin hate dive watches. 36mm wear similar to 40mm on my wrist. Its sad in some ways because i pretty much have to steer clear of anything 40mm. But i do get more options in "ladies" sizes (i dont go under 33mm) so it kind of balances out.
They should have offered the 39mm AND 36mm in the Explorer. 36mm is just too small for many….. including myself. I tried one on recently and it simply looked comical.
@@johnprosser5035 I get that 39 is the sweet spot for many, but I think that it’s just because we got ourselves used to wearing bigger watches that many think a 36mm is too small for them…in the last century every man wore 36 and even 35 or 34mm models, no matter how big of a guy they were, they’d probably feel awkward wearing the watches many men wear today
Practically every f-ing watch now is 39-42mm. Rolex makes *one* model in a classic size, and some people are complaining that too should've been supersized. Ridiculous. I get that we live under the reign of the Burger King and Dairy Queen, but it's preposterous how the fat wristed are incapable of tolerating even a single model that doesn't cater to their corpulent lard arms. You literally have thousands of watches to choose from in your preferred dimensions.
@@Danielpi one of the most versatile Rolex watches should be offered in a variety of sizes. Not all can wear 36 and not all can wear 42... why restrict the choice? Look at the datejust with its many options. Also, yes, in case you haven’t noticed humans are becoming bigger, not only because of obesity but also because of better nutrition and improved leaving conditions.
Tried one on…. Way to small and feel’s dainty!!! Had been on the wait list for the 39mm for 18 months before it was discontinued. The high polish is a scratch magnet….,Nowhere near the perfect watch…. Unfortunately
Watch That Sweep has now rebranded as 12&60! We'll be bringing you new videos on all your favourite watches. You can also head over to the website www.12and60.com for new articles and reviews. We hope you enjoy! 😁
It sure as heck is. Going from my Sub to this felt small at first and then when I got used to it - it just dissapears on wrist and is so light and comfortable. I have a large collection and I wear the Explorer 1 about 95% of the time it just works from the field to the office and everywhere in between. No date dial is utter perfection without the cyclops screwing it all up. The bracelet is utter perfection too.
I second that. The cyclops on pretty much any other RLX is just a nuclear design bomb. I do not like the date on a watch, as to me... I dont need it and I hate to set the date and the time, once I change between my watches (and most of them sure do have the date). I fully agree with this review, the only thing I would miss is a proper Micro-Adjustment. But maybe you dont want the utter perfection in one watch as one may have more than only one watch (the perfect one).
Lot's of people like a date window and magnification...
@@MybeautifulandamazingPrincess ……Personally this new Explorer wears slightly small, I own and wear the 39mm that was discontinued and might be the perfect Explorer for anyone with a 7” wrist or larger. As much as the smaller version is a return to it roots the main difference is only the power reserve over the larger version. When I wear a watch, I never take it off anyway unless I’m doing something that would damage the watch! The use of a date and cyclops on this simplistic time piece could easily be added as an alternative version. Personally I like the option, as I enjoy the other Rolex’s like GMT Master 2 sport watch that has these features.
@@greatchalla3799 I think 38mm would have been a better size, rather than 39mm. I agree 36mm is too small but the horrid cyclops would've spoiled it totally.
@@martinstephenson4311 ….Until you’re vision is deteriorating no need for cyclops, I have a Sea Dweller 16600 ….. perfect size and for my 7.5” wrist and no cyclops, regarding the 39 mm Explorer wears larger. So if it was 38mm it might be a sweet spot. This is hypothetical it’s not going to matter as I’m not interested in exchanging what I already own.
Thanks for the great review. I have worn my Explorer exclusively for 17 years now. I dive with it, sail with it, and it has accompanied me all over the world, from as far south as Antartica to Fairbanks in the north. Looks very nice on the wrist at any formal event. An interesting note, perhaps, Ian Fleming wore an Explorer when typing the James Bond Novels. A number of 007 aficionados feel that the Explorer is the true watch of Bond and Flemings daughter has confirmed this. .
Who cares what watch an author wore?? Wear the watch you like. It’s just ridiculous to desire a watch because someone else wore it.
@@whereRbearsTeeth Highly agree. As if wearing a particular watch turns you into a fictitous figure..
This is the best shot video I’ve seen on a watch CZcams channel in ages! Great compositions, propping, and lighting. Just the right blend of studio and documentary techniques. I’d go so far as to call it Cinematography, which is what I do for a living. I know how much time it takes to produce a video like this, so I wanted to say thanks and let you know your work is appreciated.
Thank you very much mate! It really is appreciated. 🙏
The 36mm size is a breath if fresh air. Such a good watch. A particular highlight for me is watching the way the sunlight dances around the dial
It’s not 36mm
@@whereRbearsTeeth sure
@@whereRbearsTeeth you’re splitting hairs over just under half a millimetre. A blind man would be pleased to see the difference.
Watch people are so weird. "My favorite aspect is watching the gorgeous spectrum of effervescent beauty radiating off the oystersteel allow phatcock metal surface, it simply makes me rock hard".
Wears so well and the sizing does take some time to get used to but it is a perfect watch in every way. It's comfort is unparalleled. The movement is fantastic. More accurate than my g shock over a month!
It was a Smiths watch that Tenzing and Hillary were wearing during their summit.
Yep, but they also had Rolex too. For the sake of getting quickly into the review I didn't want to give the full history of the Explorer and the Everest expedition.
The 124270 is 99% perfect, just need to add the glide lock and maybe large hand set? But they might throw off the proportions.
36mm is the perfect size for the real “explorer”: key word is comfort. Funny to see so many people walking around with their oversized divers though never stepping into the water.
My favorite daily for life.
36mm is for women.
Yeah and also funny to see many people walking around undersized watch so called “explorer” but never venture the mountain 😛
Hahaha that’s also true 😂
It’s not 36mm
If you really think about it, the glide lock is overrated.
0:39 Rolex already sponsored British Himalayan expedition since 1933 and the name " Explorer " was patented on January 26, 1953, 4 months before the ninth British expedition conquered Mt Everest Chomolungma on May 29, 1953. Moreover SMITHS was the 2nd sponsor with the pre-production A409 wrist watch.
Loved the fabulous video presentation - subscribed !!!
Congrats and much luck with your channel. Great review of the 124270. I own and love mine. Subscribed.
I like the quality of the new model but I prefer the look of the older versions.
Agree. Have a lot of experience with this model and continue to be very impressed. Accuracy is not even something I think about anymore, it’s so spot on.
As we stand today....I have had mine in fir 10 days and it hasnt even lost or gained 1 second....thats impressive
Nobody is using time in terms of seconds. You do not sit there going to somebody how many seconds is on your watch or the bus is 10 seconds early or late. I have even seen peoples smart phones being off in time by several seconds to even a minute.
Nobody thinks in terms of seconds, but a few seconds a day adds up to many minutes over weeks. Some of us do care about being minutes late
Great Video!!! I love my Explorer!!! Had it for 6 months now after waiting 9 months before picking it up at my local AD☺️
Absolutely stunning !
Absolutely beautiful presentation man!
Rolex was not worn on the 1st Summit of Everest. A British Smiths (similar to an A545) was worn/carried by Hilary.
They both were
@@mikebeaumont7558 they weren’t. Rolex was carried but not worn.
I am torn between this and the previous version. Given the subtle difference between the two, the ealier version at a much lower price point is really attracting me.
Rolex's best model IMHO. I absolutely love the 36mm and IMHO it could only be improved if they could slim the thickness down by a couple of mm...
My grail watch, elegant and simple, a sports watch bordering on a dress watch… one day…
Yes, the most perfect watch I have from my 2 watch collection. I wear it 5 days a week and wear the Jlc Reverso on weekends .
What are your thoughts on the two tone version?…seems very divisive, I personally think it’s awesome.
Like have a bi-metal hammer
Really want to see a 38 (with 20mm lugs) that wears like a true 36-37
what are the games you need to play with an AD to get a new Rolex?? I have the 114270 that I bought in 2008... I love it for the reasons you stated in the vid.....good job!
@MusicMediaOutlets thats good for you. But if you watched the whole video, you should have heard the the guy refer to the games you have to play with and AD to get a watch. Thats what I was referring to
No need to play games. Last year in April I called the AD if they had a steel Datejust with fluted bezel in stock. They had. I could pick it up. 2 months later I email them for the Explorer. They called me back the same day that I could pick it up. Before the Datejust I had no history. Its depending on luck and the cooperation of the AD.
Keep your 114270. It’s a far better looking watch than this new one.
And if you don’t like the Eurostile numerals, you can get the OP which is £1000 less for the same specs. Yes the Explorer is special, but I would have wanted something more to differentiate it from the OP.
Flat vs smooth bezel, lacquer vs sunburst dial, Mercedes hands, there’s a lot that differentiate them
it's the perfect watch imo...fingers crossed I won't have to wait too long to get mine!
I tried it on at an AD and I was disappointed, too small and felt cheap, it looked like a ladies watch on my 6.5" wrist, it's the only Rolex I wanted but not anymore.
@@coffeeboyclips1973 nope, can't agree, I have a little smaller wrists and I love smaller watches, just like they used to make them decades ago, it's the right fit for me, also because it's not as flashy as other Rolex models, a small explorer is understated and I love that about the 124270
@@timepiece_enthusiast it's a nice looking watch but it looked tiny on my wrist, its the only Rolex I like but unfortunately too small for me.
@@coffeeboyclips1973 bro there's a 39mm version
@@youraveragepasser-by7367 I know, but Im not paying £8k for one.
What camera did you use to film this? 🔥
Excellent review
Thanks! 😁
Non due Rolex sull'Everest. Uno dei due indossava uno Smiths...
Great review, thank you !
Coud you tell us your wrist size ?
Thank you for a great review
I tried this on at my AD. 36mm on my 19CM wrist was pretty small, but very comfy. I have a medium Cartier Santos which is also quite small, but that one on leather is made to be small, and expected. This Rolex Explorer is more difficult to pull off but not impossible. Sort of wish I grabbed a 39mm when I had the chance.
Real men in the past would have worn more discrete smaller watches that were good for telling time.
Larger watches are great for scuba and other activities were visibility can become an issue.
What's AD?
@@DraakMD Authorized Dealer
The good news is that you now have the 40mm available to you. I have a 20cm wrist, and am tempted.
totally agree about the state of getting a Rolex... i want to be able to buy something i love!
You can…… if you’re will to wait 12-18 months. In today’s society everyone wants what they want immediately
Classic!
It's no Invicta 55mm Formula 1-themed dive watch though
The 1950's designs were much better looking and Rolex should return to it.
Would be amazing to see the explorer in 38mm
Um no it would not.
@@bigmacdaddy1234 well, different strokes for different folks
i really want to like this watch and i think it is a nice watch but.....i feel like im pushed into liking it, there's something that's telling me not to buy it,yes its a rolex, yes its the quintessential watch, but i don't like the amount of writing on the dial and i don't like the polished bezel ring, maybe i will keep looking for the ultimate one watch if it exists?
It does exist, iwc mark 18 and 20
@@coffeeboyclips1973 yes I also have the iwc pilots watch 36mm IW324010 on my list I really like that watch
@@southaussiemotorsport7962 36mm will be to small for my wrist, the 40mm mark 18 wears a bit big but it looks amazing, you should try one on if you get the chance.
Greay piece og gear. Used to own one. Miss it. Very well done video!
Untrue. Norgay and Hillary were given a Smiths watch and a Rolex. It remains unclear until this day who wore which.
36mm seems a little small... ..i believe this watch is actually less than 36mm when measured... and 40 or 41mm can be a little large for some... why dont they make 38mm .. i dont think rolex has any 38mm. i think thats the sweet spot of most
I haven't worn a 36mm watch in decades! Once I purchased my first G Shock...I refuse to wear anything smaller than a 45 mm watch. But...I am not an average sized male...at 6'6" or 1.98 meters tall with a 23 cm wrist...9"! I mainly wear larger watches, which I know smaller wristed guys can't wear comfortably.
I just say, wear what you like and can afford.
Even at your size you could wear a more discrete smaller watch. The only reason why a person would wear a larger watch is for things like diving where visibility can be an issue. Nothing wrong with the watch you have.
very nice and beautiful watch..like hundreds of others
I have the new San Martin explorer with the sw200 movement inside . Ok . It's not a rolex ! Lol . But I love it and it was only $500 . Not $10 000 .
But you are still desperate for the real one. Otherwise you would not be here.
It has etch crown on 6'o clock
good to see you back. you no longer with watch gecko?
Cheers! And no, I left to start this.
@@12and60 good luck in your new venture.
"The perfect" Rolex watch would be the SKY DWELLER. It's the most informative watch.
🤣🤣🤣
Most Informative, but no one uses that info.
The perfect watch is the OP, with no big numbers on the dial and the crown at 12, cleanest and better looking
Enjoy my 39mm as the perfect one for me.
The aggressive bracelet taper made this 36mm look too dainty. Wasted.
Still prefer the 14270/114270 for their symmetry and proportions.
i own the 124270 and i sort of agree. looking at plenty of pictures/videos of the 114, i think it helps it feel more proportional indeed
I think the 19mm lug width also makes it wear small, it's closer to 35mm than 36mm, the proportions on the older 36mm models are better. I've got a small wrist and when I tried it on it was tiny, almost like a ladies watch.
Its the best watch i ever had. Its just perfection
Rolex ruined the Explorer with this new design. I prefer the 39, but as far as 36mm goes, the 114270 was a far nicer looking watch that the new one.
❤
a glide lock? why? would only make it fatter and no real use on a non diver.
👌🏼
Take long and explain those things in detail
if you only want 1 watch go to omega choose 1 and walk away with it on your wrist
For me no. It will always be the sub.
How often do you dive?
I wouldn't know... I CAN'T GET ONE ANYWHERE! 🙄
Wait another 6 months. They’ll be discounting them at the ADs.
@@whereRbearsTeeth What makes you think that? I don't see anything changing.
@@whereRbearsTeeth Dream on mate. The days of discounts from a Rolex AD are history.
@@cliffwheeler7357 for now.
in a word, "no!". 😂😂😂
No, it isn't, we just continue to circulate this particular myth because a lot of people lack the capacity to form their own opinions. And also because it's cool to do so, I guess.
We must remember that a good many of us people find 36mm simply too small.
And while I see nothing wrong with this model, the 39mm Explorer was a blessing for those of us with larger wrists.
I can think of several model lines that are exclusively for large wrists, but it never seems to go in the other direction. Something with an exclusive complication sub-36mm
It's not perfect because it does extremely little for the money it costs
Hands are too thin and the word Explorer at the top kills symmetry.
Unobtanium.......... Love it 😂
I think only insecure men whine about “lady size” watches. People have different preferences. There’s no right or wrong. But confident men would never put it down as “it’s the size for my girlfriend/wife,” or “it’s a lady size.”
Of course an Asian guy with a girls sized wrist would say this…
@J B
LOL.
dont let the obesity rate fool you. There is a reason men wore smaller watches in a time long ago. People love mentioning the bigger watch trend, but fail to realize it is largely due to the worlds obesity rate climbing. I'm a damn healthy 125lb 5'8 man and my wrists barely break 6 inch. 40mm look a bit ridiculous on my wrists.
@@whereRbearsTeeth No need for your comment Sir.
Watches at the end of the day are a matter of taste. Wear what you love in good health and let others wear their watches in their taste. Room for all of us in this hobby. I love my 214270 in 40mm because it celebrates my son’s birth, but my 36mm date justs get the most wrist time. Just picked up a 16013 Birth Year date just this week to pass to my son with the 214270.
Much prefer my GMT type Explorer II Polar, 40mm. This thing has no date either.
214270 is the best Explorer ever made. At just over 35mm, this new one is a ladies watch.
I’m always puzzled when one equates watch case diameter with gender. What exactly is the case diameter cutoff between a man’s vs woman’s watch? I would like to know so I don’t accidentally purchase the wrong size.
Well, I don’t think the 124270 would look proportional on a wrist size greater than 6-61/2 inches. Most men have at least a 6 1/2 inch wrist. That’s why I’m saying that the new Explorer is better suited for a woman’s wrist. That being said, I’m sure there is a small percentage of men who have a wrist that is smaller than 6 1/2 inches. In these cases, the watch would look fine. Finally, anyone commenting on this watch needs to have seen it in person before developing an opinion. It is very small and dainty.. noticeably smaller than a 36mm Datejust.
@@whereRbearsTeeth i've got tiny ass wrists. i wear "womens" watches all the time. i also am not a fan of chunkier watches to begin with. I fkin hate dive watches. 36mm wear similar to 40mm on my wrist. Its sad in some ways because i pretty much have to steer clear of anything 40mm. But i do get more options in "ladies" sizes (i dont go under 33mm) so it kind of balances out.
no my man. The Smiths watch was actually worn on Everest. Rolex just stole the story for the marketing. As usual.
Great video. But .....this is a lady sized watch
😂 such a stupid comment
Such an over rated watch
Agree, tried it on a few weeks ago and it looked tiny on my 6.5 wrist, felt cheap as well, I'll stick with my iwc mark 18 which looks better imo
Too small...should have been 40-42. Otherwise perfect. Could be one watch collection.
hell no, a 42mm Explorer? it is perfect with it's original 36mm
They should have offered the 39mm AND 36mm in the Explorer. 36mm is just too small for many….. including myself. I tried one on recently and it simply looked comical.
@@johnprosser5035 I get that 39 is the sweet spot for many, but I think that it’s just because we got ourselves used to wearing bigger watches that many think a 36mm is too small for them…in the last century every man wore 36 and even 35 or 34mm models, no matter how big of a guy they were, they’d probably feel awkward wearing the watches many men wear today
Practically every f-ing watch now is 39-42mm. Rolex makes *one* model in a classic size, and some people are complaining that too should've been supersized. Ridiculous. I get that we live under the reign of the Burger King and Dairy Queen, but it's preposterous how the fat wristed are incapable of tolerating even a single model that doesn't cater to their corpulent lard arms. You literally have thousands of watches to choose from in your preferred dimensions.
@@Danielpi one of the most versatile Rolex watches should be offered in a variety of sizes. Not all can wear 36 and not all can wear 42... why restrict the choice? Look at the datejust with its many options. Also, yes, in case you haven’t noticed humans are becoming bigger, not only because of obesity but also because of better nutrition and improved leaving conditions.
It’s NOT. I have it and trust me, you’ll need a date on it.
I trust you. hehe
Tried one on…. Way to small and feel’s dainty!!! Had been on the wait list for the 39mm for 18 months before it was discontinued. The high polish is a scratch magnet….,Nowhere near the perfect watch…. Unfortunately
Incorrect
120 grams of steel around your wrist “dainty” 😂 all steel watches are scratch magnets lol
Collecting scratches is the point.
Well I ended up getting the new 40mm in June
It is if you’re a lady or if you’re a man with a girls wrist.