How to implement maximum power point tracking for solar charging
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 07. 2024
- To learn more view Maximum power point tracking algorithm for low power solar battery charging reference design and download design files.
www.ti.com/tool/tida-01556
This training starts by giving an overview of the challenges associated with
maximizing efficiency of solar panels. It compares the
performance of several common maximum power point tracking (MPPT)
algorithms and provides an example of a simple MPPT implementation for solar
battery charging using a battery charger and a microcontroller and
analyses the algorithm's methodology, operation, and its performance data. - Věda a technologie
Excellent explanation! Thank you.
this is the best explanation of mppt thanks
Very cool and simple explanation. Love it. Question, since all MPP inverters choose to limit the MPPT voltage range in order to run it quicker what actually happens during the time the Panel is producing higher voltage outside the range? you lose the power? Thanks for a great video!
شكرا علي الدرس
Hi，
Could you tell me in PPT page 19, the outdoor test result, how do you manage to get the information about input power, input current and charging current and do the visualization?
I mean I know the charger/MCU may have these data but how to visualize it into such beautiful graph?
I'm confused about how to do the visualization.
Please tell me, thank you
Grateful for your presentation, please can you suggest to other extra references I can read which might strengthen my understanding of the subject matter. I am trying to learn much about designing battery chargers for single cells (lithium) to be specific.
I'd appreciate if you can respond to my humble request in no time.
can u sent me the presentation on pdf please
Dear Sir,
Can you please help us in designing MPPT Charger for 50A for 48V, 200AH Battery bank. With I/P voltage from panel to charger with a range of 70 to 150 V.
With some sort of our design specification.
Thanks
Hi Ranjeet-- please provide some details on your request in our E2E support community: e2e.ti.com/support/power_management/battery_management/f/179
Ranjeet please can you contact with me i have some question
hello
can u send me this presentation. tnks.
5:22 Incremental Conductance. Why P/V?
I/V-conductance
Hi ravdobrzynski, thanks for your interest! You can search our TI E2E Support Forums for an answer to your question here: e2e.ti.com.
This algorithm is... awful. Yes, it would work, if I'm hearing your description correctly. But it increases VinDPM through the whole range from 65% to 90% Voc before stopping and resetting VinDPM to the sensed MPP. And it will do this Every Time something changes. It would track faster if you
A. changed the condition to stop after the first time the condition is satisfied, and
B. allowed the loop to track Both directions, Up and Down???
Or at least just A. But with both changes it could start in the middle of the range, save a little time, and suck less of the precious charge power from the system just trying to find the MPP.
It doesn't rerun the MPPT every time something changes; that would be inefficient, and the algorithm would never find the MPP because in the time it takes to find it, it would have moved! The hold time allows a period when the operating parameters of the panel are kept static, then the algorithm re-establishes a new MPP. I think you have to remember though that TI's business is making chips, not MPPT algorithms. The algorithm really just showing what can be achieved the reference design for the chip being featured in the video. Undoubtedly, the algorithm, can be improved. I suspect some purchasers of the chip will use this basic algorithm, just because it is not worth improving it.
Potentially a better way to improve such algorithms might be to have another sensor input that can tell the algorithm how the environment has changed since the last tracking attempt. A sensor that could tell the algorithm that the light levels has increase or decreased and by how much, would give the algorithm a much better idea where to start its scanning from, and in which direction to move. Reducing the scan time would allow more frequent scanning, which would reduce loses as the environmental conditions move away from the operating parameters set by the MPPT.