Evolution vs. God
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 08. 2013
- Watch the uncensored, expanded version of Evolution vs. God here: • Evolution vs. God Unce...
Hear expert testimony from leading evolutionary scientists from some of the world's top universities:
• Peter Nonacs, Professor, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UCLA
• Craig Stanford, Professor, Biological Sciences and Anthropology, USC
• PZ Myers, Associate Professor, Biology, University of Minnesota Morris
• Gail E. Kennedy, Associate Professor, Anthropology, UCLA
A study of the evidence of vestigial organs, natural selection, the fifth digit, the relevance of the stickleback, Darwin's finches and Lenski's bacteria-all under the microscope of the Scientific Method-observable evidence from the minds of experts. Prepare to have your faith shaken.
"Evolution Vs. God" dubbed in Spanish: • Evolución vs. Dios (Sp...
"Evolution Vs. God" subtitled in Portuguese: • EVOLUÇÃO vs DEUS (Port...
DVD purchases available at www.EvolutionVsGod.com
If you want to see this movie without all of the blurred censoring that CZcams put on this video, as well as with an expansion, go here: czcams.com/video/jeSxIqAYP4M/video.html
When I watch the original, there are no blurred faces. Maybe they removed it because they were busted and called out...
How odd that it only started being blurred out in certain areas.
@Jeb Bohanan they only blurred the faces of the "scientists". I'm assuming because the "scientists" were ridiculous, and absolutely didn't do any favors to their religion of evolution.
But now when I watch it, they're not blurred...
@@TinaMarie75 😂😂😂😂 "'religion of evolution'" ??? 😂
@jesusgavemeaids yes...
evolution is just as much a religion as any other. It takes more faith to believe everything came from nothing than to believe in a Creator. It's taught in schools and nothing else is allowed to be taught. Evolutionists defend their stance just as any religious person defends their deity. It's no different than a religion.
I am a Chemist and after many years of being an atheist I began a path to creationism. I seem to be a happier person since reading the new testament.
For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2 Corinthians 4:2
The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints,Ephesians 1:18
amen! God bless you!
Mick9 And you will make a good witnessing tool to the science community in showing them that science is the affirmation of God's dominion.
Maybe even write a book.
I would buy it.📕
rgsand01 Its time to stop. Its his life, stop judging.
And you will be happier if you read Quran, may God bless you and gide you
My mother and sister have prayed for me to be free from my heroin addiction for a decade and I am finally set free and born again in Christ! Glory to God!!! ✝️🧎🏻♀️
I don’t have a religion, I have a relationship. I don’t have a support system, I’m in the process of finding a church. All I do have is my Faith and my God. All I know is, nothing else worked until I found God.
My only intent is to tell MY testimony and what worked for ME. Everyone has their own journey.
Amen! And the unfortunate hate believers receive is just more proof of the truth of God.
*_"If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me."_*
John 15 : 18-21
May God bless!
ForumLight Thank you so much for your kindness and inspiration! I’m truly grateful for your beautiful soul. I will never stop giving the glory to God no matter what. ✝️🧎🏻♀️ God bless you also.
Still Booble Praying for you. God bless. ✝️✝️✝️✝️🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
You did mentioned something very true: PEOPLE ARE SO INTO LIVING A SINFUL & EARTHLY LIFE STYLE, they don’t want to leave it , so they AVOID EVERYTHING ABOUT GOD’S TRUTH ! Period.
Let's put gods truth to the test .
Can this crap show of a universe be repeated .
Does a kind mean species.
Does god know more than you.
Does god change.
Does Ray understand science.
Let's keep the education the bible has to offer humanity on that same shelf, reserved for fariy tales and magically caused events, such as the illusion of Ray Comfort being a wise man.
Take a better look at your intellectual designer and the design. See the flaws.
True that. One day we'll all know the truth but by that time, it'll be too late for many.
@@krazylevin
Why would it be too late for so many people or because they don't believe the same way you do. Mind you there are cultures much much older than Christianity and Muslim and Hindi and yet they don't seem to be credited with being the original knowledge of what God's mind is like
@@qhvianthomasmidgely5th.62 praying for you
@@hinokami_10 Thinking for you.
"People are fish." - Society's smart people today.
And do you understand what they mean by it?
@@demiligne3456 of course. I also understand when quantum scientists tell us the universe doesn't really exist. Only problem is that I can see that it does. And I can see that we're not fish.
Good, we're not literal fish. So what's your understanding of why smart people would say we are?
@@demiligne3456 because they think everything evolved from the ocean. Also, our atmosphere is liquid like compared to the atmosphere of other planets... plus some people are as dumb as fish and swim in schools.
@@demiligne3456 But also, those same smart people would say a whale isn't a fish so the irony is palpable.
It makes me so sad that the older ones are the ones who are the most stubborn whereas the younger ones are willing to change :(
That’s because they are likely hard hearted. They have probably heard the gospel before, and the Holy Spirit convicts the world of sin and judgment, but they probably resisted all the way to that age. There seems to be a point where God lets go, because when you say no the first time, it becomes easier to say no again. But of course we should pray for them.
God is never changing . Mankind does though. GOD says these things are evil and Ya'll don't like what HE SAYS so you try to change people's minds with your carnal way of thinking. Do you think GODS mind will be changed when you stand before HIM! And you will stand before HIM! Who are you to rail against the ALMIGHTY GOD! For unbelievers there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
@@cowboymouth6429 Have you stoned anyone recently? If not, then why aren't you following God's word?
@@psilocybinx8596 That's the old testament. Try reading it so you can have a better understanding.
Because they're still learning.
Hello Ray. As a Muslim I translated your video into Farsi (Persian) and it was well praised in Iran.
link??
❤
So you are not a muslim then anymore?
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
Doesnt change the fact that Iranians belief in the false God and will end up in hell.
i wish Muslims would convert to Christianity, because we need such strong believers.
Because the world already is so wicked.
I love the extremely thoughtful way Ray evokes our God-reflected intelligence :) I was an agnostic for 27 years, and it brought me nothing but despair, suicidality, and existential dread. When Ray spoke of his life changing overnight, I can absolutely attest to that. Christianity has given me peace, understanding, and purpose. I started pursuing it with the idea of, 'Even if it's not real, what harm can it do?' I didn't quite expect to be so wholly changed, but I no longer have an excuse to doubt. People love their sin, and they also, like me, might feel that they couldn't possibly be accepted by God because of their inability to understand or logically reason it. But if you take the Bible at face value, with honest objectivity, it offers the most logical moral argument for human existence and creation than any other book I've had the pleasure of reading.
“Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance, the only thing it cannot be is moderately important.”
― C.S. Lewis
Better safe than sinning, I say. :) and as Ray has said, 'Fear is your friend.' It's that innate sense of value God placed on each and every one of us that keeps us alive. We need to value our eternity just as much as our immediate, observable life.
I love you, reader. I hope you will search for the greatest Love and Peace ever known.
This deserves so many more likes and comments 🎉
@@alexabbitt6135
No. As an Agnostic I know that he is not going evidence or reason which is what Agnostics do. He chose to give on reality and join a religion that makes promises based on nothing but whatever it takes to con the gullible.
God reflected intelligence? What intelligence
"Christianity, if false, is of no importance "- I'm not sure the victims of religious wars, persecutions and genocide would agree with you there.
@@frostymcfang4656
What can you expect from a guy that called himself an Atheist because he was angry at his god? C. S Lewis was not rational where his religion was involved.
“Take a look at what happened 65 million years ago” I can’t... that was 65 million years ago. 😂😂
@@tracyharyklia8883 , when Jesus was crufied 2000 years ago, there were people who seen it and wrote the story. 2000 years ago people were well versed in written langauge und literature. 65 millions ago there no human beings on earth who would have recorded the histroy thats the different.
@bl Thing is God is the problem because he created Satan. If he was all knowing, why did he create satan in the first place?
skuggkungen We definitely have free will. It’s not like the other option is to burn in Hell or anything.
skuggkungen Maybe if he didn’t create satan, Eve wouldn’t have been tempted to eat from the tree 🤷♂️. The whole sacrifice seems pointless, is it really sacrifice if he gets it back in 3 days?
I don’t know about you but if an all knowing God can’t even get his intentions right, then something’s wrong somewhere.
I DO believe in the "Big Bang" theory. I believe that GOD spoke it and "BANG" it happened.
@Edward The Booble "i believe"
@Edward The Booble you are evidence that there has to be God, cuz I dont know where in the world you Love, sense of Justice, morals especially Morals and conscience come from unless love evolved too 😅😅😅😅😅
that made me giggle
Do you know that the bible tells us how God created us and it was not with a bang or BOOM. Just search Genesis 1 And then read chapter 1 and Chapter 2.
@@dktn8080 it was a joke cuh
I remember reading the Bible one of my first times as a new believer. There was a list of does and donts and I realized I was doing a lot of the donts. I didn’t read my Bible for at least two weeks after that. I felt like I could never live up to that standard. The Holy Spirit was still with me tho and convicted me to press on with my studies. 7 years later and I’ve grown so much in Christ ♥️ granted I’ve still got more growing to do but God will finish what He started in me ❤️
It is hard to admit we are sinners and need to be reborn, but it’s so worth it. Thank you Jesus
Lately I've been feeling so sinful. I follow God and I try to be righteous but I feel like God doesn't want me.
@@drea8024 Drea, God sent his son as a substitute for yours and my sins. Satan is a liar, of course thats how you will "FEEL" because the liar whispers lies unto you. God "WHISPERS" truths unto you from the bible. Go read Luke 4, how did Jesus overcome the devils lies? So, when Satan asked him to cast himself down from on high, Jesus simply said, It is WRITTEN, thou shall not tempt the Lord thy God. When Satan offered him all the kingdoms of the world o-if he would only follow him, Jesus simply said, "Thou shalt worship the Lord they God only, etc. etc. Read the word. Stay out of THE WORLD. God Bless
@@drea8024 Even Paul said that the things he does, he doesn’t want to do….salvation doesn’t mean you will not sin. When you do sin you have an advocate. I spent 20 years after salvation not thinking I was saved bc I wasnt changing as much as I thought I should. Just let God transform you day to day. Google the promises of God and read them every day.
cringe
@@frostymcfang4656 Enjoy your stupidity in hell.
I love that they say there are thousands of examples of Darwin evolution yet not a single one can think of one example
My neighbor is an agnostic and believes in evolution, but is very conservative so we have great discussions. I asked him if he has seen any half monkey half fish lifeforms lately? He smiled and said lets talk some more about it.
@@centralcoastcamper9631 well though have you ever seen god or jesus or angels anywhere either exactly
Evolution is a theory. It takes just as much faith to believe we evolved from monkeys as it does that God created us. We all have faith, rather we would like to admit it or not. If scientists believe that humans are nothing more than globs of atoms then what is restraining humanity from destroying itself?
Where does compassion, morals, and value systems come from? Humans are more than just tissue, we have a soul, a deeper aspect of our existence. I rather spend my life devoted to someone and a purpose greater than me. My experience is stronger than facts, I know that God is real! John 3:16 NKJV
@@centralcoastcamper9631 you clearly don't understand how evolution works. Natural selection isn't never going to select qualities for a species that are detrimental to reproduction so you won't ever see a half monkey or half fish, what you will see are a species of fish changing in size, losing their fins, evolving new type of teeth etc, over several millenia. These small changes compounded lead to macro evolution.
@@centralcoastcamper9631 there is no such thing as halfanimals in evolution, evolution is a process that involves time, monkeys evolved way later that fishes, tiktaalik is the example of fishes becoming terrestrial, they evolved to primitive amphibians that evolved to modern amphibians and primtive reptiles, thode reptiles evolved to squamata(lizards and snakes), archosauria( crocodiles, dinosaurs, birds) and also sinapsids(pelicosaurus and mammals)
I'll rely on my faith in God over the blind faith in man.
Sir Isaac Newton the greatest scientist who ever lived, was a strong believer in God and in fact wrote more about God than he did about science.
Wasn't he the one that made the quote, "you are a fool if you don't believe in God" or something.
If you're willing can you give what he wrote or books you suggest about his evidence.......I'm not just asking I really mean it.....www.muamuanngaihte24@gmail
@@muamuanngaihte5055 I know of the Principia Mathematica was written by Newton. In that book he wrote that he made the book so that the thinking man might believe in God. Newton also said what a wonderful God to do gravity that way.
@@kennethgee2004 thank you
@@themilkyway1371The second part is not true. The universal law of gravity is still in effect. The formula still predict how large bodies interact. The no law will ever be overturned as a law by definition is prove to such a degree that all possibilities have be exhausted. There is no way to invalidate a law.
I like seeing the comparison between different ages of people. Typically you would think that the younger people are immature and close minded, but it’s clear here that the older “professionals” have no intention of thinking about these things, whereas the younger people are very polite and open minded (most of the time, haha)
the older people have had more time to harden their heart against the Holy Spirit.
The past cost our elders more than it does us in our musings and intellectual experiments.
@@sweetsava11yes it’s sad, they get offended I think their pride and ego blinds them from the truth
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
Thank you for this video. What are the floating blurred-out squares on the screen?
To keep peoples identities hidden?
"Professing to be wise they became fools." Romans 1 v22.
Ever since I saw Bikers For Trump I had a realization. Bikers can be adorable.
So that could later become wise
If a fool can figure out evolution is true then what's your excuse?
Prehistoric Proboscidean fools, by their very nature and meaning of the word,"fool", can't figure out anything. However, the "fool" hath said in his heart, there is no God!
RevvedUpBiker
Cltr C
Cltr V
GG
Greetings from Italy 🇮🇹 after I found living waters gospel my life changed.. GOD bless everyone
This is how I hate those people
Dio non esiste fratello
Al N quello che tu pensi non cambia la realtà
@@rebeccaafriyie105 La realtà è che evoluzionne è vera e un fatto de la nostra realità.
@@kijul468 dipende da cosa intendi con evoluzione. Se ti riferisci all’adattamento allora sì, ma se si parla di macroevoluzione, questa non è mai stata provata ma semplicemente dedotta. Ci sono un sacco di pezzi mancanti che non sono mai stati trovati perché non sono mai esistiti. Nessuna specie si è mai letteralmente evoluta in un’altra. E la realtà lo testimonia.
I love when Ray asked for observable evidence and they all just stood there awkwardly.
Yeah he even left the people with PHDS speechless
Well it would be more awkward trying to prove an invisible, untestable magical sky fairy exists.
@@SimplyGun for example
@@michaelshell331 theres a creator as its a scientific impossibility for the universe to crate itself
@lehach92 Good question .Christianity because it is the most historically accurate and it made prophecies that came true
I'm having trouble playing this video. Would you guys be able to repost the same video? Also, I greatly appreciate your ministry!
czcams.com/video/uc_W9VtzJ0A/video.html
Now i believe in Jesus Christ
Amen!
@Aaditya kshetri it's a privilege to serve God.
@Aaditya kshetri I want you to imagine a speck of Sand compared to the entire universe, what would that speck of sand be in comparison to the universe? nothing right, now imagine that intensified, imagine your life compared to eternity, eternity! So do you want to thrive in this world now or eternity? because I tell you very truly that the second you give your life to CHRIST from then on it will be a eternity of flourishing life that’s what GOD is LIFE, GOD is life if you want life you need GOD
Repent( turn away) from your sins and not only believe God but also put all your trust and faith and all in Christ and also believe that He died on the cross for all of our sins and for all of us and rose on the third day to prove He’s the son of God (God in the flesh) and that He has authority over death and all
Acts 3:19
Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord,
Proverbs 3:5
Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding;
@Aaditya kshetri you are using God's name in vein and will have to face him one day on judgement day
@Aaditya kshetri People often think God is trying to take something from you. But it's the opposite. It's all about what he can GIVE to you. This is the greatest love story on earth and I would hate for you to miss out...Just think about it friend.
"So they're still bacteria?"
"Well of course."
"So they're still finches?"
"Well of course."
"So they're still fish?"
"Well of course.
Exactly. Ray asks for a change of kind as they always claim, like some populations of fish 'evolving' over generations eventually into amphibians, or some populations of amphibians 'evolving' over generations eventually into reptiles and so on. Or populations of animals that never had (hearts, brains, eyes, digestive systems, reproductive systems and more) 'evolving' such things over generations. They never can. They just cite what only shows yet again what common descent from a first life form evolutionists claim is science is anti-science.
The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by,
no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations",
no matter how much "change in allele frequencies",
no matter how much "development of new species",
no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals",
no matter how much "adaptation",
no matter how much "mutation",
no matter how much "speciation",
no matter how much "migration",
no matter how much "genetic drift",
no matter how much "insert other claims here"
no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of:
fish remain fish
amphibians remain amphibians,
canines remain canines,
felines remain felines,
reptiles remain reptiles,
birds remain birds,
viruses remain viruses,
animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs
animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts
animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes
animals that never had brains do not evolve brains
animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths
living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system
animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on.
There are many more such groups.
Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science.
Evolutionist can never address these facts - many then just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
Evolutionists typically deceive and pretend making up reasons to believe in their common descent from a first life form belief system is the same as "observing" it, which just goes to show how they're just about deception.
Evolutionists also typically deceive and try to pretend that since you cannot "observe" a certain crime, but can look at "evidence" for a crime, that shows we can know things happened without observing it. But what they hope no one notices: the thing called a "crime" is observable, repeatable, verifiable reality, so now we can look for forensic 'evidence' of some *more* crimes that no one is around to have observed. What they do is the same as giving 'evidence' for something that's never been observed even once by the human race, and yet claim that's also an observation of this belief that newer happens, which is just more deception.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of people are witness to the fact Jesus Christ rose from the dead, along with others being raised from the dead, and they wrote about it. Direct observation. But it's still not science because it's not *repeatable* and not *verifiable.* There's also evidence He rose from the dead, but it's STILL not science that people can be raised from the dead, in spite of evidence, and in spite of it also being directly observed - because it's not *repeatable* and not *verifiable.* And so it goes with the belief of common descent from a first life form - not only is it not *repeatable,* not *verifiable,* it's not even *observable* either - which makes the resurrection far more likely to be called science before the belief of common descent from a first life form ever could.
That aside, I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any church or any religion or anyone has claimed they say and sincerely consider yet again for ourselves. Judgment is coming for us all for our lifetime of sinning AND refusing God's offer to forgive and forget in the person of Jesus Christ. But religions also twist God's truth to make people think it's their religion and system of rules that makes them right with God when it's about a person: Jesus Christ, and choosing to have a relationship with Him, having a change of mind about living for the world and turning back towards God/ Jesus Christ.
John 3 : 14-21 *_"[Jesus said] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up [i.e., on the cross]: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved [exposed]. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."_*
+ *ForumLight*
*"Science shows that it's observable, repeatable ... no matter how much "adaptation" ... fish remain fish ... etc."* Science cannot show that fish* always remain fish, canines remain canines, or any of that until it observes every single lineage of fish that's ever existed. Can you find a comprehensive study on every fish that's ever existed? Can you show us a scientific study that concludes that fish always remain fish that _doesn't_ base it on the fact that we just haven't observed the opposite yet?
Science isn't "We haven't observed this happening, therefore it's _observable, repeatable and verifiable_ that it can't happen.". That's the problem we're having with your comment. You're taking an absence of observation for evidence of absence, despite the other evidence to the positive. Yes, evolution requires some things that would otherwise seem overwhelmingly counter-intuitive, but it's done the heavy lifting to back it up.
Science is limited by our level of technology and not what we can directly observe. We can't directly observe the Roman Empire but we know it existed because we can observe what remains of it - ie. records, coins, cities, etc. Likewise, we can't directly observe dinosaurs evolving into chickens, but we can indirectly observe it by looking at what's left - ie. fossils, chicken DNA. This is how science come up with the reasoning behind its conclusions and, when it's done properly, it's as good a reason to believe it as anything else.
Here's what *is* science: no matter how many millions of years,
no matter how many rocks there are,
no matter how quickly they're moving,
no matter what shape they are
no two rocks will ever attract each other together,
no rocks with build themselves into a planetoid,
no rock will shape itself into a sphere,
no rock will attract other rocks into orbit.
That's the sort of logic you're working with. It all seems fine, because it correlates with 99% of observations anyone has ever made. You or I will never see two stone float together or change shape, and they couldn't even make that happen in a lab. Therefore, it's all anti-science.
Except none of that holds up given what we know what we do about how planets are formed. Rock attrition can happen by gravity and electrostatic forces, building up to small planetoids and, eventually, full-on planets. We know this through research, and the evidence is strong enough that we can confidently disregard what would otherwise seem like a common sense conclusion.
Science can tell us that, for all the hundreds of years of study, it hasn't observed a fish becoming something else. That's some pretty strong evidence that it can't happen, and I think it's what you're getting at, but it's not absolute, because it isn't comprehensive.
Of course, the fact that it isn't comprehensive opens the possibility that it _can_ happen and that we just haven't seen it happen. Cue the theory of evolution. It provides a _method_ for how a fish can become something else. It also give us observational evidence of the same process happening on a small scale unobstructed, and it even explains why we couldn't observe anything more substantial in the first place. It, too, is imperfect, but it can be backed-up, and it's the best we've got right now.
* a fish in this example being a primitive organism that looked like what we'd call a fish (In fact, these early creatures weren't genetically the same as modern fish. In fact, the biological classification they fall under _would_ remain the same for all its billions of years of descendants, despite the obvious fact that its descendants are physically and genetically distinct from it and their cousins.)
Even if someone were to take the time to go through your brick wall of a copy-paste comment, wading against the current of what sounds kinda reasonable in isolation but nevertheless is at odds with all of modern science, you'd just continue posting it on other threads (again). Why bother with that user's response when no one in any other thread is going to see it? All that matters is that I'm right!
Flying elephants are a good example of a negative that can be proven without an exhaustive study. We can just look at the anatomy. It's the same with evolution. If you want to disprove it, give us a proof. Look at the elephant's anatomy.
There are claims of observing Jesus rise from the dead like there are hundreds of people claim to have witness Bigfoot. Eyewitness testimony is unreliable even when it isn't thousands of years old.
_Don't just continue to insist science shows this and that without backing yourself up as if lack of direct observation is enough. It isn't. Science has shown these things to be feasible through other means._
@@demiligne3456 good little Science gatekeeper. Keep on believin'!
@@bd1zzl3If you want to prove your God exists, you're gonna have to do a helluva lot better than a zinger you think is clever to prove your case. You can call the number 2 'fat' all you want, 1+1 is still gonna equal 2.
@@chrishaven1489 if that made any sense it might have been worth the time to type. I don't have anything to prove to anyone, enjoy your time.
Hello ray, iam parimala, science student from India but i need to defend my faith,
I watched almost all your videos, and I want the evidence bible but i can't afford it from India. But i want i, Iam praying God for that bible will be available to me
Hello. I pray that you get a Bible. If there are those professing Christians who claim "God used common descent evolution [because of science]" ask them if they believe that Jesus Christ rose from the dead. They'll say yes. Then point out it IS reproducible scientific fact when a person dies and body grows room temperature they're not coming back. So the resurrection IS contrary to science, yet we believe God anyway. So why throw out other things God makes clear over a common descent belief which is contrary to science. It shows that science is not the issue - but being embarrassed to believe God over what unsaved mankind says.
Science is about the repeatable portion of reality, not things like common descent evolution that contradict repeatable reality, can only be believed in, and they call reasons to believe in it 'evidence'.
The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by,
no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations",
no matter how much "change in allele frequencies",
no matter how much "development of new species",
no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuaIs",
no matter how much "adaptation",
no matter how much "mutation",
no matter how much "speciation",
no matter how much "migration",
no matter how much "genetic drift",
no matter how much "insert other claims here"
no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of:
fish remain fish
amphibians remain amphibians,
canines remain canines,
felines remain felines,
reptiles remain reptiles,
birds remain birds,
viruses remain viruses,
animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs
animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts
animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes
animals that never had brains do not evolve brains
animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths
living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system
animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on.
There are many more such groups.
Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science.
Evolutionist can never address these facts - many unfortunately just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're seem to be really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
===== Part TWO =====
Here are a few objections/claims they may bring up when they cannot address the above observable, repeatable and verifiable facts:
*Evolutionists sometimes try to claim you're against science.*
Science is fine and requires no belief.
In the entire existence of the human race: Objects drop to the ground. Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required.
In the entire existence of the human race: Diseases spread. Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required.
In the entire existence of the human race: All populations of: canines remain canines, fish remain fish, reptiles remain reptiles, animals that never had hearts do not evolve hearts, animals that never had digestive systems do not evolve digestive systems (or brains, or eyes, or reproductive systems and many, many more cases like these). Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required.
*Evolutionists sometimes try to say they don't claim that populations of 'animals turn into other animals' over generations*
Quite the opposite. Evolutionists claim the first life form was a single cell. They claim that it is the ancestor of all living things today. That's "animals turning into other animal" over generations of mythological proportions. They claim humans, apes, rats, banana plants (50% DNA similarity to human beings) are all related - that's again "species turning into other species" of mythological proportions, claiming all life is related.
At some point reptiles did not exist in their worldview. That means they cIaim over generations some populations animals that were never reptiles 'evolved' over generations eventually into reptiles - That's "animals turning into other animals" over generations to mythological degrees.
At some point no animals had brains. This means they claim over generations some populations of animals that never had brains 'evolved' brains over generations.
Yet when called out on this some evolutionists even try to say "evolution doesn't say species turn into other species", which again is just not honest. It shows they not only know they're wrong, but they show their intent to push this falsehood anyway.
*If you point out evolutionists "populations over generations" claims, and some will dishonestly pretend you're claiming evolutionists are saying that one kind of animal 'gives birth' to another kind".* Which again is clearly deception. Science shows *populations over generations* do not do what they claim.
*Evolutionists typically imply making up reasons to believe in their common descent from a first life form belief system is the same as "observing" it,* which of course is false and is just circular reasoning. Making up beliefs ABOUT fossils or ABOUT DNA *that never happens* does not then make fossils or DNA 'evidence' or an 'observation of' of the belief you just made up about them.
*Evolutionists also typically resort to the crime analogy.* For example, since you cannot "observe" a certain crime, but can look at "evidence" for a crime, that shows we can know things happened without observing it. But what they ignore: the thing called a "crime" is already observable, repeatable, verifiable reality, so now we can look for forensic 'evidence' of some *MORE* possible crimes that no one is left alive to have observed it. By sharp contrast, what evolutionists do would be the same as giving 'evidence' for some strange new crime that's never been observed even once by the human race, and yet claim that's also an observation of this crime that never happens actually happening (for example: a "crime" of turning someone into a tree).
*Even some people factually observing something that's never happened is not science if it's not repeatable and also verifiable.* So for example, hundreds of people are witness to the fact Jesus Christ rose from the dead (or that He raised others from death), and they wrote about it. Direct observation. But it's still not science because it's *not repeatable* and not *verifiable.* There's also evidence He rose from the dead, and some have observed Him alive after the fact, but it's STILL not science that people can be raised from the dead, in spite of evidence, and in spite of it also being directly observed - because it's not *repeatable* and not *verifiable.* And so it goes with the belief of common descent from a first life form - not only is it not *repeatable,* not *verifiable,* it's not even *observable* either - which makes the resurrection far more likely to be called science before the belief of common descent from a first life form ever could. But neither of them can be called science of course.
===== Part Three =====
*Evolutionists almost always are against Christ but are teaching their religion* that goes along with their belief of common descent from a first life form - the belief of 'nothing did it - it all just happened on it's own, including life - you're just another animal related to all animals - so live how you want and you'll rest in peace when you die". But they also pass this religion off 'you are god' off as science as well.
That in mind, I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any church or any religion or anyone has claimed they say and sincerely consider yet again for ourselves. Judgment is coming for us all for our lifetime of sinning AND refusing God's offer to forgive and forget in the person of Jesus Christ. But religions also twist God's truth to make people think it's their religion and system of rules that makes them right with God when it's about a person: Jesus Christ, and choosing to have a relationship with Him, having a change of mind about living for ourselves and turning back towards God/ Jesus Christ to live for Him instead.
John 3 : 14-21 *_"[Jesus said] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up [i.e., on the cross]: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved [exposed]. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."_*
Live forever, friends!
and? :)
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
This video is unavailable on this device?
czcams.com/video/uc_W9VtzJ0A/video.html
Look at the way these professors and students are struggling to defend this darwinian Theory. May the Good Lord have mercy on you guys.
Jonah Gobah amen
Julius Dauksys that doesn’t matter. These professors teach that junk every single day, all Ray asked for was “one piece of evidence “ “ your best evidence “ . Truth is it’s the same everywhere, none of these “teachers” have any inclination of evidence. They sure do have faith in their belief tho..
Julius Dauksys seriously? Ok we can start here, and what was the moth before it was a “peppered moth”? We want to see one kind changing into a different kind of animal/insect. Don’t just give me an example of variation. There has never been any evidence for macro evolution.
Evolution is fake.
Julius Dauksys, you’re wrong. Evolution is fake. I said so.
This scripture decribes scientist so well----- 2 timothy 3:7 " ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth."
Good one.
That's right. That's what science is *supposed* to do. We never come to absolute truth, we just find more things to explore and more answers.
It also describes Trinitarians well.
Yes and no. Those not dedicated to nature worship or denial of God have been very fruitful. Who is a scientist? Who is merely wise in his own eyes?
@@BearcatSandor Where did you pull that from? They come up with theories that they often pass off as truth such as evolution. The laws of physics and science were established by the creator...Yehovah.
“You a cousin of bananas?” 😂😂😂
Hey Ray, why Are these grey blocks on the screen? I watched this before and don't remember them being on there.
I love your videos!
He just released in a new video that someone on CZcams did that and it will be reuplaoded soon.
Heres 's Ray's 7 minute compilation with unblurred faces: "Creationist Stumps Evolutionary Professors with ONE Question!"
I am not Ray, I also have a copy of this movie. I think they blocked it with a grey square because of these science PhD. teaches and their science students are making a fool of themselves. They cannot answer any of Ray's questions.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
- Albert Einstein
@Martin Jansen Prove evolution.
@@lordvader3542
He cant
Quote-mining doesn't really mean anything when it's out of context.
@dominionn09 He might not be able to prove evolution, but that doesn't make it any less of an observable fact that you can easily prove to yourself if you're honest.
@@Arena1999
I believe in evolution and God. I don't believe that all we see, hear, taste and touch are a result of an explosion. If you're honest with yourself, you'll agree
@Kyle J Hartman
Well you may have more things to worry about than existence. Thats reading comprehension.
I just found this channel.. that past year my heart has been calling for Jesus in my life.
Be Free, Die Trying:
Jesus died for you
so He wouldn't have to live
without you.
You are on your Way, buddy! Study Scripture daily, and pray to God or Jesus before you open your Bible, asking Them to send The Holy Spirit to enlighten your heart and mind about what you're preparing to read.
My recommendation is this: Read the five chapters of 1st John (that's the 1st epistle of John, not the Gospel of John) over and over until you know you know it. Then begin to study the rest of The Bible. 1st John 1-5 is the perfect overview of the entire message of The Bible.
basic instructions before leaving earth BIBLE !!!
Yay! Jesus loves you!!
Don't let the scoffers and unbelievers shake your faith.
@@ericmoore6769 lol what a stupid comment. Another atheist that acts like theists can't be smart 😂😂
I love how you make people think as you are questioning them. You have quite a gift from God. 🙏
He is a liar from Australia. He lies about real science. Life evolves, whether there is a god or not. The evidence is quite clear.
@@ethelredhardrede1838 what are humans going to evolve into?
@@debbiemartin2026
How am I supposed to know? There is no direction to the process of evolution besides survival.
Besides which we have increasing levels of control of our genes. Which takes us out the loop or at least should do so. It it doesn't it will be because we killed ourselves.
@@ethelredhardrede1838 our genetic material is breaking down not getting better. That refutes evolution.
@@debbiemartin2026
So a false claim you made up refutes evolution. No. If you mean humans, its not breaking down. Natural selection removes bad changes. Creationists never deal with the whole process. Just a bit at a time to say it cannot happen because, they know what they are talking about.
By the way Jeanson, the guy pushing that, lied to you. He pretends that natural selection does not exist, just like you.
Oh post did not show except in the notification. Likely the same for this, but I will check and break things down.
Good video, but it still annoys me that people don't know words. Using "God" as a cuss word is not "taking the Lord's name in vain." Doing something in vain means to do something, knowing it won't accomplish anything. Praying to God to murder your enemies is taking God's name in vain.
At least, that's what it meant when it was written. It's only more recently that "in vain" became synonymous with disrespect.
Why would u want to use God’s name as a cuss word anyways
@@classified3752 "God" isn't God's name. I've never heard a single person use God's name as a cuss word. Most people don't even know His name.
It's good that his goal was not to embarrass them just to prove a point. He was actually reaching for their souls. Never waste an opportunity because each soul is important.
@@absolstoryoffiction6615 God is not only loving, but He IS Love, He doesn't only give us grace, He IS Grace, so why question or test Him? He cannot lie, because that would be against His nature. The Bible says in Deuteronomy 6:16 "You shall not put the Lord your God to the test, as you tested him at Massah." and again in Luke 4:12 "Jesus answered, It is said: 'Do not put the Lord your God to the test."
@@absolstoryoffiction6615 He did, He sent His Son Jesus Christ to die for all of humanity, knowing that many wouldn't love Him back to accept Him into their hearts. That's the unconditional love and grace of God!!!
@@absolstoryoffiction6615 of course you have that luxury. Jesus died for ALL humanity, so yes that includes you. Since you're an atheist, you believe that nothing created everything, we are highly evolved protoplasm, that evolved in a purposeless universe that doesn't care, and our ancestors were fish. You have no justification for human value, morality, or even purpose in life. We are effectively stardust bumping into stardust. Ultimately, we don't think, we're just fizzing, no choices are possible. The laws of logic don't exist either, because you believe that all that is, was, and ever will be are material things, and the laws of logic are immaterial. If they're material, can you please put them in my hand?
@@absolstoryoffiction6615 That's not true. How did you come to that conclusion? Isaiah 45:5 "I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God. I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me." Isaiah 40:28 "Have you not known? Have you not heard? The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He does not faint or grow weary; his understanding is unsearchable." There is no other gods, so your worldview contradicts the Word of The Living God. I don't believe you're "nothingness" I believe you have value, worth, and purpose, because you're made in the image of God! It's horrific to me to even think that you'd spend eternity without God in hell. The call is this, we have all sinned and we'll have to face God on judgment day. We'll be guilty, but Jesus paid our fine. God can legally let us go, do that which is just, let us live forever with Him, because of the death and resurrection of Jesus. We have to repent and put our trust in Jesus like you trust a parachute. Praying for you and May God open your eyes to the truth!! God bless you 🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️
@@absolstoryoffiction6615 You were made in God's image. Genesis 1:27 "So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them." John 1-3 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made." It's not good to contradict the Word of The Living God. Praying for your salvation 🙏🙏🙏
1 Corinthians 1 (WEB) - 1ይ ቆረንቶስ
20: Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the lawyer of this world? Hasn't God made foolish the wisdom of this world?
21: For seeing that in the wisdom of God, the world through its wisdom didn't know God, it was God's good pleasure through the foolishness of the preaching to save those who believe.
22: For Jews ask for signs, Greeks seek after wisdom,
23: but we preach Christ crucified; a stumbling block to Jews, and foolishness to Greeks,
24: but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God.
Amen.
Amen ♰=♥️ 🛐
amen 🙏🏽
Amen
Amen
Thank you Ray Comfort and the Living Waters team for this awesome video. God bless you. In Jesus name, Amen.
I loved this, thank you 💕
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
@@petermelbourne9722 By definition, science is the study is things inside our world. God is something outside of our world, so your science can’t disprove God.
@@pineapple5541 science doesn't disprove god, having a good think about it disproves god
@@petermelbourne9722 You’ll be sorry
I believe in evolution..I evolved from a filthy sinner..into a born again Christian.
Ameeen
@John Viola I will pray for you
@@darkeen42 says the delusional.
@@darkeen42 Lmao. This has *nothing* to do with this section. Get a life or something. At least *try* to act like your coherent.
And *No* Marx is *Clearly* Atheist. Maybe *You* Don't want to associate with *Him.*
@@darkeen42 Well *Yes* It originated via Christian and Pre Christian Civilizations of Europe.
That Said, No One is Complaining when Christians Are being persecuted unfairly by both the Romans and Jews alike. But when the *Same* Thing Happens to the Jews or what is left of the Pagans if Rome, it's all "No you can't do that!"
A Case Double Standards ain't it? In any case *no* I don't condone Anti Semitism in *any* way. But I won't deny that anti semitism was a development ( an unfortunate one at that ) from Christian and Pre Christian Civilizations of Europe.
But all of this is assuming that Christianity was the original "cause" for it. While I won't deny that Christianity contributed to it via the phenomenon of anti semitism receiving institutionalization within European Christianity. It has been expressed in Ancient Greece and the Roman Empire, Possibly before Christianity Got Saved by Constantine.
So the idea of anti semitism has been in circulation even before Christianity hit it big. And even then, it's unfortunate that Christianity made the prejudice worse. But compared to the Holocaust ( Again, Hitler is *not* a Catholic, not anymore ), we should be glad that those Jews Pre Holocaust didn't suffer worse fates then... Well the Holocaust.
That said: *Why* are we discussing this *here!*
Come on! At least *try* to act Mature. Let alone Coherent.
Jesus appeared to me in a radical way and transformed my life forever , thanks for the video
Jason Merkel amen brother...he’s real!! hell is real and heaven is real. The bible makes so much sense
Jesús it's real, but this video isn't, the evolution exists
Amen 🙏
dont you mean jeshua?
@@halogen5580 no we dont we mean jesus 🙏🏼🙏🏿
Hey Ray, do you know what a sophist is?
I really hope Ray answers....
Clue : a mirror could help.
What's the blurred square for?
7:44
Ray:"So what have the bacteria become?"
Woman: "A new kind of bacteria."
Ray: "Still bacteria."
Woman: Understandable, have a nice day
What has this plant become?
A new plant.
Understandable.
There's so much variety. Just because bacteria are all microscopic doesn't make them all one kind lmao. Lazy arguing
@Edward The Booble Define theory.
@@surrealcereal948 You can't expect someone to officially proclaim it as an evidence unless proven unanimously, that's why in every research project there's aways an hypothesis that may or may not answer the theories. And so basically to correct your ideas, a theory is considered a prediction, or an inferred statement to be exact. It could either be supported or denied that's why it's STILL a theory today due to what professional scientists may call it "The Missing Link".
Though mostly, researchers are always been so bias with their research just to prove a point that's not there. Take it from me to be exact, a researcher working on robotics. The theory of evolution had always been so bias during it's rise due to many "explorers" that considered a random bone or teeth of a mammal as an evidence to the theory just to prove a point and not just intellectual honesty. (Arkell, I.E., 2015 upon her supported statements of "The Nebraska Man")
In 1843 for example, Bouch de Perthes found a man made flint-tool and instantly took it as an "evidence" even though he only claimed the tool and not the remained skeletons of a primitive man.
@@surrealcereal948 Its a shame how common place the misunderstanding of the word "theory" is. It doesn't mean belief like many of these people think.
@@surrealcereal948 Genuinely, I did not visit or proclaimed any creation articles. As usual, bias between intellectual honesty and are just there to prove a point. You can't expect a mind of an evolutionist to have a sincere intellectual honesty rather than evolution. (Lew, 2013)
Previous Paleontologists discovering the southern ape "lucy" AUTOMATICALLY ASSUMED that she came from an evolutionary timeline between apes and humans and they AUTOMATICALLY PROCLAIMED an hypothesis that she is the "missing link".
People always ask questions like "why God made evil", or "why God made hell?". We need to talk all day long to describe why and at the end, nothing will change. But if you truly ask and seek God, something will change.
evil exists because of our free will. talking from rather pessimistic view we are a big experiment to see what creatures with this level of intelligence will do if given the optio to do what ever
Is the blurred square an editing error by Ray or is that CZcams?
I am not an evolution defender, and I belive in God, but after watching this video, I wondered that some evolutionists would do the question "but how do you explain that all living beings share the same DNA, wich is evidence that evolution is true?" and I wouldn't know what to answer.
pretty good talk thoguh, great way to spread Jesus's gosplel! keep working on that!
Why would all life that's not related have to have 0% dna similarity/ If two living things have eyes, why would there not be some amount of dna similarity because of that? Science is about the repeatable portion of reality, not things like common descent evolution that contradict repeatable reality, can only be believed in, and they call reasons to believe in it 'evidence'.
The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by,
no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations",
no matter how much "change in allele frequencies",
no matter how much "development of new species",
no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals",
no matter how much "adaptation",
no matter how much "mutation",
no matter how much "speciation",
no matter how much "migration",
no matter how much "genetic drift",
no matter how much "insert other claims here"
no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of:
fish remain fish
amphibians remain amphibians,
canines remain canines,
felines remain felines,
reptiles remain reptiles,
birds remain birds,
viruses remain viruses,
animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs
animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts
animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes
animals that never had brains do not evolve brains
animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths
living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system
animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on.
There are many more such groups.
Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science.
Evolutionist can never address these facts - many unfortunately just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're seem to be really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
@@ForumLight 🤨
@@ForumLight "Why would all life that's not related have to have 0% dna similarity/ If two living things have eyes, why would there not be some amount of dna similarity because of that? " thats not how genetics work. Genes dont always have physical alterations of an organism, you can trace these physically altering genes alongside other genes which activate them to create a family tree.
They all have the same Creator
@@LouAnnBagnall I know, but for evolutionists saying "they just have the same creator" is not enough... they want evidence about genetics, that all life is related
You had them all rethinking their beliefs, I pray that they continue to do their own reading. We need more followers of Christ doing this.
Didn't he, amen and praise God.
Bill D 😂😂😂😂
I believe in God you can see his work everywhere you look
Bru
Yes sure, covid 19, Ebola, malaria, dengue, bubonic plague, earth quakes, floods, droughts, famines which kill millions of innocent men, women, children and innocent unborn in mothers wombs, YES for sure I can see thhe lovely god around me with his wonderful creation. Only the blind and thhe brainwashed cant see, on what an irony!!!
@@bdmiller1204 prove Satan exist! If you make claims then you must prove it and do it. The burden of proof is on you now! We are waiting for your proof. Then prove God and prove Jesus is the Son of God too. Over to you the delusionals
@@bdmiller1204 It is just collection of fictions written by men. It does not prove anything. Then prove the Bible is true! I also have lots of books that claim to be true!
@@bdmiller1204 When you claim the Bible as the fact then you have to prove it it is your call.
Why would this video be so offensive to take it down?
They put it back up.
@@LivingWaters That is awesome to read. Thank you for telling me!
What’s with CZcams blurring out some of the faces? One of the professors faces isn’t blurred out in the beginning of the video but it is later in the video. Wow CZcams grow a spine will ya?
Einstein: "In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views."
Vladimir Mladenov unfortunate that a man as smart as Einstein couldn’t recognise the difference between design and nature.
"I never said most of the quotes attributed to me on the Internet." - Albert Einstein
Einstein had a limited mind ? you say ?
Vladimir Mladenov A handwritten missive by Albert Einstein known as the “God letter” fetched almost $3m at auction in 2018. In it Einstein says: “The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.”
So what ! ....what's your point ?
Ray I wish you’d randomly come across my Mum and Brother sometime. They can’t hear these things from me, it just turns into an argument.
Same for me sadly
amalia amalia think the saddest part about it from my personal situation is my brother is a PHD Biologist at the best university in the UK, if he can understand these things and make those internal adjustments, he could be a powerful voice for our community.
I find the same predicament with my mom.
Wait so you don’t believe in evolution?
Solomon King Oftenimes it's hard for family members to receive certain truths from other family members. One option is to show them these types of videos. Another option is to pray that God Jehovah will send anointed laborers across their paths to minister to them.
@youtube why did you remove this video after 8 years?
czcams.com/video/uc_W9VtzJ0A/video.html
It's so sad that there are still people who think that evolution is not real.
Hello. It's so sad that people think common descent from a first cell is real. Ask them to cite a reproducible case of population of living things that never had brains 'evolving' brains over generations. Same for eyes, or ears, or hearts, or lungs, or digestive systems and so much more. They can't because it's contrary to all of science, all of biology and all of reality. Be not deceived, friend. When we face God for a lifetime of lying, stealing, lusting, hating, blaspheming and more, it won't work to say "well how was I supposed to know?". I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any religion or church has claimed they say.
what do you mean by evolution? if by evolution you mean adaptation/speciation within each family, nobody hasa problem with this, if you mean common ancestry between families, that is a heavily outdated idea from 19th century western europe that has no basis on reality
didn’t you watch the video?
@@lookherekook1258Bruh did you think the video includes any kind of 'sense'?
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
This man is a savage. 😂 using their own words against themselves
If by savage, you mean lacking in proper arguments and relying on false premises and emotion; then you might be on to something
Real World Games how do you know they are false? They couldn’t even answer a question that is necessary to evolution. He said something like how come fish aren’t not fish anymore or something like that.
Anders Norrvik what dishonesty?
Anders Norrvik where does he say that?
He just does not understand evolution
Atheists: Why would I believe a 3000 year old book???
Also Atheists: Take a look at what happened 65 million years ago
No, Edward - these "dates" are based upon assumptions piled upon assumptions. Here's *proof* that evolutionists can only ignore: Fossils "dated" up to 100 MILLION years continue to be found with the remains of red blood cells and soft tissue, which only lasts thousands of years, proving those dates are a farce. Rocks created mere decades ago sent to secular labs and return with "dates" of up to a million years, proving even those dates are a farce. Pointing to scientists being Christians as your defense only shows how anti-science these claims are - science needs no such defense. Science is about things that happen in real time: observable, repeatable, verifiable - not instead made up beliefs that can only be believed in and are not reproducible. The topics of the origin of the universe, the origin of life, the origin of all biological diversity of life are beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
As far as their belief in common descent from a first life form evolution belief, here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by,
no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations",
no matter how much "change in allele frequencies",
no matter how much "development of new species",
no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals",
no matter how much "adaptation",
no matter how much "mutation",
no matter how much "speciation",
no matter how much "migration",
no matter how much "genetic drift",
no matter how much "insert other claims here"
no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of:
fish remain fish
amphibians remain amphibians,
canines remain canines,
felines remain felines,
reptiles remain reptiles,
birds remain birds,
viruses remain viruses,
animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs
animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts
animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes
animals that never had brains do not evolve brains
animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths
living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system
animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on.
There are many more such groups.
Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science.
Evolutionist can never address these facts - many then just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
That aside, I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any church or any religion or anyone has claimed they say and sincerely consider yet again for ourselves. Judgment is coming for us all for our lifetime of sinning AND refusing God's offer to forgive and forget in the person of Jesus Christ. But religions also twist God's truth to make people think it's their religion and system of rules that makes them right with God when it's about a person: Jesus Christ, and choosing to have a relationship with Him, having a change of mind about living for the world and turning back towards God/ Jesus Christ.
John 3 : 14-21 *_"[Jesus said] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up [i.e., on the cross]: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved [exposed]. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."_*
@Edward The Booble Are you saying the Bible lacks evidence? For one you can't solely base your understanding on science for it is a single source for knowledge. If you do some research you'll find the Bible is quite historically accurate, so much so that archaeologists have used it with great success. And you must understand that whole millions of years thing is only a theory, which not all scientists agree with. Also I'm not sure what reliable dating method you're referring to but none of them have been proven 100% reliable. My point isn't that nonbelievers are somehow lesser than the opposition, I simply pointed out that it is a common mistake for them to make bold claims from a place of misunderstanding.
Yes you believe books written by Charles Darwin from way back in the olden times. Hypocritical much?
Whats so hard to understand about that?
czcams.com/video/dYK22EeN-kM/video.html&ab_channel=DavidButler 8:00 Its not so hard to understand...
Oh, a book is evidence ?
65 million years ago, is observed.
I dont believe in a man in the sky..
Seriously?
A being with unfathomable power,
Controls time, the complex design of every cell and of animals.
The very universe itself is no accident.
As wise i am, i gave up thinking for myself. I surrendered because God's method is way way superior than my own that i could ever come up with
Well whatever. Everyone will face God and be reminded how he manifested and called on us many times i feel like
why is there blurred squares on the screen. I have seen this in the past and they were not there
I got converted by this, thank you....
Converted to what Dev ?
Theism or Evolutionism/Atheism ?
@@misanthropytilldeath7005 theism
@@devshah2939 Nice to hear Dev 👍
Jesus died for us sinners. God speaks through the Bible.
Praise God.
I should go to america... I am just a average guy in europe but I would be a genius in america.
Pharoah Akhenaten if he’s an idiot what makes it hard to prove him wrong?
6 Years later:
Bro get into this country we need help
@@elijahrivera4479 WORD
Hahaha me too😂😂
Poop Corporation TM joe mama
1:11 Did you actually hire Kevan Brighting for this? That's kinda cool. :D
Since when is there squares blocking some of the content. I have watched this video around 5 times and never noticed it before 🤔
28K bitter Atheists disliked this video because they simply can't accept their loss.
Agreed. They're just salty because their faulty BELIEFS were exposed in under 30 minutes.
So true! It takes more faith to NOT believe in God than to believe in Him.
Speaking of losing, I can't even think of a time when an Atheist has ever won, and I've watched & read dozens of debates between the two. I don't blame them for being such an angry group lol.
In a chance universe there is no reason to expect there to be logic. Even if we grant its existence, your worldview cannot account for its properties. Given that the universe is in a continual state of change, why should laws of logic be exempt? We all assume that they will be the same tomorrow, but this belief is unwarranted in your worldview. The existence and properties of laws of logic are unjustified in the secular worldview. And hence, any belief based on them is also unjustified. In using them, you are stealing from the Christian worldview.
I have heard that socialists call others what they are and reverse truth for their agenda.
If the scientific method can't be applied then it isn't science.
It is science. We can observe evolution through evidence. Bacteria speciation is proof of descent with modified, it is observable even within a human lifetime.
@Jaren Groves can you first define what a kind is? Is it a species? A kingdom? Genus? What is it? Nobody seems to know what kind means, probably because it is meant to be vague.
@Jaren Groves no that is not specific enough because a cat and a dog are in the same kingdom, while a toad and a chicken are in different kingdoms (amphibians and birds). You are going to have to be more specific than that.
@Jaren Groves okay so I'll assume you mean a kingdom.
I change of kingdom or "kind" is not possible. All birds share a common ancestor from reptiles, in fact this fossil was named Archaeopteryx. So if you observe it's bone structure, it is similar to the reptiles of that time period (millions of years ago) but also shows characteristics of modern birds, (ie. Feathers, extremely light bones, and primitive wing appendages.) It is safe to conclude that based on the genotyping/phenotyping of this dinosaur, that this represents prehistoric reptiles diverging into what we recognize to today as birds. Even today, we know that birds diverged from reptiles through the use of sequenckng whole genomes of bird/reptile dna and we can see that they are consistently more related than ANY OTHER LIVING ORGANISMS.
Hopefully I answered the question? Maybe anti-evolution people should find a better argument against evolution.
To clarify what I said in the beginning, a change of kingdom is not possible, it simply cannot happen in one generation ( or even thousands!) It take millions of years for the divergences to be noticed. Such is the case for birds and reptiles.
Hello there is an error in the video. There is a little blur square floating around.
Why are the faces blurred now? They weren't originally..
He just released in a new video that someone on CZcams did that and it will be reuplaoded soon.
@@puritanpioneer1646
Heres 's Ray's 7 minute compilation with unblurred faces : "Creationist Stumps Evolutionary Professors with ONE Question!"
Heres 's Ray's 7 minute compilation with unblurred faces: "Creationist Stumps Evolutionary Professors with ONE Question!"
“Can you name a famous atheist”
“Ya my dad”
“But he’s not famous”
“Hehehehehehe”
😂😂😂😂😂😂
people laugh to cover up their lies sometimes
Pineapplaplatypotamus I know but his laugh sounded so stupid 😂😂😂
I can list many.
@@CptGravel indeed, there are plenty, and they are often quite eloquent.
This video makes my heart break for these people who are so clearly being deceived by this world. 10:20 through 13:42 is all you need to watch here to see that this community has no more definitive answer for the miracle of life than we do as believers. The major difference in these two belief systems is directly correlated to the level of pride we have in our own understanding of this universe. I was an agnostic/borderline atheist for the first 23 years of my life until I finally humbled myself and began to see the truth that there is indeed an intelligent being far beyond the capacity of our own comprehension as mere human beings. John 9:39 “Then Jesus told him, "I entered this world to render judgment--to give sight to the blind and to show those who think they see that they are blind."
tim rose I’m truly sorry that you feel this way but Christians have no reason to be “dishonest” when it comes to evangelism. What benefit would it bring to us whether or not you choose to believe in God? Ray is only seeking to spread the truth to people so they may be saved and brought into eternal life. Evolution is an extremely flawed theory and that is becoming more and more evident today through science itself. I suggest you check out the interview with biochemist Michael Behe on the new science about DNA that challenges evolution (Darwin Devolves)
Dave Littleton Michael Behe is not considered a reliable source. Watch his dismissal as a creationist during the Dover trials than outlawed intelligent design as religion. Yes, Ray is a charlatan and ridiculed as the banana man. His editing and stupidity of his questions was laughable. There is no such thing as a kind!
tim rose you say he is “not considered” a reliable source, and yet what does that really mean? He is not considered reliable by whose standard? The evolutionist community? Well of course he isn’t because his research refutes everything that they stand for and believe in when it comes to the origin of life. It is actually laughable to me how arrogant a person must be to claim that their worldview around evolution is superior to that of intelligent design. Scientists don’t even have a clue what 95% of our universe truly consists of (aka dark energy and dark matter) but we somehow think it’s reasonable to entirely rule out the possibility of a divine creator. Believe what you may my friend, but I pray that one day you might let go of your pride just as I did so God can reveal himself to you
tim rose well I guess we can agree to disagree on this topic. Wishing you all the best
Evolutionary Biology and the Bible Genetics and Darwinism are independent ideologies. I never made an argument against genes being real
What's with the blank square?
Thats what I'm wondering
Missing links?
They are all over the place.
Not true. Evolutionists think if you look at fossils and make up a belief about them that never happens, it nevertheless makes the fossil an "observation" or "evidence" of the belief they made up about them. Anti-science circular reasoning. Same for dna similarity and beliefs they make up ABOUT it.
Evolutionist "That's a transitional fossil - and here are reasons I believe it is"
"How do you know it is?"
Evolutionist "Because common descent from a first life form evolution is true"
"How do you know it's true when it never happens?"
Evolutionist "Because that's a transitional fossil - and here are reasons I believe it is"
(repeat)
Evolutionist "DNA similarity shows this and that are cousins - and here are reasons I believe it shows that!"
"How do you know it does?"
Evolutionist "Because common descent from a first life form evolution is true"
"How do you know it is true when it never happens?"
Evolutionist "Because DNA similarity shows this and that are cousins - and here are reasons I believe it shows that!"
(repeat)
It would be similar to the analogy of someone else making up a brand new (unrelated to evolution) belief like "populations of trees morphed over generations eventually into human beings" and claiming fossilized tree branches and DNA similarity between tree branches and humans are "evidence" or "observations" of it, and it would be just as much of an anti-science farce.
If there were initially multiple life forms that led to all life we see today, then large groups of life would in no way be related yet they'd still have some degree of dna similarity, some degree of visible similarity in their fossils, which also shows making assumption about dna similarity or fossils as if it means life is related with a common ancestor is circular reasoning and anti-science.
The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
+ *ForumLight* *"Evolutionists think if you look at fossils and make up a belief about them that never happens"*
source?
God is the intelligent designer. The painting never questions the artist.
+ *james* And yet we humans do. Might go to show how we're not so similar to paintings.
@@demiligne3456 There's reasons as to why it's questioned, I don't know if you've ever read the Bible but it's said that Satan fills people with doubts of God, for all we know, he could have fed Darwin the theory about Evolution without revealing himself to start this whole Evolution vs God argument.
Why do fossils exist then
@@tylerscampinghuntingandsur4957 thats the most stupid thing i have ever heard.
"Satan was the one who tricked Darwin into coming up with evolution"
Was he also the one who planted fossils and was also the one who gave us all the other evidence to support it?
You guys seriously come up with the most stupid arguments to back your beliefs
Humans are not paintings lmao. You are PRESUPPOSING design where none shows or were ever needed to explain anything.
May our dear father GOD the 1 and only true God continue to protect and bless you Ray Comfort. Your faith is powerful & much appreciated. Never stop doing GOD'S work. God bless you now&forever.
GOD bless you too...❤️❤️❤️❤️
no
I’m confused. If God is the one and only true god. Then what does that make Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit?
@@abdelll9737 That is his forms. The Leader, the messenger and the Provider
Oh well maybe he forgot all those poor children suffering from hunger and decease. All of those people that have died from covid too. But he will protect Ray then everything is good. Sure.
Facts vs Fiction
Evolution vs a book made by the hands of ignorant men thousands of years ago in a time we didn’t even know how rain or waves were made.
And yet those 'ignorant' men wrote about dozens of facts about reality that there's no way mankind could have known and scientists could not figure out for up to thousands of years later, proving its divine origin and leaving us without excuse before God for a lifetime of lying, stealing, lusting, hating, blaspheming and more. Re-read the gospels yet again, friend - there are only two religions in the world: countless versions of "DO this or that and you (might) be saved from heII" and God's truth of "it is DONE on the cross and we just receive it by faith," which will be followed up with a change of mind about sin and a desire to live for God.
*_For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life._*
John 3:16
*_He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:_*
John 1:10-12
@@ForumLight No proof of god, how about you go get a life instead of constantly refreshing comment to reply to people who don’t believe in a hypocritical man in the sky?
@@TrulyMorningstar I'm not calling my belief science. Evolutionists are calling their science fiction common descent from a first life form science.
Science is about the repeatable portion of reality, not things like common descent evolution that contradict repeatable reality, can only be believed in, and they call reasons to believe in it 'evidence'.
The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by,
no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations",
no matter how much "change in allele frequencies",
no matter how much "development of new species",
no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals",
no matter how much "adaptation",
no matter how much "mutation",
no matter how much "speciation",
no matter how much "migration",
no matter how much "genetic drift",
no matter how much "insert other claims here"
no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of:
fish remain fish
amphibians remain amphibians,
canines remain canines,
felines remain felines,
reptiles remain reptiles,
birds remain birds,
viruses remain viruses,
animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs
animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts
animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes
animals that never had brains do not evolve brains
animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths
living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system
animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on.
There are many more such groups.
Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science.
Evolutionist can never address these facts - many unfortunately just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're seem to be really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any religion, church, denomination claims they say. We'll all face God for a lifetime of lying, stealing, lusting, hating, coveting, blaspheming and more. There are only two religions in the world to address this: Countless versions of "DO this or that and you (might) be saved" and God / Jesus Christ's truth of "It is DONE by Jesus the Christ on the cross and we believe on Him along to be saved - received by faith - and what goes along with it that God does (that shows us our 'faith' is genuine) is we have a change of mind and a change of desires about sin and a new desire to instead follow God.
@@TrulyMorningstar And sure there's proof of God. Scientists and engineers prove it every time they try to mimic the designs in nature and fall short because we're not smart enough. If they manage to succeed in making good designs they COPIED from nature, they show nature is proof of intelligence.
And information and instructions on how to build something are proof of an intelligence that created it - scientific fact. It's observable, repeatable, verifiable fact that information and instructions only comes from intelligence. Yet information and instructions encoded in our DNA makes our most advanced computer programs look like a joke - instructions and information on how to build organic machines, more than the biggest Encyclopedia set. But also a mechanism that can decode these instructions and act on them to do what they say to actually build the organic machines with eyes to see, ears to hear, brains to think, hearts to pump blood, blood to be pumped, reproductive systems, immune systems, skeletal systems and so much more.
When we first saw Stonehenge, it was clearly proof of intelligence - no one would be foolish enough to claim even such a crude circular arrangement "just happened". Yet we look at the entire universe, galaxies, solar systems, stars, suns, planets, moons, mathematically precise laws of nature and in the biggest display of willful ignorance, contrary to even Stonehenge claim "nothing did it - it just happened".
@@ForumLight All your “proof” are claims with nothing to back them up but instead your own personal and idiotic opinion.
Hey how about I go to your house and kill your family will god stop me? I highly doubt it since he’s done so little yet he “loves” us.
Why are there sections of the film that are blurred out? I saw that in some parts of the film a persons face is blurred out, but in other parts of the film the same person has their face fully and clearly shown. It is very distracting.
Ray Comfort God bless you brother
I think he is now our grandpa
21:26
Who makes the rules?
"We do"
That says it all
Proverbs 1:7
"The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and INSTRUCTION."
@@ambrosebussey4672
Prove it is false
@@ambrosebussey4672
Prove the Bible is false. If you cannot prove the Bible is false then you are going by faith, and you are more gullible then a toddler.
Really? did you decide to be born?. Did you decide that sometime in the next week or so you will drink liquid or you will die?. The rules humans make are social/political/economic etc rules. All this anthroposphere ( human social world) is underpinned by natural laws.e.g. Physics and biology (inc evolution).
Great observation! Plus: you shall not have other gods before Me.
@evo: Yes humans make "rules" Duh, BUT humans can't create squat like your creative, magic lighting bolts into the primordial swamp evolution! / religion! & Why not? Not even a simple life form. Doh. but don't let that discourage you! BUT having Godless government enforced your silly faith base mother Gaia Evolution religion on us the living is shameful !
You can't ask these questions on a college campus nowadays. I NEED A SAFE SPACE!!
Anything that occurs outside of the personal observation of your senses requires faith.
"For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God."
--1 Corinthians 1:18 (ESV)
Ben Meitzen Amen!🙌
daaang, 58 likes and the third comment on a popular video!
You call God the fool then, what this man quoted were not his own words. "The way of a fool is right in his own eyes: but he that hearkeneth unto counsel is wise." Proverbs 12:15 KJV.
My counsel is this, read the 4 gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) and if you've never done so try to pray before reading (It's like talking to a friend). If by those end of those books your eyes have yet to be opened, you can then say at the very least the book has been.
rgsand01 you only have to look into the infinite sky . Day or night. That's infinity. Or you can think that almost every human society throughout time has had a firm belief in God because they were all not as smart as you. Atheists know there is God. It's in us all. Don't hide it. Let it come out. Can't hurt.
Do you feel strong ? how long do you think that strength will last you if you do ? This isn't about church or religion, it's about you, to try to tell people that HAVE EXPERIENCED GOD is like trying to disprove air. THAT is foolishness, what separates the believer and non believer is not just faith, but experience. I personally did not believe matter of fact i said that i hated God because he'd done nothing for me. Took 5 years after that to come to terms that i'm nothing and nobody and that we're all on the same ride to somewhere. You're not a humble person that i can tell, and i'm not judging i'm observing. So one day when life's just a bit too hard you'll call on God.....and mark my words you will. You will be changed, specifically that hard heart of yours. I say this from experience i used to be you, making fun of the believers and existing my way through life miserably. You may be riding that non believing high horse of yours but trust me when i tell you. You will fall off one day, see who comes to help.
Jesus Christ have mercy on all of us!
Amen ✝️🙏
@@osamanagee594 is Jesus Christ!! Not the islam!
@@osamanagee594 He is God. Muhammed is not a Prophet! The last Prophet was Saint John the Baptist!
@@osamanagee594 let me ask you; do you consider the religion of islam to be one of love?
@@osamanagee594 so please explain love to me by islamic standards. What is love?
Hey RAY, Theres a horrible blurred square on the video.
5:34 Great job blurring the face
😂
"Human Beings are fish?"
"Yes of course"
lol
Mermaids. LOL!
If humans evolved from fish , we would have kept the gills , like The Man From Atlantis !
@Andrew Davis
God made Adam and Eve. Humans are from them.
For it was You who created my inward parts; You knit me together in my mother’s womb.
Psalms 139:13 HCSB
@Andrew Davis
Just under 6,000 yrs ago.
Satan is the king of lies
Aborigines are human
descendants of Adam and Eve
Andrew Davis aboriginals could have been exiled from ancient civilizations
Comfort said that Darwin said 'i have never been an atheist'.
QUOTE MINE ALERT!!!
Darwin actually said "In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God.- I think that generally (& more and more so as I grow older) but not always, that an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind."
Darwin was being intellectually honest, he couldn't deny there is a God as he can't prove it, but he is agnostic as there is no reason to believe in God.
OK so he was an agnostic.
How does that contradict Comfort's claim that Darwin was not an atheist? Simple logic.
So...In Darwin's own words, he's not an atheist. What is your point hahaha!?
"yea, my dad. Heheheheheheh" 🤣 that killed me 😂 I would highfive him after that 😁
"This video is unavailable on this device. "
czcams.com/video/uc_W9VtzJ0A/video.html
Sums it all up: "I normally don't debate with creationists cause it is not good for my blood pressure".
Meaning, some people become sick when hearing the truth.
We do accept the facts, which is why we reject evolution. The only fairy tale here is imagining long long ago, there was some fish and over lots and lots of time they became human.
I have heard a different fairy tale. It was long long time ago there was a person living. He/she wrote a fantasy book that everyone liked. Then some people added some more great chapters. There is one part I like about that book. It tells you to drink wine. Lots of wine. After you are totally waisted you might actually believe in this fairy tale.
Oh yes Some became sub-human like yourself and reverted back to blind fish swimming in a sea of truth ... FOOL !!
Oh yes.. And some became sub-human like yourself and reverted back to fish swimming in a sea of obvious truth .. FOOL !!!
Evolution teachers- 'Did God really say?'
Me- 'Yes, God really did say!"
Praise God
Me too cause is illogical than nothing.
Bacteria are still bacteria. They've never "evolved" into a more complex life form, not into a higher kingdom. Everything looks stagnant to me.
@@quasimobius Yes,bacteria and multicellular life have a common ancestor(in the first ever cell),that's what evolution means,not things completly changing,but life becoming more complex,changing a little bit over time.
Edit:Evolution at least makes sense,unlike creationism,also do you believe in the 6000 year old earth?
Harry ,just Harry how does that make more sense than creation? You can’t observably proof evolution. Evolution is a belief created and accepted by people who simply DON’T want to believe in God.
@@globalcoupledances lol, 7 million? That's not human.
I don't understand why their faces are blurred now. They sign the release forms so legally Living Waters can show their face as long as they want.
ya its weird.
"not recently" - Grandma's a savage
I believe God created the Universe 🙏🏼❤️
Believing in things doesn't make them true.
Stephen Muga never said they do
@@itzdiva7914 *sighs* You don't understand logic, do you?
@@itzdiva7914 Please continue basking in your ignorance
@@itzdiva7914 It's too late for that, don't you think?
Lord, may the scales fall from their eyes. Amen.
Christianity and other semitic subversion is the very definition of having scales on ones' eyes.
@@finnicpatriot6399 Haha, so you're telling my science and its extremely questionable theory's are correct?
Yes
And remove the mote from your own eye before you note a splinter in the eye of another.
@Art Alvarez I have, that's why I follow the path of my pagan ancestors.
There's a blurred out square that lasts for several minutes. You guys should fix it. In the video.
What’s up with the blur face that appears on everyone starting minute 5:30
It would’ve been good if Ray also asked them when asked about the neighbour and dog drowning scenario, if what if it was them in the water drowning, how would they feel if someone saved the dog over them... it’s easy for people to think someone else has less worth, but when it’s them, guaranteed they place a higher value on their life.
I was thinking that as well. I am sure they would rethink their answer.
Absolutely!!
Yea I remember the first time I watched this video I was shocked. But then I realized a lot of people think like that. Very sad.
Yes I do love dogs and I don't love my neighbors, but I would save my neighbor first and then I will save the dog. First love God then love your neighbor is what the bijbel says (that is the second and is just as important says Jesus), but I live in a bad neighborhood and I hope that my neighbors will think the same way about it if I am drowning. I do know that they love there dog, so they could not be real bad people.
This is what Jesus says in Matthew 22 vers 34-40 34 Hearing that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, the Pharisees got together. 35 One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”
37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[c] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[d] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”
So save your Neighbor first, and after that if you got time left to can do it save the dog.
Let God be true if every men has to be proven a liar!!!!!!!!!!
@@Facts-Over-Feelings What?! No it wasn't
lol. Not that it matters but there is no "if" in that quote from Romans 3.... Every man is a liar and God is true.
@@rwatson2609 it does matter! Don't change a dot or a tittle!
We actually share 50% of DNA w/ bananas and 97% w/ Chimpanzees. This isn’t disputable, it’s a proven fact. This shows a high possibility of a common ancestor. If creatism is true, then these DNA coding similarities presented by god have got the be the biggest troll ever.
A A Actually, if you payed attention in biology class, you’d hear about genetic similarities. It was Stephen Woodford.
Do people who don't believe in evolution think we just grew out the ground or parachuted in from space ? please enlighten me
Do you monetize your videos?
In their wisdom they become fools. Love this. Thank you.
Lol yeah that Steve jobs guy, Bill gates & the others are all fools. Hah
@Edward The Booble Why are you so angry? Like literally every single comment I read, you commented mad at a person because of their opposite views.
Yeah right, im the one before but Now The truth set me free❤
@@anewcreation4667 Because some of us are (rightfully) really sick of people believing in the dumbest things imaginable. Sometimes it's pretty scary to see how dumb people truly are. Science is the way to go, not faith.
@@idontwantahandlethough Yeah yeah yeah and I’ll continue to stick with faith.
the best part about this is that these people will probably think of this every so often and ponder on it.
And notice that Ray was gaslighting them by making up a load of nonsense.
@Jax Callum
" but Ray has convinced me that there may be God. "
By pushing nonsense.
" what if there was no evolution? "
Actual research shows that there is.
" What if something else happened instead of big bang and evolution"
What if apples were oranges and Ray didn't lie? Oh there might have something that is not quite what BB theory is today but it would have to similar to produce the evidence we have. As for evolution, that is part of reality, how is theory, and natural selection fits the evidence.
"but let's not blindly follow everything."
Good, right idea, now stop blindly following Ray. I am not going blind, I am going more than ample evidence. Ray just plain lied about the BB, its NOT everything from nothing because there is no such thing as nothing in our universe. Its human concept, not a part of reality.
Let me get you started in your journey to reality.
How evolution works:
First step in the process.
Mutations happen - There are many kinds of them from single hit changes to the duplication of entire genomes, the last happens in plants not vertebrates. The most interesting kind is duplication of genes which allows one duplicate to do the old job and the new to change to take on a different job. There is ample evidence that this occurs and this is the main way that information is added to the genome. This can occur much more easily in sexually reproducing organisms due their having two copies of every gene in the first place.
Second step in the process, the one Creationist pretend doesn't happen when they claim evolution is only random.
Mutations are the raw change in the DNA. Natural selection carves the information from the environment into the DNA. Much like a sculptor carves an shape into the raw mass of rock. Selection is what makes it information in the sense Creationists use. The selection is by the environment. ALL the evidence supports this.
Natural Selection - mutations that decrease the chances of reproduction are removed by this. It is inherent in reproduction that a decrease in the rate of successful reproduction due to a gene that isn't doing the job adequately will be lost from the gene pool. This is something that cannot not happen. Some genes INCREASE the rate of successful reproduction. Those are inherently conserved. This selection is by the environment, which also includes other members of the species, no outside intelligence is required for the environment to select out bad mutations or conserve useful mutations.
The two steps of the process is all that is needed for evolution to occur. Add in geographical or reproductive isolation and speciation will occur.
This is a natural process. No intelligence is needed for it occur. It occurs according to strictly local, both in space and in time, laws of chemistry and reproduction.
There is no magic in it. It is as inevitable as hydrogen fusing in the Sun. If there is reproduction and there is variation then there will be evolution.
Some books to get you started:
Why evolution is true - Jerry A. Coyne
THIS BOOK IN PARTICULAR to see just how messy and undesigned the chemistry of life is.
Herding Hemingway's Cats: Understanding how Our Genes Work
Book by Kat Arney
This shows new organs evolving from previous organs. Limbs from fins.
Your Inner Fish
Book by Neil Shubin
Wonderful life : the Burgess Shale and nature of history / Stephen Jay Gould
Life on a Young Planet: The First Three Billions Years of Evolution on Earth Andrew H, Knoll
Now evolution is a lot simpler to understand that Big Bang cosmology but if you want books on that I have a few for that as well. Wikipedia covers both quite well and has links to more dense information. Ray make his living promoting his religion learning critical thinking will protect you from snowjobs and fact free nonsense like what Ray uses. A Creationist favorite these days is to simply create a false version of how science works and then lie that if you cannot see something happen today then it never happened and their god did it.
Wikipedia - Critical thinking
Critical thinking is the analysis of facts to form a judgment.[1] The subject is complex, and several different definitions exist, which generally include the rational, skeptical, unbiased analysis, or evaluation of factual evidence. Critical thinking is self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking.[2] It presupposes assent to rigorous standards of excellence and mindful command of their use. It entails effective communication and problem-solving abilities as well as a commitment to overcome native egocentrism[3][4] and sociocentrism.
Ethelred Hardrede
@Axle Parker
They will never learn about reality if they are only exposed to silly nonsense.
@@ethelredhardrede1838 an entire dissertation of “its likely, it’s possible and open to discussion and much debate”. Evolution that claims evidence yet none has been provided. This video thoroughly exposes the absurdity that is evolution. Wikipedia: Uncertainty
@@warrr_machine At least they are willing to consider a different perspective. Unlike most religious people. They fall out with everyone, even those that have a belief in God, but a slightly different take on it. And no one has ever accosted me in the street to drone on about evolution.
Here is my argument. Come to think of it. You will have answers to whatever inconsistencies or contradictions or questions thrown at you by people not in your faith. Now these answers are enough for you but might be illogical to me. And the reverse is true for any one in any other faith. You prescribe to the beliefs of your forefathers. Your ancestors have spread these beliefs just like they were spread to them (assuming you're European or American). This is your culture, something you hold paramount, something you hold to be the absolute truth. The same exact feelings you have towards your faith are true for the Muslim, the Jew, the Hindu, the many African mythologists. Doesn't it bother you that what you hold as the truth is just a mere consequence of the course of history. Had history taken a different course and the Africans were the ones who colonized Europe, chances are you would be subscribing to their beliefs today. Your faith is not any different from any other in the world.
Hello. People have come to faith in Jesus Christ from all backgrounds, all upbringings, all ages, all races, all cultures. So us pretending it's only because we were taught it by our parents is moot.
Secondly, there are 2000 prophesies in the Bible that have come true locally/globally, even up to thousands of years after being written. Other 'religious' texts: none.
In the Bible there are dozens of facts about reality that even scientists could not figure out until up to thousands of years after being written. Other 'religious' texts: none.
The Bible was written over 1500 years through 40 penmen, multiple languages, over three continents, reads as one mind. Every other 'religious' text: one person, one lifetime.
The grave of Christ is empty. The grave of every other 'religion's prophet has their bones.
This won't matter to those determined to reject Christ - but it will leave us all without excuse before God thinking we'll be able to say "well how was I supposed to know?!"
I implore people to re-read the Gospels yet again and forget what any religion / church / commentator claims they say - it will be our own fault if we're deceived by them. God / Jesus Christ did not come here to create a world-wide religious organization - but instead to adopt / save individuals, by faith, that they then live a lifetime of works towards God, joining local congregations (church).
The blur was a bit annoying but I love this