Bhaskara wheel-perpetuum stabile

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 18. 04. 2018
  • Since I became enthusiastic on other videos on youtube I created my own version of Bhaskara wheel. I have employed 18 test tubes filled with 110 g mercury each. The result was total fail. It was wasting time and money only.

Komentáře • 1,8K

  • @Postghost
    @Postghost Před 3 lety +3459

    I've seen a much simpler version of this.
    It's called: A Brick.

    • @wi8shad0w
      @wi8shad0w Před 3 lety +46

      Best comment for this guy !!! ... Less mercury it will take to stare a brick !

    • @AlexM-td3ro
      @AlexM-td3ro Před 3 lety +9

      🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂

    • @bigt6889
      @bigt6889 Před 3 lety +66

      I think the brick would be more impressive and useful

    • @ren4672
      @ren4672 Před 3 lety +22

      It is a more expensive and useless brick

    • @sosukeXkun
      @sosukeXkun Před 3 lety +19

      Not really, if you push a brick it needs the ground friction to stop itself, this does it without external friction

  • @L1Run
    @L1Run Před 3 lety +964

    All machines are perpetually stable if you leave them alone for a while.

    • @tapiocajai
      @tapiocajai Před 3 lety +5

      thats what i was doing. whats the point?

    • @Thatguy-gy3yw
      @Thatguy-gy3yw Před 3 lety +8

      Not if it’s in space

    • @EitBitSF
      @EitBitSF Před 3 lety +8

      @@Thatguy-gy3yw even in space

    • @flynna
      @flynna Před 3 lety +5

      @@EitBitSF but what acts against the force in space, unless you're close enough to be effected by a gravitational pull that much

    • @EitBitSF
      @EitBitSF Před 3 lety +2

      @@flynna You forgot about machine of life that stopped long time ago and no force could ever move it again (._. )

  • @colecarter1844
    @colecarter1844 Před 3 lety +2393

    No one knows how to read lmao. Its a perpetually stable machine, meaning its supposed to stop itself from spinning 🤣🤣

    • @wickandvessel6346
      @wickandvessel6346 Před 3 lety +162

      His title is SARCASM. Just read the comments on his OTHER video. He only made 2. He tried it with water and with Mercury and neither one worked. He thought the water would work so he named it a "PERPETUAL MOTION" machine. Since it didn't work he tried it again with Mercury in a second video. Since that 1 didn't work either he sarcastically named it "perpetuated stabili"

    • @colecarter1844
      @colecarter1844 Před 3 lety +36

      @@wickandvessel6346 well that makes sense lol. Thanks for the insight

    • @wickandvessel6346
      @wickandvessel6346 Před 3 lety +4

      @@colecarter1844
      Welcome.

    • @anaunaga5471
      @anaunaga5471 Před 3 lety +10

      Also it’s in a different language. Sure I could guess what words mean, but guessing isn’t the same as knowing.

    • @christopherleveck6835
      @christopherleveck6835 Před 3 lety +2

      @@wickandvessel6346 could have made one without anything and achieved the exact same result. My brothers BMW has four of those and an extra one in the trunk. They have been stabil since he bought it. That car uses almost no gas.

  • @kartoffelsuppe1184
    @kartoffelsuppe1184 Před 3 lety +880

    its a STABILE and NOT a MOBILE which means it is NOT MOBILE

    • @sourbrothers73
      @sourbrothers73 Před 3 lety +22

      Stop yelling wtf

    • @Sam_Bolic
      @Sam_Bolic Před 3 lety +2

      Thank you sir

    • @tdthedestroyer1232
      @tdthedestroyer1232 Před 3 lety

      @@sourbrothers73 virtually yelling*

    • @lars9805
      @lars9805 Před 3 lety +2

      Isn't a normale wheel perpetual stable too? Oh wait it says stabile

    • @xplodingmojo2087
      @xplodingmojo2087 Před 3 lety

      @@lars9805 if I read the comments here correct: no, a wheel doesn’t stop itself

  • @davidmay9956
    @davidmay9956 Před 3 lety +161

    That’s a scary amount of mercury

    • @Angel_Underscore
      @Angel_Underscore Před 3 lety +7

      Chug

    • @sailor5853
      @sailor5853 Před 3 lety +9

      @@nitropsycho9117 Do you realise how much that amount of gallium would cost?

    • @averygoodfantasticname4206
      @averygoodfantasticname4206 Před 3 lety +3

      Mercury isn't dangerous unless its organic. Watch the chubby emu video on mercury

    • @sailor5853
      @sailor5853 Před 3 lety +4

      @@nitropsycho9117 No, I wouldn't.
      There is a reason mercury have more common applications than gallium, and that's not just the price.

    • @sailor5853
      @sailor5853 Před 3 lety +6

      Alas, that's elemental mercury. That's not bottled death or some shit.

  • @jaredj631
    @jaredj631 Před 3 lety +563

    Homer voice:
    In this house we obey the 2nd law of thermodynamics!

    • @davidfreeman1774
      @davidfreeman1774 Před 3 lety +22

      Conservation of momentum and energy is a bitch lol

    • @HolyEyeWasHere
      @HolyEyeWasHere Před 3 lety +5

      "In this household we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"

    • @wyatt639
      @wyatt639 Před 3 lety +5

      Yeah but its a perpetually stable machine not motion

    • @Errafri
      @Errafri Před 3 lety

      @@wyatt639 I love it! I will definitely reuse that one

    • @wyatt639
      @wyatt639 Před 3 lety +1

      @@Errafri no the name of the video is literally perpetually stable machine. Like the machine isn't trying to move

  • @random4436
    @random4436 Před 3 lety +82

    This is a minute ill never get back. Thank you

  • @tr1p1ea
    @tr1p1ea Před 3 lety +181

    So it's a perpetually stable wheel (stops itself from spinning)?

    • @JamilKhan-hk1wl
      @JamilKhan-hk1wl Před 3 lety +18

      Stable means its will return to its desired state. Thus the wheel will stop after some time. Its not really perpetual motion and the video is just a clickbait

    • @user-bl4oq7fd8d
      @user-bl4oq7fd8d Před 3 lety +13

      @@JamilKhan-hk1wl perpetual motion is clickbait in itself

    • @matess3655
      @matess3655 Před 3 lety +2

      @@JamilKhan-hk1wl Nobody said anything about perpetual *motion* though. Only perpetual stability.

    • @Shiznittlebizbampop1
      @Shiznittlebizbampop1 Před 3 lety +2

      @@JamilKhan-hk1wl it may or may not be clickbait. Because this is an exact replica of Bhaskara's Wheel. That's the oldest document we have talking about the idea of a perpetual motion machine and the author is Bhaskara, all the way back from the 12th century (That's the years anywhere between 1101 and 1200)

    • @MattH-wg7ou
      @MattH-wg7ou Před 3 lety +2

      Dont regular wheels do this too?
      Yes. Yes they do.

  • @capt_coffins4651
    @capt_coffins4651 Před 3 lety +770

    *My brain:* SPIN IT AS HARD AS YOU CAN!!!
    *Me:* Why?
    *My brain:* JUST DO IT!!!

  • @matsuiflex
    @matsuiflex Před 3 lety +411

    You're supposed to zoom in until the hand that's pushing is out of frame

  • @gen4171
    @gen4171 Před 3 lety +218

    So this is the most useless machine on this planet?

    • @jjones503
      @jjones503 Před 3 lety +4

      The nothing grinder is far more useless.

    • @lok4890
      @lok4890 Před 3 lety +10

      The machine that turns itself off?

    • @vizender
      @vizender Před 3 lety +11

      Nop, stable machines can be useful, thx to their high mechanic energy dissipating potential, without creating to much heat.
      Obviously they won’t be use in cars and stuff like that because they can’t be efficiently turned on and off, but if you want something like to turn at a certain maximum speed like a windmill, or more probably a water mill for exemple, you can use that.

    • @whiteboyskatez3827
      @whiteboyskatez3827 Před 3 lety +2

      @@lok4890 I've never heard of a nothing grinder but its not the same as a useless machine and I bet its less useless than the useless machine because the useless machine uses up batteries while doing nothing

    • @lok4890
      @lok4890 Před 3 lety +1

      @@whiteboyskatez3827 what? I was talking about a machine, that when you flip the switch on, it switches it off

  • @jurajvalko8406
    @jurajvalko8406 Před 3 lety +6

    why are all the coments complaining about it not creating a perpetual motion? i mean i think the word stabile is pretty importamt in the title suggesting that its not perpetum mobile=spinning endlessly but its stabile=not spinning at all... i thought the video is supposed to be a joke...

    • @dingodave89
      @dingodave89 Před 3 lety

      It's because the guy actually tried to create a perpetual motion machine. If you can access the video description you'll see this

  • @michaelfriedl5866
    @michaelfriedl5866 Před 3 lety +69

    Good design, really. You are so close! The reason for it not perpetually rotating is the base plate being placed on a level surface. It needs to be tilted at a >5 degrees (Fahrenheit if available, else Reaumur) angle, so the wheel thinks it's going downhill. Then you should add one drop of premium snake oil in each test tube to reduce friction in the mercury. Replace oil every leap year.

    • @muadzazri752
      @muadzazri752 Před 3 lety +5

      Isn't perpetual Machine only theoretical to begin with?

    • @bencharron2628
      @bencharron2628 Před 3 lety +18

      @@muadzazri752 He was clearly trolling

    • @xxwhiteboy420x4
      @xxwhiteboy420x4 Před 3 lety +4

      @@muadzazri752 yes there against the laws of physics

    • @muadzazri752
      @muadzazri752 Před 3 lety +1

      @@bencharron2628 lel. I forgot to read to lower half of it.

    • @michaelfriedl5866
      @michaelfriedl5866 Před 3 lety +3

      @@muadzazri752 They are theoretically impossible, as stated in the laws of thermodynamics. The latters describe empirical facts and it's not easy to wrap one's head around it, especially when it comes to entropy. Some motions are perpetual, right? Orbits of celestial objects never decay. Well, they do not unless there is some sort of friction which means exchange of energy. Our earth moon's orbit increases each year by appr. 1 1/2 in. That is due to the friction loss in the tidal movements of the oceans, resulting in energy depletion in the earth-moon system. Nothing lasts forever...

  • @user-xb7tb9rz4j
    @user-xb7tb9rz4j Před 3 lety +100

    This was the least satisfying thing I've ever watched. I hope you're proud of yourself.

    • @xjosephjoestar
      @xjosephjoestar Před 3 lety +3

      Its Not supposed to satisfy its a wheel which stops itsself from Spinning

    • @thedude7082
      @thedude7082 Před 3 lety +3

      Agreed. I know its scientific but it was still stupid

    • @Legion88able
      @Legion88able Před 3 lety +4

      @@xjosephjoestar ALL wheels stop themselves spinning eventually. What’s new

    • @xjosephjoestar
      @xjosephjoestar Před 3 lety +5

      @@Legion88able No they Stop because of the friction and Not because the wheel stops. In a World without friction wheels would spin endless but this one stops.

    • @thedude7082
      @thedude7082 Před 3 lety

      Well fuck you...says 6 beer in

  • @clintflippo917
    @clintflippo917 Před 3 lety +5

    All the people saying this would never work are missing the point. It obviously won't. But perpetual motion machines are a fascinating topic of mechanical history and this is a beautifully built replica of what someone once tried to build in search of perpetual motion. That's the point.

    • @sosukeXkun
      @sosukeXkun Před 3 lety

      It works just perfectly, just read the title more carefully because at least you are not one of the people who call this just a perpetuall machine but a perpetuall MOTION so that means you know what those words mean

  • @Horvath_Gabor
    @Horvath_Gabor Před 3 lety +14

    At first I thought this would be something like a Newton's Cradle, where the energy-transfer efficiency would be so high that in the short term it would look like the movement would never stop, hence a stable system. Instead it was stable because it was stationary. Well played.

  • @2Damnsmartt
    @2Damnsmartt Před 3 lety +91

    Why don't we take a moment to appreciate he drilled all those holes in that disc without breaking it even once.
    A true Chad he is!!

    • @vizender
      @vizender Před 3 lety +4

      I’m pretty sure it’s not glass, but plastic.
      But still, he made quite a nice contraption and must have put a lot of efforts into it !

    • @Shiznittlebizbampop1
      @Shiznittlebizbampop1 Před 3 lety +1

      You know.... That actually IS quite impressive! Lol unless he knows the trick of keeping the wrapping on it while you drill the holes. But even then, I've seen people not let the drill do the work and just press with what would have to be like their entire bodyweight and still snap it while the wrapping is still on it.

    • @stonedan0
      @stonedan0 Před 3 lety

      What about this makes him a male Karen? (A Chad is often the reference of a male Karen)

    • @takitaki6454
      @takitaki6454 Před 3 lety

      @@stonedan0 not even close to how chad is used today 😂😄 take your @5 year old definition out of here

    • @Xxassass1n021xX
      @Xxassass1n021xX Před 3 lety

      @@stonedan0 bro wrong a Chad is a satirical deprecation of a manly man. What internet are you on

  • @alcryton6515
    @alcryton6515 Před 3 lety +136

    Why people try to violate the laws of thermodynamics. I still remember my professor of thermodynamics suggested us never try to violate the laws of thermodynamics because they are pure fundamental of any mechanics that you use. Use laws in such a way that you can create something by obeying them but never try to create using violating them. Either you end with failure or understand Concept more well.
    But I am really happy that you tried brother.

    • @what2a8guy
      @what2a8guy Před 3 lety +14

      Kaiwalya Khairnar Perhaps someone will find a loophole in the law. Can never know unless you try, right? I think mankind would be far less advanced if we never tried things we thought we proved to be impossible.

    • @alcryton6515
      @alcryton6515 Před 3 lety +1

      @@what2a8guy hahaha. U r right we should always give a try.
      Look I am not telling don't try of course always try. But if you want to build something productive then u should think and act. and if u have to say humanity will someday violate laws of thermodynamics, then it's not at all possible. I am telling from point of view of research. Actually their are also many reason on the basis of which I typed such a comment also their are some harsh past of mine related to this law.

    • @tynewlin
      @tynewlin Před 3 lety +2

      There is no "law of thermodynamics".

    • @alcryton6515
      @alcryton6515 Před 3 lety +4

      @@tynewlin Bro thermodynamics has many laws but their are 4 basic laws (building pilers) on which whole branch of thermal engineering or thermodynamics works brother. This four laws of thermodynamics are as follows.
      1. 1st law of thermodynamics: Joules law
      2. 2nd law of thermodynamics: Kelvin and Clausius statement.
      3. Zeroth law of temperature equilibrium.
      4. Nernst law of thermodynamics
      This laws are called LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS.
      If you try to violate any one law of above then almost you are trying to violate thermal engineering.

    • @alcryton6515
      @alcryton6515 Před 3 lety +3

      @@what2a8guy The last statement of your comment was quite interesting. Do you know out there, their are many less laws that provides us information and allows us to predict possibilities. Mankind will always aim to do impossible. But the question of possibilities and impossibility arises what are we trying to make possible. U can violate the person or u can put an argument but u can't violate the physical systems .Their are two words Laws and inventions.
      Remember laws are found on the basis of evidence either it's practical or mathematical. And using this evidences you can use engineering to make life better. This means that laws are dominant towards your invention. But if u are violating the system were physics is dominant then it's useless. It's just similar to say that rocket 🚀 going in space which has infinite fuel in it.
      I will share this comments with my colleagues and friends.

  • @Dumb-Comment
    @Dumb-Comment Před 3 lety +10

    Ah yes, the power of forever stable, the most important invention in 2020

  • @jerkfudgewater147
    @jerkfudgewater147 Před 3 lety +13

    Soooo this is how your neighbor contaminated your lawn with Mercury and ruined the resale value
    Totally worth it 👍

  • @ronaldbabat1517
    @ronaldbabat1517 Před 3 lety +8

    My brain: yes its gonna spin
    Video: no
    My brain: AAAAAAAAAAAAA

  • @dashippo
    @dashippo Před 3 lety +7

    If perpetual means won't move unless you move it, I think you nailed it

    • @jimminymccrimminy9598
      @jimminymccrimminy9598 Před 3 lety +6

      Well seeing as it says perpetual stability, yes. Yes he did

    • @NBDYRL
      @NBDYRL Před 3 lety +3

      perpetual means forever in latin and its forever stabile as in it doesnt move without being moved, he nailed it indeed

    • @iwillwatchyourbacknooneels7850
      @iwillwatchyourbacknooneels7850 Před 3 lety

      @@NBDYRL yeah ur kynda right the right term would be: if moving it will find the fastest way to stop nah just joking not the correct term but another one

  • @orangepants5749
    @orangepants5749 Před 3 lety +1

    Built by someone who missed a physics class at school

  • @loyalitiy
    @loyalitiy Před 3 lety +13

    Stable, clearly... It doesn't collapse in itself

  • @boobooboom3961
    @boobooboom3961 Před 3 lety +2

    It works 100% perfectly, the way it's supposed to. It's goes to stable state and stops rotation as soon as the external force causing the rotation is removed. This is because of the liquid is moving in opposite direction and is cancelling it's momentum.

    • @soangry
      @soangry Před 3 lety

      The liquid on the other side is moving the opposite direction, canceling out whatever effect you think it's creating.
      It stops quickly because it has high friction on the bearing and he only pushed it lightly.

  • @andrewyellstrom2585
    @andrewyellstrom2585 Před 3 lety +67

    "I made a machine that when you make it go it never stops! Isn't that amazing? Watch as I make it go."
    /instantly stops/
    "See!?"

  • @Urmomge
    @Urmomge Před 3 lety +7

    I wonder how many thermometers have been sacrificed for this contraption

  • @zacs2118
    @zacs2118 Před 3 lety +2

    Anyone else getting flashbacks from listening to the car radio knowing that the phone will ring in a few seconds. 😂

  • @bvelasco57
    @bvelasco57 Před 3 lety +7

    The speaker when the phone call coming thru 😂 those were the days

    • @fast1nakus
      @fast1nakus Před 3 lety

      Literally started looking around where my phone is, was in my hand -_-'

  • @No_one3638
    @No_one3638 Před 3 lety +54

    Everyone trying to be smart in the comments without reading the title properly

    • @MrPacman64
      @MrPacman64 Před 3 lety +7

      Considering it's in a different language yea I doubt most people will be able to read it

    • @promaxi2251
      @promaxi2251 Před 3 lety +5

      @@MrPacman64 that's not a different language, that's just the name of this wheel

    • @MrPacman64
      @MrPacman64 Před 3 lety +2

      @@promaxi2251 yea not so sure about that mate.

    • @promaxi2251
      @promaxi2251 Před 3 lety +3

      @@MrPacman64 just google it 😂

    • @MrPacman64
      @MrPacman64 Před 3 lety

      @@promaxi2251 i did. hence the comment i just left

  • @omshree901
    @omshree901 Před 3 lety +37

    It's a perpetual STABILE, you experts of thermodynamics.

  • @anchorbait6662
    @anchorbait6662 Před 3 lety +9

    Dude: "what? Omg its not working!"
    Physics: "no shit"

    • @tickaten
      @tickaten Před 3 lety +1

      It's a perpetually stable, stable as in not moving

    • @vaethe
      @vaethe Před 3 lety

      victor the title is a joke, it’s supposed to be a perpetual motion machine but those are bullshit

  • @sarthak8350
    @sarthak8350 Před 3 lety +26

    😂 it is very heavy
    Thats why its not rotating

    • @yasyasmarangoz3577
      @yasyasmarangoz3577 Před 3 lety +1

      🤦‍♀️

    • @ishigamiyu1991
      @ishigamiyu1991 Před 3 lety +1

      Lol perpetual machines don't work

    • @agapiosagapiou
      @agapiosagapiou Před 3 lety

      Too much friction!

    • @ishigamiyu1991
      @ishigamiyu1991 Před 3 lety

      @@agapiosagapiou yep, too much friction too little friction it doesn't really matter cause a little friction will always stop it from spinning and a perpetual device is supposed to spin forever without external force so it's failing either way

    • @sarthak8350
      @sarthak8350 Před 3 lety

      @@ishigamiyu1991 i know

  • @agapiosagapiou
    @agapiosagapiou Před 3 lety +4

    A suggestion: measure the torque that is needed to spin and compare to the torque that created from the arc deference and the mercury mass and the gravity.
    Torque of friction

    • @renagenic
      @renagenic Před 3 lety +2

      There is no torque created. It's a passive object with no way of moving itself....
      otherwise it would be moving....
      You cannot create torque from nothing (energy must be exchanged) . If this guy had the brains to turn it on its side, he might have realised why this was always a pointless endeavour

    • @agapiosagapiou
      @agapiosagapiou Před 3 lety

      @@renagenic hi
      For a perpetual machine is correct but in this case we have a psevdoperpetual machine that with carful plan and build it can work!
      The principal of the specific machine is the mass position relevant to the axis. On the one side is close to the axis (gravity x mass x distance= torque) and on the other side is farther from the shaft. This alone is created a torque deference that it can rotate the system. But to work the opposite torque from bearings friction must be less.
      Look up in the net

    • @renagenic
      @renagenic Před 3 lety +2

      @@agapiosagapiou look it up on the net..... You mean the theories that some people write that say its possible (idiots) , or actual inventions that use this as a source of power. Because the latter doesn't exist not even as a demo version that can just run continuously. and the theories do not work, mathematically because they haven't taken the losses and imbalance into consideration. BTW no there is no torque created, there would be if what you said was correct, but you have failed to calculate where the centre of gravity is in relation to the centre of rotation, and the wheels centre of mass. Do that, and the answer jumps out at you. I know you just said that you've taken those into account, but that IS THE REASON why it doesn't work. If the COG was over the CoR this would be 5%closer to making 0 net energy

    • @agapiosagapiou
      @agapiosagapiou Před 3 lety

      @@renagenic look I'm not disagree with you. Your totally correct with the perpetual machine. But from definition that on the video is not a perpetual motion machine is a psevdoperpetual, it gets energy from gravity.
      Any way I see this machine to work but they can only rotate, not more. Not exit power. And after a while they stop. Just to clarify, that are just cool toys. There not capable to produce work. Only motion.

    • @renagenic
      @renagenic Před 3 lety +2

      @@agapiosagapiou you'd be right, except motion is work. If you have to keep putting energy in, and it slows, no matter how little when the input power is taken away, that's a flywheel. It's just working off momentum. Like you said, it will stop, but as long as its spinning it will constantly loose energy. The drinking bird/tipping bird is a better 'perpetual motion machine' than this. Take care mate. Nice to know there are people on here that think outside the box (this never used to be outside the box thinking) but looking at all the comments, it seems to be now.

  • @crocogile2352
    @crocogile2352 Před 3 lety +10

    Guys, he's just demonstrating a popular non working design.

    • @LightningJack
      @LightningJack Před 3 lety

      The design works perfectly. Read the title again.
      Perpetually stable(perpetuum stabile), forever standing still machines, are made to stop themselves from spinning as long as no force is applied on them.

  • @tylowe6875
    @tylowe6875 Před 3 lety +7

    Its a great idea for vehicles that need more stopping power.

  • @pacogonfishin
    @pacogonfishin Před 3 lety +7

    You can hear the Tesla coil interfering with whatever he's using to record

    • @BoomShard17
      @BoomShard17 Před 3 lety

      I was wondering what that noise was. I have heard it in older electronics. Do you know what causes that sound at 0:14

    • @pacogonfishin
      @pacogonfishin Před 3 lety

      @@BoomShard17 Tesla coil. Wireless energy device interfering with his audio. Any receiving end with a similar hertz will make that noise, much like a microwave will kill your wireless internet because it works off of a similar wavelength :)

    • @BoomShard17
      @BoomShard17 Před 3 lety +1

      @@pacogonfishin thank you, I'll do more research, but I always wondered what makes that noise in certain devices in highschool. Also I wondered why I can never land a hit in an online game while making hot pockets. Lol

    • @pacogonfishin
      @pacogonfishin Před 3 lety

      @@BoomShard17 lol

    • @user2C47
      @user2C47 Před 3 lety +1

      Tesla coils aren't used for digital data. This is interference from an old cell phone system.
      @Jessee Hayes This is because a microwave oven actively jams the frequency used by most WiFi systems. Try using a wired connection or 5GHz WiFi.

  • @jonnda
    @jonnda Před 3 lety +6

    This is a cool bit of kinetic sculpture. Put an electric motor on it so you don't have to keep pushing it.

    • @braamschmidmountainbiking632
      @braamschmidmountainbiking632 Před 3 lety

      That would be against its purpose.

    • @jonnda
      @jonnda Před 3 lety

      @@braamschmidmountainbiking632 I disagree.

    • @braamschmidmountainbiking632
      @braamschmidmountainbiking632 Před 3 lety +1

      @@jonnda the purpose of this device is to stop itself from spinning.so a motor would be pointless.

    • @hecki0193
      @hecki0193 Před 3 lety

      @@jonnda then you haven't got the point of this contraption

    • @jonnda
      @jonnda Před 3 lety

      @@hecki0193 Actually, I do. Because perpetual motion is a fairytale. However, kinetic sculpture is a legitimate art form, and some artists want to make it look like it could be some type of perpetual motion device.
      So put an electric motor on this, because it has obviously failed at a perpetual motion otherwise, and you failed to understand the point of my original comment.

  • @rjaylick-uni_novaz
    @rjaylick-uni_novaz Před 3 lety +30

    R/woooshhhh to 90% of the people in the comments who didn’t get the joke

  • @harshitms7401
    @harshitms7401 Před 3 lety

    People back in day wanted free energy, like we do today, this was an attempt by indian mathematician called Bhaskara in 12th century.
    To people calling him dumb, look at his other successful works, they are impressive for his time.

  • @biismala
    @biismala Před 3 lety +8

    perpetual stupidity, is the only thing I see here, thermodynamics does not lie ...

    • @Elric509
      @Elric509 Před 3 lety

      The title isn't lying, it's perpetually stable, it stops moving when you stop moving it

    • @biismala
      @biismala Před 3 lety

      @@Elric509 jajajajajaja ok... then it is not perpetual because as soon as it moves it stops being stable hahahahaha

    • @Elric509
      @Elric509 Před 3 lety +1

      @@biismala perpetually stabilizing then? Lol idk

  • @arandomcatwithglasses308
    @arandomcatwithglasses308 Před 3 lety +3

    Hmm... CZcams algorithm will recommend this video until it gets 10 million views

  • @Larsen514
    @Larsen514 Před 3 lety +3

    Ooohhhh I get get it 😏
    Perpetuum STABLE. Or rather, "Incessantly STATIC"!!

  • @matthewbertrand4139
    @matthewbertrand4139 Před 3 lety

    PSA: This is not a perpetual motion machine. It is a perpetually stable object, designed such that when it is set in motion, it instantly counters the forces acting on it and returns to stability. In fairness, though, it's not a very good one of those either. They are as hard to make convincingly as a perpetual motion machine.

  • @userman444
    @userman444 Před 3 lety +11

    I heard that he is still pushing it till our days.

    • @kutsy3785
      @kutsy3785 Před 3 lety

      Please define "our days"

    • @userman444
      @userman444 Před 3 lety

      @@kutsy3785 means "till present days", "till now"

    • @sosukeXkun
      @sosukeXkun Před 3 lety

      Well yes, you need to push it to see how it works, if you don't you wont be able to see that it's suposed to stop itself from spinning, just as intended for a perpetually stable machine, stable as in not moving and not as in motion... so you just missed the point

  • @ToszaMotovlogger
    @ToszaMotovlogger Před 3 lety +4

    Hoppá, szóval ez egy magyar videó! :D

  • @user-tw9io9nz2m
    @user-tw9io9nz2m Před 3 lety +1

    Perpetuum stabile, forever standing still 👌

  • @ilan9588
    @ilan9588 Před 3 lety +1

    It's a perpetuum stabile which means that it will stay in the position at all times and not move by itself.
    I repeat, it's not a perpetuum mobile!

  • @Bigtoweliee
    @Bigtoweliee Před 5 lety +4

    Szia! Erdekelne par dolog a videoval kapcsolatban, ha esetleg tudnank beszelni valahogy nagyszeru lenne!

  • @remty516
    @remty516 Před 3 lety +3

    Looks damn good as an art piece.

  • @cherrypepsi2815
    @cherrypepsi2815 Před 3 lety +1

    In this universe we obey the laws of thermodynamics

  • @VellanSubrumaniam
    @VellanSubrumaniam Před 3 lety

    Most perpetual motion videos lie with hidden power supply. Salute this video for being true, and not worried about comments. I still laugh reading comments mocking this video. Thus the video is NOT useless.

  • @bob-hacking6027
    @bob-hacking6027 Před 3 lety +14

    Even if you showed it moving on it’s own, it would eventually stop. Therefore not perpetual

    • @benjaminswartley1803
      @benjaminswartley1803 Před 3 lety +4

      It is perpetually stable. That is exactly what the title says. It does not claim to be a perpetual motion machine.

  • @sergeyaudacesfortunajuvat9205

    Что за хрень с ртутью ? Головой ударился что б такое собрать ?

    • @Ma_X64
      @Ma_X64 Před 3 lety

      Ну а чо, можно запоры лечить.

    • @whos_your_daddy
      @whos_your_daddy Před 3 lety

      Бессмертный наверное, чтоб парами ртути дышать, пока по колбам разливает

    • @Ma_X64
      @Ma_X64 Před 3 lety

      @@whos_your_daddy не настолько это страшно. Бывали случаи, когда в жилых домах под полом целые лужи ртути годами стояли, и никто не жаловался. Оно, конечно, ничего хорошего, но не страшнее, чем воздух у нас в Челябинске.)))

    • @Smd2d
      @Smd2d Před 3 lety

      Очередной "вечный двигатель" на ртути 😁

    • @petya2312
      @petya2312 Před 3 lety

      Хуйня какая-то

  • @abigalerose1410
    @abigalerose1410 Před 3 lety +1

    It's perpetually stable no mater where they rotate it to the mercury balances the weight making it stable thus forever stable.

  • @Simonelectricfl
    @Simonelectricfl Před 3 lety

    What is causing the RF interface when you get close to the machine?

  • @padddy48
    @padddy48 Před 3 lety +12

    it says Stable not moving 😂

  • @jorgea.g.g.8506
    @jorgea.g.g.8506 Před 3 lety +4

    Perpetual machine. Just a dream

    • @pratiksaini144
      @pratiksaini144 Před 3 lety +3

      Watch Praveen mohan video on it

    • @sovietcomrade7733
      @sovietcomrade7733 Před 3 lety +1

      @Deny Septiawan that's litterally not possible in our universe

    • @Matt_10203
      @Matt_10203 Před 3 lety +2

      @Deny Septiawan its not possible. It violates the laws of thermodynamics as the system would have to create energy to overcome its own frictional forces which therefore makes. Energy cannot be created or destroyed.

    • @tr1p1ea
      @tr1p1ea Před 3 lety +1

      Perpetually stable machine (title). It's meant to resist moving ... So it appears to work as intended.

  • @badbatch974
    @badbatch974 Před 3 lety +1

    Or you could have made a square and placed it on the floor. Either way it won’t spin on it’s own.

    • @ecchikami9757
      @ecchikami9757 Před 3 lety

      It's not supposed to

    • @badbatch974
      @badbatch974 Před 3 lety

      @@ecchikami9757 ya? smart guy, that’s why I said a square. It says in the title that it’s supposed to not spin.

  • @whosle
    @whosle Před 3 lety +1

    Why didn't it start on its own? Mine started on its own after completion and has been providing me with free energy of about 20,000watts for 10 years now.

  • @sky_martin1059
    @sky_martin1059 Před 3 lety +9

    You perpetually wasted my time..!!

    • @ba-tobartc.6230
      @ba-tobartc.6230 Před 3 lety

      #metoo!

    • @oriongabriel6966
      @oriongabriel6966 Před 3 lety

      How? It said what it was going to do in the title? Thats your fault isnt it?

    • @monkeytrumpet11
      @monkeytrumpet11 Před 3 lety

      If you came here looking for a perpetual motion machine, you don't need any help whatsoever wasting your own time. This machine did exactly what the title said. Perpetually stable. Stops as soon as any outside force or energy is no longer applied.

  • @KD-jk6yo
    @KD-jk6yo Před 3 lety +4

    If that's mercury then you're playing a dangerous game my friend.

  • @LuckyDragon1964
    @LuckyDragon1964 Před 2 měsíci

    I thought of this same concept back in the 1980's. I called it an internal waterwheel. I never got around to building on, only ideas on paper.
    Having one side of the wheel heavier with the weight outside and the opposite side would be lighter with the weight on the inside closer to the hub.
    I see now from your model that the liquid sloshes just enough to cause resistance.
    Back to the drawing board 😢

  • @r3gret2079
    @r3gret2079 Před 3 lety +2

    Lol thats a great machine right there. Helluva way to, make a rock. This does look way cooler tho. Good job.

  • @igormorningstar
    @igormorningstar Před 3 lety +7

    True perpetual motion can only exist in an over idealized universe

    • @Ma_X64
      @Ma_X64 Před 3 lety

      Actually all of universe is full of motion that is perpetual for human being.

    • @renagenic
      @renagenic Před 3 lety

      @@Ma_X64 Perpetual for humans......... Yeah that's not what perpetual means, if you have to add a qualifier, you've already lost.

    • @Ma_X64
      @Ma_X64 Před 3 lety

      ​@@renagenic Not at all. Humans built hydroelectrostations. I don't think this is some kind of lose.

    • @renagenic
      @renagenic Před 3 lety

      @@Ma_X64 We built damns to create gravitational potential energy storage and when we let the water fall, it changes from gravitation to kinetic and kinetic to electric. What the hell has that got to do with perpetuality not being relational to humans

    • @Ma_X64
      @Ma_X64 Před 3 lety

      @@renagenic You are funny. Who you think raises all that water to the sky? The Sun. Isn't it? Energy for forming stars is from the universe. Energy can't be destroyed but only transformed from one form to another.

  • @stevenpoels4639
    @stevenpoels4639 Před 3 lety +8

    somutch money and trouble and it dont work ,wow i am disapointed toghether with you , thank for all the effort to recreate baschkara wheel ,i dont understand it not work ....pfffff

    • @sovietcomrade7733
      @sovietcomrade7733 Před 3 lety +1

      Because free energy and infinite mouvement isn't possible

    • @agapiosagapiou
      @agapiosagapiou Před 3 lety

      A suggestion for all that want to build something like this, do the math first thare not hard!

    • @clintflippo917
      @clintflippo917 Před 3 lety +1

      Agapios, the person who built that is smarter than you. He never expected it work. He built it because it's a cool piece that serves as a reminder to a period to when people were searching for perpetual motion back before people knew it was impossible. It's an art piece, not a science project.

    • @hecki0193
      @hecki0193 Před 3 lety

      Read the title again, its a perpetual STABLE machine not motion machine. Its designed not to spin

  • @autodidacticartisan
    @autodidacticartisan Před 3 lety +1

    Isnt every wheel a perpetual stabile machine? If it wasnt then it would be a perpetual motion machine.
    Ps- to all the other commenters, yeah we get it, you know the second law of thermodynamics.

    • @whiteboyskatez3827
      @whiteboyskatez3827 Před 3 lety

      Well yes and no. A regular wheel stops because of friction only. This wheel stops because of the constant moving of the very heavy mercury that constantly changes the center of mass of the wheel, quickly diminishing the otherwise constant energy and momentum of the wheel. If you placed a wheel on the moon and attached it to its axel via magnets so it doesn't loose energy through friction by rubbing with its axel, it would spin indefinitely. This wheel however would still stop spinning very quickly because there are other forces keeping it from maintaining it's energy.

  • @amanoma0421
    @amanoma0421 Před 3 lety +1

    The weight of the cylinders (contents) is not enough to support the turning weight ratio of the wheel.

  • @frostyspree255
    @frostyspree255 Před 3 lety +14

    Honestly really cool ALSO ALMOST EVERYONE HERE IS STUPID IT SAY STABILE.

    • @patar3323
      @patar3323 Před 3 lety

      That's not a thing right?

    • @LightningJack
      @LightningJack Před 3 lety

      @@patar3323 Perpetually stable machines are designed to stop themselves and be perpetually still until moves them.

    • @patar3323
      @patar3323 Před 3 lety

      @@LightningJack that would be my guess too if that phrase was a real thing and not a joke by the poster. I think we just call it a joint with high friction.

  • @0s0xkiing32
    @0s0xkiing32 Před 3 lety +9

    All these people saying is for perpetual stability please Google it before talking..... Smh it takes 3 seconds

  • @thijsmijnders3452
    @thijsmijnders3452 Před měsícem +1

    You tried to make a prepular motion machine right

  • @drvinson8947
    @drvinson8947 Před 3 měsíci +1

    Kinda hard to hide the batteries when you use clear material. 😅

  • @tulawieM
    @tulawieM Před 3 lety +2

    Lol not even close

    • @hecki0193
      @hecki0193 Před 3 lety

      The machine did what it was supposed to, read the title again

  • @nusaindah81
    @nusaindah81 Před 3 lety +2

    Something's not right 🤔

  • @sergei61391
    @sergei61391 Před 3 lety +1

    🙆‍♂️ И постоянно он уравновешивается, 🤷‍♂️ что с этим делать?

    • @fervens_ursus8984
      @fervens_ursus8984 Před 3 lety

      А ещё и трётся, трётся, трётся... 🤣

  • @PaulMurrayCanberra
    @PaulMurrayCanberra Před 3 lety

    The study of perpetual motion machines is a fine way to learn physics.

  • @volo870
    @volo870 Před 3 lety

    If you heat one half of the contraption, shall it work as a heat engine?

  • @dyonlenoalves147
    @dyonlenoalves147 Před 3 lety

    Aparentemente vc fez com mercúrio colocou dentro das ampolas , se não estou enganado , o que você faz pra regular q pressão interna na mudança de temperatura , ela pode estourar

  • @andy42x
    @andy42x Před 3 lety +1

    I want any ad revenue returned to me, for watching this.

  • @darkslayer6911
    @darkslayer6911 Před 3 lety

    what can this be used for ?

  • @CosmoWenman
    @CosmoWenman Před 3 lety +1

    I'm totally floored that this didn't work. By the way, when ppl try to make a perpetual motion machine, what's their thinking about why it needs a push to get it started?

  • @lbar2458
    @lbar2458 Před 2 měsíci

    Ahh yes trying to break the laws of thermodynamics. I wish you all the luck in the worlds

  • @ponchov.9116
    @ponchov.9116 Před 3 lety +1

    Well, I'm happy he at least didn't fake an actual perpetual movement machine by using a hidden motor or something like that.

    • @kutsy3785
      @kutsy3785 Před 3 lety +1

      I know right, hats off to the guy for not being tempted to fake the movement after all of the effort they put in building it. I feel like thats where most of the fake videos come from, probably people just dont want to see their work go to waste.

    • @ponchov.9116
      @ponchov.9116 Před 3 lety

      @@kutsy3785 I honestly had never thought about it. But it actually makes sense... All those videos with hard-to-build-looking machines are probably just a result of the people not wanting their work wasted, or not having achieved anything after hours of work lol.

    • @lok4890
      @lok4890 Před 3 lety

      @@kutsy3785 same thing everyone has said. It iw supossed to stop itself

  • @kapicziss
    @kapicziss Před 3 lety

    Ppl who say it will work in space or in general any perpetuum will work, that's a big lmao for them ❤️

    • @hecki0193
      @hecki0193 Před 3 lety

      Well this one obviously works exactly as intended, it stops itself every time just like the title says

  • @tentative_flora2690
    @tentative_flora2690 Před 3 lety

    I like how there's so much dedication to a gravity wheel design that you use mercury as a fluid. Gravity wheels are a flawed design born out of a lack of understanding of Newtonian physics. If it doesn't work with marbles or water, why should it work with mercury? Because it's heavier? Seems like a "if only it was a little more X" mindset. Clearly indicating an idea of "I can make it work if it was bigger." Instead of "why does this not work"

    • @tr1p1ea
      @tr1p1ea Před 3 lety

      I think that's meant to be the idea, it's not a perpetual motion device, it's designed to stop motion and remain stable? (Hence the name).

  • @danielspirea7698
    @danielspirea7698 Před měsícem

    Este facuta pentru a dezamagi pe cei care vor sa faca asa ceva
    Este proiectata f prost pentru a nu functiona
    Bratul fortei, adica recipientul cu lichid trebuie sa fie tangent la roata motrice. In acest caz acele brate forta sun dispuse total dezordonat
    In acest caz avem multe brate de forta - recipiente- cu lichid de mercur, care ar trebui sa fie foarte eficient
    Dar oricum, in toate aceste astfel de sisteme trebuie introdus un mecanism care sa controleze viteza de rotatie. Aceasta trebuie sa fie suficient de mica pentru a nu functiona / actiona forta centrifuga asupra lichidului din bratele forta de actionare
    Succes

  • @mochi_munch
    @mochi_munch Před 5 měsíci

    Is that gallium inside the test tubes?

  • @nawie8883
    @nawie8883 Před 3 lety

    What are this machine use for?

  • @RubenFletcher
    @RubenFletcher Před 3 lety

    What should I do with that extra gallon of Mercury today?

  • @joediaz001
    @joediaz001 Před rokem

    Instead of mercury, this would have worked with water just as well, or with just air. Free energy!

  • @StrikerAssassin24
    @StrikerAssassin24 Před 3 lety +1

    Mans heart rate monitor went off when he got to close ;)

  • @foksapet
    @foksapet Před 3 lety

    hey! where did you get all this mercury i cant get any for my carburetor tuner..

  • @minecraftundelektronik
    @minecraftundelektronik Před 3 lety +1

    Is it mercury?

  • @L34nd35
    @L34nd35 Před 3 lety +1

    Is that gallium?

    • @frankzaffuto3670
      @frankzaffuto3670 Před 3 lety

      Mercury, one would assume. Gallium has a low melting point, yes, but not low enough to be liquid on any given day

  • @crackedemerald4930
    @crackedemerald4930 Před 3 lety

    What was the beeping at the beggining?

  • @darkstrike-vz9bg
    @darkstrike-vz9bg Před 3 lety +1

    I like how this looks like one of those infinte rotation machines

  • @masterchief9912
    @masterchief9912 Před 3 lety +1

    I thought this was one of those things were you connect a bunch of fire works to something that spins

  • @luisfernandoberghahnchagas745

    Aham sei!😂😂😂
    “Moto-perpétuo”

  • @dtruque
    @dtruque Před 3 lety

    It's stable because it's heavy AF! The friction on the axle won't let it spin. Perhaps with water it would be more likely to spin, but the mercury gimmick wheel is overkill. You can achieve the same w a train wheel: put it on an axle and it won't spin much if you push it because of inertia, boom, instant perpetually stable train wheel mobile!

  • @skitzoid8202
    @skitzoid8202 Před 3 lety

    The secret to perpetual motion is to spin a wheel in intergalactic space and pretend vacuum friction doesn't exist