Rothschilds vs. Vanderbilts
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 01. 2018
- Why is it that some families lose their wealth and some families manage to build and preserve it over many generations? The Rothschild and Vanderbilt families had very different outcomes. Discover what factors are the best predictors of long term family wealth retention.
www.northwoodfamilyoffice.com...
www.northwoodfamilyoffice.com
www.rafflestrust.com
HELL VS hell
whenever CZcams put up that blue box, you need to pay “additional” attention to the topic highlighted; and not as what CZcams tries to tell you.
He was nervous explaining it by by the their the the
Hell vs hell that's hilarious
Correct!
Wrtburgowie Rotchildowie Rockefellerowie Trumpowie Maxellowie etc...
Gratuluję bankructwa międzynarodowego
I wszyscy są bez grosza
A Tyle wysiłku
Nie warto było brać i naśladować moja dwugenowość.
See I always thought ( facetiously ):
THE RICH GET RICHER AND THE GET POORER 😂
Wake up call to reality for some folks.
Inbreeding
Why people judge people on their built up family success?
And yes they have done errors and faults, and they have paid for them. Other citizens maybe do not put in account by judging.
You have never met and never have spoken to these families, so based on what do people judge wealth of families? If you don't like to have a life in a regulated country then ask yourself if you are living in the right system. It's so easy and simple to comment "hell"...have you people ever been in the nowadays hell? If not, stay for several years in survival camp and learn to eveluate things like eating bread today or maybe tomorrow...this is the point how to become wealth and sure there are other things to do like low paid Jobs too.
People judge wealth of some families cause some families are corrupt or worse than others.
Also saying a regulated country is great because if you leave the country you may only eat bread every other day is absurd. There’s millions of homeless people in the U.S. still today while we’re printing money to fund more endless war or printing money to house new immigrants housed by Us government contractors.
Just because someone doesn’t like money printing and theft does not mean they’re against a general rule of law. That’s insane to think someone can be against a country with some regulations simply because they don’t like an overbearing government.
Also I think it’s 100% appropriate to judge families that made their fortune by financing endless wars by monarchs or governments. Many banks went from literally lending own their own money like legitimately lending out hard money and then banks morphed into lending out paper fist currency where they can create money out of thin air and keep 10% of deposits as reserves. Of course during the rona banks literally could have 0% in reserves as governments tried to get banks to lend even more.
Then ya got the federalreserve that is privatelyowned that pays a 6%dividend to shareholders.
I think it’s 100% appropriate to be mad that politicians sold out the ability to print money to the federalreserve. Lincoln did modern monetary theory printing like 400 million or something without issuing any debt. This mad bankers mad obviously. There were even newspaper reports in England worried about Lincoln printing money without issuing debt. Yes it was inflationary but it also showed you didn’t need a privatelyownedcentralbank.