This is the way Christ should be taught and presented...May be the historical Jesus is different....Jesus is the Word that was with God in the beginning and the promised Gospel of God the Lord.
I believe the good father is wrong about the longer ending of St. Mark. It is easily defensible. There are good reasons why it does not appear in certain strands of manuscripts, and yet was original and authentic. Check this out: czcams.com/video/IKj8EvcJC8g/video.html
There are many things that I have found interesting BUT at the same time there are many things I have espoused as erroneous. For example: He stated that The Law was for the Jews, in the OT you clearly see how gentiles were Included then through the mix multitude that came out of Egypt with Israel, you see so how Joshua in the conquest made a covenant with The Gibeonites. So explain how The Law was strictly Jewish.. when during the wilderness wandering Egyptians and I'm sure other Semitic people were included?
Memory eternal!
Excellent.
Excellent
Blessings
This is the way Christ should be taught and presented...May be the historical Jesus is different....Jesus is the Word that was with God in the beginning and the promised Gospel of God the Lord.
The sound won't play. Please take a look and fix if possible! Thank you.
Sorry the sound is not working. No diction.
Please reload part 2 and 3 , you can hear nothing from both.
There is a problem with the sound, clip doesn't work at all....could you post it again?😢
The audio is butchered. Just me?
I believe the good father is wrong about the longer ending of St. Mark. It is easily defensible. There are good reasons why it does not appear in certain strands of manuscripts, and yet was original and authentic. Check this out: czcams.com/video/IKj8EvcJC8g/video.html
I see. Thanks for sharing
Where is Part II
Look for it under Seraphim William Davidson
Some of the highest ranking have so little faith.
There are many things that I have found interesting BUT at the same time there are many things I have espoused as erroneous. For example: He stated that The Law was for the Jews, in the OT you clearly see how gentiles were Included then through the mix multitude that came out of Egypt with Israel, you see so how Joshua in the conquest made a covenant with The Gibeonites. So explain how The Law was strictly Jewish.. when during the wilderness wandering Egyptians and I'm sure other Semitic people were included?
Cannot hear this at all except for clicks