Intelligent Design Collection Trailer
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 04. 2013
- This documentary trilogy presents the scientific case for intelligent design. UNLOCKING THE MYSTERY OF LIFE reveals compelling evidence for design at the level of molecules and cells. The PRIVILEGED PLANET explores the depths of the cosmos in a memorable search for purpose in the universe. DARWIN'S DILEMMA considers the geologically-sudden appearance of dozens of major complex animal types in the fossil record without any trace of the gradual transitional steps Charles Darwin had predicted.
The DVD is available for purchase now - visit www.illustramedia.com for more information.Use Coupon Code YTIM15 to save 15%! - Věda a technologie
thanks, from India
Evolution is a *FACT* Even if it was unguided, that doesn't disprove God. I think God is the designer and mind behind it all.
Creas o no llegara el día en que te doblaras tus rodillas ante el Creador, espero que no sea demasiado tarde para cuando lo hagas !! Apostamos !!?
...that man "descended" from the animals...
thanks from Brasil Paul N.
Please translate this and this kind of videos to Turkish...Because ateists serve science for darwinism much in here..
Thanks.
Phillip Johnson is a science author? He's authored science? I thought he was a lawyer.
Dios no hizo a Adán y Eva, sino que hizo células inteligentes para luego hacer a Adán y a Eva? O es el reconocimiento de una inteligencia universai, tal vez no consciente de si misma, que no es el tradicional Dios.
من المنطق ان هنالك سبع سموات فيجب أن هنالك سبع اراضي اي سبع كواكب صالحه الحيات للكانات الاخرا التم تركيلها من كوكب الأرض في محرات اخرا حسب شهادة السيره والسلوك على كوكب الأرض يولد هناك في مخلوقات تختلف عننا شكلا ومضمونا في اكوان قد خلقها الله تبعد عننا ماءة السنوات الضويه عليها بشر او كانت اخرا تختلف عننا شكلا ومضمونا؛؛ اول مجازنا ان الأرواح التي ينتهي أجلها ترحل اوتنتقل على شكل موجات صوتيه كهرومغناطيسه عبر موجات الكون الئ عالم ماوراء الطبيعه التسكين في تلك الأرضي حسب صلاحها على كوكب الأرض فهي تستحق تلك المرتبه على الكوكب الاخر مجازا
Intelligent is not a word I would use if a god did create all of this. Humans create things at a higher intelligent level than any god can prove. Arguing against I.D. is one of the easiest things for me to do.
And indeed, among the People of the Scripture are those who believe in Allah and what was revealed to you and what was revealed to them, [being] humbly submissive to Allah . They do not exchange the verses of Allah for a small price. Those will have their reward with their Lord. Indeed, Allah is swift in account. Ali Imran 3:199
Indeed Allahu'Akbar....!!!
Spanish
Wwll okayy evolution is obvious in some. Necessities what necessites, for who or what?
According to a New York Times article by Svante Pääbo, the evolutionary geneticist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany who first mapped the Neanderthal genome - the DNA blueprint. He says that the differences between two individual humans living today can actually be greater than the differences between most humans and most Neanderthals, genetically speaking.
why are we intelligently designed to be primates?
great videos, I love these guys, they're amongst the top creationists out there!
Proud subscribe support Illustra. Please check out some more of their presentations and give them your thumbs! Today, science is pointing more directly and more powerfully to the existence of a creator than any other time in the history of the world.
Yes they are awesome
Jesus Christ is the way, the truth and the life and no one comes to the Father except through him! God is amazing and all of creation shows us his handiwork. God is an AWESOME God!! God bless
Phillip Johnson: ""I approach the creation-evolution dispute not as a scientist but as a professor of law, which means among other things that I know something about the ways that words are used in arguments." . Well, that rests science's case in this respect and with regards to P. Johnson: evolution is, intelligent design isn't.
*****
Well, I can answer this one: "Natural selection is or is not like artificial selection which leads the existing generation to evolution?"
Natural selection is most definitely *not* like artificial selection. Artificial selection requires an intelligence pushing buttons, besides natural selection. So there is an extra factor. We, humans, engage in artificial selection (dogs).
And Natural Selection doesn't _lead to_ Evolution. *It's always evolving*. Natural selection is *part of* Evolution.
*****
Just saying: creationism is not science...
*****
So, you accept Evolution.
It's a good thing creationists will eventually prove the one thing they are wasting so much time on opposing; Evolution.
By going extinct...
And revising the name to "intelligent design" doesn't make it any less creationism.
Which is based on a 1600 YO story book.
Wilbert Lek www.discovery.org/a/1329
Trolls are not fed...
At least my brain is
Joel Almloff
Yes... your brain was fed to the zombies secretly created by satanic ungodly god-denying satan-loving conspiring satanic scientists who are satanic and ungodly and conspiring and god-denying and satan-loving. Did I mention they are satanic and ungodly and conspiring and god-denying and satan-loving? Because they are, you know. Constantly... with the god-denying and the satan-loving... and the feeding of brains to zombies they create... Bunch of god-denying satan-loving ungodly satanic conspiring scientists...
By the way... how is the science of increattelligent detionsign holding up? Or don't you have any scientists?...
(Remember: scientists are *all* ungodly and satanic satan-loving and god-denying conspirators against "god"... All of them. So... )
*****
And in the process also prove they are, in fact, idiots...
Oh wait... they do that constantly...
By the way, what is a "evolutionist"?
What does intelligent design prove?
It proves that there is some godly being that created us, not necessarily God (depends on who you talk to).
Do you think it proves that there is some godly being?
+Jesus Christ Nothing. "Intelligent" and "design" remain effectively undefined. A theory cannot have explanatory power if it is uncertain what the theory says in the first place.
I've been trying to figure out what we could use ID for and I've thought about it for years, but I am stumped. I've even asked other people on the internet and in the forums and no one can give me a use for ID. It comes down to this, what can we use ID for?
Will ID bring us the next new miracle drug?
Will ID bring us new discoveries in science?
Will ID bring us new technology?
Will ID bring us a better understanding of our universe?
The answer is no to all. If anyone has an answer I sure would like to hear it.
+Jesus Christ So if it's the truth but doesn't lead to new developments, it is of no value in your eyes? Do you honestly think the faith in man evolving from from single celled organisms through purely materialistic means is how new miracle drugs and other developments were invented?
''the geologically-sudden appearance of dozens of major complex animal types in the fossil record without any trace of the gradual transitional steps Charles Darwin had predicted.''
Darwin was wrong about gradualism. His ideas are 150 years out of date, try and keep up. See Punctuated Equilibrium.
I read they both occur in nature. Which is perfectly fine by me. They're both a form of gradual change. One just follows a different mode of operation, so to speak, but it still takes hundred of thousands of years.
As long as there's no magical creature snapping it's index extensions to "create" all kinds of organisms out of nothing. Or "speak them into existence"...
...out of nothing.
i like these videos. but they still support the globe idea when infact the earth is not a globe
"Today, science is pointing more directly and more powerfully to the existence of a creator than any other time in the history of the world." Lee Strobel
BLAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Oh, Lee, you fucking kill me!!!
The intelligent design collection?!!! I'm dying here.
It is pretty funny to think your uncle was a chimp😂
It is no different then having an elite programmer, create a virtual world. The AI can't see the designer past the screen. Number and value consistently change without the programmer manually changing those value/numbers and figures. GTA 5, Sims, Batllefield etc are prime examples.
HERE IS THE EXTENT OF PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS FOR INTELLIGENT DESIGN
Below is an extract of Behe's (ID’s Expert Witness) cross-examination from the Dover Trial
Q. now you have never argued for Intelligent Design in a peer reviewed scientific journal, correct?
Behe - no, I argued for it in my book.
Q. not in a peer reviewed scientific?
Behe - that's correct.
Q. and, in fact, there are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for Intelligent Design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how Intelligent Design of any biological system occurred, is that correct?
Behe - that is correct, yes
The Criador WINS !
"Criador"?
qual o problema criatura ?
，
The people they grabbed randomly off the street sounded way more in tune than these "educated people" that followed them. The video went way downhill after the first 45 seconds.
Hmmm intelligent design? What about cancer, wisdom teeth, male nipples, tailbones? Is that all intelligent design?
In my opinion illnesses could possibly be explained by a slow degradation of the DNA (over many generations). Does this make sense?
No it doesn't because the exact opposite should happen because of natural selection. Also we still have some traits from our ape ancestors that we haven't gotten "rid" of yet, hence the tail bone. Our ancestors had tails, and those characteristics are still with us to this day.
+Pyroxidy - The coccyx is not a tail, nor is it a useless leftover from when humans were another form. It is a vital part of the human frame as modern science is finding out.
As for cancer, that must be linked to man-made poisons in the atmosphere, in foods and other stuffs. For example, thousands of very large nuclear weapons have been exploded in the upper atmosphere, in the sea and underground over the years - the poisons of which naturally find their way into our breathable air, our land and our water. The list of pollutants is endless and these pollutants were all 'intelligently' designed by man. I wouldn't blame God for mankind's errors.
TenHanded Explain why human embryos grow tails, that dissolve later on in development. Also people have been dying from cancer for centuries, before "pollutants poisoned" the air. For fucks sake, the sun causes cancer. Would an intelligent, all knowing, omniscient being, do something like that? And the list that "disproves" intelligent design goes on forever, I can name 100s of flaws within intelligent design.
Pyroxidy - Mankind has been doing things that causes damage to his natural state for just as many centuries.
I don't think the Sun is to blame. Scientists can show that sunscreens are the problem, along with the popular hobby of lying down under the sun for hours at a time in order to change ones natural skin colour. There are possibly pollutants in the cream, plus people stay out in the sun too long causing damage to their skin because the cream makes it feel like no harm is being done. Hats, clothes and shade can all prevent the burning and damaging of skin.
Though I wouldn't be surprised if those upper atmosphere nuclear tests I mentioned caused some damage to the atmosphere's protective layers that guard the earth from the sun.
You can talk for 10 hours how you 'feel' something is design, doesn't make it so. You can't deny the evidence, so if you really want to put a designer on single celled life, what makes you think that designer had us in mind, then suddenly cares what we eat, drink, who we sleep with and when, how we live, how we spend our time on a sunday, etc. I just can't fathom we're still having these discussions in the 21th century. I feel sad that I live in a time of such childish ignorance.
It's impossible to argue with a dullard, someone who refuses to acknowledge G-d. They refuse to read and study Torah, refuse to see that the Messiah of Israel completed all requirements to be the only possible Savior of mankind. The people in these videos represent a small number of scientists and physicists who have learned that all of their studies lead to intelligent design. Most of us are not that talented or educated, and we have to rely on HaShem to guide us to him, which He will do if we ask. Avraham believed G-d and it was counted to him as righteousness.
No religious confusions in science please!
"Intelligent Design" amounts to nothing more than an _argument from ignorance._
"We don't (yet) know something, therefore for unspecified reasons it must be God".
"We don't understand complexity, therefore for unspecified reasons it must be God".
"We don't understand the bacterial flagellum, therefore for unspecified reasons it must be God". Understand, a lack of knowledge, is not knowledge.
If you compute the fractal dimensions for things we know to be designed, because we are the designers, then these have a low fractal dimension. On the other hand, things that we have not designed have higher fractal dimensionality. The hallmark of design is actually *_simplicity,_* not complexity. I think most of us have heard of the "KISS" principle (Keep it Simple, Stupid), we don't design for things to be as complex as possible, we design for things to be as simple as possible. Overly complex design is poor design, it unnecessarily produces more opportunity for failure.
More complex things disperse energy much more efficiently than simpler things, and so actually work better to facilitate entropy, indicating that entropy is actually the impetus driving local complexity.
"I don't know what ID actually argues, therefore it must be an argument from ignorance."
Atheist need to see this
BWAHAHAHAHAHA No God just us..
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮