House votes to expand inquiry on interference mandate | THE FRONT BENCH
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 06. 2024
- Tom Mulcair, Brian Gallant, Rob Benzie and Lisa Raitt speak on the house voting to expand the inquiry on interference.
Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos: / ctvnews
Connect with CTV News:
For live updates and latest headlines visit: www.ctvnews.ca/
For breaking news, fast, download the CTV News App: www.ctvnews.ca/app
Must-watch stories and full programs at www.ctvnews.ca/video
CTV News on TikTok: www.tiktok.com/discover/CTV-News
CTV News on X (formerly Twitter): / ctvnews
CTV News on Reddit: / ctvnews
CTV News on LinkedIn: / ctv-news
---
CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.
Speaking of racism, remember when Trudeau was accusing reporters of being racist for asking questions about interference, let's not forget that
Something is rotten in the basic Trutatorship.
I really don’t think that Elizabeth May is our most reliable source here
She’s got the security clearance.
@@McLovin1759anybody in the house can get it
@@McLovin1759 so what, doesn’t mean her opinion is the correct one
@@Baileygirl2023 Um, it means her she is the informed one.
Pierre chooses to be ignorant.
Funny thing is he says he wants to stay ignorant of what is really happening in order that he can talk about the thing he knows nothing about.
@@McLovin1759 lol maybe you should listen to Tom Mulclair. He is a much more respected and knowledgeable person. He totally agrees with Pollievres decision, and questions May speaking about what she read. Basically crossing the lines or getting close.
Only in Canada would this be tolerated. Trudeau would have been removed over a year ago anywhere else.
release the names
The mob is just….. curious to know 🔥
Ahhhh, yes, the town drunk. Very reputable woman!
I was told with a young age. Never trust anyone with teeth and constantly slurred speech.
Navdeep Bains. Why did he suddenly quit politics in Jan 2021? One day, he was an up and coming Cabinet Minister. The right after Christmas, he announced he was resigning to spend more time with his family.
I will look Navdeep Bains…more Canadians Hope Fully will do research.😊 thx.
This viewing is a trap for Poilievre and it will the his hands. He is right to refuse
100%
So if Jagmeet reads the information, will he give Canadians the names of the MP’s?
No, that's the point the way the Liberals have set it up is, if you read it you can't talk about it. In essence a gag order. The question is why would the Liberal party do that. Something to hide perhaps?
Talkin* about oath, then the NDP, LIBERAL leader(PM), should share a jail cell!!!!
Pierre not getting or couldn't get security clearance are false. Pierre is a prevy council member because he was a minister and already has a high degree of security clearance. He chose not to partake for a number of reasons and I fully agree and understand his reasonings.
They have all agreed to get clearance and will say that they will fire any mp in their party must go, if on the list. None will let anyone go and try to imply they are conservatives. It is a game the coalition will be playing. Elizabeth May said no MP is on the list then goes on to say there is.
I hope you follow up with Jagmeet Singh's opinion of the report.
How about your lobbiest brother? Prosecute?
If she really saw then now can she talk about it. I do not believe her ever.
Liz needs to get glasses😮
May isn't very bright especially after a few drinks.😮
Mulcair is irresponsible
Ok. Suspend every MP named in the report until the investigation is complete. Let the parties fall where they may. RCMP.....TIME TO STAND UP FOR CANADA!
Has anyone been able to find Mary Simon in all of this? She'd be wise to dissolve government. Wake up King Charles....Canada has question......
PP’s stance is laughable and his/their voters should demand better.
He says he won’t get the clearance to learn what’s going on because he wants to talk about it. What’s he going to talk about if he knows nothing factual about it?
Lib troll…
@@Jay-nq2jl That’s not quite a counter argument.
Debate the point. Pierre knows nothing about what’s actually going on.
So why would you be interested in what he has to say on the subject?
Might as well put you on stage to get your take on it.