Dynam Focke Wulf FW-190 RC Plane Maiden Flight - One of the Best Flying Warbirds!
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 01. 2020
- If you've been following RC Video Reviews for any length of time, you know I'm rarely at a loss for words. This time: I just don't know what to tell you...
This video is sponsored by Bitgo Hobby who provided this review unit. You can find the Dynam Focke Wulf FW-190 on Bitgo's website here:
www.bitgohobby.com/Dynam-Fock... - Věda a technologie
Great job ,what a nice flying plane handled the wind well,for the money you can't beat Dynam planes
I agree. They have an excellent value proposition. The new Skylord ESCs took care of the biggest issue with their planes. Simply put: The FW190 is just excellent.
Nice plane. Great review and video!
Thanks John. Chris is really becoming good with that camera. He learns fast.
The jerries didn`t paint their propeller tips yellow, mostly just USAF & RAF.
Good tip. Thanks for sharing.
But with your theory of leaving the gear down, wouldn't that create some drag that you wouldn't have with them up, which may change the overall flight characteristics? Seems odd.
I'm not worried about drag on a maiden. For me, maidens are simply to prove the aircraft and make sure the plane flies. All airplanes should be able to fly fine with gear down although yes, they will be a little more draggy.
Dynam rc planes are great,, but I always change the retracts for some that work every time.
Do you have a particular brand? e-Flite?
Oh yeah!!!
:)
What about the retractable landing gear do they work ??
See previous comment.
Nice review why did you leave the main gear down?
I always leave gear down on maiden flights. There's always enough that can go wrong on a maiden without adding the question of whether or not the gear will work if landing because immediately necessary.
So for maidens, I leave gear down, flaps up, a few circuits to trim and verify straight and level flight capabilities. A couple of approaches if necessary and land.
Then a fairly thorough inspection to verify things like control rod connections, servo mounts, control surfaces, motor mount, wing joints, tail feather security, hinge points, landing gear.
THEN as long as I feel good with the basic flight performance (balance and straight+level) I fly it using all the capabilities.
Nice plane. Btw, is the video mirrored? I see red nav light on the right wing, and the green light on the left wing?
Wow, great catch. You're right, they're backwards. Thanks, now I have work to do :)
@@RCVideoReviews I have my moments, sometimes. First I was like "nice, it has some good details, even navigation lights" and then my mind went like "but wait a minute, shouldn't the green one be on right side?"
Hope I didn't cause you too much trouble by spotting this. ;-)
@@rc-fannl7364 I looked at it today. It would probably cause too much damage to the wing tips to try and fix, so I'm just going to live with it that way. I'll see how many other people catch it.
I checked the Waco and its lights are correct. Good eye in any case :)
@@RCVideoReviews So it's not a mirrored video, but they actually made an error with installing the nav lights?
have you tried this on 3s power?
Yes. I didn't care for it.
They're calling the newest one V3, wish you would have shown about the landing gear (retracts)
If I didn't say something about them it's because there was nothing to say. They worked.
Hi did you have to add any nose weight ?
No.
I thought that one came with retractable land gear.
It does. I leave retracts and flaps alone on maidens. That way if I have to get down in a hurry, I have one less thing to worry about. This strategy has paid off for me more than once.
How easy is it to fly I am intermediate to beginner
This is one of the easiest warbirds I've ever flown. Ground handling is very easy going and the plane is very responsive. If you're an intermediate flyer, you won't have any problems with this plane.
What battery did you use?
A 4s2200 or 2650.
@@RCVideoReviews how were you able to Correct the CG Right?
@@elelnoel5196 It's safe to start with the factory CG on this plane. You can adjust to taste from there.
@@RCVideoReviews I'm Using 3000mah Admiral and It's Still nose Heavy.
@@elelnoel5196 Oh...I didn't go that big. 2650 is the biggest I've flown.
bonjour, j'ai cet appareil depuis 1 an et je vole régulièrement avec, s'il est vrai qu'il est simple a piloter et ne pose aucun problème en vol, c'est totalement diffèrent lors des décollages et atterrissages, en effet son train est trop faible et ou aurait nécessité des amortisseurs car en dehors du fait qu'il se déforme après quelques atterrissage il fini par traverser l'aile, évidemment, inutile d'essayer de décoller ou d'atterrir sur de l'herbe, il fini systématiquement sur le nez avec plus ou moins de casse d'hélice, cela va de soi. personnellement j'ai changé le train d'atterrissage pour un modèle avec amortisseur et plus résistant, bien sur le cg a changer, mais de peu 78mm au lieu de 75mm, c'est compensable! reste a le tester en vol car je pense qu'il va manquer de puissance vu que j'ai modifié son poids, mais je vous raconterai cela plus tard. pour terminer, je ne suis pas fan de dynam, cela manque de qualité matériel mais on ne peu tout avoir n'est ce pas? qualité matériel ou prix il faut choisr.
Dynam est définitivement un compromis entre le prix et la qualité. Leurs avions ont tendance à bien voler une fois que vous les alimentez correctement. Les trains d'atterrissage sont généralement une faiblesse. Bonne chance avec vos modifications.
Left wing Nav light Green?
Port Left "RED"
Someone in the factory stuffed Up
Yup. Happened quite a bit on Dynam planes.
@@RCVideoReviews oh ok.
Cheers for that