Australian Open 2009 Final Nadal vs Federer Extended Highlights
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 03. 2013
- Resumen extendido de la final del Open de Australia de 2009, con lo mejores y más importantes puntos (bolas de break, puntos de set, etc). Para mi, uno de los partidos de tenis más épicos.
Es mi primera edición de vídeo, es bastante simple, pero yo quería tener un recuerdo más amplio de esta final y ya que estamos compartirla por si a alguien más le gusta.
Extended highlights of the Australian Open Final of 2009, with the best and most important points (break points, set points...). For me, one of the most epic tennis matches.
This is my first video edition, is so simple, but I wanted to have this resume of the final in my collection and share with you.
Federer-Nadal matches totally raised the bar.
It's great to see Djokovic-Nadal or Djokovic-Federer, but it's truly magical when Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal play each other.
technically this is one of the best matches of all time.
Ridiculous quality of play from both- insane tennis.
Yeah this beats the Wimbledon Fedal IMO. Best match of all time.
@@KnightMD the semis as better than this
These 2 are the greatest tennis players ever, no doubt about that. Just look at how ridiculously good they were in their prime.
+Zain Mir Federer and Nadal's bad points were bad but Djokovic's bad points were WORST back in the day (2005-07)...Giving up midway in the rallies or the match..complaining, yelling...
+Zain Mir He was talking about just the match which he was watching and that is Fedal, not Djokovic. Don't be so insecure.
+Ameya Deshpande
I'm guessing you never saw footage of Federer berating himself and breaking rackets from 1998 to 2002, or maybe you just have selective memory
hmm true..that way Nadal has been most disciplined given all drug allegations are false...
@Rafa Nadal 2009 was a best. Reaching ao final and not dropping a set,reaching uso final easily after beating in 3 sets a freat djokovic and loosing in 5 sets to an insane del potro. Not counting rg and wimbledon
One of Nadal's best performances on a Hard Court!!!
Far from it , the us open 2010 and America hard court swing was his best on this surface
And 2013
What from it?? The movement and everything was spot in 2009 Australian open by Nadal. Its just not about winning. The level here is just ridiculous and cant be believed. This was total peak of Rafa. I know he won 2 slams in 2013 and hard court swing was nice. Same in 2010 but the quality is out of the world, not bashing from baselines.
@@JustMyOpinion05 in 2010 he faced a washed up Djokovic who still took a set off , definitely Nadal wasn't as good as he is here where he played back to back 5 setters
Gaurang Thapa I don’t think you know what washed up means lol
The 2012 Aussie final was the craziest match I’ve ever seen in terms of stamina and endurance, but this is the most insane tennis I have ever seen. Some of these points, the ball is jumping around like it’s a pinball machine. Even if you’re in great shape and good at tennis, you still have to be so mentally tough and creative to play this kind of tennis. It’s just unreal.
I think this is the highest level of tennis ever seen. I dont think we will see anything better ever.
+Redwood Trees You mean, cumulative between both players? Possibly. Sampras-Agassi have some challenges to that. Same with Borg-McEnroe. Or even Fed-Nadal Wimbledon 2007 or their 2006 Rome meeting.
This is the best match in history, agreed.
@@aisthpaoitht definitely not sampras agassi which was basically more a net game than a all-around game
27:25 best point you'll watch in tennis :)
Best point ever at 27:25, I'm not a rafa fan, but that was the most epic point in history, LEGENDARY!!!
Yeah, all shots were awesome, Federer's squash shot was just insane, and Nadal's answers were out of this world too. Nadal's squash shot from the AO 17 finals was great too, but it gets overshadowed by the amazing rally in the fifth set.
as djokovic fan .... i like these numbers 27:25,
edit: wrong time: 15:03
still lost that set though so its pointless
Well said amazing point..never seen such tennis...nadal is best tennis player ever
2009 was a sick year for Federer. 4 grand slam finals.. 2 wins.. Won in Roland Garros too.. could've easily ended with all 4 slams..
Look like Federer was out of gas on that last set. Nadal is like the energizer bunny he just keeps going and going....fantastic match.
+Leroy Jennings Federer mentally was out of gas.
27:25 One of the greatest points in history, from both guys
Nadal backhand was in another level that night.
came here, to relive this moment, and today another we get to see them again. Greatest rivalry ever
I never watched this match, so, I'm very happy to see extended highlights. What a match! Federer and Nadal were crushing balls all 5 sets. Amazing shots. I don't know if Federer ran out of gas or if Nadal was just Nadal in the end. If Federer was that emotional, then you know it was a big match that meant a lot to him. Much respect to Federer. Much respect to Nadal for the way he handled his victory speech. Nadal barely held up the trophy because Roger was so crushed by the loss. Once again, Nadal is equal in both victory and defeat. Nadal is My Champion.
This is the best match I have ever seen. I come here and watch these highlights every now and then and just wonder how on earth did Roger lose this final.
nadal is the goat
@@anthonysiumelgarejo1357 well after 2022 AO he has the edge with 21
And here we are in 2017 with the same duo in the AO Final again ! INCREDIBLE !
This is the best match I've ever seen, except for the 5th set. I am Roger's fan but I have the best respect for Rafa, who is one of the greatest players of all time. Stop hate comments, just enjoy the tennis.
That backhand at just after the 9:15 mark was just…I have no words🤦🏻♂️🤩
Rafa is my fave but this shows Roger at his elegant best, A truly great player.
This has to be one of the best matches of all time..the shotmaking is unreal
I‘ve never seen a level like this. I enjoyed every second and I loved it.
nadal stayed so close to the baseline the whole match, that's a huge risk when facing federer who plays faster tennis. but nadal was up to it, what a champion
Not the whole match,but his whole career. But Federer playing beautiful tennis
27:25 Here comes best ralley of the century !
I WAS JUST BRINGING BACK, THIS WONDERFUL GAME, they both show so much sportsmanship, AND GAVE IT ALL
You can sense that Federer already knew back then that he was facing the GOAT.
The GOAT on clay yes
Nicky T the overall goat 😘
There is no GOAT
Hah I doubt! He’s still probably in denial right now that he’s gonna be the #3 of all time😂
Tremendous match.Surely better than their match in WImby the previous year.In my book the best match ever.
Some of the rallies in this match were unbelievable!!!
C'est juste beau! :)
C'est pour ces moments là qu'on vit pour le tennis!
Thanks men!
some of the best points and hitting of any match ever
Nadal's 6th Grand Slam Victory and his 1st Australian Open win. The 7th Grand Slam Final between Nadal and Federer (5-2). Epic stuff!
rafa is amazing
thanks for the great highlights:)
Forgot how good Nadal was in his bulky prime.
This is what an AO final should be like along with the 2012 between Rafa and Nole.
All the Djoker v. Murray AO finals were pathetic and painful to watch to be honest.
Rafa Nadal circa 2008,2009, 2010 was simply above everyone else. The speed, shot making, the ferocious CC backhand and of course the fearhand were all clicking for sure.
This is the period when Nadal consistently beat prime Federer on all surfaces and we were lucky to have legendary matches like this one.
There's no comparison to the Djoker v Federer finals of 2015 when clearly one man was at his very best and the other had lost speed and edurance. This is what makes Nadal a better player than djoker in my opinion.
And so damaging to his body that he's basically done by now. Federer can still play consistenly good tennis. But I agree with the rest, boring Djokovic - Murray finals are boring...
I also thought nadal game was insane and therefore he would eventually "get hurt". It happened, but if you look back and see his career.. It's been worth ;_D
He's back. I think he's favorite to win the AO this year.
AO has always been a hard surfrace for Rafa. I expect a real test vs Dimitrov but certainly this looks like a promissing year for Rafa.
Luis Durán For me the real test to show his level was vs Zverev. After losing the 4th set, the Nadal of 2015-16 would have lost that game. But the 2017 could close it. And we have seen today that a fast serve is not enough against the Best Rafa. I'm really hopeful, the 3 players left have one handed backhand, and Nadal knows how to beat this, with top spins to their backhand side.
Rafaa is amazing is the best tennis player of the world
Federer best performance ever! The last set he played great but was tired and committed more unforced errors than Nadal, havent seen such display of agressiveness and variety, Nadal played great as well
Yupp. You are right.
amazing uploaded thank you
Thank you for watching :)
Rafa's serve has improved so much since this match. Compare his serving here to his 2010 and 2013 US Open Wins
The level of crazy shots and defense they play one another is unreal!!!
Melhor jogo que já vi foi este...os dois em plena forma física, voando baixo, mostrando o melhor de seus golpes...É pra assistir e servir de inspiração...
This final was so much better than Wimbledon 08.
I remember this being such a disappointing match as a Federer fan because his first serve was NOT working later into the match. And Nadal's backhand was another level that night
Nadal was really attacking the backhand...a really tough matchup for Federer. Nadal's backhand is much better than Federer's.
No, it's really not, in fact I think that Federer's backhand is at least on par with Nadal's. Nadal's backhand, unlike his monster forehand, is nothing special: Gasquet, Wawrinka, Thiem and Djokovic, all of them have better backhands just to name a few. The problem is the opposite: by having that kind of high-bouncing forehand (and being a leftie) Nadal can attack Federer's backhand better than anyone else. That's how he managed to constantly beat him. That and running faster and using slow courts better.
Alberto Blasi Upto 2010, Nadal's backhand was pretty good. Since 2011 it has deteriorated. I think it has to do with his right knee. All the pros hit open stance and load up on the back leg but he can't load up on the right knee when he's hitting the backhand.
I can't understand the hate comments from both sides . Don't they know that Rafa and Roger have always been friends and have great respect for each other ? True class acts . Pity that some of their fans don't follow their steps .
Third set 4-4 0-40 on Nadal's serve was Fed's big chance for taking that set and possibly the match in 4 sets, but his low BP conversion % was as usual against him. I think he didn't even serve well that night.
Thanks for these highlights, Sergio! Two masters at work. I'm impressed by Roger's high topspin backhand shots. He doesn't play them often nowadays, does he?
That gotta be the most intense tennis match of all time!!
Congratulations for the video. Your love for the sport and your hard work are printed in this video. Go on!
Only Nadal could have beat this version of Federer
Guess delpo, novak, soderling, etc. Somehow don't beat him too?
@@497novakl i meant in this tournament
Ofcourse. Nadal till 2010 was the scariest tennis player ever. After that not so much
@@gotimlol5318 because Novak became monster later.
@@gotimlol53182013 was nadal's best years. Won 5 atp master 2GS and 71-7 Win lose.
5:45 Who in the world would've saved those 2 points if not Nadal?
More like 15:57
Definitely 27:25
Greatest rival and despite it both are very good friends
Fed- Rafa🥰
We will see again this Sunday !
oh man losing that third set must have hurt ALOT
Beautiful.
The goat vs the goat
the quality of baseline rallies was out of this world.. sad to see this not anymore..
for me this match until the 5th set was better than W08 final
For sure. Federer wasn't in great form at Wimbledon that year
And W07 was even better until the 4th...
@@stretch90 federer was in his prime. Here he played a but better
@@matteo964This was federer's last prime year.
@@arslaanpasha3334 no, Federer's last prime year is clearly early 2010. There is no way 2008-2009 fed isn't his prime.
nadal holds the best record against fed and nole so he is the goat
By your logic Dominik Hrbaty is the GOAT since he has a positive h2h against Rafa and Fed
TheSaxophoneMan16 I hate it when people like you throw extreme examples and call it "logic". His point centers around the fact that nadal has a better h2h, but nadal also has 14 grand slams (3 less than federer), and several more than nole. The h2h that nadal has over federer and nole goes over a total of 50 matches and not single digit h2hs. So try using REAL logic sometime.....
issac cheung Going by what his criteria are for GOAT, Hrbaty is the goat.
Nadal rarely made it to the final when Federer was winning 8 out of 10 possible Grand Slams from mid-2005 to 2008, and Nadal was number 2 through this whole period.
Nadal only has this good a record against Federer because Federer kept making it far enough to reach Nadal after he wasn't able to win as many Grand Slams, had Nadal done the same it would be different.
Now look at it like this : Most of the Federer defeats in his top period were against top players like Nadal (against which he had a positive record at the time), whereas Nadal had many defeats against lesser players. If you see it like this, it makes more sense that Roger is the stronger player. Both are exceptionally good of course, but the fact that Federer's winning period had so little matches with Nadal outside of clay makes their head to head record not so relevant.
Their head to head on clay on the other hand is very relevant as Federer has kept coming back to meet him on this surface during his whole career, and Nadal definitely is the king of Clay, so strong on this surface.
tauruxbis Nadal was beating him like A DOG all the time. Remembr Dubai 06, Miami 04 and countless others. Nadal is the GOAT!
Anyone who thinks Rafa is a clay court specialist needs to have their head examined. Rafa won the French Open more than times than anyone has or ever will, but he could beat anyone on any surface, especially 2008-2009. Federer will always be considered one of three best players ever. We were all lucky to witness the greatest era in tennis history.
CANT GET TIRED OF WATCHING NADAL DOMINATION OF FEDERER OVER THE YEARS YEAH BABY!
And nice long highlights.
still miss those years
great match--good video quality--scoreboard sux
Nadal is much more enjoyable to watch then roger! Love how Nadal goes from extreme defense to offense! i love it!
+MRDESTRUCTION26 Yeah, Frauderer is a boring piece of shit.
federer is the most enjoyable player to watch
he plays fast, his placement is outstanding
he volleys like no one and his serve is great
he is the G.O.A.T
come on roger!!!
Love when Rafa fangirls say Nadal is more enjoying. Amazing.
And now we get to see a rematch for 2017
these guys can always provide intense gaming :) lets wait for 2014 semis, both in good shape, esepcially Fed
Finally Nadal beats Federer ^^... I expected more from Fed today :(
Sergio Santos Sampedro yeah me too; i think he can do better :) i mean lossing in better style :P
+Sergio Santos Sampedro Finally Nadal beats Roger? man you were smoking Nadal defeated Roger 23 times while Fed beat Rafa 11 times
Yeah with 16 times on clay. Let them play 16 times on grass or london finals surface. Then lets see the h2h record. Also put them in same age. I can garantuee u it wont be 26-11 lol
It may not be 23-11 but it would still be in favour of Nadal and by quite a margin. Also, what about the 9-2 in GS and the fact that Fed's last win over Nadal was on his favourite surface and when Nadal was only 21 over 9 years ago. 3-0 at the AO, 5-0 at the FO and Fed had to rely on Soderling for his only RG, that's sad, whereas Rafa has beaten Fed at Wimbledon.
Man this match is such high level of tennis probably the best fedal match in terms of how high the level was , both could have had a fair shot vs prime djoker with this level in Melbourne
It must have been very difficult for Roger to face someone who is both a superior tennis player and also more handsome.
Both were at their absolute peaks. Difference is that Nadal is just better.
Madre mía Santos, casi 60.000 visitas y más de 60 comentarios, es tu vídeo TOP jajaja
This is level ehhh jajaja Y tengo el otro que va a llegar a las 1.000 visitas, el exito me abruma xD
Best ever Tennis final. Too high intensity and skill.
What Rafa does to win the two points from 5:44 was incredible.
What a match!!!
Love the end
5:55 Great point by Rafa
For me this is better than Wimbledon 2008 Final
5:46 Not that fed did anything wrong here, but when he gets leads in matches his habit is to net rush a LOT of points, stop doing what got him the lead.
Lol federer complaining about someone calling the ball out at deuce 2-5 5th set... you were never going to get Nadals cross court backhand back hahah just stop
Nadal is a legend.. Federer is bigger than 100 such legends.. Federer is the GOAT.. The royal king of the tennis..
there was some brotherly love at the end from nadal to federer, so i guess nadal was after all federed, like the sign on the stands said. :D
long live them both, the two gladiators of the white lines 88ft across a surface
" Rafael Nadal, a man for all surfaces "
Australian Open 2017 final?
federer fans forever bitter over 23-10 h2h :D
Nadal fans forever bitter 17 >>> 14.
***** You act like he already won the Australian Open. Google "Happy Birthday Rafael Nadal! You are probably too old to pass Federer" by FiveThirtyEight. The website is not a fan of Federer by any means. It is just an statitician throwing numbers and giving Nadal a 22% chance of passing Federer. Those are not bad odds, but not great either. Judging by his form at this AO, if he doesn't win RG, his odds go well below 20%. See you in a years time ;)
***** Guess who else is playing ;) So I guess we don't know until they both retire. I'm not saying Nadal can't end up his career with 17 Slams or more. I'm saying the chances are not as great as you think. But what he won't achieve is 300 weeks at No.1, or 1,000+ match wins in his career, 6 World Tour Finals titles. Or 5 Slams in another tournament not RG, among other things. Federer is not the best just because of 17 Slams. He is the best because he is the most consistent player in the history of the game. Consistent all year long, in all the Grand Slams.
They are close?? Yahh..thanks but no thanks.
Anybody else notice Nadal's kryptonite ( green headband and hints on shirt) to Federer's superman (blue)? Eh, eh?! Just something to fancy
27.45 : "every one of those shots was brilliant"👌
27:45
That was a crushing loss for fed... Then he went on to win the next two majors. lol
Yes, because his main opponents were Soderling and Roddick...
Bruh, not fed's fault that Murray, Joker, or Nadal didn't show up.
hopy51 Soderling whom beat Nadal..
And Roddick whom beat murray
Yeah, Nadal kinda did Federer a favour that year.
You mean the same Soderling who crushed Nadal in the 4th round anrer?d then the same Soderling who got crushed in the final by Federer?
After 4 Years They are gonna face against each other today in the same championship ☻ 29/01/2017
Lol I love how the umpire decided to intervene on a call that no human eye could possibly see.
These lads on this form would have demolished a prime Sampras.
Not on fast courts
Rafa vs Federer ...rafa Vs Djokovic matches are high voltage matches Rafa will be simply soooooooper...
ANYBODY SO EXCITED FOR TONIGHT?!?!
Djokovic lacks the shotmaking and variety that these 2 used to have. Their all court games are better than novaks. You can't just hit the ball back and be consistent in order to beat fedal in their primes at slams. Djokovic wins today because hes fitter and more consistent, but with fedals fitness at this time, its a whole other story. Funny thing is that you will never see nole fans commenting in these videos. You only find them primarily in videos from 2018-present, which is hilarious.
More consistent means he’s better, do whatever you need to win…
@@NamTran-xc2ip dude hes not beating this fedal with just being consistent. Both of them here can rally for days and push the pace. Djokovic would have to play ULTRA aggressive to beat these versions, which he doesn’t do anymore.
@@goderer2057 he has beaten them plenty of times. Whenever fedal loses, because Djokovic was better, just like when Djokovic loses, means fedal better than him, not because they are ‘injured’ or ‘old’ or whatever excuses you’re going to make. Djokovic is better than Federer more times but not yet Nadal.
@@NamTran-xc2ip so why did he overtake the h2h when fed was was in his mid 30’s? Lol he’s not beating this version in AO 09, im sorry. I just cant visualize him taking 3 sets off both fedal here.
@@goderer2057 Federer also took advantage of the h2h when Novak was a teenager. It goes both ways
Federer-Nadal rivalry is proof skill doesn't dominate tennis anymore it's all about match-ups and whose most athletic.
+Christopher Harris Actually it does prove that the better player usually wins. It's all about skill, mental toughness and inteliigence and Rafa destroys him in all that. The only times he's lost it either luck or Rafa's bad form.
+samfisher5 Luck or bad form? LOL Nadal has no more skill than Federer. Ask Uncle Toni. Heck, Nadal and Uncle Toni both say that Djokovic is a better player than Nadal. And Federer too. Toni specifically said that Federer is better because Federer was #1 for 5 years (Nadal only 3) and Federer has 17 Slams (Nadal has 14). So, are you saying you know more about tennis than Nadal's coach?!
Also, Nadal is not more mentally strong than Federer. You just have to see all those match points Federer has saved over the years. Federer hardly complains in a tenis court. The guy doesn't even make sounds, or over exagerated come ons! He just plays tennis. Nadal's favorable H2H is based on an excessive number of clay court matches which clearly favor Nadal's style over Federer, and too few grass court matches. That, coupled with a lot of matches played with Federer hurt, and few matches played with Nadal hurt or in bad form (since 2013, they have played ZERO times). And I said it prior to Cinci, Nadal is not going to make the Quarters just to avoid Federer. And what did he do? He lost to crappy Lopez in the previous round. LOL
+samfisher5 Nadal is the queen of complaints. Tell me, when has Federer bitched about anything? Out of the top of my head, this is Nadals bitching: 1- Ranking being a 52 weeks instead of 2 year 2- WTF not being played on clay 3- the blue clay of Madrid, where he said he wasn't playing next year unless they switched it back to red clay 4- bitching about Bernardes being the chair umpire in his games. Federer is the least bitchy player in the league. The guy comes out and does his job. Never complains. There's a reason he is voted by his peer as the most fair player out there.
Clay isn't the most challenging. All surfaces have their challenge. Clay is the most physical. But other surfaces require more skill. Fast surfaces show if your technique is solid or not. That is why tenis is special: the game is different depending on which surface. And great players manage to be great at all of them. Clearly Federer is the most complete player when it comes to playing on different surfaces and being successful.
About Djokovic vs Nadal, or course Nadal prefers Federer. Nadal prefers any 1 handed backhand player over any 2 handed backhand player. The 1 hander has a way tougher time handling Nadal's forehand crosscourt. Nothing surprising here.
Federer has beaten Nadal 10 times, and none of those times Nadal was injured. Federer has beaten Nadal so badly that he has bagelled Nadal 3 times, on 3 different surfaces. A bagel is winning a set 6-0, just so you know. He even bagelled Nadal on clay! You are clearly mistaken about the fact that Federer has beaten Nadal a lot.
Nadal will retire soon because his game is crap. He is not as fast on the court anymore, and with his speed, out goes his game. He doesn't have a plan B like Federer. Also, a player of Nadal's caliber doesn't just conform with winning 250 level events. If he doesn't feel like he is capable of winning Grand Slams anymore (which he isn't), then he will call it quits. Most likely will blame an injury on why he is retiring. But we all know the truth: the competition has surpassed him and he is no longer among the best on the Tour.
+NoelAndres17 Haha, you are full of shit.
1. Frauderer is the one making excuses all the time. EVERY time he loses, he has an excuse. For example, when he was destroyed by 20 yo Djokovic at AO 2008, he made up that he was sick with mono. Pathetic piece of shit, simply can't admit that he is not as good as Djokovic. When Rafa was beating him all the time, he was excusing it all the time that it is because of the clay. Actually in the beginning, he was saying that he was as good as Nadal on clay, but then when Rafa was destroying him oever and over again he reverted to the clay excuse like all his pother fans. TO THIS DAY he excuses his losses to Nadal mainly with the clay, listen to one of his interviews recently. Nadal has proved time and time again that he ebats him everywhere, Frauderer even cried at AO when Rafa PROVED that beats him on ahrd as well at a slam. Rafa beat him three out of three times at AO, HE STILL is saying that he beats him on clay only.
Another thing, when Rafa beat him at Wimbledon, he said after the match that he lost because it was too dark.
At AO 2009, he again was bitching after the match, saying that he should ahve won and bs like that. In fact Nadal was in control the whole time and was better than him. During the match he was constanlty bitching to the umpire.
He has constanlty excused his losses to Nadal with Nadal being a lefty.
He always has excuses about the surfaces.
When he loses, there is always a reason. When Berdych beat him at Wimby 2010, he said he was injured. When Djoko beat him at USO 2010, he said that he lost because he was thinking about the final. In 2010 he said that he should ahve won. In 2013 he was constnalty excusing his losses with injuries. THE list is ENDLESS. He always has an excuse when he is losing.
2. Clay is clearly tthe most difficult surface, ask anyone who knwos tennis( as obviously you don;t. Clay is a test of everything - technque, mental strength, intellgienece, phsyque everything. The fast surfaces mainly favor servebots and big hitters. So clay doesn show if your technique is solid, huh? You don't know what you are talking about.
Grass is a compeltely irrelevant surface, it only excists because of Wimbledon, but nobody plays on that worldwide. MOST of the tennis world plays on clay. In fact Fraudere himself has learned to play the game ON CLAY, as all the other of the big four. Murray went to Barcelona to imrpvoe.
HUH, Frauderer is the most complete player? WHAT? That's why he sucks on clay and has won RG only once and can't beat Nadal there??? That's why Nadal has conquered all the other slams and won RG NINE times? Nadal is a much more versatile player than Federer. Federer only HAS A SERVE! He is a limited talentless servebot. Nadal and Djokovci are complete players with full weaponry.
3. 4 of Frauderer's wins are at the Masters Cup, which is an irrelevant tournament. Once he beat him with the refs in Miami 2005 and the two big wins at Wimbledon. Nadal has woned him all the time, so there is no comparison
Nadal beat Frauderer 6-1 6-3 6-0 in a Grand Slam final.
4. Haha, I have no problem with Nadal retiring, I am perfectly happy with his career. I don;t like seeing him lose. He has nothing to prove. Unfortunately for Frauderer, he will be remembred as Nadal's bitch and it will hit him and his fans the hardest when Rafa retires. It's over, buddy! :)
+samfisher5 About Nadal and Djokovic. Nadal says in his book that it's a lot easier to play against Federer, because sooner or later he will make a mistake. But againt Djokovic it's almost impossible to come up with a clea tactic, because he ha no weaknesses and is a complete player. You simply have to play your best tennis yo have a chance against him.
Nadal doesn;t think that Federer is that good at all, as you wre saying. That's what he says to the media. But he's never feared him and knows he is better than him. So you are compeltely wrong about that.
Federer can't defend on his backhand side like this anymore
This opening music.... where it comes from?
Mars
30:10 Have you ever seen a filthier slice in your life? Ball so low it looked like it had to have gone through the net..
cowbow bebop was good.
Best part of the match : 35:05
Best tennis has to offer, with 2 #1 elites