I have this lens with the R5. It’s phenomenal. Sharp edge to edge even at F2. Minimal chromatic aberration, easily correctable vignetting. Most importantly, gorgeous colour rendition.
Everyone is whining about the price but the price is worth it for what you get. A totally unique zoom that nobody else can match. Sharpness and control of aberrations is superb even wide open. There’s no reason to stop down other than depth of field or light control. Rendering and 3 dimensionality are eye-poppingly good. I imagine that the ceiling for this lens is higher than what the EOS R can capture. The lens is big but the weight is well balanced.
I purchased this lens a year ago, and it stays on my camera 80% of the time. The pictures are stupid sharp even in low light. Now I have purchased the R6 to go with it and what I am able to do in low light it’s just nothing short of phenomenal
I bought this to go with my 50mm f1.0. Both heavy, both probably the best lenses ever made, both work brilliantly on my R5. The 28-70 is so good that i may even sell my 50mm F1.0.
I DID IT!! My RF 28-70mm f/2 L just came in a few days ago. I was on the fence between this RF 28-70mm f/2L and the RF 85mm f/1.2L, but since I already have the RF 85mm f/2 IS, I can wait and get the 85mm "L" version later. This RF 28-70mm f/2L has replaced my EF 24-70mm f/2.8L and I'm loving it on the EOS R5 95mm filter thread was my main reason for holding off (and the cost of it), I can't find an ExpoDisc larger than 82mm and the 95mm filters are more expensive. But it's completely worth it! Did a couple corporate group shots this week where everyone needed to be 'socially distant' and loved using this lens.
Thank you for your opinion !!!! I am choosing between buying 85 1.2 (which was my dream lenses) and between this 28-70 2.0. I love doing portraits, that is why I am not sure to choose 28-70 instead of 85. But I have already 135 2.0 which I love and maybe it is better to choose 28-70
@@SmartBeautySecrets - Depending on what you already shoot with (in addition to the 135mm), that might help make the decision. Ultimately, I ended up getting the RF 85mm f/1.2L as well, and I love that lens. I mostly shoot weddings, and my two favorite lens combinations (I shoot with two bodies) are: - RF 35mm f/1.8L IS macro, and RF 85mm f/1.2L - I've shot many weddings with *only* these two lenses. - RF 28-70mm f/2L and RF 135mm f/1.8L IS - I love the 135mm so much it's hard to choose between this combo and the combo above. Also, the RF 85mm f/1.2L and RF 28-70mm f/2L are close to the same weight, My next wish is that Canon releases a 35mm f/1.2L.
Really loving the 28-70 for weddings on the R5 ; the extra crop is nice, although I do also use the 70-200 and 85 DS :)completely replaces the 24-70s and makes the, feel more like kit lenses
I had originally planned to get the RF 50mm 1.2 for two months; only to decide on this the day before the purchase. Best lens ever. In its entire focal range.
Still unsure which one to get. I usually stick to primes and the 50 has amazing image quality, 1.2f and is lighter. But 24-70 f2 sounds amazing of course. The weight and size might be the biggest con in theory. Did you try out both lenses?
Killer lens! I shot with it all day on the wedding when I first got it. The images are stellar! Very crisp, with buttery bokeh. I still will use my old 24-70mm for the ceremony. But the 28-70mm is my new fave.
Nice!! I went for the rf 24 70 2.8 because the IS, weight and filter size(nd filters and such) because I also do a lot of video simultaneously, But yes, that lens is a lot of primes in one.
I'm pretty fortunate. My local camera shop runs a 50% off Saturday rental(you can't reserve and it's first come first serve and whatever's available) and no one really rents this lens just yet. Now I know that with the R5 and R6 out that the party is probably over of getting this bad boy for $25 bucks for Saturday and Sunday rental. Most likely I'll be getting this lens because I use it 80% of the day and is so good. Pissed I didn't get it a couple weeks ago when Canon was selling it refurbished for $2300!
You said about 75% of your wedding shots are from this lens. With that said what other lens do you switch to and why do you switch to it? Been debating on getting this lens and it seems amazing. Just want to pick your brain a little and see what else u switch to and why. Was thinking on getting this and the RF 35 macro for my detail shots.
i still prefer having two bodies 35mm and 85mm each . it is dangerous to only having one body on such an important event. also that thing is so freaking heavy. nonetheless such a great lens from canon
Coming on Saturday together with the canonR5. I am curious, I live in Belgium. Ask your; if I take pictures on a tripod how do I turn off all stabilization, including the ibis? greetings and thanks.
The R5 has an option in the menu to turn off the IS. I forget which area of the menu, but when IS is enabled it will enable it on the lens and in body.
With the R6, would u recommend this f2 or the RF 24-70 f2.8? I’m not a professional, and will only purchase 1 lens for my R6 for shooting my kids & pets. Which would u think would be more suitable for me? :) thank you!
Those are both AMAZING lenses as well, this one almost covers both focal lengths which is why I love it....one camera instead of two hanging on my back
@@greggreenhaw agree with that one. Traded in my Ef 24-70 2.8 II and a ef 70-200 2.8 II to fund my Rf 28-70. Definitely not selling my 35 and 85 1.4 Ef primes.
I have this lens with the R5. It’s phenomenal. Sharp edge to edge even at F2. Minimal chromatic aberration, easily correctable vignetting. Most importantly, gorgeous colour rendition.
How is the stabilization with video?
Quote: “Canon's IBIS system can deliver eight stops even on the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM - a lens that has no stabilization at all. “
Everyone is whining about the price but the price is worth it for what you get. A totally unique zoom that nobody else can match. Sharpness and control of aberrations is superb even wide open. There’s no reason to stop down other than depth of field or light control. Rendering and 3 dimensionality are eye-poppingly good. I imagine that the ceiling for this lens is higher than what the EOS R can capture. The lens is big but the weight is well balanced.
I purchased this lens a year ago, and it stays on my camera 80% of the time. The pictures are stupid sharp even in low light. Now I have purchased the R6 to go with it and what I am able to do in low light it’s just nothing short of phenomenal
Thanks for sharing your experience. I have the R6 and now I shall save for it
Good or not
I bought this to go with my 50mm f1.0. Both heavy, both probably the best lenses ever made, both work brilliantly on my R5. The 28-70 is so good that i may even sell my 50mm F1.0.
I DID IT!! My RF 28-70mm f/2 L just came in a few days ago.
I was on the fence between this RF 28-70mm f/2L and the RF 85mm f/1.2L, but since I already have the RF 85mm f/2 IS, I can wait and get the 85mm "L" version later.
This RF 28-70mm f/2L has replaced my EF 24-70mm f/2.8L and I'm loving it on the EOS R5
95mm filter thread was my main reason for holding off (and the cost of it), I can't find an ExpoDisc larger than 82mm and the 95mm filters are more expensive.
But it's completely worth it! Did a couple corporate group shots this week where everyone needed to be 'socially distant' and loved using this lens.
That’s awesome!!
Thank you for your opinion !!!! I am choosing between buying 85 1.2 (which was my dream lenses) and between this 28-70 2.0. I love doing portraits, that is why I am not sure to choose 28-70 instead of 85. But I have already 135 2.0 which I love and maybe it is better to choose 28-70
@SmartBeautySecrets I would agree if you already have a 135 go with the 28-70. Super versatile.
@@SmartBeautySecrets - Depending on what you already shoot with (in addition to the 135mm), that might help make the decision.
Ultimately, I ended up getting the RF 85mm f/1.2L as well, and I love that lens.
I mostly shoot weddings, and my two favorite lens combinations (I shoot with two bodies) are:
- RF 35mm f/1.8L IS macro, and RF 85mm f/1.2L - I've shot many weddings with *only* these two lenses.
- RF 28-70mm f/2L and RF 135mm f/1.8L IS - I love the 135mm so much it's hard to choose between this combo and the combo above.
Also, the RF 85mm f/1.2L and RF 28-70mm f/2L are close to the same weight,
My next wish is that Canon releases a 35mm f/1.2L.
This lens is almost as beautiful as Jen! ❤ I am definitely buying this with the R5! 😍
Can't wait to see what YOU do with it! I know it will be amazing!
I will get my R5 & 28-70 next week :-)
Great lens! I never saw a sharper zoom lens - the wedding lens in combination to the R5/R6 just perfect (but the weight)
Exactly. The weight on a long day can wear on you a bit but performance wise it’s probably worth dealing with it!
Really loving the 28-70 for weddings on the R5 ; the extra crop is nice, although I do also use the 70-200 and 85 DS :)completely replaces the 24-70s and makes the, feel more like kit lenses
I had originally planned to get the RF 50mm 1.2 for two months; only to decide on this the day before the purchase. Best lens ever. In its entire focal range.
Still unsure which one to get. I usually stick to primes and the 50 has amazing image quality, 1.2f and is lighter. But 24-70 f2 sounds amazing of course. The weight and size might be the biggest con in theory. Did you try out both lenses?
Killer lens! I shot with it all day on the wedding when I first got it. The images are stellar! Very crisp, with buttery bokeh. I still will use my old 24-70mm for the ceremony. But the 28-70mm is my new fave.
Honestly...WHEN I do make the jump to mirrorless, this and the EF 70-200mm f2.8 L iii will be my lenses of choice.
Nice!! I went for the rf 24 70 2.8 because the IS, weight and filter size(nd filters and such) because I also do a lot of video simultaneously, But yes, that lens is a lot of primes in one.
Great review Michael! I hope to get it later this year. I shot with it before and it's definitely an amazing lens especially for weddings
Thanks buddy! BTW, you smoked me on the Greatest Showman Ride on the Peloton!
@@MichaelAnthonyphoto lol better push those pedals harder next time :)
@@YaneckWasiek It's gonna take 1000 squats a week plus a lot of practice to catch up to you buddy......
I'm pretty fortunate. My local camera shop runs a 50% off Saturday rental(you can't reserve and it's first come first serve and whatever's available) and no one really rents this lens just yet. Now I know that with the R5 and R6 out that the party is probably over of getting this bad boy for $25 bucks for Saturday and Sunday rental. Most likely I'll be getting this lens because I use it 80% of the day and is so good. Pissed I didn't get it a couple weeks ago when Canon was selling it refurbished for $2300!
Good investment, I’m looking to get into weddings and looking at this or the 24-70, to eliminate changing lenses often
Ordered it..cant wait to get it.
I just bought the RF 24-70 2.8 and after seeing this video I wanna buy the 28-70mm... Too bad I ain't rich to do that. LOL
You said about 75% of your wedding shots are from this lens. With that said what other lens do you switch to and why do you switch to it? Been debating on getting this lens and it seems amazing. Just want to pick your brain a little and see what else u switch to and why. Was thinking on getting this and the RF 35 macro for my detail shots.
likely something like 70-200
Likely 70-200
I bought this lens for one reason only: it's bigly!
Incredible lens. One comment that most people make when they see it. “That looks expensive” 🤷♂️
i still prefer having two bodies 35mm and 85mm each . it is dangerous to only having one body on such an important event. also that thing is so freaking heavy. nonetheless such a great lens from canon
I agree with you, 2 bodies is a must
this lens makes me want a canon body with my a9's sensor!
How do you like it now? And would you get it over the 24-70mm
It feels like inexpensive plastic in my hands. Ly 24-70 L II feels more robust. the $3,000 price point is getting up there with the otus.
I'm debating if I should get this or 24-70 f2.8IS + 50mm 1.2
It will be more expensive haha
Coming on Saturday together with the canonR5.
I am curious, I live in Belgium.
Ask your; if I take pictures on a tripod how do I turn off all stabilization, including the ibis?
greetings and thanks.
The R5 has an option in the menu to turn off the IS. I forget which area of the menu, but when IS is enabled it will enable it on the lens and in body.
It's the best lens ever.
I prefer the standard 24 - 70 f2.8 ...My new Nikon Mirrorless version is Killer
That's awesome! Nikon and Canon have been putting out amazing glass! Have you had a chance to use this one yet?
Ordered. 👍
I want that lens so bad after renting it for a week lol.
With the R6, would u recommend this f2 or the RF 24-70 f2.8? I’m not a professional, and will only purchase 1 lens for my R6 for shooting my kids & pets. Which would u think would be more suitable for me? :) thank you!
It’s one of the most expensive lens as the RF85mm F1.2 DS is at the same price as that 28-70 F2 at the time of your review.
Will it work well with my 6D Mark I camera as well? I don't have the mirrorless camera yet
Will it work well with my Mark IV camera as well? I don't have the mirrorless camera yet
sharp from corner to corner you say..........maybe check again
I already have RF15-35mm don't know should I add RF 28-70
I'm thinking of switching to canon, partly because of this lens.
Like people forget we used to have only 1 card slot. 😁
I want this lens so bad. I shoot with 35mm & 85mm for weddings
Those are both AMAZING lenses as well, this one almost covers both focal lengths which is why I love it....one camera instead of two hanging on my back
just keep your lenses and get a 2nd body
@@greggreenhaw agree with that one. Traded in my Ef 24-70 2.8 II and a ef 70-200 2.8 II to fund my Rf 28-70. Definitely not selling my 35 and 85 1.4 Ef primes.
0:35 those lips
a waste of money...for what? try shooting the whole wedding if you are not a body builder with this lens...nothing a 24-70 can not do and with IS!!!!
🤣
Way to expansive
Its too big