How Ghostbusters' 450-Pound Monster Was Created | Movies Insider
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 12. 2021
- While there are shots so complicated that they require full CGI, many movies still try to make practical creatures that can interact with actors on set. For “Ghostbusters: Afterlife,” creature effects designer Arjen Tuiten and his team were tasked with bringing the terror dog from the original “Ghostbusters” movie back to life. This required creating a 450-pound animatronic out of lifelike materials. They placed 21 motors in its face to allow for realistic expressions such as snarling, squinting, and breathing. Meanwhile, the team created a separate terror dog leg to terrify Paul Rudd in a close-up shot. And a more traditional, but no less complicated cable system allowed a skeleton puppet to actually pick up a coffee mug.
Follow Arjen on Instagram to see more of his special makeup effects work:
/ _a_r_j_e_n_
MORE MOVIES INSIDER VIDEOS:
How Bleeding Prosthetics Are Created For Movies And TV | Movies Insider
• How Bleeding Prostheti...
How Marvel’s 'Shang-Chi' Pulled Off Its Seven Minute Bus Fight | Movies Insider
• How Marvel’s 'Shang-Ch...
How Scream Artists Create The Perfect Screams For Movies & TV | Movies Insider
• How Scream Artists Cre...
------------------------------------------------------
#Ghostbusters #MoviesInsider #Insider
Insider is great journalism about what passionate people actually want to know. That’s everything from news to food, celebrity to science, politics to sports and all the rest. It’s smart. It’s fearless. It’s fun. We push the boundaries of digital storytelling. Our mission is to inform and inspire.
Subscribe to our channel and visit us at: www.insider.com
Insider on Facebook: / insider
Insider on Instagram: / insider
Insider on Twitter: / thisisinsider
Insider on Snapchat: / 4020934530
Movies Insider on Snapchat: / 9616609930
Insider on TikTok: / insider
How Ghostbusters Makes Hyperrealistic Practical Creatures | Movies Insider - Krátké a kreslené filmy
A mix of practical effects and CGI is always the best way to go. Makes the movie cool.
Yep. It worked for Jurassic Park and it also works for Ghostbusters too.
Wow that's interesting
And feels more realistic. More movies need to do this.
Also save more money too
Completely agree, movies nowadays have lost sight of that and just do cgi
Neither practical nor CG can do everything, but when combined together in a complimentary way the results are amazing!
Actually, CGI can do everything. The biggest drawback is all the man hours that one needs to log in order to make a scenery, object or both realistic for just one frame. Using practical effects and then adding CGI on top of it cuts down on half the time, if not more.
I am so freaking happy that practical effects are making a comeback! CGI is everywhere now, it's cool to see something more physical. I'd never go anywhere near the creatures, but still.
Go and reduce fat, noone ask for ur cmmnt
@@AdityaYadav-qy4qy well, 118 people liked it, so I wouldn't say it's a worthless comment 🤣
Who you gonna call
They tried to kill and bury the nostalgia in 2016 but the nostalgia came back, even stronger than before and conquered the destined path... Thank You Jason Reitman...
The fans won the battle!
So great that "real" FX are more and more back in movies.
But too bad they're all sequels and reboots.
@@joeybaseball7352 you have to start somewhere, i guess
I hope so, Ghostbusters 2016 almost killed me.
I knew practical effects were used for the terror dogs again of Ghostbusters: Afterlife, I just knew it.
I love this behind-the-scenes stuff.
The practical and visual effects that were used for the terror dogs of the Afterlife film are beyond mind-blowing.
first thing i said to... its practial and puppets with right mixed cgi for these dogs at they look amazing..... but the animatronic dogs from 1984 still looks better and more scary thats awesome....
7:50 *I love how they move the eyes around like if it was an actual Terror Dog getting makeup for the movie:*
This is evidence that something was lost with the heavier reliance on CGI
I love how they used animatronics in the new ghost busters instead of all cgi for the dogs, really gave the movie more of that nostalgia keeping it close to the original
I hate to break it to you, but CGI was also used for the terror dogs of Ghostbusters: Afterlife and it was actually quite impressive.
@@JoshuaModerwell yeah, I noticed that they used cgi in the movie too but I agree that they way they did it was really impressive!
@@smartie_martie I think it was more than impressive, it was mind-blowing.
Actually, I think beyond mind-blowing would be a better way to put it.
So much work just for one creature/monster/whatever. It's fascinating (and admirable) to watch.
The terror dog looks awesome
Practical effects are the best, makes movies have a more magical touch.
I wish it had been done that way in the new Jurassic World movies
These guys are doing incredibly work
Love practical effects!
I want a duplicate of the Terror Dog animatronic in my house so that if anyone tries to rob me they'd be scarred for life.
Using practical FX was one of the best parts of Afterlife... I think we're all "CGI'd" out... I hope the industry goes back to using more practical FX and use CGI as "icing on the cake" rather than the entire cake..
Please do more of these!
This is the way to reboot a franchise in a respectful way to departed actors imo
I've wanted to snuggle one of these lovely pups since the original release in the 80s and I want to even more now. But seriously, the artistry involved here is insane
Gozer looked amazing and the terror dog looked amazing.
This is amazing. Beautifully done.
WoW! This is the best. PRACTICAL as much as possible!
While I'm very glad they decided to use some practical effects in GB: Afterlife, I still think the terror dog puppets looked and moved better in the original film. Something about being shot on hyper clean digital cameras rather than Panavision film cameras with anamorphic lenses seemed to bring out the flaws in the newer puppet. It just didn't seem as convincing. Also, the lighting was better in the original GB, more three-dimensional shadowing and cinematic. When they showed the Afterlife terror dog puppet in the store, the lighting was very flat and bright like a sitcom and it didn't feel quite right.
These guys should make a doom movie
38 years since I saw the first movie and the terror dogs still scare the piss out of me...
Its so crazy how much dedication and effort is put into these sets and just little details that pay off in the long run so drastically, they did a really good job on realism and just pulling it all together so smoothly while keeping a comfortable amount of the original movie present
2:45 I like how the guy interacts with the terror dog.😀
I ❤ The CGI One! It Looks So Realistic!
That is why the terror dogs look so familiar compared to the original movie!
If only Harold Ramis could see this.
WOW!! SUPER KOOL!!! I LUV THIS kinda stuff!! These guys R AWESOME!! GREAT job guys!!!
Nice special effects.
Awesome!
BRAVO!👏🏾
Amazing work they did!!!...
Quite intricate. I would have given up.
Talented for sure.
What a creative challenge?
Close in real life artempts.
Professional leveled💙
Results of hard work always great
This is incredible..Thank you for sharing it with us!
Просто прелесть!!!
pls use more of this technology i am sick of CGI
I’m trying
Nothing wrong with cgi, but Hollywood uses it incredibly excessively.
i cannot believe I am this early
🤣 I think the last time you were early was when you were going to class at Hogwarts.
@@Reaperguy67 i was even late on that one lol
@@HarryPotter-hi6zy lol I see. I have to make a Harry Potter reference at some point
This makes the movie better. Lmao.
I would love to find this in a Halloween spirit store
This is the work that really makes me respect Hollywood as a whole, sure they make some over the top cgi stuff and sometimes lack actually good movies, but my respect goes to the people who make these movies feel real
What an awesome video!!
I LOVE THIS
Wow super technology
This is freaking cool
Practical FX > CGI
Why does the original dog still look way better? The lighting?
So nice ❤️❤️❤️ video thank you By
So cool😃
Nice work.
0:52 I think we can all agree what looks more terrifying
Yeah the newer one
@@breadkin6534 buddy are we looking at the same picture??
@@DuckiestBoat959 nope im looking at the newer one
Yep the original terror dog is super scary and far superior in design and movement.
Wow ....
Terror dogs are my favorite character
Wooooow😲
Cool
0:31 The Terror Dogs in the original Ghostbusters were incredibly frightening.
Yes that fear element was lost in this redesign. The artistry just isn't there anymore.
@@toffee20 Nonsense
@@toffee20 I don't think they were as scary as they were in the 1984 film.
@@danielwilliamson6180 Totally agree. They were gnarly looking in the original and moved like some sort of amphibian ape.
In Afterlife they looked plastic and cartoonish with very generic movements.
You’re no Harryhausen, that’s for sure.
Making practicle is hard as the CGI. So the team doubled their headache... Btw praticle look more realistic than cg...😁😁
Wonderhow much it cost to build this? And I love practical effects
THE ZOMBIE IS FREAKY!
I love terror bog🐕😈🧟♂️
REAL = BETTER than CGI. CGI should, like in this situation, be a tool to add to and help real props and costumes, not always an be all end all.
I'd like to pet Vinz from Ghostbusters Afterlife only if he's in a good mood. If I had a female Terror Dog with noticeably longer horns, I would name it "Maggie".
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
..Is there any subject to study on animatronics solely?...Is this included in film studies or you have to learn it separately through workshops or specific courses?... Esp. in the US...Does anyone here knows about it?
👍👍👍👍
4:40 The original Terror Dog is still better by design alone.
Man I bought a pizza and you can do spins every weekend and you can get like a trip to New York and cinema tickets for free to go to ghostbusters frozen empire
I'm from Bollywood industry i think still we are too behind compared to Hollywood industry. So many hard work behind the screen .🙏
The hulk would have got that practical effect animatronics in movies except 1997 unmade
Kankuro and granny chio will be laugh at this
practical trumps cgi more than people care to think.
I HAVE ATTACHED MY RESUME FOR YOUR REFERENCE AND HOPE TO HEAR FROM YOU SOON AS I AM CURRENTLY WORKING ON THE SAME AND I
Doooope
400 pounds?? They basically made the actual monster 😮
Hi
Ok,who brought the dog??
If I'm not wrong the T-Rex from Jurassic Park was the most complex creature made of animatronic until the came of the Alien Queen from Aliens and Aliens vs Predator.
Aliens came before Jurassic Park.
@@JediKnight207 OH yeah I forgot that.
In that case the Alien Quenn puppet from AVP had to be the most complex. However that was in 2004, now I don't know if exist another puppet that have more complex designs that Alien Queen. Maybe Guillermo del Toro has something 🤔 also the movie Shin Godzilla had some interesting puppets and animatronics 🤔
I wouldn't call it "hyper realistic" or even realistic to begin with, but the look itself is aesthetically pleasing.
Capturing the drool before it falls off would have been annoying, I wonder why they didn't add a drool pump inside the mouth
Well, the video does mention a lot of servos already in the Terror Dog's head, so it's possible they just couldn't fit one? The shots they show of the servos does make the head look pretty packed.
Tom Servo? ROFLMFAO
Terror dog reminds me of my ex girlfriend’s especially those red eyes
Lame
Пхахах 🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍❤️❤️❤️
*Who else appreciates the fact that he uploads consistently?* 💕
Merry christmas!
Drool like the alien would've helped but it didn't drool in the original
Greta video but to me it looked very plastic and jerky in motion, if they were aiming for the 1984 look then they nailed it though
not enought dark it was near black in originale verssion
When I 1st saw The Cabin In The Woods I thought most of not all of the monsters in the last 1/3 of the film were cgi, but as it turns out a majority of them were practical effects or even guys in costumes and makeup, and I saw the behind the scenes footage of them being made and used before the final cut.
I want to work there!
What is the company called? Do you have a website?
They never should have moved away from *real special effects* imagine where we'd be by now if we'd kept at it
Ayooo
The best way of the special effects is using animatronics, puppets, miniatures and practical effects in all the posible scenarios, and where the practical effects fail or don't work, Is there when you must use CGI.
Star wars, terminator, alien I and II, Predator I and II, Christopher Nolan cinematography, Guillermo del Toro cinematography. Are the best examples of this.
I feel that "all possible scenarios" isn't quite right. Like, there might be times where it's simply more cost effective to use CGI, even though practical effects are possible.
But you're right in that a combination of all those things is miles better than relying _purely_ on CGI. If you look at Japanese tokusatsu like Kamen Rider or Ultraman, it always looks a bit 'off' when they switch to all CGI, like when you have an Ultraman flying around shooting beams everywhere or a Kamen Rider transform his motorcycle into a rocket.
Like, the recent "Ultra Galaxy Fight: The Absolute Conspiracy" mini-series on CZcams (which comes in Japanese with English, Indonesian and several other subtitles OR an English dub) gets a lot of praise because the fight scenes are clearly stuntpeople doing the actual moves (e.g. somersaults and dropkicks) while CGI is restricted to the various Ultras beam attacks or effects like glowing blades.
I was wondering why the demon like creatures had these puppeteer like feel to them when I saw Afterlife in theaters. I'm actually not disappointed.
Claim ur “early” ticket before 1hr
Talk about attention seeking for likes. Lol
Салом. Алкум