Euro NCAP | Land Rover Freelander | 2002 | Crash test
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 08. 2009
- www.euroncap.com/tests/land_ro... Frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 29km/h into a rigid pole.
- Auta a dopravní prostředky
the 1997-2006 Land Rover Freelander was assembled in
Solihull, England
Rayong, Thailand
how reliable is an freelander 1.8 xei 3dr 99?
the engine on the 1997-2006 Land Rover Freelander
Engine
1.8 L K-Series I4
2.5 L Rover KV6 V6
2.0 L BMW M47 TD I4
2.0 L L-Series TD I4
After the side impact did the vehicle roll over?
the transmission on the 1997-2006 Land Rover Freelander
Transmission
5-speed automatic
5-speed manual
How many stars have ?
3
"yeah dude...umm sorry abour your car..."
aaaaaaa... :|
range rover needs to focus more on making their cars more safe ...because its shocking that a car of this size would have NO side airbags ...its like the free lander was made specifically for off road travel only
It's a little base model freelander from 2002....
And it’s Land Rover not Range Rover,and as stated it’s now almost 16 years old !
Range over
Hyuk-hyuk
Pretty poor performance from an off-roader, considering how drivers of these things like to throw their weight around on the road.
Don’t look good for humans traveling in it
Welcome to cars designed in the early 90s. Better than some. Don't crash in a Frontera, YOU are the crumple zone. That said, a lifted Frontera on beefy tyres does look cool!
Could be worse, could be a Fiat Seicento!
Honda CR-V and Subaru Foresteris better performance
Of the same era? You're gravely misguided.
@@skylined5534 yes. Same era.
@@vxllfireur wrong. M47 and 2.5 engines have better performance than Forester with oil leak and ugly CR-V 😂