This. This is what we want to see. On-board feeds. None of those stupid computer images, we want to see the actual video footage. Those cameras are worth every penny.
@Great White North Bear Rockets that achieve orbit must arc over because, in order to achieve orbit, one must develop a very large speed that is parallel to the surface of the earth. It is much, much more efficient to arc over and do a so-called "gravity turn" to get into orbit than it is to go straight up and then try to burn parallel to the ground at your highest point above it. Plus, the fisheye effect on this camera/flight is rather negligible, especially towards the center of the frame. You can see the curvature of the earth without the effects of fisheye at 3:19 into the flight. I'm personally unsure if you consider yourself a flat-earther. However, I wanted to post this as a response to state that the first is pretty much negligible towards the center of the frame and the second is vital for spacecraft to achieve orbit, which further defeats the concept of a flat earth.
its cool to see how the rocket structure is deformed during the maximum aerodynamic pressure phase, its clearly visible on the 1ft stage wall (0:54 - 1:14 into flight it gets compressed). Obviously the rocket needs the flexibility to withstand such forces...
I think that's an illusion: It's not the booster skin deforming (fortunately, otherwise structural failure would be following prompt) but sublimation of frost on the skin of the LOX tank during MaxQ phase.
The structure (shape of the rocket) is static throughout the clip. wtf are you talking about? There is a layer of ice forming on the body of the rocket, that happens with planes too. It happens at 7-8000 feet above ground and higher, depending on local conditions.
@@jazzochannel And no friction to see of the van Alan Belts...to penatrate does you need a hole lot bigger and more powerfull rocket than this baby. We never left our atmosphere. Even International spacecenter is not in vacuum space but still in our atmosphere. Just like the sun moon and stars
Is that sarcastic? My brain automatically reads everything sarcastically... im also questioning if it's real...for no reason other than trust issues... is that time soan believable to you? I mean i dont know...
There are 5 Atlas V’s (the First number is the diameter of the fairing, the second the amout of SRB’s, and the third the amout of second stage engine’s) you have the 411 & 511, the 421 & 521, the 431 & 531, the 541 and 551 plus know that there’s always Something assymetrical. Scott Manley has a great video of this BTW.
I'm not a flat earther or anything but you have to admit this video doesn't really prove the earth is a sphere...if anything it shows a dome. Again, I don't believe the earth is flat but after watching "Faking Space" and finding out that Nasa edits their photos of the earth from the moon for some odd reason I don't just believe whatever I'm told by people who won't let me see it with my own eyes anyway...
I wish there was a video like this but reaching the moon. I feel like it would be so damn incredible to be able to witness such a spectacle. From seeing Earth becoming a smaller and smaller marble. I hope one day we can see a video like this
ExoGhost nasa cannot go to the moon, no one can, no one has ever been, did you know China ‘went to the moon’ in 2013? Lool no of course you didn’t, the media didn’t even cover it because it was so fake lool🤣 it will be another faked moon landing filmed somewhere in Hollywood, just better graphics, hope they don’t leave the camera guy behind this time🤣🤣🤣
D REALS Aren’t you the kind of guy that believes the moon is much smaller and closer to earth since the earth is flat and the moon is under the dome or whatever? If the moon was smaller and closer, why haven’t we been able to go there? Wouldn’t it be easier to go there if it is closer?
As a science realist I have to say LOL !!!!! There is a mistake in this video that proves this is fake. I won`t point it out right now. I don`t want to see this video removed before everyone has got a chance to see it :) If you want to see some older examples . "1+ hour fake station fails"
They either land in the sea or the desert, or they burn up in re-entry because they are travelling so fast the friction of the atmosphere destroys them
This video is unreal! I've never seen such footage of a rocket. Great camera placement, what amazing shots as it ascended. This is a great example of the benefits of competition. ULA was tired of SpaceX getting such great publicity, in part due to their popular webcasts. Then ULA goes and does this! Competition raised the bar... excited to see how SpaceX responds.
Hello, Brian. No doubt the SpaceX publicity machine has forced ULA and other space companies to make changes in their TV and Internet coverage of launches. That said... please be aware that live, downward facing cameras have been used on U.S. rockets for well over twenty years now -- long before SpaceX even existed. More particularly, the venerable Delta II (the last one of which will be launched soon by ULA from Vandenberg) sported such coverage on a more than a dozen launches to visit comets, the Moon and Mars around the turn of the century -- which I happily remember watching on my TV as they took place. Here for fun are just two of these... czcams.com/video/eegx7XSVzOk/video.html (1999) czcams.com/video/wzXKeOn3R1I/video.html (2000) Stay with this fine video to the end to see spectacular views of Florida and an awesome shot of staging and second stage ignition) Also, of course, the last fifteen or so Shuttle launches featured a live cam mounted by NASA on the craft's external fuel tank which showed us all SRB burn out and separation. Additional cameras mounted on each SRB brought us back spectacular footage of these behemoths sparking, steaming and singing (!) as they successfully reentered the Earth's atmosphere for recovery in the ocean. Again, all of this is still available on CZcams. The only thing missing is the mob of millenials at Hawthorne wildly cheering each major milestone. The French are wise when they say, "Plus ca change, plus la meme chose." Cheers.
Im seeing the comments saying why not do live feed and what-not. More than likely its because Lockheed and Boeing are both stock market and investor incorporated. Unlike Spacex and Blue Origin which are privately funded. If ULA messes up they could catch bad press and investors might flee. So I think that may have something to do with it.
To all you geniuses claiming it's a fish-eye lens. Go back to the very start of the launch, as the rocket is clearing the launch gantry. There is absolutely no distortion in the periphery of the frame, all the straight objects are still very straight. This is NOT a fish-eye lens. And yes, the flight path goes from vertical to parallel. That's how we put things into orbit. Any other way would be stupid.
@@Stickman_Productions As with every other lens ever made, there are varying strengths of the lenses used in cameras. Most fish-eye lens claims are actually Wide-Angle lenses which are completely different. The one thing a lens cannot do, however, is take a flat horizon and make it spherical - not without distorting every other object in the frame.
I don't know what kind of lens it is, but you can clearly say that it is a fake curve if you keep tracking the size of the lake and clouds and comparing it with the appearing curvature starting from 1:10 to 2:02. Caught! 👌🏻
@@spinosaurusstriker I don't care. I can plainly see where the rocket came from. I want to see ahead of it. When you are riding in an automobile, do you sit facing backwards and if not, why not? If you get into an accident, you're much safer sitting facing the rear. Why can't they have cameras facing forward also? Are they too expensive?
I wish there were rockets one could skydive off of. Usually an ascent takes 10-30 minutes, depending on weather conditions, number of jumpers and the plane. This thing is up there after 30-40 seconds!
@@kennyreck those fairings are flying back to the earth at such intense speeds that the air is bending it like paper. you can even see at one point it starts to burn up on the inner part of the fairing. sure they make them very flexible so they dont explode into a bunch of shards and rip the rocket apart.
@@derpdawg420 Actually it's not the air, at that altitude it's almost nonexistent, which is why the fairings are jettisoned btw. What burned and twisted the fairings is the exhaust of the engine
@@derpdawg420 I think the flex is left over from whatever they use to eject them. The force to shove it away like that can't be particularly small, overcoming inertia at those speeds.
Don't worry dude he's a just a pawn, you can't know the truth if you're not willing to learn it, nuts fine he will keep thinking we are the dumb ones while he feasts on nasa lies all we can do is laugh at the misery
Your launches would be much more exciting if you showed us the live rocket cam footage during launch, not two weeks after. Come on ULA you can do it...
What difference would that make. Conspiratards will still play the 'fakery' card whether it is live, or not. It is what they did with the Falcon Heavy.
@@nebtheweb8885 Yeah, in 200 years they'll be living on Mars and still claiming the Earth is flat and everything outside the dome is just a simulation. You can't teach people who don't want to learn.
No, they really can't. A live feed would require an uninterrupted signal from rocket to ground, so they have to do it when the cameras arrive back on earth.
I think the thick bar that runs vertical is like a light burnout for the lens. All cameras that you and I use function the way we are familiar with when interacting with light that's been diffused by the atmosphere. The air spreads light in different directions. I think up there, well above the bulk of the atmosphere, the sunlight is stupid intense and the camera can capture the reflections off surfaces, but glitches out for the sun, since it's just too much.
Glare, essentially. There's too much light coming into the lense for the camera to process and resolve. They could filter the light, but that would reduce total light input and darken the rest of the image.
It does look as though the globe is bigger than we traditionally think. The curvature away, rather than from side to side, seems to be come obvious at far too great an altitude. Disturbing...
I just love how the sun looks like it's getting closer as they go higher above our FLAT BEAUTIFUL EARTH ❤❤ They try so hard to curve the horizon though it's changing shape 😅😅
Distant life forms are so advanced they live among us, not only through electricity, water, sound & light but mostly through the number P A hedgehog told me to say that
I am not one of those FE guys that looks down on normies like you . - It takes a certain kind of person to consider ideas outside of your comfort zone. FE is not for everyone. - The truth will come out one day . NASA know that . There is a mistake in this video that proves this is fake. I won`t point it out right now. I don`t want to see this video removed before everyone has got a chance to see it :) If you want to see some older examples . "1+ hour fake station fails" Or check a channel like "pottersclay"
@@decadent. "I am not one of those FE guys that looks down on normies like you" thanks for that, it was absolutely hilarious. Of course, you can't look down on us, because any change in elevation increases the risk you'll find out you live on a globe.
So every rocket launch we've ever seen goes up a and then levels off. So when did this one level off because it went straight up with it's Fish Eye Lens Camera that creates curvature
Yall don't have a fuckin clue how a fish eye lens works. If that was a fish eye lens, the rocket itself would be completely deformed, even the sun would look off
Not a flat head but couldn't help but notice that the clouds are skipping around like they've been purposefully edited later on in the video as they approach the atmosphere limit
الشمس دائرية وعندما تضي للاسفل تضي مساحتها فقط وعندما تصورون من الاعلى يظهر لكم فقط الجزء الذي تضيئه الشمس في الارض المسطحة . اي بمعنا لو كانت الشمس مربعه .كان عندما تطلعون وتصورون من الاعلى ستقولون انها مربعه واذا كانت الشمس مثلثه كنتم ستقولون ان الارض مثلثه . فلماذا لا يتم التصوير من الاعلى البعيد لكي نرى ايضا النجوم ترجموا لانني لااتكلم الانجليزيه شكرا دليل القران الكريم اكبر واثبت دليل لدينا بانها مسطحة
![Felix Baumgartner Space Jump World Record 2012 Full HD 1080p [FULL]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vvbN-cWe0A0/mqdefault.jpg)
This. This is what we want to see. On-board feeds. None of those stupid computer images, we want to see the actual video footage. Those cameras are worth every penny.
they probably dont even cost that much
There's literally dozens of feeds like this!
@@dangibbs5390 Kept private to the engineers. I'd love to have the ability to look at all the camera's. Even the tank cams are neat!
@Great White North Bear Rockets that achieve orbit must arc over because, in order to achieve orbit, one must develop a very large speed that is parallel to the surface of the earth. It is much, much more efficient to arc over and do a so-called "gravity turn" to get into orbit than it is to go straight up and then try to burn parallel to the ground at your highest point above it.
Plus, the fisheye effect on this camera/flight is rather negligible, especially towards the center of the frame. You can see the curvature of the earth without the effects of fisheye at 3:19 into the flight.
I'm personally unsure if you consider yourself a flat-earther. However, I wanted to post this as a response to state that the first is pretty much negligible towards the center of the frame and the second is vital for spacecraft to achieve orbit, which further defeats the concept of a flat earth.
Thats what i also wanted to see all along, not all the other junk
its cool to see how the rocket structure is deformed during the maximum aerodynamic pressure phase, its clearly visible on the 1ft stage wall (0:54 - 1:14 into flight it gets compressed).
Obviously the rocket needs the flexibility to withstand such forces...
WOW and WOW, I am so amazed to see that skin flexing like that, How did I miss that the first time around.
MAX Q, wow.
I think that's an illusion: It's not the booster skin deforming (fortunately, otherwise structural failure would be following prompt) but sublimation of frost on the skin of the LOX tank during MaxQ phase.
The structure (shape of the rocket) is static throughout the clip. wtf are you talking about? There is a layer of ice forming on the body of the rocket, that happens with planes too. It happens at 7-8000 feet above ground and higher, depending on local conditions.
@@jazzochannel exactly it happens on planes too because they fly at 700km/h and the ice cools down fast...
@@jazzochannel And no friction to see of the van Alan Belts...to penatrate does you need a hole lot bigger and more powerfull rocket than this baby. We never left our atmosphere. Even International spacecenter is not in vacuum space but still in our atmosphere. Just like the sun moon and stars
30 seconds to get above the clouds and less than 2 minutes to get into space..absolutely incredible
Is that sarcastic? My brain automatically reads everything sarcastically... im also questioning if it's real...for no reason other than trust issues... is that time soan believable to you? I mean i dont know...
Lol nevermind...it's obviously sarcastic
it's not real
@@nightbum775 reported you for harrasment
it is so incredible that this rocket made it to space in 2 min, it is almost like CGI movie magic.
Excellent video, thanks! 🚀🌍
Very nice. I like how you jump straight into business
Awesome vid. Thanks for sharing.
Absolutely amazing!
Super cool. Wow how much the fairing wobbled :D
Beautiful view!
I spend more time in a Drive-Thru than it takes for you to get a spacecraft in orbit.
🚀🌎👍
💯
Than*.
@@ashleynills7507 thanks Ash
@@taoistflyer welcome.
Damn 2 min and you are aready in space! Mindblow how fast these rockets go!
Still in orbit bud...can't get to space
That's not space, that is right above the clouds, thats why is was so quick to reach
@@frandemarco After 100km you cross the Karman Line so you are in space!
Ever play KSP?
Remember when the atmosphere was soupy and you couldnt fight the atmosphere?
@@frandemarco You are technically correct
orbit is tied
: P
It still has drag
There are 5 Atlas V’s (the First number is the diameter of the fairing, the second the amout of SRB’s, and the third the amout of second stage engine’s) you have the 411 & 511, the 421 & 521, the 431 & 531, the 541 and 551 plus know that there’s always Something assymetrical. Scott Manley has a great video of this BTW.
Nice but damn y’all should have showed all this on your live feed instead of just the second stage booster. But good we get to see it now 👊🏼
And yet there are people who still insist the earth is flat. God help us.
I'm not a flat earther or anything but you have to admit this video doesn't really prove the earth is a sphere...if anything it shows a dome. Again, I don't believe the earth is flat but after watching "Faking Space" and finding out that Nasa edits their photos of the earth from the moon for some odd reason I don't just believe whatever I'm told by people who won't let me see it with my own eyes anyway...
@@Antinational2A dôme? How do you see a “dome?” I thought you couldn’t get out because of the “dome” “firmament?”
Такое видео искал много лет. Спасибо!
A real classic rocket.
That planet doesn’t look flat to me
get your eyes checked
@@delayedcreator4783 get your head checked
Great work best feed ever.
Nice footage! I especially love seeing the solids separate
I can watch the solids seperate all day
when are we getting the full launch broadcast replay?
GOES-S was a NASA broadcast, so we don't host it on our channel. ULA-produced broadcasts are available via our channel.
...
Oh no no no, I'm a rocket cam
Rocket cam, burning out his fuse up here alone
...
Does Elton John know about this?
I wish there was a video like this but reaching the moon. I feel like it would be so damn incredible to be able to witness such a spectacle. From seeing Earth becoming a smaller and smaller marble. I hope one day we can see a video like this
trurocker03 you never will because the earth is flat and we can’t go and haven’t gone to the moon.
@@dreals4440 NASA is going back to the moon by 2024. And Earth is not flat, because it wouldn't make sense on so many levels
ExoGhost nasa cannot go to the moon, no one can, no one has ever been, did you know China ‘went to the moon’ in 2013? Lool no of course you didn’t, the media didn’t even cover it because it was so fake lool🤣 it will be another faked moon landing filmed somewhere in Hollywood, just better graphics, hope they don’t leave the camera guy behind this time🤣🤣🤣
There are plenty of videos showing Apollo Missions filmed from the inside of the space crafts... I'll look for it and give you the link.
D REALS Aren’t you the kind of guy that believes the moon is much smaller and closer to earth since the earth is flat and the moon is under the dome or whatever? If the moon was smaller and closer, why haven’t we been able to go there? Wouldn’t it be easier to go there if it is closer?
Very beautiful
Awesome!!!
So cool!!!
THIS video is Flat-Earthers worst nightmare!
MUAHAHAHAHARRGGHH!!!
Looks closely final separation. All Particles seem to slow down as if under a thick medium. It's not space.
As a science realist I have to say LOL !!!!!
There is a mistake in this video that proves this is fake.
I won`t point it out right now.
I don`t want to see this video removed before everyone has got a chance to see it :)
If you want to see some older examples . "1+ hour fake station fails"
@@decadent. "I won`t point it out right now." I bet you won't point it out at all! XD
@@decadent. Having said that, I KNOW about the FAKE space station footages. But it doesn't mean the world is flat!
It dosent show a round earth
Oh look at that, the horizon doesn't go on forever... it's almost as if... it's like... the horizon is just the edge of something round...
Sad clown smh dummy go learn wtf the horizon is you sound incredibly stupid
Yet every other independent helium balloon does show a completely flat plane... You trust the organization to show you the "truth?
Those side rockets that got disconnected? Where do those land? And how?
They either land in the sea or the desert, or they burn up in re-entry because they are travelling so fast the friction of the atmosphere destroys them
Amazing
Bravo !!
What s day does the launcher?
Que dia foi este lançamento?
This video is unreal! I've never seen such footage of a rocket. Great camera placement, what amazing shots as it ascended. This is a great example of the benefits of competition. ULA was tired of SpaceX getting such great publicity, in part due to their popular webcasts. Then ULA goes and does this! Competition raised the bar... excited to see how SpaceX responds.
Fair point. I am just very happy to see actual video as opposed to the old computer animations that have dominated launch videos for years.
Hello, Brian. No doubt the SpaceX publicity machine has forced ULA and other space companies to make changes in their TV and Internet coverage of launches. That said... please be aware that live, downward facing cameras have been used on U.S. rockets for well over twenty years now -- long before SpaceX even existed. More particularly, the venerable Delta II (the last one of which will be launched soon by ULA from Vandenberg) sported such coverage on a more than a dozen launches to visit comets, the Moon and Mars around the turn of the century -- which I happily remember watching on my TV as they took place. Here for fun are just two of these...
czcams.com/video/eegx7XSVzOk/video.html (1999)
czcams.com/video/wzXKeOn3R1I/video.html (2000)
Stay with this fine video to the end to see spectacular views of Florida and an awesome shot of staging and second stage ignition)
Also, of course, the last fifteen or so Shuttle launches featured a live cam mounted by NASA on the craft's external fuel tank which showed us all SRB burn out and separation. Additional cameras mounted on each SRB brought us back spectacular footage of these behemoths sparking, steaming and singing (!) as they successfully reentered the Earth's atmosphere for recovery in the ocean. Again, all of this is still available on CZcams. The only thing missing is the mob of millenials at Hawthorne wildly cheering each major milestone.
The French are wise when they say, "Plus ca change, plus la meme chose."
Cheers.
Oops. Here's the 1999 video WITH SOUND -- and in HD too ! Much betta !!
czcams.com/video/zyq5eN9C4Cc/video.html (1999)
rapid total re-usability
Im seeing the comments saying why not do live feed and what-not. More than likely its because Lockheed and Boeing are both stock market and investor incorporated. Unlike Spacex and Blue Origin which are privately funded. If ULA messes up they could catch bad press and investors might flee. So I think that may have something to do with it.
I'm pretty sure if any rocket goes wrong everyone's gonna know about it, onboard feed or not.
but ULA has live casts for all of their launches...
To all you geniuses claiming it's a fish-eye lens.
Go back to the very start of the launch, as the rocket is clearing the launch gantry. There is absolutely no distortion in the periphery of the frame, all the straight objects are still very straight. This is NOT a fish-eye lens.
And yes, the flight path goes from vertical to parallel. That's how we put things into orbit. Any other way would be stupid.
It is slightly wide angle lens, but not fisheye
Plus at all the time frames where they claim fish eye, I cant see any warping or distortion in the image of the rocket, which is in the same shot.
People say every camera in space is fish eye.
Also I don't know much about fish eyes but wouldn't they distort the rocket a little bit too?
@@Stickman_Productions As with every other lens ever made, there are varying strengths of the lenses used in cameras. Most fish-eye lens claims are actually Wide-Angle lenses which are completely different.
The one thing a lens cannot do, however, is take a flat horizon and make it spherical - not without distorting every other object in the frame.
I don't know what kind of lens it is, but you can clearly say that it is a fake curve if you keep tracking the size of the lake and clouds and comparing it with the appearing curvature starting from 1:10 to 2:02. Caught! 👌🏻
That's absolutely fkn amazing
Nice.
What was that motorcycle sound
Are there any video of the camera facing forward and not just backwards?
No, they haven't figured out how to fake that angle yet.
@@SunnedeyzRecordings I believe that, because I want to see it go up into space, not leaving the ground.
@@SunnedeyzRecordings facts lol
Do you guys think these launches are like , covered to the public or something? you all can see it leve ground live .
@@spinosaurusstriker I don't care. I can plainly see where the rocket came from. I want to see ahead of it. When you are riding in an automobile, do you sit facing backwards and if not, why not? If you get into an accident, you're much safer sitting facing the rear. Why can't they have cameras facing forward also? Are they too expensive?
What i really wanna know.. what the hell are those particles floating around?
Ice, usually. The rocket is fueled with liquid oxygen which is very cold. Ice forms on outside and shakes off during launch.
U can see it literally start to fall off the earth into orbit. Dope.
why this rocket is not spinning while its launching
Does anyone know what kind of camera and its specs? It doesn't look like a fisheye picture to me.
NO لاء
Cruising altitude of the SR-71 Blackbird.
Okay, so can someone please tell me if that is the sun in that picture that's so bright?
Most likely.
Yes, that's the sun. It appears white in space because the atmosphere isn't there to distort th color.
Which Disney studio was this made in
I wish there were rockets one could skydive off of. Usually an ascent takes 10-30 minutes, depending on weather conditions, number of jumpers and the plane. This thing is up there after 30-40 seconds!
It was a timplapse
It's not a time-lapse, you get to orbit in minutes.
Like the red bull jump. I don't think they want lawsuits lol
What are "those", which are dropping.
That planet
This was dope.. At least these launchers feel more like theyre on our side instead of the goverments of the world
Why was it going up there? What was it doing?
Probably satellite deployment.
Cool
3:28 Those wobbly fairings deploying though.
Alexandre Fyne I saw something similar while watching an Ariane 5 launch.
Is that supposed to be wobbly like that or do you think something else is going on here cause I was trying to figure that one out
@@kennyreck those fairings are flying back to the earth at such intense speeds that the air is bending it like paper. you can even see at one point it starts to burn up on the inner part of the fairing. sure they make them very flexible so they dont explode into a bunch of shards and rip the rocket apart.
@@derpdawg420 Actually it's not the air, at that altitude it's almost nonexistent, which is why the fairings are jettisoned btw. What burned and twisted the fairings is the exhaust of the engine
@@derpdawg420 I think the flex is left over from whatever they use to eject them. The force to shove it away like that can't be particularly small, overcoming inertia at those speeds.
The moon is still so far
Показалось, что в дождь запустили, потом понял, откуда столько жидкости.)
Cool.
I'm here to read the woken up who spotted glitches.
*rolls eyes*
woken as a deaf bat in a spider web.
Flat Earther launches a balloon
Flat Earther: See Earth is flat
Real engineer launches a rocket
Flat Earther: see that's cgi
Tokeson you are brain dead mate.
@@aurumtree 🤣🤣🤣
I'm not sure who's more brain dead, considering your ego without any research
Don't worry dude he's a just a pawn, you can't know the truth if you're not willing to learn it, nuts fine he will keep thinking we are the dumb ones while he feasts on nasa lies all we can do is laugh at the misery
More like Atlas-V goes brrrrrrrr
wowwww the earth
@@steelsurfercore5642 it went into orbit that's why it turned horizontal
this should end the flat earth debate once and for all lmfaooo
I used it to cancel a flat earther. I’m going to do it again.
They won't look at or ask any questions that would expose the flat earth movement. Have you noticed that with them?
There is no debate.
At 4:45 the RL-10 seems to spring a leak through the nozzle manifold(not the roll exhaust). Any ideas or knowledge anyone?
Your launches would be much more exciting if you showed us the live rocket cam footage during launch, not two weeks after. Come on ULA you can do it...
What difference would that make. Conspiratards will still play the 'fakery' card whether it is live, or not. It is what they did with the Falcon Heavy.
@@nebtheweb8885 Yeah, in 200 years they'll be living on Mars and still claiming the Earth is flat and everything outside the dome is just a simulation.
You can't teach people who don't want to learn.
No, they really can't. A live feed would require an uninterrupted signal from rocket to ground, so they have to do it when the cameras arrive back on earth.
Faantástic
curious but weird. y can u see a sun spot on earth. it's the sun's reflection real close. I dont get that. that is weird to me check it out
What is the line crossing the sun?
I think the thick bar that runs vertical is like a light burnout for the lens. All cameras that you and I use function the way we are familiar with when interacting with light that's been diffused by the atmosphere. The air spreads light in different directions. I think up there, well above the bulk of the atmosphere, the sunlight is stupid intense and the camera can capture the reflections off surfaces, but glitches out for the sun, since it's just too much.
Glare, essentially. There's too much light coming into the lense for the camera to process and resolve. They could filter the light, but that would reduce total light input and darken the rest of the image.
Bad gci
ULA ULA ULA ULA ULA
ULA
How did camera guy survive?
Holding onto a rope and has a winter jacket for the cold
@@mactallica9293 wow, the guy is real professional. Respect
Hes the camera man
Just look at 1:20 something light shows up on the top left corner, idk what it is 🤔
Ice crystals
lightning
Ufo
I would guess Ice crystals as well. There is a lot of condensation, some of it frozen, when you fill a big tank with liquid oxygen.
Flat earthers “NUH UH!!”
Imagine forgoting to turn on the camera
why am i thinking of the space core from Portal 2
SPAAAAAAAAAAAAACEEEEE
Space Space go to space
Space orbit space space
Play it cool, space cops help me space cops space cops help
അന്റാർട്ടിക്ക യിലേക്ക് ആണോ
poikuyresdweqasxzsa ploty?
Sun is near
Why don't they tell us where this launched from? Why do smaller rockets appear to be going much faster and get to elevation quicker?
3:28 FLAT
Fish eye lens bro. It's reverse curve lol earth confirm donut shape 😂
I wonder if the range commentator has ever had a slip of the tongue and said "SOB" instead of "SRB"?
LoL just love your fisheye camera lens. How much longer can you keep up this hoax?
not a fisheye, fisheyes would also distort the rocket around the lense which it did not do here.
Why is there a pole under the sun..?
Lens flare.
Is it moon or sun in back
That's the Sun
Yeah the moon doesn't emit light, it reflects light from the sun like a space mirror.
Hopefully now I can shut flat earthers up
You'd hope so, but... experience tells me otherwise.
Lol y’all believe in thses fake nasa videos is hilarious
I see curvature but I also see level ground.
It does look as though the globe is bigger than we traditionally think. The curvature away, rather than from side to side, seems to be come obvious at far too great an altitude. Disturbing...
I dont know how to use my phone😂
Is that trash in space?
فديو مركب حاسوبي الاقرب انه بلاستيشن ٤
fonte?
I just love how the sun looks like it's getting closer as they go higher above our FLAT BEAUTIFUL EARTH ❤❤
They try so hard to curve the horizon though it's changing shape 😅😅
That's why education is important for you stone ager
vim pelo sistemático
Idem
Distant life forms are so advanced they live among us, not only through electricity, water, sound & light but mostly through the number P
A hedgehog told me to say that
Gee , the sun sure does not look 93 million miles away !!!! Now all they gotta do next time is mm as ke te video without a fish eye lens
How do flat earthers explain this video?
I am not one of those FE guys that looks down on normies like you .
- It takes a certain kind of person to consider ideas outside of your comfort zone. FE is not for everyone.
- The truth will come out one day . NASA know that .
There is a mistake in this video that proves this is fake.
I won`t point it out right now.
I don`t want to see this video removed before everyone has got a chance to see it :)
If you want to see some older examples . "1+ hour fake station fails" Or check a channel like "pottersclay"
Scream about fish eye lenses, pools of water, and CGI. Anything they can think to deny the facts and maintain their world view.
@@decadent. "I am not one of those FE guys that looks down on normies like you" thanks for that, it was absolutely hilarious. Of course, you can't look down on us, because any change in elevation increases the risk you'll find out you live on a globe.
no flat!
are they in the water? from 7:03 to 7:30 , is that bubble:?
It’s ice
No, they're in space. Those are ice crystals that have shaken loose from the rocket.
So every rocket launch we've ever seen goes up a and then levels off. So when did this one level off because it went straight up with it's Fish Eye Lens Camera that creates curvature
There's no fish eye because you would see the earth in the background warp between concave and convex which doesn't happen.
Yall don't have a fuckin clue how a fish eye lens works. If that was a fish eye lens, the rocket itself would be completely deformed, even the sun would look off
Yeah when the smoke (msybe its rcs)starts going you can see that the smoke isn't distorted, so it can't be fisheye
Not a flat head but couldn't help but notice that the clouds are skipping around like they've been purposefully edited later on in the video as they approach the atmosphere limit
Adam Sizemore huh? At what time in the video?
What about that hotspot on the Earth? That shouldn’t be…
Look so real like a hollywood movie
Seems too bee a fair bitt of smal debrie half way in on the video. Cool video!
Hundreds of thousands of pieces of debris up there, unfortunately.
الشمس دائرية وعندما تضي للاسفل تضي مساحتها فقط
وعندما تصورون من الاعلى يظهر لكم فقط الجزء الذي تضيئه الشمس في الارض المسطحة .
اي بمعنا لو كانت الشمس مربعه .كان عندما تطلعون وتصورون من الاعلى ستقولون انها مربعه
واذا كانت الشمس مثلثه كنتم ستقولون ان الارض مثلثه .
فلماذا لا يتم التصوير من الاعلى البعيد لكي نرى ايضا النجوم
ترجموا لانني لااتكلم الانجليزيه شكرا
دليل القران الكريم اكبر واثبت دليل لدينا بانها مسطحة
تعال ، إنها حقيقة ثابتة أن الأرض كروية.
A random guy with a rocket > NASA
Im pretty sure this is a NASA rocket...
The earth is flat!!!! XD XD XD XD