Algebra 2 Regents January 2024 (Part 1 Questions 1 - 24)
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 04. 2024
- In this video I go through the Algebra 2 Regents January 2024, part 1, questions 1-24.
Here is a link to the practice exam:
www.nysedregents.org/algebrat...
If you have any specific topics you want me to cover, let me know in the COMMENT section. Thanks for watching!
My regents exam is tomorrow 😭 I’m watching this to refresh my brain
on gosh
I've been studying, but I'm still a bit nervous that the questions might defile my brain.
me too im crying
Bruh good luck me too. I know NOTHING
@@lebronaughI know nothing too, hoping to pass by the grace of god
The regents is in a couple of weeks I hope everyone passes with a 85 and above! Including me
I'm rooting for you all!!
Taking the regents in 9 hrs wish me luck 🥰
Good luck! How did the test go?!
I WILL remember the equation a = 1/4p instead of going through this pain and hell you’ve shown me at 29:33 - 32:40 💀 you weren’t lying, it’s an exhausting process and really time consuming too 😅
Life saver. Not starting the test quite yet, but this is definitely helping for review.
I will do a livestream to review the night before the A2 regents!
Which topic(s) from A2 were most challenging?
@@vinteachesmath I’ve had the most trouble with word problems, specifically like Q24 here. And Q12 too.
@@vinteachesmath parabolas, focus, diretrix, ans all thos formulas
Good luck y’all
I hope the test went well!
You’re so helpful thank you!!!
I am happy to help! I hope your studying is going well!
Good luck!
How did it go?!
For question 10, 35:38, how did you know to change the square root of 2 into 2^1/2? I know it’s an easier way, but how did you know to change it into that?
Do you know what the name of the lesson is for questions like the last one, question 24?
1:18:16 i dont understand why -7 isnt extraneous? i get an error in my calculator for that one.
If you plug it back into the original equation, before the cancellations, x = -7 would lead to division by 0 which is not possible.
-7 isn’t an extraneous solution because it isn’t a solution at all. I made the same mistake too 😅
hello! I am a little confused on question 23. If you calculate the answer out, you get a negative number (1-1.0015 in the denominatior). Why would this be if all she does is add to her account?
Here is a video solution to your question: czcams.com/video/sq4ayQC4R_8/video.html
I would try to go through as many proofs of math formulas as possible. When you go through the proof, you understand the ins and outs of the equation.
@@vinteachesmath thank you so much, I didnt realize that the negative in the numerator and denominator would cancel out, getting a positive. Thank you for clearing this up for me.
Sorry one more thing- We know that a geometric sequence with 0.15% would have a rate of 1.0015. What about for exponential growth (P=A(r+1)^t)? If a bank increases by 20% a year, would (r+1)^t be (1+0.2)^t or (1+1.2)^t? Sorry for all the questions 😅
Hi I don’t know If you check comments but I followed what you did at 52:48 and my calculator keeps saying error data type any help?
You could try resetting the calculator, press 2nd, +, 7, 1, 2... Otherwise, maybe you used a subtraction sign for the negative? That is a common mistake.
Some people mentioned that the board were going to start something different with these kind of test, do you know anything about that?
A1 is switching over to next generation standards. A2 is going to switch for the 2025-2026 school year.
@@vinteachesmath so does this mean the regent won't be require for these students, not that I want that to happen but is it really the case?
@@fuzzyblox5746 I think they’re making them optional, but it might not happen in our high school time
For #15, how is 325 not the initial temperature when put into the oven?
The equation is the initial temperature and e to the power of -0.4t is the part that shows how much the temperature increases by each hour
@@dragonsgamer2607 thank you!!
Do you have Part 2 Posted?
I will finish recording it today! I will edit and upload it by Tuesday/Wednesday!
Awesome, thanks!
For #24, why did you multiply 12t by 1/12? Also I really appreciate the vids, and because of you I got a 100 on my geometry regents last year!
Your reviews include way too much concepts, rules and theorems that no sane student would bother learning. They only seem to confuse me further to the point of frustration. I wonder if anyone else experiences this.
Thank you for the feedback; I appreciate you taking the time to write this.
Would you prefer reviews that are unit based so you can focus on less topics? Or do you prefer I take the test in real time and spend less time explaining the ins and outs?
I put these videos together because the regents is a comprehensive test. Students usually watch these videos at the end of the year after they've seen every topic
Maybe it's time to start paying attention in class. These are in no way meant to be a substitute for the class. 😂
@@EM88005 not to be pretentious, but I score low to mid 90s in all my classes. I can be quite lazy at times but I’m not a slack-off in class. And I’ve seen comments like mine on other videos of his as well.
@@vinteachesmath I am aware that my own unpopular opinion on your content is in no way a reason for me to demand you to change your reviews. However, Many students like myself solve problems like logarithm form with “simple” methods like DAN DNA (easy acronym to remember how to put your answer from exponent to logarithmic form). Your current reviews of entire regents exams at once work well, but for me (not speaking for anyone else), they can hard to follow. I’ll try to look at your other videos to better articulate myself sometime soon, but I now have a chem regents to study for :).
@@monkemilitia what is dan dna