Swarovski Z6i 1-6x24 4-I vs Vortex Razor HD Gen II 1-6x24 JM-1
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 09. 2024
- Swarovski Z6i 1-6x24 4-I vs Vortex Razor HD Gen II 1-6x24 JM-1 review
Skip to reticle and scope view: 7:30
Skip to 1 minute conclusion: 10:14
We have a battle of the titans. Comparing the Swarovski Z6i 1-6
with the Vortex Razor 1-6. Both are the 2nd generation of their respective models and absolutely outstanding low power variable optics. Both have amazing illumination and 30mm tubes.
Out of all the LVPOs on the market today, these are two of the best without question.
Here I explain the differences and why I think the Swarovski Z6i 1-6x scope is the best low power variable optic on the market today.
when you want red dot performance with on demand magnification thats not clunky and heavy.
dude i just picked up the razor on a pre black friday deal for $599. im beside myself. i can only assume somethingnew is in the close future but its a great deal for it. i love it.( coming from a strike eagle)
The older 25oz versions are being heavily discounted since the lightened version has been released.
For $600 though the performance you are getting is phenomenal.
That's amazing.. yes, it's because of the lighter version. Although weight isn't a big deal to a lot of people so you made out awesome, congrats.
Where did you buy it ?
thats fucked up. For the Old and new one i pay in germany 1600€...
vegeta420z That link you posted is for the Viper not Razor. The Razor is a higher end model than the Viper.
great job. good info.
im rocking my PA standard SFP 1-8x ACSS on my go-to FN 16" M4/RECCE and LOVE it! Its a great scope but not quite on the level of these two.
I also have the PA platinum FFP 1-8x ACSS aboard my DD5V1 .308 battlerifle and LOVE it too. It IS on the level of these two imo.
Its heavy but its flat out amazing in all respects plus it has the incompareable ACSS reticle which is hands down the best BDC/ranging reticle in the industry.
LPVOs are definetely the way to go.
PA platinum 1-8 is a BEAST. Good choice.
Do you still have the Z6i? Just curious. If not what did you sell it to get. The weight and glass clarity is what is still drawing me to it.
I agree with you. 10 oz and better everything. I have both and decided to sell the vortex.
Thanks for the video! Have you gotten a chance to compare the Z6i with the Kahles K16i? I've read that they're almost identical, but am trying to decide between them
Of course they dont really compare since the vortex is basically a combat optic and the swaro is a hunting optic. The swaro is going to be light and luxurious with brilliant glass. The vortex you could probably use as a hammer and it would only sustain damage to the finish, probably would even hold zero.
If only Vortex made their scopes with a rail mount option.. that would be game changer.
much better setup than red dot plus magnifer
Why is there a sticker in your scope?
Is this the new “E” model for the razor or the original?
The only difference between the E and the original is the weight. The E weighs a little over 21oz, the original a little over 25oz.
Other than that they're identical
Maximus Joseppi yea i know feature/optics wise they are the same. your comment in your video comparing weight led me to ask which razor model it was based on.
@@waldobirch oh, gotcha! This is the 25.6oz model. The z6i weighs 15.5oz. the E is like 21.5ish.
I've found the reduced weight on my scar 17 made it so much more wieldable. Those oz make a big difference on that high axis.
Maximus Joseppi ok thanks!
Why wouldn't you max out both brightness settings, are you afraid you'll brake it or something???
They get brighter than you need them to... There's no reason to ever max out the brightness setting on these scopes, you'll just get a worse sight picture.
I ve got a Swar Z8i 1-8x recently. I m disappointed because it has chromatic aberration control issue especially at 8x power...dude, does your Z6i has CA control problem at 6x? like image looks purple in someway?
Not at all, crystal clear.. maybe there's something wrong with it?
@@maximusjoseppi5904 facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10216469261593357&set=pcb.10216469262073369&type=3&theater this is what it looks like at 8X, does yours look like this? if not, I m gonna send this back to Swar
@@maximusjoseppi5904 clarity is okay, but the image at 8X give me a little bit of purple shadows
@@MrZhaokuo1225 that's not clear then 😉 clarity also entails no color distortion. I'd send it back and have it fixed
@@maximusjoseppi5904 bro, you can also see that distortion from my picture, right? just want to make sure people can see it not me being crazy. contact them first thing in the morning
Torture test !!
Have you seen the minox zp8 1-8×24mm mr10+ reticle? Smokes both of them
Way too heavy.. it weighs 9oz more than the z6i and 3oz more than the razor. 24.6oz, thing is a lead brick man haha.
Maybe if you bench rest at the range all day tacking paper but in classes, we run around with these things and even my 15oz z6i can be annoying during manipulations.
I don't care for 1-8s in general.. I don't get any benefit for the weight increase. The Swarovski Z8i weighs 18oz though if your heart is set on 8x.. that 6oz weight loss is a world of a difference.
3oz is nothing. I guess if your smaller framed then maybe. Well worth the performance in my opinion plus much better glass. Good glass ain't light.
@@hamedizzy6441 haha, 3oz is a lot, it's 15% more weight. If you don't think it's a lot, you don't run around with and do manipulations with your guns. I'm a 6'3 200lb bodybuilder. Your stature doesn't effect the horrible physics you create by putting a heavy optic on the highest axis of the rifle.
Good glass IS very light, the z8i is 18oz haha.. which is almost a half lb lighter. That's a huge difference.
Well I have 25% more weight on you and I've been working out for 20 years and I agree lighter is better but I'm also a glass snob couldnt settle man. Swaro makes good binos. Dont care for their scopes
I have mine on an 18.6" barreled rifle it's not a light weight running around corners rifle. Makes a difference what you're using it for. If you're only shooting inside 100-200 yards I'd just get a red dot n call it a day. Lol.
Jeez. That Swarovski is a foot long. I’m out.
aesthetics. wow lol
@@georgerafa5041 you can’t tell me that thing doesn’t look stupid as shit. For the money get a NF ATACR 1-8. Still smaller.
@@chewbacca5008 The Swarovski is mostly built for driven or dangerous game hunting rifles (as is evident also by the available reticle choice, or the lack thereof). And that entails a lot of magnum or break actions for rather absurdly long calibers like .450 Rigby), where the Vortex would be just too short to bridge the gap to mount correctly. Hunters sometimes need that extra length and definitely prefer less weight over less length.
www.ph-rifles.com/_files/200000542-d73fad839e/1_kl-56.jpg
fanzoj.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ivory-hunter-01-uai-1080x1080.jpg
images.gunsinternational.com/listings_sub/acc_2808/gi_100932774/CHAPUIS-30-06-QD-LEVER-PIVOT-MOUNTS-SWAROVSKI-1-6x24-ILLUMINATED-DOT-8-Lbs-13-Oz-and-10-Lbs-3-Oz-WIT_100932774_2808_318ADF81E7E46A04.jpg
On a .223 it can look and sometimes (depending on mount) be ridiculously long indeed. Your suggestion of an ATACR 1-8 definitely would be a better choice on a small caliber semi-auto for tactical applications.
But if you want to have a really unique toy (and don't mid a little bit of length over the Vortex) go for Swarovskis current best driven hunt offering: the Z8i 0.75-6x20.
A rather peculiar scope that goes beyond 1x to give you a unique wide angel view with absurd levels of unobstructed view. At 0.75 it kind of feels like an edgeless heads-up red-dot.
@@AntonGudenus Have you seen the 0.75-6x yourself? I'm interested in getting one but there's not a lot of feedback online. Is the 0.75x setting closer to looking like a red dot than the 1x on a z6i?
@@shootinbruin3614 I have looked trough it a few times in stores and mounted on friends rifles. But unfortunately have not tested it extensively yet, as due to covid my last two hunting seasons where devoid of much driven hunting and so the need to buy/test myself a new scope for them was non-existent.
But with the limited experience I have with it, I felt that the "below 1 magnification" makes it feel like you can look through the border of the scope if you get used to it. As the inner picture covers all that would otherwise be obstructed by the scope barrel. So in a way, I preferred it to a red-dot. (But mind you, I tried it on rifles that offered very repeatable cheekweld, so I didn't test how effectively it tolerates parallax )
What can cause a slightly weird feeling though is the slightly "slowed down" motion of the picture (relative to the surrounding picture) in the scope at 0,75x when swinging the rifle. Though, at least for me, that only took a few swings to get used to.
I shall write again, if I have any more testing experience.