What does "impedance matching" actually look like? (electricity waves)
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 12. 2023
- In this follow-up to my electricity waves video over on the main channel ( / @alphaphoenixchannel , I'm talking about impedance matching. This video is a bit more technical than the main channel video and I'd recommend brushing up on how resistive dividers work before we abstract resistive dividers into a soup of fake imaginary resistors in the second half of this video!
Special thanks to my top Patreon supporters!
birdiesnbritts
John Sosa Trustham
Vladimir Shklovsky
Aloysius Sparglepartz
Ryan M
Jason Whatley
Lohann Paterno Coutinho Ferreira
Kasper Nielsen
Jeffrey Mckishen
/ alphaphoenix
Media Credits: I Dunno by grapes is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (creativecommons.org/licenses/...) ccmixter.org/files/grapes/16626
You can also view terminating resistor as substitute for the rest of infinite wire. This way it's easier to understand why there is no reflected wave in this case
fantastic way to phrase it! it looks like the wire goes on forever
@@AlphaPhoenix2 The Design of CMOS Radio-Frequency Integrated Circuits has a very amusing chapter on transmission lines containing the gem:
> We've just seen that an infinite ladder network of infinitesimally small inductors and capacitors has a purely real input impedance over an infinite bandwidth. Although structures that are infinitely long are somewhat inconvenient to realize, we can always terminate a finite length of line in its characteristic impedance. Energy, being relatively easy to fool, cannot distinguish between real transmission line and a resistor equal to the characteristic impedance.
@@kilovoltamp Sounds like an interesting read. I'll have to check it out thank you
@@kilovoltamp That quote sounds like a mash up of Turbo Encabulator and The Missile Knows Where It Is
@@kilovoltampthe line "energy, being relatively easy to fool" sounds like someone is going to get a good zap ⚡
As an RF Engineer, I live by this principle. It was really cool to see you approach it from the DC perspective and I am very impressed by your painstaking oscilloscope measurements!!! I have only ever seen plots like this in simulations, never with true measurements.
25 years ago I learned all this at university. But the depth of insight you've added to that basic knowledge is a revelation.
Incredible work here
I learned the same thing, but 20 years ago...
Anyway what buggs me about the original verstasium post was the original claim that EE didnt learn this.
And.. well we bety much do. Impedance matchning is like the core of high frequency circit design. Really with out it most modern radio systems would not work at all, like a wifi circut
@@matsv201yeah, once you get into the Mhz you start to realise that everything is a capacitor and an inductor
@@Jefferson-ly5qe yea,, i don´t know exactly where the cut of is, we did basically all the labs in 2.5 and 5.1Ghz and then when i worked with it it was basically minimum 800Mhz ...
Ironically no i work with transport system and the highest frequency we use is 400Hz (note, Hz, not kHz or MHz), typically 8000V and around 1000A.
The people that did the system in the 1970 basically just made a gigantic coaxial cable and bent it to form. This turned out to be incredibly expensive. Of cause we talk about 100 of km of cable, so that is millions and millions.
Some of the AC we could simply eliminate but some of it need to be around, So we basically try to balanced stamped metal sheets. Resistance of the old system was also a bit to high.
Makes it a bit more complicated by the load of the vehicle change the induction.
Still its not really that complicated compare to like a 4G muti frequency base station that i worked with prior. its really just a different kind of complication because everything is huge.
this is not deep inside. It is an explanation made by a man that simply doen’t have enough technical skills (Ohm’s law , resistance definition for example)
The fact that more or less consumer grade scopes can actually capture this is utterly brilliant. And then all the graph visualisations, especially the one with the 8 or so different resistance levels and see how impedance matching magically works... very very cool! And fairly important with everything with antenna's, especially high powered ones that will reflect significantly if not correctly matched, blowing up amplifiers in the process.
All hail the Standing Wave Ratio meter & the 50 Ohm dummy load.
I never expected to see hard data showing these waves of electrons as clearly as the sea reflecting waves from a harbour wall.
This has to be one of the most revelatory data sets I've ever come across.
Dat here in appreciative, slight stunned silence as things I've used in RF & audio all fall into place!
Coming from the days where we would have to allow the scope to warm up for an hour before use, seeing the phrase "consumer grade scopes" blows my mind. But yeah, I guess that's where we are at. :)
I picked up a NanoVNA, and it's been really helpful tuning antennas. Generator and scope in one device!
@@trevorus I have one as well. I bought it for a project that I was working on a couple of years ago. Supposedly it can be modded to do light duty as a spectrum analyzer.
@@MrWaalkman
To have an idea of where the 150 ohm characteristic impedance of the cable is coming from, you can think of the wire having some inductivity and that there is some capacitance between the two twisted wires in the cable. If you would compute the series inductance and parallel capacitance, the resulting impedance would be 150 ohm. Of course, when modeling this, you would split the cable into an infinite number of sections and each section would have its inductance and capacitance resulting in the characteristic impedance of 150 ohms. You can thing of the wave propagation as the transfer of energy between those inductors and capacitors in the infinitesimal segments, each having a 150 ohm characteristic impedance. This also helps to think what happens when the wave leaves the last segment of the wire and hits a short or open.
To understand that, I would have to know what inductivity and capacitance was but yes, it kind of makes sense. I'm still not sure how you can measure both impedence and resistance in Ohms. If they have the same units, shouldn't they be the same quantity? I guess this is like how "power consumption" is measured in "Watt-hours" and "energy" is measured in "Joules"?
@@aspuzling You would measure them in Henry (Ohm * sec) for the inductance and Farad ( C / V ) ...I hope I still remember correctly, for the capacitance. (where C is Coulomb and V is volt)
@@aspuzling So both resistance and impedance are the same ‘thing’, except that resistance in DC is a special case. The formulas for impedance of capacitors and inductors are complex (as in have a real and imaginary part) that depend on frequency, and at DC what happens is that the impedance of an inductor goes to zero and the impedance of the capacitor goes to infinity (which is the same as an open circuit), so once it reaches that steady DC state you can basically assume that both the inductance and the capacitance that is inherent in the wires doesn’t exist anymore, and all you see left over is the resistance. So impedance is the same thing, but the dynamic nature of the signal (in the case in the video it’s a transient, the voltage changing in a ‘step’ from zero up to the voltage of the battery when it’s switched on) is bringing out extra elements that you just can’t see at DC.
@DrenImeraj And the consequence of this is that the "width" of the traveling step-pulse wave front imposes a limit on the practical bandwidth of the wire?
The wire also has Reactance ie its "resistance" to the flow of AC current as in AC the magnetic field is rising and falling all the time affecting the flow of the electrons.
This doesn't just apply to long wire transmission lines. Changes in impedance on PCB traces or lines connected to them creates reflections and that's generally where noise comes from. Robert Feranec has a bunch of videos talking to a signal integrity expert, Eric Bogatin, and he basically explains everything you did in these videos but in the context of PCB design.
Rick Hartley did a similar thing on Altium's channel. Video name "How to Achieve Proper Grounding - Rick Hartley" He ranked EMI issues above signal integrity. He explains it better than i do.
@@kazuviking I try and overclock SPI on an atsame51 chip so I can push frames to a ~115KB SPI display as fast as possible. I think the limit is supposed to be 18MHz according to the datasheet. If I add 33 ohm series resistors on the cheapest china 2 layer boards I can manage to get 24MHz before things get corrupted. That's just the first value I tested, on I think a 12 mil trace. It would be nice to go faster, and maybe even pass EMI testing even though I'll never sell anything, but I have no idea how I'd even begin to figure the characteristics of the out of spec peripheral.
I'm going to have to check out this videos, thanks dudes!
PCB traces are still modeled as transmission lines they just have a different geometry. PCB tend to be a strip, microstrip, and coplanar
*TEM transmission lines*
Coaxial line
Two-wire line
Parallel plate line
Strip line
Microstrip line
Coplanar waveguide
*high-order transmission lines*
Rectangular waveguide
optical fiber
I don't often write comments, but WOW this was awesome. This, combined with the last video somehow got me to see an intense beauty in this "low-level", more advanced type of electrical properties. Thank you so much for this
You said exactly what I was going to say. Incredible work!!
If you use the electron motion visualization again in future, adding colour based on speed may make it a easier to see the changes in velocity, so blue is slow, red is fast, and rainbow or gradient between.
Also, this video should be required watching for every EE student, it explains and shows impendance 10x better than anything I got in school.
Totally
It was really interesting to see the dynamical demonstrations of pulses propagating and hitting the different loads! I didn't expect the real world waveforms to be so close to the ones you see in textbooks. Bravo to you!
Ow, you are here too) xD
Ахах) да, привет
The link to the main channel in the video description leads to an error page, because of an ')' at the end of the link.
It is because of the three dots.
@@jeevanraj5305the three dots are a visual thing done by CZcams lol
Lol
As someone who has learnt this at uni, i can say these videos have been the best explanation i have ever seen
Let me tell you that this just made me make sense of the DMX line impedance loads used to avoid "reflections" in the line.... I knew about this ripples or waves of "voltage" but I couldn't figure it out why a load of an "apparent impedance" could work to "destroy" them.... This is just amazing.... Thank you.
As someone working in testing motors for EVs, this video and the main channel one were GOLD! The Portuguese PhD who tries to educate me at work will love this, and hopefully i can understand more about EMC!
4 years of engineering bachelor, and now i understand why the characteristic impedance is seen briefly by the supply..... Thanks!
When I was a teen, I had a book about electronics by one G.M Scroggie. He described "transmission lines" in terms of a series of inductors in series with the two sides of the line, with capacitors across the two lines between each inductor. Basically a whole line of series/parallel tuned circuits which has an impedance related to the impedance of the capacitors and inductors. I didn't understand why, AT ALL. Now, thanks to THIS VIDEO, over 40 years later, I understand enough to SEE why you show it as tuned circuits. Not only that, but I know why the inductors are in series with the line, and the capacitors between the lines. I also see how the impedance works. I now understand why a CB Radio enthusiast needs a "Standing Wave Ratio" meter to ensure reflections are minimised at the aerial. This one series of videos has BLOWN MY MIND and I love it.
Never seen this much honesty in anything related to electricity. My heartfelt thanks and prayers to universe that every EE in the world follows you. I hate just assuming things because somebody says so with oomph and authority. You deserve 8 million subscribers not just 8K. Just keep it basic and honest. This content is like watching Faraday himself at work. So innocent and humble.
I’ve been trying to understand this for 20 years and this video finally made it click. Thank you so much!
At D.C., yes, it reaches an equilibrium quickly but the point of impedance matching is at high frequencies where peaks and dips of frequency response will occur if impedances aren't matched. I find it very interesting and enlightening seeing these high speed captures you are doing in understanding these phenomena. It makes it so much easier to see what is happening. It is distributed capacitance and inductance which creates the 150 Ohm (or whatever impedance, it depends on the cable configuration / geometry) and the distributed resistance which determines the Q (usually negligible), but the basis of why this happens is shown in the transient responses you are demonstrating. This is significant and will be appreciated by teachers in time. Please keep up the good work!
Now it makes sense, why I had to terminate a Modbus/RS485 wire pair bus with a 120 Ohm resistor, exactly to prevent signal reflection on the line. Thank you so much for all your videos, always looking forward to them!! 😊
One on each end I hope. :)
BTW, replacing the 120 Ω resistor with two 60 Ω resistors in series and connecting a "Properly sized" capacitor from the center point of the two resistors to ground will give you about a 3db noise reduction. See Jan Axelson's "Serial Port Complete" page 123 starting with "Terminations for Short Lines" for details.
Yes it's starting to make some sense ! VERY imformative videos !!
I'm battling another BUS system at Work, a Carlo Cavazzi Dupline system. (a type of large field automation system)
The signal is a Square wave with about 7 volt RMS and at 132 mS there are 128 waves, with different pulse width.
The transmission line is branched in several branches of different length, in total probably over 50 branches and combined, 2000+ meters of wire.
The system is generally used without any Termination at open ends, but we have lots of communication problems, which I attribute to open end cable reflections.
I wish someone at Carlo Gavazzi knew 5% of what others here know, so they could answer my questions 😐
@@daniel635biturbo Now that sounds like a fun one! :)
While adding impedance matching termination resistors should help out, it appears that your network is already below voltage. Adding termination resistors will increase the load on your network.
Okay, so the system runs at 1khz, and the choice of cable is up to you. Still, line terminations should help, but it would be dependent on what cable you used. Sounds like your voltage is quite a bit low (7 volts vs 8.2). Possibly a node is dragging the network down.
Since your system seems to be overloaded already, I would hold off on line terminations. You should have a "Stiff" voltage source before adding any more load.
At the data rates that the system runs at, a DC meter should suffice to (only) check voltage. But a scope would be pretty much mandatory to see what is really going on.
And I see what you are saying with the 128 "waves", that corresponds to the 16 x 8 matrix of device addresses with a sync pulse at the start. So the entire I/O "matrix" updates at 1hz?
Looks like someone figured out how to automate Morse code. What will they think of next? :)
My first recommendation, the easiest to install, and the one likely to have the best bang for the buck, is to chop the line in half and put a repeater in the middle. That will probably fix you up without having to do anything else. And it's not like you are delivering broadband speeds to the other end of the network. :)
Then you could measure each individual network and see if one is now at the magical 8.2 volts while the other is still at 7 volts. If this is the case, you probably have a module (node) dragging the buss down. And a scope will show if a node is at a different DC bias (the pulse will jump up or down for that node).
So is this for building automation, mining, metering, or?...
And finally PLCS.net is your friend, there are a handful of guys there that have used it. www.plctalk.net/qanda/showthread.php?t=11592&highlight=carlo+gavazzi+dupline
@@MrWaalkman Big thanks for your response, you probably now know more than me about how it works.
The RMS voltage is dependent of the duty cycle, so when I look at it in the ocilloscope I get probably 8,2 volt peak, have not really checked.
The system dates back to the 1990 in our factory, and are installed with non twisted 1,5mm2 homogenous copper leads, without any shielding.
Back in the 1980s Electromatic developed this in Denmark, but now the system is sold and manufactured in Italy.
And they seem to have lost A LOT of knowledge, my Swedish support can't really support my questions.
Earlier in the 1980s the installation recommendations were "free" do as you like, but now they ask why we don't have twisted pairs, or shielded cables....
Now, I can't really put my finger on what the problem really is, but I can see cable reflections on the waveform, and It's different depending where I measure in the system.
The problem presents itself with "Ghost signals" so the controller sets some inputs as TRUE for one communication cycle.
And that is a real problem handling in the "PLC" code, If I can't trust the signals, and the filtering methods are very clunky to say the least. (0,5 seconds+one cycle)
The controller should be able to handle 450mA load, and we are only at 30mA on the system that give me trouble.
After lots of research I found out that they sell "Termination units" I believe that it is a resistor and a capacitor and possibly a diode.
But have not cracked one open yet, this module is also called Impedance module, wonder why 😊
They recommend installing one (DT02) at 1200m from the controller in one cable end, but not several, as it "decreases possible transmission distances"
The termination unit don't seem to add any significant load, and the wave looks better, with one installed.
What I also find is that most "Ghost signals" occur during daytime, when the factory is in production, so the cable reflections are not solely the problem.
But perhaps the cable reflections make the system more sensitive to other signal noise, that occurs during daytime production.
Anyhow.... The Plctalk site seems down now, but I will take a look later, good tip !
I work with PCB layout a lot, this series reminds me of a presentation from Rick Hartley on how to achieve proper grounding with circuits on and off circuit boards. That one was packed with a bunch of seemingly counterintuitive goodies as well. Fact is, we have been too dependent on the DC laws and the model we built in our head about the AC domain was some sort of extension from DC, and it turned out to be overly intuitive and incorrect. Rick described traces on the PCB as waveguides for electromagnetic fields to travel along, and it's not the electrons moving inside them that carries the engery, but rather the electromagnetic field around the conductors. When people get it seriously wrong, they end up facing a ton of crosstalks on a circuit board and scratch their heads wondering how the pulses "leaked out" of the traces. No, they were never inside the traces.
14:12 I think that the pulse travelling down each fork in the wire is about 67% of the pulse in the 1st wire. That's because the 1st wire sees a termination of 75 Ω (the parallel of the 2 lines in the fork), and therefore 1/3 of the pulse will be reflected back (as shown).
That 1/3 is given by the reflection coefficient Γ = (Zʟ-Zo)/(Zʟ+Zo) where Zo is the line impedance Zo = 150 Ω and Zʟ is the load terminating that line which in this case is Zʟ = 75 Ω.
I hope Brian reads your comment. I came up with the same ratio: at the fork boundary, the transmitted voltage pulses are +2/3 of the incoming pulse and reflected pulse is −1/3 only.
As for power, transmitted powers are both 4/9 of initial power and reflected power is 1/9, hence a 100 % total.
As someone who dabbles in ham radio and is always concerned with impedances and SWR, this is really fascinating. Would be neat to see you demonstrate this experiment with sin waves and resonant and non resonant antennas. Also, your Y cable is basically like an “open end stub match” used to match one impedance to another. You could explore that with these experiments too!
Thank you! I am 53, have been interested in antennas and electronics my whole life, and never really understood cable impedance properly until now. One of the best explainer videos ive ever seen!
Im just getting into hobby RF. perfect video to help me understand impedance matching and tuning.
DUDE!!! You deserve some kind of recognition reward for these videos my man... brilliant explanation reinforced with the excellent visual aids; you added that last little touch needed to make all the pieces of understanding come together in completion of the big picture.
I know this has taken you many, many hours to do, on top of filming and editing to create a video to share with all of us. So truly bro, thank you for your time, it has been a great help and has that side quality of being good entertainment as well. My main hobby is learning, and these few vids on this little mini series has been great. Well all of your videos are high quality, but the way you dismantle a difficult to truly grasp concept like this, plus accompanying it with experiment data and visual animations etc is top notch. Seriously someone should pay u for these....
Have a good one bro, just wanted to Eexpress my gratitude for things like this. Being in R&D as a chem. engr. I know how much time goes into investigative experiments like this so I just wanted to say your efforts are very much appreceiated.
Incidentally, the resistive wire kind of shows why we use series termination in digital lines that aren’t highly impedance controlled - having a signal switching on and off, we put a small series resistor, often near the source (transmit side) to absorb some of the reflection that comes from impedance mismatch or discontinuities when the signal is being switched. Having the whole line being resistive isn’t desirable because it’d absorb (I.e. waste) a lot of power, and you’d have to drive a lot more current into it, but a small series termination resistor helps absorb reflections and ringing without much loss.
It's just like the damper in a shock absorber. If you only have a damper it burns up, and if you only use the springs it bounces too much.
Source termination is actually fascinating if you match it to the line impedance - at the transmitting end it forms a divider with your microstrip and thus only half the voltage goes down the wire, but at the receiving end with its near-infinite impedance, the voltage doubles due to the reflection and the signal is preserved!
Then the reflection goes back up and gets eaten by the source termination resistor, although you can send multiple pulses and the waves will just go through each other.
In a digital line, you have all the odd harmonics making up the square wave, therefore you want the characteristics impedance of the line to be non-dispersive ( having the same phase velocity for all frequencies) to avoid having a "slew" in your square wave pulse (which would be caused by different present harmonics having different phase velocities).
The data collection and subsequent visualization / animation here was incredible! This is remarkable to see how the measurements really demonstrated exactly what you were describing. Bravo for what I am sure was a significant undertaking in capturing all of this data!
Shweeet!!!!! More about my favorite part of the main video!! Thanks for the link to this one!
Yeah man, this is so cool! Learning more about electrical shenanigans makes me understand more and more why it's such a good analog to sound
Thanks! I “learned” about impedance back in 1976. But I never truly grokked it until now. Your incredible patience taking all those behind the scenes oscilloscope readings really paid off.
the animation with the several different line impedances is fantastic. i wish this video existed way back when i was in engineering school!
This was fascinating to watch, especially with the addition of all the o-scope plots. Seeing how the waves propogate through the circuit, reflect, and eventually find an equilibrium was so cool. Thanks for making this!
The measurements and visualizations are incredible in these videos! Gives me a real sense of understanding how it all actually works.
Excellent. Truely, these two videos are invaluable and I want to show them to a lot of undergraduate and graduate students. Congratulations on explaining the concepts so well!
This is very visual. Thanks for doing this incredible tedious and crazy task of measuring!
You can simulate transmission lines without dirt effects in ltspice or qspice and compare the results.
I love these well made videos, that clearly explain something complex/technical, and invoke an "oh my gosh, so that's why" epiphany.
I've been looking for exactly this these days and you just posted an amazing way to visualize it. I think it would be worth to mention - without going too much into details - displacement current in these cases, which is how Maxwell's equations describe the "opposite ends of the wire talking". Incredible job!
I love the oscilloscope/line plots! I've always understood transmission impedance as the infinite ladder of inductors and capacitors, but never seen it measured/plotted like this -- very helpful!
Masterpiece.
I cannot imagine the amount of time and measures you spent on this project.
Thank you!
What a fantastic video. I've been doing electronics engineering for two decades and never had the intuition that this video just gave me. I love how empirical it is!
What I love about this is that it's basically just standard wave mechanics. Like, the graph of the voltages along the wire seemed fairly intuitive to me because it looks pretty well exactly like the wave mechanics I learned in high school physics.
Thank you for making this follow up. It's how I wanted the first video to finish! Awesome.
These probe waves are awesome for visual learning of electrical paths. I loved the main channel one and this is a great followup. Awesome work
This video and its other half are some of the coolest you have made so far, and given how highly I rate your channel thats really something. I can only imagine how long you have spent getting these plots.
The animated graphs from this video series are really well done. Really helps cement everything you are talking about.
I have been trying to understand impedance matching to make a pcb wifi antenna for an esp32 chip and this explains exactly why the antenna needs to be impedance matched. I have watched a couple of hour long pcb design seminars trying to wrap my head around it and you made it make sense within 5 minutes.
As an electronic engineer I have learned all this but in a dry theoretical way. You make it visible. Thanks for your enormous effort. You must love it.
I have used the reflection principle to find damage on data cables and cable studs to filter out unwanted frequencies. An open ended cable stud of 1/4 wave length of cause represent a short when connected parallel (at the right frequency and some of it's harmonics only of cause).
I am subscribed to your video's and like watching them as although I know a lot of it I do not know it all and I still learn from both you and some of your viewers comments.
This video managed to teach me weeks of undergrad EE material in a matter of minutes. Hands down the best explanation of impedance (and electric flow in general).
I'm SO glad you made this video because my first thought upon watching the first one was that it makes impedance matching make perfect sense!
This is all stuff that I've studied in uni but no professor explained it this clearly! Great job!!
I admire your work! Complicated concepts explained in a simple way. Just keep it up, well done!
Good explanation, and great visualisations! Though I wouldn’t say that the initial current is “too much” or “too little” because I don’t think it’s useful to think of a transient in terms of the circuit’s future steady state. It’s exactly what it needs to be based on its current state (the impedance of the line that the transient has traveled down so far), and it obviously it doesn’t ‘want’ or ‘expect’ to see a load that is the same as the characteristic impedance, it has no information about what’s coming (and it goes without saying that it has no ability to desire anything!). Usually the *designer* wants impedance to be matched (in an audio, RF or high-speed digital circuit especially), but the electrons are just going to do what they do.
How do you know electricity is not a living, conscious being? That's just a speculation or yours
I think that the anthropomorphisation helps with intuition. Everyone obviously understands that the wavefront isn't actually a living being.
And I do think that it makes sense to think of the wave as "expecting" something. If it hits anything other than the characteristic impedance along the line, it ceases to be a wave and becomes two waves (forward and reflected). Thus, the wave only exists as long as the impedance doesn't change and can be thought of as "expecting" a specific impedance.
The concept of a wave is already a very human abstraction to begin with, so using that kind of language doesn't really change much.
One of the most astounding and informative series of videos I've ever seen. Just phenomenally good. Bravo!!
Thank you. This video provided answers I have been looking for for about 10 years. When I was young I was really passionate about music. That got me into physics and I eventually became an engineer (though not an electrical engineer). After watching your videos I feel like I have finally understood some of the questions that younger me had about speakers, amplifiers, and electric instruments.
I have really enjoyed the work you have done on electricity here. The other content is great too. You are my favorite CZcamsr and this is my first comment.
This is exactly what I was hoping to see after the previous video!
Best visual demonstration I've ever come across. When its AC, things get much more complicated. Even a small impedance mismatch can be amplified
This is a brilliant and painstaking way to de-mystify what electrons are doing when you turn on DC, and gives insight into why standing waves exist when you have an RF source. I'm going to use this pair of videos with new hams, Thanks so much!!
I have always known since I first saw the leaves in a Leyden Jar, that electron density is always a factor in figuring out the details of how circuits work. I'm glad you have publicized this aspect of 'live' circuits.
I appreciate the ton of work you put into this! Thank you!
This was awesome, has completely cleared up this cloud I had around this topic. Keep it up!
Excellent work. This is one of the best videos I've ever seen.
I admire the ingenuity and patience needed to setup this experiment.
This series is great, and the idea of combining multiple oscilloscope traces is fantastic. I hope you will continue it with some AC meassurements.
Bravo Alpha Phoenix!
Tons of work to show us visually what’s happening, and that’s why I can follow it.
Thank you.
I've always found impedance matching somewhat intuitive, but honestly I'm seriously impressed with your experimental setup and the resulting graphs. Awesome job!! Thanks for all the effort and the great video!
Really helpful way to observe something which is very hard to understand. Thanks for your hard work in putting this together and thank you for calling out the anthropomorphisms used too often to describe why something happens in the physical world.
Best explanation of electrical impedance I've ever heard/seen. Your videos are brilliant. Well done. Thx
Wow, just wow. What a great way to convey a bunch of really tough concepts. I took a computerized instrumentation design course for my physics undergrad about 35 years ago at Cornell. We had an analog oscilloscope, and we're doing our data capture using an Apple 2 computer. It's amazing how far we've come in that time. There's no way we could have done anything like this with that equipment.
Like you, I've been generally familiar with the concept of line and circuit impedence ever since those days. For instance, I've always known that speaker wire is typically 8 ohms and knew that was important to maintain the quality of the sound. Still, I always felt I was missing the big picture. I also know that within networks, having proper line terminators is important and was even more so back in the day when we used bnc cables. These reflections are the reason. Imagine if these pulses were bouncing back from every connection or disconnected line.
So now you need to move on to what this means in A/C circuits. It becomes even more important in that context where you don't ever have a steady state, and you are always dealing with some component of the line impedance. I know I these circuits you can easily get RLC coupling between the impedance, the inductance, and the capacitance of the wires and the rest of the circuit often creating a virtual high or low pass filter that degrades the signal.
This could even be a good opportunity to do a cross-over with one of the more math heavy channels (3 blue 1 brown, maybe? ). You could handle all the practical demonstration side of it like you've done here. Grant could then talk about signal filtering, complex analysis, and / or how differential equations enable us to characterize these circuits. Those are really tough topics, but a demonstration like this would really help make them tangible. I'd also like to see what happens if you two collaborated on the data visualization. You both do an amazing job but have different styles based on the kind of content you do.
Thanks!
Your 17 minute explanation has made more sense than an entire semester of transmission lines! Amazing! My circuit has been completed😅
At 5:20, impedance matching fully made sense after all these years of trying to understand it. This and the other video have been monumental to my understanding of electricity. Thank you for all this!
This was super informative and very beautifully illustrated! I can only imagine all the work that went into it, thanks for a great video :)
This is amazing. I did an electrical engineering school 20 years ago, with between 4 and 8 hours a week of electromagnetic waves or transmission lines, and I never got as good an insight as to what was actually happening as after watching less than an hour of your videos. Great job!
From my experience, engineering school gets too wrapped up in teaching equations and methods with not enough focus on understanding the concept that drives the method or equation. Some professors are incredibly bad about this and others understand it totally
Thanks for visualizing this. I always knew fundamentally why it was important and how to correct it, but this is very easy to understand as a big picture.
This is a very good explanation of impedance. It's very important in the context of AC waveforms and speakers and this is the most clear explanation of why impedance occurs that I've ever seen.
This is beautiful! Thank you very much for doing this video, that's the best explanation I've ever seen on impedance. Great choice of measurement to support your explanation.
The animation hitting the different loads is top notch!
I found this more interesting and insightful than the main video. Thank you for this!
stellar content. This beats any explanation I've seen before for line impedance and impedance matching that doesn't require a very solid understanding of maxwell's laws.
the visualizations you’ve done for this are incredible. I need to watch this a few times to drill it in
Gosh this and the other video on measuring waves of electricity was absolutely brilliant. Thanks for opening my eyes.
What a very cool series you've created,
we have to use a TDR for finding faults on power cables, with you explanation has really helped visualise what is happening to the cable when we put the TDR on and why the traces move in the directions they do for a open or short type fault, with a way better explanation that our technicians could do
This aventure has been so helpfull in tieing core concepts together thanks. Strangly watching this has helped me understand AC faults so much more as well. Maybe its me extrapolating your visulisations.
Keep doing what you do! Thanks.
THANK YOU. I asked the exact same question at 8:53 in university 10 years ago and got a very vague awnser. Am am so happy I finally have a intuitive explanation.
This video has solved a year long mystery for me. Thank you so much!
This is one of the best pieces I've ever seen on the subject as far as being understandable.
This is an excellent explanation and the graphics make that possible. Thank you!
Great physical explanation of impedance. Best I have seen...
What a wonderful video and explanation. Thank you. You know, none of us can see electrons moving, shifting or drifting, so theory gets imagined as mathematics. But even mathematics is not good at giving us some kind of understanding that satisfies our sensibilities as human logic thinkers. So, we need all these metaphors and explanations to help us. This is a good one. In "reality," it may be nothing like anyone ever imagined, but it doesn't matter. Physics and philosophy of nature are being re-formed every year. I think these kinds of explanations of the world around us are even more important than what we learned in class, because they associate some sense around the math. Thanks again for taking the time to make this video.
Thank you. I appreciate the enormous effort you put into this.
You really missed the chance to make this channel BetaPhoenix
I have waited all my life to intuitively understand this! Thank you, thank you.
Beyond impressive. This is main channel video quality, even if it's a follow-up video. This one is almost more interesting than the first!
this was really interesting. thanks for the time you put into this. nice!
I have learned more in these series of video than in my entire post secondary education. This visualization changes everything!
Awesome video and explanation. This helps me understand why impedance matching is so critical for audio
Woah! This was always a hand-wavey topic for me that I never put in the effort to fully understand. What an epic visualization!
2 videos in one day? This is truly a treat!
I'm teaching my self ee for diy hifi and this was super helpful! Thank you.
You guys, this is awesome. Thank you so much. I have to play with cellular DAS systems and trade school did NOT go this far into the nitty-gritty.
Oh man, if only there would be such amazing videos back when I was studying Radio Engineering in the first couple of years of university. This is beyond amazing.
Btw, in radio engineering we’re dealing with all kinds of impedance mismatching, impedance matching… for example, I would often think of an antenna as a device that matches impedance between a wave guide and an open space.
Maybe it also has some analogies in audio (speakers/microphones), but I’m not knowledgeable enough in audio to say something useful.
Such a cool way of visualizing this! Your content is so engaging and would be great supplemental material for classrooms.
Crossing my fingers that your next video will show impedance matching with AC signals and an antenna so we can see the magic happen in RF communication systems!
Fantastic video. Feels like water cooling my brain when I finally get a concept.