Argument and Dialectic (Aquinas 101)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
  • ⭐️ Donate $5 to help keep these videos FREE for everyone!
    Pay it forward for the next viewer: go.thomisticin...
    The calling of St. Thomas Aquinas was to pose all the most relevant questions, face all the most relevant difficulties involved in each question, and draw all the relevant distinctions.
    Argument and Dialectic (Aquinas 101) - Fr. James Brent, O.P.
    For readings, podcasts, and more videos like this, go to www.Aquinas101.com. While you’re there, be sure to sign up for one of our free video courses on Aquinas. And don’t forget to like and share with your friends, because it matters what you think!
    Subscribe to our channel here:
    www.youtube.co...
    --
    Aquinas 101 is a project of the Thomistic Institute that seeks to promote Catholic truth through short, engaging video lessons. You can browse earlier videos at your own pace or enroll in one of our Aquinas 101 email courses on St. Thomas Aquinas and his masterwork, the Summa Theologiae. In these courses, you'll learn from expert scientists, philosophers, and theologians-including Dominican friars from the Province of St. Joseph.
    Enroll in Aquinas 101 to receive the latest videos, readings, and podcasts in your email inbox each Tuesday morning.
    Sign up here: aquinas101.tho...
    Help us film Aquinas 101!
    Donate here: go.thomisticin...
    Want to represent the Thomistic Institute on your campus? Check out our online store!
    Explore here: go.thomisticin...
    Stay connected on social media:
    / thomisticinstitute
    / thomisticinstitute
    / thomisticinst
    Visit us at: thomisticinsti...
    #Aquinas101 #ThomisticInstitute #ThomasAquinas #Catholic

Komentáře • 34

  • @ulyssesalbacite516
    @ulyssesalbacite516 Před 3 lety +21

    i was a non believer of God, when this channel came i thought i was so ignorant to believe there was no God, all the explanation they make is so clear and logical they are arriving already on truth the form of good, keep spreading the light father ✋😔

  • @valethemajor
    @valethemajor Před 5 lety +35

    So good, so insightful, well animated (and good sound design), and a great step to draw a lot of us in who digest information from videos, or at least let that be our initial draw before stepping into text. Deeply appreciated.

  • @teresabaker-carl9668
    @teresabaker-carl9668 Před 5 lety +26

    Absolutely fascinating! This gives me a whole new perspective on certain things. Thank you.

  • @terriwilsonclark
    @terriwilsonclark Před 4 lety +12

    Thank you for this course. I'm learning about St. Thomas Aquinas before I delve into the Summa Theologia that my kids got me as an early Christmas gift. You're a big help to me.

  • @kristindreko3194
    @kristindreko3194 Před 2 lety +2

    Thank you, may our Lord Jesus Christ bless you!

  • @nickd7986
    @nickd7986 Před 4 lety +4

    This really helps to make sense of well contradictions in truth

  • @lizetrocha
    @lizetrocha Před 3 lety +3

    I’m here because of Fr. Gregory Pine and Pints with Aquinas. Love your videos btw!

  • @dancapes1
    @dancapes1 Před 4 lety +5

    This is absolutely awesome. I just watched a talk about a medical ethicist who made the claim that disputes in the courts, media, social media, etc moves the practice of medicine towards more ethical practices. He framed it in terms of Hobbs idea of implied social contracts (of which I know little) but that our ethics of medicine is constantly being re-negotiated with the culture and society at large. But it seems that if viewed from a Thomistic lens, that if done correctly these disputes in medical ethics can lead us to the truth the appropriate ends and means of new developing technologies!

  • @jamescrossley8599
    @jamescrossley8599 Před 2 lety +1

    A wonderful explanation and pleasant antidote to despair of discovering absolute truth. Thank you.

  • @Lmerosne
    @Lmerosne Před 4 lety +6

    Nice video. The definition of dialectic seems assumed. It would be good to succinctly define what it is and then describe it.

  • @Enigmatic_philosopher

    Here is a philosophical critique of the video "Argument and Dialectic (Aquinas 101)" from the perspective of the arguments and topics discussed in the video:
    This video provides a helpful introduction and overview of how Thomas Aquinas approached arguments and dialectic in his philosophical and theological works. According to the video, Aquinas engaged in careful logical argumentation and acknowledged rational objections and counterarguments from opposing philosophical perspectives. His use of dialectic, or respectful exchange of differing reasonable positions, demonstrates his view that divine truths can be explored and better understood through civil philosophical discourse.
    The video outlines three main components of Aquinas' dialectical method. The first is showing how arguments from authority like sacred Scripture and Church Tradition can be supported by rational philosophy. However, some may argue this approach gives religion too much privilege in philosophical inquiry. The second aspect discussed is Aquinas addressing common objections to theological or philosophical stances he defended. While this displays openness to critique, it could still be accused of ultimately prioritizing defending predetermined conclusions. Third, the video notes Aquinas drawing on the philosophies of others like Aristotle but adapting and transforming them as needed to integrate with revelation. Yet one may question how much openness there was to having his theological or philosophical system fundamentally challenged.
    Overall, this video provides a fair introduction to Aquinas' respect for reasoned arguments, acknowledgement of alternative positions, and integration of various philosophical sources into his thought. However, some more critical questions could be raised about how open his dialectical method ultimately was to the possibility of conclusions other than those he had already determined to be true based on his theological and philosophical foundations. A more postmodern perspective may argue no thinker, including Aquinas, engaged in truly neutral philosophical dialectic untainted by predetermined convictions. But the video helpfully highlights Aquinas' aim for philosophical rigor and responsiveness to critique within his own historical context.

  • @joyfulbellyayurveda
    @joyfulbellyayurveda Před 2 lety

    As an aside: Elevation affects the freezing point only slightly. Even at very high altitudes the freezing point of water only increases by .01 Celsius...

  • @sgmc5358
    @sgmc5358 Před 2 lety

    Now, this is nice. I really like the tone of mini-lecture. Is there any resources of yours to learn more about dialectics in christian thought? What is the attitude to Hegel's and his approach, for example?

  • @iqgustavo
    @iqgustavo Před 11 měsíci

    🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
    00:20 🤔 Aristotle saw the conflict of opinions as an opportunity to find truth through a process of inquiry called dialectic.
    01:11 🌦️ Progress in understanding involves confronting difficulties or puzzles, drawing distinctions, and gaining insights to resolve conflicts in knowledge.
    03:33 📚 Saint Thomas Aquinas used dialectic to systematically work through questions, face difficulties, and draw distinctions, resulting in perennial truths in theology.
    Made with HARPA AI

  • @annakareninacamara6580

    "We learn at school that snows melts at 32 degrees"
    My metric brain took a few seconds to process that.

  • @dtybur10
    @dtybur10 Před rokem

    To live life without judgement of others, to have sympathy, empathy, and humility, is the tenets of a more fulfilling life. I have found these without the Bible or church. But as a believer in Jesus, these coincidentally, were his teachings. Self awareness is of utmost importance. I'm still learning, and putting into practice these attributes every day. Wether you have a profound belief in god, or not, you can still walk with Jesus.

  • @gailwedgeworth7517
    @gailwedgeworth7517 Před 2 lety

    Our society is starving to death for need of God and critical thinking. Thanks

  • @alexkrauth5779
    @alexkrauth5779 Před 4 lety +1

    Isn't 3:30- 3:50 the scientific method?

    • @brodiejavelin2447
      @brodiejavelin2447 Před 4 lety +12

      Yes, the scientific method which is based on ideals from the age of enlightenment which were based on the discoveries of the renaissance, which was influenced by the works of St Thomas (and other scholastics)

    • @rasheedlewis1
      @rasheedlewis1 Před rokem

      Well, actually no.
      In the scientific, you pose a hypothesis.
      And there’s supposed to be an experiment which (ideally) should be replicated.
      And the conclusions will prove, disprove, or make inconclusive the original hypothesis.

  • @zacheryhershberger7508

    Do these guys ever debate real philosophers or do they just get off pretending that Aquinas's philosophy wasn't completely overthrown in the Enlightenment?

    • @anthonybui4622
      @anthonybui4622 Před 2 lety +6

      Fr Gregory Pine does not necessarily with other philosophers but he makes objections. This channel's purpose is to teach thomistic philosophy to new people

    • @rockycomet4587
      @rockycomet4587 Před 2 lety +1

      The latter, and it's way better than the former.

    • @user-gs4oi1fm4l
      @user-gs4oi1fm4l Před rokem

      This very video is a response to Postmodern Nihilism, a product of the Enlightenment

    • @thefrenchareharlequins2743
      @thefrenchareharlequins2743 Před rokem

      Aquinas caused the enlightenment