100% AWESOME - 100% FREE | MILVIZ F4J Phantom II (Freeware) | Mach Loop | Microsoft Flight Simulator

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 17. 06. 2024
  • Become a Channel Member: / @intothebluesimulations
    Become a Patreon: / intothebluesim
    Donate Via Paypal: paypal.me/IntotheBlueSim?loca...
    "Buy me a coffee" www.buymeacoffee.com/IntotheBlue
    Channel Discord: / discord
    In this video, we take a look at the ported MILVIZ / Blackbird Simulations F-4J Phantom II, available for free within Microsoft Flight Simulator (MSFS). We'll be taking our Phantom on a run around the Mach Loop (EGOV), before landing her on the deck of the USS Forrestal.
    MILVZ F-4J Phantom II (port): flightsim.to/file/75938/milvi...
    Please note this video and all its contents / materials, is for entertainment / simulation purposes only.
    PC Specs
    ASUS Z790
    Intel Core i9 13900K 5.8GHz
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
    64GB DDR4 3600MHz
    Hardware
    Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog
    Saitek Pro Flight rudder pedals
    HP Reverb WMR headset
    TrackIR5
    Earthquake Shell Shoxx transducer
    Enjoy the flight!
  • Hry

Komentáře • 87

  • @marekpaul6110
    @marekpaul6110 Před měsícem +34

    This is one of the few channels where I hit like before even watching the video. Always excellent content very professionally presented and edited.

    • @nickk8762
      @nickk8762 Před měsícem +1

      Could not agree more!

    • @hjr2000
      @hjr2000 Před měsícem +1

      Same here 🎉

    • @smudge0356
      @smudge0356 Před měsícem

      I did the very same thing! 🫢😁
      Just slammed on the 👍🏼 (like a speed-brake on 'the loop'), BEFORE watching the flight. 😉😂

    • @johnrenton3463
      @johnrenton3463 Před měsícem

      +1 🙂

  • @jaysmith4302
    @jaysmith4302 Před měsícem +17

    Very nice. The Mach Loop was described with the precision of Jackie Stewart narrating a lap of the Nurburgring.

  • @Sebastopolmark
    @Sebastopolmark Před měsícem +7

    That was a GREAT circuit for that flight. You really spoil us, all of your videos have very appropriate intros and final flight seconds. This jet has a Value Coefficient of 10. It works and it's FREE! !! !!!

  • @mickthemardy
    @mickthemardy Před měsícem +3

    Valley was opened during WW2 as a diversion/refuelling station for American aircraft crossing the Atlantic. It was picked as it was rarely fogged in. It was said the average wind speed at VAL was Force 8! Mona predates VAL. It was originally an airship station for the fledgling Royal Navy Air Service. American and RAF WW2 crews had to be careful of Holyhead Mountain as its right on the approach for 13. Sadly, a number of crews crash on the mountain, and there is a memorial of a B25 Mitchell's propeller dedicated to their memory on the mountain.

  • @OilNBolts1
    @OilNBolts1 Před měsícem +4

    Lots of fun! A big heavy aircraft the Phantom. Fella with the cubicle next to mine back in the '90s flew them in Vietnam. He did have stories to tell..

  • @tomsear1
    @tomsear1 Před 22 dny

    once in a international mil wargame with a RAF pilot of this era; who flew many airframes; when asked what was best to pilot - without hesitation - said the F4 - noting the extraordinary acceleration and power as awe inspiring

  • @Maxley..
    @Maxley.. Před měsícem +1

    A truly iconic aeroplane. During the US/Vietnam war they called it "The World’s Leading Distributor of MiG Parts”.

  • @tac-cobserver3788
    @tac-cobserver3788 Před měsícem +2

    Awesome, thanks for the review 🙏
    Milviz 🤙

  • @mrg6182
    @mrg6182 Před měsícem

    Fantastic job and the running commentary is spot on, thank you Sir…

  • @nickk8762
    @nickk8762 Před měsícem

    Always brilliant videos. Informative, entertaining, and high production values. Thankyou so much sir! Much appreciated.

  • @thefuzz1172
    @thefuzz1172 Před měsícem +1

    Excellent flying, I wouldn't want to put it down on a carrier!

  • @DeeQ-cy8xt
    @DeeQ-cy8xt Před 6 dny

    Many thanx for this👍 I grew up watching these flying over my village 👋

    • @IntotheBlueSimulations
      @IntotheBlueSimulations  Před dnem

      My absolute pleasure, DeeQ! I’m really glad you enjoyed the video and that it brought back some nice memories : )
      Cheers and all the best!

  • @larrysouthern5098
    @larrysouthern5098 Před měsícem

    NICE LANDING. good looking F4 MODEL..

  • @hueyfoo
    @hueyfoo Před měsícem

    That smoke trail proved deadly for the crew during the peak of the VN war.

  • @Simple-Flight-Simulation
    @Simple-Flight-Simulation Před měsícem +1

    Wow!!! Your videos are ALWAYS sooooo good! You have a remarkable talent for producing informative, entertaining and enticing videos... and then you say they're not tutorials??? Sir, they most definitely are... You have a flare for showcasing dramatic aerial photography... it just keeps me coming back for more. I could only hope to achieve your level of video production one day!!! Great stuff, thank you!!! 👍 🎞📽😄

  • @rogerrees9845
    @rogerrees9845 Před měsícem

    Thank you for another great presentation....Very entertaining...Roger..
    Pembrokeshire..

  • @DanBlake3rd
    @DanBlake3rd Před měsícem

    I imagine that a Phantom making a low pass over one's head at mach 1, would be quite exhilarating. Once you recovered.

  • @dillank3240
    @dillank3240 Před měsícem

    It looks much better (visually) than the DC Designs F-4. I do like flying it, though, waiting for Blackbird or Heatblur. The one in this video isn't an option because I am on Xbox. The F-4 is a favourite for me since childhood.
    Nice landing, by the way! This video depicts a perfect flight in a Royal Navy Phantom!

  • @adamditch5835
    @adamditch5835 Před měsícem

    As ever a great video to watch. Great to see the F4 in the Mach Loop...Nice carrier landing on the Constellation too...I need to practice more..🫣

  • @getsideways7257
    @getsideways7257 Před měsícem

    You know what CAN much more than just "hold a candle" to the DCS Phantom? The Advanced version of the same Phantoms pack from MilViz. Also 100% free, but alas you can only have it in FSX or P3D flavor. Still 100% worth it if you are even slighting into proper flight dynamics.

  • @thisisadebrown
    @thisisadebrown Před měsícem

    In fact, the Air Force didn’t get the F4J until after the Falklands war to substitute 23 squadron aircraft that were down in the Falkland Islands so they didn’t even have that colour scheme under that type of

  • @TheMaximac
    @TheMaximac Před měsícem

    We were trained to always follow the centerline on take off and landing.

  • @greatclantoni
    @greatclantoni Před měsícem

    Nice landing. 👍

  • @olly7248
    @olly7248 Před měsícem +1

    That’s an FGR2 ‘Treble-One’ Squadron colour scheme that was never anywhere near an F4-J 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @IntotheBlueSimulations
      @IntotheBlueSimulations  Před dnem

      Hi Olly,
      I think the Devs just added extra paint schemes, for the sake of user interest. As a couple of other viewers pointed out, it seems model adjustments have been made to this “F4J” mod, in order to make this particular variant look more like an FGR2 (the modelling of the tail being one example).
      All the best!

  • @TheSound0fLegends
    @TheSound0fLegends Před měsícem +2

    I can never seem to fly the loop correctly, do you have a flight plan for this?

  • @johannberger9630
    @johannberger9630 Před měsícem

    Wow! Thank you for the Info and the great video! Best regards dear ITBS!

  • @mikecoffee100
    @mikecoffee100 Před měsícem

    That was A GREAAT FLIGHT A GREAT FLIGHT

  • @Stwutter1973
    @Stwutter1973 Před měsícem

    Great vid. Why the snow in June?

    • @andrewmorgan1819
      @andrewmorgan1819 Před měsícem +3

      Have you ever been to Wales? RAF Valley can have four seasons before lunchtime🤣

  • @Reaper88-rw8tb
    @Reaper88-rw8tb Před měsícem +5

    Awesome but free means no Xbox release!!! Because the marketplace is allergic to free products

  • @234liney
    @234liney Před měsícem +1

    It looks really good except that it is an FG1 with J79's fitted?🤔

  • @timothyparker7739
    @timothyparker7739 Před 12 dny

    Brilliant!!!!!

    • @IntotheBlueSimulations
      @IntotheBlueSimulations  Před 5 dny +1

      Thanks very much, Timothy - I’m really glad you enjoyed the video! Cheers and all the best : )

  • @astronav24
    @astronav24 Před měsícem +3

    111 Sqn never had the F4J, only F4K which were ex Royal Navy Phantoms.

    • @BlackKnight344
      @BlackKnight344 Před měsícem

      Only 74 (Tiger) Squadron ( 'I Fear no man') were the only F-4J 's (updated to S standard) to operate in the UK. Its somewhat fitting that the flight is from EGOV as it is the current home of the Tigers, which is now an OCU Squadron (flying Hawks).

    • @234liney
      @234liney Před měsícem +1

      74 Sqn disbanded in September 2000 and is no longer active.

  • @thegreathadoken6808
    @thegreathadoken6808 Před měsícem

    Yeah, 420 knots. I see what you did there, don't try to deny it 😉

  • @techstepman
    @techstepman Před měsícem

    hey whats that opening music?

  • @bstikkel
    @bstikkel Před měsícem +1

    It seems as if there is and stays a kind of protection cover at the top of the tail and rudder. I searched in pictures at Google for this aircraft, but I could not find a picture of a version with that kind of tail top. Is this a special version?

    • @IntotheBlueSimulations
      @IntotheBlueSimulations  Před dnem

      Hi Bstikkel,
      I believe, the fin modification you’re referring to, is to house an RWR (Radar Warning Receiver) on certain variants of the F4 (more accurately, the aircraft demonstrated in this video appears to be an FGR2 Phantom, as opposed to the F4J designation of the mod itself).
      I hope that clarifies things a little. All the best! : )

    • @bstikkel
      @bstikkel Před dnem

      Thank you for your explanation.

  • @ronstewtsaw
    @ronstewtsaw Před měsícem +1

    I know essentially zero about naval aviation. But I thought that the carrier's angled runway is for landing, and the fore-and-aft one is for take-off? Or is that only in some particular circumstance? Would somebody please illuminate me?

    • @IntotheBlueSimulations
      @IntotheBlueSimulations  Před dnem +1

      Hello Ron,
      I’m no expert myself but, I believe you’re correct. Depending on the carrier, the catapults are located on the foredeck and the “angled runway” (with arrestor gear) is used for landing. I did use the “angled runway” for my landing, in this video (though perhaps, that wasn’t immediately apparent, given the layout of the carrier).
      I hope that clarifies things a little. All the best! : )

    • @ronstewtsaw
      @ronstewtsaw Před dnem

      @@IntotheBlueSimulations Oh yes, now I see that you did! I need do do some vector sums to figure out why the landing runway does not seen to track to the right on approach. It might help if the carrier had a wake.
      Much gratitude for the reply!

  • @abdullakhashabi
    @abdullakhashabi Před měsícem +1

    Can one tell me how is it that camera is moving as if it is on top of a pilots helmet

    • @IntotheBlueSimulations
      @IntotheBlueSimulations  Před dnem

      Hi Abdulla,
      I’m using a head-tracking device called "TrackIR" for the camera movements. It's great, although a little pricey. There are cheaper / freeware alternatives available though, should you wish to give it a go for yourself : )
      I hope that helps. All the best!

  • @2canYT
    @2canYT Před měsícem

    goooood morning VIETNAMMM

  • @chadvader974
    @chadvader974 Před měsícem

    Why dies f4j cockpit look older than the f4e

  • @imellor711
    @imellor711 Před měsícem

    Great video and it's great to see that we're still getting quality free aircraft.
    I have a favour to ask I thee any way you can do a video to draw up the mac loop on the in house msfs map, so we can replace the mac loop run and then you could exoand this with other instruction videos on the do the northern UK loop and starwars canyon within the USA?
    Just a thought.

  • @angelusuk909
    @angelusuk909 Před měsícem +1

    How does it compare to the F4J compare to DC Designs version?

    • @smudge0356
      @smudge0356 Před měsícem +1

      Just 35mins ago, I watched AvAngel's, 'First Look & Review'. It was "fun" and "an icon", but has poor visuals (looked more FSX than this) and System Modelling was definitely lacking. I'll save my £30, for something else/better!

    • @johnwicks4936
      @johnwicks4936 Před měsícem

      Typical.

    • @Danko05
      @Danko05 Před měsícem

      Thanks for the review, looks awesome so much better than many payware stuff.

  • @keysersoze1855
    @keysersoze1855 Před měsícem

    Can you share that route please sir?

  • @smacman68
    @smacman68 Před měsícem +5

    As cool as this version of the Phantom is, it pales in comparison with the DCS version just released by Heatblur. It’s stunning in its details and how the weapons are modeled

  • @sinanemir4602
    @sinanemir4602 Před měsícem +1

    better than dcs...

  • @Winwin-ds7cc
    @Winwin-ds7cc Před měsícem

    The first person😊

  • @JeffSagen
    @JeffSagen Před měsícem +1

    Jeffrey

  • @normg2242
    @normg2242 Před měsícem

    When the DC Designs Phantom was released, I held back because I wanted to wait until someone made one with better-looking textures. I'm glad I did, because here it is...!!!

    • @Schwxrzritter
      @Schwxrzritter Před měsícem +2

      I bought it quick simply because I had been waiting for one ever since I got MSFS, and it's served me well. I am however gonna snag this if it's available on Xbox...m

  • @Kolinski_s21
    @Kolinski_s21 Před měsícem +4

    This look's better then the DC design one

    • @tver
      @tver Před měsícem

      A DCS aircraft requires much more work in order to also model the sensors and weapon systems and combat damage effects.
      MILVIZ also did not model an interactive (clickable) cockpit, which Heatblur (DCS F-4E) however did.
      Furthermore the F-4J (this) and F-4E (DCS aircraft) are different variants which differ significantly both visually and in terms of systems.
      MILVIZ has not done a bad job, with regards to what is possible within MSFS, but it is of a completely different order than the effort Heatblur made with their F-4E module for DCS, which also offers a different modeling sandbox than MSFS.
      BTW, the F-14A/B for MSFS is also made by Heatblur, being based on their F-14A/B made for DCS originally.

    • @smudge0356
      @smudge0356 Před měsícem +2

      @@tver Ohh Dear! Unless I'm badly misraken, I think you REALLY misunderstood @Kolinski_s21's post.
      Don't be quite so defensive of, or aggressive about, your "precious", ... a.k.a. _ D... C... S... {triumphant fanfare plays, whilst peasants bow, scrape & grovel in awe!}. 🙇🏼‍♀🙇🏼🙇🏼‍♂
      IF you had actually watched THIS VIDEO properly, then you would know that this, 'freeware' version, is NOT a Milviz 'release' for MSFS! This is only a 'Native' CONVERSION of the Milviz FSX version, of the F4, where permission was granted WITH RESTRICTIONS on functionality.
      Whereas ..., @Kolinski_s21 (like me in an earlier post), was actually referring to the, "DC DESIGN" built version of the F4, which was made specifically for MSFS, which, according to some YT video reviews, isn't too good.
      I don't know why some morons get so defensive about "their" favourite Flight Sim. Honestly, is it really THAT important to you, to let everyone know that YOU... have made the best decision and that everyone else is dumb for not doing the same.
      TBH, because we all essentially like the same thing, 'Simulated Flying' then I find it all to be, a bit of a 'Total Freak-Show', all the,... "... mine has the best flight physics...", "... mine has the best scenery & graphics...", "... mine has guns, bombs & war ...), I'll leave you to figure out who's who.
      DOES IT FU CKING MATTER?... REALLY... ?!
      Are you ALL so insecure in your life-choices that you have to squabble about such minor, insignificant bullshit, as to which GAME is best?
      May your lives always be so blessed, 'cause God-forbid, if you EVER had to make a choice with REAL consequences!

    • @Kolinski_s21
      @Kolinski_s21 Před měsícem +3

      @@tver I nerver talked about DCS. DC design made a F4 but it look terrible and it payware.

    • @Elcicikos
      @Elcicikos Před měsícem

      ​@@smudge0356Everything's all right? You are so aggressive

    • @smudge0356
      @smudge0356 Před měsícem

      @@Elcicikos Not aggressive, just a bit 'needley-towards' on a personal level. Then 'directionally-focused', on and towards certain points that bug the shite out of me, like all the...
      ... "... My sim's better than yours..." and all that old bollox.
      But aggressive, naah!

  • @thisisadebrown
    @thisisadebrown Před měsícem

    That’s not an that’s not an F4J It’s an FGR modernised Fin

    • @IntotheBlueSimulations
      @IntotheBlueSimulations  Před dnem

      Hi Ade,
      Thanks for the info, you’re indeed correct! I did wonder at the time but 1) I’m not *that* clued up on my phantoms and 2) I figured I’d just stick with the mod designation, thus making it easier for people to find.
      Cheers, all the best!

  • @scarecrow108productions7
    @scarecrow108productions7 Před měsícem

    Native conversion is fine and all. Great work. But the sounds are not so much, and are aliased to the old FSX IRIS Raptor Driver, I know it when I hear it because I fly the dang thing all the time in P3D, so I know that very sound pack in the back of my head when I hear it.
    Maybe someone could at least make some actual F-4 Phantom sounds for this conversion too in the future.

  • @anjinsanx44
    @anjinsanx44 Před měsícem

    $75 USD dcs!

    • @sargeklint7214
      @sargeklint7214 Před měsícem +1

      and worth every penny. These two are not in the slighest comparable. Check some tutorials for the Heatblur F4 in DCS and see for yourself. Edit: typo

    • @pumpkineater23
      @pumpkineater23 Před měsícem +1

      Whether it’s worth that much if subjective. Personally I would never spend that much. It’s overpriced. Around £30 - £40 is my maximum. And there are some amazing options for around that price.

  • @Galf506
    @Galf506 Před měsícem

    Last time I bought a Milviz product (Pilatus PC-6) when I asked about spin and stall characteristics their official response was "you're not supposed to do that, so it's not simulated"
    This is free, and it's the only price Milviz planes are worth. Keep that in mind. They're toys.

    • @smudge0356
      @smudge0356 Před měsícem

      Stop being such a whiny bitch!
      This aircraft is NOT a Milviz release for MSFS. It's a 'native' CONVERSION, by a third-party (a big THANK-YOU to Aviator671), who made it with Milviz/Blackbird's permission, but with limited functionality as a condition of release. But then YOU would know all this, IF you'd really watched this video properly.
      GOD!!! I just really can't stand dumbasses, who spout shite, because they have the attention span of a goldfish and belief in their own impotence (Nope! ... not a spelling mistake!) 🤣
      Anyway, WHY do we have to hear your drivel & know about your prejudicial views? Have these views, by all means, but please, keep them to yourself and DON'T spout them to us, if they don't actually ADD something positive to the conversation.
      Also, please just STOP being hateful & spiteful, in general, and instead just be thankful for the effort and generosity of your fellow simmers, who give their time and skills to bring add-ons that are this good, and FREE, to the sim world.
      Again, a huge THANKS, to Aviator671 for their effort, skill & time and also to Milviz/Blackbird for their permission in allowing the conversion.

    • @dillank3240
      @dillank3240 Před měsícem +3

      I am quite happy with their Cessna 310-R.

    • @Galf506
      @Galf506 Před měsícem

      @@dillank3240 I'd be "happy" with my PC-6 too if it didn't cost me $30. I could have bought a full fidelity DCS module for that amount of money. They look good, but anything past that? Nothing.

  • @shanefrance2158
    @shanefrance2158 Před měsícem

    thats not an F-4J by the way. How embarrassing

    • @IntotheBlueSimulations
      @IntotheBlueSimulations  Před dnem

      You’re correct, Shane: The mod is designated as an F-4J so, naturally I ended up referring to it as such (and I’m not *that* clued up on my Phantoms, that I was in any position to state otherwise).
      With regards to embarrassment - I’m not going to be losing any sleep over it haha XD
      Cheers for the info. All the best