@@staggabob his comment relates because he was referring to the maximum capacity of rockets that can be carried being 2-4 so basically saying even if he has proximity sensor he would still need to land a clear shot, and he only has 4 tries so if he misses all 4 he’s basically rendered useless
@@phillstevenson4931 not at all because this bleeds all your airspeed meaning maybe you get away from the guy behind you but what about the guys miles out who you can’t see and have already fired missiles now with no airspeed there are much better maneuvers and ways to get away and dodge in a dogfight this is the absolute worse
@@itzamobster1138 no doubt, I'm just saying if your in a position to be shot down, I wouldn't lead into the dog fight like this then again if your in a position to have to use this than you have messed up. Then again I have seen training dogfights I believe in Malaysia, where when both aircraft are at low energy states the thrust vectoring can allow you to get a shot at your opponent.
@@mr.hedado741 Yeah, which also risks your engines ingesting stuff it shouldn't have. And, you have to actually aim the nose to said aircraft, which already leads you to a collision path
Considering the missile can pull something like 20Gs in a terminal intercept, there's actually not much angular deviation to hit that huge ass plane swirling like a falling leaf. The guidance would probably predict the maneuver and course correct to detonate ahead of and destroy the plane.
@Bacon Space Program Lmao thats assuming that missile can even lock onto the plane. 😂 you wouldn't actually use this maneuver to avoid a missile IRL anyway
@@BaconSpaceProgramyea plus what he’s saying is missiles don’t make contact, they kinda blow up like a flak round even they get close enough so you can’t really “dodge” the munition
I've seen it done in Chicago at the air and water show in 2015 by an f-35b. I was on the very top of the Centennial Wheel and it looked like it did this manoeuvre maybe 500 meters away over Lake Michigan. It blew my mind and gave me goosebumps I had never seen anything close to this as the Marines had just put that fighter into service that July🤯
I don’t think it was this that it was doing. The f-35 is a single engine aircraft so it couldn’t have been doing this the only way it kinda could would be the f 35b like you said but the only reason it would be able to is because the b variant is a STOVL short take off vertical landing
@@medoche It was done in real life multiple times, and it can be done pretty accurately in the simulator. Seems like the "simulator" is not that unrealistic after all..
@@AugmentedGravity care to explain? There’s nothing that pisses me off more than know it’s all commenters that just say “no.” Like this and give no explanation at all.
This is what the F-35 Lightning II should do as well. It's lucky for what you demonstrated with the F-22 Raptor, the F-35 Lightning II now has an aircraft to rely on to be taught that move with the pilots. Keep up the good work.
Looks like the kind of maneuver that when the pilot lands he goes "...that was totally on purpose and on a completely unrelated note, I've soiled my flight suit."
Not really, you get high G forces with speeds, 300kn turns can achieve max 5 to 6g, depending on the aircraft ofcourse, high G. s can only get achieved with high speeds, most usually accomppanied by rapid decend for example in split-s manouvre, defensive spiral or a pump after a crank, LATs etc.
@@lucaskook9440 It depends on the aircraft, if you are using those redbull propeller thingys they can generate a lot of G forces with 300knots, but fighter jets are designed differently. Im not sure about F-22 but i would estimate around 5-6
the g forces would peak upon pulling up. then it would feel like an office chair spinning then the negative gs of leveling out. basically a roller coaster.
@@Kyrpex_ 5-6 g’s is still enough definitely feel it though let’s not underestimate a jet pulling to an absolute stop by putting all its surface area in the direction of travel….
Bro this guy went 300 knots, thats 555 km/h. If you were to try this in real life, not only will you die, the plane would lose its wings and combust. If you would try it with less speed you simply stall, possibly getting your aircraft stuck in a flat spin. You survive, but the aircraft is no more.
No you don’t. Rudder and split throttle will give you the yaw force required to pull this maneuver. 3D vectoring is a waste of money and a headache for ground maintenance crews. It’s only good for tricking Russian Oligarchs or USAF big wigs into spending money.
There was a similar maneuver done by the P 51. Full elevator, full bottom rudder. The propeller torque would roll the plane. Then neutralize the rudder full forward stick and recover. The P 51 would virtually disappear from a pursuing opponent. The P 51 would be 2000 feet below and behind. There is at least one case of a P 51 scoring a victory because the pilot was able to take a shot as the enemy passed.
@@jacobrichter9562 thats not a high G maneuver, a pilot who is flying a Raptor as part of an operational squadron can handle as lot more than this. In a simle high G turn you can get 3 times as many Gs as you do here. Just because it looks cool doesnt make it hard on the body.
@@jacobrichter9562 No problem mate. The general rule with most aerobatic maneuvers is that they do them relatively slowly becasue the jets are a lot more maneuverable at slow to medoum speeds than flying fast. High G sets in when you fly fast and pull the jet into a sharp turn. It does not look as cool ( well its relative ) but it is really taxing on the body even though most modern planes are limited to 9G in order to prevent overstressing the airframe and give that poor human a chance to stay in active duty longer than 2-3 years lol.
I just now noticed the vfx for that shot properly animated the vectored nozzles in. That's something you could get away with not doing in such a brief and distant shot, but they put the effort in!
The approaching AIM-9X watching me do this: Well, thank you *VERY MUCH* Edit: Missiles don't track and follow, they track and INTERCEPT by calculating where the plane will be after a given amount of time. By doing this you're just exponentially increasing your cross section and throwing away any chance of outmaneuvering the incoming missile (it will just correct it's path in a second and that would be it)
It also can be done by the Su-57 Which is the plane depicted in the film it’s a fifth gen fighter to combat the F-22 Raptor, it can actual preform the maneuver to a point that it can sometimes look like it can stop mid air and change direction which technically speaking it can because of its DFM and it’s high maneuverability the maneuver it preformed to dodge the missile actually isn’t meant for dodging missiles it’s meant to confuse and out maneuver a railing enemy and get behind them hence why it’s only used if they are using guns instead of missiles.
@@qweronot there is no useless maneuver, just different time and circumstance. it's like saying infantry line formation is useless because it is no longer working on battlefield but it worked wonderfully in musket era.
@@pablomartinez4716 no pretty much only Russian fighters can do that, they put way too much time into their mobility in their planes and the kvochur bell would only ever be so useful and you would be a lucky guy if you dodged a missile or stall onto a dogfight lol
F22 can it's just not practical at all. The maneuver just makes you a bigger even if the first missile miss. It's never really just one missile targeting you.
@@charlesowens8724 big cope right there ‘we don’t need raptors to do supermaneuvrability! its not practical at all!’ russians: alright we’ve not achieved full stealth yet but at least let’s get the most out of the airframe and see how Americans are gonna explain themselves how much uNpRacTicAl those wast abilities are
Pilot: I try the Kvochur bell. Rocket chasing him: You slowed down for me, and didn’t change your course much. Thanks mate! No pilot ever help my work so much!
@@oyo_the_marauder I’m pretty sure the F22s I don’t know what the name is for some reason I just spaced out and forgot, but were the pilots sits is rated for 14 gees. I might be mistaken, but that would make sense to make something stronger than it would need to be just in case.
@@SmolOperator oh yeah no I wouldn’t expect the wings to be OK. I would expect it to be something that you do to hopefully get yourself to be able to eject out.
As someone who has an rc f22 there is truly no limits this plane can do just because it’s the same shape it’s like a falling leaf can do everything love that plane.
@@irfanbilir7807 5-6 actually (7-8 if you count the pre-production test beds). Probably not gonna be produced from now on since they rely on western imports, a running theme with modern Russian tech. Even the T14 was found to be using French Gen-2 thermals.
Having given up such a huge amount of energy by doing this the F-14 indeed easily escapes as it continually climbs and accelerates. By the time you straighten it up and give chase the F-14 is already 5 miles away going twice as fast as you
Hire this guy for the next top gun movie fr
Frfr
Frfrfr
Frfrfrfr
Frfrfrfrfr
Rooster should be his mentor.
In reality, missile proximity sensor says thank you and goes boom.
You can only carry 2-4, real combat is not a game with unlimited ammo
@@blackheart9068 How does your comment relate to what the other guy said?
@@staggabob his comment relates because he was referring to the maximum capacity of rockets that can be carried being 2-4 so basically saying even if he has proximity sensor he would still need to land a clear shot, and he only has 4 tries so if he misses all 4 he’s basically rendered useless
@@nebulous9603 at that range though there is no missing 😂
@@nebulous9603 its about missiles. Not rockets. And the missiles have a proxy fuse. So you will just die if you do this
“I wanted to try it for myself”
*Cuts to Cessna*
Me :uses su 57
Ah yes the maneuver that puts you in the most danger for no reason
but it looks cool
Better than staying straight and level and getting shot down
@@phillstevenson4931 not at all because this bleeds all your airspeed meaning maybe you get away from the guy behind you but what about the guys miles out who you can’t see and have already fired missiles now with no airspeed there are much better maneuvers and ways to get away and dodge in a dogfight this is the absolute worse
@@Juancarlosq676 until you get an aim-120 in the canopy
@@itzamobster1138 no doubt, I'm just saying if your in a position to be shot down, I wouldn't lead into the dog fight like this then again if your in a position to have to use this than you have messed up. Then again I have seen training dogfights I believe in Malaysia, where when both aircraft are at low energy states the thrust vectoring can allow you to get a shot at your opponent.
F-22 does it irl:
Missile: thanks
During that maneuver in the movie, I would have just shot the plane for at least a second to take of its wing or something
@@mr.hedado741 You do realize your risking your own aircraft safety, right?
@@M16_Akula-III it could just be firing for a second, that’s enough bullets to damage something important
@@mr.hedado741 Yeah, which also risks your engines ingesting stuff it shouldn't have. And, you have to actually aim the nose to said aircraft, which already leads you to a collision path
@@M16_Akula-III Prolonging a dogfight also risks the safety of your aircraft.
Missiles proximity sensor: That's close enough.
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺❤
Considering the missile can pull something like 20Gs in a terminal intercept, there's actually not much angular deviation to hit that huge ass plane swirling like a falling leaf. The guidance would probably predict the maneuver and course correct to detonate ahead of and destroy the plane.
@Bacon Space Program Lmao thats assuming that missile can even lock onto the plane. 😂 you wouldn't actually use this maneuver to avoid a missile IRL anyway
A lot of 🤓 here
@@BaconSpaceProgramyea plus what he’s saying is missiles don’t make contact, they kinda blow up like a flak round even they get close enough so you can’t really “dodge” the munition
Missile: 101% Accuracy
With a 1% margin of error
I've seen it done in Chicago at the air and water show in 2015 by an f-35b. I was on the very top of the Centennial Wheel and it looked like it did this manoeuvre maybe 500 meters away over Lake Michigan. It blew my mind and gave me goosebumps I had never seen anything close to this as the Marines had just put that fighter into service that July🤯
Got a video? F-35 is a brick compared to F-22 ;)
@@unotoli f35 is a brick compared to mostly anything honestly
@@unotoli Oh you a F35 pilot? That’s awesome.what else have you flown?
I don’t think it was this that it was doing. The f-35 is a single engine aircraft so it couldn’t have been doing this the only way it kinda could would be the f 35b like you said but the only reason it would be able to is because the b variant is a STOVL short take off vertical landing
@@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa1261*F-4 has joined the chat*
Every maintainer for that aircraft right now is flipping a table and cursing this man’s existence
its made to be used
That aircraft will be lucky to ever fly again afterwards 😂
It's a game.
@@christopherheard3686 whysat?
Why?
Damn, that looked so smooth!
You gotta say, this maneuver is Badass!
No no this maneuver is Kvochur Bell
it just makes you a bigger target tbh
@@user-fe7bo5mm1o Not really. This maneuver is meant to make the bandit overshoot, at which point you have a clear shot to his engines.
@@M16_Akula-III a bandit may overshoot, but a missile will not, so that maneuver is basically a death sentence
@@M16_Akula-III All the enemy has to do is go vertical. This maneuver is terrible, it’s only purpose is to show the jet’s capabilities at an airshow.
When 200 million dollar military jets have to compete with $20 skateboards.
RIP Anatoly kvochur. He was a aviation legend
It’s actually crazy how those jets stay together when you look at the amount of sheer force is being applied to the chassis.
There’s no damage model in this game
And it’s not that realistic for a “simulator”
@@medoche He is talking about real life my man
@@medoche 🤓 "acktually it's a simulation"
@@medoche It was done in real life multiple times, and it can be done pretty accurately in the simulator.
Seems like the "simulator" is not that unrealistic after all..
@MEDOCHE lmao get this guy on DCS, he'd cry
"Holy shit what the fuck was that?!!!" - Rooster
"That Rooster, was an SU making themselves an easy target." - Mav
Yeah, I'd love to see what would have happened if he unloaded on it with the 20mm.
@@cookiecraze1310 he is too close to shoot cuz he risks damaging his own aircraft
@@shaolinmonk447 no.
@@AugmentedGravity care to explain? There’s nothing that pisses me off more than know it’s all commenters that just say “no.” Like this and give no explanation at all.
@@williamkline6450 just no.
This is what the F-35 Lightning II should do as well. It's lucky for what you demonstrated with the F-22 Raptor, the F-35 Lightning II now has an aircraft to rely on to be taught that move with the pilots. Keep up the good work.
Holy shit what the fuck was that?
Microsoft flight simulator be like:
it was the massechout 228 from germany...
got the plane wrong for sure but something like that
Messerschmitt 262 I think
Rooster
How to get absolutely shot down in a dog fight
Looks like the kind of maneuver that when the pilot lands he goes "...that was totally on purpose and on a completely unrelated note, I've soiled my flight suit."
Might wanna febreeze the cockpit too
A wonderful broadside shot at a near stationary target. I like it.
"Planes like the Su-27 and Su-33"
The Su-57 that did it in the movie: 🥺
The G force from that maneuver must be intense
Not really, you get high G forces with speeds, 300kn turns can achieve max 5 to 6g, depending on the aircraft ofcourse, high G. s can only get achieved with high speeds, most usually accomppanied by rapid decend for example in split-s manouvre, defensive spiral or a pump after a crank, LATs etc.
@@Kyrpex_ so turning fast with 300 knots wont be a lot of Gs?
@@lucaskook9440 It depends on the aircraft, if you are using those redbull propeller thingys they can generate a lot of G forces with 300knots, but fighter jets are designed differently. Im not sure about F-22 but i would estimate around 5-6
the g forces would peak upon pulling up. then it would feel like an office chair spinning then the negative gs of leveling out. basically a roller coaster.
@@Kyrpex_ 5-6 g’s is still enough definitely feel it though let’s not underestimate a jet pulling to an absolute stop by putting all its surface area in the direction of travel….
Pilot be like💀💀
It's been done in real life so not really
@Alpaca Fluffy Make sure you didn't have Taco Bell for breakfast.
@Alpaca Fluffy …and some not fun brown stuff
Imagine doing this and spraying flares and firing your cannon at the same time. That would be very unrealistic but epic for the eyea
Bro this guy went 300 knots, thats 555 km/h. If you were to try this in real life, not only will you die, the plane would lose its wings and combust.
If you would try it with less speed you simply stall, possibly getting your aircraft stuck in a flat spin. You survive, but the aircraft is no more.
Did you feel the g's in your gaming chair?
You also need a 3D vectoring nozzle. The F-22 only has 2D...
You do not need TVC at all; Su-27 for example does not have any sort of TVC
No you don’t. Rudder and split throttle will give you the yaw force required to pull this maneuver. 3D vectoring is a waste of money and a headache for ground maintenance crews. It’s only good for tricking Russian Oligarchs or USAF big wigs into spending money.
"The f22 can do the kavashur bell."
Bud, the F22 can do anything. I'm convinced it's alien tech lol
Yeah the Su 27 are actually shit they have been horrible in Ukraine war
@@muanstore5182they destroyed the whole Ukraine
@@ramandeep007yes by crashing
@@muanstore5182 they're still deadly.
@@noaht5191 so is my grandma with a knife, so what
There was a similar maneuver done by the P 51. Full elevator, full bottom rudder. The propeller torque would roll the plane. Then neutralize the rudder full forward stick and recover. The P 51 would virtually disappear from a pursuing opponent. The P 51 would be 2000 feet below and behind. There is at least one case of a P 51 scoring a victory because the pilot was able to take a shot as the enemy passed.
And going about 100 mph slower than the guy who now has an attitude and speed advantage
When he said ”I’m going to try that for myself” I was waiting for the clip to cut to him driving to the military base
Pretty sure the whole SU family from the 27 up can do stuff like that given a skilled pilot.
Pretty good mate you're improving your skills
Now imagine trying that with the G's of pressure you're putting on your body with a maneuver like that 😂
@@jacobrichter9562 well we know people can handle it because it's been done.
@@jacobrichter9562 thats not a high G maneuver, a pilot who is flying a Raptor as part of an operational squadron can handle as lot more than this. In a simle high G turn you can get 3 times as many Gs as you do here. Just because it looks cool doesnt make it hard on the body.
@@neutchain7838 thanks for the education. 😊👍 i just assumed based off of how it looked that it would be hard on the body
@@jacobrichter9562 No problem mate. The general rule with most aerobatic maneuvers is that they do them relatively slowly becasue the jets are a lot more maneuverable at slow to medoum speeds than flying fast. High G sets in when you fly fast and pull the jet into a sharp turn. It does not look as cool ( well its relative ) but it is really taxing on the body even though most modern planes are limited to 9G in order to prevent overstressing the airframe and give that poor human a chance to stay in active duty longer than 2-3 years lol.
Bro just did a breezy flick 😂
Farrrr, I just commented that hahahaa
Bro is litteraly a pilot
W creator for going above and beyond renting out these planes to provide us with content
Then comes pilots from Ace Combat doing stall maneuvers in a tunnel
“Allow us to introduce ourselves.”
belka witchcraft
I just now noticed the vfx for that shot properly animated the vectored nozzles in. That's something you could get away with not doing in such a brief and distant shot, but they put the effort in!
The approaching AIM-9X watching me do this: Well, thank you *VERY MUCH*
Edit: Missiles don't track and follow, they track and INTERCEPT by calculating where the plane will be after a given amount of time. By doing this you're just exponentially increasing your cross section and throwing away any chance of outmaneuvering the incoming missile (it will just correct it's path in a second and that would be it)
the missile knows where it is because the missile knows where it isn't
Kvochur tried the Cobra manuveur, but he failed successfully
It also can be done by the Su-57 Which is the plane depicted in the film it’s a fifth gen fighter to combat the F-22 Raptor, it can actual preform the maneuver to a point that it can sometimes look like it can stop mid air and change direction which technically speaking it can because of its DFM and it’s high maneuverability the maneuver it preformed to dodge the missile actually isn’t meant for dodging missiles it’s meant to confuse and out maneuver a railing enemy and get behind them hence why it’s only used if they are using guns instead of missiles.
Wow useless maneuver in moder air to air combat with so little vechicles built that they can't even fly a single full squadron. So amaizing
4.5 gen you mean 😭
@@qweronot F22s and f35s have cannos for close air support and dog fighting you ding dong
@@qweronot there is no useless maneuver, just different time and circumstance. it's like saying infantry line formation is useless because it is no longer working on battlefield but it worked wonderfully in musket era.
@@amitakumaradasa6020 it is a useless manoeuvre. You become a sitting duck and will be blasted out of the air by your opponent.
sorry quick correction, i think you meant to say “the f-22 that’s model in this particular sim video game can do the kvochur”
A f22 could definitely do the kvochur
@@pablomartinez4716 no pretty much only Russian fighters can do that, they put way too much time into their mobility in their planes and the kvochur bell would only ever be so useful and you would be a lucky guy if you dodged a missile or stall onto a dogfight lol
F22 can it's just not practical at all. The maneuver just makes you a bigger even if the first missile miss. It's never really just one missile targeting you.
@Ace-Dr4x many jets can do it, but if an airforce pilot did this- they wouldn't be an airforce pilot anymore. It's incredibly dangerous and pointless
@@charlesowens8724 big cope right there ‘we don’t need raptors to do supermaneuvrability! its not practical at all!’ russians: alright we’ve not achieved full stealth yet but at least let’s get the most out of the airframe and see how Americans are gonna explain themselves how much uNpRacTicAl those wast abilities are
bro be using F-22 even though the plane was an Su-57
Ace combat players: Rookie shit there.
"And i wanna try it for myself ", for a second there i thought he was gonna climb into one of those and show us 😑
those graphics always blow my mind
Is this that Microsoft flight game?
@@ravager337 ye
@@creepermax4167 what’s the game called ?
@@justmad1058 Microsoft Flight Simulator 2
I legit thought this was ace combat for a second 🤦♂️
Imagine you are in a plane that is losing control and you see Aaron. I would keep reading my book without problem😂
Every F22 pilot: “well that’s a dumb move. I would just let the AmRamms go from 70 miles out. Then head back to base”
Now this, this is talent
omg elons son
@@Doktor_Etti no way that translates to ‘omg according to her’ 😂
@@kuhnville3145 what in the macaroni
it’s simple hand eye coordination
Nope, mfs 2020 is arcade simulatir, mot a simulatir
Pilot: I try the Kvochur bell.
Rocket chasing him: You slowed down for me, and didn’t change your course much. Thanks mate! No pilot ever help my work so much!
Hhaha... Your intelect is breathtaking.
It was about capabilities of aircraft, not about usefulnes of manouver.
@@OleDiaBole While in the first clip the rocket somehow missed the aircraft during the maneuver.
Bro screamed so loud My eardrums almost burst
This was a necessary move for my profession back in the day, on the battlefield 3
This guy should be hired by US Air Force
He'll see how fast he can knock himself out with like 14+ Gs, and that's assuming the aircraft doesn't break first 💀
@@oyo_the_marauder I’m pretty sure the F22s I don’t know what the name is for some reason I just spaced out and forgot, but were the pilots sits is rated for 14 gees. I might be mistaken, but that would make sense to make something stronger than it would need to be just in case.
To destroy the planes 🤣
@@Hellothis12157knbhb yeah but not the whole plane... The wings would either bend severely or break off completely
@@SmolOperator oh yeah no I wouldn’t expect the wings to be OK. I would expect it to be something that you do to hopefully get yourself to be able to eject out.
I would of just shook my controller in hopes to get a speed boost like in Mariokart wii
I was just out this morning in my F 18 doing this exact same maneuver.
We call it the cobra
Thats not a cobra tho
@@smolltaco5667 it’s close enough
As someone who has an rc f22 there is truly no limits this plane can do just because it’s the same shape it’s like a falling leaf can do everything love that plane.
Like an 🦅 eagle in the sky
Haven’t seen a fighter game in
Years and that’s nuts
What game is it
Interested too
@@benjaminkaric2874 it’s Microsoft flight simulator. If you want a real fighter game look at DCS World
Tell me when u guys know
What game is this?
ATC: "Wtf is he doing?!"
Pilot: "hehe, funni russian jet manuver"
F-14 with it's 8 missiles
:Bonjour
From one pilot to another, you sir are a great ace. 👍
Requires thrust vectoring
The f-22 has thrust vectoring, however it has only 2d not 3d
@SimplyHero that's my understanding too, don't modern sukhois have 3d
@@Mongoliantreecowyeah but even without 3d it’s possible
@@Mongoliantreecowyes but 3D ruins stealth
@@MaddoxLyrics the 3d tvc itself doesnt ruin stealth. it's the engine nozzle
Su-57: "He does exactly what I do!"
F22: "But better."
The f14 and f111👁👄👁
In Topgun in that scene you can actually see the vector trust going to the side. Amazing detail!!!
not sure but i think they filmed some of if not all of the movie with real aircraft. not sure im not an expert. please correct if wrong.
The su-57s and whole end battle was fake, the training was real iirc
@@user-um1np8fx3j ye nah Russia was kind enough to lend them a plane they themselves only have ~20 of.
@@irfanbilir7807 5-6 actually (7-8 if you count the pre-production test beds). Probably not gonna be produced from now on since they rely on western imports, a running theme with modern Russian tech. Even the T14 was found to be using French Gen-2 thermals.
Lol, damn dude, pulled it off 2nd try! Nice!
Good to know, I'll try this on my way to work tomorow
I tried holding my breath the whole video I almost died there😂😂
I love these two so much 😂
The movie just came out on prime video I believe so I’m gonna watch it tonight
I would love to see both dancing together in an Air Show
Seducing that pilot to chase the TicTac’s I think aliens are trying to tell us something earth has chronic halitosis
"There you go the F 22 can do it" ITS A VIDEO GAME! 😭💀
If the internet said it, it must be true. 😂
Which game is it
even a pilot with the worst aim can shot u down with guns in this maneuver
thats why nazi russian maneuvers don't work, su 57 is a trash cgi cartoon 😂😂😂
BMXers, Scooter riders, and rollerbladers: "Plane just did a flare"
Missile: what are you doing?
Plane: dance off bro
This sexy man needs to be hired for the US Air force
How strong is that jet wow! That’s the impressive part!
Su57: **fires missile at f22**
F22: NUH UH
“Physics? Never heard of them!”
That was impressive bro, I never seen anyone do this. Great Video 🙌🏾
Absolutely Beautiful!!! 😩
Need more Top Gun content bro💪
i remember doing this in project wingman once it was badass this vid made me remember it😂
Random CZcamsr celebrating his victory over stimulator
Meanwhile pilot: lol
How is your morning or afternoon?
Just woke up, so pretty good. Thank you!!
@@foxgaming2777 nice to hear that
Pretty good i got 20 win streak 11 min ago... And i hope you have a good morning or afternoon
@@kingj5350 good and thanks
Pretty alright I'm on the bus rn
that's INSANE
The su-57 just turns without the extra 360 all angels
Having given up such a huge amount of energy by doing this the F-14 indeed easily escapes as it continually climbs and accelerates. By the time you straighten it up and give chase the F-14 is already 5 miles away going twice as fast as you
Low key didn’t thing this move could be pulled off! Well done !!!!!!!
Name of that Sim? Looks awesome
Looks like MSFS
Why do I love watching these vids so much
This is what happens when the skater kid down the street grows up and joins the air force.
Having engines further apart, like on the su 27 and 33 definitely helps
WHAT GAME IS THAT 💀
That's all I'm here for 😅
I think it's Tom Clancy's HAWK 1 or 2
That's what I want to know
**insert free bird by lynyrd skynyrd**
Because a video game is totally like a real airplane in every way.
I believe it would much easier with the su 57 because of its 3d thrust vectoring. Anyways very impressive maneuver.
Wow
that voice is a good test to see if youre hungover
“Let me try it”
-Famous last words of an F22 before getting shot down by a missile
Bro I would just faint
Wow so incredible. You saw a movie and then played a game
Fricken nailed it
Literally the best part of the whole movie the dogfight was badass
Summary-Russia has god level manuverability
Not great tech
America has not great maneuverability but
God level tech
Well the f22 isn't russian
@@CHFOP-ik1vs That is what he’s saying-
Summary- If he's giving you that much plane shoot him 😂😂
Wow. Everything you just said was wrong
@@OneAngryVelociraptor what was wrong