Mechanical circuits: electronics without electricity
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 10. 2022
- Get 82% off Private Internet Access and 3 extra months free: piavpn.com/stevemould
Spintronics has mechanical resistors, inductors, transistors, diodes batteries and capacitors. When you connect them together with chains, they give a really good intuition for how circuits works.
Spintronics: upperstory.com/spintronics/
Veritasium's videos:
• The Big Misconception ...
• How Electricity Actual...
You can buy my books here:
stevemould.com/books
You can support me on Patreon and get access to the exclusive Discord:
/ stevemould
just like these amazing people:
Frank Hereford
Will Ackerly
Brendan Williams
Cameron Leigh Middleton
Matthew Cocke
Frederic Merizen
Jeremy Cole
Pavel Dubov
Lizzy and Jack
Alan Wilderland
Joel Van der loo
Glenn Watson
Doug Peterson
Paul Warelis
John Zelinka
Alnitak
Grant Hay
Heather Liu
Marshall Fitzpatrik
Lukas Biewalk
JJ Masson
Ben McIntosh
Damien Szerszinski
Twitter: / moulds
Instagram: / stevemouldscience
Facebook: / stevemouldscience
Buy nerdy maths things: mathsgear.co.uk - Věda a technologie
I wanted to make the circuit equivalent of Braess's Paradox but I'm not sure it's possible with these components. Might need to make some mods!
The sponsor is Private Internet Access: Get 82% off and 3 extra months free piavpn.com/stevemould
cool
This nigga really out here looking like Daniel Radcliffe and Steve Buschemi had a butt baby.
I backed their kickstarter, I can't wait to get mine
can you make an Astable transistor multivibrator?
cool video
That little blue link in the chains makes such a difference in comprehension of the whole model. That was an extremely smart design choice. Little visual design choices like this are what make me happy or drive me nuts with stuff I see every day.
Totally. So many times I thought "that's really well thought out"
same. but i automatically think when i encounter unmarked moving items, to dab some tippex or paint on them. or even use my cheap (sub £20 ) tachometer with one of it's reflective stickers. but the convenience built-in, can't be argued with.
@@Palmit_: "...With one of IT IS reflective stickers"?
@@HelloKittyFanMan. is that a joke? I thought unnecessarily correcting people's grammar on the internet was dealt with years ago.
@@theBestInvertebrate: "Correcting"? Where? And who are _you_ to me?
And even if your claim were somehow correct, though it's not, then: 1. why wouldn't making sense be necessary, and 2. since when should the venue type matter?
I like how this captures the "everything is a resistor" "everything is a capacitor" "everything is an inductor" aspect of electrronics.
Like yeah the 'resistor' has a load of 'resistance', but all the rotating parts do. They also all have some mass and intertia, so they all have some 'inductance', etc
Yes, good point. It's very easy to see the stray everything.
You do know that "Steve Mould" is an AI, right? You can see that quite clearly in the characteristic third AI eyebrow at minute 15.
@@wassollderscheiss33 wow! good eyeballs. I can't tell what's causing the unibrow. Any idea?
@@randal_gibbons I don't know. My only goal was to write something Robert Miles might read ;-)
@@randal_gibbons a good unibrow is mandatory for discussing FULL BRIDGE RECTIFIERS
I remember an electricity exercise in school where we compared a car shock absorber behavior with an RLC circuit and showed how with the right frequency of currents or bumps on the road, both could enter in resonance. It made me realize how every systems, mechanics, electric or chemicals are interconnected and basically about energy transfer. I still failed that class but had a nice mind blown moment :D
Yeah, same differential equations for both systems. The two systems are called Duals.
yes, basically its all about Physics, theres not such thing in nature as Chemistry thats an artificial construct by man. Like there's no such thing that 2 dimensional object everything has at least 3 dimensions, 2D is for exemplifications only.
@@ShiningForce07physics is also a construct by man, and maths is at the core of that. you can't reduce a discipline without adequate knowledge of it beforehand
A shock absorber is a frequency damper, its electrical equavelant is a capacitor...it smooths out the back emf oscillation in switching currents as to reduce arcing at switch contacts.
I've long thought of Inductors as "spinning up" like a flywheel, just to keep straight how they work in my head. It's really neat to see them make that analogy into reality.
😂😂😂 "the Veritasium shaped elephant in the room" and later the unibrow (ElectroBoom) joke when talking about the FULL BRIDGE RECTIFIER. 😂 It was epic! The end segment was remined me of Alan Turing's mechanical computer (which broke the Enigma and helped to win WW2).
Yeah, hahahahha!!! this video was soo good!
(this should be a video that teachers can show to their students (or vice versa).)
You spelled it wrong, mate. It should be FULL BRIDGE RECTIFIER!!!
Actually, it wasn't Turing's, but he indeed upgraded it and pushed to its limits. What is funny, is that something like 100 years earlier Charles Babbage invented a mechanical computer, but never got it done.
ah that's what the unibrow was for! I was very confused
The FULL BRIDGE RECTIFIER made me crack up, didn't see that coming
Had me laughing like a a madman at "full bridge rectifier". Thanks for the video. Great content, as always!
The newest make-up craze will be the Full Bridge Rectifier, to make everyone look like Bert from Sesame Street, right?
+1 on that from me! 👍 Took half a second of "whats with he's..." Thats a great reference!
ElectroBOOM!
Same! I guess talking about a full bridge rectifier requires a monobrow.
That had me rewinding to check he didn't have that on the whole time
I just gave it to my 8year old son as a christmas present. And we both found it very cool to play with, and I as a electrical Engineer found it very intuitve and thought to my self that it must be possible to build a computer with enough ressources with all of that.
Well. Now youtube recommend me your video and you just have done the basics for that.
Great Job, great video!
Just be sure not to use a cheap chain like that, or you might get a system error. A rubber band for wind-up motor shmafety?
im pretty sure mechanical computers exist and did develop for a time but they went out of fashion since electronics were cheaper to produce and more efficient
I am incredibly late to this, but I wanted to mention how impressive I find these. I feel as if these could significantly lower the age at which children could learn about circuits, and perhaps just as importantly they can make learning about them fun.
I've never clicked so fast. A physical description of an invisible process. Loved the breakdown!
Another cool analogy is: You can take everything that was done here and replace the chains with oil lines, and have all the same logic applied hydraulically, or even pneumatically with pressure instead of voltage. The interesting dynamic of how it applies force to a motor for example: electrically you can spin a motor magnetically, where as hydraulic/ pneumatical systems can spin a motor kinetically. Electricity has volts/ current/ resistance, where as fluids have pressure/ flow/ volume, volume has length/ width/ height, a Kinetic system has mass/ velocity/ inertia, a magnetic systems has attraction/ repel/ conduction, a thermal system has temperature/ pressure/ conduction, a mechanical system has torque/ velocity/ friction, friction has pressure/ temperature/ velocity, states of matter have solid/ liquid/ gas, time has past/ present/ future, space has length/ width/ height, velocity has distance/ time/ vector (direction)... on and on; It's easy to see how many of these qualities overlap and how many systems shake hands with each other-- and that's without even stepping into chemical and nuclear interactions. The shear complexity of what is possible within the laws of physics with only a finite amount of elements, is literally brain melting when you try to think about it deeply.;
@Infinity What can I say, I enjoy a good video!
One thing i absolutely love about this is its appearance. It's not some basic colors and simple flat shapes with sans serif text; the colors are metallic and blend well together, the pieces all have etched patterns in them, and the text matches. This is such an elegant, almost Victorian like toy
The aesthetics of this thing are all brilliant. Really smart industrial design was put into the whole package.
thats why it costs $100 for one set haha
@@LKonstantina915 I think it can be target to teachers and schools as a cool demo, so the cost is more affordable to them
@@srpenguinbr teachers get shit pay man and they'd prolly need multiple sets. I don't think many of them would want to drop several hundred on this
@@downsonjerome7905 you know teachers dont have to pay for the props and teaching materials out of pocket right? The school would cover that if it was a teaching aid.
This is amazing! I have always found helpful the mechanical analogies as they helped me in the beginning to get a feeling for electronics but the fact that you can build and feel it makes it so much more intuitive! Awesome content!
This brings back a lot of memories. When I studied systems modeling in the 1990s I got carried away with Bond Graphs which abstract the domain using flow and effort variables, and allow you to implement a system design in electronics, mechanics, fluidics, or other domains that have analog component equations.
It was "fun" translating different systems to see what it would look like. If you want to get intuition about this stuff, I highly recommend bond graphs.
The Electroboom reference when you discussed the full bridge rectifier really got me going. Overall this was a nifty demonstration!
14:58 lmao good one (it should be illegal to comment without timestamp)
Literally laughed out loud; I love the loving punchy vibe in the CZcams science community.
you mean the FUUUUUUULL BRIDGE RECTIFIEEEEEER!!!!! LOOOOL
Yep that FULL BRIDGE MONOBROW really got me.
I thought it was a video artifact at first! I went back a couple of times to make sure it was really there. ;)
This is when you realise how clever the Engineers were during the Steam era. This is what they used to regulate pressures etc.
did they tho
Bruh they regulated pressures through a combination of relief valves which are automatic, sometimes steam whistles which are manual and by putting less fuel in the firebox when u want pressure to go down and more when you want it to go up but they did not use these.
@@oliverkrohn8309 bro thought steampunk was real ☠☠
@@snez3538 bro's study on mac dolands
It's not how clever engineers were yesterday, it's how stupid engineers are today.
First thing that came to my mind with inductor was dampers or a flywheel on a car. Also loved the little easteregg with full bridge rectifier. With your demo I understood how it works way better.
The rectifier part is too good. So subtle, well played LOL
I’m a mechanical engineer that designs ECU’s so this is a great crossing of world’s. Fantastic video, I too appreciate a good analogy.
Steampunk entusiasts could easily take this idea and make a basic, real, steampunk computer. Maybe they'd need to scale it down somehow to make it practical but still. It'd be amazing.
just needs a wind up every now and then.
@@dog-ez2nu isn't that where you place a steam engine instead of the manual winder?
Isn't that just a differential analyser
@@Zenovarse I believe the mechanism in that machine was different but insofar as they would both be mechanical computation machines yes, very much.
@@dog-ez2nu Or perhaps, as its steampunk, a steam engine. Could be the "battery" or sorts. Perhaps in this miniturised version a small steam turbine would suffice. Could also be a cool plot device that if steam pressure drops or the turbine is damaged in some way you end up with limited power, both spin volts and spin amps would be reduced. Which could result in reduced performance, slower computation, but also perhaps increased number of errors for circuits that require a certain range of timing to work.
I had an A-Level physics teacher who told me that if you were to have a 100% accurate model of something, then you would just have the thing itself. All diagrams, models, descriptions, analogies, abstractions etc. are going to have some level of imperfection about them because they are not the thing they are trying to explain, but in many cases that's exactly why they are helpful tools in allowing our meaty skull-contents to gain some understanding :)
A common saying is "The map is not the territory." Every map is useful for something, and not useful for most everything else.
In Statistics, the phrase is: “All models are wrong; some are useful.”
Credit to George Box for that one.
I came to that same conclusion a while ago about the universe. The truth is just the universe itself, and we are fragments of it experiencing.
Sometimes the thing itself is not even a 100% accurate model of all such things, due to natural variance. So, say you had a complete model of the human body, which would just be a human body, that could only be a single human body, which is not a complete model for every human body. So how could you ever get a complete model of every human body when each one is slightly different? Here, a model which is actually abstracted from the thing itself (the human body) could be more accurate in representing the totality of human bodies.
This is making me think of the Platonic Realm of Forms.
@@Bayonet1809 Only the thing itself is a model of the thing itself, not other things, even very similar ones. Becuase, yes, your body and my body are quite different.
That was excellent. Been trying to get my head around what electricity is and how it works for ages. Definitely getting a spintronic. Thanks 👊🏽
Aliens that haven’t discovered electronics and hear Humans using their mechanical circuits as analogies: 👁️👄👁️
I want to say two things; 1) Great video! I would love to play around with one of those kits.
2) I saw what you did @ ~15:00 with the sight gag about full bridge rectifiers, and I fully appreciated it. I just didn't want you to think your efforts went unnoticed.
Mehdi would be proud 🤣
I was SHOOK when I saw that 😂😂😂
fascinating how our brains immediately notice that something is off...its just one second or so.
Noticed that too. Could've used a bit of reverb but I guess he wanted to keep it subtle.
Ah, I'm so glad you mentioned that! I really didn't know what to think about "the monobrow"...
14:57 he just had to pull out the unibrow for the full bridge rectifier!
Made me think of ElectroBOOM.
@@ArturdeSousaRocha Thanks. I noticed it and it was sooooo familiar but I had to check the comments for the light to come on. Thanks so much.
I laughed so hard on that
did you see this man in your dreams?
Actually that thing scared me 😅
He suddenly appears with unibrow but ignores it, like in some creepy videos where all seem to be usual but you know that something off.
I'm a graduated EE and I still had trouble wrapping my head around how inductors work in a circuit, but not anymore after this video! I wish these kind of demonstrations were available in university circuit analysis 1 classes. It would make understanding the components and Kirchoff's laws so much easier.
i was so confused as to weather i should take mechanical branch for my ug course thanks for making it clear . this is pure beauty. i have adhd and this is the only video i could watch over and over without getting bored and still learn something new. thankyou so much
Loved the uni-brow during the full bridge rectifier 😂😂
Paul Boswell, the creator, is an AMAZING guy who also did a mechanical computer, “Turing Tumble”-I could not recommend his work more highly. Thanks for giving him some well-deserved publicity.
"Turing Tumble" is a copy of "Digi-Comp II" from the 1960s by John Godfrey.
111,1+1th
You can imagine how brilliant this Spintronics thing is, when a third-party youtuber is making a (nonsponsored)video on it!
👍 Absolutely brilliant! But I think they should reconsider using stamped anodized aluminum pieces (gears) instead of plastic and design a better drive than the chain they have now.
Considering he made that simulator free and open source, he deserves it.
so many pieces fell in place watching this video, thank you! this was brilliant!!
This helped me finally go from knowledge to understanding of capacitors being used to protect inductors like in electrical motors.
oh my god what a golden idea. the creativity that went onto building the components as gear mechanisms and getting them to work together is nothing short of amazing.
Another cool analogy is: You can take everything that was done here and replace the chains with oil lines, and have all the same logic applied hydraulically, or even pneumatically with pressure instead of voltage. The interesting dynamic of how it applies force to a motor for example: electrically you can spin a motor magnetically, where as hydraulic/ pneumatical systems can spin a motor kinetically. Electricity has volts/ current/ resistance, where as fluids have pressure/ flow/ volume, volume has length/ width/ height, a Kinetic system has mass/ velocity/ inertia, a magnetic systems has attraction/ repel/ conduction, a thermal system has temperature/ pressure/ conduction, a mechanical system has torque/ velocity/ friction, friction has pressure/ temperature/ velocity, states of matter have solid/ liquid/ gas, time has past/ present/ future, space has length/ width/ height, velocity has distance/ time/ vector (direction)... on and on; It's easy to see how many of these qualities overlap and how many systems shake hands with each other-- and that's without even stepping into chemical and nuclear interactions. The shear complexity of what is possible within the laws of physics with only a finite amount of elements, is literally brain melting when you try to think about it deeply. .. ;
So naive. Electronic circuits were derived from mechanical devices. Do some reading.
lego technic needs to buy this company or at least access to their IP
@@alveolate There wouldn't be any IP protection when it comes to the basic components themselves. Spintronics itself is derivative work of concepts that exist in the public domain, you can't patent a sprocket or chain, nor one-way mechanisms such as clutch bearings and ratchets, etc. The only IP protection would be the book that goes along with the set under copyright, and how the set itself is modeled as you can't make a 1:1 reproduction. What use Lego would get out of these kinds of components are not covered by IP protection.
Plus there's the blatantly obvious issue that these kinds of gearsets would have an insane amount of frictional losses if they didn't have bearings. Technic will never have bearings for quite obvious reasons. While it might be a decent idea, it just would not work in practice. Plus there's too many issues with how Spintronics approaches certain concepts, which results in bad analogies, something Lego would probably avoid when it comes to educational building systems.
The Mehdi mini-cameo almost made me spit coffee on the monitor. That was brilliant!
You won my heart with your discussion of models.
Wow, this is beautiful! Thank you for sharing this excellent analogy!
I really appreciate you for making this analogy between electrical and mechanical systems. It really helps me better understand Control systems.
Same. Really cool video ❤
Well, he presented it but it looks like you can get your own set of models to try out too!
Fun fact: the concept you covered in your paper is actually the basis for the circuit that makes up the kick drum sound in the Roland TR-808 (an electronic drum machine know for being featured in every rap song ever made). The circuit is called a Bridged T-Network.
@Repent and believe in Jesus Christ forgive me father for I have sinned.
Sorry daddy, I've been naughty.
And almost all EDMs too... :)
@Repent and believe in Jesus Christ I feel like god needs to repent to me, tbh.
I am an electrical and electronics engineer, a physics teacher and a musician and music producer ( 808 is🤘), so the joy i got from watching the video and then this comment of yours. Oh my Krishna! what a blissful start of the day. Thanks to all the knowledge sharers (my day is made) ❤
@@shoumeekbose4662 Sigproc4life!
7:49
This is absolutely brilliant ! Beautiful !
This is the best CZcams movie I have seen in a while and I've been around, guys. Thank you!
At university, learning control theory, we analyzed electrical circuits and mechanical systems using transfer functions and a popular exercise was to make an analogous mechanical configuration to a given circuit and vice versa. This is exactly this. The resistors are friction elements, capacitors springs, inductors masses, voltage a force and current speed. I really loved these similarities, as they give you an additional insight on how everything works.
I did have the same subject, good times back then
It's the same thing because they share the same models/equations. Still in some areas (like thermal), they miss some components. Dynamic systems are everywhere in nature but some models (like transfer functions) are impossible
Sounds like you had a good control theory prof, must have been nice! Mine really wasn't so great 😕
Force voltage analogy , force current analogy
Sound like Ogata's "system dynamic " book 😂
The "transistor" piece is voltage controlled, so it's actually more similar to an FET rather than a "basic" BJT transistor, which is current controlled.
Was litearlly just thinking that, its a nice set but really it dosnt work for the more advanced compnents in electronics.
What would happen if someone was to pass a 12V current through a fart?
@@PSYCHIC_PSYCHO a what? Lol
@@ortzinator How many nuclear-warheads would it take to obliterate a fart? 🤪
Spintronics webpage clarifies it behaves like a FET
An interesting thing about this is that you also get some of the parasitics with the ideal components. Things have friction, so there's resistance, and then there's also parasitic inductance in the inertia in the chains and the wheels. And probably also there's parasitic capacitance in components as the plastic flexes and acts like a spring.
A lot of great definitions explained very well, great video
A 555 timer might be simple enough to build in spintronics, and would probably be spectacular to look at.
there's 28 transistors and 11 resistors so it'd have to be simulated probably.
@@satibel A 741 op amp would be easier. The resistor count drops to 20! (So still too complex to make cheaply!)
@@stevelknievel4183 any kind of operational amplifier would be great. To see it in action would make those winky foxes more understandable
My vote too!
Just realised I forgot a capacitor.
The subtle ElectroBOOM reference killed me. Incredible video as always!
This is amazing! It makes so many things I've studied much more concrete.
i´ve never seen a water-model in my head before. Thanks for showing this, its amazing how easy it is.
The full bridge rectifier was pretty impressive to see work, not to say the flip flop! I’d love to see some logic circuit being built on that, not just a gate. I’m in sheer disbelief of how great looking this project looks! Great video!
*F U L L*
*B R I D G E*
*R E C T I F I E R*
The eyebrow was the most impressive part of the rectifier.
Why did he do the mono-brow thing?
Probably can use mechanical devices for some of the logic gates AND, OR, XOR, NOT, NAND, NOR, and XNOR
The monobrow was the cherry on top
I LOVE that you mentioned the Veritasium video because the biggest problem with analogies is that they're fundamentally incorrect in many ways. However, simplified models have proven useful many times over for solving problems intuitively while ignoring lots of extraneous details (frictionless surfaces, anyone?). Appreciate you touching on both sides of the equation. :)
Yeah, analogies help us feel more familiar with the actual works under the hood, while at the same time, getting some work done. They're not actual explanations of how reality actually works, but may be close enough to get our work done.
Actually, I doubt we'll ever be able to really understand reality. It's too far beyond our capacity. All we'll ever have is closer, and closer, and closer, analogies... But the real truth will be hidden from us forever
@@zzzxhrg A meta-analogy seems in order. Maps are getting closer and closer to the territory, but the map can never be identical to the territory.
Moire patterns in graphene lattice are analogous to sub-atomic phenomenon as well. This is mysterious. It seems it can help us to model some interactions, and maybe learn new things about sub-atomic particles, but we don't know if they're a perfect analogy or not.
I mean… did you think that anybody likely to be watching this video would be unaware that analogies are imperfect reflections of their subject? The only perfect reflection of a thing is the thing itself.
@@zzzxhrg Yes, words themselves are explained by other words which are explained by other words. We're always trying to explain what we mean, or what something means, because absolute truth is difficult when words cannot do what is required.
I get a chuckle out of listening to Jordan Peterson stringing together sentences of $10 words, trying to explain his ideas in the most appropriate language.
Analogies are meant to convey information so the average can get some mental picture of what's going on. I use the "water in a garden hose" analogy to explain to people the properties of amperage and voltage. Most people don't know the difference. When I explain amperage is the number (amount) of flowing electrons and the voltage is the pressure behind those electrons, it clicks with them. Of course it's flawed but it conveys a message and gives a mental picture nature of electricity.
Just loved when you said that "we know that Quantum Mechanics is wrong" because that's exactly the opposite of what basically every physicist would say, they almost invariably say "we know that General Relativity is wrong... because it's not quantized".
I also sit on the side of the fence where it seems that QM is wronger than GR, even if this one might need quantization at the limit of (maybe) Plank scale volume-time (which is so extremely tiny that it's almost indistinct from seamless anyhow).
This was more helpful than i expected. Ill admit its got its own learning curve to understand the analogy and im sure is far more helpful if youre using the pieces yourself, but inductance and capacitance both are things ive struggled to really grasp. I understand the descriptions of them but struggle with having a good full understanding of them. This demonstration helped a bit with both. Specifically the filtering part. For me, my interest in electronics has been mostly tube guitar amps and while ive built several, theres always so much missing information or misunderstood information since ive had no formal training.
Id be very curious to see different portions of a simple guitar amplifier circuit built with this.
That fact that since high-school you have been explaining science with hydraulic systems is extremely wholesome, I love your videos:)
I'm amazed at how accurate it is just on principle, even passive inductance just works because the fundamentals are so accurate. It's crazy
Second order linear differential equations are going to do what second order linear differential equations do, no matter the medium.
Excellent, a very good place to learn Mechatronics, keep it up and all the best..
Magnificent video sir.Please more videos on spintronics.
I'm an electrical engineer and at uni we studied mechanical circuits as analogies of electronic circuits, since that was what we were more familiar with. E.g. a mass-spring circuit could be modeled as a LC circuit. A force would translate to a voltage supply, and so on.
We also modeled some hydraulic stuff with electrical circuits equivalents, e.g. a water tank could be considered a capacitor.
I was confused about water tank being considered a capacitor, but I guess if you're filling it from the bottom then the analogy holds. idk why that took me so long to realize
I was lucky enough to do a GCSE course called "systems and control", which was half pneumatics and half electronics, and it was really interesting to see how you could do the same things in both, and even mix them together.
In the same way as you can make a crude timer with a capacitor and a resistor, you can do the same thing with a reservoir and a valve, for example.
Im a biomedical engineer and we had a course where we learned to model mechanical fluid and biomechanical systems as circuits and differential equations
Funny … I had no issues understanding LC circuits but still struggle with mass-spring circuits 😂
Yes. Those spinning things in the video just makes my head hurt, while the electric circuits are perfectly understandable.
When I was in 3rd year of university studying software engineering I took a course as an elective with a very misleading title of "Systems and Simulations" I went into it thinking we would be learning how to design and program simulations on a computer. It turned out to be a course geared for electrical and mechanical engineers. We learned about this exact thing using electrical systems to simulate mechanical systems and vice versa and it blew my mind despite never actually being able to apply this in my field and it really helped me really understand the power of the math I was forced to learn in first and second year in a less abstract way that those courses weren't able to do.
We did the same, I took it 3rd or 4th year of my EE degree program IIRC.
Next, take a writing class, so I don't run out of breath reading your work....don't take this comment wrong, I'm not being mean.....The fact I have to apply a disclaimer shows just how misunderstood the internet has become or can become when people are reading other people's writings as they tend to take them the wrong way therefore giving the reader a bad taste in their mouth and this ultimately creates a hostile environment to where two people now become enemies and this will usually bring in other posters who either feel the need to defend the OPs comment against the commenter or stand with the opposing side and this will create a back and forth between two or more strangers who by the time they are done reading will find themselves completely out of breath and nothing accomplished but that's not this I just found myself out if breath reading your comment and seeing that you went to university figured you might look at a writing class as you probably write a lot in your field of choice at least I think you would......Breathe....anyways just having a little fun at the expense of others.
the power of math, fastai
@@jvon3885 if I could like this a dozen times, I would.
@@jvon3885 just take a breath it's not that hard
Watching this while working on Circuits homework. Really cool stuff, I need to tell my professor about these.
Brilliant idea and working pieces too.
I love this! And also the cheeky electrboom reference with full bridge rectifiers :)
The Mehdi eyebrow during the Full Bridge Rectifier bit made me do a spit-take
I sure wish that these were the toys given with a happy meal as I was growing up! These are absolutely brilliant!
11:43 I play the synthesizer, and its so neat to see what a very simple high pass filter *actually* looks like. With all my fiddling with analog synths, i never stopped to think about how a high pass filter worked.
And as a cherry on top, the next thing you showed was an oscillator, which i also didnt have a good idea of mechanically, even though its. Yanno. *The thing that makes the sound* loI
Just further goes to show me that i need to learn more about circuits to actually understand how to shape sounds exactly how i want to, and this is a brilliant tool to help with that!
I would love to see a series (pun intended) about each of the commonly used logic gates represented with spintronics.
Makes me feel like a Turing complete wall clock might actually be possible.
this technically means a mechanical computer is possible, (although too big to be of use) it still would be amazing to see it
@@he3004 been built before, would be cool to see them in spintronics though
@@he3004 i think the ones who created spintronics also created a mechanical turing machine
The original automatic computer was a mechanical computer.
@@he3004 Charles Babbage built several mechanical computers in 18xx.
I have literally never understood LC circuits until 8:42, and it suddenly completely clicked. Thank you so much for this Steve, this is one of your best videos so far!
Just started with electronic circuits at school, this is awesome
I often teach people basic electronics using mechanics to describe how some circuits or components work. Some of the Spintronics stuff is just fun to watch or things are done in slightly different ways from the descriptions I use which makes them even more interesting.
My favourite comparison is hybrid transformers or magic-T waveguide which works the same as a differential. I see varieties of these things almost everywhere and used in all kinds of things.
There is one thing I'd love to see you try with spintronics is a negative resistance device.
The typical example in electronics is a Tunnel Diode.
As you will be aware the negative resistance is more of a behaviour of the device than an actual real world resistive value.
As we increase the voltage across a resistor, the current flowing through it also proportionally increases.
In a negative resistance device, at a certain voltage, a further increase in voltage causes a decrease in current.
This of course does not continue forever and at some higher voltage the differential current will return to a positive value.
It might be interesting to explore some other non-linear mechanics to see what unusual behaviours can be generated.
Loved the Mehdi costume for the full bridge rectifier!
FULL BRIDGE EYEBROW
So nice that Mehdi was willing to appear in your video!
for those that missed it, it's at 14:57 or here czcams.com/video/QrkiJZKJfpY/video.html
I was searching for this comment
the univrow was great but he should have shouted FFOOOOOOOLLL BRIDGE RECTIFIIIERRRR!!!!
@@goldfishdoc1999 would have been too obvious. Loved the subtly of how he did it. :)
Really enjoyed this! Would've been a great way of inuititing electrical circuits as a visual thinker. I'm glad to know I can still learn to build simple computers using this form of reasoning.
14:58 That electroboom reference couldn't get any better
Epic nod to Electroboom. :) Edit : A circuit suggestion: basic h-bridge motor controller. (As seen in under 5v circuits via transistors) Seems ironic to simulate a circuit designed to control rotations via an emulation of electronics done *VIA* rotations.
meta spintronics
😂 came to find this, I was so distracted by the brow until he said full bridge rectifier 😭😭
I once went through a book of switchmode regulator topologies and mapped how they could all be applied in mechanical gearboxes using springs, flywheels and clutches. Personally I relate current to torque and voltage to angular velocity which just means you swap inductors and capacitors in these examples and has the benefit of mapping perfectly to permanent magnet dc motors voltage and current characteristics.
I've never heard of spintronics but my area of concentration in mechanical engineering is Mechatronics. What you show here is only scratching the surface of system dynamics, which is a study in engineering that mathematically represents electrical, mechanical (translational and rotational), fluid and thermal systems with the same math. There are mathematical equivalences between all of these domains. Just as there are between magnetic fields, gravitational fields and electrostatic fields. I made these connections early on in my physics studies and was excited to see it all tied together in the system dynamics approach, which is the foundation of Mechatronics.
This model is so much more intuitive than anything my college professors have ever taught so many details that took so long to understand all packed into a set.
The uni-brow at around 14:57 to coincide with the full bridge rectifier segment is Python-esque and I'm here for it.
Python2 or Python3 though?
I love this man! I have solved poly rythms, and your analogy was mine before finding de mathematical formula for Swing.. that is your 3 masses showing the product of a binari string dent by dent mechanism... this is love ❤
This is a very neat science and technology toy. Good for both teaching, and experimentation.
This is such a crazy eccentric idea, and I like the steampunk style of it too. I think it's also a useful bridge between electronics analogy and mechanical design.
Wonderful, insightful video!
I didn't even think about how this would fit so amazingly into steampunk. Thanks for the insight!
That mehdi cameo was unexpected lol. I always love these little surprises you put in your videos!
I felt like I was taking crazy pills that no one else was commenting on it, until I saw your post!
AMAZING! That's the right way to learn electronics or anything in life. Thank you God bless you.
You gave me the answer to an old self question about what happened to energy when you conect a charged capacitor in parallel with a dischargedone!! Nobody did it in my life before!
Steve I thank you a lot!! 😃
People with the same lack of knowledge like me, see at 12:55
I love how different physical concepts describe each other. Really makes you think about what determines the rules of our universe and their similarities across materials.
Lots of things in physics, electronics, economics, biology, science in general, can be described with linear dynamical systems. Even more things can be described by non linear dynamical systems. Understanding these systems makes you extremely powerful.
The eyebrow @15:03 kills me
Same😂 electroboom moment
¡Gracias! Keep doing what you are doing
Bravo, nice information, it is fun to know someone develop this !
This is beautiful. One of the things I have trouble explaining to people without a lot of immersion in physics but who need this for their work exams is exactly high pass and low pass filters. They cannot "visualize" it. I am really thinking of getting this for that purpose
Yeah, I had to do an experiment in Uni where we built a high-pass filter and I really didn't get how tf it worked, but this here is much more grounded (no pun intended) and easier to understand.
I've been imagining something like this for over a decade and always wondered if I could make money by inventing it. Someone beat me to the punch but regardless, this is so sick I couldn't stop smiling throughout the entire video. It's like a dream. Pure glee!
The genius is not always in the idea, sometimes the genius is in how to turn the idea into a viable product
Another cool analogy is: You can take everything that was done here and replace the chains with oil lines, and have all the same logic applied hydraulically, or even pneumatically with pressure instead of voltage. The interesting dynamic of how it applies force to a motor for example: electrically you can spin a motor magnetically, where as hydraulic/ pneumatical systems can spin a motor kinetically. Electricity has volts/ current/ resistance, where as fluids have pressure/ flow/ volume, volume has length/ width/ height, a Kinetic system has mass/ velocity/ inertia, a magnetic systems has attraction/ repel/ conduction, a thermal system has temperature/ pressure/ conduction, a mechanical system has torque/ velocity/ friction, friction has pressure/ temperature/ velocity, states of matter have solid/ liquid/ gas, time has past/ present/ future, space has length/ width/ height, velocity has distance/ time/ vector (direction)... on and on; It's easy to see how many of these qualities overlap and how many systems shake hands with each other-- and that's without even stepping into chemical and nuclear interactions. The shear complexity of what is possible within the laws of physics with only a finite amount of elements, is literally brain melting when you try to think about it deeply.''
@@caiocc12 Also talent is not something innate. It's hard work and determination to keep doing and perfecting and adapting and perseverance until reaching the goal.
That's what genius and talent is to me.
It's determination and perseverance and hard work.
I see determination, perseverance and hard work in these spintronic. That's why i'd say product is genius and people who made it were talented.
Very same applies to this YT channel!
This is amazing, whoever designed this deserves an award
My eleven year old is currently using this kit to build his first circuit “puzzle.” So far, so good. He loves puzzle games and wants to be an engineer of some kind when he grows up, but he’s not sure what kind. We’ll see if electrical engineering or mechanical engineering is his thing. Thanks for this overview. Anything that can get my school-averse kid to actually have fun while learning something new and using his natural curiosity and problem-solving skills with enthusiasm is awesome.
I forgot how fun this stuff was. It's been years since my elec tech classes, but I still get a little thrill seeing some of the stuff I learned there. It's honestly surprising how much joy I got the first time I got an led to turn on with a bread board.
Hope this video led you to try it again
Another cool analogy is: You can take everything that was done here and replace the chains with oil lines, and have all the same logic applied hydraulically, or even pneumatically with pressure instead of voltage. The interesting dynamic of how it applies force to a motor for example: electrically you can spin a motor magnetically, where as hydraulic/ pneumatical systems can spin a motor kinetically. Electricity has volts/ current/ resistance, where as fluids have pressure/ flow/ volume, volume has length/ width/ height, a Kinetic system has mass/ velocity/ inertia, a magnetic systems has attraction/ repel/ conduction, a thermal system has temperature/ pressure/ conduction, a mechanical system has torque/ velocity/ friction, friction has pressure/ temperature/ velocity, states of matter have solid/ liquid/ gas, time has past/ present/ future, space has length/ width/ height, velocity has distance/ time/ vector (direction)... on and on; It's easy to see how many of these qualities overlap and how many systems shake hands with each other-- and that's without even stepping into chemical and nuclear interactions. The shear complexity of what is possible within the laws of physics with only a finite amount of elements, is literally brain melting when you try to think about it deeply....
Very cool kit, seems like a great learning tool. I especially liked the representation of an inductor as a flywheel, had never thought of it like that before and it makes a lot of sense.
I would've loved this as a kid. I finally understand the FULL BRIDGE RECTIFIER.
Holy hell, the monobrow out of nowhere was pure genius. Electroboom would no doubt be honoured.
I probably would've pursued electrical engineering if I played with something like this as a kid. This and a voltmeter. I used to disassemble and reassemble my toys as a kid, but I could never understand how the electronics worked inside them. Knowing which was what and why the things were used the way they did would have been really nice growing up. The farthest I ever understood electronics back then was that there was positive and ground.
When I was a kid we had these 300-in-1 or 500-in-1 electronics boards where you could make hundreds of different electronic devices and experiments with all the supplied components that stuck into a big breadboard but they were very clever and designed for kids to be able to easily make electronic circuits. Of course back then RadioShack had a section in the back of the store with shelves of every electronic component that you'd want and anything else you'd need so I started making my own things, mainly trying to make my own synthesizers, a solid state guitar amplifier and distortion pedals but even with such an interest in electronics I moved on. We just don't normally take an interest we have as a kid and carry it into a career in adulthood.
Same. I used to disassemble and hopefully reassemble all my toys. I wanted to know how they "tick"
i think many kids did that. thing is theres more to it than i would have thought back then... mechanical stuff is much more understandable at a low level imo
Well this spintronic confuse me even more about how i though electricity worked i prefer the analogy of water going through pipes
I'm just so impressed with this kit! Not gonna buy one (probably), but it seem just amazing to me. The ingenuity, the amount of cleaverness and engineering needed to come up and make all these components, the attention to detail. Just wow!
Every time you showed another component I was like "No way! That's incredible!".
The great thing is there's a browser based simulation on their website. It has a problem with floating point accuracy when dealing with circuits that spin really slowly, which can cause perpetual motion, but otherwise it's fun to play around with once you understand the concept
Incredible analogy.
THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST INNOVATIVE AND GENIUS PHYSICAL APPLICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL THEORY AND MECHANICS THAT EXISTS. GENIUS! This is absolutely brilliant. I suffered through Robotics and Embedded Systems degrees with the massive learning curve it takes to learn and understand these concepts and laws. I am a 100% visual learner and this would have helped me tremendously back then. I've already placed my purchase. Every kid is getting this for birthdays and Christmas now!
As an electronic engineer who spend several years learning how to model any physical system as an electric circuit, seen the oposite approach has been really enjoyable
This is so incredibly fascinating, and I'd love to play around with this type of stuff. Even just by this video, I feel I got a way better idea of how circuits work! The engineering behind this is so cool!
Thanks @SteveMould.
As a math and science teacher, and a former EE, I think it’s super-important to voice caution with conceptual analogies. Simultaneously I want to redirect people to the mathematics. Most analogies break down. They are like scaffolding in construction or splints and crutches in orthopedics (to give two analogies); simplified aids to understanding totally unsuited to full service. Water and spintronics may HELP people wrap their minds around electrical ideas initially, but it’s important to avoid being sucked too deeply into these particular conceptual holes. They are bottomless (and the depths are filled with meaninglessness). Learn the math, then try to state the implications. In time circuits become obvious. Trying to visualize all the fields may be beyond human capacity, but the math is not. Math is terrible and beautiful in this way: we can discover USEFUL things that our senses and our imaginations will never visualize, analogize or simplify. Such things cognitively reside part-way into the realms of magic, fantasy and science fiction AND YET THEY ARE REAL. In a fundamental sense, then, the math is more “real” than the thoughts of those using it. That’s both weird and wonderful!