How the new priesthood shows the Law of Moses is no longer in effect
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 07. 2024
- Torah-observant Christians (aka Hebrew Roots, Torahism) claim we are still under the Law of Moses and that Law has not changed. Today we’re going to look at one of God’s unchanging principles that has been expressed differently over time: the priesthood. Understanding how the priesthood began and evolved reveals that the Law of Moses is no longer in effect.
Watch the first video on the Principle & Expression framework:
• Understanding the Law ...
DONATE TO OUR MINISTRY
TheBiblicalRoots.org/#donate (Thank you!)
OUR LINKS
linktr.ee/rlsolberg
CHAPTERS
00:00 Open
01:09 Sin requires a mediator
02:28 Tracing the principle over time: Melchizedek, the Levitical priesthood, and the Christian
05:28 Three takeaways from Hebrews 7
10:17 A new priesthood
12:52 Wrap it up Solberg
Subtítulos disponibles en español
Los cristianos observantes de la Torá (también conocidos como raíces hebreas, toraísmo) afirman que todavía estamos bajo la Ley de Moisés y que la Ley no ha cambiado. Hoy vamos a ver uno de los principios inmutables de Dios que se ha expresado de manera diferente a lo largo del tiempo: el sacerdocio. Comprender cómo comenzó y evolucionó el sacerdocio revela que la Ley de Moisés ya no está en vigor.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHANNEL:
czcams.com/users/RLSolberg?s...
FACEBOOK:
/ authorrlsolberg
WEBSITE:
www.RLSolberg.com
I can not thank you enough for these videos!!! I was going down the Hebrew roots movement without even knowing it and was confused for a year too long. Your videos have helped me find answers to that confusing doctrine that I could not make 100% sense of. The play on words and the definitions they use along with the mental gymnastics that I was brought through to try and convince me that “their way was right” left me so depressed but eager to find truth. I have had a true walk with the Lord since I was almost 4 years old and this was very new thinking to me. All along I was thinking that I’m not going to pretend I know scriptures in and out and so let me hear this out (Hebrew roots movement leaders).
Thank you for spelling all of this out. My husband has studied this thoroughly. And he has said everything you have said but the way you wrote it out and explain it makes me grasp it fully!
Thank you thank you!
Wow, thank you so much, Courtney! God is so good.
Blessings,
Rob
Let your husband read this,...
I previously asked which they failed to respond and I am asking everyone on this youtube to remove the Brit Chadashah, and let's assume that the birth of Yeshua did not yet come to past. Now go to Jeremiah 31: and read verse 31 through 34 then respond to the following questions...
1) What is the subject being discussed? Yes, the law of God.
2) How is this covenant going to be different than the other and how it makes it new? According to the passage, the Law of God was written on Tablets of Stones and given to their fathers, the new covenant is about storing and writing them inwardly, a covenant made with the two houses (Israel and Judah) which is what makes it new, without removing the actual law of God.
With the above being said, now go to the Brit Chadashah, Hebrews 8:8-12 and you will see this fulfillment. Read verse 10 carefully, then you would understand what law God through the lips of Jeremiah was God referring to, and in verse 13 you will understand that decayed and waxed old does not imply that the law of God are done away with.
Let me make this clear, the law does not make one God's righteousness, we are made God's righteousness in Yeshua apart from the law, but the law allows one to walk a righteous walk before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, as Zacharias and his wife Elizabeth did.
The council of Nicaea is to be blamed for distorting true Scriptural teachings and God will bring judgement upon them for that and for engraving a lie in many that the law of God was done away with.
I have nothing against Rob, I believe he is a brethren in Yeshua, but he continues to speaks against the law of God, that they are done away with, literally going against Psalms 119:1 where it says, blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD. If you do not walk in the law of God you are then lawless, and according to Romans 8:5-8 you will see that the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be, they are in the flesh. Now, if you read verse 3, 4, you will see that by God sending Yeshua he condemn sin in the flesh so that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
I do not want you to agree with me, nor with Rob, what I like you to do is go to the Scriptures with both views and lean to the true teaching of the Brit Chadashah, what God made clear when he first spoke.
As previously stated, the law cannot save a person and never was it intended to do so, neither can it make a person God's righteousness, but to say that the law of God is done away with that is not Scriptural.
@@sundownsam3369 the Council of Nicea was about refuting the Arianism heresy
I want to say something I'm 74 years old have been a Christian since 1980 have read the Bible many many times and always had trouble understanding false teaching the way you teach the Bible is so clear so easy to understand I can't help but thank God for using you the way he is I would have to say that you are the best teacher I've ever listened to including Church going show called teachers thank you
Thank you so much for sharing that, Larry! God is so good to us.
Blessings, Rob
Yeshua came after the order of Melchisedec because... 1) he was from the tribe of Judah (not Levi), 2) coming after the order of the Aaron he would have had to make an offering for himself before offering himself and we know he was without sin.
Let's go to verse 12, for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law, which is a true statement. In the Aaron priesthood the law was on Tablets of Stones, coming after the order of Melchisedec priesthood the law were stored inwardly. Now you should understand Jeremiah 31:31-34 and Hebrews 8:10 if you weigh it truthfully,
Of course salvation could not come of the Law, the Law was not given to bring salvation to the people and the Scriptures does not make such a statement.
Regarding Hebrews 10:1, again the law was never giving to make one perfect, and if it was able to make one perfect then why did God give them a commandment of a yearly sacrifice with ordinance? As previously stated, the Law was never intended to make one God's righteousness. I would agree that the Aaron priesthood was foreshadow of a new priesthood, but that does not imply that the Law of God is done away with, the change is in the fact that now they are stored and written inwardly.
How can you say that the law of Moses change when they are God's Laws? Are they God's law if yes, why do you continue to call them the Law of Moses?
I do agree that sin requires a mediator, but that has nothing to do with removing the law of God.
You titled this video "How the new priesthood shows the Law of Moses is no longer in effect" , so according to you the Decalogue is no longer in effect, right?
Rob, the Scripture says that the Law of God are "PERFECT", I like to hear you view on this verse.
Hi Rob, by any chance do you have any videos or is it referenced in your book on Torahism addressing the Passage where Jesus says until Heaven and Earth pass away not one letter of the law will be made void? I’m currently wrestling with this issue and that’s probably the scripture at the top of my mind right now
Hi, John. I am still working my way through that complex passage, as well! I will be making a video about it at some point. In the meantime, here's an article I wrote that tries to unpack it a bit: rlsolberg.com/until-all-is-accomplished/
Blessings,
Rob
Excellent presentation... excellent content... powerful...to the point... Lord please continue to bless this ministry 🙏💖....👍👍
God bless u Dr. Solberg. I have a bro whos entrenched into Torahism and i thank God for ur insights. Small changes has been seen but everything in prayer. Pls continue ur work for the glory of God thru Jesus Christ. Either u follow the Torah or Jesus Christ...no middle ground. Shalom
Excellent as always 👍 !!!!!!!!!
1 John 3v4 Sin is transgression of Law=Torah. Rom 6v1 Do we keep Sinning that Grace may abound, Yah Forbid. Rom 3v31 Do we make void the law=Torah through Faith, Yah Forbid, Yea, we Establish the Law=Torah, What has changed in Law=Torah now Yahushua - Jesus is our New Mediator. Matt 5vs17 18 19 20,
Hi Karl. I'm afraid you may have become so Torah-focused that you're starting to see it under every rock and bush. The text of 1 John 3:4 does not mention the Torah. Neither does the context of that passage which runs from 2:28-3:10. The text says that sin is lawlessness (anomia); meaning rebellion, living as a law unto ourselves rather than submitting to God. If sin = transgression of the Law of Moses, then Adam and Eve never sinned.
Shalom,
Rob
Who give the Moses the Law, Adam n Eve Disobey God, Sin is Lawlessness=Torah less Ness. The Sabbath is a Perpetual Covenant, Everlasting. Amos 3v7 Reveals nothing but by His Servants the Prophets. Where in the Prophets does it say the dietary Instructions are done away, swine, mouse is abomination as well homosexuality. Yahushua came to Destroy the works of the Devil and pay the price for Sins, Constantine (Roman Catholic Church) in A. D. 321 they admit to it. Pigs will eat human flesh, dead bodies, Jerimiah 31v31 32 33 34, A Renew Covenant. I've been born again for over 20yrs and read and study many times, many people would disagree what you are saying. 1 John 2v27, the Holy Spirit is are Teacher. The Fear of YAHUWAH is to do good and Evil. Ps 119v142 Thy Righteousness is an EVERLASTING RIGHTEOUSNESS AND THY TORAH IS Truth. Cobs, wollip. This is why I left the Church.
I’ll have to check out more of you videos. Thanks!
Thanks, St. Carr!
I previously asked which they failed to respond and I am asking everyone on this youtube to remove the Brit Chadashah, and let's assume that the birth of Yeshua did not yet come to past. Now go to Jeremiah 31: and read verse 31 through 34 then respond to the following questions...
1) What is the subject being discussed? Yes, the law of God.
2) How is this covenant going to be different than the other and how it makes it new? According to the passage, the Law of God was written on Tablets of Stones and given to their fathers, the new covenant is about storing and writing them inwardly, a covenant made with the two houses (Israel and Judah) which is what makes it new, without removing the actual law of God.
With the above being said, now go to the Brit Chadashah, Hebrews 8:8-12 and you will see this fulfillment. Read verse 10 carefully, then you would understand what law God through the lips of Jeremiah was God referring to, and in verse 13 you will understand that decayed and waxed old does not imply that the law of God are done away with.
Let me make this clear, the law does not make one God's righteousness, we are made God's righteousness in Yeshua apart from the law, but the law allows one to walk a righteous walk before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, as Zacharias and his wife Elizabeth did.
The council of Nicaea is to be blamed for distorting true Scriptural teachings and God will bring judgement upon them for that and for engraving a lie in many that the law of God was done away with.
I have nothing against Rob, I believe he is a brethren in Yeshua, but he continues to speaks against the law of God, that they are done away with, literally going against Psalms 119:1 where it says, blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD. If you do not walk in the law of God you are then lawless, and according to Romans 8:5-8 you will see that the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be, they are in the flesh. Now, if you read verse 3, 4, you will see that by God sending Yeshua he condemn sin in the flesh so that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
I do not want you to agree with me, nor with Rob, what I like you to do is go to the Scriptures with both views and lean to the true teaching of the Brit Chadashah, what God made clear when he first spoke.
As previously stated, the law cannot save a person and never was it intended to do so, neither can it make a person God's righteousness, but to say that the law of God is done away with that is not Scriptural.
@@sundownsam3369 Hello, Sam! At the end of this video I concluded, "The priestly laws of Moses have ended, while the Law of God endures forever." I'm curious which part of that statement you disagree with?
Shalom,
Rob
Hello Rob, I did respond on this and I am sure you have read it on a post on this video.
I've come to believe that in Matthew 5:19 the "heaven and earth" Christ talks about is actually the temple, not the literal heaven and earth. And he is saying there will be no change in the law until the temple is destroyed. I believe the 40 year period between pentecost to the destruction of the temple in AD70 was a transition period between the old and new covenants. This is why we see so many time statements in the new testament speaking of the near and soon end of the age. They were speaking of the end of the old covenant age. And it's why we see this in Hebrews 8:13:
In speaking of a new covenant He has made the first one old. Now that which is decaying and growing old is ready to vanish away.
Hebrews 8:13
From the perspective of the witter of Hebrews AD70 would be the end of the old covenant, it was ready to vanish away. The levitical priesthood and old covenant temple system was about to be replaced with the heavenly Jerusalem and messianic priesthood in Christ. The new covenant age which we are in now.
Defending the Biblical Roots of Christianity
Would you do a breakdown on SDA and Ellen G White?
Thanks for your stuff.
Discovered you through Good Fight Ministries.
God Be with you.
Kamloops BC Canada 🍁 🙏🏼📖
Would your argument have a different meaning for you if you read the word in Hebrews 7:12 as transfer or transport instead of change? The connative meanings are different. Why would your argument change or why not? Reference Strongs and Thayer's Geeek Dictionary. Thank you.
Hi J! To avoid chasing down a theoretical rabbit trail, is there a good reason to suggest an interpretation of μετάθεσις (metathesis) as meaning "transfer" or "transport"? ~Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots Was the law changed or was it transferred to another? You continue to emphasize a change in the law which has a different connotation than transfer.
Hi I’m kind of new in God’s way and I have a question which bible is closer to the Hebrew and Greek transition?
Hi, El Gaiko! Every translation has some strong and weak points. So I would recommend reading different translations as you study the Word. And remember that some translations take a word-for-word approach, and others use a thought-for-thought approach. Here is a helpful comparison chart: lavendervines.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Bible-Translation-Chart.jpg
Blessings,
Rob
Look up the video, "New Testament Manuscript Battles - Intro Byzantine & Alexandrian Texts" on youtube for more info.
What is important that you pickup the Scriptures and study it, establishing a relationship with God in Yeshua, the Spirit of God will give you a truth understanding of what God make clear when he first spoke.
God's Righteousness was imputed to Us through Christ. Yes Christ was the righteous one but through Christ we receive God's Righteousness A little point that I think gets twisted when talked about
"the priestly laws of Moses have ended but the law of God endures forever"
that ending, wow!! Shalom
Thank you for watching, Allyson!
Blessings,
Rob
Hi. What is the New Law under the new priesthood?
Law of Christ
Torah. There is no new law. The Law of Christ is God’s Law and that’s according to Christ Himself 🤷🏾♂️
James Giles Misconceptions on band camp
My old band
I did the vocals guitar lyrics and wrote the tunes.
We did the demo in a basement studio in 8 days.
Kinda raw and very heathen.
God took me from the ditch Praise His Mighty Name.
At one time had a slick album done at the Warehouse in Van BC…song on radio video on Much Music.
I am so grateful to Jesus for His Grace.
God Bless…
I get the impression your playing the guitar on your clips.
Blessings
Band camp
You are correct, sir! That's my guitar playing in the music cues. Thank you for sharing a bit of your testimony.
Shalom,
Rob
Defending the Biblical Roots of Christianity
Awesome man-good playing!
What city are you in?
@@TruthSetFree-zm1ep I'm in Nashville, TN.
Defending the Biblical Roots of Christianity
I found that out-and thank you for your timely responses.
I am really enjoying your excellent work.
God Be with you-looking forward to more to come.
Thank you!!
Hallelujah, our mediator has risen!
Matt 28:5,6
5 ¶ And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified.
6 He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay.
Amen, Shelly!
Could you explain matthew 5:19 and also why in isa 66 it seems we will be keeping the law in the future, also the torah says that this command is eternal
He is not understanding it is in fact VERY MUCH for today and we must keep it!!!
Hi Priscilla. In this video, I showed how the laws regarding the priesthood have changed under the New Covenant. So I'm curious what your position is on Christ-followers keeping the priestly laws in the Torah today. Do you believe we should be doing so?
~Rob
Matthew 5:19 Is referring to the roles Christian’s will have in the millenial kingdom. (Christ reigning from Jerusalem)… very soon I believe.
This ties into the judgment seat of Christ and rewards we receive for our Christian walk. Not salvation as Christ alone guarantees that but we are judged for what we did after we are saved and how close to God we walked.
@@TheBiblicalRoots Hi i agree with most things you teach but I was wondering about matthew 5:19, Jesus seems to say you must keep the law of moses to be called great in heaven
He cannot answer this, he will use sophisms to manipulate the text, but he does a horrible job at it. A professor?
Can you discuss this with Hebrew Israelites?
R. L. Great content, once again. Ditto to the request from woman at the well re. Calvinism. Pastor Greg
Malachi 3:6 *For I am YHWH I change not*
Psalms 19:7 *The Law of YHWH is Perfect; converting the soul*
YHWH word is very plain and simple.
1. *Read* the word
2. *Study* the word
4. *Meditate* on the word
4. *Act* on the word
Malachi 4:4
“Remember to obey the Law of Moses, my servant-all the decrees and regulations that I gave him on Mount Sinai for all Israel."
---
Romans 9:6-8
It is not as though God’s word had failed. For *not all who are descended from Israel are Israel.* Nor because they are his descendants are they all Abraham’s children. On the contrary, “It is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned.” In other words, *it is not the children by physical descent who are God’s children, but it is the children of the promise who are regarded as Abraham’s offspring."*
---
Several statements in Romans 11 please read whole chapter:
"I ask then: Did God reject his people? By no means! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. God did not reject his people, whom he foreknew. Don’t you know what Scripture says in the passage about Elijah-how he appealed to God against Israel: “Lord, they have killed your prophets and torn down your altars; I am the only one left, and they are trying to kill me”? And what was God’s answer to him? “I have reserved for myself seven thousand who have not bowed the knee to Baal.” So too, at the present time there is a remnant chosen by grace. And if by grace, then it cannot be based on works; if it were, grace would no longer be grace."
"If the part of the dough offered as firstfruits is holy, then the whole batch is holy; if the root is holy, so are the branches."
"If some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, do not consider yourself to be superior to those other branches. If you do, consider this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you. You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in.” Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but tremble. For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either."
"Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off. And if they do not persist in unbelief, they will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again. After all, if you were cut out of an olive tree that is wild by nature, and contrary to nature were grafted into a cultivated olive tree, how much more readily will these, the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree!"
*"I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery,* brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, *and in this way all Israel will be saved.* As it is written:"
“The deliverer will come from Zion;
he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.
And this is my covenant with them
when I take away their sins.”
------
James 1:1
"James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ,
*To the twelve tribes scattered among the nations:*
Greetings."
James 1:16-18
"Don’t be deceived, my dear brothers and sisters.Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows. He chose to give us birth through the word of truth, that we might be a kind of firstfruits of all He created."
James 1:22-25
" *Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says.* Anyone who listens to the word but does not do what it says is like someone who looks at his face in a mirror and, after looking at himself, goes away and immediately forgets what he looks like. But whoever looks intently into the perfect law that gives freedom, and continues in it-not forgetting what they have heard, but doing it-they will be blessed in what they do."
-----
Several sections from James 2 please read full chapter:
"If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, “Love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing right. But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers. For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it. For he who said, “You shall not commit adultery,” also said, “You shall not murder.” If you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you have become a lawbreaker."
"Speak and act as those who are going to be judged by the law that gives freedom, because judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful. Mercy triumphs over judgment."
"What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead."
"But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.'"
"Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds. *You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that-and shudder."*
*"You foolish person, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless?* Was not our father Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did. And the scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” and he was called God’s friend. *You see that a person is considered righteous by what they do and not by faith alone."*
-----
My own commentary:
We are the lost sheep of the house of Israel. That is who Jesus said that He came for, and that is the fulfillment of prophecy. We are saved by faith alone! But we are to walk how Jesus walked, attaining righteousness through His work and not our own. We are simply His handiwork. Don't take pride in your own works, boast in what Christ has done in you.
These things are not in conflict as so many teach. It is true that we are saved by faith, but faith without works is dead!!!
Learn the parable of the wicked vine growers, the father sent the son with the same message as the servants (prophets) before him!
Love God and keep His commandments.
Malachi is the last prophet before John. Everyone needs to read Malachi.
God bless you!!
@@charitybrook6279 who are the deceandants of Jacob and are they still living today?
need to dig a whole lot deeper , deeper than religion has deceived us
Isa 66:12 - For thus saith the LORD, Behold, I will extend peace to her like a river, and the glory of the Gentiles like a flowing stream: then shall ye suck, ye shall be borne upon her sides, and be dandled upon her knees.--- Isa 66:21 - And I will also take of them for priests and for Levites, saith the LORD.()-so this is in the future right? So we would have both types of priests....like David would of been
melchizedek
Keep up the great work!
if you woke up in a garden with no memory of how you got there, would it raise suspicions your mind? How did I get here? what am I doing here? then a voice claiming to be God orders you not to touch a certain tree? what would an intelligent person think? Adam suspected and eveentually determined for himself that this voice IS NOT God, that a deception was being played on him and Eve. Adam decided that the voice WAS NOT God and thus defied the given “law” by biting the fruit and spitting it out, to show defiance against his condition and a refusal to be enslaved by the “master” trying to control him. He was not tempted by the romise of forbidden knowledge, he was committing a righteous act of rebellion against a false god. It was an imprisonment in the garden, so Adam decided he would deny the “captors” by defying the orders. He spit out the apple because he did not care for whatever forbidden knowledge was being offered but only sought to rebel against who was actually Satan- the one who tried to make the law, trying to be God. This is the real story of the garden. Adam was basically the first mind control target, and he rebelled against it, and righteously so.
God bless guide heal comfort you in Jesus Holy name Amen ♥ 🙏
In 1:45 you say God is Holy he cannot be in the presence of Sin? Really? Where in the Bible does it say that?
Shalom, Yisrael! That statement does not mean that God is unable to be around sin as if it is some sort of Kryptonite or something that could possibly taint Him. It is about His holiness and perfection. Perhaps a better way to state it would have been that sin cannot be in the presence of God. Because when God draws near to sin, the raging inferno of His love and holiness washes all sin away. This is why God takes all sin upon Himself in Jesus and in the Old Testament. Sin crushes, enslaves, and destroys humanity, but it vanishes away into nothingness at the smallest touch of God’s blazing holiness.
Blessings,
Rob
Thank you for your educational presentation. I’d be curious to hear your viewpoints on Calvinism, cessationism and the role of women in modern times.
Cessationism is obvious in this world. The role of women is defined pretty clearly in the Bible. Also I personally don't see the doctrines of TULIP in the Bible unless something is taken out of context. That's just my take.
Both calvinism and cessationism are false. Women cannot teach over men, but can teach children and other women
@@heathers4961 when you say cessationism, if you believe that people today are speaking in tongues or healing by laying hands then you're Biblically illiterate. Speaking in tongues was never a gibberish language and it wasn't in church history at all until Pentacostalism came around.
@@SixStringSlinger1 I don't argue with straw men. Have a good day.
@@SixStringSlinger1 Is your school of thought that if you don’t see it then it isn’t valid for today? I mean would a miracle happen for someone who doesn’t believe in miracles? We still do not see Him face to face and see in a mirror dimly and in 1 Cor. 12 instructions are given for use of the gifts. As far as the role of women is concerned, their is much discrepancy among the ESV version and KJV with regard to passages concerning womens roles and Paul dealing with particular problems in certain churches. Timothy was written to correct wayward overseers dealing with problems regarding false teachings coming from certain women coming into the assembly. In Corinthians Paul is dealing with a church influenced by Roman Imperial cult activity. Under Roman law women had no rights, and the Greeks resented women who spoke in public. No where in the Torah are women forbidden to speak so where it refers to it is improper for them to speak. They should be submissive, just as the law says. The context is under the Roman law. I am always learning so I thought I would share this with you in hopes you can see another perspective on those difficult passages. Cultural context is certainly relevant to correct interpretation, because as a society we have evolved into women having rights and vote and work, etc. I will add a link for an article explaining better than I the context of those passages in light of passages where women are in leading positions.
Amen brother great teaching.
This teaching dismantles the catholic and orthodox belief of the need of the priesthood and the believers reliance on them.
Unfortunately they will strongly disagree…
I don’t see how, Rob, which I think he’s doing good work here, is offering an interpretation concerning the veil. What’s interesting is that churches since the first century always ordered their churches with priest. As a matter of fact, the word presbyter is etymologically the original form of “priest.” So they have a basis for a priesthood, because just as the levitical priesthood were the guardians of the Old Testament faith, so the priesthood of the New Testament are the guardians of the faith. We’ve benefit from that priesthood because of the doctrines we hold today, such as the trinity, the divinity and humanity of Jesus, the canon of the New Testament etc.
@@simplydanny
???? Rome was burning all the Christian’s, feeding them to lions etc christians we’re meeting in houses secretly for over 150 years AD.
the ignorance is astounding. sooooo sick of you Catholics and orthodox defending the indefensible.
@@lionsoftruthministries3126 but we have Church Fathers and Early Christians who wrote things down. You also have Ignatious of Antioch who in his seven letters before martyrdom wrote about how churches are to be ordered. He states you don’t have a church unless you have a Bishop, Priest and Deacons.
@@simplydanny
error was already creeping into the church in Galatia. read Galatians.
If that was happening 40-50AD it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see what will happen in the future. traditions of men continue to infiltrate the church (body of Christ those born again…not a building!) to this very day. Look at all the doctrine of the Catholic Church. just read some of the catechism it will blow ur mind. Paul wouldn’t recognise any of this.
just because an early Christian starts bringing in error and tradition doesn’t mean it’s correct because it’s old. Churches in Galatia were already straying in 50ad
@@lionsoftruthministries3126 the thing is that you don’t have a basis for truth except your interpretations of scripture. Everyone claims to have the right interpretation but contradict each other. Catholics and Orthodox use the same method that they used against the Donatist, Judaizers and the rest, Apostolic Succession. How did someone know they followed the Church of Christ? They can trace their teaching from teacher to student back to the apostles. Funny that’s the same methodology the Jews used to determine the correct interpretations. I agree error was creeping in, but do you know you’re not in error? How do you know you interpretation of scripture is correct? Holy Spirit? Everyone claims that and contradict each other. The way that you knew that you were getting the right teaching in the early years was that you can trace your teaching back from bishop to bishop all the way back to the apostles.
Hello Brother. I was turned on to you by Good Fight Ministries. After viewing your interview with Chad Davidson, I was very interested in hearing more from you. Reading some of the comments you have received, it's very true what Jesus said in John 15:20. It's so obvious. Anyway stay strong and continue to bring forth God's word with boldness and power. God bless you and your ministry.
Thank you, Mrs. Morgann! Blessings, Rob
Hello Shalom from Arkansas, I want to say thank you ! I’ve been practicing Torahism for a couple of years now along side my daughters and there husbands. I have been feeling in my spirit that something just wasn’t right then Your videos just stated popping up in my feed. I have many questions but this one is really bugging me, what was the point of Jesus death and resurrection? My kids say it wasn’t a sacrifice because There were any human sacrifices. I have many questions. Your videos have inspired me to dig into the Bible. Thank you
Amen!
Amen!
I previously asked which they failed to respond and I am asking everyone on this youtube to remove the Brit Chadashah, and let's assume that the birth of Yeshua did not yet come to past. Now go to Jeremiah 31: and read verse 31 through 34 then respond to the following questions...
1) What is the subject being discussed? Yes, the law of God.
2) How is this covenant going to be different than the other and how it makes it new? According to the passage, the Law of God was written on Tablets of Stones and given to their fathers, the new covenant is about storing and writing them inwardly, a covenant made with the two houses (Israel and Judah) which is what makes it new, without removing the actual law of God.
With the above being said, now go to the Brit Chadashah, Hebrews 8:8-12 and you will see this fulfillment. Read verse 10 carefully, then you would understand what law God through the lips of Jeremiah was God referring to, and in verse 13 you will understand that decayed and waxed old does not imply that the law of God are done away with.
Let me make this clear, the law does not make one God's righteousness, we are made God's righteousness in Yeshua apart from the law, but the law allows one to walk a righteous walk before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, as Zacharias and his wife Elizabeth did.
The council of Nicaea is to be blamed for distorting true Scriptural teachings and God will bring judgement upon them for that and for engraving a lie in many that the law of God was done away with.
I have nothing against Rob, I believe he is a brethren in Yeshua, but he continues to speaks against the law of God, that they are done away with, literally going against Psalms 119:1 where it says, blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD. If you do not walk in the law of God you are then lawless, and according to Romans 8:5-8 you will see that the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be, they are in the flesh. Now, if you read verse 3, 4, you will see that by God sending Yeshua he condemn sin in the flesh so that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
I do not want you to agree with me, nor with Rob, what I like you to do is go to the Scriptures with both views and lean to the true teaching of the Brit Chadashah, what God made clear when he first spoke.
As previously stated, the law cannot save a person and never was it intended to do so, neither can it make a person God's righteousness, but to say that the law of God is done away with that is not Scriptural.
Great Video! From reading the comments I can defiantly see how this can be very confusing for those who believe in a works based gospel. Ephesians 2-8
Thanks Rob, so perfectly unpacked and explained.
I previously asked which they failed to respond and I am asking everyone on this youtube to remove the Brit Chadashah, and let's assume that the birth of Yeshua did not yet come to past. Now go to Jeremiah 31: and read verse 31 through 34 then respond to the following questions...
1) What is the subject being discussed? Yes, the law of God.
2) How is this covenant going to be different than the other and how it makes it new? According to the passage, the Law of God was written on Tablets of Stones and given to their fathers, the new covenant is about storing and writing them inwardly, a covenant made with the two houses (Israel and Judah) which is what makes it new, without removing the actual law of God.
With the above being said, now go to the Brit Chadashah, Hebrews 8:8-12 and you will see this fulfillment. Read verse 10 carefully, then you would understand what law God through the lips of Jeremiah was God referring to, and in verse 13 you will understand that decayed and waxed old does not imply that the law of God are done away with.
Let me make this clear, the law does not make one God's righteousness, we are made God's righteousness in Yeshua apart from the law, but the law allows one to walk a righteous walk before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, as Zacharias and his wife Elizabeth did.
The council of Nicaea is to be blamed for distorting true Scriptural teachings and God will bring judgement upon them for that and for engraving a lie in many that the law of God was done away with.
I have nothing against Rob, I believe he is a brethren in Yeshua, but he continues to speaks against the law of God, that they are done away with, literally going against Psalms 119:1 where it says, blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD. If you do not walk in the law of God you are then lawless, and according to Romans 8:5-8 you will see that the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be, they are in the flesh. Now, if you read verse 3, 4, you will see that by God sending Yeshua he condemn sin in the flesh so that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
I do not want you to agree with me, nor with Rob, what I like you to do is go to the Scriptures with both views and lean to the true teaching of the Brit Chadashah, what God made clear when he first spoke.
As previously stated, the law cannot save a person and never was it intended to do so, neither can it make a person God's righteousness, but to say that the law of God is done away with that is not Scriptural.
@@sundownsam3369 thanks for the response. I zm a simple thinker but desiring truth. My main question is not necessarily Law related but if something that is expected as a Christian. So as Christians should or needn't be baptised like Yeshua and partake of the sacrament like He asked of the Deciples.
Even though Yeshua's baptism can be taken as an example, the fact is that those who believed were baptized, but baptism has nothing to do with salvation. I will say that those who believe would want to get baptized, making a statement that for me to live is Christ, and through this one is expressing the willingness of denying oneself and taking up the cross to follow him.
I hope I understood your question of sacrament, unless you meant something else.
Clear and concise…thank you, Jesus!
Amen 🙏
Shalom M. Solberg, you said many pleasant things before The Lord Father and Our Lord Mashiah ! Be Blessed !
Sure... "For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law."
- Change prophesied in :
Genesis 49: 10 : "The Sceptre "shall not depart from Judah", nor a Lawgiver from between his feet, "UNTIL SHILO COME" ; and "UNTO HIM" "shall The Gathering of the People" be"."
I'd be very pleased to share with you, maybe in private. I will try to send you a message by facebook...
Amyn !
Hebrews 9: 8-10 : "The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into The Holiest of all was not yet made manifest, "while as the first tabernacle was yet standing" : "Which was a Figure for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, "that could not make him that did the service "Perfect", as pertaining to the conscience"; "Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, "IMPOSED ON THEM" "UNTIL THE TIME OF REFORMATION"."
You can't pick and choose verses... for this view doesn't go along with these verses...
Hebrews 8:4 " For if indeed He were on earth, He would not be priest, since there are priests who offer the gifts according to the Torah."
He, Messiah, didn't "replace" the Levitical priests.
Jeremiah 33:18 "and for the priests, the Levites, there is not to cease a man to offer ascending offerings before me....."
33:20 " Thus says Yahweh, " If you could break My covenant with the day and My covenant with the night, so that there be not day and night in their season, then my covenant could also be broken with David My servant- so that he shall not have a son to reign upon his throne-and with the Levites, the priests, My attendants."
Hi, Sarah. Thanks for watching!
I guess I don't see the conflict with the verses you listed. For example, in Hebrews 8:4 the author is showing that the priesthood of Jesus was not established on earth. The main point he is making is the impossibility of Jesus fulfilling the conditions of a Mosaic high priest because He was not from the tribe of Levi, as the law of Moses required. And he's also making the larger point that Jesus executes His priestly duties in the heavenly places, rather than here on earth like human priests.
Shalom,
Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots You're right. He now serves the Heavenly temple. What the earthly one was copied from.
This letter was written to Hebrews who knew the Scriptures. Around the time the earthly temple was to be destroyed. The writer is trying to reveal Messiah as High Priest and how that will work going forward. But Hebrews 8:4 shows that If HE were on earth He would not be a priest. So this means He did not replace the Levitical. The Jeremiah 33 verses I shared shows the covenant with the Levites will not be broken as long as there is day and night. But the Levitical priests were not going to have a Temple to use in the near future, when this letter was written.
The main focus of chapter 9 of Hebrews is revealed in verse 9:1. "Had regulations of worship and the earthly set apart place". Which was about to "disappear". Next the focus begins about The day of Atonement. How the High Priest would go in the Most Set Apart place with the blood, once a year. And how now this applies to Messiah and the heavenly temple.
So do you believe that the Levitical priesthood has been done away with forever? And you believe that all the laws of YHWH have changed? Or only the ones focused on in this letter?
@@sarahcriner3097 Hi, Sarah. I believe the Levitical priesthood has ended, yes. Is it gone forever? That's a good question! I don't get very dogmatic about eschatology, so I am not prepared to state categorically that the Levitical priesthood will never be restored. But I feel comfortable saying that, if that priesthood is ever restored, it will serve an entirely different function. Because the function it served under the Sinai Covenant was fulfilled in Christ.
And as I stated in the video, the Law of God is eternal and unchanging. The thing that has changed is the way Yahweh expresses His unchanging principles. And even the various expressions of the Law of God are far more similar to each other than different. So while the priestly laws of Moses have ended, the Law of God endures forever.
Blessings,
Rob
The problem with the TO community is they don't read the scriptures.
1. Jeremiah says the NEW covenant WILL NOT BE like the old covenant AND it will be written on people's hearts. They must ignore Jeremiah when he says it will not be like the old and go to the end and say oh the only thing that has changed is it will be written on people's hearts. The issue with this is Paul's allegory of the two covenants doesn't fit with their presupposition. Paul's allegory is two different and distinct people allegorized as the two covenants. In order for their interpretation to be correct Hagar MUST = old and new covenants with a change of heart or Hagar literally becomes Sarah. The only other way for this interpretation to be correct is for Paul to use Abram>Abraham, Sarai>Sarah, Jacob>Israel, or even using himself Saul>Paul because they are all the same person they have just had a change of "heart"
2. If the new covenant is just a "RENEWED" old covenant then in order for their argument to be consistent then non-Israelites must enter into the New covenant the same way they entered the old, which would require physical circumcision. The apostles said NO they don't have to.
3)Christ said make disciples of all nations. Deu 23 1-3 forbids all people and nations from joining the covenant. Verse 3 of Deu 23 forbids the men of Moab and Ammon from entering the covenant FOREVER. Incidentally verse 6 says that Israel was to not wish peace or prosperity on Ammon and Moab forever this would actually be considered a curse correct. CHrist said to not curse your enemies.
I have heard the idea of a "renewed" covenant before, too. But that's not what Jesus called it. "This cup that is poured out for you is the new (kainos) covenant in my blood" (Luke 22:20, see also 1 Cor 11:25). The Greek workd _kainos_ means "new," not "renewed." It's the same word Paul uses when he refers to Christians as "ministers of a new covenant" (2 Cor 3:6). And the author of Hebrews uses that same word for "new covenant" in Heb 8:8, 8:13, and 9:15. And in Hebrews 12:24 the word is _neos_ which means "young, new" covenant.
~Rob
I previously asked which they failed to respond and I am asking everyone on this youtube to remove the Brit Chadashah, and let's assume that the birth of Yeshua did not yet come to past. Now go to Jeremiah 31: and read verse 31 through 34 then respond to the following questions...
1) What is the subject being discussed? Yes, the law of God.
2) How is this covenant going to be different than the other and how it makes it new? According to the passage, the Law of God was written on Tablets of Stones and given to their fathers, the new covenant is about storing and writing them inwardly, a covenant made with the two houses (Israel and Judah) which is what makes it new, without removing the actual law of God.
With the above being said, now go to the Brit Chadashah, Hebrews 8:8-12 and you will see this fulfillment. Read verse 10 carefully, then you would understand what law God through the lips of Jeremiah was God referring to, and in verse 13 you will understand that decayed and waxed old does not imply that the law of God are done away with.
Let me make this clear, the law does not make one God's righteousness, we are made God's righteousness in Yeshua apart from the law, but the law allows one to walk a righteous walk before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, as Zacharias and his wife Elizabeth did.
The council of Nicaea is to be blamed for distorting true Scriptural teachings and God will bring judgement upon them for that and for engraving a lie in many that the law of God was done away with.
I have nothing against Rob, I believe he is a brethren in Yeshua, but he continues to speaks against the law of God, that they are done away with, literally going against Psalms 119:1 where it says, blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD. If you do not walk in the law of God you are then lawless, and according to Romans 8:5-8 you will see that the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be, they are in the flesh. Now, if you read verse 3, 4, you will see that by God sending Yeshua he condemn sin in the flesh so that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
I do not want you to agree with me, nor with Rob, what I like you to do is go to the Scriptures with both views and lean to the true teaching of the Brit Chadashah, what God made clear when he first spoke.
As previously stated, the law cannot save a person and never was it intended to do so, neither can it make a person God's righteousness, but to say that the law of God is done away with that is not Scriptural.
The Hebrew Roots Movement is legalism taken to the extremes. In Jesus there is liberty.
Romans 8:1-3
Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death. For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh,
2 Corinthians 3:1
Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
Thank you Brother, Another wonderful clear & concise message.... The Word of God has 18 scriptures that deal with Stiff-Necked & rebellious people...I prefer to be like a child in which your kind and thoughtful accurate words are a Blessing Acts 7:51 "You stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always resist the Holy Spirit! As your fathers did, so you do..... Matthew 18:1-5
And he said: “Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore, whoever takes the lowly position of this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven..... lots of people on the other side of the "Eternal Kingdom wall"
I previously asked which they failed to respond and I am asking everyone on this youtube to remove the Brit Chadashah, and let's assume that the birth of Yeshua did not yet come to past. Now go to Jeremiah 31: and read verse 31 through 34 then respond to the following questions...
1) What is the subject being discussed? Yes, the law of God.
2) How is this covenant going to be different than the other and how it makes it new? According to the passage, the Law of God was written on Tablets of Stones and given to their fathers, the new covenant is about storing and writing them inwardly, a covenant made with the two houses (Israel and Judah) which is what makes it new, without removing the actual law of God.
With the above being said, now go to the Brit Chadashah, Hebrews 8:8-12 and you will see this fulfillment. Read verse 10 carefully, then you would understand what law God through the lips of Jeremiah was God referring to, and in verse 13 you will understand that decayed and waxed old does not imply that the law of God are done away with.
Let me make this clear, the law does not make one God's righteousness, we are made God's righteousness in Yeshua apart from the law, but the law allows one to walk a righteous walk before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, as Zacharias and his wife Elizabeth did.
The council of Nicaea is to be blamed for distorting true Scriptural teachings and God will bring judgement upon them for that and for engraving a lie in many that the law of God was done away with.
I have nothing against Rob, I believe he is a brethren in Yeshua, but he continues to speaks against the law of God, that they are done away with, literally going against Psalms 119:1 where it says, blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD. If you do not walk in the law of God you are then lawless, and according to Romans 8:5-8 you will see that the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be, they are in the flesh. Now, if you read verse 3, 4, you will see that by God sending Yeshua he condemn sin in the flesh so that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
I do not want you to agree with me, nor with Rob, what I like you to do is go to the Scriptures with both views and lean to the true teaching of the Brit Chadashah, what God made clear when he first spoke.
As previously stated, the law cannot save a person and never was it intended to do so, neither can it make a person God's righteousness, but to say that the law of God is done away with that is not Scriptural.
Awesome , this is great , thank you praise God
I previously asked which they failed to respond and I am asking everyone on this youtube to remove the Brit Chadashah, and let's assume that the birth of Yeshua did not yet come to past. Now go to Jeremiah 31: and read verse 31 through 34 then respond to the following questions...
1) What is the subject being discussed? Yes, the law of God.
2) How is this covenant going to be different than the other and how it makes it new? According to the passage, the Law of God was written on Tablets of Stones and given to their fathers, the new covenant is about storing and writing them inwardly, a covenant made with the two houses (Israel and Judah) which is what makes it new, without removing the actual law of God.
With the above being said, now go to the Brit Chadashah, Hebrews 8:8-12 and you will see this fulfillment. Read verse 10 carefully, then you would understand what law God through the lips of Jeremiah was God referring to, and in verse 13 you will understand that decayed and waxed old does not imply that the law of God are done away with.
Let me make this clear, the law does not make one God's righteousness, we are made God's righteousness in Yeshua apart from the law, but the law allows one to walk a righteous walk before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, as Zacharias and his wife Elizabeth did.
The council of Nicaea is to be blamed for distorting true Scriptural teachings and God will bring judgement upon them for that and for engraving a lie in many that the law of God was done away with.
I have nothing against Rob, I believe he is a brethren in Yeshua, but he continues to speaks against the law of God, that they are done away with, literally going against Psalms 119:1 where it says, blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD. If you do not walk in the law of God you are then lawless, and according to Romans 8:5-8 you will see that the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be, they are in the flesh. Now, if you read verse 3, 4, you will see that by God sending Yeshua he condemn sin in the flesh so that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
I do not want you to agree with me, nor with Rob, what I like you to do is go to the Scriptures with both views and lean to the true teaching of the Brit Chadashah, what God made clear when he first spoke.
As previously stated, the law cannot save a person and never was it intended to do so, neither can it make a person God's righteousness, but to say that the law of God is done away with that is not Scriptural.
Thanks for watching, Johnny!
Hey, Sam! You should watch this video to the end. My final statement was, "the priestly laws of Moses have ended while the Law of God endures forever." Which part of this do you disagree with?
Shalom,
Rob
Rob, I did watch the entire video, and I have not yet responded to you, I was responded to that person with the filthy mouth who appears to not have a relationship with God in Yeshua, and responded to those who say that the law of God is done are with.
Again, I heard your entire video, an articulate presentation, but you appear to be given an opinion as well. With your videos, I go over it several times, not to find error, but to see if you are speaking according to what God made clear when he first spoke. I truthfully and fairly weigh your teachings, not to mention that your videos causes me to indulge in the Scriptures to see what God says on a topic. I do not read commentaries to respond as many do, if I use a commentary is just to see what is writing on something I have a difficult time understanding, rarely does that happen because the topic that is being discuss I study well, but still it is my practice to go into the Scriptures when responding.
I learned in life that many give an amen, but in reality many of those who give an amen probably don't even read Scriptures. I wonder how many of those who gave you an amen or a thumbs up literally go into the Scriptures to see if what you are saying is according to God's word.
As I stated, I will get back to you on the council of nicaea, who were the cause of distorting true Scriptural teachings and building a wall to separate the Gentiles from the Jews.
Sundown Sam
God Bless you.
Hope you are well.
What are your thoughts on
Jeremiah 3?
Specifically Jeremiah 3:8
Jeremiah 3:16 ?
How do you reconcile these passages ? I pray that you have an opportunity to study more through these passages:
1 Timothy 1:9
Romans 4:14-15
Romans 2:29
* 2 Corinthians 3:16-18
Galatians 2:11-21
Galatians 3
Galatians 4:21-31
Galatians 5
Colossians 2:16
Hebrews 8:13
Acts 15:10
You either follow God or you follow Paul
Thanks, Keenan. That is a false dichotomy. Shalom, Rob
your title is a very clear violation of scripture. the actual words of Messiah: For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.
Matthew 5:18
Thanks, Mike! I agree with you that the title was worded in a way that could lead people to the wrong conclusion, so I changed it from "has ended" to "is no longer in effect." The Mosaic Law still plays a role in the life of the Christ-follower, just not as a legal requirement.
Shalom,
Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots again with the wording. the law is not a legal requirement. a duck is not a duck.
@@TheBiblicalRoots Props for trying to appease and stand on level ground 🕊🙏👊😎
He did not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it.
From my understanding you appear to believe that the law of God is not done away with. Read the following so you have a good understand of God's law, but I will say this to be careful with the hebrew root movement, they appear to make the law as part of salvation, they dress so much on the temple, rarely do that talk about Yeshua, and rarely do they teach how to walk a Christ-like walk.
Hope you learn something from what I posted... I previously asked which they failed to respond and I am asking everyone on this youtube to remove the Brit Chadashah, and let's assume that the birth of Yeshua did not yet come to past. Now go to Jeremiah 31: and read verse 31 through 34 then respond to the following questions...
1) What is the subject being discussed? Yes, the law of God.
2) How is this covenant going to be different than the other and how it makes it new? According to the passage, the Law of God was written on Tablets of Stones and given to their fathers, the new covenant is about storing and writing them inwardly, a covenant made with the two houses (Israel and Judah) which is what makes it new, without removing the actual law of God.
With the above being said, now go to the Brit Chadashah, Hebrews 8:8-12 and you will see this fulfillment. Read verse 10 carefully, then you would understand what law God through the lips of Jeremiah was God referring to, and in verse 13 you will understand that decayed and waxed old does not imply that the law of God are done away with.
Let me make this clear, the law does not make one God's righteousness, we are made God's righteousness in Yeshua apart from the law, but the law allows one to walk a righteous walk before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, as Zacharias and his wife Elizabeth did.
The council of Nicaea is to be blamed for distorting true Scriptural teachings and God will bring judgement upon them for that and for engraving a lie in many that the law of God was done away with.
I have nothing against Rob, I believe he is a brethren in Yeshua, but he continues to speaks against the law of God, that they are done away with, literally going against Psalms 119:1 where it says, blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD. If you do not walk in the law of God you are then lawless, and according to Romans 8:5-8 you will see that the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be, they are in the flesh. Now, if you read verse 3, 4, you will see that by God sending Yeshua he condemn sin in the flesh so that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
I do not want you to agree with me, nor with Rob, what I like you to do is go to the Scriptures with both views and lean to the true teaching of the Brit Chadashah, what God made clear when he first spoke.
As previously stated, the law cannot save a person and never was it intended to do so, neither can it make a person God's righteousness, but to say that the law of God is done away with that is not Scriptural.
A person using the apocryphal and dubious book of Hebrews to nullify the Torah. Surely have a place in eternal hell.
Professor, please read the Torah for the sake of Torah, not for what you want it to say…..it never will.
Psalms 119:32
I run in the path of your commandments , for you have broadened my understanding.
Deuteronomy 10:12-13
“And now, Israel, what does the Lord your God require of you, but to fear the Lord your God, to walk in all his ways, to love him, to serve the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, and to keep the commandments and statutes of the Lord, which I am commanding you today for your good?
Genesis 26:5
Because Abraham obeyed my voice and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.”
Exodus 16;28
And the Lord said to Moses, “How long will you refuse to keep my commandments and my laws?
Leviticus 18:5
Keep my decrees and laws, for the person who obeys them will live by them. I am the LORD.
Ecclesiastes 12:13
Now all has been heard; here is the conclusion of the matter: Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the duty of all mankind.
Thanks, Thorne, and amen! May the Torah tell me what to think, not the other way around. Shalom, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots so take Jesit out of your mind to read it, because he isn’t in the Torah.
@@TheBiblicalRoots
Hosea 3:4
For the Israelites will live many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or sacred stones, without ephod or household gods.
How long is many days?
Proverbs 29:18
Where there is no prophetic vision the people cast off restraint, but blessed is he who keeps the Torah.
Hosea 14:2
Take words with you and return to the LORD. Say to him: “Forgive all our sins and receive us graciously, that we may offer the fruit of our lips.
Psalms 50:9-13
I have no need of a bull from your stall or of goats from your pens,
for every animal of the forest is mine, and the cattle on a thousand hills.
I know every bird in the mountains, and the insects in the fields are mine.
If I were hungry I would not tell you, for the world is mine, and all that is in it.
Do I eat the flesh of bulls or drink the blood of goats?
Sacrifice is not what Christians or Christianity purports. Leviticus 17:11 is read out of context, not read with 17:10, not read with Ezekiel 16:6.
There is always a deeper meaning!
He came to fulfill the law of the prophets, not abbolish it.
Hi Chris! Actually, Jesus did not say that He came to fulfill "the law *of* the prophets," but rather the Law *and* the Prophets, which is a phrase that refers to the entire Hebrew Bible (what Christians call the Old Testament ). And in Luke 24:44-48 the resurrected Jesus essentially says, "Remember when I told you I came to fulfill the law and the prophets? Well, I've done that now, and you disciples were witnesses of it."
Shalom,
Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots those that say they love me and keep not my law do not love me... If the law was abolished, do we make up our own law? Once saved always saved? Rapture? Easter? Ishtar. I personally would never give my only begotten to a populace that professes but does not practice.
I previously asked which they failed to respond and I am asking everyone on this youtube to remove the Brit Chadashah, and let's assume that the birth of Yeshua did not yet come to past. Now go to Jeremiah 31: and read verse 31 through 34 then respond to the following questions...
1) What is the subject being discussed? Yes, the law of God.
2) How is this covenant going to be different than the other and how it makes it new? According to the passage, the Law of God was written on Tablets of Stones and given to their fathers, the new covenant is about storing and writing them inwardly, a covenant made with the two houses (Israel and Judah) which is what makes it new, without removing the actual law of God.
With the above being said, now go to the Brit Chadashah, Hebrews 8:8-12 and you will see this fulfillment. Read verse 10 carefully, then you would understand what law God through the lips of Jeremiah was God referring to, and in verse 13 you will understand that decayed and waxed old does not imply that the law of God are done away with.
Let me make this clear, the law does not make one God's righteousness, we are made God's righteousness in Yeshua apart from the law, but the law allows one to walk a righteous walk before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, as Zacharias and his wife Elizabeth did.
The council of Nicaea is to be blamed for distorting true Scriptural teachings and God will bring judgement upon them for that and for engraving a lie in many that the law of God was done away with.
I have nothing against Rob, I believe he is a brethren in Yeshua, but he continues to speaks against the law of God, that they are done away with, literally going against Psalms 119:1 where it says, blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD. If you do not walk in the law of God you are then lawless, and according to Romans 8:5-8 you will see that the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be, they are in the flesh. Now, if you read verse 3, 4, you will see that by God sending Yeshua he condemn sin in the flesh so that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
I do not want you to agree with me, nor with Rob, what I like you to do is go to the Scriptures with both views and lean to the true teaching of the Brit Chadashah, what God made clear when he first spoke.
As previously stated, the law cannot save a person and never was it intended to do so, neither can it make a person God's righteousness, but to say that the law of God is done away with that is not Scriptural.
@@chrisharford7466 Of course, not. Although the Law of Moses is no longer in effect, the NT is very clear that we are not now lawless or free to make up our own rules.
Rob
God said His Law would NEVER change. How long is never? That’s right. So who are we gonna believe: some man, or God? Wake up, people
Thanks, Joseph! I highly recommend we all believe God and not some man! In this video, I showed how the Mosaic laws about the priesthood have changed, but the Law of God has not. Which part did you disagree with?
~Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots God gave the Mosaic Laws of the Priesthood, therefore, they can never change.
@@josephpack7315 Unless God changes them or does away with them.
@@dynamicsinDividends6636 except God said the covenant is ETERNAL. How long is eternal?
@@josephpack7315 A person that decides to remain a slave is to serve his master for olam does that me he becomes immortal or until he dies
Keeping YAHUAH's (God's name) commandments is how we show that we love John 14, 1st John 2:4, 1st John 3:3-11, Revelations 12:17, 14:12 and 22:14. YAHUSHA came not to destroy the law or commandments but to fulfill prophecy regarding Him in the scriptures. Please also read Romans 3:31. This is how we prepare for YAHUSHA's return. The gift of salvation is free but we must still work to show our obedience and to show that we love Him and His commandments are not grievous/burdensome 1st John 5:3.
Thanks! Romans 3:31 is pretty interesting. In that verse, the apostle Paul seems to be indicating that our faith in Jesus does not overthrow the law but, instead, upholds it. What does that mean exactly? Here's a video where I dig into that passage in context: czcams.com/video/X8on5zSXv0Q/video.html.
Blessings,
Rob
Hi, you responded to me very respectfully and I appreciate that. So thank you very much in doing so. However, you only addressed the scripture written by Paul. I have you several others, some were even from the Messiah's mouth. And while Paul's letters are for edification his letters are not scripture they are just that letters written from one brother to ppl. There was no "new testament" written when the apostles wrote their letters the scriptures that each was referring to was what ppl call the "old testament". I hope you read the scriptures I gave and pray and see if YAHUAH's Son came and did away with His laws if so he is a false prophet affording to Deuteronomy 13. Please read also 2 Peter 3:15-16. I'm only trying to help I pray that you look into what I've written.
We are instructed to work out our salvation with fear and trembling (Philippians 2:12,13), which produces obedience to God's law, but it is God which worketh in us to will and to do of his good pleasure. Another thing, it has nothing to do with earning salvation, we are saved by faith alone apart from the law and apart from works.
Your statement that the law of God is now expressed differently because of the work of Yeshua, is an opinion that you are giving and not Scriptural, and what you are doing is painting a pictures to fit your opinion. Your statement is like saying the bumble bee no longer have to move from plant to plant to collect pollen and nectar as a food source because now they can collect the pollen in the air. Just like the plant gives life to the bumble bee, Yeshua said to the teacher of the law (referring to the keeping of the law), do this and you shall live. Just like the bumble cannot live without the plant, a believer cannot live without the law of God, nothing to do with eternal salvation. Example, honor thy father and thy mother that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
Now, how is the commandment to "honor thy father and thy mother that thy days may be long" expressed differently? How is "blessed is the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD" expressed differently?
Rob, an expression is the action of making known one's thoughts or feelings about something, it is not about taking a statement and expressing it differently to change it. When God said, thou shall not commit adultery, that is a clear statement that cannot be expressed no other way, nor can it be changed, nor can one make it any clearer.
As I stated, I will send you everything about the council of nicaea, who have distorted true scriptural teaching, camouflaging their devious intentions so that they can cause Gentiles to depart from true Scriptural teachings. They have engraved into the minds of Gentile believers a lie that the law of God is done away, and sadly to say that you have been captured to believe that same lie, but in a different form. I need no opinions about what you think a verse means, just state what God made clear when he first spoke.
Why don't you read the conversation that Yeshua had with the teacher of law, then tell if he changed the expression of the law. The teacher of the law understand that two laws fulfilled the Decalogues, which is why Yeshua told him thou readest right, do this and you shall live. How clearer can one get with the statement that Yeshua made?
Respectfully,
Hello, Sam. You said, "Your statement that the law of God is now expressed differently because of the work of Yeshua, is an opinion that you are giving and not Scriptural"
What is unscriptural about it?
You said, "an expression is the action of making known one's thoughts or feelings about something"
And I am saying that it is Yahweh alone who is expressing His own laws. He is the perfect Father who knows what His children need. Scripture reveals that the unchanging Law of God has been _expressed_ to us in different ways throughout history. God expressed his unchanging principles differently to Adam than he did to Noah or Abraham or Moses. His _principles_ never changed, but his _expressions_ did. For example, one of God's unchanging principles is that atonement for sin comes through the shedding of blood (Lev 17:11). This was first expressed in the Garden when God made clothing out of animal skins (thus, requiring the shedding of blood) for Adam & Eve (Gen 3:21). It was expressed again when the blood of the Passover lamb saved the nation of Israel from God’s wrath (Exo 12). And later, under the Mosaic Covenant, it was expressed in the ritual animal sacrifices at the temple. And God’s unchanging principle of atonement was later expressed differently under the New Covenant through the “once for all” (Heb 10:10) sacrifice of Christ which saved God’s people from His wrath.
Scripture records this change, Sam. It is not my opinion. Under the Mosiac Law, blood sacrifices for sin were required (Lev 16). Under the New Covenant, because of Christ's sacrifice, "there is no longer any offering for sin" (Heb 10:18). But God's principle that "atonement for sin comes through the shedding of blood," has not changed. Under the New Covenant, Christians still have a sacrifice for atonement: it is the _eternal_ sacrifice of Christ (Heb 9:11-12). The sacrificial laws of Moses have ended, but the Law of God endures forever.
Shalom,
Rob
Rob, what is unscriptural about it is that Yeshua did not even express the law of God in any other form, he elaborate on laws, and neither do the Scriptures hints an expression of the law as you define it.
Correct, the LORD is the perfect Father who knows what His children need, just like you know exactly what your children need to allow them to walk a righteous walk so that they refrain from that which is wrong and against you. Obedience to God's law are stored and written inwardly so that we might not sin against God, not to mention, he was clear about his law.
It is safe to say that God gave verbal laws/commandments to Abraham, and he was obedient to God's laws and commandments, etc. (Genesis 26:5), then he put the laws/commandments on Tablets of Stones (most likely the same laws/commandments he gave Abraham), then he stored them inwardly (in the minds and hearts of men). Now, how are they expressed differently when it is all the same laws/commandments?
The example you gave about the atonement is different, you are talking about foreshadows, of something to come that would be fulfilled the sacrifices once and for all. Just like Aaron's priesthood, Yeshua could not come after the order of Aaron because if he did then he would have had to first make an offering for himself indicate he himself was a sinner. By coming after the order of the Melchizedek priesthood he made it clear that he did it once and for all and is the righteous priest, but that does not dismiss the law of God (the Decalogue and some other laws and commandments).
By the way, Pesach was about the memorial of the deliverance, which is why they still hold it, not to mention, it is an everlasting according to Scriptures.
Rob, though now we understand that the sacrifice/offering of a lamb to atone for the people was a foreshadow of the Lamb of God who would offer himself to fulfill it once and for all, it is not an expression, it is a fulfillment. Tell me, how is the Decalogue expressed now because of the work of Yeshua? I will tell you this, when one walks after the Spirit, the Spirit will fulfill the righteousness, but the law did not change.
I understand what you are saying, but I would not use the term expression. There are laws/commandments that are to be held and there are commandments that were to be observance or practice because they were foreshadows of something to come, ultimately being fulfilling in Yeshua, and he came not to destroy or remove, but to fulfill.
@@sundownsam3369 Actually, Sam, Yeshua _did_ express the Law of God in new forms. He gave new commands not found in the Torah. For example, there’s nothing in the Mosaic Law anything like:
“Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matt 28:19-20).
That passage contains at least four new commands. There is also Jesus’ teaching in John 15:1-17 (I am the vine, abide in me). Here He commands the People of God to abide in Him, not the temple, the Law, or even the Father. Christ is the true vine (v. 1). There is also "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you" (Matt 5:44). You won't find that in the Torah. (See also: Matt 4:19, 5:23-24, 5:34, 5:44; Mark 16:15; John 13:34.)
And there is a clear change on the issue of blood atonement. The Sinai Covenant required animal sacrifices. The New Covenant does not. Something changed. You used the term "fulfilled" and I think that is a perfect way to express it. But it is a change nonetheless. The Law of God requires blood sacrifice for sin and that never changed. Under the Law of Moses, this requirement was expressed through animal sacrifices at the temple. Under the New Covenant, however, this requirement was expressed in the sacrifice of Jesus "once for all" (Heb 10:10). To deny a change here is to deny scripture.
Shalom,
Rob
Rob, you are distorting Scriptures and the Brit Chadashah.
Of course the commission of making disciples out of all nation , etc. is not going to be in the Law of God (what you call the Mosaic Law), Yeshua was not yet born. Not to mention, your statement insinuates that the Law of God (what you call Mosaic Law) are done away with. Your statement is incongruous to the point of provoking laughter and I am not be sarcastic, nor disrespectful.
About loving your enemies, here are four verses and tell me what is they insinuating and if they are in harmony with love that enemies...
1) Exodus 23:4,5 If thou meet thine enemy’s ox or his ass going astray, thou shalt surely bring it back to him again. If thou see the ass of him that hateth thee lying under his burden, and wouldest forbear to help him, thou shalt surely help with him.
2) Pro 25:21 If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
3) Pro 24:17 Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth:
4) Pro 29:10 The bloodthirsty hate the upright: but the just seek his soul.
Do you agree that the above verses insinuates loving thy enemies?
Rob, I am not disagreeing with you on the blood atonement, I understand and believe that Yeshua atoned for our sins and did it once and for all, and I also stated it many a times. As stated, some of the commandments gave foreshadowed something to come that would fulfilled it, one of them was the atonement sacrifice, Yeshua did it once and for all.
But let's go back to your first paragraph... There is a difference between commandments that were given to walk a righteous walk, blameless and a commission command to preach to all nation; one is to walk and the order for salvation. Your statement lacks harmony.
@@sundownsam3369 Great! So we both agree that the laws requiring blood sacrifices for sin given in the Torah have ended. I like it when we agree on stuff, Sam.
R.
Hi again, so here is the issue with mainstream Christian thinking. You said,
"he said that to Israel ALONE....but then later, under the New Covenant with Christ as our HP, the apostle Peter declared all followers of Jesus, all christians whether jew or gentile are a chosen race." Correct, however, your duty as a bible student is to locate that theology(it is there) inside the TANAK. However, most christian dont do this, they blindly believe the NT words without studying them inside their proper hebraic concept and JEWISH cultural meaning. I defend the NT against non-believing Orthodox Jews,, but I can defend it properly inside its rightful context that otherwise shows the NT is restating whats already found in the Tanak. Most Mainstream Christians cannot. Most Mainstream christians come in and claim the NT has the authority to change what Tanak says.
I never contrast the NT as a new thing that came along and wiped out the OLD thing without showing proof the OLD thing stated this would occur. I also dont show the NT as claiming the New covenant being for anyone without showing first the Jeremiah 31:31-33 passage which clearly tell us this New covenant is for Judah and Israel. Rem, RL, you said, 'he that to Israel, ALONE' Well, he also said to Israel and Judah in the famous Jeremiah 31 passage that they too would be given the New cov. Now its your duty to locate where else in the Bible the Gentiles are allow in and HOW..... In short, we cant cherry pick, we MUST be consistent with our interpretation and explanation of the NT. The ONLY way to do that is to show where the OT Tanak predicts the New Covenant would state exactly what the New Testament states. Otherwise, we are making up our own misguided interpretation on the New Testament without its proper exegesis.
In short, why do you reject the Book of Mormon? Because it goes against the NT and the OT right? By this standard, this is the same thought process one should have with the *flawed* interpretations of NT when testing it against the OT. The NT is correct, however, the Mainstream interpretation of the NT is flawed. Can you understand why mainstream christian HAVE to ALWAYS use only the NT to show the NT is superior to the old? Why do you think you, nor anyone else can show this in the Old itself? It is there, you are simply missing it due to your theology which is mainstream. Hope this helps explain our position. Shalom
He has been using more Old Testament scripture in his vids that NT for the most part or at least an equal amount. You’re just upset your position is being challenged.
Also there is not a Hebraic New Testament. It was written in Greek only.
I previously asked which they failed to respond and I am asking everyone on this youtube to remove the Brit Chadashah, and let's assume that the birth of Yeshua did not yet come to past. Now go to Jeremiah 31: and read verse 31 through 34 then respond to the following questions...
1) What is the subject being discussed? Yes, the law of God.
2) How is this covenant going to be different than the other and how it makes it new? According to the passage, the Law of God was written on Tablets of Stones and given to their fathers, the new covenant is about storing and writing them inwardly, a covenant made with the two houses (Israel and Judah) which is what makes it new, without removing the actual law of God.
With the above being said, now go to the Brit Chadashah, Hebrews 8:8-12 and you will see this fulfillment. Read verse 10 carefully, then you would understand what law God through the lips of Jeremiah was God referring to, and in verse 13 you will understand that decayed and waxed old does not imply that the law of God are done away with.
Let me make this clear, the law does not make one God's righteousness, we are made God's righteousness in Yeshua apart from the law, but the law allows one to walk a righteous walk before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, as Zacharias and his wife Elizabeth did.
The council of Nicaea is to be blamed for distorting true Scriptural teachings and God will bring judgement upon them for that and for engraving a lie in many that the law of God was done away with.
I have nothing against Rob, I believe he is a brethren in Yeshua, but he continues to speaks against the law of God, that they are done away with, literally going against Psalms 119:1 where it says, blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD. If you do not walk in the law of God you are then lawless, and according to Romans 8:5-8 you will see that the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be, they are in the flesh. Now, if you read verse 3, 4, you will see that by God sending Yeshua he condemn sin in the flesh so that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
I do not want you to agree with me, nor with Rob, what I like you to do is go to the Scriptures with both views and lean to the true teaching of the Brit Chadashah, what God made clear when he first spoke.
As previously stated, the law cannot save a person and never was it intended to do so, neither can it make a person God's righteousness, but to say that the law of God is done away with that is not Scriptural.
You have clearly no understanding of the sacrificial laws of Leviticus and why or what they were for. And you are also not being honest as you are just generalizing sacrifices as they were all the same thing and they were all just because the Kohanim and the people needed daily Atonement for sin. That is a complete lie. You should go back to Leviticus and see what each sacrifice was for and the specifics of the requirements and for what sin they were or under which circumstances. Then give teaching. Also Jesus who you call the Passover lamb is literally representing the Egyptian god that was an abomination for HaShem and it was the lamb which they slaughtered to show the Egyptians that they are trusting HaShem and are not afraid of what the Egyptians will do if they see their god slaughtered. Exodus 8: 21 Thereupon, Pharaoh summoned Moses and Aaron, and he said, "Go, sacrifice to your God in the land."
22 But Moses said, "It is improper to do that, for we will sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians to God our Lord. Will we sacrifice the deity of the Egyptians before their eyes, and they will not stone us? So the Passover lamb was an abomination to HaShem and it was the god of the Egyptians, it was never a sacrifice for any sin, HaShem never said to them that they have sinned and they need to sacrifice lambs so that HaShem could forgive them and take them out of Egypt.
This is the gospel of the lawless one. Repent!
Hello, Joan! At the end of this video I concluded, "The priestly laws of Moses have ended, while the Law of God endures forever." I'm curious which part of that statement you disagree with?
Shalom,
Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots The "Law of Moses" is the Law of God. Moses didn't come up with it himself. The commandments, statutes, and right rulings are given as ordinances that teach us how to obey the summary of the whole Law, which is love God, love others. Without these directives we then fill in the gaps with philosophy and our own logic. For this reason the church is in the sinful state it is in. These laws we are told to keep over 280 times from Genesis to Revelation. Psalm 119:142 Your righteousness is everlasting righteousness, your Torah is Truth. When did Father's instruction no longer become truth and everlasting? When did God change even though it is written that He never changes. Paul said many will be in strong delusion because they did not love the TRUTH. Christianity, as the doctrine given since early church fathers and Constantine, is coming to its logical conclusion. The church is becoming lawless because of the lies we inherited from our fathers. The proof texted verses the church uses to explain away Father's ways do not go with he flow of scripture. Please reconsider your stance and presuppositions. Yahusha (Jesus) said Himself in John 3:36 that belief and obedience are synonymous. If we do not believe what He taught us is applicable for us then we are denying who He is and worshipping a distorted false version of Him. Please, I beg of you, I don't want anyone to hear "depart from Me, I never knew you who works lawlessness." Return to the Father's ways (Jeremiah 6:16). This has been the Gospel since the beginning.
@@joanmcsweeney5547 *If salvation could be found in keeping the Mosaic Law, there would have been no need for Jesus Christ. - Gal **2:21*
Jesus Himself made it very clear to the Law keeping Pharisees, who thought because of their heritage and strict observances of the Law, that it was not by their works they would be saved, but by believing in His works true salvation is found.
The Gospel, i.e. the Good News is, according to Scripture, that *Jesus Christ [Savior, Advocate, Mediator, Redeemer] died on the cross for our sins and paid our death penalty. That He was buried and raised on the 3rd day. That’s the gospel; believing in the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ. - 1 Cor 15:1-11*
In reading your comments I can see your zeal, but it seems you are promoting a “work based” religion by saying we must keep the Law. Even the Israelites themselves could not keep the entirety of the Law, which incidentally comprises of the 10 commandments along with 613 other commandments. *So why are you imposing this heavy load on your brothers and sisters when you yourself cannot do it?*
Again, I understand and appreciate the zeal you have, but it’s misguided. You quoted John 3:36 saying that Jesus said belief and obedience are synonymous. However the words in the Scripture are *“not obey”* not the word “obedience”. The words *“not obey”* in this context is in contrast to the word *“belief”* in that it means to *“reject” or “deny”.* So in context Jesus is saying the one who *believes* in Him will have eternal life. However the one who does *”not obey”, i.e. rejects* Him will not see eternal life, but God’s wrath remains. *Context is key and eisegesis should never be applied when interpreting Scripture.*
Final thoughts…The Church is not becoming lawless because of the lies we inherited from our fathers as you claim. Lies are the language of the devil (John 8:44). The Holy Spirit forewarned in *1 Tim 4:1-2 that in the last days apostasy would happen because people choose to abandon the faith and to follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons being influenced by liars with seared consciences.* However to combat that, followers of Christ have a responsibility to proclaim the true Word of God, providing sound doctrine, the true Gospel. *That’s being done here in this video.* We are not saved by our works (Eph 2:8-9). We are not saved by keeping the Law. *We are saved ONLY by the finished work of Jesus Christ, our Messiah. 1 John 5:1-2 says ONLY those that believe that Jesus is the Christ [Messiah] is born of God and those that are God’s children loves God and do His commandments.* And what are His commandments? *To love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and to love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets. - Matt **22:36**-40.*
Again, we are not saved by keeping the Mosaic Law. If there is any Law kept, it is the Law of Christ (1 Cor 9:21) which is what Jesus spoke to in Matt 22:36-40. We keep this Law because of our love for Him, not because of legalism or a means to salvation.
@@mrsmorgann0000 who do you think gave the law to Moses. We are saved by grace so that we may walk in obedience. Father's ways is what separates us and sanctify us. What is sin? 1 John 3:4 transgression of the law. To say that Jesus said to no longer obey Father's instruction is dangerous. Does God change? Jesus died so we can come back into covenant with Father. He said that He came only for the house of Israel. Do you know who they are? Do you know who the new covenant was promised to. It's all in scripture. There must be a consistent flow to doctrine. The Bible does truly interpret itself but we seem to feel that God is ok by filling in our own philosophical righteousness.
Thanks, Joan. You asked, "When did Father's instruction no longer become truth and everlasting?" And my answer is never! The Father's instructions are true and everlasting.
You asked, "When did God change even though it is written that He never changes." My answer is never! God is perfect and, thus, does not change. (I said as much in this video.)
At the end of the video I concluded, "The priestly laws of Moses have ended, while the Law of God endures forever." Which part of that statement do you disagree with?
Rob
This is not true. His Torah is very well in effect today. 1 John 3:4 says sin is transgression of the TORAH law. How then can we do away with his law if his law shows us what sin is? It is the LAW of sin and death that was nailed to the stake, not HIS LAW. Yahusha is the WALKING TALKING TORAH law. REPENT of these lies.
Hi, Priscilla! The text of 1 John 3:4 actually does not mention the Torah. Neither does the context of that passage which runs from 2:28-3:10. The text says that sin is lawlessness (anomia); meaning rebellion, living as a law unto ourselves rather than submitting to God. If sin = transgression of the Law of Moses, then Adam and Eve never sinned.
Shalom,
Rob
sin is transgression of his Torah. Let me ask you this. Are the ten commandments done away with? Do we get to pick and choose what not to do vs what to do? Did not messiah Yahusha say himself he did NOT come to destroy the Torah law but to FULFILL? Matthew 5:17
czcams.com/video/5vD8RZYlWi0/video.html
I come in love bc I want NONE to perish. Many are deceived and are deceiving others. I promise you we are not to add or take away from his word. His Torah is still very much in effect no Easter christmas birthdays many many things he hates that this world does. Pharmekia the j a b etc. REPENT the KING IS COMING! His sabbath is very much still for today and also it is Saturday NOT sunday. REPENT
@@peculiarpriscilla7777 That is a very limited and isolated viewpoint of what sin is. If sin simply was transgression of his Torah as you claim, what do you call what Adam and Eve did in the Garden of Eden? The Torah was not around during that time and yet they both sinned. Hence the predicament humanity is in now and why we desperately need a Mediator, i.e. Savior.
Sin means the practice of lawlessness or unrighteousness - 1 John 3:4
Sin means following short of the glory of God. - Rom 3:23
Sin means doing something against someone, e.g. God or another. - Exo 10:16
Sin means doing the opposite of righteousness or not doing the righteous thing. - Gal 5:17; James 4:17
Sin means doing something that is not from faith - Rom 14:23
The 9 of the 10 commandments encompasses of the moral law and of course it’s not done away with. The 10 commandments were given to the Israelites and yet, even the Gentiles instinctively follow them (Rom 2:14-16). But Jesus said I came to fulfil the Law and the Prophets meaning those elements, i.e. the Law and Prophets were ultimately pointing and prophesying of Messiah and He being the Word of God, fulfil exactly what was spoken of Him.
Of course we do not pick and chose what we want to do. That is a demonic theology, i.e. “Do what thy wilt.” However as followers of Christ, we are no longer under the requirements of the law, but under the freedom of God’s grace. That certainly doesn’t mean we have a license to sin. We are still bound obligated to the law written in our hearts - Rom 2:15.
@@mrsmorgann0000 Torah simply means God's instructions. Are you saying we have the freedom to disobey God? The word Torah is in Genesis 26:5. That is before the Law of Moses.
All of the Ten Commandments are the Law of God. The Seventh-day Sabbath has existed since creation week and has not been fulfilled. There is no way to change what God made holy.
You wrote, "Of course, we do not pick and chose what we want to do." I agree, but whether you know it or not, that is what you are saying. You pivot between defining Grace as having the freedom to sin and saying, "That certainly doesn’t mean we have a license to sin." Which is it, sin or freedom to sin?
If it isn’t Catholic, it’s not the bible
That's an interesting take, Michael@ When you say "Catholic" are you referring to the Roman Catholic Church?
~Rob
Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. 1 John 3:4
Did not Moses give you the law, and yet none of you keepeth the law? Why go ye about to kill me? John 7:19
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven. Matthew 5:17-20
Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant stone, lest they should hear the law, and the words which the LORD of hosts hath sent in his spirit by the former prophets: therefore came a great wrath from the LORD of hosts. Zechariah 7:12
He that keepeth the law of the Lord getteth the understanding thereof: and the perfection of the fear of the Lord is wisdom. 12He that is not wise will not be taught: but there is a wisdom which multiplieth bitterness. Ecclesiasticus 21:11-12
Whoso feareth the Lord will receive his discipline; and they that seek him early shall find favor. 15He that seeketh the law shall be filled therewith: but the hypocrite will be offended thereat. 16They that fear the Lord shall find judgment, and shall kindle justice as a light. 17A sinful man will not be reproved, but findeth an excuse according to his will. Ecclesiasticus 32:14
I have hated falsehood and loathe it, Your Torah I have loved. Psalms 119:163
Great peace have those loving Your Torah, And for them there is no stumbling-block. Psalms 119:165
And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him; Hebrews 5:9
Blessed is the man whom thou chastenest, O LORD, and teachest him out of thy law; Psalm 94:12
Salvation is far from the wicked: for they seek not thy statutes. Psalm 119:155
For at that time the lamp of the eternal Torah which exists forever and ever illuminated all those who sat in darkness. This (lamp) will announce to those who believe the promise of their reward and to those who deny the punishment of the fire which is kept for them. 2 Baruch 59:2
This is the book of the commandments of God, and the LAW that endureth for ever: all they that keep it shall come to life; but such as leave it shall die. Baruch 4:1
And justly do they perish who have not loved your Torah, and the torment of judgment shall await those who have not submitted themselves to your power. 2 Baruch 54:14
Go, therefore, now during these days and instruct the people as much as you can so that they may learn lest they die in the last times, but may learn so that they live in the last times. 2 Baruch 76:5
And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them. Ezekiel 36:27
But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my LAW in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jeremiah 31:33
For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put MY LAWS into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people: Hebrews 8:10
This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put MY LAWS into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them; Hebrews 10:16
For their enemies[e] deserved to be deprived of light and imprisoned in darkness, those who had kept thy sons imprisoned, through whom the imperishable LIGHT of the LAW was to be given to the world. Wisdom 18:4
Thanks, Rachel! At the end of this video I concluded, "The priestly laws of Moses have ended, while the Law of God endures forever." I'm curious which part of that statement you disagree with?
Shalom,
Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots Rob, just clarifying because you said the Torah Keeping Christian Movements were erroneous, and scripture is clear, the Torah is forever. Yahusha came to make this known to us and walk them out as a perfect example for us to follow. Shalom!
And justly do they perish who have not loved your Torah, and the torment of judgment shall await those who have not submitted themselves to your power. 2 Baruch 54:14
Go, therefore, now during these days and instruct the people as much as you can so that they may learn lest they die in the last times, but may learn so that they live in the last times. 2 Baruch 76:5
And I answered and said to them: Shepherds and lamps and fountains came from the Torah and when we go away, the Torah will abide.If you, therefore, look upon the Torah and are intent upon wisdom, then the lamp will not be wanting and the shepherd will not give way and the fountain will not dry up. 2 Baruch 77:15-16
3 Therefore thou didst provide a flaming pillar of fire as a guide for thy people’s[d] unknown journey, and a harmless sun for their glorious wandering.
4 For their enemies[e] deserved to be deprived of light and imprisoned in darkness, those who had kept thy sons imprisoned, through whom the imperishable light of the law was to be given to the world. Wisdom 18:3-4
@@rachelfortruth8183 did you watch his video?
@@rachelfortruth8183 Thanks, Rachel. While Baruch and Wisdom are important historical writings, I do not recognize them as Scripture. The Torah, on the other hand, *is* God-breathed Scripture and I am not claiming it has been done away with or has ended. Every Christian Bible starts with the Torah, it is Holy Scripture and will endure forever. But the Torah contains much more than just the Law. And I am saying that the Mosaic Law is no longer in effect. It was a guardian or tutor given to guide God's people to Christ, and now that Christ has come, they are no longer under a guardian (Gal 3:24-25).
Blessings,
Rob
@@John3.36 Yes, I watched it twice just to be sure. Not here for discord. I shared scripture. You can accept it or reject it.