'Russia May Use Tactical Nuclear Weapons On Ukraine' I Will Putin Be First To Use Nukes Since WW II?
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 06. 2024
- The war in Ukraine seems to have reached a stalemate. Neither the Russian forces are able to declare victory nor the Ukrainian soldiers are able to push the Russians out of Ukraine. This stalemate is frustrating Putin as Russia warn of using tactical nuclear weapons. What are these weapons and what will be the consequence of using one? All this and much more in this week's DeCode.
#Russia #Putin #NuclearWeapon #Ukraine
0:00 - INTRODUCTION
1:25 - HOW REAL IS PUTIN’S NUCLEAR THREAT?
3:20 - HOW POWERFUL ARE TACTICAL NUKES?
4:17 - PUTIN’S NUCLEAR THREAT: REAL OR BLUSTER?
5:29 - ESCALATE TO DE-ESCALATE
7:15 - COULD USE OF TACTICAL NUKES BE SELF-DEFEATING?
9:21 - IMPLICATIONS OF PUTIN PRESSING THE NUKE BUTTON
CRUX is your daily video news guide to the big events that are shaping our world. We track news, geopolitics, diplomacy and defence strategies and explain how they shape national policies. Crux makes sense of global developments, and analyses their impact on daily lives.
Follow CRUX on Instagram (@crux.india): bit.ly/3qSFx1K
Follow CRUX on Facebook: bit.ly/2Lte7iF
#GetCloserToTheNews with latest headlines on politics, sports and entertainment on news18.com bit.ly/2Y4QccL
Also watch:
Crux Decode: bit.ly/3MjzIoG
Crux+ : bit.ly/35mm97B
Crux Most Watched: bit.ly/3KhJ8iX
Amazing how calmly people talk about a possible nuclear strike like they might miss a mortgage payment.
its funny how people don't realize how close it is and how quick things can escalate
so true
@Happiness makes the world go round there’s lot of unhappy people in the world due to society so don’t suppose they care.
Here in Ukraine we're just making jokes about it. Well, some are really afraid, me - if Ukraine is going to die, if Kiev is going to be nuked - I want to die with it.
@@Ddragon173 surviving won’t be much fun. People won’t last long before anarchy, disease and when medical and food runs out 🤯
MAD. As a cold war kid, I thought such lunacy was over. The fear I had as a child is returning to a new generation.
Αυτά που διχνουν ατομική βόμβα είναι από δοκιμές ατομικών βομβών στην Νεβάδα των ΗΠΑ
Lunacy is never over. Its a constant threat. Just like Trump.
I think he's gonna do it. Just because he thinks he can get away with it. I'm going to bed...
@@bipl8989 Under Trump administration, there is no war at all. Only Obama and Biden did start the war. I am Vietnamese and I think you are so stupid to think Trump is a threaten
@@phanhophuong9422 Under trump we were the closest we've ever been to world peace.
"The very first and only nuclear device to be used in a war."
Proceeds to mention the second bomb.
@Luis Ventura It was WW2. Strategic bombings weren't considered a war crime.
@Luis Ventura, if they didn’t drop them, an estimated 10m Japanese and 5m Americans would have died instead of 500k
@@FireOccator i dont care what was or was not considered by you a war crime, killing innocent people and kids is a war crime
@@raduromanesti6408 Try winning wars, without civilian casualties, then.
@@FireOccator that was needless civilian casualties. Its already proven that Japan is losing and the war was about to end. US is a cancer of humanity. They have no principle.
Russia hasn't even used it's bear claw or super sonic bombers yet but people think tactical nukes are next??
Heyyyyyy!!! Someone with some common sense with all this, glad to see someone else with their head screwed on all the way.
Russian weapons have turned out to be crap. Too many hand$
in the pot, too much skimming.
Too much hypocrisy and rotten civility in this world, shoot the nukes
Why would he? They’re for long range strategic options and he doesn’t want them shot down. You’ll not use such when tactical are available. Study the difference.
@@Sana-mb6ig Russia will use a tactical nuke mark my words.
Article five doesn't really apply here though, being that Ukraine isn't a NATO member. I don't disagree that they would forced into a position of expected response up to and including nuclear weapons, but not necessarily by article five.
They will just sanction 3 more banks and 5 more firms
@@Lemosa3414 You're not wrong. Sadly, much as has been seen in other countries, the elites tend to pass the costs and 'externalities' of a sanctions regime down to the poorest in the nation, then use it as an excuse to stoke nationalist sympathy against foreign actors. North Korea is a good example of this.
I was thinking the same
The USA isn’t really one to talk the launched multiple nukes in japan and after seeing the damage still kept going. For the u.s to condemn them is hypocritical
@@omaramaya2893 facts
If we make it intact as a civilization to the 2030s decade we would be the luckiest creatures in the universe
There seems to be some confusion delineating the difference between "tactical weapons" and "strategic weapons". I'll try to clarify it as best as I understand it myself. "Tactical" is akin to "mobile" or "smaller" while "strategic" is akin to "stationary" or "large scale". Strategic nuclear weapons are those usually found in silos and in the bomb bays of planes and typically have a much higher yield in comparison. Tactical nuclear weapons are typically what you see on cruise missiles or the occasional artillery with the capability of firing specially modified rounds with nuclear tips. These tend to be of much smaller yields. Hope that clears it up a little.
THe news anchor explained what they are, no need to explain it here
@@richardpress9551 no one asked
Also tactical nuke also can be shoot down and interspedead
In a sense there is no difference between tactical and strategic nuclear weapons. On detonation they both leave their signatory radioactive fallout with attendant 100-year lasting adverse effects.
Now Noth Korea has also a mobile strategic nuke ICBM and they just test today.
A tactical nuclear weapon has more to do with the yield of the weapon, not the distance
it travels to target. A ballistic missile could also carry a tactical nuclear warhead. And a
'strategic' nuclear weapon could be fired a short range or dropped from a plane after a
short flight.
It can get crazy fast
It also has very short half life which strategic nuclear missile systems do not. Strategic nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles are to inflict mass casualties and destroy infrastructure and make it uninhabitable long periods of time. It would work using a long half life nuclear component in a tactical nuclear weapon. If you plan to send your soldiers to play in your neighbors' playground you just nuked! They should not have to worry about sucking up nuclear radiation from their own government.
@@noneyadamnbiznezz Never heard of the shorter half life theory. There'd be less fissile material in a small bomb, so of course a smaller area. But a tactical nuclear weapon
will still destroy everything in it's blast zone
as in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. A dirty bomb is one dropped at ground zero altitude.
Putin will probably use poison gas on a population before using nukes. Putin used chemical weapons on civilians in Syria and I think in Chechnya as well
@@haruruben Stupid mor*on, everybody knows US was behind white helmets CW false flags, /children from Mariupol tell how Azov militants shot them in the legs, Russian troops are moping up neighborhoods in Mariupol and other events of the special operation on March 27.
A wise woman once said
"Once he putin, he don't pull out"
Lmao🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Once he Putin,he don't Biden out!
Bruhhhhh 🤣🤣
I hope this doesn't escalate to nuclear exchange. 🙏
Nuclear war will happens soon because of USA/Nato, look Russia attack Ukraine suppose to end in shorter time but it become harder because westen is backup Ukraine and turn up more people is going to suffer. not to mention hate between Russia and west increase.
@@sleepybear5069 what? So nuclear war is going to happen because NATO has helped Ukraine? NATO and the world should have done nothing? Your equation starts off with the ignorance of the key fact. Russia invaded Ukraine. Had Russia not invaded Ukraine, NATO would not of help Ukraine.
@@toddleva Yes, the world should do nothing and let Russia do the job. Do you know who is arming Ukrainian long time ago, this people are mostly neo nazi/white supremacist/far right azov/whatever. Do you even know who you're support. I mean we all feel sad for innocent people, we need this case end as soon as posible so people can go home, but what happpened now is US don't want to end, I believe US is the key to end this war just negotiate with Russia but they keep sending weapon. I guest western want to use this opportunity to destroy Russia economy so at the end Nuclear war can't be avoid.
I hope India doesn't start arming and feeding and training the Russian horde and escalate this thing. Namaste.
SHIT THIS IS A LITTLE SCAREY I WAS GOING TO LIVE IN BENELUX COUNTRY WELL SEE BY ELECTION TIME####
If I am to die in a nuclear war, all the matters to me at the end of my life is that I am right with God, forgiven of all sin....and that my name is written in His book of life....Then a whole new chapter begins...at home for all eternity with the One who has always loved me
There will be war if the jerks in the west keep poking the bear to make Profit. Find God and Prep. There was 70% survival in Japan nukes. will be less cause the yields are larger, but some of us will survive. You can tell our govt. thinks shit of us, cause there has been no training or stocking of shelter for the people. Now Russia has drills every year and actually evacuates over a million from the city. They have shelters. Why, they feel threaten with ours and Nato missiles on their borders. That is why Ukraine, but no one listened or cared. We will get to learn the hard way.
THE END TIME SIGNS ARE UPON US
most religions used fear like this to make people follow and to control them. fear is the key for power and victory. that's why many russians Soliders died Cuz the did not made ukrainian fear by dropping thousands of strikes in kyiv the night of 24 of February and they still have electricity. imagine winning a war this way. pure Stupidness and sympathy from putin.
It's real because they have it, it's not a threat that come from a country that didn't have. Putin may use it if threaten
Well yeah Russia alone against 30 nation that's part of nato ofcourse they gonna nuke them 😒. What would America do in the same situation destroy everything and keep moving. Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki they were full of civilians living there they killed alot of innocent people.
Absolutely true, NATO and evil US regime doesn't know when to stop, leaves Putin no choice but to resort to nuclear option and get the job done.
@@marshalljulie3676 Compared to that the ones that are going to be used are 6 to 7 times stronger. Putin is a madman to even consider it.
Spsgdgsgasgsgssgssgsgsaaa@@marshalljulie3676dsa dgssgsgsaapssgssu
@@johnsilver9338 that is if he uses it he hast. I'm talking about an event that already happened and has affected people lives until today. Nato is still provoking Russia even after years of warning. You are going to get a reaction if you keep pushing people into a corner. If nato puts missiles in Ukraine where can Russia physically retreat to the ocean?? Ukraine is a buffer zone and should have been left alone but instead the us and friends decided it would be a good Idea to train and arm nazis to the teeth while funding and managing over 20 military bio labs in Ukraine... people are being ignorant about the real situation they are stuck on the notion that Russia bad they don't think anymore just accept what the tv said. Plus Russia found Corona virus in these labs that means us has been in possession of the virus way before the pandemic Americans better start getting intelligent fast before they become another experiment. Some still believe covid doesn't exist some believed it was just a flu it's these people ended in hospitals begging for oxygen some are dead the virus doesn't affect everyone the same way just compare Africa and America. Africa has less covid deaths because people eat more fruits and vegetables and their immune system is naturally stronger than people that eats pasta burgers chips and pizza over and over again
Nah, he wouldn’t. He needs to take Ukraine in one piece.
He is withdrawing troops so it will be over soon I think.
@@gbjanuary Either bad news or good news. Good news if he's withdrawing and planning to give up and stop the war, bad news is if he's just preparing a nuclear strike so his troops won't be in the way. Don't really think he's gonna give up anytime soon though...
Revelation 8:10-11
“The third angel blew his trumpet, and a great star fell from heaven, blazing like a torch, and it fell on a third of the rivers and on the springs of water. The name of the star is Wormwood. A third of the waters became wormwood, and many people died from the water, because it had been made bitter.”
@@MC-nf3js I think he is tactically withdrawing and will try again maybe when better equipped.
Watching this.. I couldn't help but think of the chain reaction if a nuclear weapon was used near Chernobyl... What a hell of a mushroom cloud of radiation.. and it would blow back on Russia.. like burning a brush pile with the window open 👍
The whole reason for this war between Russia and Nato is about money.... Why piss away expensive nukes on places where nobody lives to begin with.
Very frightening.
Time to set egos aside and pray for Negotiations
A ludo player playing chess with professional grandmaster. Every one knows ludo player has only pawns left and checkmate is immanent but ludo player still want to play till end and keep sacrificing his pawns.
@@madmantheory5216
I hope not because we will all lose.
No negotiating, Putin wants unconditional surrender of Ukraine
Ego, not egos - Putin's ego. He ordered this war, he can order a tactical nuke, or he can order the military to cease operations.
I've worked 17 years with a Russian who came to the USA in 1989 and he says"Never trust a Russian".
@@rancherfarmerguy Don't get dejected dear have some potassium Iodide
Let me clear this up.
A "tactical" nuclear monkey thrown at a bunch of birds would reduce the bunch of birds to smouldering ashes, leaving nearby monkey forces unharmed.
A "strategic" nuclear monkey thrown at a bunch of birds would reduce the bunch of birds, the monkeys, and the forest to smouldering ashes leaving only irradiated cockroaches to celebrate their new place in the forest/wasteland hierarchy.
You're welcome.
With the annoying side-effect being that even a single tactical nuclear monkey wildly increases the risk that all other monkey-capable nations let loose their entire barrel of monkeys at once. Which would be unfortunate for monkeys and birds everywhere.
@@montlejohnbojangles8937 yeah if Russia does that then everything is going to hit the fan and currently if Russia has over 5,977 warheads then they could use those powerful weapons against the U.S. or the UK or any other countries that have supported Ukraine
I dont think Putin would nuke Ukraine. I do however think he would nuke NATO countries or the US if they intervene. If he did by chance nuke Ukraine we would see Russian troops pulling back or moving away from an area they intend to nuke.
I don’t understand why people say this ^^ Why exactly do you think this? If Putin does this he would get nuked back! Do you think he could just nuke NATO and get off freely? 😂
Same thought. Putin will use real nukes against NATO countries (not Ukraine)... only if things goes worse for Russians. He's very stubborn guy.
The doctrine of Russian tactical n strategic missiles r indeed interesting. So do with their anti-aircraft n anti-missile system. Nato n US have good in defense, their weapons r good in defending, not brutal offensive system. Whereas Russians having brut offensive doctrines that r unstoppable. Or Russia could b suicidal, blasting a Tsar bomb at a specific crate in artic or in Pacific will rip this planet apart, whether anybody know it or not! So ppl in the west n that Ukrainian clown should drop ego n stop escalating the situation. These fools r playing with fire n laughing with an emoji. Stop nato expansion eastward as promised, implement Minsk agreement, stop killing ppl in donbass n Luhansk.
No he will nuke Ukraine ,the chances is he knows many have left n attacking NATO first with nukes risk getting one back or both country would be finish.Ukraine by now is almost flatten n most population has left except army n soldiers imo.Good bet
He will not pullback anyone... He will kill his own army. Those poor guys dont even know why they are in Ukraine
About a week before the first Space Shuttle disaster occurred, I had a dream that it crashed on landing. My dream was wrong, it crashed during takeoff.
Last night I had a dream that Russia was using strange weapons against the U.S. including nukes. But what scared me the most is that the nukes were detonated up high with thousands of dart-like penitrators in them. I pray I'm wrong and dreams are just unconscious fears of our daily lives. I'm a child of the Cuban Missile Crisis, so I'm re-living the dream.
The weapon your talking about is called the battle ax, an it’s a bomb that can be dropped 60000’.
@@Daniel_Martin777 This isn't a nuke but a cluster dart like mini missiles.
In this case NATO has no other option but to respond with equal magnitude...
Disagree, only likely winning option, is to go full scale "first", wipe the jerk out once and for all.
@Pakistanis with Katilulli simple answer: OVERPOPULATION, the rich have bought nuclear bunkers in New Zealand, they will survive. The rest of people will die in a nuclear holocaust.
@Pakistanis with Katilulli No, but brought up with the threat(born in 58), and it has always been on the agenda as a possibility, or at times said to be very likely. So now i've got to an age, where i think nuclear deteriants have zero value, unless ready to go full out in a first strike, basically if they do go nuclear, it would be time to put up, or shut up.
Nato allies will all be disintegrated and vanished in thin air before retaliation.
@Pakistanis with Katilulli Or Let him win, and let the slow take over of the world by self serving megalomaniacs continue. Should we just turn a blind eye as well, when china has a go at Taiwan, i say say make a stand now against russia, and any who join them.
“I hope the Russians love their children too” - Sting
If pukin uses them he will invite a terrible retaliation. He must know that.
noone ever had hundreds of thousands of nuclear warheads-thank god!!
No they have thousands
Do you realise how stupid using tactical nukes would be...?
Using tactical nukes means you have immediately LOST the war....
Tell me why you think that, honestly please?
I dont get it either
Tactical nuclear weapons are normally fired from artilliary pieces , like the American M110.....these are used in theatres of war
Putin is threatening to use low yield nuclear weapons like nuclear artillery shells or nukes on cruise missiles. Some of the first North Korean nukes fit into the tactical nuke category. The USA also has tactical nuclear weapons too. As one who grew up with the Bomb - I would say the nastier element of nukes is the radioactive fallout. The cleanest nuke is the neutron bomb and EMP weapons. Radioactive fallout has the same problem as chemical weapons... depending on the way the wind blows ... one could risk being hoisted by one's own petard. Any use of nuclear weapons would leave a radioactive signature. EMP weapons would wipe out civilians but most mil std stuff will survive to live another day ... if Putin is seriously thinking of deploying such weapons then you'll also see the Russian generals who are worth half a lick sending out Russian NBC monitoring vehicles into the battlefield. Most nuclear weapon ready military forces have these Nuclear Biological Chemical monitor vehicle to detect radiation fallout, chemical or biological weapons usage on the battle field ... they are used to tell central command and field commanders about the NBC risks in the battlefield. The military NBC soldiers wear PAPR w NBC filters and PPE bunny suits....you can't miss'em. NATO has tactical nukes too so there is a risk of a tit for tat tactical nuke exchange. I would say the biggest risk of a nuclear exchange is not the nuclear explosions themselves but a famine when radioactive fallout poisons the regional food and water supply. Btw: iodine tablets might not be all that useful in preventing radiation poisoning of the thyroid. .
I'll wear ppe be fine eh?..
Nice information. Thanks. İ will add US used this nuc so Russia can anytime... NATO cant stop him otherwise world totally destroyed... İ think best way this comedian president must go his bosses home and putin will go home...very clear comedian trying to mix nato into war...
‘The NBC monitor says 3.6... not great, not terrible’
@M. DJ yep
EVAPORATION OR BURNT
TO DEATH AND SLOW AND AGONISING DEATH BY THE RADIATION WERE
STRONTIUM (SR) ARE
O N E OF THE MOST LEATHAL COMPONENTS OF KILLING RADIATION!
IT ATTACS THE WHITE BODY AND ESPECIALLY THE BONEMARROW WHERE THE BLOOD IS BUILT AND DISTRIBUTÖR TO THE BODY!
WATCH HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI EFFECTS OF THERMONUCLEAR BOMBS!
If he does it will be his final error!
The purpose of Russian nuclear weapons are all Anglo-Saxon countries without exception, they will be the first to be destroyed in the event of a war, there is no sense for Russia to launch a nuclear strike on Ukraine, the Anglo-Saxons will destroy Russia's main enemy
They'll live on in their Bunkers we our the ones who really pay
The war in Ukraine was coldly calculated
2022 is the yr... the yr a possible WW3 and the yr I was first able to get a graphics card ( rtx 3060ti) to play elder ring and now it's possibly a waste since I might die in selective service. I'm excited to what 2023 brings
Alien invasion
@@D.2601 NO. A black hole will enter the Solar System and swallow the Sun 😊
Alíen invasión after earths forces are weakened and divided from. Ww3???
In 2023, the earth will be stone age and we living in that era if we still alive lol
Is the RTX 3060 12gb worth it for the price than an RTX 3060 TI?
Wow a Crux video with an actual narrator instead of text balloons 👍🏻
Yes, I was shocked too.
russia's TOS-1 rocket launcher is comparable to a tactical nuke. he could use that instead.
Russia did already
@@phanhophuong9422 There is no evidence of that, some TOS-1 do not use thermobaric warheads
I think he will Emp Ukraine. does not effect any Nato country and will blind all modern weapon systems and communications. If it is true Putin is taking heavy loses It has to be they are getting satellite intel and secure communications. Ionized the sky and Ukraine is back to a third world country taking on goliath.
If and when he uses the TOS we will see the mother of all shock and awe and will proof Putin has been taking it easy on the Ukrainians.
Prayers that reveals who really is with Putin and know we what he was going to do and his plans for this way back.
The use of tactical nuke in 1945 ended the war but if it was used now the war would be escalated. Or would it? Not too sure anymore, NATO might pretend that it's just another volcano eruption.
Partially agree but Hiroshima nuke killed 100000 civilians in few minutes and affected generations after???
So did US was ewer punished for that? Remind me please
@@beekeepinginaustraliabyala9825 Why the fuck should US be punished in 1945? Japan had an evil regime which killed 30 million people in Asia, so 150 000 civilians killed compared to 30 million is a drop in the sea. And Japan hasn't apologised to China or Korea for millions of civilians killed. Even when the most liberal president Barack Obama visited Hiroshima, he reefused to apologise for the dropped nukes because in 1945 there were no legal treaties that protected civilians in conflicts. Therefore stop judging actions taken in ww2 by today's standards ok?
@@beekeepinginaustraliabyala9825 Why would US be punished for acting in self defense and bringing about the end of WW2 and creating relative world peace for the next 70 years?! They dropped the bomb because the Japanese would not stop attacking US and to show the world that the war was no longer worth fighting with such weapons in possession
@M. DJ Strategic or tactical in the circumstances they're all practical. It's all fair in love and WAR. Nukes might not come into play straight away but they cannot be ruled out totally either. If Ukraine takes advantage of the present momentum and tries to chase the Russians out of Donbas and Crimea, Putin will be forced to display shock and awe as a game-changer.
@@beekeepinginaustraliabyala9825 but russia drew most civilians out of cities. So it's possible. Who knows.
Even it is unfortunate, Russia must fight to the end to stop unipolar world whatever means necessary.
Agreed
One pundit said we will see a game change in about 10 days. That was last week.
They have their existential threat.. a standing NATO army on their doorstep.
No one wants or has wanted to attack Russia. This is a land grab. Let’s all be real here. An attack on Russia is just outrageous, see what’s happening to Russians in Ukraine? That’s what would happen to anyone invading Russia. It’s just not worth it. Putin is taking land because he can. Putin is more likely to kill a Russian than any Ukrainian.
Worth noting of Russia's nuclear arsenal of 2000 nukes, probably less than half that are likely to still be functional. Still way too many though.
@M. DJ It's just not possible for Russia to still have anywhere near that many functioning nukes.
Beautiful analysis and presentation ; just one correction, Ukrane is yet to become a NATO member, hence it is not a war on NATO and its allies, therefore, NATO cannot go on a nuclear war with Russia but continue to extend indirect suport to Ukraine.
If not anything this conflict has helped a few Nato leaders
1 Boris Johnson whose chair was shaky, can now be sure of retaining it, hence he is making the loudest noise
2 Macron is sure to be re-elected
3 Nato secretary generals term extended by one year
4 Canadian PM will be in power full term
5 Rest of the members can be sure of their seats for some time
I was about to say this , Ukraine is not yet NATO member
that's is what you wish ... try it .
@@fishnug3405 In what world is Boris Johnson sure of retaining his seat? The British economy is a disaster, he broke his own covid rules multiple times and the Conservative Party are behind in the polls. It's also irrelevant, the opposition have said very similar things about Ukraine as Johnson.
@@freefromleftwing
Dear friend
All in lighter vain ; I sincerely wish and hope this war comes to an end without loss of face for president Putin
@@goodearth5584 you know what , this is what will happen : the aggressor will get the most humiliating loss in all of his history and will have decades of grey times ahead . You can't beat karma .
This was a very well thought out explanation of the escalation process. Because it's speculatory, but thoughtfully based on actions, level of aggression, dominance, etc, it does paint the picture of what Russia COULD do. We hope that Putin does not go down that road, because we've seen where it leads. If he loses this and Ukraine pushes them out, hopefully, he accepts defeat. If not, I fear the tactical nuke is the next step and he's simply crazy enough to use it. The global response will be overwhelming. I hope the people of Russia who don't agree with what he's doing have the courage to assemble and do what needs to be done and take back their country. As others have mentioned though, he's got several other conventional assets and means to project war before the nuclear option, but based on the theater risk, pushback, and the length of time in conflict, he could choose to escalate sooner, hence "escalate to de-escalate", to force a surrender. But then NATO tags in and the $h!t hits the fan. I'm no geopolitical scientist, but I was active duty for 21 years, and I can say this wouldn't turn out good for anyone.
Push any nuclear power into a corner and they will all act in the same way. So dont push them into that position, leave room for a way out
putin refused any diplomatic solution until now, so what should the west do?
@Daredevil you think the war will stop if NATO stops supplies? ukraine would keep fighting and maybe win, and if russia succeeds putin would invade moldova next.
@Daredevil what? putin wont stop until he conquers ukraine and possibly moldova, maybe even the baltics,.. or until russia is defeated in ukraine. Stopping supplies to ukraine wouldnt stop the war, it would actually escalate it since putin would smell weakness in the west and exploit that.
@Daredevil russia isnt invincible you know? im not saying ukeaine can conquer russia, but they can probably kick them out of ukraine with increased western support
@Daredevil he wont go for NATO because he knows his army would get destroyed easily, given the performance in ukraine, the danger is that he will then escalate to nukes to save face. this is why a direct russia NATO confrontation has to be avoided by keeping putin busy in ukraine. you seem to think that putin only wants ukraine, that is false he wants the old soviet borders back. sooner or later he has to be stopped, better now then in a NATO conflict.
I don’t think article 5 would apply in the case of Ukraine. Also,, while the use of tactical nukes would be unsavory by any standard, it is doubtful that Europe would want to risk the destruction of its glorious cities which would be very difficult to rebuild. America can also not afford to risk the destruction of major urban areas simply because Moscow chooses to defeat resistance in Ukraine by making large rubble into small rubble. Unfortunately many countries have already made choices that very well may have foretold what will be russias most practical options for its survival.
The final question will be whether or not Europe and America will decide to join Ukraine in being destroyed by nukes simply to “teach Russia a lesson” or to continue to pretend that they are the masters of the globe able to punish this or that country with sanctions or military action and themselves remain without a scratch.
Arming Ukraine in the manner that was done was not enough to either prevent or defeat an invasion. This was done in the spirit of proxy war against a geopolitical rival.
Russia must prevail against Ukraine in order to either barter down the sanctions, or have a prize (the worlds largest garden) to defray the cost of catastrophic sanctions until collateral economic mechanisms can be developed to make up for same.
So if Putin needs to use nukes, he will, and or is unlikely the west will respond in kind. Russian cities are much easier to evacuate and rebuild than American ones. Russia doesn’t have the severe social problems of America so they will cooperate with each other to rebuild, America will resemble mad max.
So while it might have seemed like a romantic notion to flood Ukraine with too little too late stingers and javelins and military intel and drones,, all this has done is increase the damage to the infrastructure, that won’t be paid by Russia.
And has obviously shown Russian forces incapable of winning this war conventionally, so their remaining choice to secure the country may well be the use of tactical nukes.
Nobody wants this to happen for many reasons. But if nato is now scared of a no fly zone because it might draw them into a nuclear war,, why would Russia using tactical nukes make them less scared of this same fate, if anything it will make them realize how truly close to this end all of us really are.
The fact is that the west is not in as much control over the world as we think and the longer we deny this fact the more danger we remain in.
You’re certifiably insane, you cant rebuild when the air boils your skin and your lungs turn to liquid.
Firstly, the west is well aware of the fact that sanctioning Russia hurts us too. We know. We're doing it anyway because it's the right thing to do, and sometimes you must suffer hardship for the sake of what is right. Our ancestors did the exact same thing during the Second World War, this is nothing compared to what they went through.
Secondly, you're overstating the social problems in America. By a long way. America is not on the brink of civil war lmao.
Thirdly, this idea that Russia has no social issues is actually hilarious. You genuinely believe the Russian propaganda? There has been mass protests across Russia. There is a tonne of Russian support for Navalny, who is in prison for opposing Putin. Russia has tonnes of social issues, they just don't show it often because they get arrested if they do. Tonnes of Russians are fleeing the country. It's economy is dying. Russia will be the worst place to live in all of Europe very soon.
Do you remember a little event called the Russian grain embargo following. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan? It killed the American family farm in the 80s. Was our suffering here in America worth it? No.
We aren’t currently aware of how severe our economic damage will be or the collateral damage to the other countries of the world causing negative recursive economic effects to America or others.
Our ancestors weren’t dealing with a national debt equal to their gdp. They also were dealing with imperial Japanese and nazi germany not the Russian federation. This is an important distinction for two reasons, 1) the conflict with Russia has the potential to spin out of control to a global thermonuclear war in a matter of hours, days or weeks, and the battle space in ww2 was far slower moving compared to modern times. 2) a victory by imperial Japan and nazi germany would be a horrific trajedy compared to a victory by the Russians over Ukraine.
Are the Russians capeable of what the Japanese and Germans were? Obviously not.
(To understate) there would be some tax law changes, a flag change, and some national pride being swallowed, but the experience of a defeated Ukraine wouldn’t be the experience of a defeated Poland or Nanking.
Another words the negative stakes for a Ukrainian loss are much lower, and the negative stakes for an escalation are much higher.
I referenced social problems that would prevent us from efficiently rebuilding our cities not civil war. (I’m not sure where you got that reference)
I never said there were no social issues in modern Russia,, I said they don’t have our “severe social problems that would hinder our rebuilding of our cities after a nuclear strike.
Perhaps you think the citizens of Chicago would evacuate better and rebuild better than the citizens of Moscow?
Perhaps you think the collective masonry and carpentry skills of New York are better than those of at.Petersburg?
Maybe you think the citizens of Los Angeles would get along better after a nuclear blast than the citizens is Saratov? Interesting.
Let’s hope we don’t get to find out.
You underestimate the desire to live without a knife at the throat of Europe.
We trusted the Russian regime once (trade, technology, oil, tech).
It won't happen again untill there is a grand, clear and visible shift in policy and demeanor.
The use of a nuclear weapon in Ukraine might not trigger a nuclear reaction at first but it will have severe and definite consequences for the current regime.
if the radiation begins to affect nato members more ane more, there is a big chance that nato is almost forced to react by joining the war.. and you know that.. it is not a simple situation.. one can not just think that "I don't think that article 5 would apply".. it is much more complex..
He won’t be cornered ever until the Russian people bang on the gates. All he has to do is just leave in shame. That’s not in corner.
God help our world. We have no Focus in making things better
I have a focus zx3
Just in case you forgot, America too has a first use policy in the case of existential threat. I'm sure that was an honest omission.
We need one of those to land on West Hollywood and west Village New York.
Every states .
@@jeffrey4181 the hell with you I hope one lands on you as a US. Marine corps veteran you don't like us that's your problem
A tactical nuke in Europe would provoke a full launch response because it would validate that NATO is the intended target. There is already no faith that it be the last use or the aggression will stop.
The fear of a nuclear fall out once Putin uses nuclear weapons be it tactical or not would surely affect surrounding NATO countries around Ukraine. And, it is enough reason for NATO to move according to Article 5, which is an attack on one member nation is an attack on all. This will definitely blur the lines between defensive and offensive use of nuclear weapon. And, mind you if and when Putin decide to use nuclear weapons, God forbids it, he know that strategically time is of the essence, before NATO can react it is advantageous to use nuclear arms to its full potential. May God save us all from this mad man.
@@gtrgtr9619 You have contributed a good explanation.
It would be the end of the world as we know it, all NATO nukes targeted at every Russian city, as the Russians and their allies would also target ours, billions of people & animals would die in that type of war.
Nah. It would provoke a war most likely, but the west wouldn't go to a full nuclear launch in response. The first to use nukes in modern combat (especially as the aggressor) would become worldwide pariahs and would die a slow economically strangled death while methods to knock their nukes out would be developed and deployed.
As poor as maintenance has been on conventional Russian military equipment, I wouldn't be surprised if the vast majority of Russia's strategic nukes were duds by now and tactical nukes aren't actually tactical to begin with. So they have no legitimate military use.
Your logic is litlle bit confuse.
Russia on january already saying, warning to america and Nato about ukraine and give them security proposal!!!
Russia attack ukraine because nato eastward expansion.
Even with bla..blaa.blaa sanctions the biden, europe,nato bark .
putin have balls to attack ukraine for russia interest.
And now russia telling west do not intervene on ukraine or nuclear go into your ass.
Lets see are NAto gangs have balls??
Because russia already saying many times there is no place to retreat.
Russia like a man if diplomacy fail choose the hard way or nuclear .
😎
I love crux, but did i hear "thats EXACTLY what putin MIGHT do"
The problem with threats to strike fear ,might scare the adversary into doing something stupid ,like striking first, when least expected like those days of infamy we remember each year..We never know what dictators might do..😱😳😱
Ukraine has no nukes.
Like a large hostage situation, but he's already killing the victims.
What I think is tactical nukes or low yield nukes will be used for targeting enemy concentration or mass formation to win a particular battlefield location. The real question is whether Putin will use them in Ukraine and what will be the NATO response.
The guy's invaded a country however he'll use nuclear weapons if he feels Russia is threatened....go figure.
I've been worried about this too, but they probably won't be needed. The test of the hypersonic missile shows that Russia can take out any target anywhere, without resorting to nukes. For example, in a war with NATO, Russia could bomb all NATO HQs, including the Pentagon, without being the first to fire a nuke. NATO might respond to that with nukes, though.
Russia has less than 10 hypersonic rockets not missles, so forget it
Don't forget about 6k+ nuclear weapon. So 10 hypersonic is your assumption. They have more than thousands hypersonic.😅
@@abrardigit no.. a nuclear warhead is not the same as a rocket which can carry a nuclear warhead.. these are different things..
@@hehno1 they have been in production at least 4 years. Where did you get this idea?
Well it's been all down hill since Covid anyways 🤷🏻♂️
Another difference in tac-nukes is, they are dial-a-yield, meaning you can control the chain reaction of the neutron flow by letting some escape before splitting further atom cores.
Also there are tac-nukes in the form of Howitzer projectiles, 155mm and 8 inch(203mm).
This is too much, if being attacked by enemy in wars using nuclear is the last resort as preventive. Russia under Putin is attacking to use not for defensive but attacking in totally different purpose for wars.
I have to say...Putin is a man with a mind of a Crusadian 😑😑😑
deus vult!
@@nolollygagging11 there is no god ,stop believing in imaginary friends
The US has always had a first use doctrine.
That was before we had weak leaders afraid to stand up to a greedy, incompetent bully and his horde of ignorant, repressive, regressive conscripts.
@@williamyoung9401 All US presidents since and including Carter have been intellectually and morally challenged. As for conscription, Russia is capable of it. It would be impossible to conscript soldiers in the US, since Vietnam. That's a fatal limitation in a major war.
The number of people killed depends as much upon the population density of the target as the strength of the bomb. Obviously a small nuke detonated in a city will kill more people than a large nuke detonated in the countryside. Therefore measuring a nuke by the death count is, of course, a tad misleading.
Remember, Putin, it's not how big. It takes only a small atom triggering other atoms.
America should release some of its weapons from Area No.51 if Russia resorts to using Nukes.
I'm confused about the issue of war crimes ...my understanding is that there's absolutely no statute of limitations therefore the United States should be held culpable for the hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths after the detonation of two atomic bombs. Is this relevant in this day and age when we accuse other foreign powers of war crimes... let's look at the big picture and stop having just an American point of view
The convention was signed after ww2.
War crimes are charged only on losers.
@@bipl8989 that is one of the most astute things I've ever heard my dad used to always say history is written by the winners so touche for your insight thank you
Do you know the word HYPOCRISY or double standard ? That's your answer.
If Japan didn't attack Pearl Harbor first - maybe there would not have been a Hiroshima and Nagasaki disaster.
Russia wants Ukraine, so think people why why would he use nick weapons.
USA did not hesitate to use bucks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki even after war was over
Oh Lord , please cancel all threats to kill .We can not all die for one man wicked mind.
Let those bombs explode in your yard, permit his mind explode as he is doing to other without compassion.
article five cant be invoked if Russia uses a nuclear weapon against Ukraine, unless any fallout that spread across NATO territory would be declared an attack, which is a stretch considering all the nuclear tests conducted by the u.s and the soviet union in the past, but allright.
Thank you for sharing your knowledge. This helps a lot to understand how they will operatw and the impacts of the Nuclear weapons.
Woa woa wia! Shut your filthy mouth we as a people of earth can not let elites tell us Nukes are a viable option!
@@nueroendoctrinecarcinomaaf2272
Grace and peace to you.
To whom do you address your message?
I think this video help us alot to understand this topic.
Ukraine is also not part of NATO. And NATO has stated that they will not fight Russia unless attacked on NATO territories.
Since Ukraine is not part of NATO, Russia could probably use nuclear weapons without worrying about a nuclear retaliation since NATO isn't obliged to defend Ukraine militarily.
This actually makes nuclear weapons a valid option for Russia. In fact the heavy sanctions and support for Ukraine might make the nuclear option even more tempting.
NATO could be indirectly provoking a nuclear strike without realizing it. It just depends how far Putin is willing to go.
There is nothing to be gained for Russia by employing nukes. There is no singular military target in the Ukraine to bomb. It’s not much more than house to house fighting.
Any use of nuclear weapons by them would have them cut off from the rest of the world like Nth Korea is. NATO would not enter into a nuclear exchange as they would not be prepared to escalate the situation beyond Ukraine. They don’t need to. Russia will be crippled if they went the nuke option.
@@matthewtighe7401 If you’re cornered with no escape, then you might as well take the rest of the world down with you.
It’s important for the peace negotiations to offer Putin a way out of the situation.
Tactical low yield ones should take all of Putin's bunker. Thanks for the info on Russia's first strike doctrine.
7 minutes the amount of time Putin has to live if he did choose such a thing the US can drop a hypotonic. Weapon on Moscow in 7 minutes flight time
Russia deploys and takes 5 minutes. Check it out buddy :D
@@Luciferuss 5 minutes to hit what the continental United States or the Ukraine ? Either way it is mutual destruction
Well educated. I love your teaching. Thank you so much
I am truly shocked how people can laugh and joke about this situation. People need to be very clear. We could all be blown to pieces & those are the lucky ones. The unlucky ones survive!
I’m not laughing and joking about this situation! But I’m trying to get and stay close to Jesus! It’s a very serious time!
Swear this is like having Admiral General Aladdin explain nuclear weapons. A tactical nuclear weapon is defined by its payload or nuclear yield it has nothing to do with distance.
In this case NATO has no other option but to respond with equal magnitude,I doubt NATO will retaliate with nukes bcos Rusiia has shown they will fire back.
Dude, Do you think Nato had any chances to fire back .
@@jeffrey4181 The question is which society will be more control by their govt ??Do you think Europeans are will to die to fire a nuke back ?or they will be stunned by Russia action n think maybe it would be best to stop it from escalating!?
@@johnwong8336 Since Ukraine ain't a Nato member why would they retaliate anyway.
Nato will definitely respond to Russia with much more of severe Nuclear attack if Putin was stupid enough to even use one Tacticle nuclear weapon. Why because Ukraine 🇺🇦 is surround by NATO countries and that radiation will hit at least one nation which activates article 5! And if USA attacks I think they will have there 20 plus ballistic Subs with 194 475 kiloton warheads each fire all at once at Putin’s Milatary and nuclear weapon weapons! And yes America will be devestatated aswell but they do have defense against ballistic missles and unknown weapons in space. The world will probally end.
@@Conan-ny1um does your country us hve hypersonic missile
You made a fallacy in your analogy. He said that they would be a response from NATO if Russia uses tactical nuclear weapons. This is false. Ukraine is not a NATO country and they don’t fall under article 5. If Russia launched a nuclear attack on Ukraine NATO would do absolutely nothing.
I said that but people are saying radiation spreading from Ukraine to Poland would be enough to respond.
@@gbjanuary Unlikely. First of all, the only city near enough to the polish border is Lviv. People way overestimate how far fallout spreads or how it spreads. Fallout depends entirely upon wind direction. Also, fallout is only spread out to a decent amount if a ground strike occurs, which in the event of a city being bombed is unlikely. And at the end of the day, a nuclear response by NATO over some radiation crossing the border wouldn’t make sense and be an overreaction. Risking the collapse of the entire western world over an uptick in cancer rates in Eastern Poland makes no sense. It would just be a tragedy we’d have to accept.
@@andrewe.8373 thanks for the info. Chernobyl incident radiation did reach the U.K. on the winds.
@@gbjanuary Chernobyl was a completely different type of event than a nuclear blast. Nuclear reactor meltdowns release far more radiation than nukes do. They also release it for days rather than a short moment. That’s why Chernobyl still is mostly uninhabitable to this day while places like Hiroshima quickly rebuilt and were home to millions of people not long after the atomic bombing. If nukes carried the similar effects as nuclear reactor meltdowns, all of those tests back in the day would’ve resulted in radiation spreading throughout large regions rather than small controlled areas designated for testing.
Using a nuke would only replace a percieved existential threat with a more certain existential threat: the nuclear response. It would also probably result in Ukraine acquiring nuclear weapons so it wouldn't be a smart move but hard to be sure with Putin.
There really is no Ukraine. Ukraine is a Pentagon sock puppet. It's Russia vs. US-led-NATO.
@@keysersmoze True bro. It’s Russia vs the US. Zelensky is basically in a US trance state is not even aware of what’s going on. 🤣
Ukraine wont acquire any nukes
Ukraine wouldn't be able to build nukes that quickly. If they got nuked, they would probably have to surrender. However, Putin would still have to deal with a lot of non-nuclear consequences as Russia would likely be cut off from the rest of the world for decades if Putin made such a decision.
Russia cannot argue that Ukraine is a existential threat to Russia's existence. That is just a poor argument.
No, not Ukraine...if NATO attacks Russia that would be an existential threat and that would be a valid argument.
Great presentation, non biased, well verse, non partisan. Professionalism at its best. Truly, i seen a real expert today.
Your monkeytoss analogy is a "uniquely singular" comparison. Made me smile. A quite Indian moment.
American gays don't understand this
West being salty for not voting against our best friend. India ain't the country who stabbed from behind.
A friend in need a friend indeed. 😂😂😂
Time forDOWNFALL OF DOLLAR HEGEMONY TO MUCH ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE DOLLAR AS A MAIN BACKBONE OF WEST AND MATO SO WETHER WEST COUNTRY WILL BE DOING OR NOT BUT YEAH EMTIRE ASIA EXPECT JAPAN & AUSTRALIA & SOUTH KOREAN OTHER REST OF THE COUNTRY IS READY TO TRADE BETWEEN COUNTRY OF ASIA WITH THEIR OWN LOCAL CURRENCY JUST TO DITCH ZIONIST DOLLAR.
THE RISE OF EAST ERA AS WE CAN SEE FUTURE OF ASIA IS BRIGHT. ✌️🤘
LONG LIVE RUSSIA AND INDIA AS LONG TIME FRIENDS. 🤘🙏👍
ALSO ITS THE BRANDON & HIS PUPPET BORIS THEY BOTH BEING SHAKY AS THEIR PLAN IS NOT ON THE RIGHT TRACK. So they pulled india onto this WAR as of since day one when war started #INDIA DID STEP BACK FOR VOTING IN UNSC AGAINST OUR FRIEND RUSSIA.
DOWNFALL OF WEST NATO & E.U
I smell bacon
And no nation, even United Nations, has any authority to forbid or to intervene such nation as Russia to do so. The reason is quite obvious: the power is inherent to the daring will to push the nuke button to destroy a land.
Despite what the media says, it could be that Russia is doing what it had planned on doing
Kiev is not important for Russia goals but by having the military so close to the capital, it serves as a distraction.
The only two or three things I believe russia wants from this is of course no nato membership for Ukraine but beyond that they want donbas and to secure water sources for Crimea. They've accomplished one of those goals and they're probably going to take the rest of donbas
I watch foreign media like Indian sources and the news just isn't the same as we see from western sources.
You have to be careful trusting Russian and Ukrainian sources. Both sides will lie or exaggerate figures. If course both sides are going to greatly exaggerate how many of the enemy they've killed and how many they've lost. And the west is included with the Ukrainian side.
Point is, good news on this topic has to be sought out of you're in the west.
I believe United State’s situation in Afghanistan should be an example for Russia 🇷🇺 to Fallow.
Not if Putin use nuclear weapon on Ukraine and rest of Europe!
Russia was defeated in Afghanistan first the US should have payed attention
If the glow comes it will come over Moscow. There is no tactical nukes war only total nuclear war . The use of so called tactical nukes over ucraine means the simultaneously use of the 80 strategic nukes from the 4 b52 bombers which are always pointing towards the main 6 Russian cities
likewise it works both way's
And the 432 sub based minuteman nukes.
Cowards are even afraid of their own shadows. They only understand two languages: brutality and power.
To date only one country in the world had displayed a willingness to use nuclear bomb - the united states.
That's because they had to introduce the power of nuclear weapons to the Japanese qnd the world so that world war 2 stops...if they didn't do that the war would have taken a lot more lives lol...do you know how many millions died in ww2? And the war stopped with a few hundred thousand of nuclear bombs...fair trade...+ America asked them to evacuate but they didn't cause they didn't believe such a weapon could exist. They didn't believe it was just 1 bomb that did that so America dropped one more...then they believed them and surrendered..Now is totally diffrent . Russia is invading a nation and threatens to use nuces for no reason because he sais "if we feel threatened " if you feel threatened then dont start a fckn war and commit war crimes I the first place
@@stfu_trash95 fair trade?they didnt believe so they had to be bombed? right! old men, women and children. probably the same with people who didnt believe. those in yugoslavia, iraq, libya, syria and the most recent afghanistan and other places whose populations didnt believe and therefore had to be bombed...
@@dannodeleon2855 of course it was fair trade . Only 200.000 died and the war came to an end lol...do you even know how many millions would have died if they didn't surrender? You can search it all you want. They were told about the nukes but Japan didn't believe that a bomb of that power exists so they didn't evacuate. Is facts.But again the war stopped so it was a huge win for humanity.
@@dannodeleon2855 learn your history or the history will be repeated they used to say in my school
@@stfu_trash95 i know history.. its your narrative i dont subscribe to. or your kind of ideology w/c history offers do not reflect the american spirit that inspired and influenced the world.
Putin " real man".
Real coward hiding in a remote bunker in Siberia.
If we don't mind our own damn business. This is bound to happen if don't leave these people alone. That fight has nothing to do with us. Biden has made this out problem and it's not
I enjoyed your video.
Allow me to point out a detail that requires correction, it is regarding this (unfortunately) ---> 7:31
Modern nuclear weapons have gone a long way since the beginning of the 21st century and the introduction of novel materials and other compounds.
Managing a nuclear let alone thermonuclear explosion while limiting its explosive energy to sub-decatonne range is a feat in its own, as well as a good indication of the level of practical understanding of the particle physics fundamentals.
As wrong as it might sound (exploding things with the purpose of killing other human beings is actually always wrong don't get me wrong) - but there is a much wider spectrum of practical use for the fission weapons of today, especially as deep ground or hard frontal defense lines penetration articles where the traditional ground/air offensive strategies would incur unacceptable loss of life or in situations where time is of critical importance for the initiating side.
***EDIT***
This was kind of perplexing ---> 8:46 ...all it needs to do is convince itself that something or someone poses an existential threat...all right...isn't that logical? I mean, because the way you presented that seems as if that's unreasonable or wrong. Should Russia instead opt for others to analyze, judge and convince its government and its people of their national security? That is surely a wet dream of the US and North Atlantic Alliance and of course that is wrong.
well that esculated quickly great way yo get everyone in to a war damn the gas scare we will use the mini nukes
Pro Russian clowns at comment sections spot onnn!!
Pro Western clowns like You at the comment section spot on
Uncle SAM joker kid go and watch super man / spider man ...
Pro Russia pro euro pro US it doesn't matter it's like sitting at the table and having different views...
Same scenario like ww2 too japan like Ukraine is not surrendering so drop 2 nukes and make them
Not Ukraine , US , UK , Canada , Australia and all Nato allies .
If nukes are used it would be hard to believe that other nations around the world would just stand by. It would escalate the war to WW3.
Interesting how no one knows if he would resort to this or not.
He won't...or more accurately, his generals won't allow him to if he tried.
ELOHIM bless u Russia and bless PVPUTIN 🌹🥰❤️ in all his military campaign🌹🌹🌹
why bless a criminal.
No purgatory for war criminals.... Straight to hell for Putin
@Neuro I wanted to say the same about you bro 😆
President of Russia Vladimir Putin can be called a mad man or a great leader so I believe he could use Nuclear if he need.
I'm a big friend of Vladimir Putin!
Long live Russia!
He needs a friend. You may be the only one. At least until he kills you. Good luck with that.
If he does go nuclear then so does nato and then the world and everyone is dead, there is no winner in a nuclear war 🙄
It took only 14 seconds for the 1st mistake in this video.
"The very first AND ONLY nuclear bomb"
I pray that tactical necular weapons will never be used by any side as it will spread to a full world wide necular war.
False, the US have used small, low yield nuclear weapons in Afghanistan and Iraq. One just only needs to Google the use. The public globally is being manipulated by being mislead to think that Russia would be the first to use tactical nukes. Many people aren't aware that the use of them have already occured.
Can you prove it? Give us links
@@BearFruit90 it's a starting point for your research. Many people want others to do the work for them, then deny the results of what they may find. Not saying you, but yes the US has already used the low yield nukes that can take out about a city block.
@@BearFruit90 the US isn't the only ones
Are you talking about depleted uranium weapons?
@@markevans7142 not specifically.
AMERICA AND NATO MAY FORCE RUSSIA TO USE SMALL BOYS OR BIG BOYS..... ☝️☝️☝️🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪💪
Good luck with tsar bomb America.
The background music sounds from an old 1960s action movie when the main character is gearing up for combat. lol
Poetic justice or irony; Europe getting nuked by nukes that they paid for.
Putin is losing the war in Ukraine. His army has been proven to be much weaker than previously thought. To even be discussing Russia using nuclear weapons proves how weak Putin really is. Don't think for a second Putins use of a nuke wouldn't result in the end of him.
Thank you for your opinion, but if the U.S. and N.A.T.O. kept their nose out of ukraine, there WAR would've been over a long time ago. Since the U.S. and N.A.T.O. don't listen and just keep coming in with MISSILES, well the U.S., N.A.T.O., and ukraine will pay a high price.
@@rogersmith8480 Putin can't handle Ukraine. He definitely can't handle the US and Nato.
@@dirtshredder8737 Thank you for your opinion and yes you are right. That being said, President Putin WILL resort to NUCLEAR WEAPONS. Just like the U.S. would if in the same situation.
@@rogersmith8480 according to Russia everything is going according to plan. So why do they need to use nukes?
Russia doesn't want to conquer Ukraine,what they want is to force Ukraine to recognise the territory from the south as part of Russia. Like they did in Finland.
So it is better for Putin to withdraw its force from Ukrain by respecting the soverginity of a nation and by seeing the dangerous consequeces that should arise from the use of nuclear wepon.
Russia will not stop the special operation. Russia is not going to use a nuclear bomb against anyone until Russia is in danger.
Ukrania and azov terrorists will use chemical weapons and blame it on russia to bring nato in this dirty humanitarian game.
Dats depend oon whether ukrain join NATO or EU
I think it's better for Ukraine to agree with Russia's simple conditions and stop this war
@@soumranjanpatro1262 It's not simple to handover parts of their territory to Russia n also how can it be simple when one dictator try to dictate how one independent sovereign nation can live n tell them whom they can make friendship with n whom they can't......Will u still able to say it's simple if ur neighbour try to involve in your family issues n tell you who can be your friends n who can't....I'm not siding anyone but from a neutral point of view Russia is totally wrong starting this war n commit war crimes I hope Putin will pay a heavy price for all the brutal crimes he commited, future generations will always remember as a ruthless dictator who invaded smaller n weaker country n started war killing thousands of innocent civilians just like Hitler , He will be study in schools just like Hitler n will always be remember as the only ruthless dictator who started war in the 21'st Century...
Don't these missiles (already used) with thermonuclear warheads count?!?
Thermobaric, not thermonuclear
I dont get it why would he use a nuclear weapon so close to his own backyard. The fallout would affect his troops on the ground and people in his own country. Tactical or not.