XPENG AEROHT Innovative Multi-Parachute Safety System
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 10. 2023
- XPENG AEROHT's innovative multi-parachute safety system, tested successfully at an ultra-low 50-meter altitude, marks a significant leap in flying car safety. 🪂🚀
#XPENGAEROHT #FlyingCar #Tech #SafetyFirst - Auta a dopravní prostředky
![[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3G9MH063Cx4/mqdefault.jpg)
This is a key technology, excellent! Would prefer to see unedited shots from start to finish: the different angles and jumps do not show the actual landing nor confirm that this landing corresponds to the earlier deployment.
Progress needs to be celebrated.
Good luck with safety from under 30m. I am thinknig air bags and crumple zones are part of the engineering options for below 30m.
very nicely edited so you dont really see how hard that landing is.. It looks like it is still going at a pretty fast speed though.
Yeah it's called last resort ballistic parachute system for a reason
Maybe do an airbag on the bottom as well to further cushion the landing.
No big deal. 5.2 meters/second is within the 5.5m/s / 18ft/s limit for emergency parachutes.
The test needs to be considered with the vehicle at its maximum speed. To see if the strings will break.
This is a controlled test and it is done as safe altitude and no movement and no wind.
Show the landing. Even if it is "fast", anyone purchasing one of these things knows it's still infinitely better than no parachutes at all.
That nose dip and rebound looked crazy rough after parachute deployment. Would have liked to see an unedited version. Better than dying I guess ..if u are seatbelted in.
OKAY WHY HAVE'NT YOU MADE A FULL DOCUMENTRY VIDEO YET THEY ARE ALL REALLY SHORT CLIPS?
The fact that they failed to show the landing, tells me that is not safe yet.
That would be great that you can send out the whole clip , special how it landing on the ground and internal situation !
Touchdown speed: 5.2 meters per second = 18.72 kilometers per hour = 11.6321 miles per hour
That is actually a little slower descent speed than a paratrooper using the old T-10 parachute at 22-24 feet per second. Not bad at all, particularly if the seats/skids/suspension have any shock absorption at all, which I am certain they do.
I’m a little suspicious of the speed they published, but overall it looked like a positive result even if the impact was at a higher speed. I guess the parachutes are designed to instantaneously deploy anytime enough motors fail so they don’t have to test it after free fall. If they could get enough of a crumple zone underneath it could cover off critical injuries below the minimum parachute deployment altitude. I also think the results would change a lot with the weight of one or two people. I don’t think I’d ever take something like this above 10 feet anyways.
Equivalent free fall height of 1.38m or 54inches or 4' 6". You'd better be reclined for that or you'll be hurting
Imagine landing on the edge of a sky scraper.
I believe it needs counter explosions at the bottom when the power shoot is ejected from the top it pushes the vehicle down.
Quando eu ganhar na Mega-Sena compra um desse.
great, so now I get to experience these things "gently" falling on my home
At least, they had thought of those 4 parachutes. I believe they will innovate with something better later. Normal helicopters have nothing like those parachutes, isnt that much better?
Any way to get a prototype for an affordable price?
This looks suspicious. Why did you cut away so much? Why not show the moment of landing? Is it that bad? There are times when it's better to not show something, than show something not fully done and ruin the first impression.
Cry
It's marketing, they only have to show the good parts. All manufacturers are perfect in their own right.
Also the vehicle is not moving forward to allow balance deployment of the parachute? Either way the hover parachute test is still good.
Very, very impressive
Eu aqui sem entender nada do assunto , me perguntando o porquê os aviões e os helicóptero lls não tem um sistema de paraquedas similar .... 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Among Chinese drone videos, I have never seen a scene with a person sitting in a seat from beginning to end.
Chân trợ lực phao hơi khi tiếp đất an toàn thực sự
I don't understand why they put out a video that went wrong! This vehicle is still not safe!
We already have such flying cars 😂 they are called helicopters!
Salam kenal 🙏🙏🙏🇮🇩
In 10 meters height there is no help from parachutes in case of an engine failure .. free fall speed ---> 10meters / second ... that crash will cause severe injuries !
The vehicle here in this video reached 50 meters height and spent almost half of the height for parachute opening and recovery.
Crashspeed had 5,2 meters / second .... which also was NOT shown ! ( cut out sequence minute 0:13 !!! )
Why stop the propellers? I don't get it. (see Autogyro)
I'm not sure you'd build up enough momentum in the props to be able to create much lift. Especially with this height and speed combo. It might also be that in a situation like this it's likely something is wrong with one of the motors, props, or motor controllers so you wouldn't be able to control one of your corners, limiting how much slowing you'd be able to achieve without tipping over.
@@hOZish7 Nope. This is not how physics works. The answer is simple though and obvious..
They had to test the worst case scenario and the forces applied to feed back into simulations. The worst case scenario would be that there are no propellers
@@Telencephelon If you have the time I would appreciate an explanation of how the physics works. I have a PhD in it so hopefully I'll understand.
@@hOZish7 Yeah. I haven't met a human, Phd or not who can outperform GPT4 in real time. Emotions like pride are part of why human performance sucks
@@Telencephelon What are you on about? This isn't about pride, I'm very willing to listen and learn. GPT4 is great sometimes, but it definitely isn't at a human expert replacing level yet. There are many examples of it making mistakes, I'd be happy to reference some if you don't believe me. And my references will be real, not some hallucinated nonsense ;)
Good safety system!
Let's see it deploy after control is lost.
Why would the parachute deployment be manual?
@@akk9196 Who said it would be manual? Catastrophic failure of some portion of the airframe is not impossible, nor outside interference of some kind. Assuming that the planform will be oriented vertically with no roll, pitch or yaw is fine for evaluation of a prototype in a test flight, but next you iterate on establishing and/or improving the performance envelope based on plausible scenarios likely to be encountered in normal operations.
You've got a problem. If only 1 rotor / motor fails, the vehicle will no longer be balanced -- there will be uncontrollable sideways (or random) motion, possibly shredding the parachute. And it may not be safe to crash-land while rotors are still spinning and there are people or cars underneath. You'd have to kill the power to all motors to prevent that, it would seem.
Rotors just stop when power is cut. Maybe all motors shut down when parachute deploys.
@@zasanafesenov8119 Yes, but there may be any number of malfunctions resulting in a fall, such as control system failure, individual motor malfunction, etc. - so one or more rotors could stop spinning or spin erratically. Is it safe to deploy the parachute then?
@@TaskSwitcherifythe deployment of the parachute should kill all engines, not a problem
15 m/s is kind of a hard impact no?
Um... it says 5.2?
@no_rubbernecking "um" smart ass.. ok 5.2 mistake made.. but still 30 mph.
@@mfzb0912 OMG, no... not even half that. 11.6 🤦🏽♂️ Who's the smart ass now
@no_rubbernecking you apparently, so.. good job? Why not go fuck with someone else today.. in person.. have a life lesson
@@no_rubbernecking Better to be a smart-ass than a dumbass! ;)
Sorry but there's NO WAY that this will be available at a consumer level anytime soon. You can't even have people drive normal cars properly but want to put a few thousand of these flying above homes and businesses?! Literally zero infrastructure.
very sad
Boring - seen it multiple times !/?
Invest in tulips 🌷
what is that ?
車の事故は毎日起きています。空飛ぶ車が普及すれば、空で事故が多発し地上の人達に被害がでます。
なぜ飛行機は毎日点検されているか？それは墜落したら大惨事になるからです。空飛ぶ車も毎日点検しますか？それは現実的ではありません。
構造物が空から降ってくるのは恐怖です