Who Cracked the Car Windshield?
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 08. 2024
- Cheryl says she sold her 1999 Isuzu to friends, but took it back when they never paid. Who cracked the windshield?
#JudgeJudy
The Original! There’s only ONE Judge Judy. Visit our website for where to watch, weekdays.
Subscribe to Judge Judy on CZcams: / @judgejudy
The defendants are ridiculous . I can already tell the type of people they are when Judge Judy asked if they made payments & the defendant said “yes we paid insurance” trying to be slick . They’re lucky that she let even let them keep it for 6 months with non-payment .
They’re trying to be slick but they don’t resize that they are too stupid to pull it off.
Hello there Calise, how are you
Word! Some people are so gross..
😢😂😮🎉😢😮😅😂😮😢😢🎉❤😮😢😅😮🎉😢😮😢😢😢😢😢😮😂❤😮😅😂❤❤❤🎉😢🎉😂😢🎉❤😅😮😢😅🎉😢😢🎉😢😢😢😢❤😢😢😢😮😢😂
Judge Judy teaches me life lessons to live by. When buying a car take complete pictures and possibly a video of the car. Thank you JJ!
Me too!
Also do that on the day you move in and out of an apartment.
@@briel7904 and if any agreements are made verbally when a psper contract is present get it in writing and signed
Also when renting!!!!!!!! Rental companies will send you a bill (sometimes by mail! which can take forever to arrive)after you've already returned the car and left because they know you can't prove it. Which is why you ALWAYS take a full slow video walking around the car and pointing out any blemishes you find
The more I watch judge judy the more I realize no matter how u know someone always put in writing and never trust anyone
Trust but verify or document with pictures, contract etc. It really protects both sides
You only hear about about the bad ones. For all we know a million more went well but when it goes sour…. here you are. Listen to jj.
@@bovinityleak2066that's probably true, but getting it in writing and teaching pictures and nothing goes wrong you waste a few minutes of time.
If you don't get those things and it goes wrong you could be out of a lot more than time.
Yep. Whenever I give my partner money I write it down and we both sign our names 😂😂😂 I used to just write a check but that’s another story.. 😂😂😂
100% My brother needed $30,600.00 middle last year. He called up asked if I could swing it. No problem! OK says he. Next thing my email dings with his promissory note, with a payment plan. That is all it takes.
I want to drive a car for free for 6 months! No car payment, no lease. That would be about $600 a WEEK at a car rental. JJ did not compensate the plaintiff for her complete loss.
I agree, they added miles + wear & tear
That would be IF she had included it in the suit.
That is why JJ asked what she was suing for and she said only the damage
No good deed goes unpunished
The defendants are so shady 😒
I'm so sick of mooches like the defendants who think everything should just be handed to them.
They should have had to pay for using the vehicle.
Here because I'm addicted 😩
OMG same. 😖😂
She should have said the car mileage is increased so she should be paid for it 😅😅
Seeing that they never paid a cent for it, that doesn't sound unreasonable!😂
Uploaded 11 minutes ago, this is a new personal best for me!
While it seems unfair that the defendants drove the car free for 6 months, the verdict is about making the victim whole. She has the car back and with the repair costs awarded to her, the car will be worth what it should be worth and the plaintiff will have the asset of $1,250, technically more than what she sold it for. Had the defendants kept the car, JJ would have awarded her the money for what she sold it for, $1,200.
It's with the assumption she can sell it for that much.
If they put a lot of mileage on it, it's worth less. Had she asked for depreciation maybe JJ would have given her a few hundred more.
Judge Judy takes no shit. Love her
I miss a 90s Isuzu. Hate that this one got damaged.
good thing she had that picture .
I don't think the defendants should've gotten to drive a car around for six months for free but it was the plaintiff's responsibility to repossess the car after the first non payment and she didn't so it might not necessarily be fair but Judge Judy was absolutely on the law when she didn't award her compensation and this is a court of law not a court of what's "fair"~ She didn't ask for it in her case anyways, just the value of the car~
Judge Judy is very beautiful and very intelligent and the best judge ever
Win & keep it moving
Don't let anyone use your car
I LOVE YOU JUDGE JUDYYYYYY
This has got to be the quickest case from Judge Judy I ever seen
Lol then look up judge judy horse case that shit was done in like less then 3 mins 😂
@@jaypeee97 Damn
Hm she should've gotten something for them driving it around for 6 months. They were running the miles up on it and lowering the value
Sadly wasn't in her complaint.
Defendants r sneaky&grifters.😒
She should've sued for the car payments🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
I have no idea why sometimes, they refused to answered JJ'S question ⁉️
Her logic: well if car dealers can repossessed a car and they still have to pay them why can't I do the same??
I don't agree with this judgment. I know JJ was trying to "make the plaintiff whole", but the truth is that making her whole means that the defendants borrowed and used the car for six months without paying anything. In cases where the sale of a car gets revoked, the buyer should pay for the time they used it as if the car had been rented. Otherwise, there's an unjust enrichment from the defendants because plaintiff fulfilled her obligation ("to deliver the goods"), and defendants gave nothing to her while still benefitting from the use of the goods.
Btw: I know that JJ probably didn't give her a judgment for the use of the car because JJ didn't want plaintiff to get an amount of money that resembled the total value of the car while still keeping the car. However, the unjust enrichment still happens.
She should have gave the defendants the car and the title and the plaintiff the money. That would have been fair.
Not how it works bud, she sold it for $1200 and got it back and now with the repairs it’s still work $1250 thus she lost nothing. If u get a car repossessed you still will not have to pay the outstanding balance. I do however think they should have paid for the alignment but judge Judy probably is thinking, it most likely was not aligned before they got it and with the age there’s a good chance it wasn’t.
You are absolutely right, i even saw another case where she gave the plaintiff money for the time the defendents used the car, as if it was rented, so i don't get why in a case where the situation is the same, the rulling is different.
@@ClaudiaSilvaTorres maybe the car was worth more in that case. I saw a case where the defendants were making payments and they did not get back their money..
@@CameronL211 When you get a car repossessed you don't have to pay the outstanding balance, but while you had the car, you paid for it; that's the whole point. Defendants in this case paid absolutely nothing. Plaintiff may not have lost any money (which is what JJ meant by "making her whole"), but the doctrine of unjust enrichment still applies. Plaintiff lost all the mileage that the defendants used and received nothing for it. If this had been a rental and not a sale, you wouldn't think that plaintiff "lost nothing". In that scenario, if defendants had paid nothing (like they did in this case), and if plaintiff had received back the car plus damages (like she did in this case), you would still think that defendants should pay for the rent while they used the car.
Not sure why JJ wouldn't award her the wheel alignment - standard service.
1:12 Its called body language. And it is shouting I am about to start lying my ass off!!
$122 for an alignment? Did they align the front and set rear toe? Cause if it was just for the front end or just front and rear toe or just front toe that’s a lot!
If you can't afford to pay a car note every month, why would you take a car with a cracked windshield? That makes no sense
" Great Thank You " 😆😅
What justice being served ? When to start with you did the wrong thing by driving a vehicle without insurance 🙄
I am not selling a car to anyone on payments. You want to make monthly payments: get a loan from a bank, credit union, and so on and so forth...
Why are all of these litigants standing at a slant?
😂😂😂😂😂 true
JJ didn’t like the looks of the plaintiff
This is what happens when one plays bank and does not have a written agreement. Sure, she has the car back but in what condition and how many additional miles. All this affects value.
After she sells the car, if there is a loss, she would be able to sue the defendants for that loss as additional damages. Since the car appears worth more than what she initially sold it for, the only way to get more money is to go and sell it and prove an actual loss from the deteriorated condition.
I disagree with JJ on this one. The plaintiff should have received money for them driving the car. They never made a single payment, and now they have the car rented for free.
Its only because it wasn't apart of her lawsuit, she didn't write down that she was suing for that otherwise Judge Judy would have dealt with it
1:03 JJ asked specifically if she was just suing for the damage and she answered yes. JJ was lenient on awarding her the windshield damage already when she has no proof. Their contract didn't specify any interests or fee about late or missed payment so P couldn't have gotten anything anyway.
JJ asked in the beginning was it for damages & she said yes so that’s pretty clear case
Ooooo. No she didn't just get smart with JJ!!! AND then she tried to say she "paid insurance" and trying to pull the wool over JJ'S eyes, that crap won't gonna happen!!! Judge Judy lied in court one time saying how she's not a genius, lol, knowing damn well she is!!!
Typically, I agree with JJ but not this time. The defendants drove a car for free for 6 months. What a deal.
The plaintiff didn’t include that in her case. Judge Judy asked her in the beginning and she said just damages. At the end Judge Judy told her it wasn’t in her claim. JJ gave her everything she asked for… broken windshield and tire. Plus she took the car back.
That’s my TV mom lol!❤
Wait a minute! A tire for $59 ?!?!?! Was this a bicycle?
Put whatever transaction you make with people in writing, folks. The defendants behaved like freeloaders using that vehicle and not paying as they said they would.
$59 for a tire? That’s gotta be the worst tire from the junkyard.
Why is it people think they can go to court and make a profit ..lol
She is whole but it doesn’t discourage the defendants from pulling the scam again on someone else
Not a good friend
$59 for a tire? where?
Dem lady is mad greedy lessons learned never let someone have your car
What???
You mean I can’t have my cake and eat it too??
She's not whole. She didn't have use of that vehicle for 6 months. No one rents a vehicle for free.
So they had a free car for 6 months? Why didnt she sue them for not making the payments on it??
Does the plaintiff have a problem that she's leaning to her right like that?
Judy getting senile ,what about the miles they put on it ,
Fix it and sell it for 1200 and that will make you whole...
Just like the tire.
😟🤦♂️
I disagree, she should get something for the car. They used it, she should at least get what you pay for leasing a car.
I get what you saying but the car is only worth 1200. It's no way the defendant should pay more than what car is worth or half the value. The Plantiff should repossessed the car back in 2 months not 6 months. That was on them. Especially they can get all the repairs fix and resell the car . Next time, the Plantiff need to do better job with contract from day 1 not 6 months later
If the party font pay anything we will take care back with in xyz days...
I like Judge Judy ,but she was wrong this time
WTH?? I would sell my husband to find a nice-looking $1,200 car hey come on what is she crying about period. People are getting STOOPIDER By the second..js
I did 🙂
The female defendant needs to get better quality false teeth.
It says 8 comments but i see none
Same! Yours was the only one that came up
sort by "newest" then the comments will show.
Sort by new, it’s now I see yours. Can’t see any replies though and not sure how to fix that lol
I have the same and replies don’t show. Are you in Canada too? I have a hunch if you are
@@prairierider7569 im from india😂
Ms. Scarlett in the library with the lead pipe.
I mean she lost value on the car by letting people use it for 6 months. The mileage goes up as well as other things. This should get reimbursed imo.