We disagree with Christopher Dunn & Ahmed Adly on the chronology of the Serapeum
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 06. 2024
- For the FULL PODCAST, visit our new channel:
Ancient Presence Podcast
• Christopher Dunn & Ahm...
In this podcast, we had the pleasure of speaking with the engineers Christopher Dunn and Ahmed Adly to discuss the controversial theory that a highly technological civilization with advanced machinery may have once existed in ancient Egypt. While we disagree with both of their views on this topic, we had a friendly and productive conversation that we hope inspires further constructive dialogue. We feel that it’s a healthy part of the scientific process to analyze controversial theories under a lens of critique and skepticism, with the intent to discover the truth. We hope you enjoy the podcast!
Support us on Patreon:
/ ancientpresence
Buy Us A Coffee ☕️
buymeacoffee.com/ancientpresence
Bitcoin Tip Jar:
bc1qr72vyek568s3c3907p0s762k9xlx4ec9xh23a0
Our contact:
AncientPresenceVideo@Gmail.com
Check out Casey’s website full of art, music & photos:
www.casey-house.com
Listen to Casey's album here:
Spotify:
open.spotify.com/artist/0nrIZ...
Bandcamp:
thelivinglibrary.bandcamp.com/
Apple Music:
/ the-living-library-ep
SoundCloud:
/ thelivinglibrary
Amazon Music:
www.amazon.com/music/player/a...
That phrase can be interpreted to mean "we don't know wherefrom these boxes came, they weren't made by any known king"
I share the same sentiment as Ancient Presence and I applaud them for this courageous effort. We need more truth seekers on the front line who are not afraid to navigate the muddy waters to bring more light. You are dealing with two conscious content creators and genuine researchers who are actually putting in the work and who seem to want to get closer to objective truth. Unfortunately, many are being mislead out there.
I had the opportunity to co-lead a tour with Christopher Dunn, using his tools inside the Serapeum and at Elephantine Island. However, after getting to know Chris and after having traveled with him, I've lost my respect and trust for his work and unfortunately him as a person. There are a lot of actors in this space. It’s been a long journey to reach this stage and I know this may upset a lot of people here, but unfortunately, he’s not someone I trust and I’m not someone to co-sign something or someone I don’t believe in. If that means less business or less CZcams subscribers for me, then so mote it be. AP - excellent work!
Thanks for the love Anyextee! Sorry to hear about the falling out between you and Chris. One would hope that you and him doing a tour together would lead to more rigorous scientific investigation, instead of a severing of a friendship. If we're really seeking "the truth," I hope we can all be friends together in the process alongside each other, even is we disagree on major aspects. Maybe it can be rectified over time?
Chris shared this podcast with us and I agree with very much of what these guys are speaking about on a philosophical level of not "othering" people as our "enemies." There's enough division in this world and as Chris said during our podcast, we gotta clean up the internet. I'd love to drop in with you some time and share about our journeys.
jermwarfare.com/conversations/comedy-and-woke-culture
Grifters be grifting.
Did Dunn scam you out of money or something?
I don't know man, I kinda see this as a trend where "hippy/new age" looking people are now doing the opposite of what would be expected and are going with the "mainstream" view
Perhaps is related to the more general trend where things that were issues for the Left 30 years ago are now considered off limits and r*c*st
Like even around 2006 the left was into 911 theories but now they aren't because they don't want to be called r*c*st
Even JfK stuff. It's all because of Trump. In 2024 if a person is into Con Theories that means they are N*z*s
So there's that whole thing where these people are scared to be associated with "white nationalists" like Hancock
Or it could be that they've always just been trend followers. 30 years ago it was cool to be a new ager and into Atlantis but now "new ager" = white nationalist
And especially since CZcams is so strict now, people can't get views with the new age stuff as easily
Edit: it's like with this video I totally got the vibe that Dunn felt misled. He looked at you guys and was like, "cool, these guys are hippies. They are on my side"
@@AncientPresence Thanks for sharing this link. I’ll check it out.
For the sake of clarity, it wasn't the tour itself or touring together that ended our relationship; we had a great time and stayed friends for several years after. I genuinely enjoyed his humor and company, and Chris even praised my tour as the best organized and most fun he'd ever experienced on a tour of Egypt. And he’s toured for decades so that was deeply meaningful for me to hear that from him. He also said touring with me was immensely valuable in his endorsement for my book. However, insights I gained during and after the tour led me to ask questions, which ultimately caused him to sever our friendship.
I have always championed the idea of coexisting with opposing opinions. I genuinely have love and respect for my mentor, John Anthony West, though I don’t agree with his conclusion on Sphinx dating. Though I made best efforts to keep an open mind, I had a hard time believing in Chris Dunn’s theory from the start. However, I could find some value from his work but ultimately I wasn’t on board with his theory even when we toured together, and he was aware of the fact I did not subscribe to it. He sees saw pits where I see boat pits. He believes the Rameses statue in the Cairo Museum with its nemes headdress is the product of someone other than the dynastic Egyptians whereas to me, it’s the accomplishment of the dynastic Egyptians. The list goes on…but we should be able to co-exist, be friends, appreciate humor and tour together. Our tour group was divided, some were hardcore techies and believed in Chris’s Lost Tech theory, whereas others were esotericists or general historians and had a hard time reconciling some of his ideas. For example, we had a boatman explain why the boat pits were far more likely to be boat pits than giant saw pits and yet we all got along great and had an incredible time. Adults should be able to disagree and maintain relationships.
However, I’ve noticed that many alternative historians and authors may pretend to adopt this philosophy, but often demonstrate the opposite by blocking or cutting ties with those who choose to oppose or challenge tbeir ideas
Chris Dunn may speak publicly about not "othering" or making "enemies," and share links to podcast with you expensing that sentiment, yet in conversation we had he criticized me for watching and supporting CZcamsrs with opposing ideas, specifically “Ancient Presence, Sacred Geometry Decoded and Science Against Myth” proclaiming them as his "enemies."
This type of inconsistency between his public and private sentiments makes it difficult for me to trust and respect him.
If Christopher Dunn genuinely aligns with the podcast, then why did he refer to the aforementioned CZcamsrs as his “enemies” and question me for taking up interest and supporting these specific CZcams channels?
This sort of inconsistency is - in part - is why I have come to not trust Chris Dunn in my experience.
“I have more respect for a man who lets me know where he stands, even if he's wrong, than the one who comes up like an angel and is nothing but a devil.” - Malcolm X
Regarding dropping in sometime and sharing our journeys - anytime. The work you two are doing resonates and I’m always happy to connect.
I’ve got a similar story as yours, didn’t host a tour but I used to go on a lot of “ancient high tech” style tours. Which actually ended up opening me up to a more academic view oddly enough. It was on these tours I started seeing the holes in what they were saying and also realized they actually knew almost nothing about the archaeology of the sites they like so much.
It was me asking some questions and pointing things out that ended my friendship with these guys. Apparently they weren’t that interested in exploring the possibilities after all, just in protecting the narrative they push.
Thanks for being open to discussion - science is never settled.
10:30 If the translation of the word "made" is incorrect then he should explain how "dedicated " fits in with the rest of the sentence. It doesn't unless something else is incorrect.
Either way, both words are supporting evidence that the Dynastic Egyptians did indeed make the Serapeum.
completely agree. Chris has fooled many with pictures of his little machinists square. I'm just saying if the word has 2 meanings, you would need to show how dedicated fits in the second sentence.
Glad you guys are back again 😊
Hi lads. I enjoyed when you guys were talking.
Thanks for tuning in, it's always nice to see your name pooping up in the comments section 😃
Heading over now! www.youtube.com/@AncientPresencePodcast This is the midweek boost I need! Thank you 😊😊
I think the dynastic inherited the stone boxes . Thats why the etchings on them is so crappy. And when they come across that box in the hall they couldnt move because they didnt make it. So they cut a new stairway. . It makes no sense to make a box with such specific care to dimentions and scoop out and buff the cracks on the outside. And make the inside so perfect and then take some crappy tool and scratch your name and your pet bulls name on it...they are resonance chambers used to catalyze reactions by way of ultrasound. Duh! The tunnells were flooded . The boxes submerged, lightning strikes the plateau and is channelled down the tunnells into the water causing vibrations to produce ultrasonic resonance in order to make efficient chemical reactions. Duh!
You funny 😄
LAHTs don't believe in chronology. They prefer weak excuses over rigorous study. Sitting at the crossroads peddling mistruths until their Alien mothership returns.
Gentlemen, Love and follow each of you. Dunn is the MAN :)
The issue i have, is you all would be better served, to consider other conundrums.
Get past what Dunn said years ago. How, Why and by Who.
The when only matters after you answer the first three questions.
I have been on this for 35+ years and i can not truthfully answer any of the four....
Keep going, Someone will get there. I'm betting on it being one of you guys.
( or Ben V.K / Pooka )
If you found an unknown superior device/ piece of equipment in the jungle. You don't need why, how and who. All you need to do is stand in awe of the device/ equipment and that's it. And as you stand in awe, and know that you have no idea how, why or who, you can begin to accept that all you know is that you don't know, and that you're inferior to the maker. That should be enough. Being in stone and construction for 20 years, I don't need the who, how and why. Honestly. I'm not tossing and turning in bed at night thinking about Egypt and Peru, I just know that there are beings and tech outside of my range. Only in my humility and understanding of the unknown, i can begin to shoot the shit about who, how and why. That's when the fun begins. Too many idiots are out there in the know on this subject.
@@Kitties-of-Doom "Honestly. I'm not tossing and turning in bed at night thinking about Egypt and Peru, I just know that there are beings and tech outside of my range" The cultic Abydos kings list and LAHT helps you relax in the sheets and dream of genie 😴😴
@@RomanCatsmun the classic comedian, that cannot perceive the advanced stonework in Peru and Egypt because of lack of experience in stonework.
@@Kitties-of-Doom We know you are a LAHT apologist. I see you have shared a reaction video "Ancient Presence ignoring Evidence of Ancient High Technology" a few months ago. I look forward to hearing your open minded and scientific approach in this piece.
What about what Dunn says today? In private messages, his statements don't match what he tells the public. When we were still friends, I questioned certain aspects of his work, and he would grow very uncomfortable, often skirting around providing answers. He wasn't happy that I could coexist with opposing opinions or that I watched videos by AP, Sacred Geometry Decoded, and Science Against Myth, referring to all these channels as his "enemies." He literally unfriended me on Facebook and cut ties over this. All I wanted was to look at the big picture and study what everyone has to say without bias. I just can’t trust that sort of inconsistency or odd behavior. I’m not here to be part of anyone’s good ol’ boys club. I’m an independent researcher interested in getting closer to objective truth and helping to raise consciousness. I’ve lost all respect for Dunn and many other alternative authors. It's a game for some of these people, and that's just super wack to me.
Isn't the number of Bulls found inside the stone boxes 0?
I know there are boxes close by made of wood that held the apis bulls.
When Mariete found the place, all of the boxes were already open except one. Which they blew up. He says the blown up one had mummified bull remains if I remember right. You can read the original archaeological notes which ancient prescence posted in English translation. They also note wooden rollers and winches, to move the boxes around. Pretty interesting read and completely different picture than what alt history guys try to portray. I’ve actually seen some of them say multiple times “if they had wooden rollers they would have talked about it”. Guess they never read the papers.
However, even if no bills were found in them in modern times, that isn’t any kind of evidence of some other use of the boxes, since there isn’t anything to suggest another use. The Egyptians say they are for bulls, with a lot of writings in detail about it all, and the place is entirely new kingdom.
Love your content. Keep up the good work guys!
Thank you so much for the support!
Though I do find Dunns work pretty much pseudoscience, I do appreciate the conversation. Well done and I'm glad to see new content!
I have heard that term all my life. What does it mean. Part science or not science ?
@@StanJan Convincing psudo science will of course have some science in it. But pseudoscience as a concept means presenting falsehood as science without using facts and logic. Presentingit as science when it's actually not. These lost high technology people are a textbook example of it.
oh look :) a pseudohuman found the comment section :)
Apis coffins were dessiccators to make beef jerky.
This WILL be amazing 🎉
Perhaps we should address the elephant in the room. Up until Darwin, worldwide ’history’ claimed God created everything, there was a fall from perfection and a promised afterlife for those with ‘good’ hearts and minds. Egypt was built on this belief system. Myths suggest the further back we go the greater the superiority of man and his abilities, and the further into the future we go the weaker we are through mutations and loss of DNA information. Darwin rejected our ancestors ‘history’ and replaced it with the theory of evolution, claiming all life came from no life and through gain of function mutations we are superior to our ancestors. We interpret the past through this mindset therefore believe the myths and belief systems of Egypt etc are unintelligent nonsense created by inferior humans. This issue should be sorted first and foremost because we interpret the evidence depending on whether we believe our ancestors myths, or Darwin’s claims. If humans were indeed once ‘gods’ compared to us then we should expect to see abilities we cannot emulate, if humans were apes then we should not see anything from the past that we could not easily create.
WELL SAID !
We all must respect Mr. Dunn for his continuing research on the ancient structures and artifacts in Egypt. These artifacts prove without a doubt that an advanced ancient civilization must have existed. A highly educated and skilled civilization that lived more than 20,000 years ago knew that their civilization would end in a couple of years due to the recurring and inescapable disaster that is caused by the ninth planet in our solar system. They knew that this disaster causes a huge tidal wave that is pulled all over our planet. At the end, after seven days, it leaves the Earth covered with a thick layer of mud. They also knew that this would happen five times before a new highly educated civilization, ours, would emerge. If they wanted to tell this next civilization about them, they needed a very strong and high building that could survive these five disasters and still be visible. The Great Pyramid did. Many other constructions were made like the boxes in the Serapeum to store seedlings to grow food as soon as possible and surviving places high in the mountains as Machu Picchu. We explain much more about planet 9, the recurring flood cycle and its timeline, the rebirth of civilizations and ancient advanced technology in the e-book: "Planet 9 = Nibiru". It shows abundant and convincing evidence both in text and many depictions. It can be read on any computer, tablet or smartphone. Search: planet 9 roest
Not research. Hypothetical opinion not based on actual evidence and gross misinterpretation of data.
What research? He's only grifting and pushing pseudo-science. He even said on camera that Coral Castle was built using levitation...this guy would say anything for money.
What are you talking about your _"other channel"_ ? WHAT "other channel"? I am subbed to *THIS* channel! Why can't I see the longer videos, this is CZcams, FFS.
{:o:O:}
CZcams doesn't promote our longer videos on this channel, it ends up hurting our algorithms when we post 2 hour videos that most people don't watch. So the "clips" help our main channel and the die hards who want the full podcast can just make one extra click to hear the whole thing.
@@AncientPresenceI have the bell on and I didn't see this upload. I actually went to your channel to check as well.
❤🎉😅
Arent the inscriptions on those boxes very crudely scratched in? Seems obvious they were done much much later in my opinion
Agreed, Very crude.
The inscriptions they discuss are very high quality. The lost tech types only show the box in niche 17. Not the other quality carvings though.
Watch our 3 part Serapeum series, we discuss all of that in detail. No mystery there, just mountains of evidence proving it was the Dynastic Egyptians and basically no evidence proving anything that would require a lost civilization.
@@AncientPresence cool cool I will
Where's the bull? Where's the hieroglyphics that aren't chicken scratch that dont match their construction?
The reuse over thousands of years of these amazing sites has made it possible to be this silly.
No people are moving tens of thousands of pounds of highly worked granite hundreds of meters below ground for a bull. Its ridiculous.
25 bulls! we gotta get 25 of them guys! only then everyone gets paid! Ridiculous. Absurd. Insane.
I wonder how far Gary lives from a medieval cathedral? Can't believe those fools built such time consuming giant stone things for no purpose!
They do when their prized bulls produce the work oxen that built Egypt. Bulls were worshipped as dieties.
Do you know what the historians fallacy is? Pretty much what you're doing.
Just because you don't see the motivation doesn't mean they didn't have any.
Also, not all of the boxes and artifacts discovered in the Serapeum have what you call "chicken scratch" on them.
I take it you didn't watch their documentary lol...
@@_MikeJon_ it's not the motivation. There is something more complex at work here. It's called the Workload, efficiency, reward ratio that is utterly skewed here with these boxes. The workload is enormous, and the workers efficiency at producing these boxes is low, with the reward ...well non functional. Same goes for the "tomb" for the gp. Human beings were always smart and never skew this ration when talking about massive construction jobs. i got a clip on it .
And this seems like clickbait. The trend now is to make videos saying Hancock or Carlson is wrong and that gets all their supporters riled up
What’s click bait about this? Seems the trend for Hancock supporters to get revved up that people address the direct claims.
Easily dismissed as click bait so you can avoid content.
My friend, Hancock and Randy Randal… ARE click bait !
@@SacredGeometryDecoded agreed. It's not the "false advertising" type clickbait.
And I understand that they gotta do what they gotta do. It's a good way to get clicks, it worked on me
Dude we gotta pay the bills, a little clicky title doesn't do any harm 🤙 We're trying to attract more views in a respectful and honest way that still helps trigger the algorithm to share our content to a wider audience. Let's be real, there are tons of people doing it way worse than us.
@@AncientPresence for sure, it's like the World of Antiquity guy. I'm sure it pains him that he gets exponentially more views if he mentions Carlson, Hancock, or UnchartedX in the title. But he's gotta make a living
But his are bad. Stuff like "Idiot Thinks a Vase Proves Aliens built the Pyramids" and he will show a pic of Ben
I find it woefully ironic that ancient presence latches on to Egyptian writing of any kind to be taken literally and solidify the dynastic period as the builders, while fully ignoring the Abydos temple walls inscriptions that date the Egyptian race to 39, 000 bc with the detailed kings list going back to the Zep Tepi period, as well as the Turin Kings list. Can't even call it a logical fallacy, it's just plain ignorance. Loved the сlip, and that you had experts on the show.
Edited
What they express matches the archaeology though. We don’t see any 39,000 year old civilization there. In fact, the pre dynastic archaeology basically has the same level of technology for over 70,000 years with a gradual build up to dynastic Egypt starting a few thousand years before. They are probably basing it on that. If writing and archaeology match, not much room for debate. If writing and archaeology don’t match, there’s room for debate but what’s actually shown in the ground counts far far more.
Really don't know what you're talking about here. Wholly confused. 70,000 years ago, we didn't have reigns of a single king into 1000s of years precise to the date of end of his reign. The predynastic period as it goes is described not just once in abydos but the second time in the turin kings list papyrus. Precisely to 36k bc and 39k to date. Writing and archeology do not match. Archeology dismisses the Abydos temple inscriptions as quite literally, non-existent or rather myth. Whats shown above ground is what counts, advanced stone manufacturing all over Egypt and Peru, that sticks and stones of the dynastic period could not achieve. Cute that you got the heart from the channel. That's all they could come up with. A heart. Milo , Casey, you got anything to say to my comment or just hearting nonsensical replies will do?
@@Kitties-of-Doom they dismiss them as myth because we have dated remains throughout that entire time and nothing showing what you would call civilization shows up. Technology in Egypt stays basically the same for 70k years. All the way up into the predynastic, where you start to see gradual changes into what later became the dynastic. This isn’t an opinion. This is what we get from the ground. 39,000 years ago we see nothing but nomadic hunter gatherers in the area.
Besides that, the stuff above ground you are talking about has been shown it can only be so old by dating organic matter or human disturbed material under it. Peru for example. They have dug underneath and found earlier settlements in structures the alternative tries to say is 10k years old. Yet what’s under them is only 1000 years old. Obviously, that doesn’t work. Baalbek is another great example of this. Besides this, people have demonstrated for decades how to work with granite with primitive methods. You can find many CZcams channels with people doing this themselves at home. There are better channels with actual production going into it. Or you can read these expirements as they were written down decades ago. There isn’t any need for high tech stuff that doesn’t exist and allegedly left zero trace anywhere.
@@Eye_of_Horus save it, been in the community for 6 years. Seen it all. There is no Egyptian civilization in 70k." technology in Egypt stays basically the same for 70k years. "-what in gods name are you talking about. 5 k for dynastic period and 30K for their actual recorded history. All your "dating" mumbo jumbo is garbage. The advanced stone manufacturing sits in stone. Don' t need dating , just engineers and stone manufacturers/
@@Kitties-of-Doom not sure where you are misunderstanding. Dynastic Egypts start is roughly 5,000 years ago yes. There was a few thousand years before this often referred to as “predynastic”. Before that, there’s over 100,000 years of evidence of hunter gatherers in the area, with their hunting implements staying basically the same for over 70k of it. 30k, 20k, even 10k years ago you only see hunter gatherers with stone projectiles. So where is the 30k year old dynasty?
I still think Dunn was surprised you guys werent on his side. Probably thought you hippies would into his stuff
He was very aware that we disagree with him. He’s seen our full Serapeum series and knew what he was getting hisself into.
To think that those inscriptions are in any way even close to the level of masonry used to create those boxes is just ignorant, if not downright dishonest
The inscription were most likely done by the priests, who were not the same people that created the boxes, that was the stone masons. The rose granite sarcophagus of Amasis has beautiful, high quality inscriptions that were definitely done by the craftsmen, as they’re clearly very professionally well made.
@@AncientPresence that's you just theorising, you don't know who made those boxes or how they got where they are, there's no soot on the ceilings so how did they light the area? Also, no remains have ever been found in any boxes so saying they were for bulls is just another theory, no tools from the period could have made the precision cuts required, yes they may have inscribed some of the carvings but to say they were responsible for the high level of stone masonry found is not logical, have you looked into the stone vases that were found in that area? Impossible for the level of technology around at the time, also the bore holes that have been found have been laser analysed and found to have been made by a tool that rotates faster than we can achieve today, you need to look into this more, and be less trusting of the current theories, as it's well known that archeologists are fiercely protective of their paradigm and hate being proved wrong, if you look into anyone that proposes alternate theories they are ridiculed and black balled by their own communities, look at Dr Robert Schock, hes a geologist that proposed water erosion around the Sphinx enclosure, which cannot be debunked, its all buult on a house of cards and more and more people are opening their minds to the possibility that current theories are wrong
@@AncientPresence my other comment was a bit long, sorry about that, I got into a rant there, but seriously check out Graham Hancock and when he tried to debate Zahi Hawass, you'll see how closed off these people are to anything that changes the narrative they have laid down for so many years, it's an absolute joke, anyway, it's all in good faith brother, hope you have a blessed day, ✌️ take care brother, ps, I wrote a long comment but it doesn't look like it got posted, let me know if you got it your end, thanks
Thanks for the positive tone in your response. I appreciate that you’re not being condescending or rude. It seems you’re genuinely interested in the subject, but from my perspective, you’ve been totally misled by the people who brought you all of that information. I know, because I was also thinking in a similar way as you a few years ago and I got the information from the same people. I’m familiar with all of the points you mentioned.
I won’t address them all, because I don’t have time. I can assure you though that our 3 part series on the Serapeum covers much of what you spoke of, so I highly recommend you to watch the full series to get some different information and a different perspective on the subject.
czcams.com/play/PLuROoe7EZ3dDuXJE6kcjc0Q9M068T5Pms.html&si=UUdz2ML6QM5BQ9Ch
It is my opinion that Chris Dunn, Yousef Awyan, UnchartedX etc. are good people that fully believe in what they’re teaching, but I think they’ve had tunnel vision and haven’t seen the evidence clearly that disproves their theories. The evidence is there very clear to see, and if we’re willing to really look at things objectively, it could perhaps change our minds and I think that these folks don’t want to change their minds. So they don’t look at the evidence in a clear manner, or they reject it or deflect it, so they can maintain their preconceived ideas.
If the Sphinx was 12,000 years old, it would’ve been eroded during the recent African Humid Period when the Nile River was much larger. Plain and simple. It cannot be that old.
The drill core you mentioned (Petrie’s Core #7) has not been analyzed with a laser, it does not have a true helical spiral and no, the theory is not that it would require a machine that spun 500x faster, but rather that it was 500x more efficient. You need to get your facts straight. Either way, it cannot be true. This video debunks that whole concept very quickly. It’s just an ancient primitive drill core. Nothing special at all.
czcams.com/video/HQi4yql7Ysg/video.htmlsi=ijS9bz6ptb61WRNR
I wish you luck on your journey. Please check out the videos I linked above. There’s a lot more to this whole story that I think you need to learn about. Much love and all the best 🙏
@@AncientPresence I will look at the links you provided, I’m glad you understood my intentions correctly, I’m only looking for truth, so I’ll check out said links and maybe we will discuss further once I’ve seen what you have provided, I’m open to being wrong, I hope you are too otherwise it wouldn’t matter what I presented, you wouldn’t consider it, so I’ll leave it there till I’ve seen your vids and get back to you, hope you have a great day and blessings to you and yours, ✌️
Just blocked any recommendations from you
So you won't reply to this comment then huh?
OMG, this Channel has proved yet again, that not all teenagers grow up and respect their elders. It's a childish thing!
Lol - so it is disrespectful to politely disagree with someone and have a friendly conversation with someone?
@@AncientPresence "Thirsty One You Are." No, i'm just saying that you obviously want to be adored?
😂😂😂
Chris and Ahmed both laughing their heads off at you both and I am doing the same exact thing. You just proved to the world just how ridiculous both of you guys are . All I got to say is Ramsey the second😂😂😂.Flint Dibllez 🤣 lmao
Might want to try reading actual research papers instead of being the sheep of the grifters.
@@BALES5000 It's worth bearing in mind that there were papers (amongst other similar analogues) that said the world was flat, or 6000 years old and these 'facts' were 'researched' as well. Research papers have represented established facts in archaeology all over the place that were wrong. They'll slyly quip in with "theories update with new evidence" all smugly. Oh indeed they do. But often they linger for decades despite an overwhelming volume of evidence to the contrary. Just look at the Americas.
@@BALES5000 It's worth bearing in mind that there were papers (amongst other similar analogues) that said the world was flat, or 6000 years old and these 'facts' were 'researched' as well. Research papers have represented established facts in archaeology all over the place that were wrong. They'll slyly quip in with "theories update with new evidence" oh indeed they do. But often they linger for decades despite an overwhelming volume of evidence to the contrary. Just look at the Americas.
Maybe that's the problem, they laughed their heads off l. ?
Are you kidding me dude are you really that much of a sheep?