COH2 Tiger Ace vs 4 T34/85 - win

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 25. 08. 2024
  • With a little help from Panzer Grenadiers and Grenadiers, Tiger Ace comes out victorious after 2 fights with the T34s. Victory at second round begins at 3:25

Komentáře • 103

  • @beherith2874
    @beherith2874 Před 7 lety +95

    The soviet player should have used one tank to ram and the ithers to circle, would have had a different outcome i believe

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 7 lety +30

      I think if the player had turned on focus fire on vehicles only I would've lost.

    • @yerr234
      @yerr234 Před 4 lety +2

      no need for ram

    • @housambarakat9279
      @housambarakat9279 Před 4 lety +2

      he didnt even mark target you lol from the start how sad

  • @KilliKonKarnage
    @KilliKonKarnage Před 7 lety +51

    Nice micro on that reverse.

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 7 lety +12

      KilliKonKarnage Taank you. No doubt was soiling my pants.

    • @KilliKonKarnage
      @KilliKonKarnage Před 7 lety +1

      ayyyyeee

  • @groadmiradonitz3762
    @groadmiradonitz3762 Před 6 lety +36

    If I were the Russian player, I'll sacrifice 1 T 34 to ram the Tiger, and make the rest flank the bloody tiger.

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 5 lety +9

      Yup. I was incredibly lucky.

    • @lukabajic9729
      @lukabajic9729 Před 5 lety +3

      There is a better tactic. Attack with T-34-85s one by one and strafe around the ace. Guaranteed kill. Also have one Guards AT to button the fucker, makes it easier

    • @mikkel066h
      @mikkel066h Před 3 lety

      @@lukabajic9729 and mark target so you put in that nice 10% increased dmg and pen.

  • @stefantheconqueror8710
    @stefantheconqueror8710 Před 4 lety +20

    Looks like its his first time playing lol

  • @nico14dk
    @nico14dk Před 6 lety +63

    Uses "Mark Target" ability when he was down to one tank
    *facepalm*

    • @MTNT05
      @MTNT05 Před 5 lety

      No priorities when obviously rushing against T.Ace thru all those structures n infantry ... Still tho with the current updates Tiger ace able win against 4 t34 with smoke tactics n etc.

  • @Bozothcow
    @Bozothcow Před 4 lety +14

    4 T-34's with terrible micro and no support... yes, tiger wins that every day.

  • @lostinthesauce6409
    @lostinthesauce6409 Před 6 lety +57

    play warthunder. you will loose 4 tigers to kill a T-34-85

    • @stephenjobsaulog8806
      @stephenjobsaulog8806 Před 5 lety

      right

    • @AurelionSass
      @AurelionSass Před 5 lety +3

      That russian bias... xDD

    • @benja7674
      @benja7674 Před 5 lety

      No

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 5 lety +3

      I play WoT and if Warthunder is anything like the russian bias Wot has... i feel your pain.

    • @xeron2780
      @xeron2780 Před 5 lety +4

      @@wy4035 No,its mostly german tank players being retarded and crying that their tiger can die from the T-34s because they wont angle it slightly and are blind without giving any attention to their surroundings

  • @diamondlapras
    @diamondlapras Před 2 lety +1

    It's been 5 years and this came up on my recommendation. Pretty cool kills

  • @leakcim
    @leakcim Před 3 lety +1

    Hi please, someone know where can i pick the soviet skin ? Thanks ! Yes need ram and go around. Wp

  • @vectorvec8116
    @vectorvec8116 Před 5 lety +7

    Poor manoeuvre. Ram the Tiger ace then it will be a piece of scrap metal.

    • @yerr234
      @yerr234 Před 4 lety

      this is not 2013 anymore, when was the last time you played?

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 3 lety

      @@yerr234 Tiger Ace doesn't even exist now. Well not with 3 stars anyway.

  • @tsqiddqd2537
    @tsqiddqd2537 Před 5 lety +7

    It was not Tiger vs. 4x T34/85, but Tiger+PzGren(with 2xPanzerschrecks) vs. 4xT34/85. That PzGrens shooted at least 3xtimes(soo 6 rockets).

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 5 lety +1

      Very true. But still with that in mind the tiger shouldve been destroyed.

    • @user-mr2pl9ow5c
      @user-mr2pl9ow5c Před 4 lety

      +1 Panzerfaust )

    • @koceyne2712
      @koceyne2712 Před 4 lety +1

      Yes but the t34/85s had two rounds on tiger. Then went to base repaired fully and came back

  • @shepherdlavellen3301
    @shepherdlavellen3301 Před 5 lety +2

    how did OKW possess a Tiger Ace in the first place?

    • @xoresgaminghub5412
      @xoresgaminghub5412 Před 5 lety

      Its wehrmacht player , you can see grenadiers of his when t34s rush the tiger , dont mind the UI

    • @shepherdlavellen3301
      @shepherdlavellen3301 Před 5 lety +1

      @@xoresgaminghub5412 check the bottom of the screen, both players were using a commander from OKW, on the top right side you can see Obersoldaten Sturmpioneer and Volksgrenadier, think they might be playing with mods

    • @go4it776
      @go4it776 Před 5 lety +1

      Its an ostheer player he flipped the switch icon so it shows his allied okw

  • @expandyourworld7500
    @expandyourworld7500 Před 10 měsíci

    Nice nice :D

  • @STFOURNARIS
    @STFOURNARIS Před 4 lety +1

    Epic

  • @elbeatsportland1
    @elbeatsportland1 Před 2 lety +1

    This could be fake too. Soviet player put all his tanks on hold fire when retreating towards the tiger (tiger was likely 1 hit based on health).

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 2 lety +1

      Nope. We were both noobs. No idea why he did that.

  • @20202020ish
    @20202020ish Před 4 lety

    Os primeiros combates dos Ferdinands foram na Batalha de Kursk, onde oitenta e nove foram utilizados. O Ferdinand foi otimizado para destruir os tanques T-34 soviéticos e também as armas 76,2 milímetros antitanque por de trás das linhas de frente, a uma distância de quase 5 Quilômetros, utilizando o seu 88 milímetros Pak43 / 2 L/71, papel em que obteve um bom desempenho. No entanto, depois do avanço através da primeira linha de resistência soviética, foi prejudicado por uma variedade de defeitos, como por exemplo a falta de visão periférica, uma torre rotativa ou mesmo uma simples metralhadora como armamento secundário; a Infantaria soviética, rapidamente reconheceu esta falha, eles podiam facilmente esconder-se em suas trincheiras até que o Ferdinand avançasse através de suas linhas, então atacavam o veículo com diversas granadas e coquetéis Molotov pelas laterais.
    Nos estágios iniciais da batalha de Kursk (quando os alemães ainda estavam na ofensiva), veículos pesados puderam ser recuperados e reparados com relativa paz durante a noite; isto permitiu que a maioria dos Ferdinands atingidos e fora de ação pudessem ser resgatados, reparados e retornados ao combate. No entanto, uma vez que a maré tinha virado contra os alemães e eles voltaram a defensiva (com menos veículos de sobra), Ferdinands funcionais com danos menores em suas lagartas ou suspensão tinham pouca esperança de resgate e as tripulações eram geralmente obrigadas a destruir o veículo para evitar que um destruidor de tanque praticamente intacto caísse nas mãos dos soviéticos.

    Na Itália, Março de 1944
    As unidades eram implantadas como uma companhia, às vezes, subdivididas em pelotões, com infantaria ou tanques acompanhando para proteger os flancos e traseira dos veículos.
    Embora as modificações Elefant melhoraram os veículos, alguns problemas nunca puderam ser completamente endereçados. Em 1944, os Elefants serviram no front italiano, mas foram bastante ineficazes, pois o seu peso de cerca de 70 toneladas não permitia que eles usem a maioria das estradas e pontes italianas. Em Kursk, a maioria das perdas Elefant não eram resultado direto de combate, mas sim por problemas mecânicos e falta de peças de reposição o que levava suas tripulações a destruir e abandonar os veículos com problemas. Uma companhia de Elefants esteve em combate em janeiro 1945 na ofensiva de Vistula-Oder na Polônia, e os últimos veículos operacionais estavam em combate em Zossen durante a batalha de Berlim.
    O Ferdinand/Elefant pode ter sido o destruidor de tanques de maior sucesso empregado durante a guerra chegando a uma taxa de 10 veículos destruídos a cada perda de um Elefant. Durante a Batalha de Kursk, o 653º batalhão pesado de destruidores de tanques (Em Alemão: Schwere Panzerjäger-Abteilung, sPzJägAbt) alegou ter destruído 320 tanques inimigos, com a perda de 13 Ferdinands. Esta relação média impressionante foi devido ao seu extremo poder de fogo e proteção, que lhe deu uma enorme vantagem quando usado no combate frente a frente ou de um papel defensivo estático. No entanto, pouca mobilidade e falta de confiabilidade mecânica diminuiu muito a sua capacidade operacional.
    O Elefant e o Nashorn ambos foram substituídos pelo Jagdpanther que utilizava uma arma similar.[4]
    Veículos SobreviventesEditar
    Apenas dois sobreviveram à guerra. Um Elefant foi capturado pelas forças soviéticas em Kursk, e está agora no Museu Kubinka nos arredores de Moscou. Outro Elefant foi capturado em Anzio pelos americanos, e agora faz parte da coleção do Museu de Material Militar do Exército dos Estados Unidos em Fort Lee, Virgínia. O veiculo em Fort Lee foi restaurado em 2007-2008

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 4 lety

      Quite an elaborate comment. Wish I could read it.

    • @guillercuastico
      @guillercuastico Před 3 lety +1

      @@wy4035 i dont speak portuguese, just spanish.
      But I believe is a copy paste from wikipedia about Elephant TD evolution throughout the ww2, technical characteristics, its first battle (Krusk), how many were build and how only 2 survived, one in Kubinka tank museum and other owned by USA.

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 3 lety

      @@guillercuastico Quite a long reply even though there's no Elefant in this video

    • @guillercuastico
      @guillercuastico Před 3 lety

      @@wy4035 yeah, i know, no Elefant AKA Ferdinand where harmed during the making of this video xD
      I just resume his answer. Great game btw!

  • @aa11ff
    @aa11ff Před 2 lety

    Is this with t34 ai or what no so inteligent

  • @LtWittmann
    @LtWittmann Před 5 lety +1

    What made you say that this is a 1 vs 4? German Infantry with Pz.Shrck are everywhere xD

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 5 lety

      The title says that. But the description is different. Apologies for the misleading title. But tbh that Tiger should've been destroyed. The title should say "Miracle Tiger lives!"

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 5 lety

      And I thought I'd share with everyone that absolute tense moment I had being someone has just recently (at the time) played against other people.

    • @LtWittmann
      @LtWittmann Před 5 lety

      @Babylonian Occultist I think the title "Epic Tank fight" or something like that would be better, but still your choice my friend, I don't want to be rule xD

  • @karolusmagnus800
    @karolusmagnus800 Před 6 lety +2

    Tiger power !

  • @pantadeusz8452
    @pantadeusz8452 Před rokem

    how did you get tiger ace as okw?

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před rokem

      It's actually Wehrmacht

    • @pantadeusz8452
      @pantadeusz8452 Před rokem

      @@wy4035 ok so just replay is bugged and shows a wrong faction

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před rokem

      @@pantadeusz8452 no. It's actually 4v4. My panel doesn't show on this replay, which would show Wehrmacht.

    • @pantadeusz8452
      @pantadeusz8452 Před rokem

      @@wy4035 Thx now it's everything clear.

  • @user-ix7xj6vw5d
    @user-ix7xj6vw5d Před 5 lety +1

    ace!

  • @spiderger2235
    @spiderger2235 Před 4 lety +1

    So many manpower, ammo, fuel and not 100 pop cap. This guy suck so hard.
    The tiger was a free kill. No other tanks, paks or airsupport. lol

  • @D.M.S.
    @D.M.S. Před 5 lety

    How can you play a tiger in MP?

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 5 lety +2

      Multiplayer? You need to get a commander that dispatches them

    • @yerr234
      @yerr234 Před 4 lety

      you dont

  • @incxbxs
    @incxbxs Před 3 lety

    if only he splitted 2-2 you would have lost at the beginning.

  • @Oskarekuwu1
    @Oskarekuwu1 Před 4 lety

    Tiger OP

  • @user-ue9xm4lc8q
    @user-ue9xm4lc8q Před 6 lety

    какой поц управляет так танками ?

  • @hamoudahamouda8619
    @hamoudahamouda8619 Před 6 lety +2

    rip t-34 ... tiger for ever

  • @tunasandwich8049
    @tunasandwich8049 Před 4 lety

    It's an okay micro. Just learn not to bunch up ur units because that's a sin. Remember, spacing is key

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 3 lety

      5 years ago - learnt so much since then. This is one of my first PvP matches. In fact its not even worth getting the Tiger anymore.

  • @Martinlegend
    @Martinlegend Před 6 lety +1

    he attacked the Tiger much too late he first fired at the infantry and then he didnt used the mass of tank to encircle the Tiger - maybe one Crash attack to damage the tiger and then the other attack - the plave awas also good for encircling - one upward (the one who have the tiger gun on him and the other down the hill and thats it...

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 6 lety +1

      Martymoar There were plenty of scenarios where he could've taken advantage. To my luck he didn't.

  • @herohero5839
    @herohero5839 Před 6 lety +2

    تايغر 2 احسن

  • @lucho4776
    @lucho4776 Před 3 lety

    jugadores nuevos y viejos con malas costumbres, usen el marcador para vehiculos, si no los cañones se le van a la infanteria y desvian del objetivo y por dios acompañen a sus tanques

  • @theerdem4698
    @theerdem4698 Před 4 lety

    Lol no prioritize vehicles

  • @christiansantillan184
    @christiansantillan184 Před 6 lety +2

    Eastern front in a nutshell

  • @cramanodos
    @cramanodos Před 3 lety

    XD

  • @user-gk3oc3zv1x
    @user-gk3oc3zv1x Před 6 lety +2

    Nood t34 hsha

  • @carlosandresherediachavez8624

    Noob Soviet with a single lost T34 can kill that tiger just ram and use Il2

  • @junou1902
    @junou1902 Před 4 lety

    OMG 1vs4 tiger win??? good

  • @kaankarakaya404
    @kaankarakaya404 Před 5 lety

    ım sorry but realy t34 / 85 not strong . very brittle . not true .

  • @HaberM87
    @HaberM87 Před 5 lety +1

    More luck then brain!

  • @henrysg4
    @henrysg4 Před 4 lety

    O

  • @Eclipsell
    @Eclipsell Před 5 lety +2

    China player is the worst player I've ever seen

  • @mms3253
    @mms3253 Před 5 lety

    4:00 Lol that moment when u have real knowledge about history of tigers and know that tigers where OP from 1km but when Sherman or t34 even not 85mm could destroy Tiger for 1 hit from short distances... Game makers are so dumb...

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 5 lety +2

      Think Men of War:Assault Squad 2 will be what youre after. This is alot less historically accurate but developers have no choice in order to make the game more balanced and competitive. In saying that Germans are still OP in this game to this date.

    • @ew4525
      @ew4525 Před 5 lety +1

      German kwk gun on tiger is pretty much the same as the gun on t34-85.
      Actually if you comapre t34 and tiger you are very wrong cuz t34 is a medium tank.
      you better compare it with IS-2(JS-2) or Kv-2

    • @Anonymous_Cake
      @Anonymous_Cake Před 4 lety +1

      t34s could penetrate the frontal armour of a tiger from a distance of 600m. I'd imagine the up-gunned 85 would have an easier time. Honestly the tiger 1 wasn't that great a tank. The armour was poorly designed in terms of sloping and the hunk of metal was prone to suspension and engine failures. Only thing it had going for it was an accurate gun and thick front armour.

  • @officer_donuts4255
    @officer_donuts4255 Před 5 lety

    #germans OP

  • @mbv88xxx
    @mbv88xxx Před 3 lety

    Bad micro from both players overall.

  • @dominikbirkus7888
    @dominikbirkus7888 Před 5 lety

    Noobs fight

    • @wy4035
      @wy4035  Před 5 lety

      Wont deny it. But was one of my first PvP games.