The Complex Fate of the FNAF Movie
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 06. 2024
- The Five Nights at Freddy's movie is something I've been waiting for since I was 13 years old, and now it's finally here. Was the movie worth the wait? Is there merit in what critics have been saying about it? Let's talk about it. This is my FNAF movie review, I hope you enjoy :D
// GET VIDEOS EARLY:
/ @minaxa
// support me:
/ minaxayt
ko-fi.com/minaxa
// socials:
linktr.ee/minaxa
// discord server:
/ discord
// timestamps:
00:00 intro
1:02 the part where i call it good
15:48 the part where i call it bad
25:33 closing thoughts
// music used (in order):
♫ UNDERTALE - Waterfall
♫ UNDERTALE - Ruins
♫ deltarune - Scarlet Forest
♫ deltarune - My Castle Town
♫ deltarune - A Town Called Hometown
♫ UNDERTALE - Another Medium
♫ UNDERTALE - It's Raining Somewhere Else
♫ UNDERTALE - Fallen Down (Reprise)
#fnaf #fivenightsatfreddys #fnafmovie #videoessay - Hry
Still can’t believe Shaggy killed all those kids.
He must’ve thought they were challenging him.
Like, I’m the man behind the slaughter, man
This movie is not going to meet everyones expectations. But in no means was it bad. It was a campy slasher made for the fans. And i loved it and cannot wait for more.
In a way it reminds me of malignant, a film I genuinely love just like I do with this
It is a bad movie, doesn't mean it is not enjoyable to watch and has no well made parts such as the set and animatronics/suits.
its funny bad
@@skelebonez1349 How does it remind you of malignant?
Its better if you never played the games and dont know/follow the lore.
The movie wasnt scary at all and it wasnt even fun imo..
That Nicolas Cage movie with animatronics"Willys Wonderland" is better. Its actually fun to watch and while its not FNAF it was inspired by it so imo its the better FNAF movie even though it isnt FNAF 😂🤷🏻♂️
Honestly the movie came off more as a Thriller than a Horror movie. I didn't ever feel scared and laughed quite a few times though I did feel a bit of tension near the climax.
The reason why it wasn't the horror is because what made FNAF scary doesn't make a good movie
Honestly that works best, FNAF usually censors the worst parts and is a more child-friendly horror setting (ironically enough) overall. PG-13 means a lot more fans get to see it.
It is Rated 12+, obviously it has not been very violent nor is it scary, but I did at least share terrifying moments when I was watching it, but that's how movies of that classification are, normally FNAF attracted it more for children, but I wish it were a little more disturbing, because there are scenes that had flaws
@@ButterflyBlossom6415 i say most of the fandom is adults so the PG-13 rating doesnt make sense to me
@@grathem9789 Well, you're probably right, because I was 9 years old when FNAF came in 2014-15 and now I'm 20, if it's for "fans" who lived in those years it could have more things but I'm just saying 🤷🏿
Me personally, i think this movie rocked, I think that it was the perfect amount of the story is original for FNaF, but you can still watch it without playing the games and knowing the lore. Also, bringing up the part where the animatronics have the dead kids inside them, Chica does look like she has stains on her suit, now this could just be her eating a lot, but it could've been a cut part of the movie where they do address the dead kid's bodies being inside the animatronic suits. That's just what I think anyways.
it is mentioned in the movie by Vanessa during the climax that he hid their bodies in the animatronics.
I'm just sad about the lack of blood/dirt
Like don't get me wrong, I don't need gore, I don't like horror films.
But having the guy stab Vanessa, looking down, seeing the knife in her body, with super clean clothes,and clean knife? Same with when the springlock springs went inside spring.
Just you know, to make it slightly better.
And we'll the animatronics looked not as dorty as in for example the VR game, especially golden Bonnie, the Black stains look weird but okay on the front, and just weird artificial on the back scenes.
And especially on the costume of a mass killer putting on his costume after years, having it basically shining yellow, spotless, and then the weird black patches that looked like someone tried to make it look dirty and used by having a few parts stenches with heat.
Imagine, having fight marks, or dirt stains or even a bit of dried blood on the Springtrap costume it would have been so much cooler/omnius/threatening/menacing.
the movie was definitely 100% made for the fans, especially seeing how in touch with the community that scott, blumhouse, and steel wool are
looking at it from an unbiased pov, (def tricky seeing as ive been a massive fangirl for nearly my whole life lmao) the movie has so many great points but a considerable amount of missteps- stuff that most other people agree with like some of the writing, some of the acting, the comedy that goes a liiittle too far for a horror movie sometimes, the fact that you’re gonna be confused as hell if you aren’t a prior fan, and so on- but most of these can be chalked up to a lower than average budget, the comedy mostly coming from playing with the animatronics (who are controlled by kids, so of course theyre gonna be doofs when they can be), and other things
objectively, i’d say this movies like,,, a 7/10? but the fnaf fanboy part of me is definitely giving it way higher than a 10/10 lmao
dunno why i wasted my time with this, buuut i was just bored sooo yeah :P
based uni pfp
@@swr.nezumi thamk yuo:)
Why do people say this?
"It was made for fans!"
Fans with no brains????
Couldn't agree more (especially with the wanting to give it over a 10/10 lol)
@@SireneKalypso uhh what’s that s’posed to mean? /genq
As far as the torture mask goes, I see what you mean but there are 2 possible solutions to your inquiry. 1. William Afton just made it as a way the animatronics could kill people when he isnt at the pizzeria. 2. Its comparable to in FNaF 1 where the animatronics stuff the night guard in a suit and the "blades" in the mask are actually just gears that are a part of the animatronic mask and its just a mechanism for making the suits retrofitted into a way to force the nightguard into the costume. Thats how i see it at least.
Same thing I was thinking
_This_ is the biggest problem with the movie. There are so many gaps in logic and plot holes. You end up having to invent a reason for why it all works every 10 minutes.
@@MaceyoshimanWell that's just being true to the source material!
@@Flameonoodle spot on brother
Alright, wild theory to go here. We don't see too much of the mask in the movie. I'm not a huge fan of the whole remnant and agony type scifi stuff in some of the books' canons, but there is a world they take it in that direction and that mask exists to torture its occupant to make their body bind with the suit. Heck, I'll even go as far as to admit I don't know the details of remnant and agony, but it could be an attempt at streamlining those things from the book into a simple "pain = bonding to the suit" as a way to justify Aftons' inevitable return and explain the animatronics just a touch beyond "ghost's body forced into costume".
One of the biggest things I've been taught in film classes is to "know your audience". This movie with the critic vs general audience reception is a hugeee example on why focusing on your audience is so important. If they had tried somehow to cater it to everyone, or god forbid the critics, rather than mostly fans i don't know if it would have done as well as it has (although of course this movie was always gonna make hella money). I'm so happy they didn't try too hard to cater towards those people.
The critics gave "the rise of Skywalker" a near perfect rating, they are already lost on me
@@THEJPIndustry that was The Last Jedi. Even the Critics didn't defend RoSW.
While it might be low hanging fruit, Cuties might be a better example.
Setting up Max having a character arc only to kill her is actually a classic horror/drama approach. Few things are as emotionally-affecting to an audience than a character who is likable and on the pathway to being a better person getting that opportunity stolen from them through the cruelty of the situation they are in. Research shows that we prefer closure and lacking it draws our attention and makes us uncomfortable. It is also meant to mirror the murders of the children, who likewise had their potential in life stolen from them because of the cruelty of Afton. It shows that, through that cruelty, they have also become cruel in the same way under his direction.
The final conclusion of the whole video - "this movie definitely having a soul" - it perfectly summarizes why it was such a joy to see it in cinema, even with all the stupid and inconsistent stuff in it. Its nothing like when you walk away from another mass-produced consumer product of a movie, when you forget it right after and don't feel anything at all - Fnaf movie was a total opposite of this. My whole movie teather was filled with applause after the end credits rolled, and that's definitely saying something in itself. Really looking forward towards future movies, I hope they won't mess them up.
the main idea of the movie being “being stuck in the past” is really fitting for the franchise, considering in most of the games you cant move
Golden freddy kid took the menacing aura of his dad in the Boys and applied it here, did a great job
17:25 The torture Freddy is most likely there to simulate how the animatronics want to stuff the night guards into a suit because they loosely mistaken them as an endo. But they had to make it scary.
I like your theory. I was under the impression that it was created and used by William to torture kids before killing them, turning one of their favorite characters into an actual nightmare.
No it a torture device to make rarment ( something like this)
It’s a stuffing device. That’s how the animatronics stuff you into a suit. It was confirmed a month ago
The rare and inexplicable opportunity to see a no views Minaxa video.
The kidnapping of Garrett didnt happen in Nebraska, nor did they go camping in Nebraska, the whole point of the poster was to have the imagery of the trees and in no part in the movie is it stated that they went to Nebraska as far as I know. Just wanted to let ya know my thoughts.
If you’re right then the movie was being very fucking misleading lmfao
I feel like there’s a lot of tree imagery other than a poster of Nebraska available.
Even if it was in Nebraska Garett's kidnapping is clearly a parallel to Charlie's death. The car color and model. The assumption that he goes on to possess the puppet based on the song and "come find me" at the end. If Garret isn't the crying child then idk what is.
@@mesaplayer9636 Garrett as the crying child/puppet would be cool and makes the most sense
Sparky the dog being in the back room of the pizzeria is pure perfection. Really shows how much the film was a passion project for the community to enjoy.
Some things that I’ve heard from the community is that the movie that these movies take heavily from the Silver Eyes trilogy. The Foxy arcade scene and the animatronics dragging Afton into a back room. A theory on Afton’s children is that Henry is the one with three kids and Afton just had the one daughter. Movie is a different story so I wouldn’t be surprised if Garret turned out to be the Puppet.
The theory about who the parents are from what I heard is Micheal is not an Afton by blood. He called William "father" in sister location which means he at least believes it's his father but the between night cutscenes of that same game bring into question if he really is the son of William with the answer being left unresolved.
Williams main goal in doing all the killing stuff was for remnant was it not? If not why were the original animatronics not met to be child capturing devices until the Funtime ones after the death of his son?
The way my theory goes is the events that changed are Micheal was adopted by the Emily family, and William figured out how to ally with the souls. This means that the fun times were never built because William could use the souls to get remnant so Elizabeth never died to baby. Instead of Micheal becoming the bully Elizabeth/Vanessa does and manages to get whatever Evan equivalent killed which is why she goes through with helping William but still manages the courage to fight him. Henry distances himself from his work which explains why Micheal didn't know about Freddys or William yet Garrett appeared to be a planned kill by William in the same way Charlie was. The death of Garett sets Micheal on a story to avenge his dead brother in the same way Evans death does in the game for the same protagonist.
I personally think that Mikes Dream Sequence III is one of the most underrated scores in this movie. It has a really peaceful atmosphere with really creepy cello/violin tones that make the scene really out of place and odd.
I don't think the information we get from it justified the amount of time spent on that subplot though. Especially because it's outright just stated by Vanessa and William towards the end of the movie.
@@cwizardYeah especially since Afton just happened to be in Nebraska at the same time to kidnap his brother.
@@onion8761 bro had a dead by daylight aura on Garrett.
For fnafs first film project, it did quite alright. I felt like it spread itself too thin for who this film is even for. It tried to be a horror film but it wasn’t very scary, it tried to be a kids film but as lacked proper writing to do that, and it tried to appeal to prior fnaf fans but the films lore was just a little too simple and clearcut, two things that are very new to the franchise. I know they are doing a 2nd film and I hope this one finds its footing
Watching this movie on a big screen while everyone in my theatre was screaming when there was a big easter egg or reference is a truly unforgettable experience. While the movie definitely wasn’t a masterpiece, it still far exceeded my expectation as a long time fan
There were many easter eggs for old fans, like 2 or 3 not only 1
I couldn’t believe how much I loved the movie after leaving the theater. Even though it had its flaws, it was just a great time (which is all it really needed to be tbh).
I feel the same way! I left the theater so happy about the movie!
As a night security guard myself (No not for a run down pizza joint with haunted animatronics) the breaking it to make Mike look back makes 0 sense. You are not responsible for the place after you leave your shift, and yes Vanessa being there watching Mike lock up should have been enough to clear his name.
I wonder... maybe it have sense in a twisted way? Going by the logic that Mike doesn't know anything about the job, and Vanessa is manipulated but William, maybe it was supposed to do... something. Like dunno "Ok, now you are driving with me to the police office" but takes him instead to the forest to kill.
Anyway, just as Vanessa can clear his name, she is also able to make it look like his fault and he wouldn't be able to defend himself
It's probably not that deep, but welp
I just found it weird how a movie based on the first games of fnaf didnt have the changing the cameras moment or closing the doors on the animatronics or anything like the game. Its just a security guard sleeping on the job and somehow surviving compared to someone playing the game
8:15
that's so funny to hear cause I felt the exact opposite - this scene was a huge detriment to the movie's horror and any tension you felt up until that moment was gone for the rest of the movie.
Same goes for the critics - I think you saying "they just went in with the wrong expectations" is just silly and was very disappointing to hear cause your previous videos always struck me with high level of analytical thinking. This movie was advertised as horror movie, no matter where you look up its first genre is horror, even the posters were spooky and said something like "can you survive five nights at freddy's", so a basic expectation of the movie to at least be little scary is completely justified. This ties up to the scene you said was "fantastic". Well it was tragic for the horror. I personally think that was the worst scene of the movie.
Bottomline is - I think this movie would benefit way more if it would just be advertised and sold as a thriller. Either that or focus more on the horror aspects, but the horror aspect of the movie completely flatlined after the fort scene. And I wish everybody would stop saying that the movie was only for the fans of the franchise, because I am one and I agree with plenty of points critics are making. You can have a good fanservice and a well crafted movie, I wish people stopped acting like one has to sacrifice the other.
I have to completely agree. Part of me feels that the repeat claim of “it’s for the fans” and “critics don’t get it” is in part either a coping mechanism or way to dismiss genuine criticism of the film. I’m a fan of the series, but I just couldn’t enjoy the (mostly second part) film
@@nyderkettlewell9794As a long time veteran fnaf fan i was HUDGEY disappointed with the movie even if it was supposedly made for fans.
For one the movie's pacing is boring and time wasting we spend to much time with mike dealing with his brother's abduction for the first hour to the point where you just dont care, then when he lands a job at the pizzeria he meets with Vanessa who serves no purpose apart from explaining what is going on and what is the premise for the audience, then we see mike having dreams with ghost children again and again eventually saying that if mike wants garret back they will need Abby FOR WHAT REASON i dont know and mike AGREES WITH IT!? initially like thats out of character for someone who loved his sister. Then there is this aunt and lawyer plot to get mike fired by breaking into the pizzeria which doesn't do anything since the burglars are all killed and leads to a predictable jumpscare so nothing come out of that plotline then the animatronics try to stuff abby into a suit but then Mike tases chica and the others meaning he had a taser all this time!? Then after tasing the other animatronics they have a ....... slumber party? I thought this was a horror film but f**k it. Then its revealed at the end that william killed the children which comes out of nowhere and is not fully developed even, and that Vanessa is his child and then she is stabbed (but survives somehow) then the animatroinics encircle William as he gets springlocked the Corny dialogue comes in with "i created you" and "i always come back" as he dies and the end.
The plot is a piece of garbage all for fan references and easter eggs which makes sense since this was made for the fans but i feel like this is a poor decision because its labelled as a horror film meaning that many horror fans and the general audiences are going to expect a horror experience only to find more of a horror film made for kids and fans than a actual horror film. And that will effect the sequel since critics and other people will be less likely to see it after the first film which could've been avoided if they had tried to appeal to a much wider audience. And that fact people defend this film saying "its for the fans" is a bullshit one because its a excuse for the poor writing since they know fans will defend it as long that there is fan references or that they are die-hard fans and will defend it regardless cause the franchise has a HUDGE fanbase and that its not fair for newcomers or people outside the fandom, are they not allowed to watch or get a experience out of the movie? And financially its a poor decision like why only appeal to a small demographic of fans when there is a whole other demographics like horror fans, movie people, newcomers and the general audience and earn more at the box office because since people outside the fandom are likely to not go and pay to see the sequel along with the poor reception from critics the small demographic of fans might not work out in the long run.
The RATING- there is very little gore and tension in the movie, while the games are pg-13 with implied horror the lore is not and that could've been utilised to build up the tension and horror that would made the audience care about these characters but instead it goes for a campy, thriller comedy appealing to children than adults and making the actual horror not there, this had potential if it was Rated R and that would've given the team more creative freedom but even then if it is PG-13 instead of trying to work around that rating and getting away with gore and other crazy scenes they use it as a crutch not a work-around
The characters are underdeveloped and overplayed, Matthew Lillard was perfect as william afton but he doesnt appear for about 80% of the movie and we dont get a reason why he does the things he does or why he has a daughter or why he abducted mike's brother specifically, Vanessa gets barely anything at all apart at the end when she is williams father which comes out of nowhere and only used to explain whats going on and Mike conflict of his brother and his dreams are ok at first but get boring as its the same sequence over and over as he so called 'character arc' is him sleeping throughout most of the runtime .
I know it appears like i hate the movie but what i will say is that the sets and animatronics look amazing, it really does capture the feeling of FNAF 1 even if the writing was awful, the acting was pretty solid especially from Josh And Mathew and the references and CZcamsr cameos are of course good. but overall i feel immensely disappointed because this had potential to be great but instead we got this (still gonna watch the sequel) 4.5/10
Edit: i have only watched the movie once yesterday so my recollection of the plot might not be 100% accurate but i stand by what i said but its just my opinion and the events in my plot summary are out of order and its all over the place but i say its 95% accurate still but out of order
@@grathem9789okay few things, did not read the whole thing because I'm too lazy but, the part where you mentioned that Mike had a taser the entire time because he tased chica to save abby is completely false, the scene RIGHT BEFORE, is the scene where Vanessa tells Mike that the animatronic's circuits get messed up by electricity, and the easiest way to do that is a taser, of which she gives Mike multiple, seeing as they are in a Police restock area bunker thingy, makes sense as to why they would be there. (also side note, this makes complete sense, if any circuit is introduced to large amounts of electricity that shouldn't be in the circuit, problems shall arise) Another point, the fort scene happens before Mike lets them have Abby and the whole tasing, the fort scene is there to show that while they are robots that can kill with relative ease, the souls, they are still kids at heart, they don't know any better, they just want to play sometimes. Next point, when Mike agrees to give up Abby, he is in the worst state shown in the movie, he isn't in the right state of mind, and it's just a single moment of weakness before he realises his mistake, and what he truly desires isn't getting Garret back, it's Abby, and these type of moments are there to lead into the climax, but also to show that Mike isn't perfect, if you were in that situation, being told you could have exactly what you always wanted, at the price of what you have, you would very likely falter just as Mike did. One final point to wrap things up, at the end where it is revealed that William killed the children, and that William was Steve Raglan, the whole thing coming out of nowhere, one, that's called a plot twist and is quite common, and two, it is foreshadowed right at the very start, on the Steve's desk, there is a set of car keys, these keys have a charm on them, that charm is of a rabbit's foot. Then the part about the corny dialogue, William is a narcissistic serial killer, the whole point is that he believes everyone beneath him, and technically, yes, he did create them.
Aside from all that which isn't entirely correct, of course, you are entitled to your own opinion, and I'm not here to change that, you can believe whatever you want, nobody is going to stop you. (P.S. Vanessa was stabbed in the stomach, she also mentions that she is a trained medical expert (smth like that) so she would likely know to put pressure on the wound while she is conscious, and surviving being stabbed in the stomach isn't that far fetched, it's not that rare)
@@blu8009 Ok look I literally said in my original comment that my memory of the movie is faulty and have only seen it once, second I knew you were going to mention the same defense for the fort scene so let me explain
The fort scene defense is "Oh there just kids" well one I bet it was filmed to appeal to the younger audience, second it sorta kills any tension in any spookiness in the film from that point on, third aren't they supposed to be venegful spirits hunting their killer because its disrespectful to the source material because it implies that they can rationally think which they don't in fnaf 1 and is confirmed in UCN in "others like animals" meaning that they don't think so why listen to Abby and play with a security guard and about the Mike stuff it's hard to feel that he is in the worst state of mind when he just sleeps throughout most of the runtime and another thing the movie doesn't mention was why do the animatronics kill because they don't kill a guard or a child initially but they kill burglars and eventually want to kill Abby for some reason so they kill people for fun? Idk and the William thing, plot twists have to atleast be hinted at so we can get a idea about what is going to happen but the key chain is barely noticeable so it doesn't count and as for the corny dialogue it's not about Williams social complex superiority or anything it's just corny like " I always come back" makes no sense in the context of that scene and while yes he created them why say it outloud to be corny? I'm assuming you like the film and that's ok feel free to like whatever you like but Foundation comes before decoration and the best way I can sum up the movie is
Foundation Weak, Decoration Amazing
(Oh and Vanessa was stabbed and was bleeding out heavily after a few minutes she would've been dead so yeah)
Was advertised as a horror film, and in the adverts before the movie started, they showed other horror films and even a 18+ adult sex show series ad. Me and my bf went in expecting a horror film, surprised to see kids as young as 10 in there. The fort scene kinda ruined the, "oh.. so.. it's not a scary film." I get that they're kid's souls, but no where in any of the games do i see them playing with a girl and making a fort or being overly friendly without killing.
Maybe in the future they'd make it a proper HORROR
to be fair William Afton does not appear outside the minigames, the first time we actually meet him face to face is in fnaf 3 when he is already a walking corpse, I think he will be more relevant when he rises again but this time he is springtrap
“Was it worth the wait”
Absolutely not. I was literally in elementary school when I found FNAF, I’m in my freshman year of college. That should give you a timespan.
But does that mean it was a bad movie? Absolutely not, I loved the movie!
The FNAF movie illustrates to me that good ideas are nothing without good execution. The ending scene was really what stuck with me, as, the scene before Afton’s death was incredibly anticlimactic, considering his significance in the wider story of FNAF. That picture was the only thing in the movie that I was genuinely mad about. However, as discourse around the film became louder, I listened, and I finally learned the significance of that scene. It was apparently foreshadowed by Abby’s caretaker when she said that “pictures are how kids communicate”, and that’s why it happened the way it did, but I can’t help but think that this scene could’ve been done a lot better. The groundwork was there but they failed to build off of it. The scene is so abrupt with very little discussion between Mike and Abby beforehand, so when you see it in the cinema for the first time, it feels bullshit. Like “wow, THAT’S how Afton goes out?”
Even if it was done better, though, I think the concept itself is just inherently cheesy, which isn’t a bad thing! We’ve seen cheesy concepts be used effectively before. Like the power of determination and friendship in Undertale.
There’s just a lot of missed potential in my opinion.
Even as a fan I wasn’t happy with this movie, I of course loved seeing all the animatronics, and all the fan-service, but the issues it has a movie still heavily hindered my enjoyment.
As a long time veteran fnaf fan i was HUDGEY disappointed with the movie even if it was supposedly made for fans.
For one the movie's pacing is boring and time wasting we spend to much time with mike dealing with his brother's abduction for the first hour to the point where you just dont care, then when he lands a job at the pizzeria he meets with Vanessa who serves no purpose apart from explaining what is going on and what is the premise for the audience, then we see mike having dreams with ghost children again and again eventually saying that if mike wants garret back they will need Abby FOR WHAT REASON i dont know and mike AGREES WITH IT!? initially like thats out of character for someone who loved his sister. Then there is this aunt and lawyer plot to get mike fired by breaking into the pizzeria which doesn't do anything since the burglars are all killed and leads to a predictable jumpscare so nothing come out of that plotline then the animatronics try to stuff abby into a suit but then Mike tases chica and the others meaning he had a taser all this time!? Then after tasing the other animatronics they have a ....... slumber party? I thought this was a horror film but f**k it. Then its revealed at the end that william killed the children which comes out of nowhere and is not fully developed even, and that Vanessa is his child and then she is stabbed (but survives somehow) then the animatroinics encircle William as he gets springlocked the Corny dialogue comes in with "i created you" and "i always come back" as he dies and the end.
The plot is a piece of garbage all for fan references and easter eggs which makes sense since this was made for the fans but i feel like this is a poor decision because its labelled as a horror film meaning that many horror fans and the general audiences are going to expect a horror experience only to find more of a horror film made for kids and fans than a actual horror film. And that will effect the sequel since critics and other people will be less likely to see it after the first film which could've been avoided if they had tried to appeal to a much wider audience. And that fact people defend this film saying "its for the fans" is a bullshit one because its a excuse for the poor writing since they know fans will defend it as long that there is fan references or that they are die-hard fans and will defend it regardless cause the franchise has a HUDGE fanbase and that its not fair for newcomers or people outside the fandom, are they not allowed to watch or get a experience out of the movie? And financially its a poor decision like why only appeal to a small demographic of fans when there is a whole other demographics like horror fans, movie people, newcomers and the general audience and earn more at the box office because since people outside the fandom are likely to not go and pay to see the sequel along with the poor reception from critics the small demographic of fans might not work out in the long run.
The RATING- there is very little gore and tension in the movie, while the games are pg-13 with implied horror the lore is not and that could've been utilised to build up the tension and horror that would made the audience care about these characters but instead it goes for a campy, thriller comedy appealing to children than adults and making the actual horror not there, this had potential if it was Rated R and that would've given the team more creative freedom but even then if it is PG-13 instead of trying to work around that rating and getting away with gore and other crazy scenes they use it as a crutch not a work-around
The characters are underdeveloped and overplayed, Matthew Lillard was perfect as william afton but he doesnt appear for about 80% of the movie and we dont get a reason why he does the things he does or why he has a daughter or why he abducted mike's brother specifically, Vanessa gets barely anything at all apart at the end when she is williams father which comes out of nowhere and only used to explain whats going on and Mike conflict of his brother and his dreams are ok at first but get boring as its the same sequence over and over as he so called 'character arc' is him sleeping throughout most of the runtime .
I know it appears like i hate the movie but what i will say is that the sets and animatronics look amazing, it really does capture the feeling of FNAF 1 even if the writing was awful, the acting was pretty solid especially from Josh And Mathew and the references and CZcamsr cameos are of course good. but overall i feel immensely disappointed because this had potential to be great but instead we got this (still gonna watch the sequel) 4.5/10
Edit: i have only watched the movie once yesterday so my recollection of the plot might not be 100% accurate but i stand by what i said but its just my opinion and the events in my plot summary are out of order and its all over the place but i say its 95% accurate still but out of order
@@grathem9789 I watched it twice and everything you said is exactly what I mean
@@Boi853_ finally someone who isn't biased
I honestly think the story, characters, props, sets, etc. are all fantastic. But this movie really just suffers from major tonal inconsistencies.
I feel like all of the issues could have just been fixed with another edit, shuffling around the reveals and focusing a lot more on building tension and building up the unpredictability and uncanniness of the animatronics.
personally the plot didnt feel interesting at all, the movie really felt carried by its visuals and its "oh its the thing from the game!" moments that you can discuss with your friends which did make the overall experience fun. makes sense why critics are harsher on it because you can't expect the average viewer to walk in with expectations from the games, so they're judging it on how it stands as a standalone movie (regardless of whether or not the movie is a love letter to the fans).
100% agreed
Even then, when you are judging a piece of writing in any basic English class, you are taught to think "who is this for?" and "what is its purpose?" These critics failed to ask themselves these very basic questions.
I think Vanessas character has alot of potential! I'd love to see her get fleshed out more in the sequel, specifically in flashbacks
I LOVE the analysis bit in this video about the themes in the story. Too many people said 'this movie isnt about anything' and I was like. It's very clearly about moving past loss and living in the present? I felt like i was going crazy. It's not a perfect movie but it seems like a fairly obvious theme detractors of the movie never noticed.
For the theory at 16:52 here is how I understood that: I think they were just camping, and that Michael was using the easiest, simplest thing because he was already so broke. The trees were the important part, not the fact that they are trees in Michigan
I feel like some of these negatives could be addressed in a future movie
I really hope so, that's what I'm praying for!
Max's actress keeps posting things on her instagram that basically confirm shes going to be coming back as Shadow Freddy. Theyre definitely going to revisit her seemingly abrupt character arc
I feel like there is more to Afton's relationship with the Schmidt family, why would he be in Nebraska just to take Garrett? Just how it's sitting in my mind.
18:59 when they are at the police supply outpost, mike asks vanessa if she new about what happened to jeff and his crew and she said she knew about that so yes, their deaths were mentioned
I personally think that the vacation wasn't in Nebraska but the picture on the poster is what reminded him of it. Especially because pine woods are everywhere in the US.
To be fair, critics critique movies on their own merit. And if you make a movie for enfranchised people, you will not catch disenfranchised people, it's that easy. The Mario movie was literally 80% references and not much substance for example. Fans adore it because of it, and critics don't care for it. And in my opinion, if you make a movie to target enfranchised people, you miss out on a broader audience. If you try to cater to a niche, you will stay in that niche, and lose on money which in turn might shut the doors for sequels.
And to be honest...It's a kids movie...which I don't get, because most of the enfranchised people watching the flick...are grown-ups now.
exactly
I have a hard time when people call this a Kids movie. Sure it's got light hearted elements, but putting it in the same league as Mario or Disney movies is just wrong imo (if that's what you mean by "kids movie"). especially with the underlying material in its backstory and some scenes.
This movie is definitely making bucks at the Box Office, it's clear that the Movie was gonna do well regardless, and sequels have already began to swing in motion
“Kids movie”
Uhuh…
let’s forget the moment freddy ate a guy in half and when william afton got spring locked or when it’s implied a guy lost his face
Tbh, the Mario movie was equally as awful when it comes to storytelling.
I enjoyed both, but that's only because I'm a fan and enjoyed seeing these franchises on the big screen, bit I won't tell anyone they're wrong for thinking thses movies are utter garbage.
@@moistisprobdead Max got the most brutal death for no reason at all 💀
I've been following this franchise since the start and this movie killed my entire love for it. The idea that Scott has learned so little from his own games and what made them effective floored me, and for me the beginning of the end was at the very fort-building scene that you loved so much. In FNAF, the animatronics are creepy, and they're so haunted by their past that they hunt you down - indiscriminately. The choice to humanise them to such an extreme degree that they'd willingly be the friends of the protagonists and behave like that feels like such a betrayal of everything I loved about the original games. I have no idea whether the fans who are actually enjoying this movie jumped in so late to the franchise that they don't even remember a time that it was supposed to be creepy or were watching a different one altogether - if Scott can't even understand the basic appeal that made his first game so successful there's no hope. A truly abysmal experience that has well and truly told me that this franchise isn't for me any more - if Security Breach wasn't to be my first offramp.
It's not that scott didn't learn or understood from his own games the animatronics are possessed by the spirit's of children people always portrayed the animatronics as soulless killing machines they always kill people for no reason in fnaf 1 & 2 they try to kill to kill you because they mistaken you for William Afton in the movie in the fort scene they actually like that because they are possessed by the ghosts of children they want to have fun they don't want to kill this is probably the first time they have seen a child in years they were building that fort with Abby because they needed that kick in their lives or i guess afterlives or on the other hand it could be because they wanted a fun scene with a 90's vibe you can tell by the music but I feel like this scene is talked to death it's in the middle of the movie and its just a couple scenes and the animatronics are back to being there usual selves I get that you don't like it but to bring scott into this is just unacceptable it's not scott never learned from his own games it's what i just said so just remember the history of fnaf and what scott had to go through bye :/
@@Buffalo872 Scott's a fully grown adult (unlike you), and he's a multi-millionaire who made one of the largest media franchises in the last few decades, forged significantly from the criticism he got from past entries - I'm sure he can take the opinion and it won't hurt him that bad to hear what I think. I think it was sensible to build on the children's souls and develop them somewhat but if you make a FNAF movie without the thing that actually made the original game scary - at any point - you lost my attention. It's as simple as that
@@howiieb okay so you do now the history of fnaf and I like to think that scott has a decent amount of money but I don't know why you seem so cynical but you cool here all of a sudden but ok just a little strange but anyways I love fnaf
With 99% of my whole heart but this the first time I encountered a ex fnaf fan but I'm still a fnaf and I think it's a great video game series and franchise bye :)
@@howiieb well, it was said in the games animatronics are cool with kids, haha
As you know the story of FNAF, then you should also know that Scott isn't a horror-mastermind, just a storyteller. And, also, that no FNAF game is really the same, and let's be real, it was becoming less scary over the years.
If you like the horror aspect, good for you, still got the first game to play. But the community is larger now, and many don't really care for the gameplay, just watching theories of others what the heck is going on in the story, so like... everyone will get their own opinion, expecting movie to be FNAF 1 gameplay or story explained sounds childish, but if someone like the movie is their own valid opionion
19:12 though briefly, they are mentioned when Mike and Vanessa are talking in that garage place towards the end during all the big revelations. I don’t know the exact dialogue but Mike mentions Max and her brother as being innocent and Vanessa replies that they were not innocent. Being she knew about them and 100% covered it up, even as far as to knowing who they are as people calling them “not innocent” and deserving of their deaths. They then go back to talking about Abby so I guess it was this movies way of closing that up with the bandits without spending too much unneeded time talking about them. I think the aftermath of their deaths were handled well and in retrospect were catalysts for all the events after the break in and not just shoehorned in.
There's various theories saying that Mike's dad is Henry Emily. It makes sense that Afton would be in Nebraska and would go after Garrett..
Oh wow! I remember watching your oldest videos still up on the channel right when you released them. Then I took a break from fnaf, and today this got recomended to me after watching the movie. I've got a lot of catching up with fnaf to do.
19:21 hey, just wanted to let you know that it’s been implied she’ll be shadow Freddy. The top half of her body was stuffed into a purple animatronic and there’s a tweet or something from her actor where she references a shadow In relation to her death in the movie. I think the character arc was set up for a reason and remember, a sequel is only natural(given it’s grossed well over 140 million dollars in the box office,) so remember that Scott is a pesky little storyteller so just give it time and the vague plot points will _hopefully_ be elaborated on.
Other than that great video man! We’re all in this together and your opinions are valid just like the rest of ours. This will only do more good than bad for Scott and Co. to go ahead and improve the screenplays moving forward :)
I subscribed, this was top notch quality content ^^
I really enjoyed this movie it was scary at the points it needed to be imo. It’s not perfect, but it’s far from being mediocre or bad. It’s still great to finally see an indie title make it to the high standard that is the cinema
I have a personal theory about the weird saw-blade Freddy mask. I think its a vision of a remnant extractor. this is before William Afton figures out that remnant in the key to the possession of the animatronics, all he knows is that when someone either has strong emotions or is put in the suits before death, their spirit possesses it. it's designed to illicit extreme fear thus when the subject dies, they die with extreme emotional trauma and then William stuffs them in a spare suit in an attempt to get it possessed.
absolutely loved the movie, super fun to watch and activated all my dopamine receptors.
Matpat had a pretty good theory based on all the confusing plotpoints you pointed out towards the end of the video. I thought it made some sense. Great video by the way!
when we finished watching the movie I cried, it was an absolute experience.
only in ohio ✈✈👉👉🏨🏨💥💥
Shut up Luce
Yo Luce what happened, u haven't been on discord in a while stinky
Me, Zpot, and Sprout miss u
@@TerraCoreYT I’ve been out celebrating ma birthday. I’m out till Sunday :P
I think the biggest problem was not the movie itself, but rather the marketing of the film. With the trailers and the Halloween release date it led people to believe they were in for a slasher movie, and what they got instead was almost more of a psychological thriller. For casual moviegoers who just picked something to see on Halloween without researching it much, it was probably a bit of a disappointment.
I remember being on the tail end of 8th grade when I found out about the first game. It's hard to believe that was nearly 10 years ago. I'd made a few passing friends through the fandom during my time in high school.
I think that we as fans didn't feel any suspense because we basically know what will generally happen in the movie. i went with my grilfriend, wich knows virtually nothing about fnaf lore and she found it a movie with a ton of suspense (this surprised me because I was in the edge of my seat for like 15s)
This was probably the best fnaf movie review I've seen yet. Not too biased as a fan to brush over the plot holes that I was also curious about, and ask the questions that needed to be asked, particularly how the thugs entering during the DAY was Mike's fault, why that fault is completely unadressed? (Maybe Vanessa covered it up the same way she covered up William's murders there. I also noted that she only said to Mike that the place was broken into, not that there were several dead thugs there. She probably had to hide them herself) And of course the thing with Aunt Jane, that was really odd how it is never addressed in the end, regardless whether golden freddy killed her or just knocked her out
One of the rare few videos that actually spoke how I literally felt about the movie, really excited for fnaf 2 movie
i found u from the lost art of fnaf teasers and ur content is js so cool, i love it, keep up the good work, u earned urself another sub!!!!
Thank you for bringing up how great golden freddy kid's acting was. That boy has such a menacing and dangerous energy
my only complaint is that Markimoo wasn't in it, but it couldn't be helped.
I've heard that he declined being in it because he had a shott for his iron lung movie, but take that with a grain of salt as i haven't confirmed this
@@bbdoescubing2141yeah, he said in a stream that he really wanted to play his role but it got into scheduling conflict with the iron king so he couldn’t make it
considering there’s a sequel on the way tho, there’s still a chance for the pink ‘stached king to show up at some later date :)
He’s making a better horror moive
true lol@@user-eb1xy6cl9m
I absolutely have no explanation to this torture Freddy mask thing. other than it being the "boo horror" element that many wanted...
I played fnaf when it was just a demo… 7th grade in 2014, all us guys in computer science gathered around my computer and we were blown away. I never thought I’d see a movie. I was pleasantly surprised
this video feels weirdly sentimental
the music choices especially give it that feeling. great review
i absolutely loved, love love loved, the scene were they build a fort with the animatronics.
it's like a childs dream and it got me all giddy
Imo it was one of the lamest parts of the movie and completely destroyed any potential 'horror' the film could have built up to. I mean, even the game's don't have such silliness.
But I guess the point of the movie was to cater to young teens who will be more inclined tbeg their parents for all the new merchandise because "Freddy and pals are actually your pals".
@@N.i.E.M.O "even the games don't have such silliness" bro missed every single gag in Sister Location and Pizzeria Simulator fr like... does exotic butters mean nothing to you
@N.i.E.M.O Oh not to mention the whole vampire soap opera TV series. The lawsuits you can get in Pizzeria Simulator. The ball pit minigame where Helpy comically makes a bone-cracking sound when he misses the pit. Come on man. One of FNAF's greatest qualities is the humor
@@danklebloob2149
I didn't say that the original series didn't have humor. But there was never a point where the animatronics *who you are supposed to be afraid of* decide to just kick it back and build a block fort with you and play karaoke - which inadvertently destroys any tension or fear.
@@danklebloob2149None of those gags ruin the tension and the scare factor of the antagonist and animatronics. We dont go play TAG with the animatronics out of nowhere in the first game do we?. No because that wouldnt make them scary anymore. This movie was way too targeted towards kids
People have been theorizing that Mike's father is actually Henry, as he looks similar to the person working on the endoskeleton in the training video, which explains why William might go to Nebraska specifically for Garret. Garret might also even be the puppet's(or charlie) movie version.
Great video, you pretty much summerised my entire feelings towards the film. I loved it but also have to critise the script.
One thing I do want to say is that I feel like Garrett being kidnapped in Nebraska and not where the film takes place (Minnesota) is definitely leading to more events that could be revealed in the 2nd film. One theory I've read and feel has merit is: Garrett was a targetted kill with Afton having history with the Schmidt family. Maybe Mike isn't actually a Schmidt, and William wanting revenge after the family get custody of him. Then after Wlliam kills Garrett, he realises he enjoys murder and finds himself luring more kids. But anyway if there is a 2nd film I would love to find out more about Garrett as I feel its strange that although a victim of Afton, he isn't haunting anything (though this could be just because he was killed without any animatronics around.)
Again, well done with the video. I will be showing this to my friends once they have finally seen it.
My main complaint is how Afton was shown in the trailer. If his suit wasn't in it I would have had an actual jaw drop when he showed up I also agree with the pacing but I was more bothered in the moment about how he was already revealed
I am someone that lives in Nebraska. When I watched the movie opening night, my theater lit up at the first mention/sight of Nebraska! That was something none of us were expecting, but gave us all a small sense of "pride".
I think a couple of things could have been patched simply by setting the movie in a small town, since Vanessa is a cop, i think she is behind covering up murders. And a smaller town would help with covering up dissapearances.
Coming out of the theater i enjoyed the film. Now i could definitely see alot of flaws when it came to the execution, but i was having a blast despite how jarring some things were.
I think perhaps my favorite part of the film was seeing the golden freddy outfit not just move, but interacting with things outside the pizza plex.
Personally I believe Nebraska was another location. We do know that there are different locations of fnaf as it’s said during the games so I think he was kidnapping the brother for another location.
So i would like to share some of my thoughts. The mask that was used at the start of the film and almost used on mike i believe is the reference and a show of what happens when you get caught by the animations. where they are stuffing you in a particular suit.
and yeah i woulda liked the blackout scene, maybe during the end where they all turn on Afton, the lights go out and the iconic scene plays from freddy
When max and the gang broke it, they entered through a side door that was not locked. and we were told that vandels do break in and it was Mike's job to ensure no one breaks in. As Afton was only a career manager, if any other bosses learned that it was destroyed AFTER Mike "closed up" then it would be seen as negligence on mike's behalf, which again could cause him to lose that job if any one other than Afton himself owned that place. It does make sense on why no one talked about the sudden disappearance of max and them as well Mike more than likely assumed Max got tired of not being paid so she just chooses not to talk to him. Which would be a understanding leap for mike as he was already not very good mentally. And Aunt Jane did not say anything as she did not want to be tied back to the fact she hired them to destroy the place. Considering when this movie took place, people not appearing for a few days is not too uncommon as each one was stated to be a negative piece of society.
Max's death was to make ppl feel remorse about her dying. She clearly was not comfortable with what was going on, but did show that for the fact she allowed it to happen instead of going to the police or telling mike, she was just as responsible. Heck there is a good chance that Max met Jane one day while working for Mike, as Mike more than likely told Max about parts of the situation with Jane.
I do wish we learned if Jane had been oofed by golden freddy or not, but for all we know it could be something to be talked about in the next movie.
I think the pacing was kinda speratic was on purpose. To Emulate how it felt in game where sometimes it felt slow, dull and overall kind of just building the tension. While other parts were super fact where things happen so fast
I feel like a lot of the missed opportunities in the writing are done as a way for ppl wanting more things for the next film. Is this a good writing style? eh no not particularly but can be done well.
Lastly, with the bodies being in the animatronics, yeah woulda been cool if they actually addressed the fact that the bodies were hidden in there, slowly decaying with mucus and blood seeping from the suits
Great video. I only knew fnaf through my kids telling me the lore while making me play custom nights. I enjoyed this movie knowing some of the lore and am know going to play the first couple games. My favorite part of this movie is that my kids really like it. It's the start of their possibly love of scary movies they can watch with me in the future.
Sorry babe, can’t come to dinner tonight, new Minaxa video just dropped.
I think the Freddy mask thing was based on this passage from the first night of the first game:
"Uh now concerning your safety, the only real risk to you as a night watchman here, if any, is the fact that these characters, uh, if they happen to see you after hours, probably won't recognize you as a person. They'll [p- they'll] most likely see you as a metal endoskeleton without its costume on. Now since that's against the rules here at Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, they'll probably try to... ..forcefully stuff you inside a Freddy Fazbear suit. Um... now that wouldn't be so bad if the suits themselves weren't filled with crossbeams, wires, and animatronic devices, especially around the facial area. So you could imagine how having your head forcefully pressed inside one of those could cause a bit of discomfort... ..and death. Uh, the only parts of you that would likely see the light of day again would be your eyeballs and teeth when they pop out the front of the mask, heh."
I think a lot of people dont understand critics. Like their job is to criticize the story and be nitpicky, not just reviewing soley based on enjoyment. Like personally, the movie was great I had fun watching it and had a good time but also I can acknowledge that the story writting was meh to bad. Thats why there are 2 different sections on rotten tomatoes, one for the critics and one for the fans cause both groups view the movie differently
If there will be a FNAF 2, I think it'll be cool if Michael Afton would be the main antagonist and Springtrap wouldn't appear until the climax or not in it at all. Watching the end of the movie, I really thought it would be cool if it would be like a Jigsaw-Amanda scenario where Michael would carry on his father's legacy.
Your point about this being about "not being able to let go of the past" is so true! :O
For references to things out side of the core three games, there is Vanessa as a character, clearly inspired by Vanessa/Vanny in the games, and Circus Baby off the top of my head.
I actually find it kinda interesting how, for most of the points you list in the "part where [you] call it bad", I feel completely in the opposite direction about them. Vanessa being expo dump? I actually had no clue wtf she meant half of the time. Like, I knew she was dropping lore here and there, but other than that she was way too vague for me to make any sense of her character. The pacing of the climax? It actually felt slightly slow, mostly because it was very back-and-forth, but I *liked* it. The responses and reactions of characters? For Mike, as an example, I felt like his "go to Hell" line was soooooo fucking realistic. Like yes get his ass!!!! If I was just run ragged by a bunch of robots and tackled by a 200 lb grown man in a 100 lb robot suit who turned out to be my brother's killer, I too would feel angry enough to do something, but too incapacitated to make that action physical. A simple "go to Hell" was so much more effective (and real asf too, if i had the chance to tell that to W.A. i would lolol) than some emo lament or whatever the alternative from Mike would be.
Either way, I agree with your points about missed potential and pacing. A longer movie with quicker pacing would be so much better. But let's address the real problem in the room... why did Mike's mom leave to get paper towel when she dumped her drink mostly on the grass???? LADY JUST LEAVE IT BE LIKE DAMN 😭
The second you uploaded this video I was literally seeing the FNaF movie and imo its a really good movie, there are so much references like the chica's rainbow ice cream shop or that he wakes up at 6AM, I feel like its an incredible movie, I give it a 9,5/10
Minaxa you are a legend. This is the ONLY way this movie should be viewed. It’s based off the original game which had a simple storyline. They followed the storyline and added some bits and pieces of “character” for the animatronics. After all, they’re still kids.
The thing with max I think was done perfectly. Nothing hurts more then seeing a character who can improve, who will improve be snuffed out befire they get the chancd
Yet another great video as always, are you ever gonna do about a video about Five night's a Wario's?
Right on, very accurate review and I pretty much agree with most of it, good video and what a movie I enjoyed every single second and can’t wait to watch it again 🙌
I don't think they where in Nebraska when Garrett was kidnapped, I think that poster just made mike remember that moment
I was really surprised that my parents liked it, and they both know nothing about FNAF. If my parents really liked it, why didn't the critics?
Either your parents don't watch other movies or they are just saying they liked it to make you feel better.
And I'm saying that as someone who is a big FNaF fan
I agree with all the points in the good parts. I think they’re running into the monster verse issues where they focus too much on the humans. Where things can be trimmed down. My main bad thing is the “house” scene. That’s when the movie started to feel like a fan fic or a SFM movie. It felt even more like a fan fic once Vanessa revealed William is her father. It seemed pretty confused on how what the movie wanted to be. But I’m still amazed we actually got a movie. I remember seeing it in development hell and I actually believed we were never getting a movie. Glad to be proven wrong
I think the torture mask was the equal to like, the eyeball popping out stuffed in a suit gameover screen but because it's the guy it has to be more intentional.
I dont think i have seen literally anybody bring this up somehow, maybe its just cause its obvious, but I really liked in the call between afton and mike that afton basically just started reciting phone guy lines. obvious but idk I just liked that part a lot
honestly up untill 23:16 i agreed with every bad point but i think for this one specifically the reason mike doesnt react to afton is because he still doesnt know who killed his brother, the children never told him (which yes is still a minor plot hole considering the deal they made but whatever)
No, he explicitly finds out in his conversation with Vanessa because the picture of her as a kid has her holding the orange toy plane that Garett had when he was kidnapped. The movie is quite in your face about it lol
Good point, I don't know why I didn't register that part at first watch, mb
18:30 dont remember when but vanessa mentions how he cant be forgetful and leave the place unlocked. I believed she called it Criminal Negligence and how hes responsible for the break in.
my theory with william afton being in nebraska is that it was a targeted attack on the schmitt family… i think theres a good chance that mike’s dad is the movies version of henry, and therefore garrets death is similar to charlie in the games 🤧
it would make sense to me if afton stalked the schmitt family out on their vacation, which also would make afton recognizing mike make even more sense,,, not just the brother of his first victim, but the son of his business partner
The torture mask was the equivalent to stuffing the night guard in a Fazbear suit.
Critics expected a good horror movie, but what we got was a good fnaf movie and thats all we need
I wouldn’t even say it was a good fnaf movie, just fun to watch for SOME fnaf fans.
Not really a good fnaf movie either
It's theorized that the whole Nebraska thing is because mikes father is supposed to be henry (we can see someone who looks an awful lot like the father working on the animatronics in the training tape) and Afton did his whole revenge ark against henry. It's unknown if its the same ark as in the books or games, but that's what we think it is most likely as scott usually think about things before just having them exist. Chances are that afton wanted revenge on henry so took garret when they were on vacation in the woods as afton could clear his name with a false alibi if needed and basically completely clears him of suspicion anyways. There's more to it, but I'm tired of typing so yeah
Hey, thats the bear! From five nights at freddys!
The most sensical theory about the killer Freddy mask I've found is that it's used to harvest remnant.
This movie is 100% best watched by going in expecting it to be a drama comedy, not a horror movie. I went in with absolutely no expectations, and I loved it completely.
I loved it !! I think it was an amazing adaptation of fnaf 1.. i did gripe at first about the weird lore jumbles but thats kinda hard to get right in a movie 😅
I really liked this movie when they ( *spoilers* ) when they played the fnaf fan song by TheLivingTombstone as the end credits song.
I was also disappointed that the Freddy blackout tune didn’t show
I personally give it 9/10 but these are some excellent criticisms. I was 16 when FNAF came out originally so I sorta grew up with the franchise as well and even used Multimedia Fusion in high school which is in the same family as Clickteam Fusion 2.5. 4 in particular used to give me anxiety when I would think about it, sitting in my room, sleep deprived. I kept imagining the nightmare animatronics in my room. I even had a dream with red eyes and fangs in the darkness but I was the jump scare, lunging at them. I'd say the movie was definitely worth the 8-year wait. I laughed at Max getting bitten in half and joked that it was the Bite of 2000.
I respectfully disagree. I was a lot younger when FNAF first came out, and I absolutely loved the original games and the lore behind them. But this movie frustrated the hell out of me, I genuinely felt so empty when it finished, unlike other fans that were cheering and clapping. I was left so disappointed and it’s truly one of the most disappointing movies I’ve ever seen. Not worth the 8 year wait.
@@AlexMartinez-nj9io I can definitely see why people might be disenfranchised. It suffers from the same problem as Illumination's Mario movie in that it relies on references and could have done a lot more.
Generally, I’ve found that movies that do some things extremely well but also have serious rough edges tend to be really interesting to analyze, and I think this movie fits that description. It actually kind of reminds me of Pokémon: The First Movie (both the Japanese and localized versions), which have a similar divide between critics and the target audience.
150 million on opening weekend baby
Honestly, as a life-long FNAF fan, while the movie isn't perfect and has many flaws with its story and scares, I must say that I'm really glad to see that the has finally come out after 8 long years in development hell.
i’m 100% with you on not liking/understanding the freddy sawblade head. it just felt kinda cheap? like i remember in fnaf 1, the animatronics stuff people in suits and that’s explained away by saying they mistake them for endoskeletons, but i can’t imagine why they would need strap an endoskeleton to a saw-trap like chair.
The endoskeletons would sit in the chair for maintenance but not strapped down, that was added by William or someone so the Torture Freddy head could kill them.