Pentagon Asked How SCOTUS Immunity Ruling Could Complicate Troops' Ability To Defy 'Immoral' Orders

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 21. 08. 2024
  • Pentagon Press Secretary Pat Ryder was asked about the Supreme Court's ruling on Presidential immunity and how it could affect troops' ability to defy traditionally illegal or immoral orders.
    Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
    account.forbes...
    Stay Connected
    Forbes on Facebook: forbes
    Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
    Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
    More From Forbes: forbes.com

Komentáře • 66

  • @robroberts7093
    @robroberts7093 Před měsícem +5

    A national military of citizens replaced with a foreign military of insurgents and these generals are more then happy to play along.

    •  Před měsícem

      What are you talking about?

  • @GregPrine
    @GregPrine Před měsícem +4

    Well, that was the most disconcerting answer, from a military official, I have ever heard

    • @Max14163
      @Max14163 Před měsícem

      Sammy Davis Jr. & Gregory Hines couldn't tap dance like that.

  • @rhoeft3617
    @rhoeft3617 Před měsícem +12

    Good god. The narrative engineers at the state-run media really are that stupid!

    • @Nonononono12345-o
      @Nonononono12345-o Před měsícem

      @@rhoeft3617 yes.

    •  Před měsícem

      State run? Who is running it?

    • @Nonononono12345-o
      @Nonononono12345-o Před měsícem

      @@rhoeft3617 maybe more accurate to say, the media that adores the current administration instead of doing its job in exposing all, factually. Its freedom is enshrined in the constitution as a check on government.

    • @rhoeft3617
      @rhoeft3617 Před měsícem +1

      Seriously???

  • @crazysquirrel9425
    @crazysquirrel9425 Před měsícem +1

    Troops swear to uphold the CONSTITUTION (first), then LAWFUL ORDERS.

  • @juanvaldez4575
    @juanvaldez4575 Před měsícem +3

    but, but, the famous austrian corporal followers where just following orders.

  • @nancyp1513
    @nancyp1513 Před měsícem +17

    We are not a democracy. We are a Constitutional Republic! Big difference!

    • @MikeW165
      @MikeW165 Před měsícem +8

      A republic is a type of democracy, by definition

    • @Elvengem
      @Elvengem Před měsícem

      on the way to being a republican republic,not a republic of true representatives for the people,only the oligarchy in the long run.

    • @yt_energy
      @yt_energy Před měsícem +1

      how so?

    •  Před měsícem +1

      @@yt_energy Bot. That's a bot answer.

    • @yt_energy
      @yt_energy Před měsícem +2

      Or it could be a person asking you to qualify the difference.

  • @Elvengem
    @Elvengem Před měsícem +1

    the founders should have written term limits for judicial branch to avoid that too much power but why they forgot is dumb of them. now article 2 section 4 means nothing from scotus conservatives.

  • @quartytypo
    @quartytypo Před měsícem

    Supreme Court should not be exempt from prosecution by local DAs.

  • @DarleneBassett
    @DarleneBassett Před měsícem

    Bravo!!! Thank you!

  • @fo6rf7rl4u
    @fo6rf7rl4u Před měsícem

    Remove all troops if Trump wants troops, he can be the only troop there is if he got to have immunity so bad no man nor woman should have to pay for another man’s ego

  • @ruthnovena40
    @ruthnovena40 Před měsícem +4

    THIS is what they bother to ask?

  • @greebuh
    @greebuh Před měsícem +1

    Damn ear any order they give is immoral

  • @Nonononono12345-o
    @Nonononono12345-o Před měsícem +1

    No, it does not complicate the refusal illegal orders at all.

    • @MikeW165
      @MikeW165 Před měsícem +2

      Except all orders are legal now

    • @Nonononono12345-o
      @Nonononono12345-o Před měsícem

      @@MikeW165 not true at all. No matter what msnbc, npr, and the view might say.

    • @MikeW165
      @MikeW165 Před měsícem +2

      @@Nonononono12345-o he has immunity then all of his actions impractical terms are legal

    • @MikeW165
      @MikeW165 Před měsícem +2

      @@Nonononono12345-o don’t follow orders, you go to jail. No consequences for him.
      People will follow the orders

    • @Nonononono12345-o
      @Nonononono12345-o Před měsícem

      @@MikeW165 then impeach him

  • @clintongriffin2077
    @clintongriffin2077 Před měsícem +1

    We have a successful system of checks and Balances. Only one side is asking crazy questions about the gears working

    • @Elvengem
      @Elvengem Před měsícem

      judicial branch isnt balanced.Its living like vatican popes.

  • @hithere2076
    @hithere2076 Před měsícem +5

    WE ARE NOT A DEMOCRACY, I'M SO TIRED OF HEARING ABOUT DEMOCRACY. WE ARE A REPUBLIC

    • @MikeW165
      @MikeW165 Před měsícem +8

      A republic is a type of democracy, by definition lol

    • @colleenc9286
      @colleenc9286 Před měsícem +1

      ​@MikeW165 no it is not by definition

    • @MikeW165
      @MikeW165 Před měsícem +1

      @@colleenc9286 you clearly don’t know what the definition of democracy is

    • @Elvengem
      @Elvengem Před měsícem +1

      if its only a republic,then representatives and senators can get elected by people but mainly big money donations,and serve to represent the oligarchy mainly. Yes,that is why a republic favors oligarchy.we are led by special interests,and not want the majority of people need.

    •  Před měsícem

      It used to be a Republic before Republicans stacked the courts, changed the laws and installed a king.

  • @jeffhobbs3948
    @jeffhobbs3948 Před měsícem

    Our mitary is dei so we all know that has damaged their abilities.

  • @Z-Bart
    @Z-Bart Před měsícem

    "We follow orders son or people die. It's that simple". - A Few Good Men. Colonel Nathan R Jessup.

  • @user-kj1od5ed7p
    @user-kj1od5ed7p Před měsícem +2

    fjb God bless Donald Trump fjb let's go brandon I agree fjb and everyone who supports him fjb

    • @Elvengem
      @Elvengem Před měsícem +3

      hail to your dictator.

    • @user-kj1od5ed7p
      @user-kj1od5ed7p Před měsícem

      @@Elvengem dictator for one day only

    • @Elvengem
      @Elvengem Před měsícem

      @@user-kj1od5ed7p then he is already preparing to signing laws now in preparation for that one day.Scotus conservatives are prepared for the dictatorship and so is the oligarchy.

    • @Max14163
      @Max14163 Před měsícem

      @@user-kj1od5ed7p Do you know what recursion is? It's kind of like how you really only need one wish instead of the usual three.