Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods book 2 - Introduction to Philosophy
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 07. 2024
- Get Cicero's Collected Works - amzn.to/2H05eXt
Support my work here - / sadler or here - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM
Philosophy tutorials - reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
Take classes with me - reasonio.teachable.com/
In this lecture/discussion video from my Spring 2013 Introduction to Philosophy class at Marist College, we continue our study of Cicero's work On the Nature of the Gods, now focusing on book 2, in which the Stoic philosopher, Balbus, presents his school's position on divine matters. We discuss the Stoic conception of God/the gods, why the divine would care about the universe, and five classic arguments for the existence of God
If you'd like to support my work producing videos like this, become a Patreon supporter! Here's the link to find out more - including the rewards I offer backers: / sadler
You can also make a direct contribution to help fund my ongoing educational projects, by clicking here: www.paypal.me/ReasonIO
If you're interested in philosophy tutorial sessions with me - especially on Cicero or Stoicism more generally! - click here: reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
My videos are used by students, lifelong learners, other professors, and professionals to learn more about topics, texts, and thinkers in philosophy, religious studies, literature, social-political theory, critical thinking, and communications. These include college and university classes, British A-levels preparation, and Indian civil service (IAS) examination preparation
#Cicero #Ethics #Philosophy
(Amazon links are associate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases)
new Intro to Philosophy video -- continuing through Cicero's On the Nature of the Gods
interesting. thank you.
You're welcome
Well, it depends on what you mean by "use".
If you mean to convince everyone of the existence of God or gods by it, not likely, since many people aren't going to accept the very idea of degrees of being.
If you mean, once that general idea has been accepted, to prove God exists, is personal, etc. perhaps yes, perhaps no. Plotinus was a neo-Platonist who has something non-personal at the apex -- but perhaps he just wasn't as good of a Platonist as he ought to have been!