I'm a +25 or so. His 7 is right around my 9 iron. His drive is right around my 5 iron. Unless he's got absolute control over where the ball lands, there is no way that he can get to a 25% par, 75% bogie game. Might have been an off day, otherwise, no way he's under 90.
He might have his index at an easy course and plays the front tees. If he is playing anything but front tees there is no way he would break 100. His swing looked absolutely terrible lol.
@@johnr.1592 that 118 yard 7 iron made me giggle a little bit. 118 is a solid sand wedge in most cases. That means he is approaching greens with a hybrid or something... there is zero chance he is a 12 unless he plays front tees and a very easy and very short golf course. Not buying it lol.
The correct way to choose a golf ball to play is to test them on the green - putting - and around the green - chipping and pitching. Don't worry about 2 yards off the driver, or off irons. Play the ball that you can score low with. The one that performs the best for you on and around the greens.
Id imagine a lot of the how it stopped/spun feelings were due to how they hit it at the time. My advice to them all is game an AD333 and spend the change on a nice Whisky at the 19th
I’m a professional golfer and played with some of our members in a tournament a long time ago. It was the head golf professionals team. In our practice round I shot 2 under par and lost to our 18 handicap member. Lol talk about a bunch of bs. His best round ever is all I heard all day lol. Yea - right lol Best part is that I entered that round of his in the computer when we got back to our golf course :)
I've found a range ball out on the course the other day and messing around 80y away from the green. stuck it and spun it back 3ft. it was pretty wore out looking and faded lol
The test was very enlightening. My only complaint, as others have commented, is the golfers selected. Gap in driving distance between the 12 handicap and scratch golfer is almost 120 yards. 160 yards vs 280 yards. The average golfer is at 219 yards. No one in the test came close to representing an average golfer. I'm guessing you selected 2 of your students and 2 old guys hanging around the putting green with nothing better to do. Second from the tests, Titleist appears to be a middle of the pack . Nothing special. Third, there are tons of guys running around claiming +3-4 Handicaps. Average tour pro is +5-6 and they are winning U.S Opens and Masters championships. Many of the self proclaimed +3-4's couldn't win their city championship.
Great test, glad TGW used different handicaps instead of scratch level. Ken is no 12 handicap as many of you can clearly tell, he's the guy that will claim he shot par or bogey on a hole when you know for a fact he took more. Wedge play is something you can tell that is different in someone approaching single digit handicap and he's probably really good at the foot wedge. I play with seniors and one in particular is in his mid 80s and often shoots in the low to mid 80s from the middle tees and he's a 14.
I prefer the Nitro 12 pack for nine bucks yellow golfballs. If I'm hitting it good, the ball doesn't matter. If I'm hitting it bad, the ball really really doesn't matter.
Blue Tees for Ken if he is 70 yrs of age or older. He probably has a wizard short game and can putt. Who cares if he can only hit the drive 160yds, this is the beauty of the the game of golf, different people of different age with different swings and different skills, can compete against each other on a level playing field, thanks to the handicap system. What a great game and a game for life. ⛳️
Great video! I am shocked that the Z-Star XV got any hold on the greens. I have had the opposite experience. I would love to look at some of this data and help you guys visualize it in future, if you would be interested!
I don't understand how there can be such a significant distance gap between some of the top end balls. Really makes no sense to me. I know it says they took the numbers from their best shot but close to a 30 yard difference on some? Odd.
Interesting test results. I think you should have included a mid handicapper who can drive the ball around 200 yds. Your testers' driving distances are too much on the extremes comparing to the average men driving distance.
I played with a couple of older women who hit every drive around 150 yards. Always straight and their approaches were always on the green. They played bogey golf or better all day long.
I've played with those guys, they don't count every shot and pick up after two puts and take boggie. The shot of Ken hitting that seven iron should tell you he's not a 12.
My grandpa hits it 230, shot a 77 yesterday at a par 70 from the black tees, is a 11 handicap. Distance doesn’t matter if your always in the fairway and great short game.
Growing up I used to get my ass wooped by annoying old timers like him. Cocky 14 yr old with "potential and a beautiful swing" and my ass was handed to me regularly. I was also a pretty good squash player and the same thing happened. Moral of the story? Do what needs to be done to win.
Apart from the scratch golfer (maybe), there is absolutely no justification for paying 40 bucks for 12 balls. There are plenty of balls out there at half the price or less that will perform very well and feel perfectly adequate for players who prefer hard or soft balls. Of course, if money is no object, then let them buy what they want. But golf would greatly benefit in general if we promoted the idea that it is a sport for everybody, and not just for people who have money to burn.
A totally inconclusive test. the results are all over the place and just show there really is not a lot of difference between any of the balls, some spin better for different players but dont go as far, others are better feel . would like to see them also include Titleist tru soft, Srixon soft feels or Q stars and bridgestone E6 . results would be similar.
Agreed, I think this test was probably a fair measure of feel and perception for each of the players, but the performance gaps had to be primarily related to strike more than the balls themselves.
That's assuming all of these players pay that close of attention to the ball. I think that's what this test was trying to show, that if you find a ball you like and one that performs, you should give it more attention.
Good test, but I wished you would have used the Wilson Fifty golf ball in this test. The Wilson Fifty is a real good ball for a 1/4 of the price. We gave them the nickname ProVwilson.
Corek BleedingHollow not really true, a softer ball off the face of the putter affects distance and feel causing a inconsistent stroke and roll depending on the ball. Always best to chose a ball that not only feels the best from 150 in but also a ball that feels good off the tee and on the green just a thought
I'm with you. If Marvin or Ken walked in my shop today, I'd get the Wilson Staff DUO in their hands. Maybe the DUO Spin for Ken. But, they are very affordable and a great ball for the average golfer (which Marvin certainly is and Ken seems to be, despite what he says his handicap is.) Furthermore, I play the Wilson FG Tour (I'm between a 3.5 - 5 handicap, depending on how often I'm getting to get out of the office/shop) and that ball is great. Love the Urethane cover. Jumps off the driver and iron faces, but still offers good control around greens.
If Ken is playing off the forward tees, I could see a 12. His short game is likely killer. Also, look at how much he enjoys the game. I'd play with Ken any day of the week.
Poor data analysis. The low cap data showed tp5x his best overall option and the Callaway way down the list. Feel is important but point out the obvious best for his game and side by side them. The other data for ultra premium low spin urethane balls does not apply for people who carry driver 120 period. Get more applicable test players, very easy to do. Love the idea, fail in execution truthfully
So basically stay down and you can and will hit any ball. I think this stuff is funny. I use whatever ball I pick out of the woods or creeks. I always beat my brother who spends top $ for Pro V1 balls... cracks me up. I was using MaxFli balls this weekend and used 2 balls all round. I shot an 82 and was stoked! He shot a 91 with all PRO V1 balls.
Hi ....there's NO way a 26 yards difference between pro v1 ball against chrome soft with the driver with the guy with 0 HCP. Something is wrong !!! Phil Mickelson ( almost 50years old ) plays with chrome soft and hits the ball like the young guys that hits the ball more than 300 yds.
Snell MTB Black. Try a dozen. The best ball for the money. They really do compare to Titleist Pro V1's. They just don't pay tour pros to wear their hat etc.
No way theres a 30 yard gap between the avx and chrome soft with those numbers. Hes obviously not a plus 4 with such inconsistency. His ball speed has to be all over the place which, assuming his swing speed is relatively consistent, means hes not hitting the ball in the middle of the face very often.
Boy, Marvin was getting some REALLY high spin rates on that AVX, which makes no sense. I've tested that ball and watched testing of it and that thing does not ever get that kind of spin. Usually, the Pro V1X destroys it in spin. But Marvin was getting more spin with the Pro V1X? Hmm..
The actual facts when it comes to choice of golf balls ( as far as amateur golfers are concerned ). The average amateur golfer does not posses the skills to tell one ball from another ,, and that's how it is ,,
Looking forward to the results at the end of the tests only to be disappointed that there were no conclusions. It may have been fun to do but it was a waste of time to watch.
What was the criteria here? One shot with each ball regardless of strike? Using a 7 iron, Austin hit the Pro V1X 169 but could only must 145 with the Pro V1? Ridiculous. Obviously he struck the X way better because there is no way there is a disparity like that between the two balls.
Doesn't mean a damn thing, it shows that every shot can be different depending on how it contacts the face of the club which was omitted in this study. Ball speed is directly related to club head speed. You're not going to hit a distance of 200 yards with a club head speed 30 mph, just not going to happen. In order to hit 300 yards the club head speed needs to be over 100 mph.
Great test guys but snell mtd black and red should have been in test much cheaper as good as any ball ever made just do not waste cost paying tour pros which is outrageous in the costs Thank you Dean Snell
Bill Ryan I will have to tryout the Snell. I played with a guy who hit them well. Don’t sleep on the Wilson Fifty, it is a great ball at an awesome price.
this looks like it was conducted in a decidedly unscientific way and had a small sample size. It seems perception was collected more than anything else.
Im 63 and I don't want balls tested by the Dawn of the Dead.. I was a golf professional in my 20s and these guys couldn't break a window. Not representative of most players
Save some money, go with the 333 or q star from srixon, then when you loose or scuff one you don't have to be upset at loosing four dollars on your shot. Instead you can always remember the random CZcams guy who saved you two dollars on the srixon ball you just lost.
The 25 handicapper swing was so bad, and so slow there is no way he could tell the difference or form any worthwhile opinion. His preference for AVX on that little downhill shot proves it. Around the green the AVX is just about the least dependable ball Titleist makes.
I completely agree. I have improved my ball striking to the extent that I can tell a difference between golf balls. All of the tested balls are marketed for skilled players, anyone is free to buy them. I happen to play Titleist because they are made in USA. Buy golf balls you like and can afford to lose.
I know Ken. he is a solid 12! On a 9 hole par 3 course.
right? he's a 12? if he's a 12 im a scratch
I loved those two 30 footers going in at the same time. That's a one in a million shot right there.
Sorry The best balls are the free ones you find in the bush
get a job instead of getting up at the crack of noon, and go buy yourself some z stars bud
To anyone wondering: The AVX is designed to be low spin on driver/woods. You can still get short game spin with it because it has a urethane cover.
feels horrible and cheap. doesn't feel premium. will it spin or not.
If Ken is a 12, I'm a tour pro.
He's actually a solid 12. My arse.
I'm a +25 or so. His 7 is right around my 9 iron. His drive is right around my 5 iron. Unless he's got absolute control over where the ball lands, there is no way that he can get to a 25% par, 75% bogie game. Might have been an off day, otherwise, no way he's under 90.
LMAO 150 Avg on his driver.
He might have his index at an easy course and plays the front tees. If he is playing anything but front tees there is no way he would break 100. His swing looked absolutely terrible lol.
@@johnr.1592 that 118 yard 7 iron made me giggle a little bit. 118 is a solid sand wedge in most cases. That means he is approaching greens with a hybrid or something... there is zero chance he is a 12 unless he plays front tees and a very easy and very short golf course. Not buying it lol.
The correct way to choose a golf ball to play is to test them on the green - putting - and around the green - chipping and pitching. Don't worry about 2 yards off the driver, or off irons. Play the ball that you can score low with. The one that performs the best for you on and around the greens.
exactly- z star is pretty balanced all around ball. not the farthest, or the launch angle , but it does everything very very commendable
Id imagine a lot of the how it stopped/spun feelings were due to how they hit it at the time. My advice to them all is game an AD333 and spend the change on a nice Whisky at the 19th
I’m a professional golfer and played with some of our members in a tournament a long time ago. It was the head golf professionals team. In our practice round I shot 2 under par and lost to our 18 handicap member. Lol talk about a bunch of bs. His best round ever is all I heard all day lol. Yea - right lol
Best part is that I entered that round of his in the computer when we got back to our golf course :)
I've found a range ball out on the course the other day and messing around 80y away from the green. stuck it and spun it back 3ft. it was pretty wore out looking and faded lol
The test was very enlightening. My only complaint, as others have commented, is the golfers selected. Gap in driving distance between the 12 handicap and scratch golfer is almost 120 yards. 160 yards vs 280 yards. The average golfer is at 219 yards. No one in the test came close to representing an average golfer. I'm guessing you selected 2 of your students and 2 old guys hanging around the putting green with nothing better to do.
Second from the tests, Titleist appears to be a middle of the pack . Nothing special.
Third, there are tons of guys running around claiming +3-4 Handicaps. Average tour pro is +5-6 and they are winning U.S Opens and Masters championships. Many of the self proclaimed +3-4's couldn't win their city championship.
The Titleist PRO v1 is a good distance ball, but is hyped beyond compare
Shocked that the ChromeSoft distances seem to be so short.
Great test, glad TGW used different handicaps instead of scratch level. Ken is no 12 handicap as many of you can clearly tell, he's the guy that will claim he shot par or bogey on a hole when you know for a fact he took more. Wedge play is something you can tell that is different in someone approaching single digit handicap and he's probably really good at the foot wedge. I play with seniors and one in particular is in his mid 80s and often shoots in the low to mid 80s from the middle tees and he's a 14.
Marvin is “self proclaimed 25”...made me smile. Marvin must be a classic sandbagger.
Shoots ~80 consistently.
Marvin is my spirit animal, I use whatever golf ball comes in the used bag from walmart. 48 balls for 11 bucks baby!
I prefer the Nitro 12 pack for nine bucks yellow golfballs. If I'm hitting it good, the ball doesn't matter. If I'm hitting it bad, the ball really really doesn't matter.
Blue Tees for Ken if he is 70 yrs of age or older. He probably has a wizard short game and can putt. Who cares if he can only hit the drive 160yds, this is the beauty of the the game of golf, different people of different age with different swings and different skills, can compete against each other on a level playing field, thanks to the handicap system. What a great game and a game for life. ⛳️
Callaway and Bridgestone dimples are a dead giveaway but cool test.
Dang homie flamed Marvin with the “a self proclaimed 25 handicap” suggesting he is worse than that.
Great video! I am shocked that the Z-Star XV got any hold on the greens. I have had the opposite experience. I would love to look at some of this data and help you guys visualize it in future, if you would be interested!
Doesn’t hold anything for me
I don't understand how there can be such a significant distance gap between some of the top end balls. Really makes no sense to me. I know it says they took the numbers from their best shot but close to a 30 yard difference on some? Odd.
Let's base our test on what players think they are feeling. Yeah, great test.
Interesting test results. I think you should have included a mid handicapper who can drive the ball around 200 yds. Your testers' driving distances are too much on the extremes comparing to the average men driving distance.
Exactly, two testers are seniors with limited flexibility and poor swing speeds. Awful test.
Theres no way Ken is a 12 handicap with that swing and hitting his driver only 160 yards.
I played with a couple of older women who hit every drive around 150 yards. Always straight and their approaches were always on the green. They played bogey golf or better all day long.
I've played with those guys, they don't count every shot and pick up after two puts and take boggie. The shot of Ken hitting that seven iron should tell you he's not a 12.
My grandpa hits it 230, shot a 77 yesterday at a par 70 from the black tees, is a 11 handicap. Distance doesn’t matter if your always in the fairway and great short game.
Theres a big difference between a 160 yard drive and a 230 yard drive.
Growing up I used to get my ass wooped by annoying old timers like him. Cocky 14 yr old with "potential and a beautiful swing" and my ass was handed to me regularly. I was also a pretty good squash player and the same thing happened. Moral of the story? Do what needs to be done to win.
Wish you would have used a trackman or flightscope for outdoor ball data instead of a GC.
Ah yes, because a 12 handicapper hits his 7 iron shorter than my wedges.
I love how they have no mid of the line Titleist golf balls
So much talk...so little data.
What was the relative range of performance in each category?
Let's be honest... 25+ handicappers don't need "on demand stopping power" 🤣
Hey Calvin and I both tee up our drivers low to gain accuracy lol but I don’t do it all the time
I'd love to do this.
its not blind when callaway has hex dimples and Bridgestone has in dimple dimples. very easy to pick those out even from address
25 hdcp crushed his driver 128 yards. Must play a lot of par 3 courses to get down to a 25 or is that for 9 holes?
I love this, great idea, but next time could you guys include the "Kirkland Signature" golf ball?
Apart from the scratch golfer (maybe), there is absolutely no justification for paying 40 bucks for 12 balls. There are plenty of balls out there at half the price or less that will perform very well and feel perfectly adequate for players who prefer hard or soft balls. Of course, if money is no object, then let them buy what they want. But golf would greatly benefit in general if we promoted the idea that it is a sport for everybody, and not just for people who have money to burn.
A totally inconclusive test. the results are all over the place and just show there really is not a lot of difference between any of the balls, some spin better for different players but dont go as far, others are better feel .
would like to see them also include Titleist tru soft, Srixon soft feels or Q stars and bridgestone E6 .
results would be similar.
Did they only hit 1 shot per ball? I find it hard to believe Austin is consistently 30 yards shorter with the chrome soft on driver.
Agreed, I think this test was probably a fair measure of feel and perception for each of the players, but the performance gaps had to be primarily related to strike more than the balls themselves.
Says they used the best shot. Seems kind of stupid to not use an average.
@@timothykunde9922 true that. Also don't know how a scratch golfer can have a 30 yard variance between golf balls
Good concept except it’s pretty obvious which ball is the Callaway bc of the hexagon dimples
Was gunna say this.
I think the pro v1/x have the most recognizable dimple pattern. They look much bigger compared to the average golf ball.
That's assuming all of these players pay that close of attention to the ball. I think that's what this test was trying to show, that if you find a ball you like and one that performs, you should give it more attention.
Good test, but I wished you would have used the Wilson Fifty golf ball in this test. The Wilson Fifty is a real good ball for a 1/4 of the price. We gave them the nickname ProVwilson.
There's really no difference hitting the driver and putter. The more significant difference is in the 50-100 yard short game wedge shots.
Corek BleedingHollow not really true, a softer ball off the face of the putter affects distance and feel causing a inconsistent stroke and roll depending on the ball. Always best to chose a ball that not only feels the best from 150 in but also a ball that feels good off the tee and on the green just a thought
That double put though
My preferred ball is made by Range, they are not the softest ball, kind of a rock like feel.
Would've been nice to have the Wilson Staff Duo in there. I've hit some recently and been VERY impressed
Snake Doc people are sleeping on the Wilson golf balls. The Wilson Fifty is a great ball at an outstanding price.
Wilson Staff has been the “Eh” in golf the past 7 or 8 years, it’s just this year they have re-engineered their balls to be softer than ever.
I'm with you. If Marvin or Ken walked in my shop today, I'd get the Wilson Staff DUO in their hands. Maybe the DUO Spin for Ken. But, they are very affordable and a great ball for the average golfer (which Marvin certainly is and Ken seems to be, despite what he says his handicap is.)
Furthermore, I play the Wilson FG Tour (I'm between a 3.5 - 5 handicap, depending on how often I'm getting to get out of the office/shop) and that ball is great. Love the Urethane cover. Jumps off the driver and iron faces, but still offers good control around greens.
If Ken is playing off the forward tees, I could see a 12. His short game is likely killer.
Also, look at how much he enjoys the game. I'd play with Ken any day of the week.
Poor data analysis. The low cap data showed tp5x his best overall option and the Callaway way down the list. Feel is important but point out the obvious best for his game and side by side them.
The other data for ultra premium low spin urethane balls does not apply for people who carry driver 120 period. Get more applicable test players, very easy to do. Love the idea, fail in execution truthfully
You can spot a Bridgestone golf ball from a mile away... With their micro dimple and the unique Bridgestone dimple design.
A 25 hc’er shouldn’t be concerned with which golf ball he’s chunking and blading. 😃
Well feel doesn't get you anywhere and help you improve if it doesn't perform well
So basically stay down and you can and will hit any ball. I think this stuff is funny. I use whatever ball I pick out of the woods or creeks. I always beat my brother who spends top $ for Pro V1 balls... cracks me up. I was using MaxFli balls this weekend and used 2 balls all round. I shot an 82 and was stoked! He shot a 91 with all PRO V1 balls.
I would recommend the Callaway’s Chrome Soft balls, they are cheap and pretty good!
7usnain .... Nah... Pro V’s all day long😁😁
You have an interesting idea of what is "cheap": These balls are $50 a dozen!
I have 20/20 vision and can't get the damn ball to go where I want it to go half the time. Blind! I'd probably miss the damn ball completely!
I want to join Ken’s course I’ll play off +16 😁
Great review. Well done. 👍🏌⛳🇺🇸😀
Hi ....there's NO way a 26 yards difference between pro v1 ball against chrome soft with the
driver with the guy with 0 HCP.
Something is wrong !!!
Phil Mickelson ( almost 50years old ) plays with chrome soft and hits the ball like the young guys that hits the ball more than 300 yds.
I’ve found the same thing. Chromesoft is a much shorter ball with driver but about 10-15m for me. It’s the reason I don’t play it
Phil's ball is completely different than the retail ball available to us unfortunately.
Ken must only play 2 holes from 18 😁
Ken is a 12. Over par. On every hole.
Even the +4 and 0 handicap guys, don’t look like their that good. In our country we call it Hollywood or Bollywood handicap
Kenneth LoL they’re
Great blind test 👍.
very exiting video. hope you guys with over 100mph swingers blind test.
Oh come on I’ve just had my second golf lesson and I can hit the ball 200 yards there is no way he is a 12 handicap
I prefer the Top Flight Hot XL
Next test, see how many golfers can easily identify the different golf balls even without a logo.
a 25+ is not going to be about the ball, that is an inconsistent ball striker, Ken off 12, I think there are some liberties being taken on that one.
Snell MTB Black. Try a dozen. The best ball for the money. They really do compare to Titleist Pro V1's. They just don't pay tour pros to wear their hat etc.
No way theres a 30 yard gap between the avx and chrome soft with those numbers. Hes obviously not a plus 4 with such inconsistency. His ball speed has to be all over the place which, assuming his swing speed is relatively consistent, means hes not hitting the ball in the middle of the face very often.
Boy, Marvin was getting some REALLY high spin rates on that AVX, which makes no sense. I've tested that ball and watched testing of it and that thing does not ever get that kind of spin. Usually, the Pro V1X destroys it in spin. But Marvin was getting more spin with the Pro V1X? Hmm..
The actual facts when it comes to choice of golf balls ( as far as amateur golfers are concerned ). The average amateur golfer does not posses the skills to tell one ball from another ,, and that's how it is ,,
Try the duo...
Looking forward to the results at the end of the tests only to be disappointed that there were no conclusions. It may have been fun to do but it was a waste of time to watch.
Great test I think golf balls generally all perform well and you have to find what suits you best.
You didn’t remove the brand name?!
What was the criteria here? One shot with each ball regardless of strike? Using a 7 iron, Austin hit the Pro V1X 169 but could only must 145 with the Pro V1? Ridiculous. Obviously he struck the X way better because there is no way there is a disparity like that between the two balls.
Why would you tell them what they're numbers are? Of course they'll say the like the furthest traveling drives the best.
Doesn't mean a damn thing, it shows that every shot can be different depending on how it contacts the face of the club which was omitted in this study. Ball speed is directly related to club head speed. You're not going to hit a distance of 200 yards with a club head speed 30 mph, just not going to happen. In order to hit 300 yards the club head speed needs to be over 100 mph.
Great video
Great vid
Great test guys but snell mtd black and red should have been in test much cheaper as good as any ball ever made just do not waste cost paying tour pros which is outrageous in the costs Thank you Dean Snell
Bill Ryan I will have to tryout the Snell. I played with a guy who hit them well. Don’t sleep on the Wilson Fifty, it is a great ball at an awesome price.
12 hdcp and hits driver 165yds max. Sure he is
Snake Doc
Par 3 course lol
So true
The 0 player hitting a ProVx 24 yards farther than the ProV didn't make sense
I would assume he plays from the red tees with his distances. 12 hdcp seems pretty reasonable.
@@timothykunde9922 so hitting driver into par 3's. Yeah, don't think so.
Must be plus 16 if ken is 12 😁
where's the Nitro
Gotta buncha yellow ones in my bag.
Where's my Mojo? lol
WHERE IS THE NOODLE???
this looks like it was conducted in a decidedly unscientific way and had a small sample size. It seems perception was collected more than anything else.
Lost me at Ken is a 12
So you only have guys who drive it 300 or 150. Doesn't respresent the average ball striker
Marvin should stick to the top-flite
That was so awesome
calvin being +4 is a little sus
using his 10 best rounds of his career.
You can tell most of them by their dimple pattern.
I'll bet a 3 piece Kirkland would beat them all and it's a $13 a dozen ball. I play one to a 4.
now take the top 4 and compare those to cheaper balls
Im 63 and I don't want balls tested by the Dawn of the Dead.. I was a golf professional in my 20s and these guys couldn't break a window. Not representative of most players
you mean 12 per hole...
I’m not quite sure Ken has a full grasp on the handicap system. He’s double bogeying most holes at best.
Save some money, go with the 333 or q star from srixon, then when you loose or scuff one you don't have to be upset at loosing four dollars on your shot. Instead you can always remember the random CZcams guy who saved you two dollars on the srixon ball you just lost.
Ken only plays 9 holes and his hcp is 12
Sorry a 12 plus handicap have no feel.
The 25 handicapper swing was so bad, and so slow there is no way he could tell the difference or form any worthwhile opinion. His preference for AVX on that little downhill shot proves it. Around the green the AVX is just about the least dependable ball Titleist makes.
I completely agree. I have improved my ball striking to the extent that I can tell a difference between golf balls. All of the tested balls are marketed for skilled players, anyone is free to buy them. I happen to play Titleist because they are made in USA. Buy golf balls you like and can afford to lose.
...averages are way more helpfup than best shot.
Pro V1 is overrated
$4 balls are overrated.
Its nice when you find them for free hiding in the brush/bushes. Theyre nicer than the adams balls I bought for stupid cheap
Almost all urethane balls are $4 each. It’s what they cost. When you start to develop a real short game, you’ll see why urethane is important.
Go marlvin!
I can’t say anything about how anybody plays. I would love to play Pro V1. I’ll probably play Kirkland Signatuere.
It’s just a bit off banter😁