Inside Mind-Reading AI | Exponentially with Azeem Azhar
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 06. 2024
- Professor Nita Farahany reveals to Azeem Azhar the startling advancements of brain-scanning technology and the extraordinary implications this tech has for privacy and humanity.
--------
Like this video? Subscribe: czcams.com/users/Bloomberg?sub_...
Become a Quicktake Member for exclusive perks: czcams.com/users/bloombergjoin
Bloomberg Originals offers bold takes for curious minds on today’s biggest topics. Hosted by experts covering stories you haven’t seen and viewpoints you haven’t heard, you’ll discover cinematic, data-led shows that investigate the intersection of business and culture. Exploring every angle of climate change, technology, finance, sports and beyond, Bloomberg Originals is business as you’ve never seen it.
Subscribe for business news, but not as you've known it: exclusive interviews, fascinating profiles, data-driven analysis, and the latest in tech innovation from around the world.
Visit our partner channel Bloomberg Quicktake for global news and insight in an instant.
New neurotechnology devices can read and manipulate our mental states to help us relax, learn and reduce pain. As they do this, they harvest data. The question is: can we trust businesses and governments with this private information? I go into this question with Prof. Nita Farahany at length. What do you think? Have you tried any of these devices yourself?
I actually wrote my thesis on this, and have quoted Prof. Farahany at several places. Although my main focus was the metaverse, I do believe that with the blending of the physical and digital world, our cognitive liberty and privacy will be at great risk of undermined. Thanks for doing this interview and asking some thought-provoking questions. And yes, I have used devices from Emotive and Open BCI myself, it's quite scary to know that these technologies can one day be used against us.
It's not new, the public is that far behind.
Like here if you have been through this already and seek a way out..
Shun smartphones (selfie camera looking into your iris.. guess I’m right..someone has to speak up.. and here in CZcams by google.. they are into AI as well.. trust whom..Wikipedia..open source..??
We already legally own our own thoughts. They are OUR thoughts.
This should be illegal. The sanctity of the human mind should be respected.
It's happening to me ...what should I do😢
A man’s thoughts should be his own
This just introduced me to a whole line of technological progress that has apparently gone over my head in recent years. Thank's for bringing attention to this important topic! P.S: Nita Farahany also published a book about this called "The Battle for your Brain", I'm excited to give it a read.
I can't remember a more important video. Links to a couple papers, a couple products, and a couple articles at the level of Professor Farahany's book would make the series even more valuable.
0:35: 🧠 New neurotechnologies can read and manipulate our thoughts, raising concerns about privacy and data harvesting.
3:56: 🧠 Neurotechnology advancements in consumer-grade devices and implants are allowing for improved brain state reading and manipulation.
7:12: 🧠 The use of neurotechnology in law enforcement and surveillance raises concerns about privacy and ethical implications.
10:32: 🧠 A recent study used generative AI to decode language from the brain and found that it can also be applied to a portable system called fnirs.
14:12: ✅ The goal is to increase the rate of fire in the prefrontal cortex by staying focused on something difficult.
17:32: 🧠 Cognitive liberty is a new umbrella concept that encompasses the right to self-expression and the right to mental privacy.
21:09: 💡 The speaker suggests recognizing cognitive liberty as an international human right and updating existing human rights to include mental privacy.
Recap by Tammy AI
Finally. After decades of posting on my Facebook feed about BMI and remote BMI. It's even in my sci-fi, Tell No Lies But Keep Secrets, as a way to tell about the tech without getting tortured.
Would you guys be able to put the product descriptions please?
We've long been in the Infiltration stages, creating tons of new gangstalkers
I 100% agree these brain interfaces should be available for personal use, but NOT for business use of the data. We already have numerous spying methods being used on our person and phones. I foresee as these develop that businesses will try to determine our state of mind and thoughts for commercial usage and selling purposes. I also expect we will quickly find tools and methods to prevent such invasions. Imagine some wireless inspection of people's minds, and people purchasing blockers against such things. This would be a huge market on both sides.
It shouldn't be a ____ market to begin with!
@@flickwtchr I love the concept of the personal, but the commercial will start no matter what once developed. So we really don't have a say. Maybe they can read our minds and determine we have no money then just leave us alone. :-)
12:50 Keep in mind that corporations/organizations are not interested in your wellbeing. They just want to consume you as a resource and if making you not hate what you're doing enables this then it's a win.
Excellent interview. It opened a whole new perspective.
This... was really nice. The man asks great questions.
Thought police , thought criminals,thought court , thought rights .
The future ... Both scary and fascinating
well …. I can see China looking at this with greedy eyes… imagine wearing this will be mandatory and all data is collected by the CCP
Very informative video.
How will they allow people to legally own their thoughts when thoughts can be inserted into the mind through frequency weapons like Voice to Skull (V2K)?
we should be able to legally own our thoughts RIGHT NOW!!!
Mans flirting through the whole interview lol I respect it
She was flirting back 😂
Unfortunately, the endgame here is not in the best interest of humanity.
well, whose end game is it, then?
Works two ways, bring it 🏁
Interviewing a law professor instead of a neuropsychology professor about the effects of electrical stimulation of the brain really shows your bias for sensationalism. It's really hard to take this seriously whatsoever.
What's not sensational about technology that can absolutely lead to repressed humans by authoritarian governments? Read some books.
sensationalism? sensational indeed! Another word for Embodied.
It's predominantly a discussion on ethics and the potential legal implications of this technology...hence the law expert.
It might be another dataset they are adding on to the technology, another study. Since she is a lawyer with multiple degrees she probably saw the data before in an interrogation brainwave study.
wow
Oi!
When are there going to be AI german language versions of this video available?
Where's the EMF exposure rate?
Same as Bluetooth option?
• Radio Frequency, (mW)? ~ 25mW?
• Electric Field (V)?
• Magnetic Field (mG)?
Name of the application plz
A more "out there" sci-fi speculation on this that I have wondered about is that when we are able to aggregate minds into hivemind-like emergent selves (passed some "integration threshold") *would a huge reorientation of values result*? This inference is relying on the notion of "the self" being "smeared" (differentially weighted) across brain's historically evolved strata (with their specific functional emphasis and thus each strata's corresponding spatiotemporal niches). And would some of this larger self's reorientation or re-weighting mean that inhibition would be applied directly to those lower connected minds? Would it be applied to their personal higher-selves or lower-selves evenly?
To put it more poetically since "the self" functionally speaking has to "loop" in a fractal way just as we see with the faint-self we see in each of our cells, and since the mind develops under an ordering tendency/constraint, then would a higher-id emerge first before a much later "ego" and then "super-ego"? If that is the case then it would imply some seemingly terrifying things.
AI tech meets New Age gobbledygook. We are in deep ____ now.
Maybe I just should have said it more simply and with less abstraction.
Just as social media through scaling has essentially altered our social dynamics, will AI+neurotech when scaled have a similar drastic effect on the fundamental mode or characteristic of our human interactions? The reasoning of why and how that could be the case is what I tried to speculatively outline above.
to your query on a higher-id forming first, i think that will be mostly contingent upon the individual's ability to recover from the sorts of shocks you describe. each one would invariably have the effect of a potent hallucinogen, and navigating those experiences, whilst consistent in certain aspects, are largely so idiosyncratic that even were the hierarchical axioms were revealed and disrupted, the *outcomes* of these interactions would require another tier of attention from the supposed aggregation. in any case, i have seen such an aggregate, an amorphous blob, an amoeba coursing through timespace, ghosts, for lack of a better term, concatenated in a field, a sea of minds, all *producing* energy via calculations of emotion, war, pleasure, movement, perception, so i'm quite sure it *can* and *will* exist. not before nor until we find that there is a malleable area between perception and the general functions of the default and executive mode networks (among others), a sort of open, boundless space which is distinct from the mind's eye as well as the more direct experiential construct, or the noumenon's cry. this space will be occupied with the equivalent to our known "virtual" space, and unless strictly regulated by a benevolent hegemony or AI, it can and will overwhelm the individual in question
as to controlling us on a larger scale already, the quants giving the financial systems at large over to transformer models, it was all over. there is a direct methodology in controlling mankind through something so overt a resource as the clink.
If corporations weren't run by psychopaths [shows footage of Marky Mark Zuckerberg] I would be much less concerned.
Nothing is safe. Not even your own thoughts
😂😂 true
even your own body is not safe it can get sick on its own it can just die
truly nothing is safe even food we eat we don't know where they came from
@@naominjeri7827 So what's your point?
I need that depression brain resetting thing.
Gathering data brain waves is a great way for AI know what we are thinking
You be the genie pig then
@@yougetaspear7799I think they're being sarcastic
If taking a legal route doesn't work then a lot of people might need to buy cabins and start writing manifestos.
3:16 Who would have thought? 🙄
Best images jfz almost as if you saw it with youe own eyes👀🙏🏽🌎🌕☀️🦉🦅
THINK before it is ILLEGAL
enjoy it while it lasts. I am sure you are thinking a lot of illegal things. You just dont get punished for it - yet.
Periodic table 'cos i know this..... Fluorine, Argon, Neon 🤦♂
14:41 So basically it doesn't work :)
I'm very interested in brain reading to produce pictures. It would make someone's lack of artistry be able to still create something of value.
Heard of generative AI art?
@@WebStixx0000 That's not what I'm talking about. I want to produce pictures/digital objects that exactly represent what is in my mind.
I've invented things that I can't produce effectively in reality. My artistic skills and CAD skills are exceedingly bad. By the time I could get even relatively close (training, clay, etc), I've lost the concept in its fullest. Then shortly afterward, it's completely gone.
It's like figuring out a story, working it out, figuring out the key points, and then writing it down just to get to chapter two and not remembering the original idea beyond the simplest concept.
Ideas can be fleeting.
@@PaulADAigle Fair enough, I get that. Exact mind image capture would be pretty neat
And what about the arms race in the BCI segment, which will always be non-transparent?
Not for nothing does Professor Rafael Yuste compare it to the Manhattan Project.
💙
I don't want to own an Ai bot. I want it to see and understand the natural world so it can teach me.
Take a walk in the forest and read some books.
@@flickwtchr Books are limited by written language at the time it was written. Ai will give me raw data as it happens. Books and limited human perspective, is now obsolete.
Freddie Mac has hacked the mind they can see, touch, smell, and hear. Now what do we do next ?
Keep in mind this is mostly an ad for tech investment
I hate it when an interviewer asks a question and keeps interrupting the interviewee whilst they are in mid-sentence. It's annoying.
I need to speak with you I believe my mind is being read
You are a targeted individual.
There is millions of targeted individuals around the world.
You are a targeted individual.. there is a million targeted individuals around the world.
They want you to committe suicide.
Tech is getting better and now...
People can control their thoughts virtually.
Puke
Joshua T. Fornis☠️
They’re using it on me as we speak
Me too. They have been controlling my brain since mid June.
which is the media. No body has guts to say tat.
Remote Neural Hacking is real and used to destroy lives. MKUltra 2.0 the borg. Keep safe
Would you advocate these rights for potential Charles Manson type suspects? What if persistent brain activity analysis/manipulation of the population could significantly reduce abhorrent behavior? Wouldn't you make an exception?
Nothing is black and white.
Yes, Current laws allow us to capture, convict, and punish Manson types
True, but capturing, convicting, and punishing could be alot easier by giving the police all the rights they need..@@blainewishart
"Manipulating the population" is psychopathic, check yourself
They are already doing that
So your premise is horrible. Don't we "legally own our own thoughts" now? It is the hubris of AI movers and shakers that will make it to where there has to be legal protection of our own thoughts, isn't that the crux of it?
Dont worry, YOUR thoughts are probably worthless lol. But if you are an employee in a big company, they will probably own your thoughts at least during work time.
Anything produced by Bloomberg and AWS is sus.
Don't be scare of Mind reading technology because from these technologies you will be safe in this world, how ? The answer is that nobody will even think about crime and no country will took illegal secret decisions against other country etc etc and don't be scare of mind reading technology because if you are clear regarding rules and laws then what will they do with your mind ,and if you are talking about business then don't worry, the world is too fast ,if you launch something then the copy is prepared with in one day ,so all I want to say that from mind reading techology inshaaallah whole world will be safe from cruel people and cruel countries
You are completely irrational if you believe that, and I don't need a device to read your mind to know.