One of the few wealthy people who weren't portrayed as villans in the movie. In the real even many 1st class passengers helped others into the lifeboats, some even sacrificing themselves in the process. But oh well, nothing like rich man James Cameron complaining about the rich 😂
@@jeanandre6998 you don't get it, many 1st class passenger went out of their way to help more passengers into lifeboats, even sacrificing their own seat on one
The musicians -- how they stayed there playing till the end, to help calm everyone during a tagic time, caring more about the others than their own safety -- now that was heroism right there! RIP ❤
actually happened too i believe. some people broke a gate or door and were threatened with punishment by a crewman "once the ship returned to southampton"...🤣
Thomas Andrew’s prob got the best portrayal because eye whiteness accounts spoke very highly of him and how he risked everything to try to save as many as possible
I read that book and watched that movie before Cameron’s. I always thought that’s how the ship went down. I think everyone thought it just went down on a slope (diagonally). Cameron showed the reality which was far worse for the people on the ship.
Yeah but with Cameron his idea of the ship going down in half was just a Theory as he said but in the 58 version they interviewed most of the Titanic survivors and eye witnessed however most did say that they didn't see the ship as it was so dark out no one can tell and there was no moonlight or nothing with James he only interviewed the children that survived by there parents that got them off the ship now I think 1 or 2 of them were only infants at the time all they got to say was what there parents told them which still doesn't give a whole clearer picture but whose to know if ots the truth or untruth maybe mere excaduration. (Sorry).
@@QuiGonJinn1993there are ways to figure out that it broke in half besides whether there survivors saw it happen (because it was a black moonless night so they wouldn’t have seen it). They just wouldn’t have known until they wreck was found, now that it’s been found it’s clear what happened based on a number of factors including the boat being in two pieces a half mile apart on the ocean floor, the clean break, and the fact that only the stern imploded.
@@QuiGonJinn1993the survivors all said the ship broke in half nobody believed them and thought they may just be talking from a place of trauma but then they realized it was true when it was found in the 80’s
How did I have no idea that there was a titanic movie in 1958 I love old movies…must go watch right now I have two hours until I have to be back to work!!
Far-fetched as soon of these scenes seem, they are based on fact! I read an account the other day about a passenger who broke down a door to try and rescue a woman who was trapped in her cabin, and a steward yelled at him for damaging White Star Property. 😅 And people were sadly crushed by that falling funnel. What a way to go.
It's the most historically accurate version when it comes to survivor accounts and several people who were on the real Titanic assisted with the production
The first one is based on a book, a book that was based off the recollections of memories of those who survived. The second is based on the same historical events. It’s not a copy of the movie, they are showing what really happened, in both.
Believe it or not i like the sinking in a night to remember more except the fact all the funnels didn’t collapse and she didn’t break apart but they didn’t believe she broke in half at the time
Well, in 1958, to construct a ship and have it split in half would require far more work at a fraction of the cost than the CGI used in the Titanic. Hence, A Night to Remember was more limited in the scope of what they could have portrayed.. A night to remember is the better movie.
I actually prefer A Night to Remember. It may not be as accurate as it might have been, but I love how it has more of a focus on the crew, passengers, and most of the well known survivors as apposed to a romantic love story focused on two fictional characters. It feels a lot more horrific to me, and having it be in black and white with all the creepy cheap sound effects of the sinking just felt more authentic
@@smarkmalark A Night to Remember is one of the most definitive accounts of the disaster. It is by far the better of the two films in my opinion. When the film was made in 1958 it was not known then that the ship spilt in two.
@@smarkmalark totally agree!! I actually thought the sound effects of the ship creaking was so eerie and well done in the old one. You barely heard it in the newer one.
Why? Titanic is literally more focused on two people that didn’t exist, they were the main attraction! Yes a night to remember had Kenneth more as the main attraction but at least they didn’t focus on him all the time!
That's not scenes from Titanic, that was inspired by the night to remember, that's real life events that were in both Titanic movies. People tend to forget that this is a real life tragedy, not a hollywood movie.
A Night to Remember had more engaging performances from all the actors , while James Cameron paid attention to detail, the actors gave band 1 dimensional performances,example Molly Brown, the Captain, etc, also not one mention of the Californian, only to give more screen time to Jack n Rose.
well, because they did not know, and those who survived did not understand or see (because night was dark) what happened to the ship or were too traumatized to remember or tell
@@Tevi_L7151Several survivors testified that they saw or heard or saw and heard the ship break in half. It’s just that the senators gave more weight to Second Officer Lightoller and Third Officer Pitman who both testified they didn’t see or hear a breakup. Of course Pitman was several hundred yards away at the time, and Lightoller was underwater for part of the breakup, but as officers, their word did hold more water.
Loved night to remember. Great movie. Probably better than James Cameron Titanic. Except the Titanic going down in 1. 1 thing that I feel like James Cameron did better was intense of the movie.. the sailors acted desperate to turn away from the iceberg than a night to remember. In that movie they acted in a way like it's a casual day at the office. 😂
I love Mr Andrew’s character, he had so much empathy and wasn’t all stuck up like a lot of the rest of those wealthy ppl
I also love the father-daughter thing he had with rose
Andrew's isn't just a character, he was a real person.
He was a notoriously humble man who had humble beginnings and didn't forget his roots.
One of the few wealthy people who weren't portrayed as villans in the movie. In the real even many 1st class passengers helped others into the lifeboats, some even sacrificing themselves in the process.
But oh well, nothing like rich man James Cameron complaining about the rich 😂
@@xraystudios3693Im sure everyone had to make some sacrifice for others that night no matter what class. So tragic
@@jeanandre6998 you don't get it, many 1st class passenger went out of their way to help more passengers into lifeboats, even sacrificing their own seat on one
That "Shut Up" was personal 💀💀
Very personal💀💀
“SHUT UP!”
-Jack Dawson
Btw why does the person’s voice looks almost similar to the ones from a night to remember
The musicians -- how they stayed there playing till the end, to help calm everyone during a tagic time, caring more about the others than their own safety -- now that was heroism right there! RIP ❤
Man I need to watch these movies again.
A Night To Remember is now on CZcams Video for Free with Ads.
@@QuiGonJinn1993 Thanks
James Cameron's Titanic is on Netflix. Not sure how long it'll be on there but just wanted to point that out.
What region? I'm in the UK
I never have realized how much inspiration James Cameron got from a night to remember.
The Night to Remember movie was based on the book by Walter Lord. He had interview numerous Titanic survivors.
"inspiration"
@@giuliac9735yeah?
Yes I thought that too.
More like copying exact lines or scenes.
"That's White Star Line Property!"
"SHUT! UP!"
Epic.
actually happened too i believe. some people broke a gate or door and were threatened with punishment by a crewman "once the ship returned to southampton"...🤣
And thats why the 97's is better
@@creamcat69no
@@Adam48374 ok
@@creamcat69 to be honest back then was worst
Thomas Andrew’s prob got the best portrayal because eye whiteness accounts spoke very highly of him and how he risked everything to try to save as many as possible
But after the ship hit the iceberg, not much was shown of him in the 1997 film.
I read that book and watched that movie before Cameron’s. I always thought that’s how the ship went down. I think everyone thought it just went down on a slope (diagonally). Cameron showed the reality which was far worse for the people on the ship.
Yeah but with Cameron his idea of the ship going down in half was just a Theory as he said but in the 58 version they interviewed most of the Titanic survivors and eye witnessed however most did say that they didn't see the ship as it was so dark out no one can tell and there was no moonlight or nothing with James he only interviewed the children that survived by there parents that got them off the ship now I think 1 or 2 of them were only infants at the time all they got to say was what there parents told them which still doesn't give a whole clearer picture but whose to know if ots the truth or untruth maybe mere excaduration. (Sorry).
They didn’t know for sure that it broke in half until 1985.
@@QuiGonJinn1993there are ways to figure out that it broke in half besides whether there survivors saw it happen (because it was a black moonless night so they wouldn’t have seen it). They just wouldn’t have known until they wreck was found, now that it’s been found it’s clear what happened based on a number of factors including the boat being in two pieces a half mile apart on the ocean floor, the clean break, and the fact that only the stern imploded.
@@QuiGonJinn1993the survivors all said the ship broke in half nobody believed them and thought they may just be talking from a place of trauma but then they realized it was true when it was found in the 80’s
@@BoringTroublemakerthe survivors said it broke in half so some had to have seen it. Initially nobody believed them
I just watched "A Night to Remember." It's brilliant and available for free on CZcams.
Whoa.
Thanks.
Actually Mr. Guggenheims' one liner is based on fact, he truly said this.
I’m also amazed that both actors for him and his servan look the sam too
How did I have no idea that there was a titanic movie in 1958 I love old movies…must go watch right now I have two hours until I have to be back to work!!
Far-fetched as soon of these scenes seem, they are based on fact! I read an account the other day about a passenger who broke down a door to try and rescue a woman who was trapped in her cabin, and a steward yelled at him for damaging White Star Property. 😅 And people were sadly crushed by that falling funnel. What a way to go.
The 1958 film is much more charming and genuine.
Yes
Titanic (1997) in my opinion had excellent scenes, but A Night To Remember (1958) was the better movie overall.
Yes
i get chills watching these
They aren't copied they actually happened in real.
Yeah because Jack and Rose actually existed and said "Shut Up"
Well, some of these scenes aren’t directly inspired by the 1958 film because the actually happened in the real disaster.
I didn’t even know that a 1958 version existed
It's the most historically accurate version when it comes to survivor accounts and several people who were on the real Titanic assisted with the production
The first one is based on a book, a book that was based off the recollections of memories of those who survived.
The second is based on the same historical events. It’s not a copy of the movie, they are showing what really happened, in both.
They were directly experienced by the survivors of the Titanic.. Hence, both the movies portrayed them
i love the 97 but 58 focused more on the titanic, californian, and the carpathia then a love story
Always be ready. You never know when you will have to fight for your life.
Believe it or not i like the sinking in a night to remember more except the fact all the funnels didn’t collapse and she didn’t break apart but they didn’t believe she broke in half at the time
There's also the technology gap.
@@nonyabusiness4151 what?
Well, in 1958, to construct a ship and have it split in half would require far more work at a fraction of the cost than the CGI used in the Titanic.
Hence, A Night to Remember was more limited in the scope of what they could have portrayed..
A night to remember is the better movie.
a night to remember is very histroically accurate
Yes except for the sinking 😂
Mr Andrews was a real g
the actor for Andrews is one of my favorite actors
he appears in many different movies
Most of these were inspired by real life, not by A Night To Remeber
Fabrizio was my favorite I wish he didn’t die in the movie
kate saying "mr. andrews" just itches my brain a certain way oml
We need to settle something is the first or second Titanic better?
Me: Second
I actually prefer A Night to Remember. It may not be as accurate as it might have been, but I love how it has more of a focus on the crew, passengers, and most of the well known survivors as apposed to a romantic love story focused on two fictional characters. It feels a lot more horrific to me, and having it be in black and white with all the creepy cheap sound effects of the sinking just felt more authentic
@@smarkmalark A Night to Remember is one of the most definitive accounts of the disaster. It is by far the better of the two films in my opinion. When the film was made in 1958 it was not known then that the ship spilt in two.
@@smarkmalark totally agree!! I actually thought the sound effects of the ship creaking was so eerie and well done in the old one. You barely heard it in the newer one.
The first
The second Titanic is better than the 1953 Titanic, but A Night to Remember is better than both story wise.
Titanic tells a better fictitious story but Night To Remember seems to be a more accurate acount of the sinking aside from the breakup of the ship.
team: both❤
You forgot the 45 degrees shot, it is technically a reference
watch both of these movies
It's not based on the older movie, but both are based on facts from survivors accounts from that night.
It was based on the older movie I mean not all of them but most of them
They weren't just "scenes" taken from first Titanic. They were true stories taken from the real event
true
Titanic 1997 is a masterpiece... A night to remember is also good but titanic is much better than a night to remember.. Just my opinion...
Why? Titanic is literally more focused on two people that didn’t exist, they were the main attraction! Yes a night to remember had Kenneth more as the main attraction but at least they didn’t focus on him all the time!
I think A Night To Remember is the better movie. It focuses more on the characters and the accuracy behind the sinking
I never quite understood that picture of Rose and Jack... Is her back towards us or her chest towards us??
nah why u do this?
Chest. He’s hugging her from behind
That's not scenes from Titanic, that was inspired by the night to remember, that's real life events that were in both Titanic movies. People tend to forget that this is a real life tragedy, not a hollywood movie.
You mean "scenes from Titanic(1997) and A Night to remember(1958) that are directly on the real events of 1912."
Rotten tomatoes:
A night to remember: critics 100% audience 90%
Titanic: critics 88% audience 69%
You forgot about the captain going down with the ship, some say its canon but its unknown what really happened to him.
Titanic 1997 Vs . Titanic A Night To Remember .
Isn't it just the case that these scenes happened in real life, and that's why they are shown in both films?
Hey, could you mabye do a video about Jay Yates? Of course only if you have enough information.
Even with the historical inaccuracies i.e. the ship not breaking apart, A Night To Remember is still the better film.
A night to remember ls better imo
Same
A night to remember was way better then Cameron's cause it focused more on the ship then that awful love story.
Is there a part 2?
The overturned boat scene is almost identical
I love Titanic (1997)
What about that book the Titan that was written in 1890s or 1980s, what a coincidence
I saw that movie it’s very good
Where's part 2?
The funnel one is just history, told by the survivors, not inspired by an movie.
I am going to the Titanic museum
These are both very accurate reinactments of how the Americans and the English would like to think happened.
Okay but doesn’t Mr. Andrews from ANTR look like a non bearded Lincoln?
“Put it on child”
You would an hour long video to cover all the blatantly copied scenes
"blatantly copied" as if it wasnt based on actual things real people said lol, they're both based on the same thing
@@JustinK0 and yet there are many shots that have been reused straight up.
James Cameron isn't exactly secretive about this
@@Yetaxa thats my point.. because both movies are based on an actual events,
The most of the film is like the book
Wow 😮
A night to remember is the best
What a time saver to just copy scenes and dialogue from another source!
A NIGHT TO REWMEMBER IS JUST TITANIC WITHOUT THE LOVE STORY
But more accurate
Titanic 1958 more accurate.
In second scene white guy same voice maybe brother or something
in my eyes, A night to remember is better, except for the fact that in "a night to remember" the ship sinks in one piece.
A Night to Remember had more engaging performances from all the actors , while James Cameron paid attention to detail, the actors gave band 1 dimensional performances,example Molly Brown, the Captain, etc, also not one mention of the Californian, only to give more screen time to Jack n Rose.
1958 didn't show titanic spliting in 2
well, because they did not know, and those who survived did not understand or see (because night was dark) what happened to the ship or were too traumatized to remember or tell
@@Tevi_L7151 the titanic was found in 1985, then titanic(1997) has more accuracy
@@Tevi_L7151Several survivors testified that they saw or heard or saw and heard the ship break in half. It’s just that the senators gave more weight to Second Officer Lightoller and Third Officer Pitman who both testified they didn’t see or hear a breakup. Of course Pitman was several hundred yards away at the time, and Lightoller was underwater for part of the breakup, but as officers, their word did hold more water.
Those mesh gates being locked was accurate, but. I remember them.
Vamos que james Cameron copio toda la película. Que no se comió el coco vamos.
I can't say he copied it both films have something different to them
Inspired? Or a direct copy? 😅
Many of these scenes are based on facts
I like 1997
Oo there was a older one
There are older
james cameron may truly be borrowing a bit...
WOOW....🙄🙄🙄
Wondering what Mrs. Guggenheim reaction when she found out her husband was sailing with his mistress Madame Aubert 🤔
No way they photoshopped her a jawline in the poster
The '58 version was better.
but the Oscars and Billions went to......
Loved night to remember. Great movie. Probably better than James Cameron Titanic. Except the Titanic going down in 1. 1 thing that I feel like James Cameron did better was intense of the movie.. the sailors acted desperate to turn away from the iceberg than a night to remember. In that movie they acted in a way like it's a casual day at the office. 😂
There are more rip-offs too.
58 was better
.
He ripped off the whole movie huh
Night to remember was a more. Accurate than 1997 version
I think its a Remake
we know....stop fishing for likes
Inspired?!, Stolen!