That's naive. Taxes don't matter. Government spending is based on debt. The push for women to have income is a way to drive down wages by flooding the market with workers which benefits corporations. It also drives up more debt taking by increasing student loans and rent which benefits the banks. Everything pushed benefits the parasitic elites.
@@dragosdragon7515 Corporations are in the pocket of Dems so it doesn't make sense that population growth is a priority of theirs, when overpopulation prevention and abortion are keystones of the Dem platform
"Men always seem to want credit for doing what they're supposed to do. A man says, "I ain't ever been to jail." Brother, you ain't SUPPOSED to be ever been to jail. What do you want? A cookie?" - Chris Rock This applys to women as well. You've just done what you're supposed to do. You want an eclair?
â@@shadowl1980she said and still with their father that means her husband is their father. Why do all the feminist here love to insult us stay at home moms your literally proving the guy in the video right. Maybe stop projecting your bad partner choices on us . We choose good men that's why we are stay at home moms and not bitter old cat ladies like you.
@@PumpdaBrakes-ub8kp Loose women filled with all manner of false doctrine, who are easily manipulated and swallowers of slogans have vilified it, because they foolishly destroyed themselves and could never have it after that. Misery loves company.
People cringe nowadays if men are ahead of the household... hate being friends with that "my wife's gonna kill me" guy sucks to be you no one is in charge of me at my house!!! Especially if I pay all the bills
I live in Norway. My cousin married at age 25 and had 2 children. She stayed at home and raised them and they are now both successful young adults. When her children became older teens she decided she wanted to pursue a career in journalism. That was ten years ago; now she the executive leader of a major newspaper in Norway.
Of course it's orchestrated. The government was able to drastically increase it's tax base when women went to work. It's also made it so the family is not the central role model for a child, the government is. It's created a sense that the government will do everything not the basic building blocks of society: families.
@@bdoopy4167 I'm not telling people that they have to accept a lifestyle. What I AM saying is that this lifestyle that is pushed IS orchestrated to destroy the underpinning of Western society. You can't "fundamentally transform America" without destroying it first. They're being USED.
Tax base is still there regardless and you forget they now print what they need. The real push is from corporations wanting more supply which makes for cheaper labor.
I had to look this word up đ€·ââïž âAntinatalism or anti-Natalismâ is a philosophical stance and social movement that gives a negative value to starting life. It is a family of views that are critical of reproduction and it considers coming into existence as bad or immoral.
The arrogance of a woman to believe she is more important or can contribute/accomplish more than the 5+ loving, healthy, amazing people she could have raised.
We fight against spiritual beings and principalities in the heavenly places. This is a fight older than mankind, and we need to start fighting back against the dark ones.
@@richardteale8203 Oh! Well, you obviously have evidence of some shadowy, secret group of puppet masters pulling the strings behind the curtains to accomplish their nefarious agenda. Go ahead and present your bulletproof evidence. I'm all ears.
@@richardteale8203 Oh! Well, you obviously have evidence of some shadowy, secret group of puppet masters pulling the strings behind the curtains to accomplish their nefarious plot. Go ahead and present this evidence. I'm on the edge of my seat.
@@richardteale8203 You obviously have evidence of some shadowy, secret group behind this nefarious agenda that I'm not familiar with. Please... do share with the group.
@MeneerHerculePoirot i don't know. I don't want a boring trad wife. I want a partner who does shit with me. Debate, party, orgies, game. Wants dogs over kids. Roadtrips, camping. A woman who can get her hands dirty and someone who knows how to change a tire if I'm not around. What am I saying? I already have that. I'm good. These guys on these videos just seem to want breeding machines and maids. Not a wife.
Speaking as a fairly conservative man, while I do believe education + career and motherhood are often falsely dichotomized by the left, I think his argument suffers from the same fallacy and misses an important point: the children of well-educated mothers will in turn (likely) be better educated. My wife is a professor at a conservative Christian college. She earned her first doctorate before we started dating and her second shortly after our first child was born. We have no student loan debt-we paid off the remainder of our student loans in our first year of marriage around the time we bought our house. She does ultimately desire to scale back her workload in a couple years to homeschool our children when our oldest reaches preschool age as 1) she wants to homeschool our children and 2) my salary is sufficient to pay our bills. Our marriage greatly benefits from the educations we _both_ received. Frankly speaking, her intellect and thirst for knowledge are among the traits I find most attractive in her. Had she not gone to college, we never would have met in the first place (we met at the conservative Christian college we both attended as undergraduates). Not all colleges and universities are fundamentally liberal. The life of the mind ought to be cultivated in both men and women where it can-I honestly find unintelligent women unattractive-certainly not marriage material. An intelligent person without a well-rounded education is an uncut gem. Is the devaluing of child-bearing by the left deeply problematic and short-sighted? Yes. Will all people benefit from a college education? No. But many will and their children will be better for it. Care must simply be taken in selecting the institution.
I had a girlfriend who passed me up for a PhD. We were so suited and had plans this year to do all these things together. She even sent me a Christmas gift with amazing chocolates and a bucket list. And then sometime later broke up with me, because she wanted to do her PhD. I told her, i habe several femape friends who while married were still doing their PhDs. If we fogured it out, we can make it work. Sad part was, we had genuinely fallen in love to the point where i was figuring out our future ppans together. But maybe that was my problem. I will be honest, her breaking up with me came as a complete shock and surprise. I cant say, i saw it coming. Anyways, i dont hate her for it. How can i? I loved her so much. How can i suddenly hate her. It is her life and her decision. It just broke my heart so much. We had so much going for us. I am 33, she is 23. And it didnt matter in the slightest. When we were together nothi g else mattered. And i know she felt the same because scarely would an hour go by where she wasnt contacting me, telling me how much she loved what i had told her, how it had been amazing just chatting and when we could nexg meet up in person. I still miss her. Anyways, i believe families are less desirable realities for people because work careers are becoming too easy options.
As you said you have colleagues who are married, have kids and able to complete their phD. All indivial choice, some have support systems or ok with juggling family life and career... others just want to do one or the other. Which is perfectly ok either way. Perhaps it's the age difference. Or she just doesn't want to be weighted down by marital responsibility and expectations. As they say "if you love someone you should let them go and if it was meant to be they will come back". Sounds like your ex is happy with just the milk and not the whole cow/bull, and keeping it casual.
My Ex-wifeâs life: She studied pedagogics and became a teacher. She married her first husband and had 8 children. When all of them were in school she started working as a teacher again. She took up a study of psychotherapy on weekends. She quit school service and had her own practice as a psychotherapist. Meanwhile she is retired. Life is long! You can do so many things.
If it wasnât orchestrated you would have to be at the peak of your accomplishments as a man in your early twenties. Give thanks for the buffer zones. The biggest enemy in all of order is the transiency of our society which we must overcome and adapt to. The leadership had to find a way to hold everyone up and ensure everyoneâs right to trial and error while the whole world gets more connected with all new unidentified members and new tricks
my opinion aside, here oin the UK, women over 40 having healthy babies is almost double that of women in their 20's, this means that fertility is not an issue, so should not be used as an argument. However, having babies older is not good. I am 48, I cannot imagine raising a baby now, I'm too old for that sh!t.... We ARE meant to have babies young. Mother nature will give a young mother her figure back almost immediately and all the energy she needs
The more people working (men and women), the greater the tax revenue and consumer spending. This however, comes at the expense of a moral and balanced societyâŠ
I can relate to the whole discontent with the bs being pushed on modern TV. People are having to move to watching anime to get some form of a strong and well written male character of significance. They are also plaguing video games with the whole SIMP male characters and woke boss babe strong characters who if you put the traits they have onto men, the men will be labeled as "evil and toxic".
It's all about money. Social media saw one house and only saw Men making money. So they said to themselves How Do We Get More Money Out of People. Let's Tell Women They Can Go Out There And Make Money Also. That's when the Nuclear Family ended.
Sadly, it requires TWO incomes to get by for most people now...let alone purchase a home...and yes men are on the short-end of the stick in terms of graduation, social mobility, and financial security on top of all the mental health issues and more. So, do we as men want to disincentivize our partners from higher education or are we capable of equitably sharing our responsibilities in the workplace and at home? Because the single, sole-provider family isn't coming back...the market and autonomy of women will not allow it. It forces women to change as well in their evaluation of partners...what does this man bring to the table that isn't solely financial security? Regardless, I want my daughter to exceed in this regard...to go through higher education and use her reasoning to discern who may be a healthy, reliable partner.
And this makes unbridled immigration necessary, which destroys the culture. But I wonder why this seems to happen all over the world. Even insular countries like Japan are going the same way.
I completely agree with your facts woman shouldnât try to do the same things as men bc their not the same , as an asexual woman I wonât have a husband or children and I am infertile what do I do?
Wait wait, women should be able to get an education. Why it is so expensive in America is another debate. We're mixing up topics here. But I agree, the situation indeed makes family life (unnecessarily?) harder.
It's expensive because gov gives out loans instead people paying it for themselves. This allows the businesses that act as universities and colleges to constantly raise their prices.
If women getting out in the world and growing up and gaining experience before they settle down is "anti-natalism" then yeah, sure. But it isn't, thats just being a functioning human being.
How did "gaining experience" turn into promiscuity and growing up turn into going into massive debt? You can have a family, have a life, and grow together with your husband. Taking on responsibility is the epitome of growing up. Being a degenerate is just extending your teenage to late adulthood.
@edheldude Well because when you're young you tend to date around as a means of figuring out what you want in a partner and that often means having sex with multiple partners. I don't think it "turned into" that, thats how young people have been since forever. As for the debt, if that's in the form of student loans, then that's just an unfortunate reality. It would be good to have free education but that's just not the way things are right now. I agreez you could get married when you're in you're early 20s and some people do and that's fine, but by and large, young people tend to explore the world and them selves before settling down, it just happens to be that they're settling down later than they used to.
Homer and Peter are both dumbasses and laughing stocks as fathers and leaders of the family. Also these two shows are very much left leaning and woke nowadays
As an OB Nurse I can tell you that fertility is based of pure genetics. Ive seen women in their early 20s having a hard time getting pregnant while the ladies in their late 30s conceive so easily. Women back in the day had alot of kids and would still conceive in their 40s. And yes education for women is important. Having a good job so they can have retire and receive money is important. Ive seen elderly ladies who only receive a small amount retirement money from what their husbands worked. Which is like 500 monthly. It sucks.
Agree on the shows being âwokeâ these days which is funny cause when I was a kid there were so many strong female leads and now the new ones seem weak or dumb in comparison. On the other side of the video do what you want itâs a free county. Granted Iâve never been pro college only reason I agreed to go was > me- âhey family since you endlessly push college Iâll go but only if you pay for itâ family-âof course we willâ now im 20000$ in debt for a degree I didnât even need they want to wait on Bidens forgiveness shit where grandmama died moneys in a trust for me and I canât touch it even though itâs enough to pay for it and Iâd kill myself before putting money into it since itâs not what was agreed in the first place
Telling woman that they dont just have to choose one lifstlye isnt anti family its just saying you dont have to if you dont want to and heres these other alternatives i dont really understand this obsession with how others run there romantic relationships because the truth is your opinion of someone elses relationship doesn't matter if in that relationship it is consensual and both are happy with how its being run because at the end of the day you dont get to decide what makes others happy and not happy im starting to think its just that people just want to control others and cant accept that there way of life doesnt work for everyone so they dream of being a tyrant
@@bdoopy4167 I saw how miserable so many women are having to get up and go to work every day I was smart enough not to make that mistake but so many felk for for it. But yeah I am seeing more and more women realize they were lied to so that's a good thing. I'm not talking about women that have a real passion to fly a plane or become a fashion designer or whatever that's obviously different. But most women are just working to pay their bills and get by . I love being a stay at home mom, and I don't know any that don't . Everyday I feel loved , safe and pretty . If you could find a good loving husband that would make that possible for you I think most women now days are wishing they had that privilege. Because it is a privilege that I wouldn't trade for anything.
@@Luciana_McC_99 exactly just like I said do what works for you as you said there are woman who enjoy there career and woman who like being stay at home mom's
@@bdoopy4167 you don't understand or do and just don't want to admit the government and everyone else isn't just giving people a choice they spend billions of dollars to force most people into not being able to choose anything else but what they want everyone to be a wage slave. many women are not working right now because it's their choice but it's not possible for them to do anything else. Also go to any stay at home moms videos of her just talking about how happy she is and see all the angry feminist comments saying the most ugly things to these women just because they are happy. also how old are you sister ? Because either you never had to work as a woman or your just not being honest if your going to pretend you have no idea what I'm talking about.
Giving women a choice to do whatever they want to do⊠anti natalism⊠Iâm sure there is a great solution you advocate for this âproblemâ that is not a bad look at allâŠ
Same group of people ask what's stopping women from being ceo or getting top job... then throw remarks like this... trying to argue against higher education for women. Because popping out 8-13kids is much better for a nation and humanity... and men and women's mental health. This also vilifies and take no account of women who have fertility difficulties even from birth... and pushes early motherhood... he does know teenage pregnancy is high in US? What kind of culture and movement is he trying to promote?? Or timeloop back to?
This but never mention mortality of women giving birth and with each pregnancy risk is higher... Feminist is too blame... self-centric lifestyle in modern society especially western family values... used to be a village raising a child... now it's just their parents. So no wonder why younger generation steer away from having kids in this modern world. Plus once they do have kids they want to provide the world for the few that they have... Unlike pass generations where they have kids and then work out how to provide for them later... and if they can't they just have more... but that would be a bias generalisation just to drive a bias point... just like all these youtuber podcast wanna be who have extreme opinions for a living to attract views to make $$. When you are a good enough debater/communicator, you can rationalise any idiocy. Especially with tunnel vision and blinders on.
How did you get that from what he said? He said nothing of sorts. You've been pre-programmed to have emotional reactions to certain topics and that's what he was talking about re: family.
@edheldude not from just this clip. Others too. Everything these red pill podcasts say is about how women should basically be breeding machines and be slaves to husbands. Always submit to the husband. They also only want 19 or 20 years olds so they're definitely groomers and pedophiles. Instead of findinf women who share their views, they want to control every woman.
Biologically yes. However does a 19yo have the mental and emotional acuity to be a good mother? This acuity begins with the selection of a good father.
At what age do you think person have mental and emotional acuity for selection of a good partner? at the every age the criteria of idea/definition/longing-of ideal partner changes, isn't it? Thought I do fully support that women should study to their best capacity but I also believe women can raise a family with values and keep family to gather even in hardest time. Society has and even now only value job that earns money and feel it has major contribution to this. If the society (especially men) acknowledge and recognize the importance of home-maker role, you would find many more happy healthy joint families and many social nuisance, crime would drop.
All you have to do is look how society is and if that's not proof enough then you are blind. The age between 19-25 is the time to have a family but all you see is the glorification of a single mom with no strong father figure.
@@anupshah9779 homemaker is undervalued. Perhaps it is associated with gold digger. In an average house, with modern appliances and school age kids, what does a homemaker do? From experience I can say family of 4 , 3 bedroom, 4 bathroom, all housework done by Tuesday. Then what?
I must disagree with him. There are too many teenage girls having children and that's not right. You should be at least 21 years old to be allowed to have children, because children must be raised in well-structured families and it needs money.
Non sense. People can do baby later. Gvt needs a 2+ kids per woman, to make it in the future. So, nobody, absolutely nobody wants to prevent a family creation. We don't need to make a family early in life, because our children will survive age 5 much more than in the past. A time where this man is stuck.
@@swordoftruth7862 Tell me more Mr Science of Biology? The lack of birth is common to all developed countries. It's a problem, not a goal. Stop being paranoiac about gouvernement.
Yet right now over half of women in their 30s in England are single and childless. You can look at any statistics about birth rates etc. and see the destructive results of what Andrew was just pointing out.
Listen if they make it a choice I would have no problem. But the thing is they say: "men are dumb and useless" / "we don't need men" / "cheat and sleep with thousand of men. You go queen" etc. When you push such radical ideas its a problem...its not a choice its brainwash! If it was: "To be a mom is very beautiful and men are not useless. You can choose anything you want just have the pros and cons in mind before you make the choice" I would have no problem with it.
And many are choosing horribly and he's trying to help them, so they aren't miserable when they are older, because they chose horribly when they were younger.
â@goitidanielaser2167 đđđ§đĄđđź đŠđȘđđŁđŁ: yeah that is sort of true that there are some of us that do propagate that but we also have the treatment like the same because the entire retro movement is just how to get the best type of woman seeing them as more of property than of people so we should have the choice of if we want to even date a man or not having a kid in a young age doesn't make you beautiful
â@christopherreeves5592 đđđ§đĄđđź đŠđȘđđŁđŁ: Didn't he say that women can't drive? And andrew tape reminds me of Mister j and he was a piece of shit towards me and I see the same clause in this bald egg of a man I feel like some people just defend anything he does. He even said he moved to the country he got arrested in because he liked the rape laws. At some point it goes beyond trolling, and most trolling is terrible behavior anyways
@@HarlEyQuiNN80085 Funny I cant see my comment. YT wont allow me to see it lol. I wonder if its not intentional. Anyhow I don't quite understand what u meant with the comment but I can say it is a mistake to wait till 30+ to have a child. Women are fertile while young. The older you get the lower the eggs are and the higher chances of making a sick baby(for example Down Syndrome). Not to mention you will be "uglier". Brainwashing women that a career is more important than a family is criminal. Sure some women cant have children or don't want any but those that want a baby are brainwashed to do it later(when its high risk or too late)
Hes right all the shows show the kids doing whatever they want parents fighting and dad sleeping on the couch. AND THEN, REWARDING THEM FOR IT.
Married with children was the worst ha ha
Does the govt get more tax money when women have their own income? Yes? There ya go
True, but it's more of a corporate push for a larger supply of cheaper labor.
They literaly just print hte money with zero care
money is NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The cause at those levels
That's naive. Taxes don't matter. Government spending is based on debt. The push for women to have income is a way to drive down wages by flooding the market with workers which benefits corporations. It also drives up more debt taking by increasing student loans and rent which benefits the banks. Everything pushed benefits the parasitic elites.
It's more of a corporate push population growth props government long term
@@dragosdragon7515 Corporations are in the pocket of Dems so it doesn't make sense that population growth is a priority of theirs, when overpopulation prevention and abortion are keystones of the Dem platform
Had my babies at 18,19 and 27 still with their father and have been for 10 years the best thing I ever did still to this day đ
"Men always seem to want credit for doing what they're supposed to do. A man says, "I ain't ever been to jail." Brother, you ain't SUPPOSED to be ever been to jail. What do you want? A cookie?" - Chris Rock
This applys to women as well. You've just done what you're supposed to do. You want an eclair?
Damn if you do damn if you don't with this lot isn't that right?
Have you heard of the case of Lauren Southern?
So you had your kids before getting married, probably not with your current husband.
â@@shadowl1980she said and still with their father that means her husband is their father. Why do all the feminist here love to insult us stay at home moms your literally proving the guy in the video right. Maybe stop projecting your bad partner choices on us . We choose good men that's why we are stay at home moms and not bitter old cat ladies like you.
They've vilified stay-at-home moms for decades.
women have villified it.
@@PumpdaBrakes-ub8kp Loose women filled with all manner of false doctrine, who are easily manipulated and swallowers of slogans have vilified it, because they foolishly destroyed themselves and could never have it after that. Misery loves company.
People cringe nowadays if men are ahead of the household... hate being friends with that "my wife's gonna kill me" guy sucks to be you no one is in charge of me at my house!!! Especially if I pay all the bills
"Ahead of the household?" As opposed to behind the household? đ
@@seekeroftruth6728 good catch đ
But we know what our illiterate acquaintance was trying to say
@@dragosdragon7515illiterate is wild lol. đ
About fucking time someone says something about this shit
I live in Norway. My cousin married at age 25 and had 2 children. She stayed at home and raised them and they are now both successful young adults. When her children became older teens she decided she wanted to pursue a career in journalism. That was ten years ago; now she the executive leader of a major newspaper in Norway.
Of course it's orchestrated. The government was able to drastically increase it's tax base when women went to work. It's also made it so the family is not the central role model for a child, the government is. It's created a sense that the government will do everything not the basic building blocks of society: families.
Telling woman that they have other choices isn't bad sorry you just can't accept that your life style will never work for everyone
@@bdoopy4167 I'm not telling people that they have to accept a lifestyle. What I AM saying is that this lifestyle that is pushed IS orchestrated to destroy the underpinning of Western society. You can't "fundamentally transform America" without destroying it first. They're being USED.
Tax base is still there regardless and you forget they now print what they need. The real push is from corporations wanting more supply which makes for cheaper labor.
@@bdoopy4167 except they arenât held to the same standard. Affirmative action, allowed to vote without draft, etcâŠdumba55
And now all the youth are communists
I had to look this word up đ€·ââïž
âAntinatalism or anti-Natalismâ is a philosophical stance and social movement that gives a negative value to starting life. It is a family of views that are critical of reproduction and it considers coming into existence as bad or immoral.
Finally someone who speaks the truth.
women won't listen to him
He's certainly not wrong.
The arrogance of a woman to believe she is more important or can contribute/accomplish more than the 5+ loving, healthy, amazing people she could have raised.
We fight against spiritual beings and principalities in the heavenly places. This is a fight older than mankind, and we need to start fighting back against the dark ones.
The first attack by the enemy was against women. Why would today be any different?
Do we think she's listening & learning?đ€ Unlikely!
I would hope that she's not taking his conspiracy theories seriously.
@@seekeroftruth6728 Surely your being sarcastic? If not, you're delusional!
@@richardteale8203 Oh! Well, you obviously have evidence of some shadowy, secret group of puppet masters pulling the strings behind the curtains to accomplish their nefarious agenda. Go ahead and present your bulletproof evidence. I'm all ears.
@@richardteale8203 Oh! Well, you obviously have evidence of some shadowy, secret group of puppet masters pulling the strings behind the curtains to accomplish their nefarious plot. Go ahead and present this evidence. I'm on the edge of my seat.
@@richardteale8203 You obviously have evidence of some shadowy, secret group behind this nefarious agenda that I'm not familiar with. Please... do share with the group.
Al Bundy. Now he was a role model
This is what Iâm telling people, including the doctor that I was a classmate with
Is shes capable of learning and interested in continuing education we must provide them with that đ
Could she just be any more basic... with this disturbing attitude...
What's disturbing about it?
â@@walkingcontradictiongarype4290
If one has to even ask that question one is pretty much beyong hope.
@MeneerHerculePoirot i don't know. I don't want a boring trad wife.
I want a partner who does shit with me.
Debate, party, orgies, game.
Wants dogs over kids.
Roadtrips, camping.
A woman who can get her hands dirty and someone who knows how to change a tire if I'm not around.
What am I saying?
I already have that.
I'm good.
These guys on these videos just seem to want breeding machines and maids.
Not a wife.
Been saying this for over a decade.
Speaking as a fairly conservative man, while I do believe education + career and motherhood are often falsely dichotomized by the left, I think his argument suffers from the same fallacy and misses an important point: the children of well-educated mothers will in turn (likely) be better educated.
My wife is a professor at a conservative Christian college. She earned her first doctorate before we started dating and her second shortly after our first child was born. We have no student loan debt-we paid off the remainder of our student loans in our first year of marriage around the time we bought our house. She does ultimately desire to scale back her workload in a couple years to homeschool our children when our oldest reaches preschool age as 1) she wants to homeschool our children and 2) my salary is sufficient to pay our bills.
Our marriage greatly benefits from the educations we _both_ received. Frankly speaking, her intellect and thirst for knowledge are among the traits I find most attractive in her. Had she not gone to college, we never would have met in the first place (we met at the conservative Christian college we both attended as undergraduates).
Not all colleges and universities are fundamentally liberal. The life of the mind ought to be cultivated in both men and women where it can-I honestly find unintelligent women unattractive-certainly not marriage material. An intelligent person without a well-rounded education is an uncut gem. Is the devaluing of child-bearing by the left deeply problematic and short-sighted? Yes. Will all people benefit from a college education? No. But many will and their children will be better for it. Care must simply be taken in selecting the institution.
I had a girlfriend who passed me up for a PhD. We were so suited and had plans this year to do all these things together. She even sent me a Christmas gift with amazing chocolates and a bucket list.
And then sometime later broke up with me, because she wanted to do her PhD. I told her, i habe several femape friends who while married were still doing their PhDs. If we fogured it out, we can make it work.
Sad part was, we had genuinely fallen in love to the point where i was figuring out our future ppans together. But maybe that was my problem.
I will be honest, her breaking up with me came as a complete shock and surprise. I cant say, i saw it coming.
Anyways, i dont hate her for it. How can i? I loved her so much. How can i suddenly hate her. It is her life and her decision. It just broke my heart so much. We had so much going for us. I am 33, she is 23. And it didnt matter in the slightest. When we were together nothi g else mattered. And i know she felt the same because scarely would an hour go by where she wasnt contacting me, telling me how much she loved what i had told her, how it had been amazing just chatting and when we could nexg meet up in person. I still miss her. Anyways, i believe families are less desirable realities for people because work careers are becoming too easy options.
As you said you have colleagues who are married, have kids and able to complete their phD. All indivial choice, some have support systems or ok with juggling family life and career... others just want to do one or the other. Which is perfectly ok either way.
Perhaps it's the age difference. Or she just doesn't want to be weighted down by marital responsibility and expectations. As they say "if you love someone you should let them go and if it was meant to be they will come back".
Sounds like your ex is happy with just the milk and not the whole cow/bull, and keeping it casual.
My Ex-wifeâs life: She studied pedagogics and became a teacher. She married her first husband and had 8 children. When all of them were in school she started working as a teacher again. She took up a study of psychotherapy on weekends. She quit school service and had her own practice as a psychotherapist. Meanwhile she is retired. Life is long! You can do so many things.
Women hold 66% of student debt in the u.s
And men pay 66% of all income taxes. Weird
Al Bundy..perfect patriarch.
There's nothing wrong with wanting to be ready to have children. As the child of a single mother, waiting til you're a little older just makes sense.
Spot on đŻ
It's very apparent when you watch shows from other countries. Strong fathers and competent men, brothers, husbands
They want you in the work force.
The higher the demand for jobs the lower the wages.
The higher demand for workers higher the wages.
The family is the backbone of civil society
If it wasnât orchestrated you would have to be at the peak of your accomplishments as a man in your early twenties. Give thanks for the buffer zones. The biggest enemy in all of order is the transiency of our society which we must overcome and adapt to. The leadership had to find a way to hold everyone up and ensure everyoneâs right to trial and error while the whole world gets more connected with all new unidentified members and new tricks
my opinion aside, here oin the UK, women over 40 having healthy babies is almost double that of women in their 20's, this means that fertility is not an issue, so should not be used as an argument. However, having babies older is not good. I am 48, I cannot imagine raising a baby now, I'm too old for that sh!t.... We ARE meant to have babies young. Mother nature will give a young mother her figure back almost immediately and all the energy she needs
The more people working (men and women), the greater the tax revenue and consumer spending. This however, comes at the expense of a moral and balanced societyâŠ
He is right that woman should absolutely submit to their husband but as an asexual woman I will never have a husband, what will I do?
I can relate to the whole discontent with the bs being pushed on modern TV. People are having to move to watching anime to get some form of a strong and well written male character of significance. They are also plaguing video games with the whole SIMP male characters and woke boss babe strong characters who if you put the traits they have onto men, the men will be labeled as "evil and toxic".
It seems like heâs scared of women
It's all about money. Social media saw one house and only saw Men making money. So they said to themselves How Do We Get More Money Out of People. Let's Tell Women They Can Go Out There And Make Money Also. That's when the Nuclear Family ended.
Itâs hard to tell but is this guy crying?
All jokes aside.. I have never thought about it before, but I donât think heâs wrong about tv showsâŠ
Is he saying he wants kids to be married at a young age and have kids early?..
Let's not forget the havoc birth control is bringing on these young deluded women.
Absolutely spot on!!!
Young Sheldon is the only show which shows a strong father and stay at home wife and because it is a sit-com. It does make fun of both men and women.
Sadly, it requires TWO incomes to get by for most people now...let alone purchase a home...and yes men are on the short-end of the stick in terms of graduation, social mobility, and financial security on top of all the mental health issues and more. So, do we as men want to disincentivize our partners from higher education or are we capable of equitably sharing our responsibilities in the workplace and at home? Because the single, sole-provider family isn't coming back...the market and autonomy of women will not allow it. It forces women to change as well in their evaluation of partners...what does this man bring to the table that isn't solely financial security? Regardless, I want my daughter to exceed in this regard...to go through higher education and use her reasoning to discern who may be a healthy, reliable partner.
Not a huge leap to eugenics from there.
Yep, the worst thing to happen to us fellas is yâall split tails gettimg so dern smart.
You call this smart ?
My husband is my HERO â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€
And this makes unbridled immigration necessary, which destroys the culture.
But I wonder why this seems to happen all over the world. Even insular countries like Japan are going the same way.
Instagram kicks their ass when it comes to home schooling
Dude I hate how they always interrupt
We all have price tags on our backs to our gov.
I completely agree with your facts woman shouldnât try to do the same things as men bc their not the same , as an asexual woman I wonât have a husband or children and I am infertile what do I do?
Man this guy is spitting facts.
Wait wait, women should be able to get an education. Why it is so expensive in America is another debate. We're mixing up topics here. But I agree, the situation indeed makes family life (unnecessarily?) harder.
It's expensive because gov gives out loans instead people paying it for themselves. This allows the businesses that act as universities and colleges to constantly raise their prices.
Let's also not ignore the tuition, which is a flat rate note based on the degree. No one considers the earning potential of the degree they get.
@@alexwerner487 If they had to pay it for themselves, they would think about it more.
@edheldude well yes. That's why not everyone went to college in the past, but now its pushed that you must go.
I've been saying this for 6 years đ
This guy simply don't know what he is talking about...
What women should actually do is bring up a family & then go study: make the best use of your biological advantage
He didnt watch turkish tv series it seems!
Libido Dominandi.
Hands down, the best portrayal of peak husband/father masculinity to ever be in a tv series was Al Bundy in Married With Children.
All facts
đŻ. Well said.
Not really
Meh. I don't think the government is pushing women into higher ed. NGOs certainly are. But government subsidies are just being generally distributed.
The dad is villainized and excited if the show lady long enough
vvomen can have all the degrees. They still cry and complain on tik tok about being single and aloneđ€Ąâïž
I live Gypsy, I die gypsy...
her ] ohhhh sorry am 49 now i get it } me sigh
She knows it to be true
Late teens early 20s best time for women to have children
No it's 25-30
No it's not it's 25 to 30
â@@clouds9914It's not worth your breath convincing.Someone like this to change will never work
@@HarlEyQuiNN80085 it's so annoying I swear they are lowering the age very year, "late teens" really?
@clouds9914 I know i've even heard someone i'm saying this should be old as 16 It makes me feel disgusting
I met 1000 women in nyc that have art degrees and thats so wrong. Why they all tryna be artists
If women getting out in the world and growing up and gaining experience before they settle down is "anti-natalism" then yeah, sure. But it isn't, thats just being a functioning human being.
How did "gaining experience" turn into promiscuity and growing up turn into going into massive debt? You can have a family, have a life, and grow together with your husband. Taking on responsibility is the epitome of growing up. Being a degenerate is just extending your teenage to late adulthood.
@edheldude Well because when you're young you tend to date around as a means of figuring out what you want in a partner and that often means having sex with multiple partners. I don't think it "turned into" that, thats how young people have been since forever. As for the debt, if that's in the form of student loans, then that's just an unfortunate reality. It would be good to have free education but that's just not the way things are right now.
I agreez you could get married when you're in you're early 20s and some people do and that's fine, but by and large, young people tend to explore the world and them selves before settling down, it just happens to be that they're settling down later than they used to.
So is this man seriously trying to suggest that women should marry and have kids young instead of seek higher education and qualifications?
For tax generating purposes...
The Simpsons family guy and South Park are our last hope
Homer and Peter are both dumbasses and laughing stocks as fathers and leaders of the family. Also these two shows are very much left leaning and woke nowadays
As an OB Nurse I can tell you that fertility is based of pure genetics. Ive seen women in their early 20s having a hard time getting pregnant while the ladies in their late 30s conceive so easily. Women back in the day had alot of kids and would still conceive in their 40s. And yes education for women is important. Having a good job so they can have retire and receive money is important. Ive seen elderly ladies who only receive a small amount retirement money from what their husbands worked. Which is like 500 monthly. It sucks.
Thank you for your opinion.
I prefer to be a doctor than housewife for sure
But i am woman so university is not for me
Against God is what it is.
The pick me status is really high
They also like the tax money women pay. I think u taught me that in another short u posted đ
Agree on the shows being âwokeâ these days which is funny cause when I was a kid there were so many strong female leads and now the new ones seem weak or dumb in comparison. On the other side of the video do what you want itâs a free county. Granted Iâve never been pro college only reason I agreed to go was > me- âhey family since you endlessly push college Iâll go but only if you pay for itâ family-âof course we willâ now im 20000$ in debt for a degree I didnât even need they want to wait on Bidens forgiveness shit where grandmama died moneys in a trust for me and I canât touch it even though itâs enough to pay for it and Iâd kill myself before putting money into it since itâs not what was agreed in the first place
Straight facts
Both parties here are wrong. If you actually look at this from an unbiased and logical perspective you would see what im talking about.
Usually I agree with him but not on this statement, I think he is thinking this too much
He's conveniently ignoring the Economic Elephant in the room: Can't nobody afford no damned kids!
He's assuming its not a single mom and she actually stays with her baby daddy as a family.
@@DmanDice I am too
Telling woman that they dont just have to choose one lifstlye isnt anti family its just saying you dont have to if you dont want to and heres these other alternatives i dont really understand this obsession with how others run there romantic relationships because the truth is your opinion of someone elses relationship doesn't matter if in that relationship it is consensual and both are happy with how its being run because at the end of the day you dont get to decide what makes others happy and not happy im starting to think its just that people just want to control others and cant accept that there way of life doesnt work for everyone so they dream of being a tyrant
Yeah because women seem so happy now with these other choices that have been pushed on us.
@@Luciana_McC_99 you could just not do the other choices if they don't make you happy it's pretty simple really
@@bdoopy4167 I saw how miserable so many women are having to get up and go to work every day I was smart enough not to make that mistake but so many felk for for it. But yeah I am seeing more and more women realize they were lied to so that's a good thing. I'm not talking about women that have a real passion to fly a plane or become a fashion designer or whatever that's obviously different. But most women are just working to pay their bills and get by . I love being a stay at home mom, and I don't know any that don't . Everyday I feel loved , safe and pretty . If you could find a good loving husband that would make that possible for you I think most women now days are wishing they had that privilege. Because it is a privilege that I wouldn't trade for anything.
@@Luciana_McC_99 exactly just like I said do what works for you as you said there are woman who enjoy there career and woman who like being stay at home mom's
@@bdoopy4167 you don't understand or do and just don't want to admit the government and everyone else isn't just giving people a choice they spend billions of dollars to force most people into not being able to choose anything else but what they want everyone to be a wage slave. many women are not working right now because it's their choice but it's not possible for them to do anything else. Also go to any stay at home moms videos of her just talking about how happy she is and see all the angry feminist comments saying the most ugly things to these women just because they are happy. also how old are you sister ? Because either you never had to work as a woman or your just not being honest if your going to pretend you have no idea what I'm talking about.
Giving women a choice to do whatever they want to do⊠anti natalism⊠Iâm sure there is a great solution you advocate for this âproblemâ that is not a bad look at allâŠ
What is the purpose of antinatalism, it will happen by itself, you don't have to push it?
Is everyone in this comment section bat$hit insane
Yep. Is she blind?
Watch home improvement
Same group of people ask what's stopping women from being ceo or getting top job... then throw remarks like this... trying to argue against higher education for women.
Because popping out 8-13kids is much better for a nation and humanity... and men and women's mental health.
This also vilifies and take no account of women who have fertility difficulties even from birth... and pushes early motherhood... he does know teenage pregnancy is high in US? What kind of culture and movement is he trying to promote?? Or timeloop back to?
This but never mention mortality of women giving birth and with each pregnancy risk is higher...
Feminist is too blame... self-centric lifestyle in modern society especially western family values... used to be a village raising a child... now it's just their parents.
So no wonder why younger generation steer away from having kids in this modern world. Plus once they do have kids they want to provide the world for the few that they have...
Unlike pass generations where they have kids and then work out how to provide for them later... and if they can't they just have more... but that would be a bias generalisation just to drive a bias point... just like all these youtuber podcast wanna be who have extreme opinions for a living to attract views to make $$.
When you are a good enough debater/communicator, you can rationalise any idiocy. Especially with tunnel vision and blinders on.
This guy seems to want to keep women locked up.
How did you get that from what he said? He said nothing of sorts. You've been pre-programmed to have emotional reactions to certain topics and that's what he was talking about re: family.
@edheldude not from just this clip. Others too. Everything these red pill podcasts say is about how women should basically be breeding machines and be slaves to husbands. Always submit to the husband. They also only want 19 or 20 years olds so they're definitely groomers and pedophiles.
Instead of findinf women who share their views, they want to control every woman.
@@user-fu6ql2yg5w but he is trying to control them all instead of just looking for women who would fit his own ideals.
Biologically yes. However does a 19yo have the mental and emotional acuity to be a good mother? This acuity begins with the selection of a good father.
And if her father raises her right she can pick good. Statistically most are out of wedlock so not a stable situation.
At what age do you think person have mental and emotional acuity for selection of a good partner? at the every age the criteria of idea/definition/longing-of ideal partner changes, isn't it? Thought I do fully support that women should study to their best capacity but I also believe women can raise a family with values and keep family to gather even in hardest time. Society has and even now only value job that earns money and feel it has major contribution to this. If the society (especially men) acknowledge and recognize the importance of home-maker role, you would find many more happy healthy joint families and many social nuisance, crime would drop.
All you have to do is look how society is and if that's not proof enough then you are blind. The age between 19-25 is the time to have a family but all you see is the glorification of a single mom with no strong father figure.
@@anupshah9779 homemaker is undervalued.
Perhaps it is associated with gold digger. In an average house, with modern appliances and school age kids, what does a homemaker do?
From experience I can say family of 4 , 3 bedroom, 4 bathroom, all housework done by Tuesday. Then what?
â@@mro2352đđđ§đĄđđź đŠđȘđđŁđŁ: Why can't she not make a good decision without her father đ
And abortion "rights"
He wants to bring back father knows best. Another lie in our American history. No one had that life
Red Foreman was the best TV dad of all time.
Married men have been portrayed as oafs since the 90's
I did.
I must disagree with him. There are too many teenage girls having children and that's not right. You should be at least 21 years old to be allowed to have children, because children must be raised in well-structured families and it needs money.
Education is dangerous. Where have i heard that before?
The fever dream of every pseudo-intellectual leftist
I donât agree with that đ I think that women should definitely go to school and should put that over a family thatâs stupid to say and sexist
Well you're wrong
Non sense. People can do baby later. Gvt needs a 2+ kids per woman, to make it in the future. So, nobody, absolutely nobody wants to prevent a family creation.
We don't need to make a family early in life, because our children will survive age 5 much more than in the past.
A time where this man is stuck.
the science of biology disagrees with your assessment
@@swordoftruth7862 Tell me more Mr Science of Biology?
The lack of birth is common to all developed countries.
It's a problem, not a goal. Stop being paranoiac about gouvernement.
Yet right now over half of women in their 30s in England are single and childless. You can look at any statistics about birth rates etc. and see the destructive results of what Andrew was just pointing out.
Women can choose. That's all it is. Andrew just hates the choices they are making and therefore hates the fact they have a choice.
Listen if they make it a choice I would have no problem. But the thing is they say: "men are dumb and useless" / "we don't need men" / "cheat and sleep with thousand of men. You go queen" etc. When you push such radical ideas its a problem...its not a choice its brainwash!
If it was: "To be a mom is very beautiful and men are not useless. You can choose anything you want just have the pros and cons in mind before you make the choice" I would have no problem with it.
And many are choosing horribly and he's trying to help them, so they aren't miserable when they are older, because they chose horribly when they were younger.
â@goitidanielaser2167 đđđ§đĄđđź đŠđȘđđŁđŁ: yeah that is sort of true that there are some of us that do propagate that but we also have the treatment like the same because the entire retro movement is just how to get the best type of woman seeing them as more of property than of people so we should have the choice of if we want to even date a man or not having a kid in a young age doesn't make you beautiful
â@christopherreeves5592 đđđ§đĄđđź đŠđȘđđŁđŁ: Didn't he say that women can't drive? And andrew tape reminds me of Mister j and he was a piece of shit towards me and I see the same clause in this bald egg of a man I feel like some people just defend anything he does. He even said he moved to the country he got arrested in because he liked the rape laws. At some point it goes beyond trolling, and most trolling is terrible behavior anyways
@@HarlEyQuiNN80085 Funny I cant see my comment. YT wont allow me to see it lol. I wonder if its not intentional. Anyhow I don't quite understand what u meant with the comment but I can say it is a mistake to wait till 30+ to have a child. Women are fertile while young. The older you get the lower the eggs are and the higher chances of making a sick baby(for example Down Syndrome). Not to mention you will be "uglier". Brainwashing women that a career is more important than a family is criminal. Sure some women cant have children or don't want any but those that want a baby are brainwashed to do it later(when its high risk or too late)