''What is a "contradiction" as envisaged by S.162 Cr.P.C.Evidentiary Value:Justice V Ramkumar

Powered by Restream restream.io/
''What is a "contradiction" as envisaged by S.162 Cr.PC, how to prove it & what is its evidentiary value?": Justice V. Ramkumar,Former Judge Kerala High Court
Host
Beyond Law CLC

[@zeeshantaj1302]

Wonderful sir.
Zeeshan from Pakistan

[@vijaypatel2286]

Very well explained in clear Terms, the DELAY in Exam. of Witness under sec. 161 CrPC , Validating it with the most Appropriate citations - which works well with the Judges in TRIAL.
Thanks SIR Jee.

[@vs24_rendition]

Thanks a lot for the citations...Ram kumar sir always gives the citations...This is the best about him...

[@rameshkumarsahoo8628]

❤g

[@chrisreay77]

Sir highly informative as a witness has falsely given oral evidence which they cannot prove without any proof or related to the said case and occurance of exact details and just making up they own version not mentioned in the charge sheet against the accused and need to be examinationd by the advocate to prove that the witness is falsely claiming to be in knowledge of the said case and giving evidence for they own gain to mislead the honourable court to chest the accused by disposing falsely as a property issue is going on the gain false mileage wrongfully and this witness cannot be trusted.thank you sir Very much for personal and public advise is welcome and help by all legal experts.

[@BeyondLawCLC]

Glad you found it useful.

[@sandippaul2866]

Your series of webinars are really helpful, Thanks a lot 🙏

[@BeyondLawCLC]

Thank you for appreciating

[@vipuldesai2028]

Really grateful to you, really admirable toil, achieve pinnacle

[@swapniltawshikar]

What an excellent Session. Very apt questions and to the point answers given by justice...
Thanks to organizers. 🙏

[@BeyondLawCLC]

Thank you for your kind words

[@rahulv8922]

Contradiction excellently explained .... Very aptly citations quoted.... Sir you have absolute clarity of the concept and have very beautifully explained.....Thanks...

[@shekhartalashilkar7063]

Excellent Articulation And Enriching Marvellous Debate. Thank you very much Sir.

[@prasoonpandey7658]

No words for such insightful initiative . Thank you will be too little 🙏

[@BeyondLawCLC]

So true ,his knowledge sharing process is simple and good

[@aakashrajal8402]

Wonderful lecture which is of practical use. Looking forward for the Part -2 of this lecture tommorrow 7th July 2021

[@advocateshaileshpatel3677]

Thank you sir

[@BeyondLawCLC]

So nice of you

[@krishnaprasadkk6755]

Great class thanks a lot

[@shabbirrajput8886]

Section 145 of Indian evidence act is reproduced verbatim as Art 140 of Qanoon e Shahdat order 1984 in Pakistan whereas sections 161 & 162 of cr.p.c are exactly same...so this lecture is so illuminating for professionals in Pakistan as well...thank you

[@ravikajagar1814]

Tq

[@tanmayamishra683]

Excellent interpretation Sir.
With Regards
Tanmaya Mishra, LL.M , Advocate
ଜୟ ଜଗନ୍ନାଥ जय जगन्नाथ*🙏

[@dilippawar9074]

Very valuable for lawyer s

[@priyadarshijha5696]

Justice Ramkumar's knowledge is unmatchable.

[@BeyondLawCLC]

So true

[@JonathanJustus]

Fantastic explanations, masters are clear with their imparting knowledge.

[@msmanjula6789]

Eye witness support prosecution case in chief examination . After that in the cross by accused he turn hostile . What is the next procedure to fallow by the prosecutor

[@vijayjain4314]

Superb sir this is law

[@najmalbabu4062]

Great knowledge

[@maheshuggina554]

Very good explanation

[@govindaraobalivada2457]

Excelent explanations Sir

[@WakilSaheb-dz7mh]

Thanks 🙏

[@rehmatnazir6899]

Very insightful

[@bliss1086]

Excellent

[@Gaminggaming-bf7pz]

I like malayali judge's they are very nice

[@purnachmohapatra7033]

Thank you sir for good teaching.sir what is preliminary chargeshet.1

[@dattatraypachpute4055]

Great lecture sir

[@anandshinde6707]

Very informative lecture.

[@AdvocateChamber]

Love you. Sir

[@68.sreeharisunil77]

Sir try to arrange one lecture once in a week by ramkumar sir

[@shabbirrajput8886]

Improvements in previous statement is considered very damaging for the worth of the statement of a witness...imprisonment s shake & devalue the statement..such witness is not relied upon if his/her statement carries dishonest improvements...

[@m.isharma4463]

Very beautiful

[@legalguru6614]

Done Watched

[@sukhanaftab7718]

Wonderful minds to share knowledge

[@BeyondLawCLC]

Thank you for appreciating

[@m.isharma4463]

Nice

[@karuppasamypandiyan8455]

so eloquent and fantastic lecture

[@BeyondLawCLC]

Thank you for appreciating

[@beenamishra6168]

Sir please make a lecture on proclamation and attachment under crpc and also on maintainace u/s 125-128

[@mohitsharma8890]

How to mark the passage from 161 CrPC statement for the purpose of contradiction, if during cross examination witness completely rejects his 161 CrPC statement saying "I don't know what police has written, this is not the statement I gave, police have completely changed my version"

[@Gaminggaming-bf7pz]

How to get note

[@shabbirrajput8886]

Learnt a lot indeed ...so enlightening lecture

[@umangagrawal9769]

Done complete 20 july 2021 thanks

[@maheshm627]

Good

[@prashantrajput9923]

Superb Sir 🙏

[@BeyondLawCLC]

Thank you

[@meenakharkongor3293]

Sir, in a pocso case, the victim had given a totally different version from she stated before the police. She had already been crossexamined by the previous defence counsel, but the contradictions was not put to her. Now a new counsel has entered but the court is not allowing to recall her U/s 311 Crpc, stating that she is a victim and cannot be victimizated. Can the contradictions brought out from the I/o of the case .

[@addalavenkataratnam5449]

Air 1988 Indira Gandhi case
Death of kin and kith ,Delay can be explained.

[@legalresearch8703]

I shall be glad if any one can say identical provisions of Indian Criminal Procedure Code are in the British Criminal Procedure Code ?. After all Cr. P.C..is a colonial legislation which is a Bible for Indian legislatures even after about more than 150 years.

[@babumathew6413]

Sir. S .161 and the mandate therein to avoid the tendency to incriminate runs counter to the person including the accused.

[@addalavenkataratnam5449]

Tahasildar singhv vs up about contradiction.