LIVE: Karen Read Trial | DAY 11
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 06. 2024
- Did Karen Read murder her boyfriend, Boston Police officer John O'Keefe, or is she the victim of a conspiracy to frame her for his death by the Canton Police Department in Massachusetts? This is Day 10 of her trial.
Everything you need to know about this case to get started: • Who REALLY Murdered Jo...
Full LegalBytes Karen Read Trial Playlist: • Massachusetts v. Karen...
TIME STAMPS:
0:00 Dedication to Shareen
4:00 Welcome!
9:53 State’s Witness No. 28 - Caitlin Albert - Cross-Exam
48:55 State’s Witness No. 28 - Caitlin Albert - Redirect
54:48 State’s Witness No. 28 - Caitlin Albert - Re-Cross
56:15 State’s Witness No. 29 - Tristin Morris - Direct
1:08:25 State’s Witness No. 29 - Tristin Morris - Cross-Exam
1:40:44 State’s Witness No. 29 - Tristin Morris - Redirect
1:42:49 State’s Witness No. 30 - Sara Levinson - Direct
2:20:53 State’s Witness No. 30 - Sara Levinson - Cross-Exam
2:39:55 State’s Witness No. 30 - Sara Levinson - Redirect
2:43:11 State’s Witness No. 31 - Julianna Nagel - Direct
3:23:55 State’s Witness No. 31 - Julianna Nagel - Cross-Exam
CONTEXT:
On the morning of January 29, 2022, John O'Keefe's body was found on a snowy lawn in front of the home of fellow police officer Brian Albert. The night before, he had gone to a bar with his girlfriend, Karen Read, as well as some friends and acquaintances, including Brian. Not long after, Karen was charged with John's murder, but her defense alleges that she is being framed by the group of people who met up at Brian's home after the bar closed. Trial begins Tuesday, April 16, 2024 with jury selection.
To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon:
YT Members: / @legalbytesmedia
Locals: legalbytes.locals.com
Patreon: / legalbytes
--------------------
🚨 Our podcast:
Anchor: anchor.fm/legalbytes
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4i3YLop...
Apple Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Google Podcast: podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0...
--------------------
🚨 We have a @LegalBytes Clips channel for clips from our live streams. Subscribe here: / @legalbytesclips4042
--------------------
Follow me here!
Twitter: / legalbytesmedia
Instagram: / legalbytesmedia
Facebook: / legalbytesmedia
--------------------
Merch: legal-bytes.creator-spring.com
--------------------
#KarenRead #JusticeforJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead
In memory of Shareen 💙 She was the first person I ever chatted to on here and she made me feel so welcome. Chat was always a little brighter when she was around. Will miss her very much xxx
The fact that the prosecution wants the juror to believe that John’s body was laying there and about 10 people left the home and didn’t see a body is insane. I feel like that hurts the states case about Karen Read hitting him and he was just laying there and 10 people didn’t see him. Is absolutely insane.
The one thing I keep coming back to is, a man is lying dead on the lawn of someone's house, and the police did not go into the house and also didn't interview all the occupants of the house till months later. This definitely stinks to high heaven of a cover up
And the first responder cop with training who owned the house never went outside
Police knew it was the house of a policeman, that’s why they didn’t go to the house.
I can map the movements of all the Alberts and their friends, when they came and left, who was playing the music and through which speakers, but has any evidence been presented on KR other than she had a glass of clear liquid at a bar?
3:28:05 "I don't recall" 3:28:23 "Yes" to the exact same question.
The headlights of every car that backed out of the driveway to pass by the house would have shined across the ENTIRE lawn as the car slowly went from an angle to straighten out in the road. In those bright lights, not one person saw a large body, excessive blood lost, shoe, hat or 47 pieces of red plastic??
Reflective red plastic at that!
The Karen Read Trial: Brought to you by White Claw.
And snow! 😂
Caitlin Albert is coming across as very stroppy. I don't think defense is aggressive at all, just firm.
Crossexamnesia- it comes on suddenly!
There's a pretty big CZcamsr who trains police dogs and prottion dogs. I watched an interview with him on another Attorney's CZcams channel and he said without out a shadow of doubt those cuts on Johns arm are dog bites. He also sent the photos to several other K9 hander cops and they immediately said dog bites.
When dogs aren't trained properly or they just dont make the cut, they will make shallow bites with the canines only .When the person is bit, they pull the arm to get away from thebite which causes lacerations, not puncture wounds. Also, just doing a simple Google search of dog bites, you see, most of them look like they were cut with a knife. I really hope the defense brings in some kind of expert in dog bites or even a protection dog trainer who knows about dog bites. I'll go find the name of the channel and the video title if anyone wants to go check it out.
Video is Karen Read: John o'keefe - Lexus or dog bite. The channel is Attorney Melanie Little
Thanks for sharing! I'll check it out. The injuries on the arm definitely look like the dog bites I googled. @@KellyeR1970
I would have gone insane if I had had to question that second witness. This guy is the definition of "I can't even remember what I had for breakfast"
The count is at least 8 to 10 people left this house, between 12 am to 2 am, (snowing but not needing to be scrapped yet) and no one saw John.
She remembers where and how everyone was sitting, but doesnt remember if Colin was there or had left?
If there was only a dusting of snow, how did so much get beneath him?
He fell on it or he was placed there after snowfall. Neither is great for the prosecution.
Exactly!!
Honestly I was with the prosecution for a second around the testimony of a lump…but then I was like…but he had been there for hours when it was barely any snow but he was found on several inches of snow. Seems impossible unless she came back at 3 am to drop him off and hit him…
@@sallycinnamon5370 I feel that it's more likely that something happened to him somewhere around the property, and that two or more people made the only available plan that allowed them to avoid having to deal with a death.
Any death inside the house and after he was dropped off was on them. Especially if the death was not clear to be accidental. The very last moment that was outside their responsibility was as he was dropped off. Since we have yet to hear from any medical professionals about his injuries, like did he receive a blow or injury after or before death and so on, it's difficult to say anything. There is so much reasonable suspicion around every aspect of this case thus far, and there has yet to be a single piece of evidence supporting the prosecution's theory.
I know how Karen feels. You can see her lip curl as she looks at her accusers. Especially after that testimony!
I feel like after making him go through a trial, tristen and Caitlin should get engaged. Like that's some love and dedication 😂
I'm bad with time too. HOWEVER, I would have asked this witness, the boyfriend, whether he had showed up on time to give his testimony in court and, how, if he was so bad with time, he managed to arrive to court on time.
My condolences to Shareens family...she will be greatly missed ❤
So sorry🙏🏻🙏🏻💔💔
Legal bites touched me
Love your comment about Baby Bytes 😍
He has a tell. (The boyfriend)
_'Father in heaven into your care I entrust my spirit'_ *- Luke 23:46*
I watched you as long as I could stand. You being ok with turtle boy being denied his 1st amendment rights did it for me.
Awww Indy standing with her fellow furry friends 😂❤
Rest in peace shareen
I know one thing - if I go to Canton MA, I'm staying clear of The Alberts!!! They are the Boogie Man, Candyman, Freddy, Michael Myers and Carrie all in one family!!!!
The whole town is in on the lie and cover up...
Absolutely
Does anyone else feel like this is a whodunnit? Since they botched the investigation, we now are getting statements from everyone ?
I just don’t understand the prosecution’s case.
Norfolk is the county that Canton & Dedham are in. The Case is in Dedham Superior, being tried by Norfolk County DAO - it wasn't moved, just an FYI ☺️
Thank you for that clarification!!
Thank you.
All the witnesses themselves know they are hostile to the defense, just because of the opening statement of the defense, regardless of what they all went through, or learned prior to the trial.
The jury knows the same thing, and should have a say on if they want a corrupt law enforcement system or not.
Witnesses are not present for opening statements...
@@dermegger7733 except for they're probably at home watching the opening statements on TV or on the Internet. Regardless of if they're not allowed to. It is very clear that these witnesses know where to lie and what's a lie about.
@@MrSnivelupagus I think I might have misunderstood your initial comment the first time through. But yes, even if they hadn't seen opening statements, they probably saw at least some of the pre-trial coverage/interviews or they've been informed by the prosecution.
Hello and thank you for the update on this trail much appreciated…… sorry to hear about the
moderator Sherine. It’s a shock when it’s so unexpected even when it is it’s bad bless her she’ll be in heaven now with the 💞 no angels. Karen Read innocent.
Shareen 💙💙
Hi there! I've been watching since the beginning of the KR trial. I would LOVE to be GIFTED a membership! How does this happen or work? Please let me know how to be 'hooked up'....
I think you have to be subscribed and watching the live when someone gifts them and then it's random.
Same! I usually miss the live due to time difference but would love a membership as watch every video ♡
I hope you get a membership soon! ♡
Tristin Morris reminds me of Johnny Tightlips in so many ways
I guess Julie Nagel thinks her bro hit John since Karen left before him
Awwww baby bytes hahahahah 💙💙
Dating 78 years and he still hasn’t proposed !!
I have heard you say more than once that the procecution needs to explain the snow under O'Keefe, but I can only recall and find testimony from Flematti stating 4-6 inches on the ground when dispatched, with 4 inches of snow up the sides of the body. Was there different testimony I have missed?
Not that I think that means much, as snow can compact under weight.
Timestamp 16.54 of your day 3 live stream for the testimony on depth of snow around Mr O'Keefe.
I want to say there were at least two other first responders who testified to seeing ~6 inches of snow beneath him. The first was Officer Steve Saraf (Day 1 stream, around 1:27:15 ish), and Officer Steve Mullaney was the second (Day 2 stream, around 1:14:30 ish). There may have been others who echoed it too but I can’t remember.
Thank you, I forget you take transcripts. They will come in handy when we are 80 witnesses in. Have fun going through those!
I feel the prosecution failed in each case to ask the extra question to elaborate on how much snow was actually under him.
The question was also potentially avoided on cross, because the answer is likely that there was much less depth of snow snow under him. Again I don't consider it proof of anything personally.
Am I sad for being excited by the potential for a snow expert on this case? 😂
I am on the side that this is all very suspicious either way.
Was does the mic sound weird?
If I had seen something that might have been said body in the snow, knowing how this case was going, I'd be screaming from the rooftops ....hey, I saw something I saw something. You would know darn well it was extremely important to the case. You wouldn't just now be saying something. You may have even gone to the press to tell what you saw ,especially since you were so tight with the family. That one thing might make people believe the family had nothing to do with it. I 100% believe she's now making this up. She was just feet away had she really seen something, you would know it was a body. When Karen came looking for John hours later, she immediately saw him, and he would have been much more covered by snow at the time . If you just break it down and use common sense, it doesn't add up.
My exact thoughts! And has she felt awful that she ignored it? No, because I too think she made it up. Very selective memory like so many witnesses.
She doesn’t realize how absurd her statement was. I would be embarrassed to try and suggest that from the stand
So Julie Nagel chose a PB&J over saving someone’s life? Uhhhh what
The boyfriend isn’t quite bright. I’ve seen other videos of him and his behaviour
The Albert family and associates are so shady.
❓would they be able to get the records off Brian Alberts phone contract when he update his phone..yhen they can pin down exact date before or after not destroy phone or data..
I will add anyone reversing down that drive and having to turn the vehicle to go in the direction of the flag pole at some point the headlights would hit the exact spot where John would have be found when reversing..The front of the vehicle would of done a fill arch of the whole of the front lawn while reversing at the end of the drive on to the road to face direction of the flag pole till the headlights landed directly on the road in front to drive forward..
Something up with that mic. Sounds like you're on a telephone.
Did her father state Higgins got to the house before them and parked on yhe drive and he didn't want to bloke him in so Jiggins reversed off the drive and he couldn't remember where he parked his truck.she was the first in Collon was leaving yet he was still oeaving when Nicholas entered and he didn't leave till Brian Albert was in the toilet.if ive git that right..she didn't want to get snowed in but had her boyfriend drive in such bad weather,as the Commonwealth keeps reminding us,when he also has to get up around 3am. Right!
Yall wanna make a bet? I bet Jen McCabe pleads the 5th and says nothing.
Her bf Tristan just makes himself look guilty or suspicious at the very least. He just seems like a cocky jerk, honestly, and it's a SUPER bad look in my opinion.
Jen McCabe got into Nagel’s head. Jen is a control freak, she does it because she can.
It may be the old motivation of attention seeking.
The "youths" Brian-Jr, Caitlin, Sarah and the Nagle person all came across as a group of privileged young people, and they truly seem to have been coached. Brian Jr and the Nagle person truly angered me they were flip and sarcastic and seemed to be very "entitled" in their attitude. all these young people are well into "adulthood" and still live at home w/parents? AND Nagle has her brother come to get her and then changes her mind, when there is a "blizzard coming"? Something aint right with this crew, and shame on Nagle for not looking into the Black thing in the yard, Shame on Brian Albert, a first responder who NEVER is interested enough to go outside and check what is happening with first responders, I call BS on his "there was nothing for me to do".
What's the benefit for her to make this up
Protecting friends and family is always a reason for many. You don't have to know what actually happened. You need to want to try to protect family, and this happens easier if you don't know what happened and you are being pressured or manipulated. "I can't believe this drunk driving murderer is trying to blame us for what happened. Let's make sure she doesn't succeed."
❤🕉️
Fff your mods
But she is only saying she hadn’t give the height of the object? I think the defence is doing awful - I don’t know what the attitude towards the Boston police is over there, but it’s obviously awful as the bias is really odd to me. She obviously hit the guy, the tail light is there and they were clearly having a row which is why they were parked outside and not going straight in. A conspiracy involving that many people - give me a break, there’s no way! Dublin, Ireland.
I haven't seen any irrefutable evidence that she did hit him and cause his death, the questioning from defense and how everyone is answering definitely leaves some witnesses looking really shady and questionable, and has so far shown the negligence from the police department to properly secure and procure the evidence. Without video proof, we cannot say if she did or didn't hit him, much like we can't say that the piece(s) of taillight were not planted after the fact. There is witness testimony where not everyone is corroborating the same story eg her yelling "I killed him" vs "is he dead". Why were phone calls shortly answered in the middle of the night but witnesses are denying even taking those calls? A missed call whether they left a voice mail or not does not show a length of time, just a missed call icon. Length of time only shows when you've answered the call. I personally think, based on current evidence, she's not guilty or at the very least the evidence doesn't prove without a doubt that she did kill him. I am fully neutral about police myself, and the defense could have 0 issues with police from a moral stand point but are showing this specific force's incompetence/ possible deception in this investigation.
Are you even watching the trial? None of those things have been introduced as evidence except pieces of the tail light that were found days later.
@@ashley4290agreed!
That's basically what the police want you to believe. However, there has yet to be any evidence of any foul play from Read's part, but the prosecution's case isn't over yet.
A conviction requires evidence, because a lot of things are possible. There are numerous possible outcomes from that night, but thus far there has been no evidence to point towards Read in any way. At this point it has been shown that she dropped O'Keefe off, and that's it. This is demonstrated only because she said she did and everyone agreeing to it.
@@ashley4290 yeah thats what we would all think IF there wasnt SOOOO much shady shit involved with this family, brian albert supposedly got completely rid of his phone and changed carriers a DAY before he got a court order to preserve his phone. The cop who impounded karens car lied about what time he picked it up and had it for an hour, there is video evidence of karen backing into a car which caused the taillight to crack at her house, the 4 cops in the area searched the whole area that night but didnt see any pieces of tail lights until after her car was already in their posesion, a bunch of people left the house that night but didnt see a huge man laying dead on the front lawn, they got rid of their family dog they had for years, all these people are connected and have powerful connections with the goverment of that state, Brian alberts wife googled "how long to die in cold" hours before she supposedly knew anyone was laying in her yard, The nephew had a problem with the cop that died and nobody really saw him leave or knew exactly when he left, i mean shit i can keep going, with all that taken into account if you say you KNOW karen did it you are just basing it off assumption and emotions rather than all the shady shit the defense has proven to be true and the prosecution hasnt really proven ANYTHING yet besides karen drove a car that night......
It’s killing me because you keep saying she said she drank a lot, she literally said she was intoxicated and you missed it because you were doing something else. So you keep jumping back on saying that she said something completely different. Please please watch this with us and stop drifting off.
The entire Albert family are lying and deceptive