justin beamon I guess I need to do a little more research because I thought the zo6 motor was a sc 6.4 and not a 6.2. Regardless slapping a pro charger on that would make it one mean son of a bitch
ughh the Yukon has the exact and I mean exact interior as the Tahoe. its the difference of blue led vs red led, and chevy logo vs gmc. I prefer the exterior styling of the Yukon, but wife wanted a Tahoe. Also if your looking for a 3rd row, just get a suburban or Yukon xl, the 3rd row on those have 10 more inches of leg room, and the 3rd row is positioned better for a spot to put your feet.
Are you guys going to demo the new Traverse? No it's not a V8 but man that's a beauty. I sold my Traverse and went Mazda CX9 Grand Touring but the Traverse I really like.
Honestly I would take the Durango SRT. More hp, faster, more interior room especially 3rd row, better on road handling thanks to independent suspension, sounds better, more comfortable seats. And the SRT costs less.
This or a Denali? Or would you go with something else?
Truck Central I'd like to see GM make a Denali RST or an Escalade RST
Truck Central Trackhawk
This.
Truck Central Between this and Denali? Denali. Durango SRT looks like a hell of a deal
Truck Central Durango SRT all day over this
There's no doubt that this stunning new Tahoe RST is getting a ton of air time - and rightfully so! Thanks for sharing!
I would love to see something like this with the same motor as the zo6
Jake Piaskowski It does, just add a supercharger and it's basically the same 6.2 engine.
justin beamon I guess I need to do a little more research because I thought the zo6 motor was a sc 6.4 and not a 6.2. Regardless slapping a pro charger on that would make it one mean son of a bitch
The go pro pointing in from the outside was not a good angle at all. Terrible glare
ughh the Yukon has the exact and I mean exact interior as the Tahoe. its the difference of blue led vs red led, and chevy logo vs gmc. I prefer the exterior styling of the Yukon, but wife wanted a Tahoe. Also if your looking for a 3rd row, just get a suburban or Yukon xl, the 3rd row on those have 10 more inches of leg room, and the 3rd row is positioned better for a spot to put your feet.
I think on the LT you get appearance stuff but not the suspension or brakes, as well as not having the 6.2L.
0:39seconds. Did it move faster? LoL it needs a supercharger or turbos!!!!!
"You can make it do this" crickets crickets. Lol jk good review
It'd make a good grocery getter for the wife.
Are you guys going to demo the new Traverse? No it's not a V8 but man that's a beauty. I sold my Traverse and went Mazda CX9 Grand Touring but the Traverse I really like.
I would just get the Durango SRT. Only thing that would make me turn my head back to this is adding a Supercharger.
I heard the brakes aren't great on this. Jeff would you say that holds true?
Upgraded front brakes were good - you still need a heavy foot to haul it all in, but that's pretty much any full-size truck or SUV.
The Hooniverse thank you sir. After more research I realized this isn't even worth it compared to the Durango SRT
Is this basically a reboot / Tahoe version of the old cat eyed regency’s ?
383 ft. Lbs for the 5.3
You don't drive this for fuel economy
Hector616 agree. I feel the same way with performance cars.
Hahah making noise... not moving much faster. It’s rather slow...
78k? Get a ram rt instead
Go with the Land Cruiser. They're better off road and way more reliable.
Honestly I would take the Durango SRT. More hp, faster, more interior room especially 3rd row, better on road handling thanks to independent suspension, sounds better, more comfortable seats. And the SRT costs less.
Hard to argue that.
It also tows more.
justin beamon smh if you believe that I got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. Good luck with the longevity of any Fiat product
Bring that beast in for a cleaning!
420🚬
V8 and V4 mode.... lol noob.