Physics - Ch 66.5 Quantum Mechanics: The Hydrogen Atom (37 of 78) What is the Fine Structure?

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 21. 08. 2018
  • Visit ilectureonline.com for more math and science lectures!
    In this video I will explain what is the fine structure in the hydrogen atom. When examining the H-alpha line under high resolution, a pain of lines are seen very closely spaced together. The same was seen with deuterium.
    Next video in this series can be seen at:
    • Physics - Ch 66.5 Quan...

Komentáře • 18

  • @thevloghouse3355
    @thevloghouse3355 Před 5 lety +2

    At the quantum level, it’s so exciting to see how atoms are effected in the environment around them. It’s like the Hydrogen atom and the Deuteron atom have different buoyancy level in its own Treacherous environment. I mean it has to handle other light particles, it’s own weather obstacles, etc. the fact that we can sistematicly map this out is amazing!
    It’s great to actually do the math and know its proven in a different way.

  • @Harrab
    @Harrab Před 5 lety +1

    Thank you so much.

  • @brendamenezes7590
    @brendamenezes7590 Před 5 lety +1

    you are amazing sir

  • @ntrev56
    @ntrev56 Před 2 lety +2

    Thanks

  • @WelshGuitarDude
    @WelshGuitarDude Před 3 lety +1

    Why is spin up slightly higher energy than the spin down? Can it be explained or is it just how nature decided?

  • @charlesbrightman4237
    @charlesbrightman4237 Před 5 lety

    Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
    My Current TOE:
    THE SETUP:
    1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
    2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
    3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
    4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
    5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
    FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
    6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
    7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
    8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
    9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
    10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
    11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
    12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
    THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
    13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
    14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
    15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
    16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
    17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
    18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
    THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
    19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
    20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
    21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
    NOTES:
    22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
    23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
    24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
    25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
    26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
    DISCLAIMER:
    27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
    a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
    b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
    c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
    (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
    d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
    e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
    (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
    f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
    (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
    (An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
    'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
    'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.

  • @bebinashanty5545
    @bebinashanty5545 Před 5 lety +3

    Sir but hydrogen has 1 electron with upward spin direction . How can this condition arise

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Před 5 lety +2

      The spin direction can change (and does). We use this to observe portions of the galaxy otherwise not visible to us.

  • @benbatho6880
    @benbatho6880 Před rokem +1

    Loved the video !!👍😁 ur might “fine” yourself 😎🤣

  • @wendlt
    @wendlt Před 2 lety +1

    The issue of the spin axis orientation of the orbiting electron in the hydrogen atom was not discussed in this video. Does the fact that we see only a pair of lines in this fine structure spectrum imply that the orientation of the electron spin axis can only be vertical relative to the plane of its orbital motion about the hydrogen atom? It would seem that if its orientation could vary relative to its orbital plane that we would see many more lines. But maybe it's incorrect to view the electron as having an orbital plane. But then the phenomenon becomes even more confusing. Why doesn't electron spin orientation affect this fine structure issue?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Před 2 lety +2

      My suggestion is to watch the whole series of videos (no one video will contain all of the information you are looking for) and then formulate the questions if anything is missing.

    • @wendlt
      @wendlt Před 2 lety +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen Hmm. Will watching the whole series actually deal with questions regarding electron spin axis orientation? If so I will certainly spend the time to do so. Could we narrow down the most relevant lectures a little?

  • @magn8195
    @magn8195 Před 3 lety

    Does this affect the value of the Rydberg constant for hydrogen and deuterium?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Před 3 lety

      The Rydberg constant itself is independent of the atom (or nucleus), but the Rydberg constant as associated with each specific nucleus (and as used in the calculation of the spectrum associated with the nucleus) will be different

    • @magn8195
      @magn8195 Před 3 lety

      @@MichelvanBiezen Thank you very much for the insight!

  • @saurabdas5467
    @saurabdas5467 Před 3 lety +1

    🎉🎉