Against the Rules: Michael Lewis in Conversation with Malcolm Gladwell
Vložit
- čas přidán 30. 05. 2019
- Two of the leading thinkers of our time-bestselling authors Michael Lewis and Malcolm Gladwell-join us for a conversation about Michael Lewis’s new podcast, Against the Rules.
Everywhere you look, you find anger that is, at bottom, a complaint about fairness. Against the Rules explores the corrosion of fairness in America and around the world, and what it has done to our society, mostly without our noticing. From basketball courts to courts of law, it’s become commonplace to attack and weaken the authority of the people whose job it is to ensure fairness and make the call. Michael Lewis asks what happens when fairness can’t be enforced and what does the decline of the referee means for all of us? Are some people inherently more fair-minded than others? What happens when Americans stop believing in the authority and independence of their referees? Can it ever be regained?
Recorded on April 3, 2019 at 92nd Street Y
Subscribe for more videos like this: bit.ly/1GpwawV
Your support helps us keep our content free for all. Donate now: www.92y.org/donatenow?...
Facebook: / 92ndstreety
Instagram: / 92ndstreety
Twitter: / 92y
Tumblr: / 92y
On Demand: www.92yondemand.org
Michael and Malcolm is an instant click in my world. Everything else can wait. Thank you!
who is Malcolm?
A Joy to listen 2 these 2!
Not sure if this would be ironic or previously done, but I would love to see Malcolm and Michael do a talk or panel on anti-intellectualism and how American culture has democratized expertise.
I'm at 7:44 and had the following observation: this converstation is intellectually and personally honest, it is organic. I like that. Just saying.
I'd watch them roast one another for an hour and 11 minutes.
Wow! You are a remarkable breath of fresh air..I consider my l life a process of constantly Learning!I read Blink and your newest book.on Strangers but truthfully watching your videos have only served to enhance my respect for your ideas..why? Because they are truth based insightful and important.for all of us..from a “dimmer view” the world is at best a “tricky place” I believe if we really HEAR when we listen and SEE when we watch your ideas can be profoundly executed..for me this has been a focused journey including “trusting” my senses..we perhaps might have gained the better tools to live more aware!
I would pay 20 dollars just to watch a video of these two at their dinner following this talk.
20
so good...
Be sure to check out Stacey Abrams in Conversation with Holland Taylor! czcams.com/video/yEg07gU4Hi8/video.html
That girls' softball story is fascinating. I wish someone had a video of it.
I had someone tear down the house! We had to spend months rebuilding the house.
I only wrestled in high school and ran, so I was used to individual sports until I played Lacrosse.
DUDE whoever made this, EYELINES bruv EYELINES, continuity editing 101, hire someone, we don't charge that much
hey glad to find you here lmao
@@maxj1449 this is so good. Did you come here from fb?
I did. Thanks for the recommendatiin
Great conversation! I think I understand what the hell is happening a little bit more .
is it just me, but did it feel like Michael L keeps interrupting Malcolm?. I can't tell if he is actually disrupting the flow or if I just love Malcom Gladwell's voice
Came on my recommendation loved it.
Excellent discussion. My only complaint is Malcolm Gladwell being constitutionally unable/unwilling to ask audience questions. Every. Single. Time. (ref. 1:05:32)
I love that he only squeezes in one audience question each time they meet.
1. Look into Landing Signals Officers (LSOs) in the Navy
2. Consider Sid Meier’s A Memoir! in which he said he had to make games less random to appear more random.
lmao “this was before Me Too”
Wow these guys are serious "frienemies"
Maybe you big hitters could investigate ecocide? Is it happening with reputable lawyers, real results, and helping demand accountability of large corps?
Change is not linear it’s a pendulum - selah
Malcolm can get it. That nerd can get it. 🔥
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs.., there must be a set of Rules like that that applies to Adjudication.
Because 1-0 probability dominant resonance, inherent in Temporal Containment here-now-forever coordinated in probabilistic positioning by logarithmic time-timing condensation modulation.
If you look at the Nodes of condensed harmonic cofactors in density-intensity convergences and the excluded but entangled anharmonic displacement anti-nodes, the inherently heirachical dominance structure of the Holographic Principle Image is "obvious". (Once you see you can't un-see)
Agreement, Arguments and Debates are in this format, by default. The converse of congruency is "empty" Spacing in Perspective and Singularity at the actual limit posited by evidence. Ie @.dt here-now-forever, in Balanced Equilibrium. (Just saying, if you are predisposed to imagine pure-math functionality floating in/on nothing, it's the same as reading a book)
Didn't Feinberg want to be an actor when he was young ?
I watch these interactions and realize how boring and uninteresting the people I know are. I wish I was friends with people like this, unfortunately I'm not interesting enough to keep up with people like this.
This was from May 2019 but You Tube says it's "1 year ago" How is it a year ago when it's 2021??
The clip I’m watching says 2 years. Sometimes it takes YT time to catch up? I don’t know, just guessing.
Umpire Topic? FAA & Boeing Via 737 Max...
While everybody else is focusing on the conversation, i cant help but wonder how beautiful malcolm gladwells long slender fingers are 😭😭😭
The ref thing is because having an accurate ref takes away from the home team advantage and people want their team to win. Who cares if the fans don't want the truth? Let those bitter little babies cry their itty bitty hearts out! Your team sucks get used to it!
Now at 17:10 and Lewis is talking about how refs are treated. I just realized that the topic of refs is a trigger for me because it reminds me of how stupid (statistically significantly stupid) a portion of us humans is. A mentor of mine once commented: the best refs are those that are forgotten. Only a ref would couch it this way. I think because of how stupid a statistically significant portion of us humans is. [March 15th, from the USA, many people still do not believe Coronavirus is that serious.]
Pod casts don't reach people who aren't in the know
I disagree. I have little knowledge on the backstory to a lot of these topics, yet they're still interesting. The way they react to these dilemmas they're describing Is out of left field.
Malcom's hair. Jeesh.
Gladwell? Of all people to not look for the facts of history behind the narrative of the original tea party...
92,,yank,,berarti bukan suami orang,,seluruh dunia tau,,,barack suami,,😦,,lonte,,suamiku di ambil,,lakihku,,gundik,,😦,,ny,,asia obama