@@Muwahid999 I also thought that but when I studied by myself his book "Khilafat o Malookiyat" I find out that it is a myth that maulana maududi criticised sahabas in a very negative way. He also gave authentic references in footnotes which you can also cross check brother.
@@abdulwahabmunir7 There's no doubt that there happened disagreements between Companions رضي الله عنهم But Ahlus Sunnah don't discuss these matters. Its only a few individuals like him who discussed these.
It is not maududi mentioned on his website FOURTH POINT I have been accused of getting my Islaamic “tarbiyah” from the likes of Muhammad Qutub and Maududi, and that I encourage people on my website to read specific books of his! Subhaanallaah, how things can be distorted to fit the desires! I mentioned in an interview on how I accepted Islaam, twenty-eight years ago, that before I was Muslim I was involved in the university Communist movement. Then I read a book by Muhammad Qutb and another by Maududi, which heightened my interest about Islaam (as a NON MUSLIM). Does this mean I received my Islamic tarbiyah from them, or that I aid their minhaj and mistakes? This is indeed tahreef (distortion). And for the record, I do not consider Maududi and Muhammad Qutb to be true scholars. I put the word scholars in quotes to stress this point. Though they are not scholars to be relied on for knowledge, as the scholars are alhamdulillaah available, many laymen consider them such. Check this link bilalphilips.com/reply-to-critics/
Maulana maudidi was the impression man
JazakAllah
Except his criticism of Sahaba (May Allah be pleased with them)
He never criticised them in a negative way @@Muwahid999
@@Muwahid999 I also thought that but when I studied by myself his book "Khilafat o Malookiyat" I find out that it is a myth that maulana maududi criticised sahabas in a very negative way. He also gave authentic references in footnotes which you can also cross check brother.
@@abdulwahabmunir7 There's no doubt that there happened disagreements between Companions رضي الله عنهم
But Ahlus Sunnah don't discuss these matters. Its only a few individuals like him who discussed these.
In matters of hadith teaching and explaining , indian scholars are always in the Frontline right from the time of shah waliullah(ra)
Brother Mohammad Arshad, do you come from an Ahle Hadith background?
Who was the second inspiration out of two he mentioned?
Why is the video not complete?
Was he Maulana Maudoodi?
Yes he might have cut that part because it will will not suit his party
The first two scholars who's books made him convinced on Islam was Syed qutub and molana madhudi
It is not maududi mentioned on his website
FOURTH POINT
I have been accused of getting my Islaamic “tarbiyah” from the likes of Muhammad Qutub and Maududi, and that I encourage people on my website to read specific books of his! Subhaanallaah, how things can be distorted to fit the desires! I mentioned in an interview on how I accepted Islaam, twenty-eight years ago, that before I was Muslim I was involved in the university Communist movement. Then I read a book by Muhammad Qutb and another by Maududi, which heightened my interest about Islaam (as a NON MUSLIM). Does this mean I received my Islamic tarbiyah from them, or that I aid their minhaj and mistakes? This is indeed tahreef (distortion).
And for the record, I do not consider Maududi and Muhammad Qutb to be true scholars. I put the word scholars in quotes to stress this point. Though they are not scholars to be relied on for knowledge, as the scholars are alhamdulillaah available, many laymen consider them such.
Check this link
bilalphilips.com/reply-to-critics/
He is not "trained" by them indeed. He was influenced by them to learn Islam.
Dr philips said that, he was accused of being inspired by moudodi. He further added that he does not consider Modoudi a true scholar