2015 Chevy Tahoe & Suburban 0-60 MPH First Drive & Review
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 08. 2024
- ( www.TFLcar.com ) The 2015 Chevy Tahoe & Chevy Suburban are 4WD, three-row people haulers that will also tow your boat, horse traileror third wheel. In fact, the Chevrolet Suburban is the oldest nameplate in the world. In other words, that means it is the oldest vehicle with the same. In another accurate, fun and informative TFLca first drive review, Roman drives and reviews these classic body-on-frame SUV's to see how they drive, and in the process tests these big rigs to see how fast they will spring from 0-60 MPH.
Check us out on:
Facebook: ( / tflcar )
Twitter: ( / tflcar )
and now even Truck Videos on CZcams at:
The Fast Lane Truck ( / tflcar )
Are people too stupid to realize this is a FULLY LOADED Tahoe? These things come with a shitload of options. You can buy a Tahoe starting a 44k. People for years have been complaining about GMs quality. Better quality is going to come with a bigger price tag.
They put enough money in to make a interior for the Tahoe rather than the Silverado’s interior. LOOK AT THE EXPEDITION LOL
Why is there so many hate comments my dad has the Tahoe it rides so nice. My mom friend said she rented the suburban and love it.
So if you didn’t ride in the suv don’t hate because you don’t know what your talking about.
$71k for a Tahoe... are you shitting me??? A couple years ago you could get an Escalade ESV for less than that. No worries though, its a Chevy so it should depreciate by about $30-35k in the first 3 years...
Slash396 Nah more so just common sense. I'll admit GM is putting out some better quality vehicles(probably because they are using more foreign design and parts), but compare the resale value to something like 5-10 year old Toyota or Infiniti vs an older GM and you'll see my point. You can go out and buy a practically new "used" Tahoe for $10-20k off sticker price. Plus there's the status symbol of the emblem on the car, shallow as it may be. Why would someone drop $50-60k on a Chevy when you could get something like a Lexus or a Benz for the same money?
92ASC and look at parts for a lexus or benz or look how much maintenance is for benz or lexus GM owns 80% of the market for a reason take you rice wagon loving ass some where else
yeah except Lexus' don't really require anything other than regular maintenance(oil change, filters, etc.) And plus lexus dealerships are among the top rated for customer service. It's like comparing Nordstrom to Walmart. And please show me factual evidence of your "GM owns 80% of the market" claim. Until you can please just stop talking.
So original with the ricer comment, love it. And you're entitled to your opinion, but I'll believe the customer satisfaction and reliability track record over some internet "pro lexus mechanic".
*+brian hampton* how can you call him a ricer when he mentioned lexus and mercedes? I dont think you know what a ricer is and who in their right mind would buy a suburban for 70k?
Why oh why is it only the haters that reply to these type of videos
They've gotten faster!! I like the improvements. Very impressive. (Except the price)
Test drove it. We are getting the Lincoln Navigator after driving the Yukons and Tahoes. Visually I thought the Yukon and Tahoe was nice inside and out. Rear seat is not good for bigger kids or adults in the Yukon or Tahoe where the Navigator definitely does. The floor height is cramped with the solid rear axle underneath in the Yukon and Tahoe, where in the Navigator your feet are not cramped because the Navigator has rear independent suspension. The Yukon and Tahoe doesn't have independent rear suspension so when you drive you notice that the vehicle doesn't have as good of a ride as the Navigator. Steering the Yukon and Tahoe took way more work but I did like the thick steering wheel where the Navigator steered effortlessly. Gas pedal on the Small V8 is so restricted to try and get good gas mileage. The 6.2 was well powered and didn't have the same lethargic gas pedal but on the Lincoln Navigator the throttle response was not just amazing but powerful across a larger power-band. I don't think the 6.2 would win zero to 60 nor do I think the 6.2 could out pull a full trailer as well.
Everyone gripping about the $70k need to keep in mind that this is the fully loaded edition that they're showing. Base starts at around $45k.
My father has 2004 Yukon that has the same engine as this one 5.3. His Yukon has 300k miles and it is still going strong. Those SUVs are reliable.
Totally agree! I have an 06 LT Tahoe pushing 190k miles... Long as you take care of your car, it will take care of you
Everyone keeps complaining that it costs $71,000. However, the base price for a Tahoe is about $44,600 and $47,300 for a Suburban. It's not too ridiculous and is only about 1 grand more expensive than last year's model.
Because for 71k you can buy a very nice luxury SUV such as a GL350, Lexus GX, Audi Q7. All of which sell for around 45k-50k. The new twins are great but fuel economy and resale value hurt them both. For 71k you might as well get the new Escalade, why would anyone buy a LTZ model?
My point was that you don't have to spend $71,000 on a Tahoe. Just because it has enough options and high-end trim levels doesn't mean you have to pay that much. A well-equipped Tahoe with leather and MyLink will cost about $55,000. While I admit it is a bit overpriced, it is still a good quality vehicle with a true, body on frame construction.
Those luxury SUVs that you mentioned are nice, but they're not full size truck-like vehicles and lack the interior capacity of the Tahoe/Suburban. They're crossovers, except for the Lexus. Also, if something breaks on those cars, it's very expensive to fix. I don't think the pricing is too unreasonable.
bro do the math..
compare of what options you want in the car and how much each of those packages costs from the dealership...
even if you want just one thing but not the whole package.. you still have to buy the whole package in order to get that one thing you want..
it would be more efficient if they would allow you as the buyer what you want and not want..because im sure 40% of the time there's something in the vehicles that almost nobody uses..lol
and that alone would make it more affordable..
Fordguy1997 Don't forget inflation either!!
Nik Berishaj brand new escalade cost 90k
Holy crap that's quiet. Always loved these vehicles for their ride comfort
Idk but in seeing many things the expedition came equipped with back when it was redesigned in 07.
Saw one in person on the 101 in SoCal. The pics don't do the truck justice, it's handsome IMO.
I can't figure out why you are driving over rocks and stuff. As long as it can get from the soccer game to the shopping centre, 99% of the buyers will be happy.
That's what crossovers are made for. This is a suv.
they want something to drive over anything whenever road conditions gets worse
like big potholes. feet of snow, or flooded roads..
thats why they suggest something more off-road capable because unlike driving pavement.. traction is more important..
Do people not understand. There's a reason that these sell and do well in north america, and thats cause some of us NEED them. Try hauling 5-7 people plus a trailer with any other vehicle than this. I love the styling imo. Love the vehicle
Finally someone else that understands
Friendly0Dan reason my parents have 2
I have to say that Chevrolet did a great job with the Suburban and Tahoe, especially with the speed, handling, and design.
I don't see why people are talking about the price tag. If you can't afford it or don't want to pay it don't freaking look at it go buy something else period.
You must be rich.
Here I am in 2024 shopping and they're still expensive used.
19mpg city is still pretty damn respectable for such a massive vehicle. Still pretty impressive numbers. For my money, however, I think I'd still have a Durango. I know there's not as much space in the 3rd row, but I don't think I'll be using it much. I mostly just love the look of the Durango more than the new Tahoe/Suburban. Also, even maxed, the Durango is comes way under the $70k mark. Like...way under. Still though, GM's new big SUVs seem solid. Nice job!
Indeed. I was pickled tink to see 17.5 average on the display during my 99% highway commute the other day. lol.
Durango has one big downside. Chrysler quality (or lack of)
Can't wait to get this for my family
Can't wait for the Escalade review
Love my 'burban but wish it came with front park assist, blind spot alert etc as standard. Thing is massive.
$70K for a Suburban is a little too expensive. You can buy a better SUV with more technology and features with that money.
man when i saw this video in the what to watch i got so excited. i have been wanting to see this thing in action.
I'm driving a 2012 Tahoe LTZ at the moment.. Just as soon as my local GM dealer gets the 2015 Tahoe in stock, I'll definitely trade in for an LTZ model. Beautiful!!
how’d you like it?
71k? Wow! Lol. Well...I can guarantee this truck won't be in my garage until 2018. Even then, it will be bought USED!
that's the LTZ they have a LS model for the income impaired
dbyranyesyesyes lol. Not impaired at all.just won't spend that much on anything but my home.
This a fully loaded 4wd model. Most people aren't going to need that, much less the 4wd. You'll most likely still be able to get a nice loaded one for significantly less. If not, there's always the Equinox. Which is their entry level SUV.
Screamn4444 the equinox is too girly.
My sister has one xD
That looks so much better than the previous one
Am I the only one that actually like these cars?
+Aaronaitor Nope you are not! I want one. One day haha. :)
***** I'm starting to fall more toward the escalade (Which is kinda bad knowing how expensive it is) but this car still looks good, it sticks out on the road and it is soooo comfortable and fun inside.
+Aaronaitor The Escalade is nice too! And yea, it's even more pricey than the Suburban or Tahoe can be! I've been a fan of the Suburban ever since my family bought our 2005 LT model, and I was really impressed when I found out how long they've been in production! IT's such a nice smooth ride. I'd definitely consider an Escalade too! If I had the money haha. Do you like the Yukon?
***** Yeah I do like the Yukon, the Denali is like a discount escalade.
Definitely not! I've always loved big full-sized SUV's with a nice V8!
Of course I would mention this because of my username but Cadillac announced on its website that the MSRP for the 2015 Escalade starts at $71,695. Im aware that is a Standard model Escalade but the standard model even comes with more features than a loaded Tahoe or Suburban (and even Yukon/Yukon XL).
Now tell me why again one wouldnt go with an Escalade instead!?
caddyman07 maybe because of the heritage
Reliability
Reliability
I was very impressed when i saw both of these vehicles at the chicago auto show. You ca completly fold the third and second row seats flat with the touch of a button and even raise the third row back up. The interior is very nicely layed out and of high quality with even pannnel gaps. Very upscale. For people saying this is ugly, get your head out of the 80's. no ones going to buy that these days. i love all generations of chevy but this one is very clean and chiseled and luxurious. not PLASTICY like some of you had mentioned. Also the Forester is not even in the same class!
I love how people fight over brands as if they were getting paid. Buy the car that you like and can afford, and that's it. Who cares what other people think, it's not their money buying your vehicle.
Exactly! Who cares what they drive as long as they're happy? I don't like certain cars that people drive but I'm not gonna shit on them for it. If you wanna drive a smart car then go ahead, if you like muscle then go for it. The vehicle you drive shouldn't determine how "manly" you are. Drive whatever the hell you want!
***** I think it's funny how people complain saying American vehicles don't last long, but these trucks here average 250,000 miles.... And my Bimmer was constantly in the shop and the transmission went at 95,000 miles. That was a 06 5 series, now my lexus was amazing. But I think American made isn't bad. My mother in law has a Chevy cavalier, with 230,000 miles. And she still drives it. Not sure how it's still running but it is.
The head light knob looks almost exactly the same as the 4-wheel drive knob I see a problem with people mixing them up.
People with IQs that low cant afford them so it doesn't matter..
starting at 64k???? Is GM fucking high?? i can buy a fully loaded Corvette c7 Stingray and still not reach the starting price of the suburban.
The suburban starts at 47,300 according to Chevrolets website. Not 64,000
Chris Sutera that makes more sense. the guy in this video needs to get his facts straight then.
50 at best but for a gm theyre nuts. Seventy thousand, thats german territory
SuperImmunologist ya 70 grand you can pretty much get an a8 or xj for that money
Nicolas Bocchino maybe an escalade the new one but the gm era i remember was 99-06 escalade gmc and chevy. and the escalade at most was in the 50,s
Wow, 71k? My 08 ltz was 60 fully loaded, and this is a good 10k more. Then how much is the denali? Not to talk of the esv? Why GM?
All of those added Safety Features such as "lane departure warning" "adaptive cruise control" "parking sensors" backup camera", all cost extra. Then there's the HIDs and led running lights, which alone are over $1000. I'm pretty sure the 08 had none of that.
75k for the Denali, i'm a dealer
A LOT of magic can happen on those fold down seats! are you crazy? haha!
I sat in one at a car show, IT WAS SICK and much better than any other high end SUV there(range rover, porche suv, and the new grand Cherokee). It worth the money if you have it.
True, sitting in it feels amazing
Love love love my Suburban. I will keep it forever no matter what else I get. :)
i'd prefer the previous generation tahoe....these look hideous
70k? Damn, my 99 Tahoe lt 4x4 brand new was 37k.
they only cost about 24k to make but people will pay 70k so they keep raising prices
Harrison Conyers Oh absolutely man, its crazy but people will pay that.
You could buy a 02 in great condition for 10k and put a ton of money in it to make it extremely luxurious and then still have enough gas money for a lifetime left over
And I guarantee you it would run longer too
Harrison Conyers My 99 has 259,000 on the clock and the motor is just now starting to wear. Luckily it wore out because of a faulty oil cooler hose sold by "doorman". Needless to say my dipstick has metal shavings that look like tiny hairs on the end of it. So now doorman will be buying me a new motor! I wish they still issued the 350. Such a built motor!
what a beautiful pair of trucks! just wish they changed the silverado as much as they did these two.
I just got a chevrolet suburban ltz. I love it. People ask me why did I get one when it's just me and 25 years old.lol I just say get one and you'll see. :-)
I have a 2010 Lincoln Naviagtor L and wow it has the front park assist and already has the power fold flat 3rd row I am surprised that the suburban just now have that!
Half of these features you could get stock in a Citroën C3 back in '05. Nothing new.
For all of you guys saying 71K? Might as well
But your dream Corvette..
People don't usually look to buy these unless they have a Big family like mine. Fords are nice yes, but the technology in those things have not changed in the last 10 years... I honestly wouldn't care of I got a ford or a Chevy, but were I am from in Texas, Chevrolet is a lot more popular, so I am little more biased because of OnStar and keeping my family safe on long road trips, being able to unlock and lock my car from my phone, remote start it and get diagnostics!.
But I respect everyone's opinions about there pick of the bunch. It's just like being republican or democratic.. It usually steams from what your family is, my family has Always had a Chevrolet since I was a kid, my best friend has a ford, yeah it's nice I do like the exterior, and they drive nice, but I am not a ford kinda guy.
I like Chevrolet because of there looks, more appealing to my opinion, but everyone's is different. In the long run, there both safe cars and get you from point A to B.
Even though the price seems ridiculous, it's understandable if you look at the facts. A base Suburban LS 2WD starts at $48,295; but comes standard with tri-zone climate control, rear-view camera, parking sensors, and remote start; these are options that would have been on a $40,000 truck a 5-10 years back. Not to mention the interior quality has been significantly improved compared the previous models plastic interior. The loaded LTZ model that runs $70,000 comes with coil springs, magnetic ride control, and adaptive cruise control; in 2014, you could only get these options on the Escalade, which would run you around $70,000. My question is, what does the Escalade and Denali trucks have to offer now? GM's strategy in terms of luxury has been Chevy, GMC, GMC Denali, then Cadillac. With their new Tahoe and Suburban creeping into the Escalade's market, what will the Cadillac have to offer and what will it cost? My opinion and from what the feedback says, Chevy's high price, loaded Suburban is going to scare away a lot of buyers. People who bought the Escalade before may not have minded spending the $70k on a truck, but they were spending it on a Cadillac, not a Chevy. Salaries haven't increased that much if at all, Chevy buyers aren't going to justify the price raise. Maybe some Escalade buyers will trickle down to the Suburban depending on the cost of the Esclade, but time will tell.
Umm this is a truck and belongs on tfl truck not car.
Over 70k for that? Why? For that price you could get a much nicer SUV from a luxury or sporty brand that has a nicer interior, better gas mileage, is more fun to drive, and doesn't look like a heifer.
All you people complaining about price need to get a grip on reality. Especially if you're only argument is how much more expensive these are then previous models. These Tahoe are nicer, better quality vehicles in every way compared to old GM trucks. People bitched to GM when they made plastic filled vehicles so they made the quality of everything better. That comes with a price tag. If you people really think they could positively overhaul an entire platform and not bump price you're idiots.
I recently saw one of these new Tahoes in my town. To my surprise, I really didn't think Chevy would start selling them so early in 2014. I guess "the earlier the better" suits everybody's situation. lol
GM makes this Suburban in a Fleet/ commerical series without the electronics that keep the GM shops employed.
Once again, GM has overstepped its bounds with a $70K Chevrolet that has more than 2 doors. The writing is on the wall when, once again, it will be on it's knees begging Uncle Sugar for another a bail out. There is just too much competition from the foreign auto makers in this segment that offer more for less. Fools.
Well it’s still the #1 selling big suv. I guess the only fool is you now. 😂😂😂😂
$71,000 ??? thats a steep price, you can get a absolutely loaded ford expedition king ranch EL for $54,000, now im not a fan of one or the other but at the same time i don't think having 100 different electronic toys in one car (specifically Chevrolet) is good
Well 71K for a fully loaded one.
this car costs more than an escalade i could buy right now. plus it is not even the "high country." i feel like if i know anything about this car, this video is a waste of time. tell me something a Gm rep couldnt tell me over the phone if gm are going to go through the effort of flying you out and driving the vehicle. help them help you. how much do you suspect the top model will cost if the ltz is already 72 grand? also i hate to bring this into the mix, but even with some options considered, who wants a tahoe or suburban over a GL? and now that the tahoe is priced similarly to a luxury car, why buy a chevy badge over a merc badge, even though the merc is foreign
The ltz is the top model. The suburban starts at 47k. That tahoe starts a 44k
Rtvoll
the ltz used to be the top model silverado as well.
this isn't a review btw its just a 1st impressions video btw
there's no way it would cost more than an escalade
a fully loaded escalade would go between 90k- 100k
it's a nice suv; great for family
but one thing i despise with gm trucks are that they overprice them upfront.. which is preposterous...
lower your price man and they would sell out easy..
after all more americans prefer an suv these days
it's the new market..
this should range imo between 30k - 45k...
*****
"new market" 40 years ago, people are just getting back into them again, number of sales is increasing to get closer to what they were 14 years ago. costs the same as a base escalade, which kills the point. you are correct
Competitor ? Mercedes GL , AUDI Q7 , BMW X5 ... I would clearly take a MB GL rather then that...
Yeah well the X5 has a third row, not has much room I would agree I don't know about the Q7 , My wife has a new GL and the third row get the same amount that the Suburban, the land cruiser is a good compitor but I prefer the diesel engine of the MB, it would be nice feature for the 2016 model on GM models .
***** the Land cruiser is NOWHERE near as nice, or come with as many features, or get as much fuel economy and room.
kirbyswarp The Land Cruiser doesn't compete with the GM twins, it's more of a competitor for the Range Rover or Mercedes G-Class. That trio of SUVs is more about off road capability while the Surburban/Tahoe is more of a people hauler/tow rig.
Well the G-Class is a capable off-roader with the air suspension , its better for towing and going on a famely camping trip, then lets says a range rover witch is awesome off-road , really on road but maybe less has a tow truck even taugh it can tow a lot.
2:32 that bridge is in Sacramento (also from the bridge scene in bad grandpa)
Man, I just see things that can go wrong. I will keep my 1999 GMC Suburban and my 1979 Chev K20 Custom Deluxe..Over $70,000?!?!?!?! NOT ME! I can fully rebuild both previously mentioned rigs for much less than $70,000 Dang GM, You guy are freaking nuts!!
Is it just me or do 2007-2014 Tahoes have more interior room. especially in the front and rear when it comes to shoulder and leg room or is it just me??? O_O
The extra legroom was probably what GM was aiming for, I believe that the suburban and Tahoe are longer than before.
It depends on your height. They look big on the outside, but 2nd row legroom sucks. I'm 6'4 and it feels small to me. The Sequoia, Armada, and Qx56/Qx80 have the most room. The front Tahoe seats do slide back further than older models, but it also kills 2nd row legroom.
Roman & Nathan, great stuff guys. I love your videos. I watch all of them for no reason... Lol
Can you guys evaluate 2014 Highlander a little more (such as 0-60, snow, and off-road performance)?
Thank you guys keep up the good work!
The only NICE improvement I will give Chevy credit for on this new model is the new location of the rear wiper. Its hidden up in the top of the airfoil/brakelight assembly.
Ford has had back windows open like that for a long time my old 2003 explorer does it and my 2010 escape does it's nice for fishing. But someday I want a suburban or tahoe they seem reliable and the whole sqaud fits in each row comfortably.
I'm in love with the wheels!!! I want them for my OBS Chevy truck
Great truck and great review, Roman.
I think the Old Tahoe in 2009 had the Optional 6.2 (Corvette Engine) with a 3.73 rear end option and the 6 speed Manual shifting Trans.
That one was quick for a Big SUV, 5.8 - 6.2 seconds to 60mph.
One surprised me @ the light, I was like what the heck they got in that thing.
Not for 70 grand. GMC has lost their mind !
Yeah seriously. But the first two models are only 1k more than the 2014 models if no one is looking for the high end model.
Nice looking truck but seems quite a bit overpriced!!! It doesn't seem like that many years ago when 40,000 for a GM SUV would get you a nicely equipped model.
Tge most I'd pay Is 40k
***** maybe a 2011
It has been 70 grand for 8 years
I just bought a 9 year old 2009 Tahoe Hybrid 4x4 for less than 7k, this truck had an MSRP North of 54k when new in 2009.
If you want a 4x4 Tahoe and do not have much cash, why not just buy a used one? They are plentiful and dirt cheap in the used car market and if you shop well you can get a great deal. Even a 2009 model Tahoe is a marvel of modern engineering and design. It weighs almost 6200 lbs so i got in for around a dollar per lb. That is going to be my goal in the future when buying vehicles to pay around a dollar per lb. I should be able to get into a used econobox (aka: penalty box) for practically nothing. LMFAO
02:13, my 00 expedition has the opening glass, plus the rear windshield has a much bigger opening. Also, that looks like an expensive rear windshield replacement in case it does break. One step forward, two steps back
They need to modernize the design of the steering wheel tbh
That glass lift hatch was already on the highlander. Took a while for other manufacturers to catch on.
It was also the at the last three generations of suburban, and before that they rolled down
Wow. 70k is a significant price increase. For the last generation, the range topping LTZ barely pushed past 50k.
The price is actually quite the same. Back in 2010 a Yukon XL (Equivalent to a Suburban) went for 70k brand new. I don't know why everyone is complaining about the price. 2011 Escalade --> 111k.
I have one of these in NYC. I can say it is very comfortable to ride in but I have never driven it. In New York City I have a driver because the traffic is way to crazy and parking is a nightmare here. The backseat is very spacious. Plenty of room for passengers and there is plenty of room for bags in the back.
Dean Acheson I had a 2011 Tahoe before this one. It felt comfortable to me. No complaints. My driver likes these vehicles so I buy it. I like that they are large and roomy and not too flashy. I always get black with deep tinted windows and that way it looks little more demure and doesn't attract too much attention. I had an Escalade and it was stolen and I had a Jaguar and it was vandalized.
I really hope the 3rd row on the Suburban was improved. We had a 2011 Suburban drive us to the airport, and the third row was so much tighter compared to our 2011 Expedition EL. It had barely any more room in the 3rd row than our other car, a 2010 Explorer.
I would like to see a Tahoe vs Expedition video once you can get your hands on one of the new Expeditions.
The expedition has more legroom in the 3rd row and it almost has same rear cargo space as the Suburban and that is not even the Expedition L. Idk what GM was thinking the previous Tahoe generations had good rear cargo space this year 2013 to 19s they made the Tahoe smaller more cramped up and uncomfortable
I wonder if they offer a second and third row sunroof in these? If not then they really should, it is a nice feature on the Mercedes GL-Class.
Welll....I am planning suburban for my first car..... j know the price is high tho but I like it a lot. The new engine that makes so much better gas milage
Such a nice SUV.
$71,090 as tested MSRP?!
Subaru introduced that "gauges starting check process" in their cars a few years ago... Now every car maker literally COPIED that and want to have it in their cars...
Besides that, it is good to see GM finally did something for the Tahoe... I was tired of those fake wood dashboard trim insertions in the interior.
would have liked it a bit more with the silverado front end
I'll take a Tahoe over an Expedition, way nicer than the Expedition ever was. And still traditional body on frame and rwd.
They all look better than their older counterparts. Props to GM for making 6 trucks out of 1 really. Tahoe, Suburban, Yukon, Yukon XL, Yukon Denali, Escalade. At least they all come with cylinder deactivation. But my god are they pricey.
@splewy You ever think maybe they buy them for winter conditions?
I like reviews when they actually have the cars and trucks do the talking......
I wish they woukd made more differentiating factor between the tahoe and suburban, like just a few little tweeks for example headlights taillights and grill, just to give each one of then a uniquer look, just how they did to the sierra and silverado
My grandpa is still waiting for his, they couldn't find 18' standard wheels. lol
If you're going to spend $71k on a loaded suburban or Tahoe then:
1. You're dumb
2. You might as well just buy the escalade that has the same base price
3. Better yet, you might as well just buy an Infiniti Qx80, a Mercedes GL, or a range rover. Sheesh these new GM trucks are overpriced! Yes, I realize in this instance they're fully loaded but they're still $5-10k more than a loaded expedition or sequoia and by the time you get the options you want on these they'll probably still be well over $50k. No thanks!
that price is crazy, my dads freind just bought a 2014 ram 3500 crew cab laramie diesel for 65.000$. what person would pay that for an suv
Tahoe and suburbans been around for a long time b/c they are reliable smoke as that.
I read that all Tahoe's (2015-2020) come standard with a G80 differential. Can anyone verify if that's true or not? Thanks.
70k for a Tahoe i think not
i could get a cherokee srt for less then that
My point exactly jeep goes faster looks better sounds better and for a single guy probably attracts females when they hear that hemi lol and the Tahoe is oftenly driven by women
That's a Tahoe LTZ with all of the options, very few people will buy that. It's a review vehicle, not a family hauler.
My mom had an 07 ltz but that brand new was around 50k but I'm just sayin why buy the Tahoe when for that price people will be more prone to buying an escalade
i hoping for a duramax engine for this family hauler!
Sure, why not. They did have a diesel in the Tahoe in the 90s.
71k?????
If it shared the Silverado front clip it would be mint.
I had got one after I seen the visor
I love it
Roman, why do you need to make it a priority to share what company flew your out to where in every video?
Are there right hand drive models of the Suburban ?
Never buying this model $70k Ha!. Stick with my 2007 Escalade, plus the 07-14 GM Models are much better, not all Boxy Style like a Range are something.
the 07-14 model Tahoes/Suburbans in me eyes are incredibly handsome trucks. They have a kind of big muscular look that no other vehicle has. These look like crappy prototypes that they were silly enough to build.
GM should start giving the Tahoe's and Suburbans with the option of Duramax.
iwuzheree look up duraburb you wont be disappointed
how do I deactivate the cylinder deactivation?
TFL! Really?! A full review of the suburban and not even mentioning fords new expedition as competition?
I'll keep my 2014 Dodge Durango, but these new Tahoe's do look better in person.
What else is there any the 60-80k for BIG haulers like the suburban, I know about the Cadillac escalade (long version think it's the ect)