How to Seek Truth - Nomological Networks of Cumulative Evidence (THE SAAD TRUTH_1696)
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 06. 2024
- This clip stems from an XSpaces session that I held on June 12, 2024: x.com/GadSaad/status/18009086...
#truth #science #evolution #metaanalysis #literaturereview #evidence #arguments #reason #logic #axiom #toys #socialization #evolutionarypsychology
References:
1) chapter 7 of The Parasitic Mind (www.amazon.com/Parasitic-Mind...)
2) psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-4...
3) journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/... (the teaser image stems from Figure 2 in this paper)
_______________________________________
My book The Saad Truth about Happiness: 8 Secrets for Leading the Good Life is available for order:
www.amazon.com/Saad-Truth-abo...
_______________________________________
To subscribe to my exclusive content on Twitter, please visit my bio at / gadsaad
_______________________________________
If you appreciate my work and would like to support it:
subscribestar.com/the-saad-truth
/ gadsaad
paypal.me/GadSaad
You can also click on the "Heart Thanks" icon immediately below the clip.
_______________________________________
My book The Saad Truth about Happiness: 8 Secrets for Leading the Good Life is available for order:
www.amazon.com/Saad-Truth-about-Happiness-Secrets/dp/1684512603
_______________________________________
To subscribe to my exclusive content on Twitter, please visit my bio at twitter.com/GadSaad
_______________________________________
If you appreciate my work and would like to support it:
subscribestar.com/the-saad-truth
patreon.com/GadSaad
paypal.me/GadSaad
You can also click on the "Heart Thanks" icon immediately below the clip.
_______________________________________
"Truth is always relative to the closed system it exists within. Existence is, in the strictest sense, a closed system. There are truths within existence that are true and there are truths within existence that are not true. Truth can only exist in a closed system and may or may not be true outside of that closed system, not therein. Truth is that which men and women convey through Voice and Word. One's offered truth may or may not be true. Truth and true are not the same word, and subsequently, truth and true are not the same thing. True is that which can be shown in words through at least one question and its exact answer. That which can be shown in words can subsequently be seen by all men and women.
In the closed system of the Catholic Church of four hundred years ago, the truth was that our planet was the centre of a geocentric planetary system. Galileo posited that our planet was a part of a heliocentric solar system and spent the last years of his life under house arrest as a consequence of going against the truth of the Church. The Church has since changed its truth to the heliocentric solar system model."
- Goho-tekina Otoko
thanks
I use the concept of nomological networks of cumulative evidence every day. When teaching my family practice patients about lifestyle modification I start with Plato's Republic. Then I include Charles Darwin's observations as well as many other examples from history. My philosophy of life has to find its foundation well before the era of political correctness.
The Godfather knocks the science out of the ballpark.
Social Media R3tards "I gots memes"
Dr. Saad, please publish a research paper on the likelihood of a nursing parent having the assigned gender at birth of "female." I've found this correlation to be striking.
So where are you going to see the end of the world Dr Saad?
I'm going to the beach to get a nasty tan and maybe see the mushroom cloud, if I live through the strike on the nearest cat. 1 nuclear target near me. It's only 20 miles away so it should be a fine spectacle (as they are heat welded to my face). I'll probably loot the vintage champagne for 'the thrill of it' beforehand, no sense going out sober or fearful.
Looking forward, man.
Truth is only one, and it remains true from all angles.
It's basically that.
"Truth is always relative to the closed system it exists within. Existence is, in the strictest sense, a closed system. There are truths within existence that are true and there are truths within existence that are not true. Truth can only exist in a closed system and may or may not be true outside of that closed system, not therein. Truth is that which men and women convey through Voice and Word. One's offered truth may or may not be true. Truth and true are not the same word, and subsequently, truth and true are not the same thing. True is that which can be shown in words through at least one question and its exact answer. That which can be shown in words can subsequently be seen by all men and women.
In the closed system of the Catholic Church of four hundred years ago, the truth was that our planet was the centre of a geocentric planetary system. Galileo posited that our planet was a part of a heliocentric solar system and spent the last years of his life under house arrest as a consequence of going against the truth of the Church. The Church has since changed its truth to the heliocentric solar system model."
- Goho-tekina Otoko
belief is the foundation for ecnarongi (spelt backwards) and would be a mistake
based & gigadatapilled
❤❤❤❤
Sometimes, separating the constants from the variables is very tricky.
We should make a wikipedia site to show the world of evidence.
I always wanted to do that.
Everything must be proven to be reproducible. Next to the example article, there will be a link to a list of articles that confirm it, articles that detract, and a plot of the dataspread across articles.
Overlord DVD
g
it feels like you would first and foremost need to champion evaluating data, have a third eye to detect not declared conflicts of interests, etc etc. otherwise it is garbage in, garbage out?! Not to refute your point, but as of recently, metastudies seem to contradict metastudies, people writing books on how there seems to be an attack on positions, by means of what one would call empirical evidence, but in a way to establish narrative. all sides point to the other and claim indecent motives, but both rely on "data" to prove their respective points, as well as to refute the points, of their respective opposition.
How does one know, when or why to rely on the presented data?
l