Critical Thinking: Arguments and non-Arguments
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 05. 2024
- In this lecture and discussion from his Fayetteville State University's Critical Thinking class, Dr. Sadler discusses what sort of structure sets of claims must have in order to be arguments. He distinguishes arguments from other non-argument sets of claims, including narratives and explanations. Portions of President Barack Obama's 2011 State of the Union speech are used to provide examples for the class.
You are a real teacher. One who actually cares. More of you!
Hi Gregory. Great lecture, thanks. I'm in the UK and while your examples are US specific, the gist of the content is still very relevant.
Quite simply, I taught the textbook. Actually, though, its very common in CT to distinguish between explanations and arguments.
Not all explanations are "conclusions regarding causation". I suppose for those that are, your objection would hold good. Generally, explanations do something different than argument
Great lecture! It is actually making sense to me now! The way you explain it makes it seem so simple. My professor just told us to read the textbook and the textbook didn't make any sense at all. I think I will actually do well in my class because of your videos! Thank you!!!!
Politicians don't have arguments, they just rant about what they want to happen and try and make you think it is good to agree with them.
The book he referred to is Moore and Parker's Critical Thinking, 8th ed, he has provided the link in the comments of the previous (first) video of the series.
thank you so much Dr. Sadler, you make it simple to understand. Don´t mind the "haters" on the comments, haha I´m enjoying your videos and even better applying this to my way of communicating and thinking. All the way from Mexico. Keep up the good work Dr.
This guy is a great teacher. Thank you.
+Reid Luccasen You're welcome!
i like your teaching style. Thank you so much :)
Great Professor! Very clear lecture.
great lecture, thanks.
This is a good video because you stuck to the point. For example, even when you were talking about 'explanations' at 15:00 you showed how they are NOT arguments.
Man.. i feel sorry for this wonderful teacher.
I appreciate the response. I'm still a little puzzled by the claim "Not all explanations are 'conclusions regarding causation". Can you give some examples please? Also, which textbook do you use to teach this course? Thanks.
Thanks for this lecture. Could I ask about this book . Or reference that you referred in lecture
Awesome lecture
Thank you :)
Again, thank you for the videos! Curious....could you send me a message as to what book you were/are using? I'm sure it is not the same text that we are using however I'm curious :) Thanks!
I can’t believe i just watched your first class and I’m alreading spotting bullshtters on the internet. Hope to learn some more
May I ask, what textbook is being used for this class? I really enjoy the way Dr Sadler presents his lessons.
thank you for pointing that out... I say it all the time.
Understand this much more than when my professor lectured.
@Sulatanov you're quite welcome -- much more is now available on my personal channel
Perfect, thank you.
Very true -- all of that. My family is mostly people in the trades
nice video. Very helpful
about his statement : "any american can go to college, but not in France or Germany, where you must be cleaver enought to be selected"
Exact ! but Wrong on the financial aspect.
In France, College costs nothing, and in USA ( if my informations are right )
you must be rich enought to pay for your college studies.
So, selection by intellectual capability in France,
versus selection by financial means in USA.
Followup question: Why did you choose to make a dichotomy between explanations and arguments? Explanations are conclusions regarding causation. (I typed this because I had a question). Conclusions are parts of arguments. Therefore, explanations are parts of arguments as well.
i ve had a head injury and ever since my social judgmnt i s down the drain---- why ??
I actually think that the last arguments premise is that the world has changed with the conclusion that it should challenge us. The supporting claims were the premises he used.
Thanks..very useful:)
still feeling confuse in difference between Argument and Explanation. please any empirical example beside the exerpts Dr. Sadler is disgussing?
propose a topic...
Does anyone know the name of the textbook he’s working from?
a concise introduction to logic, 13th edition, hurley
From the pledge of allegiance: "And to the republic for which it stands"
is it too radical to have people take critical thinking classes before they are allowed to vote??
And I'd go on to say that although many Americans have a college education, they still are not critical thinkers and base many of their beliefs on superstition and supernatural beliefs, rather than on rational reasoning and evidence. I point to the number of religious people in the US. I am making the assumption that the value of an education is in your ability to reason, not your ability to make money. Unfortunately, many Americans think that moneymaking trumps reasoning ability.
Great lecture. Opened my eyes to my mistakes. Speaker is good too. I just don't understand why he has to pick up that cup all the time. What for?
+Abelardo N. Navarro It was an 8 AM class, 5 years ago. It's probably my coffee cup, I would guess
That would have been a killer idea!
Explanation: "Dr. Sadler is upset because his class doesn't understand the concept of democracy." Argument: "Because his class doesn't understand the concept of democracy, Dr. Sadler is probably upset."
THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT DEMOCRACY IS
Hohoho, this guy is a ton of fun with his prejudices.
It is actually considered Constitutional federalism :)
what is the difference ?
democracy = from δῆμος (dêmos) "people" and κράτος (kratos) "power"
republic = a form of government in which the country is considered a "public matter" (Latin: res publica)
these are WIKIPEDIA définitions, which both lead to understand :
" people runs the country " , but what do YOU mean ?
You should rent out the space on your coffee cup for ads, because then you could save up the money to buy a jet pack.
a republic is part of the federalism. learn your government. we have multiple branches. the republic format is through the senate, but could also be referring to the house, and legislative branch as a whole, which was was deemed the most important by the founders. Regardless, the pledge was made in the late 1800s, and although adopted in the 1940's, does not necessarily provide any evidence that the United states is a republic. If you would simply look up the definitions for each, you could see.
Good luck
John Boner XD
🤣
The information is good. His teaching style... meh, not so much.
Did you even watch this video? lol. make a claim, support it with evidence ;)
The united states is clearly a Constitutional federalism, if you care to remain ignorant of that fact, so be it.
Red States.
What does democracy mean? /crickets.. This country is a mess.
We still use blackboards at Harvard. Good luck!
good teacher. though i think he's unintentionally bullying his students into wanting to participate less.
I like lectures where the professor is more focused on giving a lecture and is passionate about a subject instead of asking a thousand questions. OF COURSE THEY KNOW WHAT DEMOCRACY IS. Do they need to tell you that? no. Move on. Watch Dr. Sapolsky's lectures and you'll know what I mean.