Systematic mapping of the literature: a key method for literature synthesis.

Synthesizing the ever-growing academic literature is an important skill in academia and science in general. Most will know about narrative reviews and meta-analysis; but perhaps systematic mapping is a less well-known option. I explain the difference among these three approaches, how a systematic mapping is done, and what you can do with the results.
#science #research #phd #phdlife #searchterms
Matthias Rillig, professor of ecology at Freie Universität Berlin, talks about life in academia.
Interested in our lab? visit rilliglab.org.
Follow on twitter for life in academia content: @AcademLife
Follow on twitter for ecology content: @mrillig
Find me on mastodon: @[e-mail]
LinkedIn: / rillig
Want a particular topic covered? Please add your suggestion to the comments!

[@mrillig]

Synthesizing the ever-growing academic literature is an important skill in academia and science in general. Most will know about narrative reviews and meta-analysis; but perhaps systematic mapping is a less well-known option. In this video, I explain the difference among these three approaches, how a systematic mapping is done, and what you can do with the results.
Have you heard of this? Have you tried this out? Please let me know in the comments! 😀

[@tanvirshovon3482]

Thanks for this wonderful video on a critical topic.

[@mrillig]

thanks!!

[@sarkaljyakhwa4088]

Wondering if this video was there 6 months ago, life would have been so easy. Thanks!

[@mrillig]

Better late than never! :)

[@marianachrispim7213]

I missed the integrative literature review, which is a valuable option

[@mrillig]

How's that different from a narrative review?