Thank you great work,, In my opinion the weber test is better to use clinically to identify the side of the problem,, not to differentiate between the conductive and sensorineural hearing loss, as that is difficult in real life. The Rinne test is better test to differentiate between the two problem,, And as many people said; low frequency tuning fork (e.g., 500 Hz). Many thanks
Thank you great work,,
In my opinion the weber test is better to use clinically to identify the side of the problem,, not to differentiate between the conductive and sensorineural hearing loss, as that is difficult in real life. The Rinne test is better test to differentiate between the two problem,,
And as many people said; low frequency tuning fork (e.g., 500 Hz).
Many thanks
thx a lot, helpful in my study
1. It's pronounced "vee-ber" (minor point)
2. It's done at or close to the hairline
3. As mentioned it's the wrong size tuning fork
webers is done usually with 512 Hz tuning forks and it is NOT a vibratory sense assessment
thanks!
please add details concerning interpretation. apart from that, great:)
thanks
thank uuuuuu
thanks!