"I sued Delta Airlines because they sold me a ticket to New Jersey, I went there- and it SUCKED" No matter how many times I hear this song, this line will ALWAYS make me laugh out loud.
The fact that you can legitimately thrash and headband to this song really emphasis Weird Al's musical understanding without such a absurd and hilarious premise this song would not sound out of place on a Rage album.
Bodine v. Enterprise High School: Nineteen-year old falls through skylight while trying to steal gymnasium floodlights, sues school for injuries and wins. This is one of many court cases where a criminal sued the victim and one. It's really dumb, but sometimes it really does happen.
The coffee being spilled in the lap is definitely Stella Liebeck, but he's changed it from McDonalds to Starbucks. "I'll sue ya if you even look at me funny" could be a reference to Prince, who constantly rejected Als offers to parody his music. At one point when they were both supposed to attend the American Music Awards, Prince had his lawyers send a letter to Al, telling him to not even look at Prince in the eye.
Can we just stop for a moment and admire how awesomely he parodied Rage Against the Machine and what I can only guess as being a Bulls On Parade-inspired track? They even included a Tom Morello-like dude complete with his Arm the Homeless guitar!
Reminds me of a broadcast of an Adventures in Odyssey program, a lawyer won a lawsuit so spectacularly that he became so in-demand that he couldn’t take on every client that approached him so he got sued for that
@@drewbaker2336 oh man, I never thought I'd come across someone who also grew up with adventures in odyssey. Though I don't remember that episode. But it could be because it's been years since I listened to the program.
@@drewbaker2336 Bart actually did threaten to sue him after they... Technically won, I guess.. Wonder what the writers would think of this song... That episode came out in 1995.
It is sad though that the coffee lawsuit was referenced here. I really hope most people know the truth about that lawsuit by now. It wasn't frivolous, that elderly woman had 3rd degree genital burns. I'd sue McDonalds too.
The truth is that she chose to place a 180 degree cup of coffee (in a paper cup) between her legs while being a passenger in a car. She spilled the cup into her lap. Her attorney argued that since is was hotter than a "normal cup of coffee" (175 degrees) McDonalds was negligent. Her injuries were real and sad but it wasn't McDonalds fault. Regardless of how painful an accident is, accepting responsibility, rather than blaming others for your choices, is the right thing to do. That's the whole point of this parody.
@@roses2155 two things: according to the official investigation, a difference of 5 degrees lowers the time to suffer third degree burns from 12+ seconds down to 3. and the coffee was 20 degrees hotter than it should've been, not 5 like you claimed. seems so weird to me that you would pick the literal poster child of misrepresented lawsuits to defend? in any case, the right thing to do is doing even basic research on what you're trying to correct people over, Rose
@@roses2155 "The coffee was not just “hot,” but dangerously hot. McDonald’s corporate policy was to serve it at a temperature that could cause serious burns in seconds. Mrs. Liebeck’s injuries were far from frivolous. She was wearing sweatpants that absorbed the coffee and kept it against her skin. She suffered third-degree burns (the most serious kind) and required skin grafts on her inner thighs and elsewhere. Liebeck’s case was far from an isolated event. McDonald’s had received more than 700 previous reports of injury from its coffee, including reports of third-degree burns, and had paid settlements in some cases. Mrs. Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. But McDonald’s never offered more than $800, so the case went to trial. The jury found Mrs. Liebeck to be partially at fault for her injuries, reducing the compensation for her injuries accordingly. But the jury’s punitive damages award made headlines - upset by McDonald’s unwillingness to correct a policy despite hundreds of people suffering injuries, they awarded Liebeck the equivalent of two days’ worth of revenue from coffee sales for the restaurant chain. That wasn’t, however, the end of it. The original punitive damage award was ultimately reduced by more than 80 percent by the judge." TL;DR McDonald's knowingly brewed their coffee to a temperature that could _seriously damage someone within seconds_ AND HAD ACTUALLY INJURED HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE BEFORE THIS and *she won her case* , the dispute was the SETTLEMENT NOT WHO WAS AT FAULT Hot coffee SHOULD NOT cause serious injuries just because you spill it on yourself!
If anyone's wondering what the "original" is its kind of a medley of a few Rage Against The Machine songs, mainly Bombtrack with elements of Killing In The Name, Know Your Enemy and Bulls On Parade thrown in.
0:00 to 0:12 = Bombtrack & Guerrilla Radio. 0:13 to 0:26 = Bombtrack. 0:27 to 1:10= Bulls on Parade & Wake Up. 1:11 to 1:21 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 1:22 to 1:34 = Bombtrack. 1:35 to 1:46 = Know Your Enemy. 1:47 to 2:30 = Bulls on Parade & Wake Up. 2:31 to 3:02 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 3:03 to 3:16 = Killing in the Name, Freedom & Bullet in the Head. 3:17 to 3:51 = Bullet in the Head & Wake Up.
Do people in Japan also sue sometimes? wonder if there was a lawsuit against the people that does the Pokemon Anime for that one episode and possible the news for showing the same scene again.
I never order home delivered Pizza because it is an abuse of power. My power. I don't want to rule the World. I don't want slaves. I can make my own bloody pizza. Fukc me!
sorry, gravity is a governmental instiution that is paid for to make you stay to the ground, it is 100% legal for them to do this, sorry, please contact your local government for more information
Why is that nobody who even understands what Fine Bros was trying to is making jokes about them, yes they were trying to own that industry on youtube but they were going to provide resources and views, it was basically a huge business deal that due to the numbers of uneducated people on youtube fell down immediately.
It’s a “style parody.” Sometimes he parodies a band’s sound without copying any specific themes or riffs from them. “Dog Eat Dog” is a Talking Heads style parody. “Dare to Be Stupid” is a Devo style parody. “Germs” is a Nine Inch Nails style parody. Sometimes it’s hard to tell. Is “You Don’t Love Me Anymore” a style parody of Extreme, or is it a full original? “Where’s Johnny” turned out to be a specific song parody but until I heard the song it was parodying, I thought it was a Scritti Politti style parody.
I'd like to take a moment to appreciate that this mad lad went back to his 14 year old music video and added 4k resolution. Like, could have reuploaded it to get some more view rev or something but nah, just went and added a 4k option to the original bloody upload.
0:01 to 0:11 = Bombtrack & Guerrilla Radio. 0:12 to 0:22 = Bombtrack. 0:23 to 0:27 = Killing In The Name. 0:28 to 1:10= Bulls on Parade & Wake Up. 1:11 to 1:21 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 1:22 to 1:34 = Bombtrack. 1:35 to 1:45 = Know Your Enemy & Take The Power Back. 1:46 to 2:29 = Bulls on Parade & Wake Up. 2:30 to 2:39 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 2:40 to 2:51 = Bombtrack. 2:52 to 3:01 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 3:02 to 3:17 = Guerrilla Radio, Killing in the Name & Bullet in the Head. 3:18 to 3:51 = Bullet in the Head, Guerrilla Radio, Take the Power Back & Wake Up.
This is the best RATM song never made by RATM. Did tom or anyone from the band ever publicly comment on this song? Al is a seriously good musician and this works as a great original song.
@@scottdoesntmatter4409 That's because they, like many Leftists, have been indoctrinated by Marxists. Step one of the "Four Steps for Communist Ideological Subversion" (Yuri Bezmenov, 1985) Demoralization - this is a process which can take about 15-30 years to perform (a generation). *During this stage, the moral fibre and integrity of the country is put into question, thereby creating doubt in the minds of the people. To do so, manipulation of the media and academia is required to influence young people.* As the younger generation embraces new values, such as Marxism and Leninism, the older generation slowly loses control simply through attrition. *Again, true facts no longer matter during this stage, but rather creating perceptions are of paramount importance.* Communism and Religion Abolished - all religious and metaphysics is rejected. Engels and Lenin agreed that religion was a drug or “spiritual booze” and must be combated. To them, atheism put into practice meant *a “forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.”* Eliminating American exceptionalism, fundamental change of national identity, structural deconstruction of foundational principles, elimination of religion. *Embedding a new societal design upon the psyche of generations through ideological academia, peer pressure by elites upon academics and society to convince that prior values were inherently flawed, racist, prejudiced etc. National identity is diluted with aspersions toward historical references. National History is re-written, re-defined, and molded to fit the new intended behavioral model and create the new values.* *“[T]he useful idiots, the leftists who are idealistically believing in the beauty of the Soviet socialist or Communist or whatever system,* when they get disillusioned, they become the worst enemies. That’s why my KGB instructors specifically made the point: never bother with leftists. Forget about these political prostitutes. Aim higher. [...] They serve a purpose only at the stage of destabilization of a nation. *For example, your leftists in the United States: all these professors and all these beautiful civil rights defenders. They are instrumental in the process of the subversion only to destabilize a nation. When their job is completed, they are not needed any more.* They know too much. Some of them, when they get disillusioned, when they see that Marxist-Leninists come to power-obviously they get offended-they think that they will come to power. That will never happen, of course. *They will be lined up against the wall and shot.”*
While most are bogus, the one about spraging his ankle while he's robbing your place has really happened before. And people have won settlements for getting hurt while robbing people's homes. Disgusting that the justice system rewards criminals like that.
Actually, most of them ate true, they are only worded differently. For instance the part with frappuino and StarBucks. In the original lawsuit the woman sued McDonalds because, while she was holding the cup in between her legs in a car, she spilled hot coffee on her lap and got second and third degree burns.
My five-year-old son burned down my apartment after playing with matches, so of course I sued MTV. What, you expect me to take responsibility for what my kids watch? That's the TV's job.
That gives me an idea! I should sue Twitch for not letting me use the chat unless I sign in via FaceBook! I don't have a FaceBook account, nor do I want one! Thanks!
I think most of us can agree, suing Delta Airlines for selling a ticket to New Jersey and suing Nieman Marcus for putting up Christmas decorations out of season are valid lawsuits.
This is an original song. Al studies an artists enire body of work and then writes an oridinal song in that style. Al wrote this song in the style of Rage against the Machine.
"If I sprain my ankle, while I'm robbing your place, if I hurt my knuckles, when I punch you in the face,'' Sounds like the UK except you actually go to jail AND get sued.
To those who discuss the Liebeck v. McDonalds case (1984) below, Ms. Liebeck became the poster child for American lawsuits gone haywire--unnecessarily so. There was great vitriol and spite for this poor soul. Most people don't realize that this martyr (she became one in that case) is responsible for the cup holders in our cars today. Thanks to her bravery, we don't have to risk the same, painful fate--and YES (!) it was quite painful. I saw pictures of her THIRD degree burns, which required she undergo an operation. At the time of her painful and quite serious injuries, there was NO place to put the cup due to the car-design (and car designs, in general). Moreover, the car was parked--NOT moving. She was the passenger. Originally, she ONLY wanted McD's to pay her medical bills--AND LOWER THE COFFEE TEMPERATURE, which was HOTTER than industry STANDARDS. That's it! They arrogantly refused to respect her wishes, and she pressed on. McD's REFUSED to lower the temperature notwithstanding the fact that HUNDREDS of people ALREADY gave McD's notice that they were injured during a given time--when the injuries were recorded. And, by the way, NO, Ms. Liebeck did NOT gain millions of dollars. A trial court judge reduced her original verdict amount--given to her at the hands of a horrified jury to ONLY $640,000 (having seen the pictures, you know what I mean by "only"). It was a David v. Goliath case of arrogance--and a concerned citizen who refused to just knuckle under. Yes, folks, this poor lady pressed on because she didn't want to see ANYONE ELSE suffer that fate. Rather than enviously looking at her with disdain, perhaps people should educate themselves on the true facts behind the Liebeck v. McDonald's story. Thank you, Ms. Liebeck. May you RIP.
Pedro DuhHusky Hi Pedro. Thanks for your most inquisitive reply. For a company to need changes due to people getting hurt is equivocated with negligence according to Tort law. Thus, as a matter of law, McDonalds would be held to be negligent if they were found to be selling coffee that is significantly hotter than industry standards. A company is held to a reasonableness standard. If they are found to be selling coffee that is unreasonably hot--hotter than industry standards--then they are found to be negligent. Moreover, if the company has had notice of hundreds (that we know of at a certain time) of people getting burned and they refused to change it, that is a problem. (People will continue getting hurt without changes.) Importantly, in personal injury law, there are damages for pain and suffering. Admittedly, this is balanced against the negligence of the Plaintiff. However, where a product is dangerous enough that many people are getting hurt with it--and the company has received notice after notice, such that they are well-aware of the volume of injuries--then it becomes a problem for the company (this can be seen in products liability cases also, with dangerous and defective designs). Nevertheless, American law compensates people for pain and suffering (I think this is where you may have the issue--but it is our law, and I do agree that if something can help end human suffering then I am all for it). Also, judges award punitive damages to deter Defendants from committing the same type of acts repeatedly. The fact that defendants pay out punitive damages acts to deter others from wrongful acts, such as those that unnecessarily hurt people. By the way, punitive damages are not restricted to hurting people. There was a case involving Denny's and ONE (if I remember correctly) alleged racial comment (about someone looking out of place--where it was the INSINUATION where the problem lay) led to a MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR payout. Nobody got hurt. Yep, sticks and stones may break bones--but in law if one goes after a member of a federally protected class (i.e., racial, religion, gender etc.) then they are playing with proverbial fire. While that would not have been the verdict prior to 1964, it is law now. It is meant to deter oppression. Getting back to Liebeck, if we can do something to deter needless human suffering--and companies tend to listen when they have to pay--then it is a needed deterrent. If you haven't seen the pictures of Ms. Liebeck, Google them: You will be horrified--and you will agree that no human being should need to undergo what amounts to unspeakable horror at the extremes of what is torture, and conceivably, the limits of what human suffering could possibly be (it really is so much worse than "just" a coffee burn). Bottom line? Laws are meant to afford justice to victims--and to prevent or deter human suffering.
Pedro DuhHusky If you have a hammer, that you bought, and you crush your foot with it, THAT'S YOUR PROBLEM. How can a hammer company fix a problem with a hammer, IT'S A HAMMER. Lawsuits are mostly people who feel they should not be held responsible for their own actions. Companies should not be sued for the incompetence of society.
Matt Ricketts You ramble on incoherently and nobody could make sense of your POORLY WRITTEN rant, FOOL--the only "DUMB SHIT" is YOU!! BTW, that was LEGAL standards, STOOPID shit!! When you learn to respect others perhaps you'll get treated likewise. Talk to the HAND!!
It's amazing, I don't even know the group this is inspired from, other than from that one song at the end of Matrix 2 (possibly called 'Wake up'), and I still instantly thought it was them almost as soon as he started rapping. Undeniably, his impersonation and musical skills are exceptional.
It's a little better now. The stores have Halloween and Christmas decorations for sale at the same time. Thanksgiving should sue stores for forgetting about it's existence.
*Karens Apostrophes are for contraction or possessive nouns, not pluralizing. *they're (contraction of "THEY aRE") their: for possession there: for all other uses *the manager (singular) managers = plural
I listened to this with my headphones on max volume and now my ears hurt. Weird Al, you'll be hearing from my attorneys shortly
Yeah but you wont be hearing back
Mic 🎤 drop
He's gonna sue you for sueing him
@@someguy70 Well i ought a sue him for sueing me sueing him, my attorney’s name is Sue God damnit.
@@someguy70counter sue for frivolous lawsuit
" I sued toys r us because I swallowed a nerf ball "
The real reason toys r us went out of business because weird al sued them
Sorry, It got revived as "Geoffrey's Toy Box".
"And then I chocked to death"
You don't choke to death if toys r us comes back
Ya I’m from the future and I came to tell ya toys r us is gone now so u don’t need to do that
He had balls in his mouth because why ?
"I sued Delta Airlines because they sold me a ticket to New Jersey, I went there- and it SUCKED"
No matter how many times I hear this song, this line will ALWAYS make me laugh out loud.
HAHAHAHAHHA
I was singing along and lost it at that line
@@quimeau i feel like no one is talking about the World Trade Center in the window 0:01
@@sethsmithLOUDNOISES lol
It’s the conviction in his voice lmao. I went there… and it SUCKED
The fact that you can legitimately thrash and headband to this song really emphasis Weird Al's musical understanding without such a absurd and hilarious premise this song would not sound out of place on a Rage album.
"Headband" lol
It already doesn’t sound out of place in a rage album tbh
Headband? Wrong word buddy
@@tesseract5569 I’m talking about the specific Weird Al headband exclusive released on his Venezuelan tour in 1995 actually.
Correct, Rage Against the Machine has ZERO sense of humor, and even less factual accuracy.
"I sued Verizon"
You know what? I can get behind that.
i sued verizon because the other caller couldn't hear me now.
I love how the verizon guy is the devil lol
@@rodneya7021 imagine going to hell after you die and the devil asking you if you can hear him now lol
280 likes
nice
I love how that like 2004 ad campaign is still so iconic lol
"I SUED BEN AFFLECK. DO I EVEN NEED A REASON?" -Fair point Al, you do you
How has this been here for a year with 21 likes but no comments?
@@metaversian2685 i mean he's right
I dont blame him...after batman v superman and showing his peepee in gone girl
@@marccram2664 Hey! Ben Affleck was one of the few good things about that mess, that warehouse scene is like a live action Arkham City
you sue you
This is Weird Al’s most underrated song
So is virus alert and gump
And close but no cigar
All songs of Weird Al are underrated. Cos' all are masterpieces😁
Weird al should sue his fans for lost revenue
underrated- not rated or valued highly enough
With the Gorilla glue girl incident this song is now relevant again
She isn't suing though?
@@PointsofData She was considering it, and even hired a lawyer
I'll glue ya
@Phoenix Puckett Excuse me?
@Phoenix Puckett So I'm assuming you like girls???? And you want me????
And if I lose in court, I'll sue my lawyer.
👏
🤔
He is too smart to be kept alive
And will snitch like tekashi 6ix9ine
will you use that lawyer as your lawyer while suing your lawyer?
Funny thing is, he's describing actual lawsuits. I heard about a few of them.
Bodine v. Enterprise High School: Nineteen-year old falls through skylight while trying to steal gymnasium floodlights, sues school for injuries and wins. This is one of many court cases where a criminal sued the victim and one. It's really dumb, but sometimes it really does happen.
The coffee being spilled in the lap is definitely Stella Liebeck, but he's changed it from McDonalds to Starbucks.
"I'll sue ya if you even look at me funny" could be a reference to Prince, who constantly rejected Als offers to parody his music. At one point when they were both supposed to attend the American Music Awards, Prince had his lawyers send a letter to Al, telling him to not even look at Prince in the eye.
Paul Graves the coffee lawsuit was actually much worse than that
There is a video on youtube describing the wierdest lawsuits.
Negan's Evil Twin there are probably many.
This is obviously in the style of RATM and I'm here for it! Al is an underrated musical genius, able to cross all genres.
That snare sounds fucking disgusting when the drummer unleashes on the heavy parts
The fact his guitarist can even come close to Tom's style tells us the talent in this band.
CORRECT
Not in the style. This is exactly RATM. I’m sure he got their permission. FU I won’t do what you tell me :)
Korn too
Can we just stop for a moment and admire how awesomely he parodied Rage Against the Machine and what I can only guess as being a Bulls On Parade-inspired track? They even included a Tom Morello-like dude complete with his Arm the Homeless guitar!
*Arm the Lawyers!
@@belacickekl7579 no. Tom Morello’s iconic guitar has “Arm the Homeless” written on it.
@@MrMurdock86 In the video, the guitar is nicknamed "arm the lawyers" instead of "arm the homeless."
noo this is really closer to bomb-track
And now they do what they told ya is what I thought it sounded like
now that he mentions it, Colorado does look a bit too much like Wyoming
We were here first dammit!
or Wyoming looks like Colorado
Y’all Wyoming and Colorado to look the damn same 😂😂😂😂😂😂
I'm making the call right now
@@JABoyle3875 Wyoming has the cooler name
“They sold me a ticket to New Jersey. I went there, and it sucked”
I've been there and it does suck tbh
You watched the video too? No way!
Dude that’s such a unique comment. 100 percent is from the video
@@lazyboi2373 He's gonna sue you for this
I live there, and yeah it has many flaws, such as high prices and traffic.
And it’s very dense LOL
Missed an oppertunity to have the line "I sued my lawyer because he said that lawsuit would never hold up"
Reminds me of a broadcast of an Adventures in Odyssey program, a lawyer won a lawsuit so spectacularly that he became so in-demand that he couldn’t take on every client that approached him so he got sued for that
@@drewbaker2336 oh man, I never thought I'd come across someone who also grew up with adventures in odyssey. Though I don't remember that episode. But it could be because it's been years since I listened to the program.
@@drewbaker2336 Bart actually did threaten to sue him after they... Technically won, I guess.. Wonder what the writers would think of this song... That episode came out in 1995.
Just found this on the Hot Coffee documentary
What are you doing here this is not osu
117 likes
mice
czcams.com/video/KNWh6Kw3ejQ/video.html
I don’t understand the comment
I wonder if the Switch release of GTA will have Hot Coffee, one can only hope
Gonna sue weird Al cause I went to his concert 18years ago and I still can't stop laughing 😂😂😂
David Star have you stopped laughing yet
@@Selzor
I wish I could say no but........
🤣🤣🤣🤣🇺🇸🇺🇸😂😂😂😂😂🤪🤪🤪🤪🥵🤩🤩🤩😋😋😋😀😃😄😁😆😅😂🤣🤣🤣🤩😍😅😂😄😀😄
*18 years
Gonna sue Weird Al too, cause when he dressed up as Madonna at the concert I wenta, I got aroused. Gonna need that money for therapy.
@@DavysgravyStopped yet?
I feel like no one is talking about his Teletubby tie
He’s probably suing everyone just to get attention cause nobody likes him cause he’s got zero sense of fashion
@@bigfatrockstar4991 dam o k
I believe He Bought it on EBay.
@@bigfatrockstar4991 Sounding like somebody jealous of the tie.
@@bigfatrockstar4991 I think it's very fashionable sir.
I love how Weird Al addresses the need for justice at the end of this video and at the end of First World Problems.
yeah... even nature ain't just, f...k fake justice warriors
It is sad though that the coffee lawsuit was referenced here. I really hope most people know the truth about that lawsuit by now. It wasn't frivolous, that elderly woman had 3rd degree genital burns. I'd sue McDonalds too.
It was just an easy win, seriously coffee has been hot since the beginning of coffee and she put the coffee in her lap
The truth is that she chose to place a 180 degree cup of coffee (in a paper cup) between her legs while being a passenger in a car. She spilled the cup into her lap. Her attorney argued that since is was hotter than a "normal cup of coffee" (175 degrees) McDonalds was negligent. Her injuries were real and sad but it wasn't McDonalds fault. Regardless of how painful an accident is, accepting responsibility, rather than blaming others for your choices, is the right thing to do. That's the whole point of this parody.
@@roses2155 two things: according to the official investigation, a difference of 5 degrees lowers the time to suffer third degree burns from 12+ seconds down to 3. and the coffee was 20 degrees hotter than it should've been, not 5 like you claimed.
seems so weird to me that you would pick the literal poster child of misrepresented lawsuits to defend? in any case, the right thing to do is doing even basic research on what you're trying to correct people over, Rose
@@roses2155 "The coffee was not just “hot,” but dangerously hot. McDonald’s corporate policy was to serve it at a temperature that could cause serious burns in seconds. Mrs. Liebeck’s injuries were far from frivolous. She was wearing sweatpants that absorbed the coffee and kept it against her skin. She suffered third-degree burns (the most serious kind) and required skin grafts on her inner thighs and elsewhere.
Liebeck’s case was far from an isolated event. McDonald’s had received more than 700 previous reports of injury from its coffee, including reports of third-degree burns, and had paid settlements in some cases.
Mrs. Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. But McDonald’s never offered more than $800, so the case went to trial. The jury found Mrs. Liebeck to be partially at fault for her injuries, reducing the compensation for her injuries accordingly. But the jury’s punitive damages award made headlines - upset by McDonald’s unwillingness to correct a policy despite hundreds of people suffering injuries, they awarded Liebeck the equivalent of two days’ worth of revenue from coffee sales for the restaurant chain. That wasn’t, however, the end of it. The original punitive damage award was ultimately reduced by more than 80 percent by the judge."
TL;DR McDonald's knowingly brewed their coffee to a temperature that could _seriously damage someone within seconds_ AND HAD ACTUALLY INJURED HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE BEFORE THIS and *she won her case* , the dispute was the SETTLEMENT NOT WHO WAS AT FAULT
Hot coffee SHOULD NOT cause serious injuries just because you spill it on yourself!
Oh so people sue companies for their own stupidity
If anyone's wondering what the "original" is its kind of a medley of a few Rage Against The Machine songs, mainly Bombtrack with elements of Killing In The Name, Know Your Enemy and Bulls On Parade thrown in.
I feel like wake up is a better fit then bulls on parade
@@mikeydfas9 I don't see any Wake Up in this whatsoever my friend
Yeah, the "Burn, burn, yes, I'm gonna burn" chorus is unmistakable.
0:00 to 0:12 = Bombtrack & Guerrilla Radio.
0:13 to 0:26 = Bombtrack.
0:27 to 1:10= Bulls on Parade & Wake Up.
1:11 to 1:21 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
1:22 to 1:34 = Bombtrack.
1:35 to 1:46 = Know Your Enemy.
1:47 to 2:30 = Bulls on Parade & Wake Up.
2:31 to 3:02 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
3:03 to 3:16 = Killing in the Name, Freedom & Bullet in the Head.
3:17 to 3:51 = Bullet in the Head & Wake Up.
@@fzcbh4698 yup the part where he goes "sue, sue, yeah I'm gonna sue" is a play on "burn burn, yeah you're gonna burn" from Bombtrack
NOW I will sue you for no epilepsy warning
Bastian Jerome I had to cover the screen
I’ll sue you for making me waste my time because I’m reading you comment
Yeah man same I got a notification
They are grooving
(No offense)
Do people in Japan also sue sometimes? wonder if there was a lawsuit against the people that does the Pokemon Anime for that one episode and possible the news for showing the same scene again.
The fact that I still know the lyrics and it’s been years since I’ve watched this yeah these videos are GOLD✨
Not only is this insanely funny, it's also such a good song to listen to.
Who ever disliked got sued by al
Can confirm, just did and a lawsuit just came in
@@benjagonzalez9940 about time
“Weird Al” Sued Albert. (Entertainment purposes)
Hats off to his backup band for pulling off RATM pretty damn well.
Ikr? I love RATM.
Its mostly him.
I could not figure what song this was
@@jacobefaber4952 he's not parodying an RATM song, he's parodying their style
Jacobe Faber He sometimes parodies styles. Germs Germs Germs sounds like nine inch nails.
unironically a fucking banger even after a decade
I like how the guitar has "Arm The Lawyers" painted on it. 1:34 for a good shot.
"If you deliver my pizza 30 seconds late!!!!" Favourite part :)
Me to
It’s sad how true that is
69th like
“Wise man say, forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza.”
I never order home delivered Pizza because it is an abuse of power. My power. I don't want to rule the World. I don't want slaves. I can make my own bloody pizza. Fukc me!
You could call it "Rage Algainst The Machine"
Ironically, that name would warrant a lawsuit! Lol!
More like Sue the machine
Would it? I'm pretty sure it would probably be fair use because of parody.
Suing in the name of!
177 likes
nice
middle schoolers when they win literally anything 1:22
The fact that this man can take a song so comical and give it a beat that you can genuinely rock out to just show's this man's musical ability.
I sue gravity for pulling me down everytime i jump up
sorry, gravity is a governmental instiution that is paid for to make you stay to the ground, it is 100% legal for them to do this, sorry, please contact your local government for more information
I remember the last time the government was gridlocked and everything started floating away
Can't sue a theory.
You can't - gravity isn't real:
Why Gravity is NOT a Force
czcams.com/video/XRr1kaXKBsU/video.html
201 likes
nice
Please rise for what should be our national anthem.
Wonderful song about the 2000-2010 era; the so-called "Era of stupid lawsuits"
Let's hope people learned something from it.
Karen's theme song
Fine Bros official theme.
+naglfar31 it's chill, they've dropped it all now
+naglfar31 *_HILARIOUS AND ORIGINAL_*
soooo original
+naglfar31 I don't get it.
Why is that nobody who even understands what Fine Bros was trying to is making jokes about them, yes they were trying to own that industry on youtube but they were going to provide resources and views, it was basically a huge business deal that due to the numbers of uneducated people on youtube fell down immediately.
Now I realized why so many companies were going out of business, he almost sued everything.
I can't believe Weird Al made a song like Rage Against the Machine. And I f***ing love it.
I'm so happy that people have posted videos of Al singing this in concert, especially his latest sit down ones. He sounds amazing!!!
This is one of Weird Al's best parodies. It's so close to reality...
It’s a “style parody.” Sometimes he parodies a band’s sound without copying any specific themes or riffs from them. “Dog Eat Dog” is a Talking Heads style parody. “Dare to Be Stupid” is a Devo style parody. “Germs” is a Nine Inch Nails style parody.
Sometimes it’s hard to tell. Is “You Don’t Love Me Anymore” a style parody of Extreme, or is it a full original? “Where’s Johnny” turned out to be a specific song parody but until I heard the song it was parodying, I thought it was a Scritti Politti style parody.
It's. Not a parody
@@felicity4711 I believe another term is pastiche
Correct, Rage Against the Machine has ZERO sense of humor, and even less factual accuracy.
Bruh he pretty much predicted the Karen’s
saw him last week in Buffalo, they played this. the entire band just absolutely killed it. it was incredible.
Is that a rage against the system? Oh my god, this band is in every genre! Extremely talented
Possibly, but it also could just be ranting against annoying mundane everyday things, ESPECIALLY Karens suing for the sake of suing.
every genre indeed, even polka music
I was like this sounds like rage against the machine 😂
@@Harley122391 exactly, I just can't recalled it for that moment.. "System " 😂
@@George_Shonia I mean I’d listed to a band called rage against the system 😂🤷♀️
1:06
Wouldn't it make more sense to sue New Jersey?
As a foreigner, this is the song that helped me learn where Wyoming and Colorado are. Thanks Al!
As a US citizen, I always think of this video when I'm trying to remember which one is which
@@andrewgust-anderson5612 As a Coloradan, I'm offended. I'ma gonna sue!
But not New Jersey...
If Rage Against the Machine doesn't cover this, I'm gonna sue.
Noah Leitch I actually can’t stand RAtM. Too communist.
@@noahleitch6367 Sad, but true. They are just lefties with the usual lefty rage and a whole lot of awesome shredding. Makes me sad....
@@LadyIarConnacht did u live in the ghetto and deal with the shit they dealt with?.
These comments didnt age well. Lmao Rage just announced they're going on tour. And how are they leftists?
@Maurice Fisher implying being a leftist is a bad thing
My man just pulled a classic, "I'm reviewing my legal options."
I'd like to take a moment to appreciate that this mad lad went back to his 14 year old music video and added 4k resolution. Like, could have reuploaded it to get some more view rev or something but nah, just went and added a 4k option to the original bloody upload.
Awsome parody of rage against the machine
0:01 to 0:11 = Bombtrack & Guerrilla Radio.
0:12 to 0:22 = Bombtrack.
0:23 to 0:27 = Killing In The Name.
0:28 to 1:10= Bulls on Parade & Wake Up.
1:11 to 1:21 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
1:22 to 1:34 = Bombtrack.
1:35 to 1:45 = Know Your Enemy & Take The Power Back.
1:46 to 2:29 = Bulls on Parade & Wake Up.
2:30 to 2:39 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
2:40 to 2:51 = Bombtrack.
2:52 to 3:01 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
3:02 to 3:17 = Guerrilla Radio, Killing in the Name & Bullet in the Head.
3:18 to 3:51 = Bullet in the Head, Guerrilla Radio, Take the Power Back & Wake Up.
I'll sue you for spelling AWESOME wrong.
@@thisismagacountry1318 what the name
@@renhey9979 Something I borrowed from Jussie Smollett.
Scientology's theme song.
Note: I just got sued by Scientology for writing this comment..
Haha
No, you are forgetting about the religion that produces the most lawyers.
Note: I am allowed to make this joke I am Jewish.
lier
+Austin Stephens **liar
lol
This is the best RATM song never made by RATM. Did tom or anyone from the band ever publicly comment on this song? Al is a seriously good musician and this works as a great original song.
Correct, Rage Against the Machine has ZERO sense of humor, and even less factual accuracy.
@@scottdoesntmatter4409 That's because they, like many Leftists, have been indoctrinated by Marxists.
Step one of the "Four Steps for Communist Ideological Subversion" (Yuri Bezmenov, 1985)
Demoralization - this is a process which can take about 15-30 years to perform (a generation). *During this stage, the moral fibre and integrity of the country is put into question, thereby creating doubt in the minds of the people. To do so, manipulation of the media and academia is required to influence young people.* As the younger generation embraces new values, such as Marxism and Leninism, the older generation slowly loses control simply through attrition. *Again, true facts no longer matter during this stage, but rather creating perceptions are of paramount importance.*
Communism and Religion
Abolished - all religious and metaphysics is rejected. Engels and Lenin agreed that religion was a drug or “spiritual booze” and must be combated. To them, atheism put into practice meant *a “forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.”*
Eliminating American exceptionalism, fundamental change of national identity, structural deconstruction of foundational principles, elimination of religion. *Embedding a new societal design upon the psyche of generations through ideological academia, peer pressure by elites upon academics and society to convince that prior values were inherently flawed, racist, prejudiced etc. National identity is diluted with aspersions toward historical references. National History is re-written, re-defined, and molded to fit the new intended behavioral model and create the new values.*
*“[T]he useful idiots, the leftists who are idealistically believing in the beauty of the Soviet socialist or Communist or whatever system,* when they get disillusioned, they become the worst enemies. That’s why my KGB instructors specifically made the point: never bother with leftists. Forget about these political prostitutes. Aim higher. [...] They serve a purpose only at the stage of destabilization of a nation. *For example, your leftists in the United States: all these professors and all these beautiful civil rights defenders. They are instrumental in the process of the subversion only to destabilize a nation. When their job is completed, they are not needed any more.* They know too much. Some of them, when they get disillusioned, when they see that Marxist-Leninists come to power-obviously they get offended-they think that they will come to power. That will never happen, of course. *They will be lined up against the wall and shot.”*
Wow! Never knew Al had vocal power like that.
"If you deliver my pizza... 30 seconds late..!" Sounds like me when I'm having a mental breakdown.
Japan: Hold my beer
The sad thing is that there are people who actually think like this.
EariosRandomness
I'm suing you because I'm taking the time to write this reply on your comment
craigers37 Oh yeah? Well I countersue you for commenting here to begin with!
Romario Desrosier, I’m suing you because your suing me
craigers37 Fine, I'll see you in court! *dresses in tennis outfit*
The drumming is outstanding
I watched them perform this live and IT WAS EPIC!!!! Even though it was on the Vanity Tour, IT WAS STILL FUCKING EPIC. (It was my first concert too!)
I sued Nintendo, cuz the joysticks on my Joycons drift
ooF
Thought you were gonna sue them for the N64 controller joystick ripping your palm skin off playing mario party
Northeasthotdog NEHD make it into a rhyme.
I think that happened before. I had stopped playing the Switch but now i play Animal Crossing New Horizons and Blazblue Cross Tag Battle online
WD-40, if you still need the advice :p
While most are bogus, the one about spraging his ankle while he's robbing your place has really happened before. And people have won settlements for getting hurt while robbing people's homes. Disgusting that the justice system rewards criminals like that.
Actually, most of them ate true, they are only worded differently. For instance the part with frappuino and StarBucks. In the original lawsuit the woman sued McDonalds because, while she was holding the cup in between her legs in a car, she spilled hot coffee on her lap and got second and third degree burns.
which is why you wanna live in a state with castle law doctrine!
rafael502 And to make sure your a good shot. If you must defend yourself, go for a headshot. A dead person can't sue you.
A Chinese guy sued his wife because she gave him ugly children and god knows how he won
ANTONY bell Because, China. I mean, after all, he can only have ONE child. Think about it....
I got this in my heavy metal playlist, awesome
"Do I even need a reason" had me 😆
My five-year-old son burned down my apartment after playing with matches, so of course I sued MTV. What, you expect me to take responsibility for what my kids watch? That's the TV's job.
Parental Advisory In. nutshell
+javon lilly Trump in a Nutshell
lol yup
Lol Beavis And Butthead
Are you homeless, now? Or is this a joke?
Keemstar.
YEP
I'd watch your back man....He is lerking
ALEX IS A STUPID....
+Darkhalo314 nibbler
Basically everyone in America
Growing up is realising that Al suing large corporations exclusively is a good thing.
I got whiplash from banging my head too hard at this song. I'm gonna sue you now Al
I'm a sue google + for not letting us read comments and forcing us to join!
That gives me an idea! I should sue Twitch for not letting me use the chat unless I sign in via FaceBook! I don't have a FaceBook account, nor do I want one! Thanks!
CaptainActually1 Then don't fucking use it genius. It's just a public IRC channel - Yes, IRC. You can access it using whichever program.
That's actually a good idea and a good reason!
Mansen it's a JOKE, moron
I sued Madonna for being old and still looking 25
I think Al's laugh at 3:39: "Ha-ha, Ha-ha-ha!" is the most perfect thing I've ever heard.
Someday I want that as my ringtone...
the new jersey line got me
13 years later and its still funny
One of Weird Al's most hardcore songs.
Entitled Parent: This song is so relatable.
This song has outlasted many of the companies Al references in it.
"they sold me a ticket to new jersey; I went there and it sucked" is far and away my favorite line
I love Rage Against the Machine, which makes this even funnier XD
Pegasi A parody like this of metalica woulda been good.
What song is it a parody of?
Guitarmaster60 Pretty similar to Killing in the Name - RATM
@ 0:40 the lawyer is playing Morello's guitar XD
Metal Warrior This is a style parody of RATM, not of a specific song
I sued CZcams because I watched Jake Paul and I didn't like it
I sued youtube cause they have too many videos and I can't watch them all.
@@CurlyFromTheSwirly I sued CZcams because you cant like something twice with one account
@@userhbiron1806, I'm suing because I can't like & dislike the same video. 😹
@@CurlyFromTheSwirly SAME, we gotta sue
@@userhbiron1806, yes we do, and I'm gonna sue you too.🤣
Broooo this song will never get old
So much damn nostalgia, used to rock out to Weird Al all the time in middle school.
ya man. bad hair day album!
The american dream...
To be rear ended by a Mercedes.
3:34, your right! that murican flag in the background.
"I sued Delta Airlines coz they sold me a ticket to New Jersey. I went there and it SUCKED! Yeeeaaaahh!"
Best line because NJ does SUCK!
"if i hurt my knuckles... when i punch you in the face!"
And have you even been there?
I find that offensive im gonna sue you
I think most of us can agree, suing Delta Airlines for selling a ticket to New Jersey and suing Nieman Marcus for putting up Christmas decorations out of season are valid lawsuits.
Weird Al is all time best parody artist in the world.
This is an original song.
Al studies an artists enire body of work and then writes an oridinal song in that style.
Al wrote this song in the style of Rage against the Machine.
This is probably the best animation on Weird Als channel...
"If I sprain my ankle, while I'm robbing your place,
if I hurt my knuckles, when I punch you in the face,''
Sounds like the UK except you actually go to jail AND get sued.
Was going to jail for not having a robbery license
It's funny because a man sprained his ankle while robbing a school. The man filed a lawsuit too.
@@tanyarickman3600 tf is there to rob from a school loool
@@RBLXDignitysHQ school equipement, Laptops, Projectors
This also happened in Texas i think is the one hes directing it too
This song is phenomenal live, im glad that i finally found it.
Greatest satirical song ever!!!!
America: the song
The battle cry of our age.
Sadly it's true.
I always knew this was a RATM parody, but it took me until now to notice the guitarist is literally playing Morello's guitar
An international icon, nobody is as creative and funny as Weird Al
he's right though people sue for some of the stupidest reasons
I should sue you for that comment!!!
Josh Thompson I think you're trying to be funny but in this day and age it's impossible to tell
Just a joke sir. Just a joke.
Josh Thompson I should sue ya for suing about people sueing for stupid reasons!
In the USA, that is.
I'm gonna sue Al Yankovic for giving me epilepsy from this video.
Booyah!
I'll Sue Ya!
(Best Lyric by far)
why does this kinda go hard though
I know right? 🤟🏻🤟🏻
To those who discuss the Liebeck v. McDonalds case (1984) below, Ms. Liebeck became the poster child for American lawsuits gone haywire--unnecessarily so. There was great vitriol and spite for this poor soul. Most people don't realize that this martyr (she became one in that case) is responsible for the cup holders in our cars today. Thanks to her bravery, we don't have to risk the same, painful fate--and YES (!) it was quite painful. I saw pictures of her THIRD degree burns, which required she undergo an operation. At the time of her painful and quite serious injuries, there was NO place to put the cup due to the car-design (and car designs, in general). Moreover, the car was parked--NOT moving. She was the passenger. Originally, she ONLY wanted McD's to pay her medical bills--AND LOWER THE COFFEE TEMPERATURE, which was HOTTER than industry STANDARDS. That's it! They arrogantly refused to respect her wishes, and she pressed on. McD's REFUSED to lower the temperature notwithstanding the fact that HUNDREDS of people ALREADY gave McD's notice that they were injured during a given time--when the injuries were recorded. And, by the way, NO, Ms. Liebeck did NOT gain millions of dollars. A trial court judge reduced her original verdict amount--given to her at the hands of a horrified jury to ONLY $640,000 (having seen the pictures, you know what I mean by "only"). It was a David v. Goliath case of arrogance--and a concerned citizen who refused to just knuckle under. Yes, folks, this poor lady pressed on because she didn't want to see ANYONE ELSE suffer that fate. Rather than enviously looking at her with disdain, perhaps people should educate themselves on the true facts behind the Liebeck v. McDonald's story. Thank you, Ms. Liebeck. May you RIP.
I saw that on Netflix too....
Pedro DuhHusky Hi Pedro. Thanks for your most inquisitive reply. For a company to need changes due to people getting hurt is equivocated with negligence according to Tort law. Thus, as a matter of law, McDonalds would be held to be negligent if they were found to be selling coffee that is significantly hotter than industry standards. A company is held to a reasonableness standard. If they are found to be selling coffee that is unreasonably hot--hotter than industry standards--then they are found to be negligent. Moreover, if the company has had notice of hundreds (that we know of at a certain time) of people getting burned and they refused to change it, that is a problem. (People will continue getting hurt without changes.) Importantly, in personal injury law, there are damages for pain and suffering. Admittedly, this is balanced against the negligence of the Plaintiff. However, where a product is dangerous enough that many people are getting hurt with it--and the company has received notice after notice, such that they are well-aware of the volume of injuries--then it becomes a problem for the company (this can be seen in products liability cases also, with dangerous and defective designs).
Nevertheless, American law compensates people for pain and suffering (I think this is where you may have the issue--but it is our law, and I do agree that if something can help end human suffering then I am all for it). Also, judges award punitive damages to deter Defendants from committing the same type of acts repeatedly. The fact that defendants pay out punitive damages acts to deter others from wrongful acts, such as those that unnecessarily hurt people. By the way, punitive damages are not restricted to hurting people. There was a case involving Denny's and ONE (if I remember correctly) alleged racial comment (about someone looking out of place--where it was the INSINUATION where the problem lay) led to a MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR payout. Nobody got hurt. Yep, sticks and stones may break bones--but in law if one goes after a member of a federally protected class (i.e., racial, religion, gender etc.) then they are playing with proverbial fire. While that would not have been the verdict prior to 1964, it is law now. It is meant to deter oppression.
Getting back to Liebeck, if we can do something to deter needless human suffering--and companies tend to listen when they have to pay--then it is a needed deterrent. If you haven't seen the pictures of Ms. Liebeck, Google them: You will be horrified--and you will agree that no human being should need to undergo what amounts to unspeakable horror at the extremes of what is torture, and conceivably, the limits of what human suffering could possibly be (it really is so much worse than "just" a coffee burn). Bottom line? Laws are meant to afford justice to victims--and to prevent or deter human suffering.
Pedro DuhHusky If you have a hammer, that you bought, and you crush your foot with it, THAT'S YOUR PROBLEM. How can a hammer company fix a problem with a hammer, IT'S A HAMMER. Lawsuits are mostly people who feel they should not be held responsible for their own actions. Companies should not be sued for the incompetence of society.
.
Matt Ricketts You ramble on incoherently and nobody could make sense of your POORLY WRITTEN rant, FOOL--the only "DUMB SHIT" is YOU!! BTW, that was LEGAL standards, STOOPID shit!! When you learn to respect others perhaps you'll get treated likewise. Talk to the HAND!!
I had a seizure from this video, I'm suing.
+Paul Power But i'm gonna sue you
Avi Mehra Noooo, my money!!!
+Paul Power - I'm gonna sue you too!
rahkin rah whhhhhhhhyyyyyyyy
+Paul Power -'cause your company produced that hair drrrdddyeeyerrr!! This video is funny as S#^$!
weird al is going out there and doing all of the things that we've all wanted to do.
It's amazing, I don't even know the group this is inspired from, other than from that one song at the end of Matrix 2 (possibly called 'Wake up'), and I still instantly thought it was them almost as soon as he started rapping. Undeniably, his impersonation and musical skills are exceptional.
I wish we *could* sue stores for putting up the Xmas decorations *BEFORE HALLOWEEN*!
I'd be happy enough if the Legion could sue them for dishonoring veterans by putting up decorations before Remembrance Day (Veterans' Day in the US).
Chris Hennick can a person be sued for hanging nazzi decorations on hes balcony on the fourth of july? i wonder.
silimon4 It would bother me much less than seeing Hallmark's Christmas commercials in *SEPTEMBER.*
It's a little better now. The stores have Halloween and Christmas decorations for sale at the same time. Thanksgiving should sue stores for forgetting about it's existence.
Sue Ben Affeck for playing Batman.
Karen's when they realise the person their talking to is the managers:
*Karens
Apostrophes are for contraction or possessive nouns, not pluralizing.
*they're (contraction of "THEY aRE")
their: for possession
there: for all other uses
*the manager (singular)
managers = plural
@@alvallac2171 🎼 Word crimes
Looking at the thumbnail I thought it was gonna be a Korn parody 😂