@@1DS9 I am currently rebuilding my 79 CBX. 2.5mm overbore, Carrillo's, ported head, Megacycle cams, one off cam sprocket set up for easy cam timing etc. CBX's do suck when it comes to getting parts and some of the engine lay out (like the clutch driven alternator system). They sound nice and look interesting but stock RWHP was mediocre at best. My 75 CB750F now makes 107 RWHP now with a custom billet block that I designed.....no stroker or turbo.
Believe it or not they didn't make a lot of power from the factory. The CB 900f was faster. They didn't make a lot of performance part for the CBX. Most stuff was one off custom made and very expensive
6 cylinder 6 carbs 6 exhaust, Yup def the mark of the beast. I LOVE IT
Had one of these is '78, UK spec. Bought it for the noise and the looks.
Proper bike !!!!!!!😀👍👍👍👍👍👍
Un suono meraviglioso io ne posseggo una 1 serie
When ever you feel unnecessary, think about the Guy who did Put the factory exhaust the cbx
Say what now???
Where is it running upto redline in each gear!? Great vid though thx uploader.
You must sounds like a beast my 1999 gsxr 750 no muffler being Dyno tested, it's really aggressive sounding.
👌👌👌
The bikes of today sound nothing like the 70s and 80s street bikes.Gen X
Mantap kak salam kenal kak
C Mon Lindsay how much
why did it take a fortnight to pick up?
Dan Dan I'll guess that it was a top gear pull
No dyno results what the hell
what are the numbers ?
+andycliff1965 110 Hp at 9,000 rpm Cheers.
Because this bike is from the late 70s/early 80s. Engine design has come a long way since then.
didnt sound that great with head phones on,,,old vid i recon
how many hp have this beast???
+xTheCoopGamersx Hi on the day was 110 hp
My SOHC 750/1000 made 98 HP all day long. CBX's suck BUT I do own a 79.
@@mikerieck306 lol no way. These bikes are awesome way cooler than your bike. These with a stroker or turbo make big power
@@1DS9 I am currently rebuilding my 79 CBX. 2.5mm overbore, Carrillo's, ported head, Megacycle cams, one off cam sprocket set up for easy cam timing etc. CBX's do suck when it comes to getting parts and some of the engine lay out (like the clutch driven alternator system). They sound nice and look interesting but stock RWHP was mediocre at best.
My 75 CB750F now makes 107 RWHP now with a custom billet block that I designed.....no stroker or turbo.
@@mikerieck306 thats pretty cool brotha. I got a turbo busa low compression wossner pistons, carillo rods stock head tho, Stage 2 velocity turbo kit ,Mtc lock up clutch, and a mild stretch. Putting down nearly 300 wheel.
Turn up the sound? sounds like a flat tyre! I have a CBX then now there is a sound!
What?
1st gear ? Really ??
+rattlehonda Check out second gear here" CBX1000 Rol's Beast Broadford May 2011"
Believe it or not they didn't make a lot of power from the factory. The CB 900f was faster. They didn't make a lot of performance part for the CBX. Most stuff was one off custom made and very expensive
+Kenneth VanMeter Yes but its still the sexiest engine !!!
Jeez! you make it sound a disadvantage FFS!
CB900F ran about 12.0 in the 1/4 mile. CBX about 11.8. 900 was cool, CBX was beyond cool.
sound inside is very bad
That bike is cursed . Change the name asap
S. Fantastic. 2100