Zeiss CMM: Is the "Cookbook" always right?

Brian and myself discuss the value of the Zeiss "Cookbook", a document that provides guidance for CMM programmers in making decisions about strategies in programs.
We both use and trust the cookbook, but there are situations where the cookbook suggestions would result in long cycle times, with marginal return in additional useful data.
‪@HudsonValleyCC‬ ‪@BrianWickhamMFG‬ ‪@ZEISSIQS‬

[@VdrummerStixx777]

How I train my students is to start with cookbook and if it is to slow - measure the part 3 to 4 times without moving it so you have a base line and start upping the speed and until the data changes more than you can accept.
You will find that speed is not as important as filter and outlier.
For my students before talking about Cookbook my default scanning speed is 2 to 5 times faster than cookbook recommends; what we see is that filtered data with outlier at the faster speeds give me the same result as when we rerun the part at the recommended scanning speeds (with filter and outlier).
A lot of time you will also see that scanning is faster than single points especially on smaller diameters prime numbers with single points on round parts and you will see roundness issue with single touch.

[@ranjeetjha8424]

Sir I am very excited for watching the Knowledgeable video.

[@RDeanOdell]

Thanks so much for the support!

[@steve5nash]

The 4 P's of profitability: Pain, Pleasure, Problem and Preventative. Pain is the most profitable and Preventative is the least profitable. Metrology is preventative.

[@IsaiahRomero-fd1xz]

learned allot

[@reggielewis4196]

I use the cook book as a reference.

[@shadab630]

Please make more videos on cmm programing

[@teamaudilouis2915]

We don’t scan we take points. For our application scanning is not worth it.

[@RDeanOdell]

Thanks for the input!

[@teamaudilouis2915]

I have the cookbook

[@timtran3947]

How can I get the copy of the cookbook thanks