Jet Engine BREAKTHROUGH!? Hybrid Tops Mach 5+ Speeds

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 2. 12. 2023
  • Many new designs are overcoming the limitations of conventional jet turbines. So let's take a look at what is being developed!
    Sources & Credits:
    • SABRE Airflow animation
    • Hypersonic Scramjet Pr...
    • An Ohio Hypersonic Eng...
    • Hypersonic Engine Test...
    • Velo3D Ramjet Engine T...
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 35

  • @Triring65
    @Triring65 Před 4 měsíci +3

    You need to check a Japanese startup, PD Aero Space( PDエアロスペース ). They have created and bench tested a pulse detonation engine that can switch between air breathing and rocket engine with a flip of a switch.
    They are planning to field test the engine this year.

  • @mikeconnery4652
    @mikeconnery4652 Před 5 měsíci +3

    Excellent video

  • @ag135i
    @ag135i Před 5 měsíci +5

    The higher the speed the harder it's to manoeuvre and control.

  • @dreamersbasics7713
    @dreamersbasics7713 Před 5 měsíci +3

    Love your videos! As a request to add onto this video, can you do a video or short clip on the SABRE rocket engine that's been in development?

    • @davidste60
      @davidste60 Před 5 měsíci +1

      2:00

    • @dreamersbasics7713
      @dreamersbasics7713 Před 5 měsíci

      apologies,@@davidste60 I meant more of a full video, as there is very little information available that we can find on it. Honestly a SSTO engine deserves some attention IMHO.

    • @Kaizen712
      @Kaizen712 Před 4 měsíci

      @@dreamersbasics7713 They've been working on that engine for a long time and a case can be made that it's vaporware. I hope it isn't.

  • @robertthompson5858
    @robertthompson5858 Před 11 dny +1

    It's chimera with a k sound. A chimera is a mix of different animals.

  • @mnomadvfx
    @mnomadvfx Před 5 měsíci +4

    Chimera is not pronounced like SHIM-MURRA.
    It is pronounced like KAI-MERE-AH (KAI = K+EYE, MERE = M+EAR), in reference to the hybrid animal/woman monster from Greek myth.

  • @danfreeman9079
    @danfreeman9079 Před 5 měsíci

    neat stuff

  • @a-fl-man640
    @a-fl-man640 Před 5 měsíci +1

    born @ Eglin AFB in 52 sonic booms were an everyday occurrence, if not more frequently. can't say as they ever bothered me.

    • @dcolb121
      @dcolb121 Před 4 měsíci

      I was born in 53 and grew up within a few miles of Paine Field AFB. I remember hearing sonic booms more often when they got the F106's. The booms didn't bother me either.

  • @magnitudematrix2653
    @magnitudematrix2653 Před 4 měsíci

    Taking advantage of "Ideal gas law" to improve thermal efficiencies is perfect. No part is the best part.

  • @JCAtkeson3
    @JCAtkeson3 Před 5 měsíci +1

    How do you power a jet with electricity? Spin the turbine with a motor? 🤔

    • @davidste60
      @davidste60 Před 5 měsíci +1

      Spin the compressor with a motor. I'm not sure a turbine would be needed necessarily.

    • @JCAtkeson3
      @JCAtkeson3 Před 5 měsíci

      @@davidste60 Yeah thanks I mean compressor. The intake.

  • @LiftOffLife
    @LiftOffLife Před 5 měsíci

    Reaction Engines in the UK?

  • @krakhedd
    @krakhedd Před 6 měsíci +4

    Jet are impossibly impractical to power with electricity - the only possible way to generate the necessary power is nuke, and that's just not something you wanna fly around - let alone that plasma turbines are only theoretical atm

    • @ECL..
      @ECL.. Před 5 měsíci +2

      Both the USA and USSR have flown nuclear powered aircraft

    • @WolfeSaber9933
      @WolfeSaber9933 Před 5 měsíci

      ​@@ECL..The test beds weren't powered by the reactor.

    • @WolfeSaber9933
      @WolfeSaber9933 Před 5 měsíci

      Lockheed Martin is working to remedy the problem with power.

  • @Neobert5240
    @Neobert5240 Před 6 měsíci

    👍🤙🇺🇲⭐️🕳🤘😎💯

  • @scorpio6587
    @scorpio6587 Před 5 měsíci

    I think Starship will be a relatively inexpensive way to fly a long distance in a short time.

    • @stocky9218
      @stocky9218 Před 5 měsíci

      Potentially, but it can’t make use of the pre-existing infrastructure of airports. It’s co2 emissions would probably be substantially higher too if you care about that

    • @scorpio6587
      @scorpio6587 Před 5 měsíci

      @@stocky9218 I don't see how using airports is relevant to rockets, and the CO2 argument lacks foundation and relevance. I'm looking forward to supersonic commercial travel becoming available again.

    • @stocky9218
      @stocky9218 Před 4 měsíci

      @@scorpio6587 Sorry man, I just meant where would it land, how would passengers exit the ship and how would the passengers get to their destination from the landing sight which can't be near populated areas. Infrastructure is important and if you can't use pre existing infrastructure like airports then its going to be very difficult. As for emissions of course it has relevance, I don't know if you live under a rock but the aviation industry is very caught up in reducing emissions especially for passenger flights. I love starship and it would be cool to see passenger flights but supersonic/hypersonic planes are a much better option for many reasons especially because they can and will use pre existing infrastructure.

    • @scorpio6587
      @scorpio6587 Před 4 měsíci

      @@stocky9218 nonsense

    • @stocky9218
      @stocky9218 Před 4 měsíci

      @@scorpio6587 bruh

  • @artus198
    @artus198 Před 5 měsíci

    It is all hype , with little substance.

    • @pitmarkovic4545
      @pitmarkovic4545 Před 3 měsíci

      Interesting answer but they works not about I know

  • @user-zl8zo7ur4n
    @user-zl8zo7ur4n Před 5 měsíci +3

    Free palestine🇵🇸