Sony Xperia 1 III vs Galaxy S21 Ultra: Camera Comparison
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
- Get the Sony Xperia 1 III here:
www.bestbuy.co...
Can the Xperia 1 III beat the Galaxy S21 Ultra?
Want to sponsor the next PhoneArena video?
Get in touch: sponsorships@phonearena.com
--------
💙 Subscribe 💙 bit.ly/2IpbYha
📰 Read 📰 www.phonearena...
Follow us!
😍 Facebook: / phonearena
🌈 Instagram: / phonearena
🐦 Twitter: / phonearena
PhoneArena.com is your ultimate source of mobile tech news, reviews, and info. The PhoneArena CZcams channel delivers a vast range of smartphone, tablet, and accessory video reviews, in addition to regular hands-on, unboxing, and other uploads.
PhoneArena may receive a small commission if you purchase through affiliate links in this video.
If I had the spare cash I'd buy the Xperia 1 III in a heartbeat. In a market where with each generation manufacturers are removing more features from their flagships, I appreciate that companies like Sony are standing against the 'trends'.
Well it's underperforming, camera is below average, display is good, battery is average... It doesn't worth it
@@shwmimi3486 *it isn't worth it for you.
For me it has no notch or holepunch, a 21:9 display, a headphone jack, expandable storage, a near-stock Android skin, and is more responsive than most Android flagships.
Remember, what something is worth is in the eyes of the beholder; we all have different priorities, which is why it is important that we continue to have diversity in the smartphone market.
@@shwmimi3486 it has the best display on any phone. True 4k.... it's camera is natural. Why does everyone want filtered iPhone photos that showed over colored things. The camera can see what we can't but the Sony is for you to see what you can only see in real life in a photo. I got a 21 ultra by the way. Sony is about to be the best camera phone soon. If not at least second. Really they are first because Iphone uses Sony camera sensors... so it's really the tech that makes it does different exposers. Sony doesn't want fake images.
@@EvilAerith Do you work for Sony? Yes Sony makes good phones but not great! And why does other companies use Sony Cameras better then Sony? 🤔 If you pick Sony then good for you but in no way possible Sony's phone is better then the Ultra 21 not possible. When it comes to over all phone Ultra 21 wins hands down, Sony camera is very disappointing just be honest.
@@alexvdl1 I agree 100% we need choices & if the Sony phone is for you then enjoy but I'll take a camera hole anyday instead of a huge bezel & a downgraded camera. I want to buy a Sony phone so bad but I take photos & videos & for a cheaper price Galaxy ultra21 is a better phone. Plain and simple. But like u said it's best to have choices .
"The Xperia offers a lot in terms of manual controls" - guy who didn't use any of the manual controls in his camera comparison
This guy seems doesn't know how to use sony camera phone.
@@vikramvij1245 he did manual shoot comparison, didn’t you hear that he said manual comparison maybe next time.
@@PyareDebBarma why next time? The controls are the same as the alpha series and there's reviewers who got the same quality as that camera on this phone, which is insane, but no we get a guy spending a ton of time on the selfie cam. If you buy an xperia for a selfie cam, you're an idiot
@@Joshpower57 It is physically impossible to get the same results in difficult lighting with a tiny sensor phone, as on a large sensor mirrorless DSLR.
@@originalkk882 go watch "art of visuals" they show them side by side barely any difference
The sony engineers must cringe watching this. they spend all of their time trying to get photos to look as close to the human eye as possible. Only to get reviewers saying that the uranium fed bright green grass or glowing orange deers in the Samsung photos look better and therefore it takes better pictures. Same thing with oversharpening to see more details.
Not true! The Dynamic Range on Sony is HORRIBLE! Human eyes don't clip out blue sky and make it look like a grey mess!
Sony has NEVER paid attention to the Dynamic Range problem EVER! The inability to switch between lenses is another stupid move!
I have long been a Sony fan(since the Ericsson days), but I switched to LG because of Sony's refusal to address the camera issues.
@@bobinpune Go outside on a sunny day and look into a bright area. Can you see a perfect blue sky at the same time as you can see what's in the shadows? No I didn't think so
@@tommymedano pretty much, the people that actually do photography for a living love this phone. Idk who this comparison was made for. If you're not using the full capabilities of a Sony phone and the front selfie cam is important to you because you can flip the phone around an use the dedicated shutter button, Sony isn't for you.
@@bobinpune Xperia does not use HDR as default. Dynamic Range is caracteristic of the sensor, not software
Thank You.
First things first , I own a s21 Ultra and I love it . As for this video , I believe it's biased in A LOT of the comparisons. The most striking one in the video comparisons is at 5:00 , where anyone that has seen an actual deer (and the reviewer certainly has since he was there) knows that the 1 iii colors are exactly right , plus there is a shaking in the s21U footage (although it could be because of the way the phones were held) . Secondly , at the pause on 5:30 , can you really not see the noise on the s21U ?? Why don't you compare the colors there ?
Moving on , the night mode . Again , I LOVE the night mode on the S21U , because it allows me to take photos that I normally couldn't, but they certainly are NOT natural . I love having the option to shoot an unnatural night mode picture when I want to show what was there instead of darkness . But you can't go bashing the Sony as a worst camera in every single take when that is clearly not the case . At 8:07 it really IS a night and day difference , because apple makes it look like it's daytime , whereas the 1 iii takes a clean video that STILL LOOKS LIKE IT'S NIGHT . And the absolute worst example of biased reviewing is the photo at 8:28 . He even says "there is no comparison" and I agree , but in favor of the 1 iii 🤣 Take a moment and compare the grass . Which one looks like what you expect to see during that time ? Look at the sculpture on the 1iii , do you see those green details that turn to white in the middle ? Compare that to the S21U . Lastly , look at the S21U's trees on the background , don't they look like they are lit with a thousand flashes and all in the same depth ? Compare that to the 1iii smh . The 8:48 one looks so much worse at the S21U that I would turn off the night mode and I'm pretty sure the photo would look better .
I love review and comparison videos , but this is the first one that I will actually dislike . I don't care if a phone has a better camera than mine in some cases , you are not going to hurt my feelings . What I want to see is a fair comparison , especially if I was a dude trying to find which phone suits me more . Sorry for the wall of text , here is a potato 🥔
Let's dislike video...
Good points 👍
Agrees. Very bias review. Sony wants the picture to become what your actually is seeing and you can almost see the layers on the other phones when it comes to hdr getting the feeling all phones on other brands do this. First it takes the best shoot of the sky, it is the best shoot of the background and it over the blue sky and last it cuts in the object. It's looks in my eyes as i would have done a montage kinda. Sony had nothing artificial about their pictures. That what's important
Admit it - you don't actually have the Galaxy Ultra. You are just saying all this to make your point more credible.
Most people looking at this video will only have 1 conclusion except for the Sony fanboys.
Jerry Berglund good HDR works up to a point as most phone sensors do not have the native DR of our perception. It’s just that most processing adds all sorts of things to increase sharpness, clarity, colour saturation.
It’s funny in Lightroom I can increase “clarity” and texture sliders, which gives the impression of more details. You can see some phones seem to do this too and reviewers assume that the detail was like that in real life
This is a situation where you are not aware how to capture photos on a Sony phone and you still want to prove that you're a tech reviewer
The Dynamic Range on Sony is HORRIBLE! Human eyes don't clip out blue sky and make it look like a grey mess!
Sony has NEVER paid attention to the Dynamic Range problem EVER! The inability to switch between lenses is another stupid move!
@@bobinpune blah blah blah
@@bobinpune Please take a framegrab at 3:10 from this video and go to photoshop and select the Sony picture. Then choose shadows/highlight and decrease the highlight. Notice how sky comes back and is comparable to Samsung. I think Sony has a HDR setting to make it more similar but also lot more unnatural.
Do you understand the meaning of “auto mode”? Most people dont want to play with iso, shutter speed… when they take a photo.
Sony is dead
1. Wouldn't call Samsung's 108 mp camera as an advantage over Sony's 12 mp. Buyer sensors have their own ups and downs.
2. Much brighter screen? From what I've seen in the show rooms Samsung's screen is a bit brighter. Not by much. And I would rather sacrifice some brightness for screen longevity.
3. You can also enable HDR on Xperia front camera, which you didn't.
4. You're talking about underexposed Xperia photo and never say a word when Samsung does the same on a selfie shot.
5. Someone likes true to life night shots. Someone wants a night mode that turns night into day, making it a blurry mess. The same can be done with 1iii by adjusting settings in the Photo Pro.
6. Excessive use of HDR tends to flatten the video/photo and remove some details. Again you can enable all of that in the Photo Pro.
7. It seems like pre production units have didn't have final software tweaks for the camera. Many people who I know say clarity and sharpness are much improved after updates.
8. 70 mm and 105 mm FL is very useful for portraits, 45 angle shots and street photography. While 10x zoom on the Galaxy is useful only to shoot some long distance objects.
It really feels like you are biased and lean towards Samsung.
You use just basic mode without HDR and say about some shortcoming Xperia has (not even all of them are shortcomings, but different processing). All the while ignore such big features like 20 fps burst with af/ae and noise reduction in low light, best smartphone autofocus, 2 pro apps with plenty of interesting features.
I suspect your next video will get the same tone: price Samsung and bash Sony. Predictable.
Won't comment anymore to promote your biased reviews.
In General...
Clearly SAMSUNG wins.
Sad to say...
---- Experia are not improving...
maybe they have no enough budget.
Samsung is much great and higher than Experia.
SAMSUNG of South Korea
WIN ALL OVER.
Experia of Japan lost because of many Features lacking.
For example...
-- The Camera of Experia not improve.
Rear - 12 - 12 - 12 MP
Selfie - 12 MP again.
While Samsung S21 Ultra
Rear Camera - 108 MP 12 - 12 - 10 MP
Selfie Camera - 40 MP
Oh my gosh..!
Samsung S21 Camera is so powerful..!
Observe the Camera get by Experia,
its so Low Light and Darker
its like always dawn or night.
While in Samsung it seems to picture out what was the reality that it is not already night or dawn,
that there is light.
Then about
Battery Life...
Experia 4500 mAh
Samsung 5000 mAh
Experia RAM 12GB....?
While Samsung S21 has 16GB,
the Higher of all Flaghip phones.
And there are so many more.
Samsung is so far ahead compare to Experia.
My phone now is only
SAMSUNG A32 4G,
has 64 MP rear Camera,
the picture is so Good compare to other phones even the Ipone 12 has no chance to win over this 64 MP camera that I have.
How much more those S21 which has 108 MP and 100x zoom..?
@@lakbayanngkaalaman934 Don't talk like a s**t man. You just sent spec sheets and that doesn't clarify Samsung wins. Does S21 have an SD Card slot? Can S21 shoot a video with 4K/120fps? Does S21 have a headphone jack? Only trolls like you say Sony are outdated devices! Go back to your shamsung phone and keep shilling them for downgrading and removing functionality while doubling the price! "QUALITY OVER QUANTITY"
@@lakbayanngkaalaman934 i dont see where it says its 16gig ram.. Smh.. Even the s22 ultra didnt come with it..
@@lakbayanngkaalaman934 Dude, Samsung does not have 108mpx camera. U need to learn basics about how pixel numbers on mobile phones actually works than to comment. Second, you need to learn how to write correctly name of Sony Xperia.
Next, when we talk about features there is 4k screen ,hp jack, micro sd slot, 360 harman cardon speakers and more features overall inside Sony.
Samsung camera is not realistic. Orange deer? Hallo?😂
That all is good, but when i saw your last comment about 64mpx camera on A32 and the part that Iphone 12 cant mach with ,I was shocked. Samsung is based on numbers. I rumember s20ultra came out with 108mpx and 100x zoom and camera was crap.Again numbers. 16gb of ram for what? Higher price. In 10 years from now there will be no need for 16gb of ram in mobile phones. After all, Samsung is loosing money year after year even tho they sell milions devices and finally, S22ultra came out which looks like Sony Xperia XZ premium with pen. Samsung has no idea what they are doing.😂
Reasons why I'm buying this phone :
Actual 21:9 aspect ratio not those weird 18:9.5 or similar
No notches or holes in the screen
Dual front facing speakers
3.5mm headphone jack
SD card support
Nearly all phones are 20:9 now and they look good.
Those are exactly the reasons why I'm buying one too
3.5mm is useless, not much power to drive headphones, dynamic is just bad as it is, Bluetooth over 3.5 mm or simply music player for music
@@ThereIsOnlyOneRandom 3.5mm is always better than trash compromised bluetooth sound
I have the Xperia 1ii for more than a year now and also have a galaxy note 10 plus for like two years. Definitely the Xperia takes much real pictures and the HDR on Xperia is just crazy to the point that the dynamic range is there but you would never be able to tell it was HDR shot. Basically very smooth tones and roll offs. And you will never regret the Sony.
abstract: samsung bursts colors to create a photo for social media, while Sony creates more professional photos
I agree, xperia 1 iii give profesional picture
Except, color processing aside, the dynamic range and computational photography is just better. Sony need to work on this if they actually want to compete- I do like Sonys color processing btw so I'm not entirely bashing Sony here.
Sony was designed to take shots in RAW unedited format. I prefer to have full control of my shots instead of letting Samsung oversaturate the sharpness and colors...
What a load of crap lmao Sony fanboys will say anything to save face.
@@GTS300Coupe Good Luck With Overexposed Colors
@@trendytv05 lame excuse for Sonys poor picture processing
@@GTS300Coupe There Is HDR Option In Sony D*mba*s
@@trendytv05 and there is pro mode and RAW in Samsung and almost every other Android flagship, your point is?
Imagine this guy comparing RAW to JPG and saying JPGs have much better colors lol.
Exactly my thoughts lol 😂😂😂
I am using Xperia 1 ii
I was laughing during whole video will his comparison logics
Hahahahahahaha biased much right!
Hahahahaha
a powerfull meme
Exactly!!! Lol😂
I would gravitate towards the Xperia 1 III. Those shots are actually much closer to real life. Dark areas actually being dark, colors not being oversaturated, and less noise on night shots. Goes to show that you don't need a high MP camera to take really good shots.
It is actually good to see some reviewers review sony phones like the average users, so that we know where is the weakness as an average users, BUT, for people that used sony phones for long time or photography enthusiast people, we already know what to explore with sony phones when we buy it, of course we want to explore and enjoy as many control on the phones features. I think sony aim for different niche than other brands, well done for sony💪
Good or not they are quite biased. Where's the individual Xperia 1 iii review before they use it to promote their bias Samsung? So rush to promote theirbias brand even releasing this out of target comparison video before the independent Xperia review? Pathetic
Sony is my love
Yes average user, suck every reviewer do to be honest. That way Sony allways loses, because they test it like a average user. Wich her actually says in the end.
Agree that i prefer Sonys Night shoots because it lookes like it's night, not like the Samsung that makes it likes like it's in the morning
they didn't "aim for different niche", they lost in almost every race so they try to survive, they better just give up
@@HoangNguyen-go1ne I can never understand why anyone wants less competition.... I don't really like LG phones but there are other people that do enjoy what LG offers
why would I spread hate simply because it's not something I prefer? I'm not going on a LG comparison video to say how terrible LG is and that they're not doing things the way I would like
it's sad theyre gone
but now so many want Sony gone as well? why does being different mean I should stop doing what I do?
What benefit do you gain from having less competition? (makes it easier to be called #1 I guess?)
what do you gain from Sony no longer making the phones you will never buy????
Sony isn't even advertising much (basically 0 advertising) so you're literally taking time out of your day to express your disdain for something you don't care about something you won't notice or interact with..... I'm just so confused
I prefer the night photos on the Xperia. Looks natural, not unrealistic like on the Galaxy.
What is unrealistic of galaxy pictures ?
@@rusirubatuwatta8731 The night photos, to much light, everything is boosted to look better, but in my opinion it looks worse. It's just my preference.
@@davorin86 Simple, turn off S21's night mode and can get darker photo too.. And old phones which do not have night mode, can do the same thing like xperia did
@@aldwin360 no, more natural means more natural. Those deer are NOT that colour!!!
I pre-ordered it. It's definitely a phone for me. I need the Manual controls, the great autofocus and tracking, the easy to take out Micro SD card, and the variable zoom. Not much else matters. Had to buy it. Wouldn't buy any other phone because this phone is the only one that fits into my workflow.
Made in Japan and 3,5mm made me buy this phone. Cameras on S21 ultra is better for an average consumer like me. but I care about the headphone jack, and made in Japan more.
@@KS_1990 Actually I think it's made in Malaysia, but yes, I do get your point. I'm preordering as well!!!!!!! 🙌
@@KS_1990 if you can buy these phones I'm pretty sure you are also Capable of settling for a better USB c earphone.thank you
Congrats to all of you to be able to get your hands on the new and latest Sony phone. Sony unfortunately stopped business in our region. Being a 'Only Sony' user since 2001 I feel a bit envy of you lucky guys, watching this video on my 2017 XA1 Ultra.😢
I live in Cambodia but order it from china, hoping to see made in China somewhere. But cannot find it. Ended up seeing article on Sony moving production of its high end smartphones to Japan. So supprised. So I will stick with Sony as long as they are in the market.
That is a professional camera..!!
He's using manual control.
Always love *Sony* ❤️
I'll still buy SONY. My heart goes with it 💕
5:10 I don't know if this guy has ever seen a deer or not. Sony's processing is natural here, the deer's skins look as they are and pleasing to the eyes. Whereas, Samsung processing makes the footage way warmer than it is in a real scenario.
He made soo many stupid conclusions ant that is one of the worst, Sony make so profesional and good photos.
On this clip he was wrong, but a lot of people actually appreciate a more saturated image. Apple success is based on this future. In rest, Sony should improve a lot in camera department because is behind competition.
@@alxdava2004 Sony is not behind, hi is in front of competition in evry segment of picture (if you ask any photographer) but young instgram hdr fake oversaturated people make things wrong
@@dejan110782 Then you're blind! 😅😅 Go and visit an oculist
Sony fan here that apparently he can't accept that Samsung is better 😅
Complaining about dynamic range in the video and not turning on HDR to get more dynamic range us a absurd
THIS.
HDR is an OPTION on the Sony because it stops the phone burst shooting.
YOU. HAVE. TO. TURN. IT. ON.
I dont know why but everyone want Sony win.
It makes no sense to not use the pro camera app on Sony 1iii. he using the stock camera ...photo pro with correct iso takes better picture
Because it's how Sony is capable of doing for their targeted customers, not what this biased channel is about. Wheres the autofocus and moving objects capture test? None. Sony market autofocus and fast capture the most at top priority and see how these so called "reviewer" review? NONE of this is tested. That's no point comparing and showcase what other is good at and bash Sony for hdr when they don't even turn on the hdr and test the autofocus.
Yea, this review is for 50 year old soccer mom's that have issues setting up their email on their phone. Actual camera users love this phone and showed video quality at the same as the alpha camera from don't which is incredible. This phone is exposing a lot of people who don't understand how to use their alpha cameras
@@Joshpower57 atleast he could of shown us raw images and how it works...take the best photo pro raw photo then compare it to Samsung and iPhone..why is it so hard to do that ? Hahaha
Look at the objects in sony are more appealing thats what we need. Xperia is king
I think I like the Sony images better. They look more natural. S21 looks processed and kind of unexpected. I was considering the S21, but the more I look at these reviews, I am leaning towards the Sony for picture quality.
If you look at the footage of the deers, theyre fucking orange on the Samsung, yet says its better. Most biased part of the review, has he ever seen deers in real life?
Curious why you only focused on the bad part of the Xperia. For instance at 5:29, you mentioned that it has poor dynamic range, but you fail to mention the amount of noise on the S21 Ultra's footage.
At 5:00, you mentioned the saturation but didn't mention the stabilisation.
Most reviewers seem to have have made up their mind before actually doing the review 🤷🏽♂️. None of them are actual photographers/videographers so it's too be expected at this point.
No one real photographers using crap devices like xperia 1 💩
@@xyz3702 Yes, crap people won't use crap devices like X1.
the s21 looks way over exposed most of the time whereas the sony looks a bit dark but definitly too soft
There is a difference between over-sharpening of the image and actual sharpness of the lens At timeline 3:60, S21U image is over-sharpened and looks digitized although the reviewer think it's sharper than the Sony. S21U images also tend to have over-saturated colors while X1iii has much more natural colors. However, it seems many people, including reviewers, think saturated colors are more pleasing. At 10x, the S21U definitely out-performs the X1iii as the S21U has a 10x optical lens. No debate there. If one needs to use >8x regularly, then get the S21U. However, I think most people don't need beyond 8x for 99% of their images. Best thing to do is try out both at the stores.
Sony little bit darker, but more true to life, more accurate
I Agree
Way less computing calculation in the Sony it looks real, in contrasty situation you can’t have information in the darks and sky not blown out that’s just a fact, otherwise it looks hdr bullshit
Yes, in high contrast conditions sony is not very good at controlling the hdr, the dark and bright parts can't display detailed information. In my opinion, Sony's image processing / software is not that good compared to other competitors. I sometimes also think why Sony's camera image processing/software is inferior to other cellphones, even though Sony itself is a big brand and also an old player in the camera world.
Samsung is good at dealing with HDR, but here I see photos in some parts of the leaves that look bright, but it looks like there is a white fog covering them. It feels like when editing a photo, where when you want to force the dark part (shadow) it will appear like a white fog, that's how I think.
@@user-mq5pi7xn7w agreed, Sony’s closer to a dslr / mirrorless feel and as a learning photographer that’s what I’m looking for. I’m not a fan of too much processing internally I’d rather edit the photo myself
If you are not going to use the photo pro or cinema pro then this whole review is BS. Take the best photo on photo pro and compare. You sound like a fanboy. The whole point of the phone was to use the pro apps. Why ignore that app that is meant for the camera?
Sound? They are, not sound like. See how they don't even test autofocus speed and fast capturing show it. It's like saying Sony provided 4k hdr 120hz display but they do not go and turn it on and review it under 1080 60hz.
@@fantasytky28 i still don't understand the agenda behind these reviews. I'm a pixel owner too. Imagine avoiding to use a car feature that's meant for a specific car because other cars don't have it. Its useless review
Watch the deer's are more appealing in Xperia and natural that is what everyone needs.
5:18 I prefer Sony more than Samsung due to more natural colours.
samsung looks lively than sony.
@@archie7288 Samsung looks very colored
I don't care
I'll go for sony I'm interested in audio quality in headphones
I'm a music addict, and I love what Sony offers.
Not a photographer but i really like this phone just because the specs is capable, NO notch or punch hole, headphone jack, shutter button, plus don't mind to learn the manual setting especially the multi tele 70mm-105mm. Look forward to see the pros using them as a photographer first then phone.
I don't get why the telephoto lens is such a big deal? The one part I actually agree with in this review is just out the 4th camera in there. But I guess space and cost maybe? From the consumer side of things I don't see what it adds really though?
"More vibrant"
*Over-saturated
Apple is proud of this future
Flat
Dark
How is that even oversatured? It's SLIGHTLY more pleasing to the eye. You're delusional
@@propersod2390
To each of their own. More natural looks are for photographers.
@@peterdurum434 just saying but you can edit in post lmao. And smartphone photos are meant to be ready for sharing not dull and boring
You are comparing a Samsung phone which has received dozens of camera updates after releasing to a Sony phone that has pre released software…would be more fair if this comparison was done after the phone is at least released.
Bullshit. Sony phones always were inferior in camera software even after dozens of updates and probably always will because sony never put enough resources to it.
Tell SONY to wait till them patch everything then put the product on the market?
You’re already late, why we pay to wait more?
Hahaahahahaaahahahahaa
@@amirprog when using auto for sure but on using manual mode kid.
Yep just got it and the results are MUCH better, it's night and day compared to the samples in this 'comparison'
I think this guy is not professional enough to do comparison in manual mode..Xperias are mainly made for manual mode
LOL !
Nice Joke.
@@morselrafez3722 you are the joke here
@@morselrafez3722 m.czcams.com/video/mujnXJxQK4w/video.html look at Xperia manual mode
@@morselrafez3722 you are a 'joke'r
You guys are joke or just illiterates.
When you use full manual mode it all come down to sensor, lens and image processor quality.
So, most of the phones with similar specs should perform very similarly when it's at a professional's hand.
For any one who is interested in a solid comparison and unbiased review dont waist your time on this video.
The reviewer intentionally only uses auto mode on the xperia. And the comparison in photo and color quality changes significantly with the pro mode features.
I will address some of the things he was unhappy about.
The zoom camera comparison:
S21 ultra has a wider lense and farther zoom, this is correct.
But the s21 is adding computational processing to increase sharpening to un natural levels this is also causing the loss of colors and details in the stone (over exposed whites)and the leafs(uniform crushed and fake) ex @3:54.
The night mode:
You should be using pro mode for night photos and increase the exposure time and shutter speed to let more light in.
Regarding image stabilization samsung uses the wide angle lens and crops the photo using ai to keep the image from shacking its a smart trick but limits the available resolution
Regarding selfies:
No excuse on that the front camera is garbage because it cant use pro mode...(at least i havent seen a single reviewer try or mention it...)
As for the blown out whites:
Pro mode lets you select shutter speed and exposure level and they let you calibrate the white in the scene with cards so you can pre adjust the white level in your current lighting and then take the photo. This is not available in any other phones except the xperia. And not many people know about it. I have only seen one reviewer talk about the feature on the xperia 1ii. James lavish sony xperia 1ii camera (complete review) he also does a excellent professional camera test video comparing the xperia 1ii vs the iphone 12 pro max
The deer photo:
The colors are more natural but would be even better if it was in pro mode. Samsung has always had unnatural color in their screens and photos, the jab about what would a client want is bs in digital photography if you are not shooting 4k photos in raw and putting your photos in photoshop with a calibrated monitor for proper color grading and editing you are not getting the best quality you can in your photos.
This is how he or his edditors get the warm tone and dark professional feel same with unbox therapy and any other pro they dont just throw a camera on a desk and post a video everything is setup for the scene and the shot.
What you choose is really up to preference if you want to vlog and take vibrant photos/selfies using a led brick get the s21 ultra.
If you want to consume and make accurate professional level creative content but dont have or want to carry a camera around get the xperia.
I bought the s21 ultra on launch my biggest gripe switching from the lg g8 to the s21 ultra was:
No headphone jack
No sd card slot/ expandable storage.
No charger in the box. Previous samsung chargers not powerful enough for full fast charging.
Terrible battery life had to keep the high refresh rate off.
Glitchy os on the 888 processor apps would force close ov3r and over again and then would not close and continue running in the background draining the battery.
It was unreasonably heavy pulling pants down....yes with a belt.
To large thumb couldn't type or select things one handed
I liked the image quality on the s21 camera(normal and macro photos not super zoom) but could not get a single photo to appear natural
The colors were always wrong no mater what i did because the screens are calibrated to be more vibrant by adding around 75% green.(tested with a colormunkey)
So not only was the built in color profile for photos and video set up this way but the screen it self makes it impossible to get a natural photo. Color accuracy is relative to the accuracy of your screen.
So i only took black and white photos on the s21 ultra and then i sent it back because i just couldn't stand it anymore.
Also s21 ultra gets hot and throttles like crazy.
Nice fairy tale story, too bad sony is left behinds
@@xyz3702 thats cool, if you can not articulate a intelligent response, you should first try silence.
Unless of course you are a troll then it would be better to find the bridge you crawled from and kindly go back :) Thanks
@@delicrux truth is hurts
I would buy the Sony phone because I'm a fanboy not for the camera honestly, but you are completely correct, Sony needs to implement smarter software for average users like me who only wants a point-and-shoot camera in their phone. If you remember Sony had AI for this purpose in Xperia V back in the day, I think they were the first ironically.
Moustafa Ahmed, I think SONY camera division and Xperia agree with it. Point and shoot used optical processes. I came across a Vietnamese YT, where manual mode takes really good night scene photos. Sony systems cameras, Cybershots etc. made up the 2nd largest in the world for sales. The first is Canon. Samsung systems cameras division has rolled the carpet, where they can't compete with Japanese brands.
Yes im going to order the Sony. Like auto mode but have to learn manual now. Low light is better in manual. The real time tracking is awesome. Going to use it to video a lot
That is a cinematic camera pro
sony has more natural color, especially the green tone
BUT NOT GOOD
Its bad, flat and dark
watch other reviews, infact watch many, the results are not like this.
@@-syahmi6924 nope, its really bad post processing, they are behind mi 11 ultra either
@@-syahmi6924 i'm talking about post processing 💁🏻♂️
Those bricks it seems left behinds competition
You don`t understand what you are talking about .. You constantly insist that the Samsung has a wider dynamic range ... You apparently do not know that the Samsung automatically turns on HDR, while Sony has it turned off and it must be ON, then and you must to say, who has wider DR, otherwise your bloger chatter is at the low level. And if you like it when night turns into day, then this speaks of you, as not professional. So, in future, learn how to shoot, and then compare cameras
No use talking to these fanboy they are not even know anything about photography. Preferring overprocessed and overshapened over natural?
This guy blindly loving Samsung.. .heavy payment he got 😆
Well you see the pics for yourself. I think most blindly hate on Samsung 🤷🏾♂️
Or you blindly hate Samsung .
Yes if your samsung is snap dragon then yes its a great phone. However if its exnos its an inferior phone of the same product.
Well, taking pictures need to be as close as the eye can see, no over saturated etc. Sony gets those pictures. Yeah for eye-catching samsung is the king, but for the reality aspect, sony.
@@eubot1 come on... that is not heavily Over saturated... that is slightly pop up... yes before samaung phone are really over saturated... what do you think if you take photo in day time with DSLR? Does DSLR blow out the sky like sony xperia 1 iii? Lol 😆 funny some people are completely blind
He doesn't know what he is talking about, doesn't even point out the sensor size difference, literally all he talks about is dynamic range. Not saying he's wrong, but this review is a waste of time.
He praised the Sony stabilization though. He was very truthful in the review.
All the other reviews are lukewarm just like this one , so phone must suck 🤷♂️
@@shebjjeje9720 Not my point, suck as it may, the technology needed to be represented better, and not everyone has the inherent knowledge to do it without any research. The review lacked substance, and is not very informative, other than the fact that the cameras kinda suck despite the hype.
It's not a waste of time. This review was very good considering Sony is asking about the same price for as a S21 ultra. Yet it gets blown away in camera tech.
Why is Sony still using the small sensor like wtf.
@@dnegel9546 it doesn't really get blown away though, it does in this review because he doesn't even talk about 2 biggest thing the Xperia has going for it as more than an off handed comment. That is the manual mode and autofocus. He says he used it and it 2as good but did show any of the pictures or compare them to how the Samsung would do. And he literally just uses in auto mode which is limiting the camera to like 20% of it's potential.
The issue with Sony is that unlike Samsung, they don’t bribe reviewers.
Exactly, he is so set on promoting Samsung. What an idiot.
Lol OK
Apple has a marketing budget of more than a small country’s budget. But you will hardly see the advertisement of their phones on tv channels and you tube. So how come their budget is so large? They pay to you tubers and newspaper article writers to promote their products so that they never make a video and write against them, but promote their products. This is their advertisement model. This is the problem with Sony that they don’t pay to anyone. That is why no youtuber, tv channel or newspaper article writer has made a video comparing a fast moving subject using Xperia’s 20 fps with Samsung or apple. Honestly, telephoto camera is not that useful in real life which is promoted by you tubers, but camera capable of shooting sharp photos at 20fps is extremely useful in real life; for example, if you want to click photos of kids dancing or your pet doing something. No one is promoting this. At the end of the day, these you tubers, or newspaper article writers have joined this profession to make money and not to tell you the truth.
@@ssingh5423 LMFAO…sounds like you’re on your way to developing a rather shitty fictional novel. Do you have any proof of these allegations?
This reminds me of one reviewer kind of digging Sony and he does a lot of smartphone videos but not many about Sony. Well in this video he mentions that Sony is much more strict on lending phones to reviewers and not letting him use the phone for a while long or even keep the phone. It just came off as he is butthurt that Sony doesn't give him he wants so he doesn't review their phones.
These reviews sometimes make me think if I should feel worry and go to the oculist to check if my eyes have some overexposure issue😆
Stop reviewing tech when you are not qualify enough. 4:51 why portrait mode have your so called "blown out" background? Because it's using the optical lens and doing real bokeh which work like all the DSLR out there. Bokeh is obvious and colour become natural. And this so called tech reviewer don't know about it? Such a shame, preferring unnatural processed photo over natural is okay, but stop being so biased and shallow in knowledge
The amount of stupidity a sony fan can possess is astounding!
@@anonymoustroll1549 phone arena is garbage
@@kalilinux8940 yep I agree but sony phone division is garbage+pile of sh it.
@@anonymoustroll1549 nope, there's reviewers who got alpha camera quality off this phone. The movie creator mode used with the camera on this phone makes it a monster. Just watch art of photography, that guy is an actual photographer an this phone is awesome to him. If you guys want a soccer mom phone because you have issues logging into your emails when you get a new phone, go to apple or Samsung.
@@anonymoustroll1549 you are just behaving exactly like phonearena lol
Sony neutral what your eyes see is the truth. Even third TV, hifi and everything they produce, Sony focuses on neutral.
Samsung products are all over saturated.
professional LIARS is all they are, empire built on LIES, ORANGE DEER TECHNOLOGY
Sony is overatted as always, & always fails 💩
@@xyz3702 samsung brainwash full speed, enjoy your orange deers mong :)
Correct. Either this reviewer is clueless, or he's paid.
I could be going completely blind, but every single picture taken with the night mode looked better on the Xperia to me. Much more natural, the sky looks way too bright on the Galaxy (which is amazing in its own way, naturally, but it does not look very accurate to what your eye should be seeing). Also, were these all taken using the Xperia's Basic mode, or with the manual controls? Because if you used the Basic one, these all look really good to me, and way better than what 99% of the average consumer would need. If you really want a "professional" quality in your photos, learn to use cameras and buy a proper one, instead of buying a phone just because of its camera
Basic mode on the Sony is always a little week. You can use the pro app in auto mode to produce better photos.
There's no point telling them these. They all already know it. The point of this video is not to properly review Sony as their targeted customers. They just review it as the sake of promoting the biased Samsung. See how there is no independent review of Sony, they rush this comparison video out to somehow showcase Samsung. Autofocus and fast moving capture is ignored and not tested at all in this review. How is it even a proper test when what Sony focus at most is autofocus and moving subject capture. So a unprofessional channel
@@fantasytky28 I know, but I still feel I need to point things out in the hopes that it helps someone. I'm not even saying that the Xperia 1iii is a perfect phone, but you are spot on with the fact it mostly gets rushed glossed over reviews.
Xperia MK series is specially for professionals, so in pro mode no one can beat it.
99.9% of people dont give a damn about pro mode because they simply point and shoot.
@@amirprog i am from 00.1% of people.
@@amirprog Xperia is not for 99.9%
Go get your unrealistic, "Oversaturated" photos
@@amirprog then the 99.9% should just go buy iphone and samsung...
@@romanvssvmromania They sure do and they are sure happy. Nobody wants to mess with manual mode.
Took a framegrab at 3:52, applied an unsharp mask of 200% with 3 pixel radius for the Xperia 1 III. Then you can see that near the left ear there's more detail preserved on the Sony and overall looks better. Applying sharpening is a personal preference but I wish Samsung would add a control for that in their Pro app.
Also dynamic range is incorrectly interpreted since often you see deep blacks becoming dark gray, whites becoming light gray on the Samsung since they push the shadows/highlights significantly. Most people seem to prefer that but luckily Sony didn't. At least Samsung does allow in the pro app an adjustment (but not for all lenses). Or use RAW.
this is such a cope
10:07 - Yeah Sony has made it pretty clear they want to go specifically for that niche, that's the whole point of the phone
You can pretty much improve the night photography in the sony by just adjusting the iso and shutter speed
5:01 huh? What do you mean lol, the S21 is a shaky mess with oversaturated colours lmao, doesn't even know what he's talking about
He made soo many stupid conclusions ant that is one of the worst, Sony make so profesional and good photos.
Bruh how tf is the Samsung's footage better???? That shits shaking like crazy 🤨
For real. Vibrancy doesn't mean accuracy.
@@apexed2446 because stabilization was turned off, just watch the next few clips.
LMAO i love sony too but let's just admit s21 ultra has the best cameras for photography and iphone 12 pro max for videos.
Lol, this guy definitely samsung fanboy. He never mention how "some" photos on xperia 1 iii natural colors, "almost" all samsung colors is vibrant but yeah about detail samsung no comment.
regrets seeing this channel
Agree. 4:51 why portrait mode have his so called "blown out" background? Because it's using the optical lens and doing real bokeh which work like all the DSLR out there. Bokeh is obvious and colour become natural. And this so called tech reviewer don't know about it? Such a shame, preferring unnatural processed photo over natural is okay, but stop being so biased and shallow in knowledge
Lol and you are really a Sony fanboy. Admit it, the basic mode on Sony is worse than Samsung, because Sony deliberately want their users to use pro mode, they make the Xperia for enthusiasts, so they don't care about point and shoot for everyday user.
@@kevinpham9217 he is Sony fanboy and it's okay since he is not reviewing the product. The channel reviewer is reviewing product under Samsung fanboy biased which is not okay. Sony have already mentioned they are target toward enthusiastic and customers, they already mentioned their too priority is speed and autofocus and natural colours and none of these are tested at all.
Buy a manual sport car (Xperia) which have already clearly tell you it's targeted for manual users and here come the Tesla users (Samsung fanboy) complaining about auto driving in sport car and not even testing the drive in manual. What a nice reviewer. True reviewers review the product throughoutly not purely focusing on one item they favour. Why not reviewing the poor autofocus and capturing speed of Samsung
@@fantasytky28 Couldn't agree more👍. Not everyone liked the over processed images. Enthusiasts preferred and appreciate the natural looks from the Sony. And that's what this reviewer failed to point out. TBH, most reviewers only care for the average consumer nowadays, y'know, for views. I don't trust most of them, I just get what I want.
@@kevinpham9217 The pro app has an auto mode that you can use to point and shoot with better results than the basic mode. Reviewers fail to point that out for some reason.
I believe sony produced the more realistic color grading than the Samsung
Realistic blurry
So what? Only true colours aren't enough.
@@waleedjamal7545
Let me tell you that this is the hardest thing to do in a camera because there is a chromatic limitation
@@aidandimness8256 what are you talking about bro?
@@waleedjamal7545 I say that color science is something very important and making colors true to reality is one of the most difficult things for manufacturers, so it is a giant advantage for the xperia
The Sony shows the picture more nature not more darker
When zooming still can't beat the the 👑 of zoom S21 ultra
Interestingly, this video made me like the Sony even more. Side by side, it showed the technical superiority of the S21 Ultra, but also illuminated how used to the HDR and computational photography look of smartphones we all are at this point.
Take a look at the selfie videos at the beginning, for instance. Side by side, we can see the reasons that make the S21 Ultra technically superior. But look at each of the videos individually as if you were just watching someone who recorded it, and I think you might prefer the more natural look of the Sony.
Same thing and very evident with night shots. Side by side, you see the technically superior work of the S21 Ultra. But, look at each individually, and you might very well find the Sony to be more natural and pleasing.
And the argument from me is that "more natural" is the better starting point -- it gives you more control of where you want the image to go.
So what are you saying that the Sony phone camera captures photos and videos the way it looks in the human eye and the Samsung does not ? Are you saying that the Samsung phone basically photo shops the pictures and videos just so videos and pictures can be seen clearer and more visible at night ? I would really like to know what you are trying to imply here. I'm brand loyal to Sony in terms of all types of electronics and I was thinking of upgrading from X1 to the X1 III but a lot of review people are bashing the phone especially the camera. This makes me very hesitant in purchasing this $1200 phone
@@Dizzy160 That is what I'm saying, yes. I will say that "reality" to human eyes is probably somewhere in between -- more dynamic range than the Sony, but not quite as much as modern Samsung photos.
But, importantly, if the phone starts you off with more of the computational look already added, it gives you less flexibility in possible outcomes (what if you want dark shadows, blow out highlights, more natural colors, etc). I like the less processed approach because I'm used to real cameras and the Sony gets you closer to that in my opinion.
Computerised or natural calculation for the picture output quality.
Sometimes, the camera guy just want to retrieve text or details from a far distant. If is blurry or a muddy photo, but another phone managed to capture the information to digest.
Sony just failed miserably then.
Is there any convincing video to prove Sony can takes promising night video or photos since it got all the high tech setting on this phone from their Sony camera family?
I found another Taiwan reviewer explained HDR mode for this phone in night photo. It does the job pretty well to my liking.
Why does S21 hates shadows so much? It lifts them so much in every single daylight photo. It also oversharpens whenever it detects high frequency texture like sand or hair on your legs.
Because why? Samsung fanboy like this reviewer love overprocessed and overshapened result on Samsung. Such a shame
It's a good way to trick the average joe into thinking that the camera captured more details (probably to make it sharper than the IPhone)
For me fotos on the Sony look more natural. Also in the dark the Samsung does lighten up the fotos too much. The Sony shows real colors and is sharper. Best examples are the fotos from the pizzeria. Just my opinion…😊
I have Sony 1 III and my brother has the Samsung s21 ultra. Main camera and the wide-screen camera of Sony is better except in night. Sony looks more natural and samsung photos are more overexposed. Front camera and the telescope of Samsung are way better. The 4k videos are better on Sony if you know how to use the video app. Same with the photo app. Trust me it makes a huge difference.
points taken. the zooming capabilities of the Xperia are totally blown out of the water when it compares to the Galaxy. But the lack of mention to the noise on the video aspect of the S21 is too much focus on the dynamic range of the video. Samsung Galaxy would still win in terms of Auto mode. And the Night Mode comparison was also one wherein Night Mode shouldn't necessarily mean to make night photos look like day but there are points where Xperia takes the cake for having a decently lit photo. there are definitely points in the video where it was just totally an HDR-driven comparison which isn't fair due to the nature of the phones being compared.
Also the noise being sharpened and seen as detail :)
If I could afford it, I'd buy Xperia 1 iii simply because of the subtle elegant design and screen quality. It stands out.
Sony's mobile strategy is finally starting to make sense. Give it a few years, you'll understand what its aiming for.
Do you want to capture the natural "human eye" scene, or do you want an unnatural, over sharpened, HDR tuned exposure. The video of the deer made me laugh. The Samsung was video was shaky, blurred and orange. The Sony was sharp, rock steady and natural. Shouldn't night shots look like it's night time? Isn't that what you're trying to capture? Yes, what the Samsung does is impressive, but it's not natural or artistic.
Yes, I want Samsung to fix night photos look like "Night", not put exposure in night photos... Sony night photos were amazing!!!
@@arfathkhalid1099 it’s fucking easy… you don’t need to use night mode than it will be night photo! Lol why so hard? By the way when DSLR take photo at night I never seen that dark! They also brighten up so don’t say bullshit! How about selfie camera? Of course you will say you won’t use it but Sony selfie camera is so suck! If you talk about videography… lol 😂 Sony even can’t switch to lenses! Sony fans should complain to Sony developers not to reviewers! It’s always nice to has auto hdr mode! If you don’t want you always can turn off!
@@CK-ox2br the xperia does have auto HDR mode. Its in the photography pro.
@@bloodytoad2010 yes that is in pro mode! How about auto (they call is BASIC MODE) mode? No.. they still don't have it!
@@CK-ox2br in program auto mode (P), shutter priority (S) and manual mode(M) as well as memory recall (MR) mode they have it already. All you need to do is to turn on auto HDR in this mode and snap. When you turn off your camera and activate it again it will still be the mode you last set. Is that very difficult?
The Sony images at night turn out darker...because it's night time. That's the point. Holy hell what a disaster of a 'review'.
Completely agree, if I want night foto, than I want that it looks like it's a night, and not bright day. Lol!
Emotions aside, each phone has its plus points. Sony has excellent colour accuracy and video stability, but Samsung has better sharpness and exposure. This means Sony performs excellent for close up photos and videos in normal light, but Samsung does better in low light (and even where there is too much light), and has better zoomed in photos/videos, and better selfie cam. If you want a phone you can quickly take a pic with, no thinking, that's the S21 Ultra. If you want a phone you're willing to learn manual controls for, and willing to take time to take a good picture, then Sony is great.
I think the zoom approach Sony went with is going to have some issues. Based on the samples I've seen so far, there appears to be a lot of blooming around bright objects in the photos, and the shots are not particularly sharp. Could be a consequence of the additional lens elements not being as optically clear, or allowing for more error in alignment, spacing, etc.
Or reviewers not using the phone properly and just using auto mode.
I kinda of agree with this review. But for years I've wanted phone manufacturers to move away from super sharpening the images. The extreme digital look is a bit much. If Sony could literally copy the basic modes of Samsung, apple and Google and not touch the pro modes it would be an mass winner.
Someone was saying in another video that you can just download Samsung's app for taking pictures. Not sure if true or not but since most of the quality in the Samsung seems to be digital I don't why you couldn't just a different camera app for point and click on Sony if that is what you wanted
There's an Auto mode for brighter night photos with HDR. Or if it want it more extreme use GCAM
Since the Xperia Z most of us just wanted a proper camera that is able to compete with the big boys and better. Battery life.Now in 2021 we have the same problems with dynamic range, the same problems with the highlights and no proper night mode.Nice mechanical camera but not so nice results for 1300 euros.Still dreaming for a competitive overall camera in a Sony smartphone since 2014.
The camera is fine it is the user that is the problem. If you want point and shoot either don't get the Xperia or just download a different camera app that over saturates the pictures for you.
Sony: noted I will never send another device to PhoneArena
Nor to MKBHD, nor to Mr.Mobile, nor to TechNick... :)
they should never make smartphone again, they are the best example for give up is a better option
@@HoangNguyen-go1ne or simply do what most people want beside your vision
@@moustafa_1994 ahhahahahahahaha most people want huh? like what
@@moustafa_1994 like getting hot for no reason ??? like annoying bug ??? like 4k video recording last for 2m because of heat huh ??? like amazingly slow screen rotate speed ??? like camera oriented with just so so picture and video output ??? like slow charging rate ???? like un-adjustable screen resolution which leave 4k run all the time ???
I love the shadows and contrast on the Xperia, you can take great photos using it. The Galaxy seems to keep HDR on all the time, I don't like it.
It's like taking instagram photos and bringing the Ambience to max all the time. It's a bit sickening to be honest.
these reviewers need to take footages and just post them in a video , without commenting on them
because some comments are biased as hell
Sony stays true to colours like they always do.
Probably it has a bit true colors but auto mode suck! If you compare portraits mode look how Sony overexposed! If you compare video how stupid that Sony doesn’t let change the lenses while taking video! By they way 2021 already there is no auto hdr mode yet and don’t say you don’t use! Everybody use auto hdr only Sony fans has no chance to use it coz they still don’t have it! Sony Zoom lens are blurry with no detail! Why?
Use Photo PRO & Cinema PRO. No one can beat Xperia 1iii. You should compare both with Auto & Manual mode.
That would be fair, he is obviously a Samsung fan who likes over exaggerated colors instead of true to life pictures.
Instead of giving reasons… Sony better to upgrade camera auto mode! 2021 already there is not auto HDR mode on Sony yet! So don’t complain him! Better to complain to Sony camera auto mode! Better to complain Sony developers! If you complain him noting will improve on Sony camera auto mode!
@@CK-ox2br Sony fanboy might change the narrative of your comment
@@vickneswaran198 opps... I don't think so coz they are completely blind.. they only blame to people who review sony phones but they never blame to what sony developers does! If we talk about Camera than sony has really shit selfie camera which is unacceptable and shameful for expensive flagship phone!
The sony is meant to be for Manual photography, like all a7 series camera
So buy the a7 dslr cameras. Phones r supposed to be easy and great at point and shoot.
When taking photos I think it is better to get a closer to life photo that isn't over saturated or sharpened too much because you get more control as the user. Samsung loves to make their photos pop but honestly it really doesn't match real life at all. If you are someone who likes to edit photos even just a little bit then the Xperia is the clear winner. The night shots are also a major win in my eyes for the Sony. They look like night, with proper shadows where the S21 tries to make it feel like day
5:31 the noise in the s21 ultra...
Xperia Mark 3 is a phone for professionals, you must know how to use the app and the parameters where its technology is taken advantage of. In this review it is clearly in automatic mode.
No one professional using garbage device like xperia, its dull & flat, so much processing 👎🏻💩
I have a big question for this reviewer. Do you own an alpha camera? How many times do you use the manual settings compare to the automatic set up. A real photographer is not happy with the automatic mode. They want to dive with true the settings. Even as a Samsung user I feel the color is fake. Not true to life. That is why you need to change the settings.
'b-but i want to take amazing pro quality pictures just by pointing and shotting ,,,ad sony not let do that ,need effort, who would pay for that. give me Everything for free,'
@@fujiwarachika2187 lol I'm guessing your joking but honesty taking a few minutes to have the settings ready for a time and weather or the day really make a the difference
This is very bias towards Samsung, in vídeo the Samsung is very shaky especially with the deer and the Sony has natural colours and is stable…you clearly didn’t use the camera pro app either for video or photos
At 9:20 of your video when you moved into a room, there’s a huge difference between the colours of walls. So, please tell which is accurate? Thank you
I can't say which camera portrays the most accurate colour of the wall but what I can say is that Sony's alpha mirrorless cameras are known to have a slight magenta tint to images that a strait out of camera.
The samsung one had natural colours, the xperia colours is dull and far from accurates.
The galaxy has an advantage in dynamic range and zoom and that's it. The Xperia has better colors that look more realistic imo even though it's a bit underexposed sometimes.
The night mode on the galaxy is, like its competitors that have this feature, unreal or too bright, the street shot is way nicer on the xperia, it looks more natural.
Videos need improvement on the xperia, although the colors are pleasant.
IMX sensors once were the best in the market, but since the S6 Edge ISOCELL has showed that they are much better everytime
A million laugh for this reviewer...looks like he has a bad taste in imaging..
A colorblind tech!
Sony is good for people who know what they are dooing. Galaxy is simple for the average people!
You should turn on the HDR Video from Xperia.. It gives better dynamic range
No point telling this. This is biased channel. They already knew this, but what's the point, they are not going to do it. No autofocus and fast capture test at all which is what Sony highest priority is. Comparing how overprocessed and overshapened photo when hdr are not even turned on in Xperia make no sense.
I don't know why this comparison was made .I mean it doesn't make any sense because Samsung s21ultra is among the best when it comes to camera and Sony Xperia 1 mark III doesn't even have an auto camera app and the basic one in their pro camera app is just to take a fast snap of some objects or some documents . If you want to do camera comparison then you have to tauggle the mannul mode in Xperia to get it's full potential . There's a camera comparison of iPhone 12 pro max vs Sony Xperia 1 mark III on the channel name Han's tech talk and Sony just nailed the iPhone 12 pro max in night shot photo
Night shots are overexposed on the S21, the sky is unrealistically brighter. But in general, Samsung definitely has more detail.
It's obvious because he never used the photo pro or cinema pro app and adjust the picture on the right iso....that's the whole point of that phone....
@@The-Heart-Will-Testify We want point and shoot not go, open , control then point and shoot. And oh, I could also adjust the iso to my taste on s21. Don't hate on Samsung just because it's better. Hate on Sony for poor camera software development
@@patrickjunior7288 you watch in yt han's 1 ii vs 12 pro max..
In this video they don't understand where the HDR xperia is
Sorry bad english
@@patrickjunior7288Xperia's USP is manual control, and is not made for people who only want point and shoot photo's.
@@saurabhbelgaonkar3693 There is also an auto mode in the pro app that produces better photos with just point and shoot. For some reason nobody likes to point that out.
Dear sir! Which is best for camera Sony 1 iii or s21 ultra??
Reviewers seldom talk(demo/contrast) about capturing pictures of moving targets(toddlers, pets etc)mostly blurry free.
Great camera 👍🏾 review otherwise.
Why not? Because it's what Sony good excel and targeted at and that's where all of the other including Samsung surfer. Why they would want to promote Sony? They use new product to promote Samsung. So you think they would even review Xperia properly? They don't even test any of moving or fast object photo at all and this show how biased or at least unprofessional they are.
On a Japanese photo review, you can see how this phone have been used, especially whith the manual/pro settings, with really good pictures of the Tokyo night atmosphere.
And the deer, sorry but are not orange for shure...
Link to Japanese review?
czcams.com/video/VcfJKfB5rKM/video.html
Good photo review...
The problems with the Xperia 1 III are others, such as the ridiculous front camera, reception is unclear if it has the same problem as the Mark II, not exactly good heat dissipation, and future Android support...
@@ukmitch86 I think this is it: czcams.com/video/VcfJKfB5rKM/video.html
How about over heating of the Sony SD888 and battery time of 10 hours when you use 120fps
Dude. Why only the camera specs? What about battery life? Battery life display using the same camera for video recording? Show the complete ordeal. Don't only show your own specific camera interest.
Phones aren't just pocket sized cameras. Not everybody is interested in solely photography. There's endless hobbies in life, man. Don't limit yourself to only 1 type of fun.
Other things important about phones:
•Animation transition speed
•everything battery/power related
•feel, comfort, temperature, lifespan of brightness/ pixels
•sound/ speakers
•Details of unique customizable options within accessibility and other settings.
•Sound difference using same exact headphones under various conditions like train/ truck noises, jackhammer noise, on the car speakers, etc.
•Signal reliability under many conditions and the limits of connectivity
•Potential tips like suggested accessories that can pick up what's lacking. (Example: memory cards, magnet charger issues, discounts on a life-proof phone case, etc.).
i think he hates Sony, if someone is after camera should go for DSLR or such
Yes this channel pay by Samsung
@@janes1138 💯
Samsung is the king of all android phones! Not only in camera but over all is light years ahead of every one else
Sony Xperia is the clear winner 🏆
Man tho....What is it with Samsung and Apple? Making more and more boring phones each year?
@@patrickjunior7288 I think you need to pause lol! 120Hz at QHD is peanuts, Xperia bringing in the big guns with 120Hz at 4K. Plus a load of other gaming features- e.g. 4K 240hz display with motion blur, shadowplay like feature to record last 30s of gameplay, gamma adjustment, in-game sound equaliser, HS Power Control (charge power bypassing the battery to not overheat). Snapdragon 888 is not a feature, every flagship is expected to have it. The S21 Ultra is boring because they took last years phone and re-labelled it pretty much. Still no headphone jack, no micro sd, no easy to remove sim tray, still has a notch/ cut-out, no front facing stereo speakers, no new innovative hardware. Xperia on the other hand, improved the speakers- bought 360 reality audio support natively, came up with better variable zoom camera tech- although it's first gen so similar to the S20 Ultra which had issues and should be tweakable over software. The Xperia display (whilst being 4K) has much better colour accuracy as each display is calibrated by hand to meet a standard- which has a labour cost and is part of the premium you pay for. The S21 Ultra cannot match the Xperia camera in some areas like 4K 120fps video, 20fps burst shot photography, fastest AF lock on etc. So not the best, also with Xperia three camera apps are for professionals- so the video records in the wider BT2020 color gamut and gives fps options/ look, custom white balance etc- which are not all available on the S21 Ultra (whilst the Xperia can do 4K 120fps in HDR, the S21 Ultra caps at 30fps in 4K HDR so yeah pretty boring despite being richer in R&D).
@@townofdudleysixth agree 💯
@@patrickjunior7288 ONLY 120HZ at quaDHD? SONY HAS 120HZ AT 4K YES 4K and it can do a software version of 240HZ!
Android phones need the sd 895 ISP to truly master the camera experience. The 888 gets close if perfectly optimised which the oem's aren't capable of, the extra capability of the 895 should bridge that gap tho :)
IPhones have been at that amazing level since the iphone 11pro but like... The camera software is limited af all around so it leaves enthusiasts disappointed (even apps like moment or filmic don't bridge the gap) that said though, the base camera of the 13 pro should be so freaking good that it also bridges the gap where nothing is left to be desired out of a smartphone camera...
In conclusion next years camera battles will be the most important of the decade. S22 vs iPhone 13 pro
Sony you are the 👑
Refer 8:17 & 8:22 & 8:30 ...
Nights photo Samsung S21 Ultra looks more 2D alike, it is just like a drawing loses all the high and low dynamic range, it missout the shadow and highlight.
The S21 is much better tbh.
Galaxy night photos = blooming.
I LOVE Xperia 1 mark 3 for my OLED
I don't like it when the Samsung heavily tries so hard to eliminate shadows by brightening them up way too much.
Besides, it's not like the Sony can't resolve as much details either, as editing the RAW photos properly can yield the same or even better results than the Samsung, depending on the user's preference.
Also, it was clear that the front-facing camera shootout at night was intentionally made to favor the Samsung because Sony has no Night Mode. At the very least, the Samsung could've just been taken straight out of Auto mode with no Night Mode at all to keep everything comparable.
Also, how ironic is it that you said that the Samsung has better dynamic range on the front camera, but the image you showed just depicted the Sony with the better dynamic range with the person being slightly better exposed than the Samsung.
**Is this the modern day version of so-called "Tech Reviewers?"**
First rear camera video shootout: The Sony is not pale, rather the Samsung is just oversaturated. I know it because even my sister's S20+ does the same thing, and based on reviews, the S21 Ultra isn't any different from that. Stabilization, however, is much better on the Sony as the Samsung looks quite shaky. But hey, let's not mention that because we need to make Samsung look better and Sony the worst of all, right?
Zoom video: I know the Samsung will be better since it has farther optical zoom range, but that sample from the Sony doesn't even look like it's the same 10x range as on the Samsung. It's much closer than the Samsung, so of course it's going to lose more details.
Anyway, the 10x zoom ranges on both phones are going to be different because they have different focal lengths from their main sensors that indicate 1x reference point.
You are average user....for Photography
Not Professional
Be a Professional photographer.....
The 2 things that Sony has going for it, manual controls and the autofocus, both are mentioned but neither is compared to the other phone. Doesn't seem like a very good review honestly.